iso4217:EUR iso4217:EUR xbrli:shares xbrli:shares 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2019-12-31 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2020-12-31 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2021-12-31 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 ifrs-full:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 ifrs-full:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2019-12-31 ifrs-full:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2020-12-31 ifrs-full:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2021-12-31 ifrs-full:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2019-12-31 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2020-12-31 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2021-12-31 ifrs-full:IssuedCapitalMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2019-12-31 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2020-12-31 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2021-12-31 ifrs-full:RetainedEarningsMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2020-01-01 2020-12-31 ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2021-01-01 2021-12-31 ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2019-12-31 ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2020-12-31 ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26 2021-12-31 ifrs-full:SharePremiumMember
2021
Universal Registration
Document
POXEL SA
A société anonyme (French joint-stock company) with a share capital of EUR 579,041.00 euros
Registered office: 259/261 Avenue Jean Jaurès – Immeuble le Sunway – 69007 Lyon
510 970 817 RCS LYON
UNIVERSAL REGISTRATION DOCUMENT
This Universal Registration Document has been filed on May 4th, 2022 with the Autorité des marchés financiers
(“AMF”), as competent authority under Regulation (EU) 2017/1129, without prior approval in accordance with
article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1129.
The Universal Registration Document may be used for the purposes of a public offering of securities or the
admission of the Company's securities to trading on a regulated market if it is supplemented by a securities
note and, if applicable, a summary and any amendments to the Universal Registration Document. The resulting
document is then approved by the AMF in accordance with the Prospectus Regulation.
Pursuant to Article 19 of EU 2017/1129 dated June 14, 2017 and to the Commission delegated
regulation EU 2019/980, the statutory and consolidated financial statements for financial year 2020,
as well as the related statutory auditors’ reports, and the statutory and IFRS financial statements for
financial year 2019, as well as the related statutory auditors’ reports included in the registration
document filed with the AMF on March 25, 2021 under number D.21-0195 and on April 20, 2020
under number D.20-0319 are incorporated by reference in this Universal Registration Document .
This document is available without charge at the Company’s registered office, and in electronic form
on the website of the Autorité des Marchés Financiers (www.amf-france.org) as well as on the
Company’s website (www.poxel.com).
Page 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PRESENTATION OF POXEL...............................................................................................................5
Message from the CEO .............................................................................................................5
Key information related to Poxel and achievements over the period......................................7
Selected Financial information ...............................................................................................16
COMPANYS ACTIVITIES................................................................................................................18
Business ..................................................................................................................................18
Risk factors..............................................................................................................................87
Material contracts.................................................................................................................118
Organizational structure and employees..............................................................................122
Corporate Social Responsibility Report ................................................................................132
FINANCIAL INFORMATION ..........................................................................................................162
Management discussion and analysis...................................................................................162
Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020......182
Statutory financial statements as of December 31, 2021.....................................................235
Auditors’ reports...................................................................................................................267
Other financial information ..................................................................................................281
GOVERNANCE AND LEGAL INFORMATION......................................................................................283
Governance...........................................................................................................................285
Compensation.......................................................................................................................309
Shareholding and stock performance...................................................................................325
Related party transactions....................................................................................................328
Legal information..................................................................................................................335
APPENDIXES.............................................................................................................................362
Responsible Persons, third party information, expert reports and approval of the competent
1.1
1.2
1.3
2
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.4
2.5
3
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
4
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
5
5.1
authority ............................................................................................................................................362
5.2 Concordance Table ...............................................................................................................363
Page 3
GENERAL REMARKS
Definitions
In the Prospectus, unless otherwise specified, the terms « Company » or « Poxel » refer to Poxel, a
société anonyme (French joint-stock company) with a share capital of EUR 579,041.00, whose
registered office is located 259/261 Avenue Jean Jaurès – Immeuble le Sunway, 69007 Lyon, France,
and registered with the Lyon Registry of Commerce and Company under number 510 970 817. The
term « Group » refers to the Company and its subsidiaries and participations.
Forward-looking statements
This Universal Registration Document contains forward-looking statements about the Company’s
prospects and areas of growth. These statements are sometimes identified by the use of the future
tense, the conditional form, and forward-looking terms, such as “estimates”, “considers”, “targets”,
“expects”, “intends”, “should”, “wishes” and “may” or any other variations or similar terminology.
Readers are reminded that these prospects and areas of growth should not be interpreted as a
guarantee that the statements and forecasts mentioned will occur, nor that the assumptions will be
verified or the objectives achieved. This information is based on data, assumptions and estimations
considered as reasonable by the Company. Such data, assumptions and estimations are likely to evolve
or change due to uncertainties related to economic, financial, competition or regulatory factors. The
prospects may, consequently, not be achieved and information provided by the Prospectus may prove
to be erroneous. However, subject to applicable regulations, particularly to the AMF General
Regulations and the European Regulation (EU) No 596/2014 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 16 April 2014 on market abuse (market abuse regulation), the Company shall not be under
any obligation to update the Prospectus.
Risk Factors
Investors are urged to give careful consideration to the risk factors described in Section 2.2 “Risk
factors” of this Universal Registration Document before making any investment decision. The
occurrence of any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on the Company, its business, its
prospects and ability to achieve its objectives, its financial position and/or development. Other risks
and uncertainties not identified by the Company on the date of the Universal Registration Document
or risks that it considers, on the same date, not to be significant may nonetheless exist and materialize,
and may also disrupt or have an adverse effect on the Company's business, financial situation, earnings
and prospects and/or on the Company's shares.
Page 4
1 PRESENTATION OF POXEL
1.1
Message from the CEO
Dear Madam, Dear Sir, Dear Shareholder,
I am happy to share with you this new edition of our Universal Registration Document, which is the
opportunity to review Poxel’s accomplishments during the year 2021 has been a particularly
important year in Poxel’s history, as it marks the first approval and launch of one of our drugs.
Indeed, in June 2021, we received, with our partner Sumitomo Pharma, a leading company in the
®
diabetes field in Japan, approval in Japan for TWYMEEG (Imeglimin), and this was followed by its
launch in September 2021. This major accomplishment resulted from the submission of a Japanese
New Drug Application for Imeglimin in July 2020, based upon an extensive preclinical and clinical
program, including positive results from the Phase 3 TIMES program in over 1,100 patients in Japan.
The TWYMEEG approval in Japan represents the culmination of several years of clinical development
work and a strong validation of our R&D capabilities and international footprint.
TWYMEEG is a first-in-class drug with a unique dual mechanism of action for the treatment of type 2
diabetes across the continuum of the current treatment paradigm. It was approved in Japan as a
monotherapy and as an add-on treatment to other glucose lowering therapy regimens. Poxel is
entitled to receive sales-based payments and escalating 8-18% royalties on product sales. We are
immensely proud to have brought TWYMEEG to patients in Japan through our fruitful partnership
with Sumitomo Pharma.
We also achieved significant milestones during 2021 in NASH. In September, we completed
enrollment in DESTINY-1, a dose-ranging Phase 2 trial evaluating PXL065 for the treatment of NASH.
PXL065 is a novel, proprietary deuterium-stabilized R-stereoisomer of pioglitazone.
Additionally, following a thorough review of the Company’s programs, Poxel has embarked on a new
chapter to drive shareholder value. We made the strategic decision to advance and expand our
portfolio of clinical assets in rare metabolic diseases which represents the intersection of high unmet
medical needs, promising pre-clinical and clinical data, opinion leader enthusiasm, significant
commercial opportunity, and attractive time horizons. We believe that by leveraging our existing
platforms and proven capabilities to develop products in rare metabolic diseases in addition to NASH,
we can be more efficient with our resources and more expediently deliver novel medicines to patients
with an even stronger potential to create significant value for the benefit of our shareholders.
Our first rare disease development program targets X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), a serious
monogenic disorder with no approved pharmaceutical therapy. Our recent preclinical data with
PXL065 and PXL770 demonstrates that both approaches have substantial efficacy potential. During
2021, the team has been preparing for the initiation of two identical Phase 2a studies which will enroll
adult male patients with AMN, the most common form of ALD, and observe the effect of PXL065 and
PXL770 over 12 weeks of treatment on pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy. In February and April
2022, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation to PXL065 and PXL770, respectively, for the treatment
of ALD, designed to expedite development of pharmaceutical products which demonstrate the
Page 5
potential to address unmet medical needs in serious or life-threatening conditions. Drugs with Fast
Track Designation are eligible to apply for Accelerated Approval and Priority Review at the time of a
New Drug Application submission, which may result in faster product approval.
During 2021, we also strengthened the Company’s financial position, through the milestone payment
of JPY1.75 billion (EUR13.2 million) received from Sumitomo Pharma in July for the approval of
TWYMEEG, and the final tranche of EUR 13.5million of the IPF loan, which was contingent on the
successful approval of the Imeglimin in Japan.
Lastly, I would like to mention that in 2021 we launched our first Corporate Social Responsibility
initiative, that will be fully part of our corporate strategy, to continue developing the Company in a
even more responsible way. After completing a thorough assessment of existing actions at the
beginning of the year, we have then set up clear objectives and monitoring tools to support our
ambitious action plan, with the help of our entire team. You will find more about our ongoing plan in
the following pages, and I am looking forward to sharing our progress in the coming years.
In 2022, we expect several additional important milestones. Results from the PXL065 Phase 2 DESTINY
study in NASH are anticipated in Q3 2022, and the two studies in AMN/ALD, subject to financing, are
planned to initiate in midyear 2022, with data expected in early 2023. We are actively pursuing a
number of funding initiatives in parallel to extend our cash runway. We are in advanced discussions
with several parties and we are confident that at least one of these options will be completed before
Q3 2022, allowing us to continue to execute our strategic plan.
Our vision as a company is focused on developing innovative drugs for chronic diseases with metabolic
pathophysiology, including NASH and rare metabolic disorders, starting with ALD. In addition to our
clinical-stage programs, we continue to evaluate external opportunities with a focus on chronic and
rare metabolic diseases, to expand our pipeline.
All the work and success we accomplished this year would not have been possible without the
incredible energy from our talented employees, and I want to thank them for all that we accomplished
during very challenging times. I am also grateful to the patients and physicians who take part in our
clinical trials. Lastly, I would like to thank you for your continuous support as a shareholder.
Sincerely,
Thomas Kuhn
Chief Executive Officer
Page 6
1.2
Key information related to Poxel and achievements over the period
1.2.1 General information, history and achievements over the period
Poxel is an international clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of
novel treatments for serious chronic diseases with metabolic pathophysiology, including rare
metabolic disorders and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). With its expertise and understanding
of cellular energy regulation pathways related to metabolic diseases, and know-how in the
development of drug candidates, the Company is developing a portfolio of drug candidates, which
includes: PXL770 and PXL065, for both the treatment of NASH and the rare disease, X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD). Poxel intends to advance into pivotal trials one program in NASH and
one in ALD. Earlier stage programs focusing on chronic and rare metabolic indications are also in
progress.
With its heritage in diabetes, Poxel’s first product, Imeglimin, was approved in June 2021 for the
treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan and launched in September 2021 as TWYMEEG® by the
Company’s partner, Sumitomo Pharma. In a new chapter of the Company’s evolution to drive
shareholder value, Poxel continues to execute its strategic plan to advance and expand its portfolio
of clinical assets for both NASH and rare metabolic diseases, aligned with the Company’s strategic
shift announced in July 2021. This strategy leverages the Company’s scientific strengths with newer
promising pre-clinical and clinical data in rare metabolic indications which represent the intersection
of high unmet medical needs, opinion leader enthusiasm, significant commercial opportunity, and
attractive time horizons.
Poxel was founded in 2009 through a spin-off of Merck Serono’s metabolic-focused business, as part
of a strategic realignment following the acquisition of Serono by Merck. As part of this spin-off, the
Company assumed key personnel for this group and assets from Merck Serono, including Imeglimin
and the AMPK activator program that led to the Company’s discovery of PXL770. The Company’s
management team is composed of experts with extensive experience in metabolic diseases and rare
disorders. Key members of its team have experience from Merck Serono, Servier, Eli Lilly and Merck
& Co. and were involved in the discovery, clinical trial designs and regulatory approvals for a number
of products prescribed globally, including Glucophage® (metformin), Trulicity® (dulaglutide) and
Januvia® (sitagliptin).
Page 7
Stages of Development of Principal Drug Candidates
The table below sets forth details relating to the current stages of development of the Company’s
clinical and preclinical drug candidates in rare diseases, NASH and type-2-diabetes:
Robust Mid-to-Late Stage Metabolic Pipeline
Focus on Rare Metabolic Diseases and NASH
Approved
Discovery /
Indication
MOA
PH1
PH2
PH3
/
Upcoming Milestones
PC
Marketed
NASH
Phase 2 results expected Q3 2022
505(b)(2) pathway
Non-Genomic
TZD1
PXL 065
NASH
NASH
AMPK2
Activator
Successful Phase 2a Study
PXL7 70
Evaluate next steps early 2023
Rare Metabolic Indications
Fast Track Designation granted April 2022
Initiate Phase 2a midyear 20227
PXL7 70
ALD3
AMPKActivator
Fast Track Designation granted Feb 2022
Initiate Phase 2a midyear 20227
Non-Genomic
TZD
PXL 065
ALD3
Completed preclinical; develop clinical strategy
Select lead candidate(s)
PXL7 70/Next -Gen AMPK
ADPKD4
AMPKActivator
Not
Disclosed
Non-Genomic
TZD
Next-Gen D-TZD
Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
TWYMEEG ® Japan /Asia 5
TWYMEEG approved for T2D in Japan in June 2021
Product launchedSeptember 2021
MRC6
Modulator
T2D
T2D
Poxel entitled to receive 8-18% royalty on net sales
Imeglimin
US / EU / Other
MRC Modulator
Considering specific territories partnerships
1.
Deuterium-mo died thiazolidined ion e
5. Includes: China, South Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines,
Singapore, Myanmar, Cambo dia, Laos
6. Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain
2. AMP-kinase
3. X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy
4. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
7.
Subje ct to additio nal financing
Page 8
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)
NASH is a severe form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) that results in an accumulation of
fat in the liver and is one of the most common liver diseases in the United States. It affects
approximately 20% of the world's population and up to 70% of type 2 diabetes patients. According to
published estimates, about 10% to 30% of NAFLD patients also suffer from NASH. A scientific
publication in 2018 estimated that there were approximately 16.5 million prevalent NASH cases in the
United States in 2015, which was projected to increase by 63% to 27.0 million cases by 2030.
With no approved drug treatments, NASH can lead to life-threatening conditions like cirrhosis, liver
failure, liver cancer and death. NASH is considered one of the main causes of cirrhosis in adults. NASH
is also under-diagnosed and is a silent disease, meaning patients have no symptoms until the first
signs of liver failure appear. Many patients with NASH have type 2 diabetes (estimated 47%)1 and
many patients with type 2 diabetes also have NASH (estimated 26%)2. In addition, patients with NASH
and coexisting type 2 diabetes are more likely to have progressive fibrosis. Cases of liver cirrhosis
related to NASH are the second leading cause of liver transplants in the United States and are
expected in the next few years to become the leading cause of transplantation, ahead of hepatitis C
and alcoholic cirrhosis.
PXL065 - NASH
PXL065 offers a potential new approach to treating NASH. In August 2018, the Company acquired
exclusive, worldwide ownership of PXL065 (deuterium-stabilized R-pioglitazone), a clinical-stage
program being pursued for the treatment of NASH, from DeuteRx. As part of the PXL065 acquisition,
the Company also acquired additional programs, including other deuterated drug candidates for
metabolic, specialty and rare diseases. The Company fully owns development and commercialization
rights for PXL065.
Pioglitazone is a mixture, in equal proportions, of two mirror molecules (R and S stereoisomers) that
interconvert in vivo. Like all other products in its class, pioglitazone targets both activation of
peroxisome proliferator-activated gamma receptors (“PPARy”) and modulation of non-genomic
targets including inhibition of the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (“MPC”) and long chain acyl-CoA
synthetase 4 (“ACSL4”).
In addition to its established role in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone has been the
subject of a large number of clinical trials in the treatment of NASH, which have demonstrated its
ability to target disease resolution and to improve fibrosis.3
Pioglitazone is the only drug recommended in guidelines of the American Association for the Study of
Liver Diseases (the “AASLD”), and is the only drug identified as a potential treatment by the European
Association for the Study of the Liver (the “EASL”), for the treatment of biopsy-confirmed cases of
NASH. However, pioglitazone is not approved for NASH and its use is restricted due to the adverse
effects associated with the activation of PPARy receptors, such as weight gain, bone fractures and
fluid retention. PXL065, the R stereoisomer, has little or no observed PPARy activity or associated
adverse effects that appear to be related to the S stereoisomer of pioglitazone. Preclinical models
1 Younossi ZM et al; Hepatology 2016.
2 Cusi et al, Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; Portillo/Cusi et al, J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015
3 Musso G. Hepatology 2017; 65:1058-61.
Page 9
have shown that PXL065 should retains efficacy that is similar to pioglitazone in NASH with little or no
weight gain or fluid retention.4
In September 2021, Poxel announced the completion of enrollment in the Phase 2 NASH trial for
PXL065 (DESTINY 1) in biopsy-proven patients which initiated enrollment in September 2020. Topline
data from this Phase 2 NASH trial is anticipated in Q3 2022. DESTINY 1 (Deuterium-stabilized R-
pioglitazone (PXL065) Efficacy and Safety Trial in NASH) is a Phase 2 36-week, randomized, dose-
ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study designed to assess the efficacy and
safety of three doses of PXL065 in 123 noncirrhotic biopsy-proven NASH patients across multiple
clinical sites in the US. The primary endpoint of the study will measure the relative change in the
percentage of liver fat content based on magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton density fat
fraction (MRI-PDFF). The study will also assess the effects of PXL065 on liver histology and other
metabolic and non-metabolic biomarkers. The results will be used to help identify the dose or doses
for a Phase 3 registrational trial.
Based on the Company’s pre-investigational new drug meeting with the FDA in the United States in
the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company plans to pursue the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for
PXL065, which has the potential for expedited development. Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FDCA”) permits the filing of an application for marketing approval where
at least some of the information required for approval comes from clinical trials conducted by others
for other approved drugs. The Company plans to pursue a regulatory pathway under section 505(b)(2)
for PXL065 that relies on data from the parent drug, pioglitazone, which has been approved and
prescribed since 1999.
PXL770 - NASH
PXL770 is a direct activator of AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK). Poxel fully owns development
and commercialization rights for PXL770. AMPK is a central regulator of multiple metabolic pathways
leading to the control of lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis and inflammation. Based on its central
metabolic role, the Company believes that targeting AMPK offers the opportunity to pursue a wide
range of indications to treat chronic metabolic diseases, including diseases that affect the liver, such
as NASH.
Since it is the Company’s intention to advance one candidate, either PXL065 or PXL770, in NASH and
the other candidate in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), the initiation of the NASH Phase 2b trial
for PXL770 is postponed, pending results from the ongoing PXL065 Phase 2 trials in NASH, expected
in Q3 2022, and both Phase 2a biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in ALD to be initiated midyear
2022, with results expected in early 2023.
On October 1, 2020, the Company announced positive top-line results for the STAMP-NAFLD PXL770
Phase 2a trial which was launched in April 2019. The Phase 2a trial was a 12-week, randomized,
parallel group study, in 120 presumed NASH patients with or without type 2 diabetes. This Phase 2a
trial produced positive effects that are potentially predictive of longer term efficacy NASH. In the per
protocol population, PXL770 was observed to produce a statistically significant mean relative decrease
of -18% in liver fat mass from baseline at 12-weeks in the 500 mg QD dose group as measured by MRI-
PDFF. A greater proportion of patients who received PXL770 also achieved a >30% relative reduction
in liver fat content compared to placebo. Despite nearly normal mean baseline HbA1c values (6.03-
6.30%) across all groups (patients with and without diabetes), a significant reduction in mean HbA1c
4 Jacques V et al. Hepatol Comm 2021 ;5:1412-25.
Page 10
was also observed. A similar trend was also observed on fasting plasma glucose. PXL770 was observed
to be generally safe and well tolerated. The number of patients with treatment-emergent adverse
events in each group were similar to placebo and these events were mainly mild-to-moderate. The
safety results from the Phase 2a trial are consistent with the PXL770 PK/PD trial and Phase 1 program.
In patients with type 2 diabetes (41-47% of each group), PXL770 treatment resulted in a greater mean
relative reduction in liver fat content (-27% at 500 mg QD; p=0.004 versus baseline). Additional
findings in this sub group included: a significant increase in the proportion of responders (>30%
reduction in liver fat); dose-responsive and significant mean decreases in alanine transaminase (ALT)
and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels that were achieved despite only slightly elevated mean
baseline ALT levels (36-47 IU/L; normal range <41 IU/L). In these patients, baseline fasting glucose
(121-144 mg/dL) and HbA1c (6.6-7.1%) levels were well controlled, and in this context, significant
placebo-adjusted decreases were observed in both glycemic parameters along with improvements in
commonly used fasting indexes of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR and QUICKI scores). In the T2DM
subpopulation, PXL770 was generally safe and well tolerated and was similar to the whole trial
population.
Rare Metabolic Disease – X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD)
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy – ALD – is a deadly, inherited rare metabolic disease characterized by
neurodegeneration. ALD is a monogenic inborn error of metabolism due to mutations in the ABCD1
gene which encodes a key cellular fatty acid transporter – this defect results in accumulation of very
long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) with resulting damage to several tissues in particular neurons.
ALD is increasingly being diagnosed based on the recent and broad-based adoption of newborn
screening. Thus, the prevalence of ALD is similar to hemophilia or spinal muscular atrophy – about
20,000 in the US alone.5 Globally it may affect more than 400,000 people.
Forms of this disease include cerebral ALD (C-ALD) and adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN) which is the
most common form – typically occurring in adolescence through adulthood. AMN is characterized by
chronic and progressive distal axonopathy involving the long tracts of the spinal cord and to a lesser
extent the peripheral nerves resulting in progressive stiffness and weakness in the legs, impaired gait
and balance, incontinence, and loss of sensation. As an X-linked disease, nearly all men with a
diagnosis of ALD will develop AMN and are more severely affected, but many women also present
with features of AMN with a later onset. C-ALD is characterized by inflammatory demyelination of
cells in the brain and typically afflicts children, but many men with AMN may also develop cerebral
disease; these white matter brain lesions lead to severe neurologic deficits and death.
There are currently no approved medicines for ALD (other than glucocorticoid supplements for
associated adrenal insufficiency). Cerebral-ALD (C-ALD), when first detected in early childhood, can
be treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but it is currently limited to early stage of C-
ALD and this procedure is at risk of severe adverse reactions.
PXL065 & PXL770 in ALD
Following the new strategic direction announcement made in July 2021, Poxel is investigating the
potential of PXL065 and PXL770 in ALD. The Company is preparing to initiate two identical Phase 2a
clinical proof-of-concept (POC) biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in adrenomyeloneuropathy
(AMN), the most common form of the disease. AMN afflicts adults with ALD resulting in progressive
5 Bezman L. Am J Med Genet. 1998; 76:415-19.; Matteson J. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7:22
Page 11
spinal cord axonal degeneration that leads to spasticity, impaired balance and gait, bladder and bowel
dysfunction, impotence. These deficits ultimately cause severe disabilities. Over 90% of male ALD
patients develop AMN by age 60 6
Two identical Phase 2a studies will enroll adult male patients with AMN and observe the effect of
PXL065 and PXL770 over 12 weeks of treatment on pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy using
relevant biomarkers, including potential impact on elevated VLCFA, the hallmark plasma marker of
the disease. These two studies are planned to initiate in midyear 2022, with data expected in early
2023. The data from these studies will be utilized to select which compound, PXL065 or PXL770,
possesses the preferred profile to advance into a pivotal study in 2023.
In February and April 2022, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation (FTD) to PXL065 and PXL770,
respectively, for the treatment of ALD. FTD is designed to expedite development of pharmaceutical
products which demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs in serious or life-
threatening conditions. FTD provides Poxel with substantially enhanced access to FDA, including
opportunities for face-to-face meetings and written consultations throughout the remaining
development of PXL065. Drugs with FTD are eligible to apply for Accelerated Approval and Priority
Review at the time of a New Drug Application (NDA) submission, which may result in faster product
approval.
In ALD pathophysiology, increases in VLCFA, specifically saturated C26 fatty acid, are the primary
driver of disease with downstream pathologies leading to axonal degeneration for both cerebral and
spinal cord disease. Both PXL065 and PXL770 have the potential to target ALD pathophysiology; this
could include suppression of elevated VLCFA, specifically saturated C26:0 fatty acid, the primary driver
of disease. In addition, downstream pathologies such as inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction
could be ameliorated. Net effects could include reduced axonal degeneration for both cerebral and
spinal cord disease.
Importantly, multiple recent publications support the utility of both AMPK activation and deuterated
thiazolidinediones (D-TZD)-related pathways for the treatment of ALD.7 The Company has developed
evidence to show that both AMPK activation and D-TZDs can be leveraged to address this
pathophysiology to correct the primary defect - suppressing VLCFA levels - and by potentially
ameliorating downstream consequences that include mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation and
cell death.
Both PXL065 and PXL770 mediate neurologic benefits. The Company has studied both of its lead
molecules in classical ALD preclinical models, patient derived-cells and the ABCD1 null mouse. In these
data, it has been observed that both compounds produced substantial reductions in VLCFA both in
vitro and in vivo, including in brain and spinal cord. In more recent experiments that were also
conducted using ABCD1 mouse, evidence of improved neural histology and neuro-behavior were
observed with both PXL065 and PXL770.
Diabetes
According to the International Diabetes Foundation, in 2021 an estimated 537 million people between
the ages of 20 and 79 are living with diabetes globally (1 in 10), with more than 90% of those affected
having type 2 diabetes. This estimate is predicted to rise to 643 million by 2030 and 783 million by
2045. Diabetes caused at least USD 966 billion in total healthcare expenditures in 2021, a 316%
6 Huffnagel IC. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019; 104:118-26.
7 Morato L. Brain. 2013; 136:2432-43; Weidling I. J Neurochem 2016:138:10-13.
Page 12
increase over the last 15 years. Globally, 541 million adults have Impaired Glucose Tolerance, which
places them at high risk of type 2 diabetes.
Decision Resources, an independent market analysis firm, estimates that diabetes treatments
generated sales of over $61.3 billion in 2017 in the United States, Japan, Germany, Italy, the United
Kingdom, France and Spain, which the Company refers to as the G7 countries, and that sales in these
markets are projected to grow to $75.5 billion by 2027. According to Decision Resources, the diabetes
monotherapy treatment market in the G7 countries was approximately $1.7 billion in 2017 (with the
current standard of care, metformin, used for the treatment of approximately 60% of type 2 diabetes
patients in the G7 countries), while the market for new oral combination therapies was approximately
$21.5 billion in 2017 (with sitagliptin accounting for a 46% market share within its class).
Japan
According to Decision Resources, Japan is the second largest diabetes market worldwide, behind the
United States, with a compounded annual growth rate of more than 18% between 2008 and 2012 and
could grow by more than 20% by 2023. According to Decision Resources, estimated sales in Japan are
expected to grow to $4.2 billion by 2020.
There are an increasing number of patients seeking treatment for diabetes in Japan, both type 1 and
type 2, Japan is among the top five countries in Asia for prevalence of diabetes; the latest estimate is
11 million patients8. The Company believes that this market trend is likely to continue, in particular,
given that the Japanese government has identified diabetes as a target disease in its ten-year plan for
National Health Promotion.
Imeglimin for Type 2 Diabetes
Poxel’s first product, Imeglimin, was approved in June 2021 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in
Japan and launched in September 2021 as TWYMEEG® by the Company’s partner, Sumitomo Pharma.
Imeglimin is a novel, first-in-class diabetes treatment because it has the ability to target mitochondria
and cellular energy metabolism leading to a dual mechanism of action; to the Company’s knowledge,
there are no approved products or product candidates in advanced development by third parties
which modulate cellular bioenergetics by directly targeting mitochondria for the treatment of
diabetes.
The Company also believes Imeglimin is the only oral compound with a dual mechanism of action
designed to both increase insulin secretion in response to glucose and to reduce insulin resistance. As
a consequence of these effects, the Company believes that Imeglimin has the potential to slow disease
progression and provide therapeutic options to patients who no longer respond to current
treatments. It may also have the potential to complement existing treatments and to decrease the
risk of cardio-renal disease. To date, Imeglimin has been evaluated in 28 clinical trials and
administered to an aggregate of 400 non-diabetic subjects and over 1,800 type 2 diabetes patients.
Imeglimin has been well-tolerated in these trials and the Company has observed statistically
significant reductions of hemoglobin A1c, or HbA1c, and other glycemic parameters versus placebo.
Commercial Partner – Sumitomo Pharma
In 2017, the Company has entered into a partnership agreement for Imeglimin with Sumitomo
Pharma, for commercialization and development rights in Japan, China and eleven other East and
8 International Diabetes Federation 2021 Atlas;
Page 13
Southeast Asian countries (see Sections 2.3.2 “Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement" for more details
on this agreement). As per this agreement, the Company has received upfront payments and
payments related to achieving clinical development and regulatory milestones totaling JPY 7.0 billion
(approximately EUR 53 million) between 2017 and 2021. The Company is entitled to receive sales-
based payments up to JPY26.5 billion (approximately EUR 200 million, USD 227 million) and escalating
8-18% royalties on net sales under the Sumitomo Pharma license Agreement. As part of the Merck
Serono licensing agreement (see Sections 2.3.1“Merck Serono Agreement" for more details on this
agreement), Poxel will pay Merck Serono the first 8% royalty based on the net sales of Imeglimin,
independent of the level of sales. Poxel retains the net royalties above 8%. Based on the current
forecast, the Company expects an 8% royalty rate through Sumitomo Pharma’s Fiscal Year 2022
(March 2023). Therefore, the royalty stream will be cash neutral until TWYMEEG revenues cross the
first threshold. When TWYMEEG achieves the next commercial threshold, the royalty rate will
increase to the next level for a positive net cash flow to Poxel. Based on the Sumitomo Pharma
forecast submitted to the Japanese pricing authority, the next threshold and sales based payment
would occur after March 2023. The Company expects to receive double digit royalties for most of the
time of TWYMEEG’s commercial life, after March 2023.
On June 23, 2021, The Company and Sumitomo Pharma announced the approval of TWYMEEG, the
name for Imeglimin hydrochloride, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan. Japan is the first
country in the world to approve Imeglimin. The approval triggered a JPY1.75 billion (approximately
EUR 13.2 million, USD 15.8 million)9 milestone payment to the Company. The product launch of
TWYMEEG, 500mg tablets for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan, started September 16, 2021.
9 Converted at the exchange rate as of June 21, 2021.
Page 14
1.2.2 Other information about the Company
1.2.2.1 Name of the Company
The name of the Company is: Poxel.
1.2.2.2 Place of registration and registration number of the Company
The Company is registered with the Lyon Trade and Company Registry (RCS) under the number
510 970 817.
The Company’s NAF (business activity) code is 7219Z.
The Company’s LEI (legal entity identifier) is 9695003OIX0T7NX72N26.
1.2.2.3 Date of incorporation and term
The Company was incorporated on March 11, 2009, for a term of 99 years expiring on March 11, 2108,
save in the event of early dissolution or an extension.
1.2.2.4 Registered Office of the Company, legal form and applicable law
The Company is a French société anonyme (public limited company) with a Board of Directors.
The Company, governed by French law, is primarily subject to article L. 225-1 et seq. of the French
Commercial Code.
The registered office of the Company is:
259/261 Avenue Jean Jaurès – Immeuble le Sunway – 69007 Lyon
Phone: 0033 4 37 37 20 10
Fax: 04 37 70 88 15
Information about the Company are available on the Company's website: www.poxel.com
Information from the Company’s website does not form part of the Universal Registration Document.
Page 15
1.3
Selected Financial information
The financial informations are presented in millions of euros. Amounts are rounded to the nearest
million and include individually rounded data. Arithmetic calculations based on rounded items may
differ from the aggregates or subtotals shown.
1.3.1 Selected Financial Information
The following selected consolidated statements of income (loss) data for the two years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2021 and the selected consolidated statements of financial data as of
December 31, 2020 and 2021 have been derived from the Group’s audited consolidated financial
statements included elsewhere in this Universal Registration Document.
Selected Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) Data
(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
December
31, 2021
December
31, 2020
Change
Change %
97%
Revenue
13,397
-59
6,806
6,592
-59
COGS
Gross margin
13,339
-27,479
2,305
-10,627
-22,463
-2,950
868
6,806
-29,219
2,517
6,533
1,740
-212
96%
-6%
Research and development expenses
Subsidies
-8%
General and administrative expenses
Operating income (loss)
Financial expenses
Financial income
-9,923
-29,819
-1,727
1,722
-704
7%
7,356
-1,223
-854
-25%
71%
-50%
-140%
-34%
-25%
-93%
-25%
Exchange gain (loss)
Financial income (loss)
Net income (loss) before taxes
Income taxes
785
-1,970
-1,975
-31,794
-36
2,755
678
-1,297
-23,760
-2
8,034
34
Net income (loss)
-23,762
-31,831
8,069
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share
(0.83)
(1.16)
Number of shares used for computing basic and diluted
earnings (loss) per share
28,642,334
27,528,783
Page 16
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Data (in thousands)
December 31, 2021 December 31, 2020
Change
Change %
Cash and cash equivalents
Total assets
32,287
54,889
8,206
40,203
65,077
27,065
21,554
16,459
38,013
65,077
-7,915
-10,188
-18,859
9,228
-20%
-16%
-70%
43%
-3%
Total shareholders’ equity
Total non-current liabilities
Total current liabilities
Total liabilities
30,782
15,901
46,683
54,889
-558
8,671
23%
-16%
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
-10,188
1.3.2 Investments
1.3.2.1 Principal investments made over the last two financial years
The Group’s investments made over the last two financial years essentially concern the acquisition of
IT and office equipment.
1.3.2.2 Principal investments in progress
No significant investment has been made since January 1, 2022.
1.3.2.3 Principal planned investments
The Company does not currently intend to make significant investments in the coming years, for which
the management bodies of the Company have made firm commitments.
Page 17
2 COMPANYS ACTIVITIES
2.1
Business
2.1.1 General presentation
Poxel is an international clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of
novel treatments for serious chronic diseases with metabolic pathophysiology, including rare
metabolic disorders and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). With its expertise and understanding
of cellular energy regulation pathways related to metabolic diseases, and know-how in the
development of drug candidates, the Company is developing a portfolio of drug candidates, which
includes: PXL770 and PXL065, for both the treatment of NASH and the rare disease, X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD). Poxel intends to advance into pivotal trials one program in NASH and
one in ALD. Earlier stage programs focusing on chronic and rare metabolic indications are also in
progress.
With its heritage in diabetes, Poxel’s first product, Imeglimin, was approved in June 2021 for the
treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan and launched in September 2021 as TWYMEEG® by the
Company’s partner, Sumitomo Pharma. In this new chapter of the Company’s evolution to drive
shareholder value, Poxel continues to execute its strategic plan to advance and expand its portfolio
of clinical assets for both NASH and rare metabolic diseases, aligned with the Company’s strategic
shift announced in July 2021. This strategy leverages the Company’s scientific strengths with newer
promising pre-clinical and clinical data in rare metabolic indications which represent the intersection
of high unmet medical needs, opinion leader enthusiasm, significant commercial opportunity, and
attractive time horizons.
Poxel was founded in 2009 through a spin-off of Merck Serono’s metabolic-focused business, as part
of a strategic realignment following the acquisition of Serono by Merck. As part of this spin-off, the
Company assumed key personnel for this group and assets from Merck Serono, including Imeglimin
and the AMPK activator program that led to the Company’s discovery of PXL770. The Company’s
management team is composed of experts with extensive experience in metabolic diseases and rare
disorders. Key members of its team have experience from Merck Serono, Servier, Eli Lilly and Merck
& Co. and were involved in the discovery, clinical trial designs and regulatory approvals for a number
of products prescribed globally, including Glucophage® (metformin), Trulicity® (dulaglutide) and
Januvia® (sitagliptin).
Page 18
Stages of Development of Principal Drug Candidates
The table below sets forth details relating to the current stages of development of the Company’s
clinical and preclinical drug candidates in rare metabolic diseases, NASH and type-2-diabetes:
Robust Mid-to-Late Stage Metabolic Pipeline
Focus on Rare Metabolic Diseases and NASH
Approved
Discovery /
Indication
MOA
PH1
PH2
PH3
/
Upcoming Milestones
PC
Marketed
NASH
Phase 2 results expected Q3 2022
505(b)(2) pathway
Non-Genomic
TZD1
PXL 065
NASH
NASH
AMPK2
Activator
Successful Phase 2a Study
PXL7 70
Evaluate next steps early 2023
Rare Metabolic Indications
Fast Track Designation granted April 2022
Initiate Phase 2a midyear 20227
PXL7 70
ALD3
AMPKActivator
Fast Track Designation granted Feb 2022
Initiate Phase 2a midyear 20227
Non-Genomic
PXL 065
ALD3
TZD
Completed preclinical; develop clinical strategy
Select lead candidate(s)
PXL7 70/Next -Gen AMPK
ADPKD4
AMPKActivator
Not
Disclosed
Non-Genomic
TZD
Next-Gen D-TZD
Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
TWYMEEG ® Japan /Asia 5
TWYMEEG approved for T2D in Japan in June 2021
Product launched September 2021
Poxel entitled to receive 8-18% royalty on net sales
MRC6
Modulator
T2D
T2D
Imeglimin
US / EU / Other
MRC Modulator
Considering specific territories partnerships
1.
Deuterium-mo dified thiazolidined ion e
5. Includes: China, South Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines,
Singapore, Myanmar, Cambo dia, Laos
6. Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain
2. AMP-kinase
3. X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy
4. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
7.
Subje ct to additio nal financing
Page 19
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)
NASH Market Overview
According to the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, non-alcoholic fatty
liver disease (NAFLD) results in an accumulation of fat in the liver and is one of the most common liver
diseases in the United States. It affects approximately 20% of the world's population and up to 70%
of type 2 diabetes patients.
NASH is a severe form of NAFLD. These liver diseases lead to cases of cirrhosis and hepatocellular
carcinoma. According to published estimates, about 10% to 30% of NAFLD patients also suffer from
NASH. A scientific publication in 2018 estimated that there were approximately 16.5 million prevalent
NASH cases in the United States in 2015, which was projected to increase by 63% to 27.0 million cases
by 2030. There are currently no approved drug treatments for NASH. NASH is also under-diagnosed
and is a silent disease, meaning patients have no symptoms until the first signs of liver failure appear.
Many patients with NASH have type 2 diabetes (estimated 47%)10 and many patients with type 2
diabetes also have NASH (estimated 26%)11. In addition, patients with NASH and coexisting type 2
diabetes are more likely to have progressive fibrosis. NASH can lead to life-threatening conditions like
cirrhosis, liver failure, liver cancer and death. Cases of liver cirrhosis related to NASH are the second
leading cause of liver transplants in the United States and are expected in the next few years to
become the leading cause of transplantation, ahead of hepatitis C and alcoholic cirrhosis.
PXL065 - NASH
PXL065 offers a potential new approach to treating NASH. In August 2018, the Company acquired
exclusive, worldwide ownership of PXL065 (deuterium-stabilized R-pioglitazone), a clinical-stage
program being pursued for the treatment of NASH, from DeuteRx. As part of the PXL065 acquisition,
the Company also acquired additional programs, including other deuterated drug candidates for
metabolic, specialty and rare diseases. The Company fully owns development and commercialization
rights for PXL065.
PXL065 is the R stereoisomer (deuterium stabilized single R-isomer) of pioglitazone, its parent
molecule marketed since 1999 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.
Pioglitazone is a mixture, in equal proportions, of two mirror molecules (R and S stereoisomers) that
interconvert in vivo. Like all other products in its class, pioglitazone targets both activation of
peroxisome proliferator-activated gamma receptors (“PPARy”) and modulation of non-genomic
targets including inhibition of the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (“MPC”) and long chain acyl-CoA
synthetase 4 (“ACSL4”).
In addition to its established role in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, Pioglitazone has been the
subject of a large number of clinical trials in the treatment of NASH, which have demonstrated its
ability to target disease resolution and to improve fibrosis.12
Pioglitazone is the only drug recommended in guidelines of the American Association for the Study of
Liver Diseases (the “AASLD”), and is the only drug identified as a potential treatment by the European
Association for the Study of the Liver (the “EASL”), for the treatment of biopsy-confirmed cases of
NASH. However, pioglitazone is not approved for NASH and its use is restricted due to the adverse
10 Younossi ZM et al; Hepatology 2016.
11 Cusi et al, Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; Portillo/Cusi et al, J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015
12 Musso G. Hepatology 2017; 65:1058-61.
Page 20
effects associated with the activation of PPARy receptors, such as weight gain, bone fractures and
fluid retention. PXL065, the R stereoisomer, has little or no observed PPARy activity or associated
adverse effects that appear to be related to the S stereoisomer of pioglitazone. Preclinical models
have shown that PXL065 should retains efficacy that is similar to pioglitazone in NASH with little or no
weight gain or fluid retention.13
In September 2021, Poxel announced the completion of enrollment in the Phase 2 NASH trial for
PXL065 (DESTINY 1) in biopsy-proven patients which initiated enrollment in September 2020. Topline
data from this Phase 2 NASH trial is anticipated in Q3 2022. DESTINY 1 (Deuterium-stabilized R-
pioglitazone (PXL065) Efficacy and Safety Trial in NASH is a Phase 2 36-week, randomized, dose-
ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study designed to assess the efficacy and
safety of three doses of PXL065 in 123 noncirrhotic biopsy-proven NASH patients across multiple
clinical sites in the US. The primary endpoint of the study will measure the relative change in the
percentage of liver fat content based on magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton density fat
fraction (MRI-PDFF). The study will also assess the effects of PXL065 on liver histology and other
metabolic and non-metabolic biomarkers. The results will be used to help identify the dose or doses
for a Phase 3 registrational trial.
Based on the Company’s pre-investigational new drug meeting with the FDA in the United States in
the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company plans to pursue the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for
PXL065, which has the potential for expedited development. Section 505(b)(2) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the “FDCA”) permits the filing of an application for marketing approval where
at least some of the information required for approval comes from clinical trials conducted by others
for other approved drugs. The Company plans to pursue a regulatory pathway under section 505(b)(2)
for PXL065 that relies on data from the parent drug, pioglitazone, which has been approved and
prescribed since 1999.
In April 2019, the Company announced completion of a Phase 1a trial; PXL065 met the trial endpoints
and was well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events, and the results of the trial were consistent
with the outcome of earlier preclinical studies that suggested a smaller dose of PXL065 has the
potential to provide an improved therapeutic profile over higher doses of pioglitazone. In December
2019, the Company announced results from a Phase 1b, multiple ascending dose, double-blind,
randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 30 healthy subjects to evaluate the safety, tolerability and PK
profile of PXL065. The trial was observed to show dose proportionality at all doses tested. Based on
these results and other clinical and preclinical data, the Company was able to identify the dosing range
of 7.5mg to 22.5 mg that is being evaluated in the Phase 2 DESTINY 1 trial.
PXL770 - NASH
PXL770 is a direct activator of AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK). Poxel fully owns development
and commercialization rights for PXL770. AMPK is a central regulator of multiple metabolic pathways
leading to the control of lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis and inflammation. Based on its central
metabolic role, the Company believes that targeting AMPK offers the opportunity to pursue a wide
range of indications to treat chronic metabolic diseases, including diseases that affect the liver, such
as NASH.
Since it is the Company’s intention to advance one candidate, either PXL065 or PXL770, in NASH and
the other candidate in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), the initiation of the NASH Phase 2b trial
13 Jacques V et al. Hepatol Comm 2021; 5:1412-25.
Page 21
for PXL770 is postponed, pending results from the ongoing PXL065 Phase 2 trials in NASH, expected
in Q3 2022, and both Phase 2a biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in ALD to be initiated midyear
2022, with results expected in early 2023.
On October 1, 2020, the Company announced positive top-line results for the STAMP-NAFLD PXL770
Phase 2a trial which was launched in April 2019. The Phase 2a trial was a 12-week, randomized,
parallel group study, in 120 presumed NASH patients with or without type 2 diabetes. This Phase 2a
trial produced positive effects that are potentially predictive of longer term efficacy NASH. In the per
protocol population, PXL770 was observed to produce a statistically significant mean relative decrease
of -18% in liver fat mass from baseline at 12-weeks in the 500 mg QD dose group as measured by MRI-
PDFF. A greater proportion of patients who received PXL770 also achieved a >30% relative reduction
in liver fat content compared to placebo. Despite nearly normal mean baseline HbA1c values (6.03-
6.30%) across all groups (patients with and without diabetes), a significant reduction in mean HbA1c
was also observed. A similar trend was also observed on fasting plasma glucose. PXL770 was observed
to be generally safe and well tolerated. The number of patients with treatment-emergent adverse
events in each group were similar to placebo and these events were mainly mild-to-moderate. The
safety results from the Phase 2a trial are consistent with the PXL770 PK/PD trial and Phase 1 program.
In patients with type 2 diabetes (41-47% of each group), PXL770 treatment resulted in a greater mean
relative reduction in liver fat content (-27% at 500 mg QD; p=0.004 versus baseline). Additional
findings in this sub group included: a significant increase in the proportion of responders (>30%
reduction in liver fat); dose-responsive and significant mean decreases in alanine transaminase (ALT)
and aspartate transaminase (AST) levels that were achieved despite only slightly elevated mean
baseline ALT levels (36-47 IU/L; normal range <41 IU/L). In these patients, baseline fasting glucose
(121-144 mg/dL) and HbA1c (6.6-7.1%) levels were well controlled, and in this context, significant
placebo-adjusted decreases were observed in both glycemic parameters along with improvements in
commonly used fasting indexes of insulin sensitivity (HOMA-IR and QUICKI scores). In the T2DM
subpopulation, PXL770 was generally safe and well tolerated and was similar to the whole trial
population.
In preclinical studies, effects of PXL770 have been observed on the main features of NAFLD and NASH.
By targeting the underlying root causes of NASH, the Company believes that PXL770 has the potential
to improve the treatment of key components of this disease, which include liver steatosis,
inflammation, hepatocellular ballooning and fibrosis. The Company believes PXL770 also has the
potential to provide benefits for known co-morbidities, including metabolic control of type 2 diabetes
and those related to cardiovascular disease. Following an evaluation of the safety and PK profile of
PXL770 in the Phase la clinical trial, the Company conducted a Phase lb trial with multiple ascending
doses, the Company announced that the results met the trial endpoints in July 2018. In August 2019,
the Company launched a pharmacokinetic (PK) / pharmacodynamic (PD) study for PXL770 for the
treatment of NASH for which it announced positive results on June 24, 2020. The primary objective of
this four-week placebo-controlled study, in 16 likely-NASH patients with insulin resistance, was to
assess the full pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of PXL770 as well as to evaluate safety and tolerability. In
the results observed, PXL770 met its study objectives showing a PK profile in likely-NASH patients that
was similar to the one observed in healthy volunteers in the Company’s Phase 1 program. In the PK/PD
trial, PXL770 was also observed to be safe and well-tolerated. PXL770 induced a statistically significant
suppression of de novo lipogenesis (DNL) known to be one of the important contributors to the
progression of NASH. This trial confirmed the target engagement of PXL770 on the AMPK pathway
and the potential of the drug in other metabolic diseases.
Page 22
Rare Metabolic Disease – X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD)
ALD Market Overview
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy – ALD – is a deadly, inherited rare metabolic disease characterized by
neurodegeneration. ALD is a monogenic inborn error of metabolism due to mutations in the ABCD1
gene which encodes a key cellular fatty acid transporter – this defect results in accumulation of very
long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) with resulting damage to several tissues in particular neurons.
ALD is increasingly being diagnosed based on the recent and broad-based adoption of newborn
screening. Thus, the prevalence of ALD is similar to hemophilia or spinal muscular atrophy – about
20,000 in the US alone.14 Globally it may affect more than 400,000 people.
Forms of this disease include cerebral ALD (C-ALD) and adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN) which is the
most common form – typically occurring in adolescence through adulthood. AMN is characterized by
chronic and progressive distal axonopathy involving the long tracts of the spinal cord and to a lesser
extent the peripheral nerves resulting in progressive stiffness and weakness in the legs, impaired gait
and balance, incontinence, and loss of sensation. As an X-linked disease, Nearly all men with a
diagnosis of ALD will develop AMN and are more severely affected, but many women also present
with features of AMN with a later onset. C-ALD is characterized by inflammatory demyelination of
cells in the brain and typically afflicts children, but many men with AMN may also develop cerebral
disease; these white matter brain lesions lead to severe neurologic deficits and death.
There are currently no approved medicines for ALD (other than glucocorticoid supplements for
associated adrenal insufficiency). Cerebral-ALD (C-ALD), when first detected in early childhood, can
be treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but it is currently limited to early stage of C-
ALD and this procedure is at risk of severe adverse reactions.
Following the new strategic direction announcement made in July 2021, Poxel is investigating the
potential of PXL065 and PXL770 in ALD. The Company is preparing to initiate two identical Phase 2a
clinical proof-of-concept (POC) biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in adrenomyeloneuropathy
(AMN), the most common form of the disease. AMN afflicts adults with ALD resulting in progressive
spinal cord axonal degeneration that leads to spasticity, impaired balance and gait, bladder and bowel
dysfunction, impotence. These deficits ultimately cause severe disabilities. Over 90% of male ALD
patients develop AMN by age 60.15
Two identical Phase 2a studies will enroll adult male patients with AMN and observe the effect of
PXL065 and PXL770 over 12 weeks of treatment on pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy using
relevant biomarkers, including potential impact on elevated VLCFA, the hallmark plasma marker of
the disease. These two studies are planned to initiate in midyear 2022, with data expected in early
2023. The data from these studies will be utilized to select which compound, PXL065 or PXL770,
possesses the preferred profile to advance into a pivotal study in 2023.
In ALD pathophysiology, increases in VLCFA, specifically saturated C26 fatty acid, are the primary
driver of disease with downstream pathologies leading to axonal degeneration for both cerebral and
spinal cord disease. Multiple recent publications support the utility of both AMPK activation and
deuterated thiazolidinediones (D-TZD)-related pathways for the treatment of ALD,16 and the Company
14 Bezman L. Am J Med Genet. 1998; 76:415-19.; Matteson J. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7:22
15 Huffnagel IC. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019; 104:118-26.
16 Morato L. Brain. 2013; 136:2432-43; Weidling I. J Neurochem 2016:138:10-13.
Page 23
has developed evidence to show that both AMPK activation and D-TZDs can be leveraged to address
this pathophysiology by both correcting the primary defect - suppressing VLCFA levels - and by
potentially ameliorating downstream consequences that include mitochondrial dysfunction,
inflammation and cell death.
In 2021, the Company presented new results in cell-based and in vivo preclinical models of ALD at
several key meetings, including the 11th International AMPK Meeting, the World Congress of
Neurology, the NORD Rare Disease Summit, and ALD Connect. These data showed that both PXL770
and PXL065 produced significant improvements in disease-associated pathology, providing a rationale
to pursue this indication with either of these molecules or with next generation molecules derived
from both platforms.
PXL065 - ALD
PXL065 offers a potential new approach to treating ALD. In August 2018, the Company acquired
exclusive, worldwide ownership of PXL065 (deuterium-stabilized R-pioglitazone), a clinical-stage
program being pursued for the treatment of NASH, from DeuteRx. As part of the PXL065 acquisition
in 2018, Poxel also acquired additional programs, including other deuterated drug candidates for
metabolic, specialty and rare diseases. The Company fully owns development and commercialization
rights for PXL065.
PXL065 is the R stereoisomer (deuterium stabilized single R-isomer) of pioglitazone, its parent
molecule marketed since 1999 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Pioglitazone is a mixture, in equal
proportions, of two mirror molecules (R and S stereoisomers) that interconvert in vivo. Like all other
products in its class, pioglitazone targets both activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated gamma
receptors (“PPARy”) and modulation of non-genomic targets including inhibition of the mitochondrial
pyruvate carrier (“MPC”) and long chain acyl-CoA synthetase 4 (“ACSL4”).
The parent molecule of PXL065, pioglitazone, was previously reported to mediate neuroprotective
effects in a number of preclinical disease models. Of greater importance, pioglitazone was shown to
produce significant evidence of efficacy in a published report utilizing the classical animal model of
ALD, the ABCD1 null mouse. These data served as the primary impetus to consider PXL065 as a
potential therapeutic candidate for ALD.
In February and April 2022, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation (FTD) to PXL065 and PXL770,
respectively, for the treatment of ALD. FTD is designed to expedite development of pharmaceutical
products which demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs in serious or life-
threatening conditions. FTD provides Poxel with substantially enhanced access to FDA, including
opportunities for face-to-face meetings and written consultations throughout the remaining
development of PXL065. Drugs with FTD are eligible to apply for Accelerated Approval and Priority
Review at the time of a New Drug Application (NDA) submission, which may result in faster product
approval.
The potential of PXL065 in ALD has been evaluated in both C-ALD and AMN in vitro models. The in
vitro studies exposed PXL065 to fibroblasts and lymphocytes from patients within each disease state.
In patient-derived cells, PXL065 normalized elevated VLCFA (specifically C26:0 – the predominant lipid
species causing disease). In parallel, an increase in a compensatory transporter (ABCD2 - messenger
ribonucleic acid, mRNA was evident). Literature reports show that ABCD2 overexpression can correct
aspects of disease mediated by ABCD1 deficiency in mice. Additionally, in patient-derived cells,
mitochondrial function improvements were noted based on increases of oxygen consumption rate. In
Page 24
addition, inflammation was potentially decreased as shown by the reduction of mRNAs encoding
inflammatory mediators. Similar restorative effects were observed in glial cells derived from ABCD1
null mice. Taken together, these in vitro results in patient-derived and knockout mouse cells show
that PXL065 is able to mitigate the main hallmark of ALD disease (by specifically reducing C26:0)
alongside improvements of other disease associated cellular phenotypes.
The potential of PXL065 in ALD has been evaluated in vivo in a well-established, and the most relevant,
animal model for ALD, the ABCD1 null mouse. Given the similarity of features in ABCD1 mice to
humans with ALD (in particular to AMN), experiments focusing on both VLCFA and on additional
phenotypes were conducted. After chronic treatment with PXL065 elevated VLCFA levels were
significantly lowered in plasma, brain, and spinal cord – with evidence of superiority relative to
pioglitazone. Axonal morphology (based on electron microscopy) of sciatic nerve was also improved.
The neuro-behavioural effects of PXL065 were also evaluated. In this context, open field neurologic
test scores for total distance and freezing time showed improvements in animals treated with PXL065,
but not with pioglitazone.
PXL770 – ALD
PXL770 is a direct activator of AMP activated protein kinase (AMPK). Poxel fully owns development
and commercialization rights for PXL770. AMPK is a central regulator of multiple metabolic pathways
leading to the control of lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis and inflammation. Based on its central
metabolic role, the Company believes that targeting AMPK offers the opportunity to pursue a wide
range of indications to treat chronic metabolic diseases, including ALD and diseases that affect the
liver. PXL770 was also evaluated in rodent models of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) which also
assessed cardiac dysfunction. These results demonstrated that AMPK activation may lead to broader
utility for other diseases mediated by metabolic pathway dysfunction.
The cellular energy sensor 5’- adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) has an
important role in regulating the metabolism and function of cells depending on the level of energy
available. Activation of AMPK with small molecules mediates several effects that could be considered
beneficial for ALD; these include inhibition of neural cell apoptosis, enhanced mitochondrial function
and mitochondrial biogenesis, suppression of inflammation, and enhanced (mitochondrial) fatty acid
oxidation. Recent publications also suggest that activation of AMPK has been implicated as a specific
therapeutic strategy in ALD17: AMPK activity is reportedly decreased in the white matter of ALD patient
postmortem brains and AMPK protein is also reduced in ALD human patient-derived fibroblasts and
lymphocytes.
In April 2022, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation (FTD) to PXL770 for the treatment of ALD. FTD
is designed to expedite development of pharmaceutical products which demonstrate the potential to
address unmet medical needs in serious or life-threatening conditions. FTD provides Poxel with
substantially enhanced access to FDA, including opportunities for face-to-face meetings and written
consultations throughout the remaining development of PXL770. Drugs with FTD are eligible to apply
for Accelerated Approval and Priority Review at the time of a New Drug Application (NDA) submission,
which may result in faster product approval. The potential of PXL770 in ALD has been evaluated in
both C-ALD and AMN in vitro models and in vivo using ABCD1 null mice. The in vitro studies exposed
PXL770 to fibroblasts and lymphocytes from patients. In patient-derived cells, PXL770 significantly
reduced VLCFA content. In parallel, an increase in compensatory ABCD2 messenger ribonucleic acid
17 Weidling I. J Neurochem 2016:138:10-13.
Page 25
(mRNA) was evident as was seen with PXL065. In C-ALD patient-derived fibroblasts, defective
mitochondrial function was improved by exposure to PXL770. Incubation of patient-derived
lymphocytes with PXL770 also significantly reduced mRNA species encoding for proinflammatory
proteins. Additional experiments in glial cells derived from ABCD1-knock out mice also showed similar
effects of PXL770 on VLCFA, mitochondrial function and mRNAs for ABCD2 and several pro-
inflammatory genes. The potential of PXL770 in ALD has been evaluated in vivo in the ABCD1 null
mouse. After chronic dosing, PXL770 significantly decreased elevated VLCFA levels in plasma, spinal
cord and brain. Sciatic nerve morphology was also improved as shown by improvements in cell shape
change. The effects of PXL770 on locomotor phenotypes were also evaluated. In this context, PXL770
produced apparent improvements in selected parameters measured in open field neurologic tests. In
balance beam testing, improvements in impaired performance were also evident after chronic PXL770
administration.
Type 2 Diabetes
Diabetes Market Overview
According to the International Diabetes Foundation, in 2021 an estimated 537 million people between
the ages of 20 and 79 are living with diabetes globally (1 in 10), with more than 90% of those affected
having type 2 diabetes. This estimate is predicted to rise to 643 million by 2030 and 783 million by
2045. Diabetes caused at least USD 966 billion in total healthcare expenditures in 2021, a 316%
increase over the last 15 years. Globally, 541 million adults have Impaired Glucose Tolerance, which
places them at high risk of type 2 diabetes.
Decision Resources, an independent market analysis firm, estimates that diabetes treatments
generated sales of over $61.3 billion in 2017 in the United States, Japan, Germany, Italy, the United
Kingdom, France and Spain, which the Company refers to as the G7 countries, and that sales in these
markets are projected to grow to $75.5 billion by 2027. According to Decision Resources, the diabetes
monotherapy treatment market in the G7 countries was approximately $1.7 billion in 2017 (with the
current standard of care, metformin, used for the treatment of approximately 60% of type 2 diabetes
patients in the G7 countries), while the market for new oral combination therapies was approximately
$21.5 billion in 2017 (with sitagliptin accounting for a 46% market share within its class).
Japan
According to Decision Resources, Japan is the second largest diabetes market worldwide, behind the
United States, with a compounded annual growth rate of more than 18% between 2008 and 2012 and
could grow by more than 20% by 2023. According to Decision Resources, estimated sales in Japan are
expected to grow to $4.2 billion by 2020.
There are an increasing number of patients seeking treatment for diabetes in Japan, both type 1 and
type 2, Japan is among the top five countries in Asia for prevalence of diabetes; the latest estimate is
11 million patients18, The Company believes that this market trend is likely to continue, in particular,
given that the Japanese government has identified diabetes as a target disease in its ten-year plan for
National Health Promotion.
18 International Diabetes Federation 2021
Page 26
Imeglimin for Type 2 Diabetes
Poxel’s first product, Imeglimin, was approved in June 2021 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in
Japan and launched in September 2021 as TWYMEEG® by the Company’s partner, Sumitomo Pharma.
Imeglimin is a novel, first-in-class diabetes treatment because it has the ability to target mitochondria
and cellular energy metabolism leading to a dual mechanism of action; to the Company’s knowledge,
there are no approved products or product candidates in advanced development by third parties
which modulate cellular bioenergetics by directly targeting mitochondria for the treatment of
diabetes.
The Company also believes Imeglimin is the only oral compound with a dual mechanism of action
designed to both increase insulin secretion in response to glucose and to reduce insulin resistance. As
a consequence of these effects, the Company believes that Imeglimin has the potential to slow disease
progression and provide therapeutic options to patients who no longer respond to current
treatments. It may also have the potential to complement existing treatments and to decrease the
risk of cardio-renal disease. To date, Imeglimin has been evaluated in 28 clinical trials and
administered to an aggregate of 400 non-diabetic subjects and over 1,800 type 2 diabetes patients.
Imeglimin has been well-tolerated in these trials and the Company has observed statistically
significant reductions of hemoglobin A1c, or HbA1c, and other glycemic parameters versus placebo.
Japan
In Japan, the Company’s partner, Sumitomo Pharma, submitted a Japanese New Drug Application (J-
NDA) in July 2020, which was approved in June 2021, followed by the product commercialization in
September 2021 in Japan.
Commercial Partner – Sumitomo Pharma
In 2017, the Company has entered into a partnership agreement for Imeglimin with Sumitomo
Pharma, for commercialization and development rights in Japan, China and eleven other East and
Southeast Asian countries (see Sections 2.3.2 “Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement" for more details
on this agreement). As per this agreement, the Company has received upfront payments and
payments related to achieving clinical development and regulatory milestones totaling JPY 7.0 billion
(approximately EUR 53 million) between 2017 and 2021. The Company is entitled to receive sales-
based payments up to JPY26.5 billion (approximately EUR 200 million, USD 227 million) and escalating
8-18% royalties on net sales under the Sumitomo Pharma license Agreement. As part of the Merck
Serono licensing agreement (see Sections 2.3.1 “Merck Serono Agreement" for more details on this
agreement), Poxel will pay Merck Serono the first 8% royalty based on the net sales of Imeglimin,
independent of the level of sales. Poxel retains the net royalties above 8%. Based on the current
forecast, the Company expects an 8% royalty rate through Sumitomo Pharma ’s Fiscal Year 2022
(March 2023). Therefore, the royalty stream will be cash neutral until TWYMEEG revenues cross the
first threshold. When TWYMEEG achieves the next commercial threshold, the royalty rate will
increase to the next level for a positive net cash flow to Poxel. Based on the Sumitomo Pharma
forecast submitted to the Japanese pricing authority, the next threshold and sales-based payment
would occur after March 2023. The Company expects to receive double digit royalties for most of the
time of TWYMEEG’s commercial life, after March 2023.
On the July 30, 2020, the Company announced that Sumitomo Pharma had submitted a Japanese New
Drug Application (J-NDA) to the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) to request
approval for the manufacturing and marketing of Imeglimin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes. On
Page 27
June 23, 2021, the Company and Sumitomo Pharma announced the approval of TWYMEEG, the name
for Imeglimin hydrochloride, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan. Japan is the first country
in the world to approve Imeglimin. The approval triggered a JPY1.75 billion (approximately EUR 13.2
million, USD 15.8 million)19 milestone payment to the Company. The product launch of TWYMEEG,
500mg tablets for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan, started September 16, 2021.
United-States & Europe
In the US and Europe, a Phase 2 clinical program for Imeglimin has also been completed, and a Phase
3 plan has been discussed with the FDA. The Company does not intend to advance Imeglimin into a
Phase 3 program in type 2 diabetes alone in the US, Europe and other countries not covered by the
agreement with Sumitomo Pharma but is considering opportunities to leverage the Imeglimin data
package in specific territories, including those resulting from inbound interest.
As of January 31, 2021, the Company regained all rights to Imeglimin in the US, Europe and the other
countries not covered by the partnership agreement with Sumitomo Pharma following the decision
by its former partner, Roivant, not to advance Imeglimin into a Phase 3 program for strategic reasons.
As part of the termination of the agreement, Roivant has also returned to the Company - all data,
materials, and information, including FDA regulatory submissions, related to the program. Roivant
was not entitled to any payment from the Company as part of the return of the program. The
termination of the Roivant License Agreement had no immediate financial consequence for the
Group. The Company conducted and completed a comprehensive evaluation of partnering options in
2021 and does not expect to enter into a broad strategic partnership for the US and Europe in the
near term. The Company is now considering opportunities to leverage the Imeglimin data package in
specific territories, including those resulting from inbound interest.
In the United States and Europe, the Company’s former partner Roivant was initially targeting
development of Imeglimin for treatment of type 2 diabetes patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)
stages 3b/4. Approximately 2.4 million adults in the United States have type 2 diabetes and CKD stages
3b/4, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and these patients have increased
cardiovascular risk and challenging glucose management requirements. Many approved therapies for
type 2 diabetes require dose reduction or are not recommended if a patient has kidney disease. In
addition, insulin and insulin secretagogues (substances that increase insulin secretion) are the most
commonly used therapies but are often used at suboptimal doses to reduce the risk of hypoglycemia,
or low blood sugar. Accordingly, the Company believes that development of Imeglimin for patients
with type 2 diabetes and CKD stages 3b/4 remains a viable and potentially valuable approach.
Clinical Program
In Japan, together with its partner Sumitomo Pharma, the Company has completed the Phase 3 TIMES
clinical program, which was primarily financed by Sumitomo Pharma. This program included three
pivotal trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Imeglimin in approximately 1,100 patients, to
support J-NDA. Results of all phase 3 trials: TIMES 1, TIMES 2, TIMES 3 - 16-weeks, have been disclosed
at scientific meetings and in publications:
(i) in April 2019, the Company announced topline results from the TIMES 1 trial, a randomized, double-
blind, placebo-controlled monotherapy trial with orally administered 1,000 mg of Imeglimin twice-
daily versus placebo for 24 weeks in 213 Japanese patients. The TIMES 1 trial was observed to meet
19 Converted at the exchange rate as of June 21, 2021.
Page 28
its primary endpoint, defined as a change of glycated HbA1c versus placebo at week 24, with a
statistically significant (p<0.0001) HbA1c placebo-corrected mean change from baseline of — 0.87%,
as well as its main secondary endpoint of a decrease from baseline in fasting plasma glucose (“FPG”).
The Company believes that a 0.87% decrease in HbA1c versus placebo in TIMES 1 is clinically relevant
given that a significant number of patients in the TIMES 1 trial treated with Imeglimin achieved an
HbA1C level below 7%, which is the target for type 2 diabetes.
In February 2021, the TIMES 1 publication titled, “Efficacy and Safety of Imeglimin Monotherapy
Versus Placebo in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes (TIMES 1): A Double-Blind, Randomized,
Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Phase 3 Trial” was published in the medical journal
Diabetes Care.
(ii) in June 2019, the Company announced topline results from the first 16-week portion of the TIMES
3 trial, a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized part of the trial that evaluated efficacy and
safety of Imeglimin in combination with insulin in 215 patients of which 108 were treated with
Imeglimin. The first 16-week portion of the TIMES 3 trial achieved statistical significance (p<0.0001)
for its primary endpoint, defined as a change of glycated HbA1c from baseline versus placebo at week
16, with a mean HbA1c placebo-corrected change from baseline of —0.60%.
The Company believes that the -0.60% decrease observed in TIMES 3 in combination with insulin is
also clinically relevant, especially in the context of no increase in hypoglycemia.
(iii) in November 2019, the Company announced topline result from the 36-week, open label
extension period of the TIMES 3 trial, a trial that evaluated efficacy and safety of Imeglimin in
combination with insulin. In this part of the trial, 208 Japanese patients who completed the first 16
weeks of the trial were treated with 1,000 mg of Imeglimin orally twice daily as well as insulin therapy.
The open-label extension period showed a mean HbA1c decrease from baseline of 0.64% in patients
receiving Imeglimin for 52 weeks (Imeglimin and insulin for 16 weeks following by Imeglimin and
insulin for 36 weeks) and 0.54% in patients receiving Imeglimin and insulin for the last 36 weeks only
(placebo and insulin for 16 weeks followed by Imeglimin and insulin for 36 weeks).
In January 2022, the TIMES 3 publication titled, “Efficacy and safety of Imeglimin add-on to insulin
monotherapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes (TIMES 3): A randomized, double-blind,
placebo-controlled phase 3 trial with a 36-week open-label extension period” was published in the
medical journal Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism.
(iv) in December 2019, the Company announced topline results from the 52-week, open label,
parallel-group TIMES 2 trial, a trial that evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of Imeglimin in
714 Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. In this trial, 1,000 mg of Imeglimin was orally administered
twice daily in combination with existing hypoglycemic agents. The TIMES 2 trial, which was open label
and not placebo-controlled, was observed to show an HbA1c decrease from baseline ranging from -
0.57% to -0.92% as an add on to each of seven available oral hypoglycemic classes (a mean decrease
of -0.12% was evident when added to injectable GLP1 receptor agonists).
In particular, Imeglimin was observed to show an HbA1c decrease from baseline of 0.92% versus
baseline as an add on to a DPP-4 inhibitor, the market leader in Japan and prescribed to approximately
80% of treated type 2 diabetes patients in 2016, according to IQVIA.
In December 2021, the TIMES 2 publication titled, Long-term safety and efficacy of Imeglimin as
monotherapy or in combination with existing antidiabetic agents in Japanese patients with type 2
Page 29
diabetes (TIMES 2): A 52-week, open-label, multicentre phase 3 trial” was published in the medical
journal Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism.
Across all three pivotal TIMES trials, Imeglimin was observed to reduce HbA1c as a monotherapy, in
combination with insulin and in combination with existing therapies.
Patents
PXL065
The intellectual property portfolio for PXL065 and other deuterated TZDs contains 8 families of owned
patents and patent applications, including the composition of matter patent, with statutory expiration
dates between 2028 and 2041. Patent term adjustments or patent term extensions could result in
later expiration dates.
PXL770
The intellectual property portfolio for PXL770 and other AMPK activators program contains 14 families
of owned patents and patent applications, including the composition of matter patent with statutory
expiration dates ranging from 2033 to 2041. Patent term adjustments or patent term extensions could
result in later expiration dates.
Imeglimin
The intellectual property portfolio for Imeglimin contains 19 families of patents and patent
applications with statutory expiration dates between 2024 and 2039. In January 2021, one patent
related to the composition of matter of Imeglimin useful for the treatment of diabetes has expired.
Patent term adjustments or patent term extensions could result in later expiration dates. The patent
estate for Imeglimin extends to 2036 (including potential 5-year patent term extension), with other
patent applications ongoing. Patent term extension application have been filed for 5 patent families
in Japan in 2021 in connection with the approval of Imeglimin in this territory in June 2021.
Research and Development
Since its incorporation in 2009, the majority of the Company’s resources have been allocated to
research and development activities. The Company is conducting development activities to expand
the commercial potential of its clinical candidates, PXL770, PXL065, and Imeglimin. In the years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2021, it incurred €26.2 million and €25.1 million, respectively, of research
and development expenses, net of subsidies.
Page 30
2.1.2 The Company’s Strengths
The Company believes that it has the potential to become a leader in the development of novel
treatments for metabolic diseases, including NASH and rare diseases. The Company believes that the
strengths that will enable it to achieve its vision and fulfill its core purposes include the following:
The Company has a proven track record of research and development capabilities to execute
successful clinical trials and regulatory filings.
The Company’s fully owned drug candidates, PXL770 and PXL065, target the large and growing
NASH market that the Company expects to reach $9 billion in treatment revenues by 2025.
The Company is developing two NASH drug candidates offering the potential to be combined
and the Company believes that the heterogeneity of NASH pathophysiology offers the
opportunity for combination approaches.
Leveraging its success and expertise in metabolic clinical development expertise, the Company
believes it is well equipped to become a leader in the rare diseases field, starting with its clinical
programs in ALD.
The Company is entitled to receive sales-based payments and royalties for lmeglimin, which
has been approved for type 2 diabetes and launched as TWYMEEG® in Japan.
-
The Company has a proven track record of research and development capabilities to execute
successful clinical trials and regulatory filings.
Ø The Company has successfully completed all clinical trials related to Imeglimin in Japan to
deliver regulatory approval of the Company’s first product in June 2021. To support the
approval in Japan, the Company completed the Imeglimin Phase 3 program, TIMES, which
included a pivotal program with three clinical trials that evaluated Imeglimin's efficacy and
safety in over 1,100 patients. Statistically significant topline results were reported by the
Company from the Phase 3 TIMES 1 trial, the Phase 2 TIMES 2 trial and the 16-week portion
and the full 36- week of the TIMES 3 trial, each meeting their primary endpoint in 2019.
Imeglimin was also observed to exhibit a safety and tolerability profile across all treatment
arms consistent with prior trials. To date, Imeglimin has been evaluated in 28 clinical trials
and administered to an aggregate of 400 non-diabetic subjects and over 1,800 type 2 diabetes
patients.
Ø PXL770, a first-in-class direct AMPK activator, has successfully completed a Phase 1 program
and a 2a proof-of-concept trial for the treatment of NASH, which met its objectives. The Phase
2a trial, STAMP-NAFLD, was launched in April 2019 and the Company announced positive top-
line results on October 1, 2020. The Phase 2a trial was a 12-week, randomized, parallel group
study, in 120 presumed NASH patients with or without type 2 diabetes. PXL770 was observed
to be generally safe and well tolerated. The safety results from the Phase 2a trial are
Page 31
consistent with the PXL770 PK/PD trial and Phase 1 program. Additionally, a new IND for ALD
was filed and approved.
Ø PXL065, the R stereoisomer (deuterium stabilized single R-isomer) of pioglitazone, has
completed a Phase 1 program including a Phase 1b, multiple ascending dose, double-blind,
randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 30 healthy subjects in 2019 to evaluate the safety,
tolerability and PK profile. A clear increase in relative exposure to the R stereoisomer of
pioglitazone was demonstrated. Based on these results and other clinical and preclinical data,
the Company identified the dosing range that is currently being tested in the ongoing
DESTINY-1 Phase 2 trial. DESTINY-1 completed enrollment on time in September of 2021.
The Company’s fully owned drug candidates, PXL770 and PXL065, target the large and growing
NASH market that the Company expects to reach $9 billion in treatment revenues by 2025.
Ø According to Decision Resources, it is estimated that the NASH market is expected to grow from
$135 million in treatment revenues in 2015 to more than $9 billion by 2025. According to the
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease (NAFLD) is one of the most common liver diseases in the United States. NASH is a
severe form of NAFLD. According to Decision Resources, approximately 4% to 5% of the total
population of the G7 countries suffered from NASH in 2018, representing almost 40 million
people. A scientific publication in 2018 estimated that there were approximately 16.5 million
prevalent NASH cases in the United States in 2015, which is projected to increase by 63% to
27.0 million cases by 2030. The study also estimated that approximately 20% of NAFLD cases
were classified as NASH, which was forecasted to increase to 27% by 2030, a reflection of both
disease progression and an aging population. Given the overlapping prevalence of type 2
diabetes and NASH, the Company also believes that new agents which could ameliorate both
disorders and/or have preferential efficacy for NASH in patients with coexisting type 2
diabetes would be valued additions to the future NASH market.
Ø PXL065, a novel, proprietary deuterium-stabilized R-stereoisomer of pioglitazone, is currently
being evaluated for safety and efficacy for the treatment of NASH in a streamlined Phase 2
trial, DESTINY-1, by leveraging the extensive data of the parent drug, pioglitazone, for an
expedited 505(b)(2) clinical development and regulatory pathway for NASH. Precedent for
this approach has been established with the approval of single stereoisomer drugs, as well as
deuterated drugs, with improved therapeutic properties compared to the parent drug. This
36-week, randomized, dose-ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in
noncirrhotic biopsy-proven NASH patients will assess three doses of PXL065 compared to
placebo. The primary endpoint of the study will measure the relative change in the
percentage of liver fat content based on magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton
density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). The study will also assess the effects of PXL065 on liver
histology and other metabolic and non-metabolic biomarkers. DESTINY-1 completed
enrollment of 123 noncirrhotic biopsy-proven NASH patients across multiple clinical sites in
the US in September 2021, with topline data anticipated in Q3 2022.The results will be used
to help identify optimal dose or doses for a Phase 3 registrational trial.
Page 32
Ø PXL770, a first-in-class direct AMPK activator, has successfully completed a Phase 2a proof-of-
concept trial for the treatment of NASH, which met its objectives. The Phase 2a STAMP-NAFLD
was a 12-week randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial in 120 presumed NASH
patients, with or without diabetes, which evaluated three dosing regimens of PXL770 versus
placebo. The safety results from the Phase 2a trial are consistent with the PXL770 PK/PD trial
and Phase 1 program. AMPK is a central regulator of multiple metabolic pathways and the
Company believes its activation has potential as a mechanism to treat a wide range of chronic
metabolic diseases, including NASH. NASH is a multifactorial and complex disease state and
AMPK activation could play a beneficial role in the metabolic and inflammatory pathways
leading to liver injury. By targeting the underlying root causes of NAFLD (e.g., insulin
resistance) as well as aspects of more advanced disease (e.g., inflammation and fibrogenesis),
the Company believes that PXL770 has the potential to improve the treatment of key
components of this disease, which include liver steatosis, inflammation, ballooning and
fibrosis. PXL770 may also provide benefits to known co-morbidities, including glucose control
in diabetes and those related to cardiovascular disease.
The Company is developing two NASH drug candidates offering the potential to be combined
and the Company believes that the heterogeneity of NASH pathophysiology offers the
opportunity for combination approaches.
Ø Given the heterogeneity of NASH pathophysiology, Poxel believes there is a need for
combination approaches that target multiple pathways in the disease’s progression. The
Company’s two lead products in NASH target distinct pathways, and the Company believes
that the differentiated profile of PXL770, which allosterically activates AMPK to mitigate
metabolic dysfunction, fatty liver accumulation, inflammation and fibrogenesis, and of
PXL065, which targets non-genomic pathways including MPC inhibition to prevent liver
inflammation and fibrosis, are well-suited for use as a combination therapy, if approved. To
this end, Poxel showed in preclinical models the potential to add PXL770 to key agents in
development for the treatment of NASH, including GLP1 agonist, FxR agonist as well as
selective thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist. Additional experiments are currently
underway to assess PXL065 in combination together and with other therapeutic agents
representing distinct mechanisms of action that the Company believes could have additive or
synergistic benefits when used in combinations for the treatment of NASH.
Leveraging its success and expertise in metabolic clinical development expertise, the Company
believes it is well equipped to become a leader in the rare diseases field, starting with its clinical
programs in ALD.
Ø The Company’s management team is composed of experts with extensive experience in type 2
diabetes, related metabolic diseases, and rare diseases. Key members of its team have
experience from Merck Serono, Servier, Eli Lilly and Merck & Co. and were involved in the
discovery, clinical trial designs and regulatory approvals for a number of products prescribed
globally,
including
Glucophage®(metformin),
Trulicity® (dulaglutide)
and
Januvia® (sitagliptin). Members of the company’s R&D leadership team also possess prior
experience in development of therapies for rare diseases (hemophilia, lysosomal storage
diseases and familial hypercholesterolemia). The Company is leveraging its expertise and
Page 33
understanding of cellular energy regulation pathways to expand and advance its clinical
pipeline into rare metabolic diseases.
Ø In rare diseases, the Company is preparing to initiate two Phase 2 proof-of-concept biomarker
clinical studies in the US and Europe for PXL065 and PXL770 in adrenomyeloneuropathy
(AMN), the most common form of ALD. ALD represents a therapeutic area with very high
unmet medical needs due to lack of current therapies. This also provides substantial
commercial opportunity given premium pricing for orphan drugs with similar prevalence and
the possibility to expedite clinical development. The ALD community is very engaged and the
Company has established relationships with Key Opinion Leaders and collaborations with
important patient advocacy groups.
Ø As a result of its business development efforts, the Company secured its pharmaceutical
partnership for Imeglimin leading to Japan and Asia rights with the T2DM market leader in
Japan and acquired PXL065 which the Company is pursuing for metabolic, specialty and rare
diseases.
Ø The Company continues to strengthen its management team, which now combines extensive
experience in clinical research and development and global regulatory affairs with the
business and financial expertise needed for drug development and corporate partnerships.
The Company is continuing to build a world-class metabolic research and development
organization with offices in France, Boston and Tokyo. In addition, the Company’s Scientific
Advisory Board consists of leading ALD, NASH and diabetes diseases experts and its board of
directors includes global experts in the pharmaceutical industry.
The Company is entitled to receive sales-based payments and royalties for lmeglimin, which
has been approved for type 2 diabetes and launched as TWYMEEG® in Japan.
Ø In accordance with the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement, Sumitomo Pharma will pay the
Company sales-based payments depending on net sales thresholds up to an aggregate
amount of ¥26.5 billion (approximately EUR 200 million, USD 227 million), as well as escalating
royalties of 8-18% on net sales of TWYMEEG. As part of the Merck Serono licensing agreement
(see Sections 2.3.1 “Merck Serono Agreement" for more details on this agreement), Poxel will
pay Merck Serono the first 8% royalty based on the net sales of Imeglimin, independent of
the level of sales. Poxel retains the net royalties above 8%. Based on the current forecast, the
Company expects an 8% royalty rate through Sumitomo’s Pharma Fiscal Year 2022 (March
2023). Therefore, the royalty stream will be cash neutral until TWYMEEG revenues cross the
first threshold. When TWYMEEG achieves the next commercial threshold, the royalty rate will
increase to the next level for a positive net cash flow to Poxel. Based on the Sumitomo Pharma
forecast submitted to the Japanese pricing authority, the next threshold and sales-based
payment would occur after March 2023. The Company expects to receive double digit
royalties for most of the time of TWYMEEG’s commercial life, after March 2023.
Page 34
2.1.3 The Company’s Strategy
The Company’s goal is to develop and commercialize innovative therapies for the treatment of
metabolic diseases, including NASH and rare metabolic diseases. To achieve its goal, the Company is
pursuing the following strategies:
Develop the two clinical candidates, PXL065 and PXL770, each with potential benefits in both
NASH and ALD, and select one candidate to advance in each indication.
Explore combination strategies for PXL770 and PXL065 for the treatment of NASH.
Increased focus on rare metabolic diseases with the objective to advance and expand the
Company’s clinical pipeline of rare metabolic disease programs.
Build a metabolic franchise through expanding the portfolio by discovering, developing or
acquiring additional drug candidates and technologies.
Advance lmeglimin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes to commercialization (outside Japan)
with strategic partners.
Maximize the commercial potential of the Company’s wholly owned assets and
opportunistically enter into strategic collaborations.
-
Develop the two clinical candidates, PXL065 and PXL770, each with potential benefits in both
NASH and ALD, and select one candidate to advance in each indication.
Ø In NASH, the Company made significant progress in the development of PXL065 through a
streamlined Phase 2 trial (DESTINY-1). Enrollment was completed in September 2021. Topline
results are expected in the third quarter of 2022. This Phase 2, 36-week trial in noncirrhotic
biopsy-proven NASH patients will assess three doses of PXL065 compared to placebo in 123
patients. The results will be used to help identify the dose or doses for a Phase 3 registration
trial. Based on preclinical results and the Phase la trial, the Company believes PXL065 may
have a superior therapeutic and tolerability profile compared to pioglitazone, its parent
molecule, in the treatment of NASH. PXL065 is derived from pioglitazone (deuterium-
stabilized R-pioglitazone), a drug that is approved for T2DM and has been the subject of
several advanced trials for the treatment of NASH. Based on the Company’s pre-
investigational new drug meeting with the FDA in the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company
plans to develop PXL065 with a registration program using a 505(b)(2) pathway (a regulatory
process available to new drug candidates modifying a pharmaceutical product already
approved by the FDA), which has the potential for expedited development.
Ø In rare metabolic diseases, the Company is investigating the potential of PXL065 and PXL770 in
ALD (X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy) and preparing to initiate two identical Phase 2a clinical
POC biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN), the most
Page 35
common form of the disease. These two studies are planned to initiate midyear 2022,
followed by data in early 2023.
Ø The initiation of the NASH Phase 2b trial for PXL770 will be postponed, pending results from
the ongoing PXL065 Phase 2 trials in NASH and both Phase 2a biomarker studies in AMN.
Explore combination strategies for PXL770 and PXL065 for the treatment of NASH.
Ø Given the mechanistic heterogeneity of NASH, the Company believes there is a need for
combination approaches that target multiple pathways in the disease's progression. The
Company’s two lead products in NASH target distinct pathways, and the Company believes
that the differentiated profiles of PXL770, which allosterically activates AMPK to address both
metabolic dysfunction and inflammation, and of PXL065, which acts through non-genomic
pathways to attenuate liver inflammation, steatosis and fibrosis, are well-suited for use as a
combination therapy.
Increased focus on rare metabolic diseases with the objective to advance, accelerate and
expand the Company’s clinical pipeline of rare metabolic disease programs.
Ø The decision to focus new programs on rare diseases was the output of an extensive strategic
review and analysis of therapeutic focus areas that aligned with the Company’s strengths,
resources and capabilities. Rare disease indications represent the intersection of high unmet
medical needs, pre-clinical and clinical data, opinion leader enthusiasm, significant
commercial opportunity, and attractive time horizons. Rare diseases have high unmet medical
needs with limited treatment options and more than 90% of rare diseases are without an FDA
approved treatment20. Rare disease drug development is generally associated with lower
costs, faster timelines, more favorable regulatory environments, and hence higher probability
of success. The market opportunity for rare diseases is substantial (almost 1 in 10 people have
rare diseases)21, supported by premium pricing as demonstrated in prior orphan drug
approvals. Lastly, the Company has the capability to commercialize the Company‘s products
in rare diseases on its own, allowing the Company to capture greater economics versus
partnering with a larger company.
Ø As more than 1,100 rare diseases have a metabolic basis, this area is a strong scientific fit with
the Company’s expertise and understanding of cellular energy regulation pathways related to
metabolic diseases. The D-TZD and AMPK approaches modulate pathways driving multiple
diseases. The Company is developing close connections with relevant patient advocacy groups
and KOLs to better understand the clinical and regulatory landscape in each rare disease,
starting with ALD.
Ø The Company has the capacity to opportunistically pursue additional external rare disease
programs to expand its preclinical and clinical pipeline.
21 Genetic and Rare Diseases Information Center; National Ctr. Advancing Trans Sciences; FAQs About Rare
Page 36
Build a metabolic franchise through expanding the portfolio by discovering, developing or
acquiring additional drug candidates and technologies.
Ø Given its extensive expertise in metabolic diseases, as well as the management team's
experience in drug development, the Company intends to develop additional compounds in
its pipeline and is currently evaluating direct AMPK activation and deuterium modified
thiazolidinediones for the treatment of additional metabolic, specialty and rare diseases. New
data showing preclinical efficacy of PXL770 in an animal model of diabetes-induced kidney
and heart disease were also presented at EASD in September 2020. The Company believes
that these mechanisms, as monotherapies or in combination with other agents, have the
potential to provide broad treatment of these or other diseases with an underlying metabolic
basis. The Company owns rights in additional compounds that could be the basis for new
drugs and it is planning to explore selectively bringing them forward to the market. In
addition, the Company may acquire or in-license additional compounds or technologies for
the treatment of metabolic diseases through continued business development efforts.
Advance lmeglimin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes to commercialization (outside Japan)
with strategic partners.
Ø In October 2017, the Company signed a strategic agreement with Sumitomo Pharma for the
development and commercialization of Imeglimin in Japan, China, South Korea, Taiwan,
Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Myanmar, Cambodia, and
Laos. On June 23rd, 2021, the Company and Sumitomo Pharma announced the approval of
TWYMEEG, the name for Imeglimin hydrochloride, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in
Japan. Japan is the first country in the world to approve Imeglimin. The product launch of
TWYMEEG, 500mg tablets for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan, started September
16, 2021. Based on the JP-CPP (Certificate of a Pharmaceutical Product), Sumitomo Pharma is
actively working on its plan to register Imeglimin in other Sumitomo Pharma territories and
will adapt its strategy according to what the regulation requires and the opportunity/market
size for each geography. In Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Sumitomo Pharma will
be able to leverage the data generated in Japan. For Taiwan, South Korea, Indonesia, Vietnam,
Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, small bridging studies, in addition to the data generated in Japan,
will be required for regulatory approval. In China, where the market potential is second to
Japan, a larger Phase 2/3 program may be required.
Ø In the United States and Europe, Roivant, a former partner of the Company, was initially
targeting type 2 diabetes patients with CKD stages 3b/4. Roivant met with regulatory
authorities to discuss Imeglimin as a treatment option for patients with type 2 diabetes and
CKD stages 3b/4. A meeting with the FDA occurred in the first quarter of 2020 to discuss the
Phase 3 plan and trial designs in the United States and the FDA provided feedback for
Imeglimin in the US. The partnership agreement with Roivant is terminated January 31, 2021,
and Roivant returned all rights to Imeglimin to the Company, as well as all data, materials,
and information, including FDA regulatory filings, related to the program. The Company does
not intend to advance Imeglimin into a Phase 3 program in type 2 diabetes alone in the US,
Page 37
Europe and other countries not covered by the agreement with Sumitomo Pharma. The
Company conducted and completed a comprehensive evaluation of partnering options in
2021 and does not expect to enter into a broad strategic partnership for the US and Europe
in the near term. The Company is now considering opportunities to leverage the Imeglimin
data package in specific territories, including those resulting from inbound interest.
Maximize the commercial potential of the Company’s wholly owned assets and
opportunistically enter into strategic collaborations.
Ø The Company will continue to evaluate opportunities to collaborate with leading
biopharmaceutical companies that may advance and accelerate the development and
potential commercialization of the Company’s drug candidates. In addition, the Company may
enter into licensing agreements or co-marketing agreements with one or more collaborators
to develop and commercialize its drug candidates.
2.1.4 PXL770 and PXL065 - Two Novel Drug-Candidates to treat patients with NASH
NASH Overview
NASH is a chronic and serious liver disease caused by an excessive accumulation of fat in the liver, and
steatosis, which induces inflammation that can gradually lead to fibrosis and liver cirrhosis. This state
when it breaks down can lead to the shutdown of liver functions and cause the death of most severely
affected patients. Other conditions, such as obesity and type 2 diabetes, present in most patients
suffering from NASH, are all important risk factors. The scientific community recognizes that NASH is
linked, both in developed countries and those in the process of development, to the Western diet and
increased consumption of refined products containing polyunsaturated fatty acids and fructose. The
main symptoms of NASH include liver steatosis, inflammation and ballooning of liver cells, fibrosis and
metabolic disorders. NASH is a severe form of NAFLD.
The following diagram sets forth the evolution of NAFLD and NASH, as well as the main symptoms.
Page 38
NASH Development Pipeline and Limitations
The diagnosis of NASH is complex, and it is often made by default. Most patients are diagnosed based
on blood tests revealing abnormal liver function tests, or liver steatosis in imaging exams. There is no
approved treatment for NASH. The standard treatment consists of lifestyle changes intended to
encourage physical exercise and diet modification to reduce weight, but no effective therapy to
prevent disease course has been demonstrated yet.
The most commonly prescribed therapeutic solutions, such as the administration of antioxidants,
antidiabetic treatments to reduce insulin resistance in the body and liver gluconeogenesis,
antihyperlipidemic agents aim to improve the most common comorbidities, such as obesity and type
2 diabetes, and to reduce the risk of complications, such as CV disease or certain forms of cancer, such
as hepatocellular carcinoma.
While the precise causes of the disease are still poorly understood, the various components of the
pathogenesis of NASH all represent topics for research and processes that can be exploited for the
development of new therapeutic targets.
Preclinical data for PXL770, a direct AMPK activator, and PXL065, a modulator of non-genomic targets
including inhibition of the mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC) and long chain acyl-CoA synthetase 4
(ACSL4), have been observed to correlate with beneficial effects for the treatment of NASH, by
reducing key hepatic disease-related parameters. These include: steatosis, ballooning, inflammation
and fibrosis in animal models. In both Phase 1b and Phase 2a studies, PXL770 has also been observed
to produce pharmacodynamic effects that are potentially predictive of longer term benefits in NASH.
In addition, in clinical studies to date, both PXL770 and PXL065 were observed to be well-tolerated.
The preclinical data show the potential for broad beneficial treatment effects for PXL770 and PXL065,
as well as a potentially acceptable tolerability profile in comparison to other mechanism of actions.
The Company believes that PXL770 and PXL065 can be distinguished from other compounds under
development for liver diseases by their mechanisms of action.
The therapeutic efficacy of pioglitazone, a drug approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, has
been demonstrated for the treatment of NASH, including in patients with advanced fibrosis. However,
its PPARy receptor-related adverse effects, such as weight gain, bone fractures and fluid retention,
limit its therapeutic use for many patients.
The Company's Market Opportunity: NASH
With no approved drug treatments, NASH can lead to life-threatening conditions like cirrhosis, liver
failure, liver cancer and death. NASH is considered one of the main causes of cirrhosis in adults. Cases
of liver cirrhosis related to NASH are the second leading cause of liver transplants in the United States
and are expected in the next few years to become the leading cause of transplantation, ahead of
hepatitis C and alcoholic cirrhosis.
A study published in 2018 estimated that there were approximately 16.5 million prevalent NASH cases
in the United States in 2015, which is projected to increase by 63% to 27.0 million cases by 2030. The
study also estimated that approximately 20% of NAFLD cases were classified as NASH, which was
forecasted to increase to 27% by 2030, a reflection of both disease progression and an aging
population. In 2015, there were an estimated 370,000 deaths among the NASH population, equivalent
to 29% of total NAFLD deaths, which is projected to increase to almost 40% of deaths among NAFLD
Page 39
cases, or 716,800 annual deaths by 2030. In addition, approximately 40-50% of NASH patients have
coexisting T2DM22 and patients with type 2 diabetes are often afflicted with NASH (estimated 26%)23.
According to Decision Resources, up to 6% of the total population of the G7 countries suffered from
NASH in 2018, representing almost 40 million people. In developing countries, such as China and India,
NASH has become a liver disease with a high prevalence. It is recognized that in approximately 20%
of patients with NASH, the disease worsens and progresses to the level of liver cirrhosis in the ten
years following diagnosis.
The diagram below sets forth details of the NASH patient population in the United States, EU5
(Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, France and Spain), China and Japan by geography (in millions of
patients).
Source: Based on a LEK analysis for Poxel, 2019
Given that no product is currently approved for NASH, various products are used off-label, targeting
symptoms and conditions associated with NASH such as type 2 diabetes, insulin resistance and
dyslipidemia. The following diagram sets forth details of the patient share of NASH drug classes, by
market, in 2015.
22 Younossi ZM et al; Hepatology 2016.
23 Cusi et al, Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; Portillo/Cusi et al, J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015.
Page 40
Source: Decision Resources, September 2019
According to Decision Resources, the NASH market is expected to increase from $135 million in 2015
to more than $9 billion by 2025, driven by entry of the first novel therapies indicated for NASH into
the market (see Section 2.1.8 “Competition”).
Poxel’s NASH Drug Candidates — PXL065 and PXL770
PXL065
PXL065, which the Company acquired pursuant to a strategic agreement with DeuteRx, offers a new
approach to the treatment of NASH. PXL065 is the deuterated-stabilized R stereoisomer (single R-
isomer) of pioglitazone, its parent molecule, which has been marketed for the treatment of type 2
diabetes since 1999.
Pioglitazone is a mixture, in equal proportions, of two mirror molecules (R and S stereoisomers) that
interconvert in vivo. Like all other products in its class, pioglitazone targets both inhibition of the MPC
and activation of PPARy. Pioglitazone has been the subject of a large number of clinical trials for the
treatment of NASH, which have demonstrated pioglitazone's ability to target disease resolution
(based on NAS score) and to also improve fibrosis. Pioglitazone is the only drug recommended in
quidelines of the AASLD and is the only drug product identified in potential treatment by the EASL for
the treatment of biopsy-confirmed cases of NASH. However, its use is restricted due to the adverse
effects associated with the activation of PPARy receptors, such as weight gain, bone fractures and
fluid retention.
PXL065, the R-stereoisomer, has little or no observed PPARy activity and mediates its effects
selectively via non-genomic pathways including MPC and ACSL4 inhibition. In contrast the S-
stereoisomer of pioglitazone is a potent PPARy agonist which is responsible for weight gain and fluid
retention in animals. Preclinical models have shown activity of PXL065 in NASH that is similar to
pioglitazone with little or no weight gain or fluid retention.
Page 41
Clinical Development
In September 2021, Company announced the completion of enrollment in the Phase 2 NASH trial for
PXL065 (DESTINY 1) in biopsy-proven patients which initiated enrollment in September 2020. Topline
data from this Phase 2 NASH trial is anticipated in Q3 2022. DESTINY 1 (Deuterium-stabilized R-
pioglitazone (PXL065) Efficacy and Safety Trial In NASH) is a Phase 2 36-week, randomized, dose-
ranging, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study designed to assess the efficacy and
safety of three doses of PXL065 in 123 noncirrhotic biopsy-proven NASH patients across multiple
clinical sites in the US. The primary endpoint of the study will measure the relative change in the
percentage of liver fat content based on magnetic resonance imaging-estimated proton density fat
fraction (MRI-PDFF). The study will also assess the effects of PXL065 on liver histology and other
metabolic and non-metabolic biomarkers. The results will be used to help identify the dose or doses
for a Phase 3 registrational trial.
Based on the Company’s pre-investigational new drug meeting with the FDA in the fourth quarter of
2019, the Company plans to pursue the 505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for PXL065, which has the
potential for expedited development.
A Phase lb double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial aimed at evaluating the safety and the
PK profile of the drug candidate after repeated administration of PXL065 was initiated in September
2019. In December 2019, the Company announced results from this multiple ascending dose, double-
blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 30 healthy subjects to evaluate the safety, tolerability
and PK profile of PXL065 administered as tablets. The trial was observed to show dose proportionality
at all doses tested and the safety profile was also acceptable. The diagrams below show the different
exposure to R-pioglitazone (right panel) and S-pioglitazone (left panel) when subjects received
repeated administration of pioglitazone versus several dose of PXL065. 15 mg PXL065 dose yields
similar R-pioglitazone exposure but S-pioglitazone exposure decreased by ~5-fold compared to 45 mg
Actos®.
Source: Poxel.
In April 2019, the Company also announced the completion of Phase la trials. The results showed a
similar PK profile as later observed in the multiple dose study described above. In this trial, PXL065
was also well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events. PK-PD modeling predicts that a 15 mg dose
of PXL065 should provide the same exposure to R-pioglitazone as a 45 mg dose of pioglitazone. The
PK results and simulations in humans, associated with preclinical animal studies, also suggest that
Page 42
PXL065 could potentially have the same efficacy on NASH as pioglitazone, but with fewer PPARy
receptor-related adverse effects, such as weight gain and fluid retention.
Preclinical Development
Preclinical data have highlighted key aspects related to the PK and PD roles of stereoisomers belonging
to the class of TZDs as well as their potential relevance for the treatment of NASH. Representatives of
TZDs include rosiglitazone, pioglitazone and lobeglitazone, all being mixtures of R and S stereoisomers
exhibiting interconversion between each stereoisomer.
The main observations presented from the preclinical data were: (i) all TZDs are racemic mixtures and
the enantiomer undergo interconversion; (ii) unexpected differences in activity on PPARy when
comparing the S- (PPARy active) to R-(little or no PPARy activity) stereoisomers; and (iii) the
stabilization of the stereoisomers of pioglitazone by deuterium substitution to characterize and
identify R-pioglitazone as the stereoisomer of choice for NASH or ALD treatment.
Preclinical data showed that each stereoisomer of pioglitazone and its active metabolites have
different PPARy activity. Other data showed that PXL065, like other thiazolidinediones (TZDs) is an
inhibitor of MPC and ACSL4, but has little or no observed PPARy activity in a cofactor recruitment
assay (figure below). Studies of PXL065 in murine NASH models have observed liver benefits that are
similar to pioglitazone. In preclinical models, PXL065 was associated with reduced or no weight gain
and fluid retention, these adverse effects being mainly associated with the S-stereoisomer of
pioglitazone that acts on the PPARy receptor.24
PXL065: Deuterium Modification Yields Selective Actions via Non-Genomic Pathways – Potential to
Retain Efficacy with Reduced PPARy Side Effects
Source:Poxel.
The diagram below shows the effect of PXL065 on inhibition of MPC and PPARy agonism. PXL065,
PXL064 (d-S-pio) and pioglitazone reduced pyruvate-driven mitochondrial maximal respiration, as
measured by oxygen consumption rate in HepG2 cells, to the same extent. Pioglitazone and PXL064
were shown to bind to PPARy and behave as PPARy agonists, while PXL065 showed little binding and
24 Jacques V. Hepatol Comm. 2021; 5:1412-25.
Page 43
no PPARy agonist activity at concentrations up to 100 µM. In separate ACSL4 experiments, the activity
of pioglitazone as an inhibitor was also preserved with PXL065 (and PXL064).
Source: Poxel;Jacques V. Hepatol Comm.2021; 5:1412-25.
In addition, PXL065 was observed to have similar activity as pioglitazone in NASH mouse models. In
particular, the PXL065 was observed to be as active as pioglitazone on the NAS score as well as on
fibrosis.
These results confirm the role of non-genomic pathway modulation as an important contributor to
the efficacy of pioglitazone in NASH, as shown in the diagram below.
Source: Poxel; Jacques V. Hepatol Comm. 2021; 5:1412-25.
PXL770
The Company believes that PXL770 has the potential to be a first-in-class drug candidate as a direct
activator of AMPK. AMPK is a central regulator of multiple metabolic pathways leading to the control
of lipid metabolism, glucose homeostasis and inflammation. Based on its central metabolic role, the
Company believes that targeting AMPK offers the opportunity to pursue a wide range of indications
to treat chronic metabolic diseases, including diseases that affect the liver, such as NASH. Activation
of the AMPK enzyme is interesting because it could have benefits on the main pathophysiologic
processes occurring in the liver and leading to NASH: steatosis, inflammation, ballooning and fibrosis.
Activation of AMPK plays a key role in the regulation of each component of NASH:
Page 44
Steatosis: AMPK regulates energy homeostasis and adjusts the available energy at the cellular
level by promoting processes that generate energy (such as oxidation of fatty acids) and by
stopping processes that consume energy (such as lipid production).
Inflammation: AMPK changes the polarization of macrophages and decreases the production of
pro-inflammatory cytokines.
Ballooning: AMPK regulates mitochondrial function and integrity, thus protecting liver cell
function and survival. Activation of AMPK has also been shown to protect hepatocytes from cell
death.
Fibrosis: AMPK reduces (i) activation of stellate cells responsible for the secretion of collagen
fibers that form scar tissue and lead to fibrosis and (ii) secretion of the extracellular matrix in the
liver.
By directly targeting the primary regulator of cellular energy, the Company believes that PXL770 is
well positioned for the treatment of NASH. In particular, based on clinical trials and preclinical studies
to date, PXL770 has been observed to:
improve sensitivity to insulin and normalize elevated glucose;
inhibit the two main sources of steatosis, DNL and lipolysis;
reduce inflammation in the liver and fat tissue;
reduce profibrogenic pathways leading to fibrosis;
The Company believes that PXL770, if approved, has the potential to be prescribed as monotherapy
and in combination with other therapies under development in NASH that target other components
of the disease, such as thyroid receptor b agonists.
Clinical Development
In October 2020, positive results from the Phase 2a proof-of-concept NASH Trial with PXL770 were
released. The Company launched this Phase 2a proof-of-concept program in April 2019, based on the
results of the Phase lb trial and the tolerability profile observed in the Phase la single ascending dose
trial. The STAMP-NAFLD study was a 12-week, randomized, controlled trial in 120 likely NASH patients,
with or without Type 2 diabetes (T2DM), which evaluated three dosing regimens of PXL770 versus
placebo. In the per protocol analysis, PXL770 produced a significant reduction in relative liver fat
content (-18%; p=0.004) at the highest dose. In patients with T2DM (41-47% of each group), the
treatment with PXL770 produced disproportionate efficacy; a -27% mean relative reduction in liver
fat content at 500 mg QD (p=0.004) versus baseline was observed. In further analysis of this
subpopulation of T2DM patients, findings included greater increases in the proportion of responders
(>30% reduction in liver fat); and more substantial mean decreases in alanine transaminase (ALT) and
aspartate transaminase (AST) levels despite slightly elevated mean baseline ALT levels (36-47 IU/L;
normal range <41 IU/L). Although baseline fasting glucose (121-144 mg/dL) and HbA1c (6.6-7.1%)
levels were well controlled in this population, significant placebo-adjusted decreases were observed
in both glycemic parameters along with improvements in commonly used fasting indexes of insulin
sensitivity (HOMA-IR and QUICKI scores). In both the whole population and in the T2DM
subpopulation, PXL770 was generally safe and well tolerated and the number of total treatment-
emergent adverse events (TEAS) was similar to placebo. Conclusions from the STAMP-NAFLD trial are
summarized below.
Page 45
PXL770 has potential to treat both NASH and T2DM and might also be expected to achieve greater
NASH efficacy in patients with both disorders. The clinical overlap between NASH and T2DM is
substantial and patients with both disorders are at greater risk as summarized in the chart below.
Based on the results of the Phase 2a trial, as well as other results and published literature, the
Company is considering initiation of a 52-week Phase 2b trial in non-cirrhotic biopsy-proven NASH
patients with coexisting prediabetes or T2DM. Such a trial could evaluate up to two oral daily doses
of PXL770 compared to placebo in approximately 100 patients per study arm. The primary endpoint
Page 46
of the trial would be NASH resolution with no worsening of fibrosis as assessed by histology. The Phase
2b trial would also evaluate efficacy on other histology endpoints (fibrosis), and assess metabolic and
non-metabolic parameters, pharmacokinetics, as well as safety and tolerability.
The initiation of the NASH Phase 2b trial for PXL770 has been postponed, pending results from the
ongoing PXL065 Phase 2 trials in NASH and both Phase 2a biomarker studies in AMN.
Following a potential Ph2b trial, the Phase 3 program would be discussed with the FDA and the
European Medicine Agency (the “EMA”).
In August 2019, the Company initiated a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) trial to
confirm target engagement and PXL770’s PK profile in a population of likely NASH patients. This study
included non-diabetic subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) that were treated for 4
weeks with 500 mg QD of PXL770 (n=12) vs. placebo (n=4). Statistically significant suppression of
fructose-stimulated DNL was observed – confirming target engagement in human as well as the
reduction in one key cause of steatosis. In addition, improved glycaemia and indices of insulin
sensitivity were observed. The chart below summarizes the Phase I Program for PXL770.
In July 2018, the Company announced results of its two-part Phase lb trial of PXL770, consisting of a
trial with multiple ascending doses and a drug interaction trial. The multiple ascending doses trial was
conducted in 48 subjects to evaluate the safety, tolerability and PK of PXL770 administered once or
twice daily for 10 days, with six dose groups ranging from 60 mg to 500 mg. No serious adverse events
and no adverse events leading to discontinuation of the trial in subjects were observed in this trial.
PXL770 was well-tolerated. In this trial, an electrocardiogram (“ECG”), was performed at each dose,
and PXL770 was not associated with any prolongation of the QT interval, which is a cardiac safety
measurement, or any changes in other ECG parameters. The PK parameters of PXL770 were linear
with a saturation tendency at the highest dose tested.
In addition to the trial with multiple ascending doses, a drug interaction trial was also conducted with
rosuvastatin. In this trial, 12 subjects received 250 mg of PXL770 and a standard dose of rosuvastatin
Page 47
once daily. There were no observed PK interactions between PXL770 and OATP transporter
substrates. A 14C-ADME study was also conducted in 6 subjects, showing that PXL770 has an
appropriate distribution, metabolism and excretion pattern in human.
Preclinical Development
In February 2018, the Company announced the presentation of results of animal proof-of-concept
experiments in which PXL770 was evaluated as a new therapeutic approach for the potential
treatment and improvement of NAFLD or NASH. These results were published in 2021. 25
PXL770 treatment in a classical animal model of NASH was observed to increase the activity of AMPK
in the liver and to produce effects on all major components of liver disease including: reduced liver
fat (steatosis), reduced inflammation and ballooning, reduced markers of fibrosis. PXL770 also
lowered elevated levels of ALT plus AST which are liver derived biomarkers that indirectly measure
the degree of liver cell damage. In additional experiments, beneficial effects of PXL770 on human
immune cells and human stellate cells (the main driver of liver fibrosis) were observed.
PXL770 – Effects on NASH Histology in a Diet-Induced Rodent Model
Source: Poxel.
The diagrams below set forth details of the effect of PXL770 on indices of fibrosis.
PXL770 – Effects on Fibrogenesis in a Diet-Induced Rodent Model
25 Gluais-Dagorn P. Hepatol Comm 2021; 0:1-19.
Page 48
Source:Poxel.
Additional animal models were employed to show the beneficial effects of PXL770 treatment on
insulin sensitivity and on hyperglycemia.
The Company believes that these studies support the potential of PXL770 for the treatment of liver
metabolic diseases, as well as other metabolic disorders, such as type 2 diabetes.
Manufacturing and Supply
PXL065
The active substance PXL065 is manufactured from pioglitazone. PXL065 was initially formulated as
an immediate release capsule and available in three dosage strengths: 7.5 mg, 22.5 mg and 30 mg. An
immediate release tablet formulation was later developed, with two proposed dosage strengths: 7.5
mg and 15 mg. A group of specialized subcontractors manages the molecule synthesis and finished
product manufacturing and control, as well as batch certification for clinical use. The Company
believes the manufacturing process for immediate-release capsules and tablets can support
manufacturing of batches of sufficient size to perform Phase 2 studies. Scale-up is ongoing to support
Phase 3 clinical supply.
PXL770
The active substance PXL770 is manufactured according to a synthetic pathway in several stages. This
process has been optimized to reduce the number of synthesis steps and allow sufficient batch size
for clinical supply in accordance with GMP.
PXL770 was initially formulated as an immediate release capsule available in three different dosage
strengths: 30 mg, 125 mg and 250 mg. An immediate release tablet formulation was then developed,
with three proposed dosage strengths: 125 mg, 250 mg, and 375 mg. PXL770 is a stable active
substance and the finished product has a shelf life of up to 36 months (depending on formulation and
packaging used). PXL770's long shelf life has been observed during long-term stability studies in
accordance with ICH recommendations. A group of specialized subcontractors manages this molecule
synthesis and finished product manufacturing and control, as well as batch certification for clinical
use. The Company believes the manufacturing process for immediate-release capsules and tablets
can support manufacturing of batches of sufficient size to perform clinical trials up to Phase 2b.
2.1.5 PXL770 and PXL065 - Two Novel Drug-Candidates to treat patients with ALD
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) Overview
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy – ALD – is a deadly, inherited rare metabolic disease characterized by
neurodegeneration. ALD is a monogenic inborn error of metabolism due to mutations in the ABCD1
Page 49
gene which encodes a key cellular fatty acid transporter – this defect results in accumulation of very
long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) with resulting damage to several tissues in particular neurons.
ALD is increasingly being diagnosed based on the recent and broad-based adoption of newborn
screening. Thus, the prevalence of ALD is similar to hemophilia or spinal muscular atrophy – about
20,000 in the US alone.26 Globally it may affect more than 400,000 people.
Forms of this disease include cerebral ALD (C-ALD) and adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN) which is the
most common form – typically occurring in adolescence through adulthood. AMN is characterized by
chronic and progressive distal axonopathy involving the long tracts of the spinal cord and to a lesser
extent the peripheral nerves resulting in progressive stiffness and weakness in the legs, impaired gait
and balance, incontinence, and loss of sensation. As an X-linked disease, nearly all men with a
diagnosis of ALD will develop AMN and are more severely affected, but many women also present
with features of AMN with a later onset. C-ALD is characterized by inflammatory demyelination of
cells in the brain and typically afflicts children, but many men with AMN may also develop cerebral
disease; these white matter brain lesions lead to severe neurologic deficits and death.
There are currently no approved medicines for ALD (other than glucocorticoid supplements for
associated adrenal insufficiency). Cerebral-ALD (C-ALD), when first detected in early childhood, can
be treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but it is currently limited to early stage of C-
ALD and this procedure is at risk of severe adverse reactions.
26 Bezman L. Am J Med Genet. 1998; 76:415-19.; Matteson J. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7:22
Page 50
The Company's Market Opportunity: ALD
The Company believes the market opportunity in ALD is highly compelling given these market
attributes:
ALD represents an area of very high unmet medical needs due to lack of current therapies. Filling
an unmet medical need is defined by the FDA as providing a therapy where none exists or
providing a therapy which may be potentially better than available therapy.
In the US, ALD affects approximately 20,000-29,000 individuals. Globally, the prevalence of ALD is
444,000 – 644,000.
There is a track record of approved treatments for orphan diseases with similar prevalence that
have been commercially successful.
ALD is increasingly being diagnosed based on the recent and broad-based adoption of newborn
screening.
Clinical development may be expedited due to the established safety profiles of PXL065 (with
505b2) and PXL770 that may mitigate risk and reduce clinical development timelines.
Data from ALD preclinical models for PXL065 and PXL770 suggest significant impact on key
biomarkers (such as VLCFA) and other measures are available to assess the disease progression
and the effect of PXL065 and PXL770 on this progression. The clinical plan has the potential to
seek accelerated approval based upon biomarkers and/or intermediate clinical measurements.
The Company has established relationships with Key Opinion Leaders and collaborations with key
patient advocacy groups that represent the ALD patient community and are highly engaged in
clinical trials.
ALD provides a number of regulatory paths that may expedite clinical development. In Europe,
Orphan designation provides 10 years market exclusivity and PRIME designation supports the
development of medicines that target an unmet medical need and allows enhanced interaction
and early dialogue to optimize development plans and speed up evaluation so the medicine can
reach patients earlier. In the US, potential regulatory designations include:
-
Orphan Drug status which confers 7 years of market exclusivity
-
Fast Track status with the objective to expedite development of pharmaceutical products
which demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs in serious or life-
threatening conditions, providing the key benefit of enhanced access to the FDA, with
regular and more frequent opportunities for consultation and discussion
-
-
Breakthrough Therapy is granted to accelerate the development and review of drugs
for a serious condition where preliminary clinical evidence indicates a substantial
improvement over available therapy on a clinically significant endpoint(s)
Priority Review in which the standard 10-month review process is reduced to six months
Poxel's ALD Drug Candidates — PXL770 and PXL065
Both PXL065 and PXL770 have the potential to target ALD pathophysiology; this could include
suppression of elevated VLCFA, specifically saturated C26:0 fatty acid, the primary driver of disease.
In addition, downstream pathologies such as inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction could be
ameliorated. Net effects could include reduced axonal degeneration for both cerebral and spinal cord
disease.
Importantly, multiple recent publications support the utility of both AMPK activation and TZD-related
pathways for the treatment of ALD. The Company has developed evidence to show that both its
platforms, AMPK activation and D-TZDs, can be leveraged to address this pathophysiology and to
Page 51
correct the primary defect by suppressing VLCFA levels and by potentially ameliorating downstream
consequences that include mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation and cell death.
Both PXL065 and PXL770 mediate neurologic benefits. The Company has studied both of its lead
molecules in classical ALD preclinical models, patient derived-cells and the ABCD1 null mouse. In these
data, it has been observed that both compounds produced substantial reductions in VLCFA both in
vitro and in vivo, including in brain and spinal cord. In more recent experiments that were also
conducted using ABCD1 mouse, evidence of improved neural histology and neuro-behavior were
observed with both PXL065 and PXL770.
Based on all the preclinical and clinical data that the Company has for both platform leads, it plans to
initiate two parallel and identical Phase 2a biomarker-driven POC studies, one with PXL065 and one
with PXL770. The study design was developed with substantial input from several disease experts in
the US and Europe. Each trial will enroll approximately 12 adult male patients per dose with the most
common subtype of ALD, AMN. Following a run-in period, patients will be treated for 12 weeks with
a single oral daily dose of either molecule. Readouts will include PK, safety and measurements at
several time points, of key disease biomarkers, VLCFA and neurofilament light chain, both of which
are validated as disease-associated. Additional exploratory biomarkers will also be assessed.
These trials are expected to begin midyear 2022, followed by data in early 2023. Following analysis of
these results, the Company expects to select the preferred molecule for further advancement into a
pivotal trial(s).
In February and April 2022, the FDA granted Fast Track Designation (FTD) to PXL065 and PXL770,
respectively, for the treatment of ALD. FTD is designed to expedite development of pharmaceutical
products which demonstrate the potential to address unmet medical needs in serious or life-
threatening conditions. FTD provides Poxel with substantially enhanced access to FDA, including
opportunities for face-to-face meetings and written consultations throughout the remaining
development of PXL065. Drugs with FTD are eligible to apply for Accelerated Approval and Priority
Review at the time of a New Drug Application (NDA) submission, which may result in faster product
approval. FTD also allows for 'rolling review', whereby Poxel may submit completed sections of the
NDA as they become available, rather than at the end of development.
The potential of PXL065 and PXL770 in ALD have been evaluated in cellular models and in vivo using
ABCD1 null mice, the most relevant animal model which mimics human disease. In cells derived from
both C-ALD and AMN patients, both molecules significantly reduced C26:0 content (both in fibroblasts
and lymphocytes). In parallel, an increase in compensatory ABCD2 expression was evident with both
molecules. Literature reports show that ABCD2 overexpression corrects disease mediated by ABCD1
deficiency in mice. Additionally, in patient-derived cells, mitochondrial function improvements were
noted. Both PXL065 and PXL770 also reduced the expression of proinflammatory genes in patient-
derived lymphocytes and glial cells derived from ABCD1 null mice. Effects on VLCFA in vitro also
translated in vivo where significant reductions were observed in plasma, brain and spinal cord with
both molecules. The figure below illustrates example effects on VLCFA in cells (Left panel with PXL770)
and in spinal cord of diseased mice (Right panel with PXL065).
Page 52
Source: Poxel.
Additional parameters that are potentially predictive of efficacy in patients with ALD (including AMN)
were examined in ABCD1 null mice. This included positive effects on neural histology of the sciatic
nerve and improved neurologic functional tests that were observed in separate cohorts of mice with
each of the two molecules. Figures noted below show examples of these results including: improved
axonal cell shape with PXL065 and improved balance beam test performance with PXL770.
Source: Poxel.
Page 53
Source: Poxel.
It is of potential relevance to compare the Company’s preclinical results in ALD models with those
disclosed by three other companies that are developing small molecule oral agents for the treatment
of patients with ALD who have the AMN phenotype. Although no head-to-head data are presented,
the comparison suggests that both PXL065 and PXL770 are differentiated with respect to mechanism
and have the potential for improved efficacy and/or lower side effect burden.
Overall, there is a clear paucity of development candidates targeting ALD, indicating that there is a
low likelihood of other therapies which would be employed to effectively treat this disease in the
Page 54
coming several years. Therefore, there is a compelling need for new therapeutic approaches; in
particular, for those with disease modifying potential such as PXL065 or PXL770.
2.1.6 Imeglimin – the first type 2 diabetes treatment targeting both major disease-causing defects
Type 2 Diabetes Overview
Diabetes is a disease characterized by abnormally high levels of blood glucose and inadequate levels
of insulin. There are two primary types of diabetes: type 1 and type 2. In type 1 diabetes, autoimmune
processes result in destruction of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreas resulting in total or
nearly total insulin deficiency. In type 2 diabetes, although the pancreas still produces some insulin, it
fails to do so at sufficient levels; in addition, the body fails to normally respond to the insulin that is
produced, a condition known as insulin resistance. According to the IDF, type 2 diabetes is the more
prevalent form of the disease, affecting approximately 90% of all people diagnosed with diabetes.
In healthy individuals, the pancreas releases a natural spike of insulin at the start of a meal, which
serves both to dispose of the glucose derived from food and to switch off the production of
endogenous glucose by the liver. By contrast, in patients with type 2 diabetes, the amount of insulin
produced is typically low and the response to insulin by both the liver (to signal cessation of glucose
production) and other tissues (to promote glucose uptake and disposition) is defective. When
combined, these defects in insulin secretion and insulin action (referred to as insulin resistance) lead
to hyperglycemia. The amount of hemoglobin altered by glucose, hemoglobin A1c or HbA1c, is directly
proportional to the level of elevated glucose.
High levels of blood glucose, in turn, lead to other defects in the structure and function of selected
cell types – including the integrity of the small blood vessels. Over time, these consequences of
hyperglycemia result in the adverse and sometimes fatal onset of: retinopathy leading to blindness;
loss of kidney function; nerve damage and loss of sensation; poor circulation in the periphery,
potentially requiring amputation of the limbs; and macrovascular complications in the heart and the
brain. According to the American Diabetes Association, 66% of deaths among diabetes patients are
due to cardiovascular events.
Page 55
The diagram below sets forth the development and progression of type 2 diabetes:
NGT – normal glucose tolerance; IGT – impaired glucose tolerance; T2DM – Type 2 diabetes.
Source: Saisho Y. European Med J 2018; 6:46-52. Poxel.
Page 56
(A) Insulin-resistance: resistance to insulin commonly develops in certain subjects when chronic over-
nutrition, and/or a reduction in physical activity gradually leads to obesity with the accumulation of
fat in the abdomen and in selected organs. The burden of lipid excess produces deficient activation of
cellular signals in response to insulin. With reduced insulin action, the hormone is no longer able to
fully mediate its effects to curtail liver glucose production or to drive glucose uptake and metabolism
in other tissues.
(B) Hyper-insulinism: at earlier stages in the evolution of type 2 diabetes, typically in pre-diabetes
(with impaired glucose tolerance), the absolute amount of insulin produced by the pancreas may be
higher than normal, in an attempt to overcome insulin resistance. However, even with higher insulin
levels, or hyper-insulinism, glucose homeostasis is typically abnormal; thus, the amount of insulin
produced is insufficient relative to the body’s needs.
(C) Relative insulinopenia (or shortage of insulin): frequently, prediabetes evolves towards diabetes
with frank hyperglycemia. This occurs as a consequence of further pancreatic beta cell dysfunction
and a decline in insulin secretion to overtly low levels. When the pancreas is no longer able to secrete
quantities of insulin needed to regulate glycemia pharmacological intervention is usually initiated.
Type 2 Diabetes Current Therapies and their Limitations
Treatments for type 2 diabetes are intended to re-establish glucose homeostasis. Initially, patients
may be placed on an exercise regime and diabetes-friendly diet that limits the intake of simple
carbohydrates and high-fat foods, which are associated with increased blood glucose and lipid levels.
However, exercise and dietary changes are alone generally insufficient to control patients' glycemic
levels, and type 2 diabetes patients are often then prescribed oral agents. These include (i) metformin
which limits glucose production in the liver, (ii) oral alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, which reduce GI
carbohydrate absorption; (iii) dipeptidylpeptidase IV inhibitors (DPP-4), (iv) sodium-glucose
cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors. GLP1 analogs, generally injectable forms of the hormone GLP1, can
also be used later in the treatment continuum. Patients unable to maintain glucose homeostasis on
these therapies may be prescribed injectable insulin. As described in the table below, there are
significant limitations with each of these classes.
Page 57
Attributes and Limitations of Key Non-insulin Current Therapies.
Class
Biguanides
Key Drug(s)
metformin
Key Attributes
First-line therapy Lactic acidosis
Key Toxicities/ Limitations
G7 Drug Sales (2017)(1)
$1.7bn
Limits glucose
production
Some
GI disorders
Many contraindications;
chronic renal insufficiency;
acidosis, hypoxia,
cardiovascular
benefit
dehydration, etc
Low impact on disease
progression
56% of treated patients
become refractory in less
than three years
DPP-4 inhibitors Sitagliptin
Saxagliptin
Increases insulin GI upset
$14.3bn, including:
Januvia: $6.6bn
Janumet: $3.0bn
Tradjenta: $1.6bn
Onglyza: $0.9bn
secretion
Some
Urinary and respiratory
infections
Low impact on disease
course
Linagliptin
cardiovascular
benefit
SGLT-2 inhibitors Empagliflozin Increases glucose Urinary tract infections
$7.2bn, including:
Invokana: $2.8bn
Farxiga: $1.3bn
Canagliflozin
excretion
Increased risk of diabetic
ketoacidosis
dapagliflozin Cardiovascular
protective action
GLP-1 receptor
agonists
Liraglutide
Vildagliptin
Exenatide
Increases glucose GI upset
$7.2bn, including:
Victoza: $4.0bn
Bydureon: $0.4bn
Trulicity: $3-4B
Ozempic: $3-4B
addiction and
Acute pancreatitis
insulin secretion Potential increased risk of
Slows down
weight gain
thyroid cancer
Cardiovascular
protective action
Sulfonylureas
glyburide
glimepiride
lipizide
Increased insulin Increased risk of
sulfonylureas: $0.5bn
secretion
hypoglycemia
Weight gain
Contraindicated for patients
with liver and kidney
disorders
Thiazolidinediones pioglitazone
rosiglitazone
Improves glucose Weight gain, fluid retention
thiazolidinediones: $0.5bn
uptake and
transformation
by muscles and
fat tissues
Liver toxicity
Low impact on
disease course
(1)
Decision Resources, September 2019.
Page 58
While current treatments are often initially effective in helping patients maintain glucose homeostasis,
they present a variety of safety issues. For example, metformin can cause lactic acidosis, a dangerous
buildup of acid in the blood, in patients with liver and kidney disorders and is, therefore, not a viable
option for such patients. By contrast, oral sulfonylureas increase the risk of hypoglycemia and weight
gain. Oral thiazolidinediones (“TZDs”), have been associated with weight gain and fluid retention,
which can aggravate congestive heart failure. Further, many commonly prescribed treatments,
including metformin, alpha-glucosidase inhibitors, oral DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists and
SGLT2 inhibitors, are also associated with nausea, vomiting, gas, diarrhea, urinary tract disorders,
dizziness, and weakness. Moreover, many current treatments are limited in their ability to sufficiently
delay disease progression or prevent complications of type 2 diabetes. For example, according to
Decision Resources, approximately 56% of patients become refractory to metformin within three
years, representing approximately 20 million patients in the G7 countries. Finally, certain newer type
2 diabetes therapies are delivered in injectable form, which is associated with poorer patient
compliance and increased cost.
Type 2 diabetes is also the leading cause of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Treatment of type 2 diabetes
in patients with CKD is more complicated and options are restricted. Approximately 2.4 million adults
in the United States have type 2 diabetes and CKD stages 3b/4, according to the Centers for Disease
Control Prevention, and these patients have an increased cardiovascular risk and challenging glucose
management requirements. In CKD stages 3b/4, current medications are either not advised or require
dose adjustments in more advanced renal impairment. These limitations include: 1) safety risks with
increasing severity of renal impairment; 2) loss of efficacy (glycemic control) with worsening CKD; and
3) the need for dose adjustment with increasing severity of renal impairment. Insulin and insulin
secretagogues are the most commonly used therapies but are often used at suboptimal doses to
reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. Imeglimin's mechanism of action, supported by non-clinical data and
clinical findings, offers the potential for glycemic control in patients with CKD stages 3b/4 as well as
the use of Imeglimin as an add-on to various antidiabetic agents for additional glycemic efficacy. In
addition to the efficacy data, Imeglimin has been observed to have a tolerability profile similar to the
placebo in the subgroup of patients with impaired renal function.
The following chart sets forth certain limitations of existing therapies to treat type 2 diabetes and CKD.
Information derived from package inserts and published literature.
Accordingly, the Company believes that there is a need for a differentiated treatment that can provide
an efficacy and safety profile with minimal hypoglycemia risk.
59
Poxel’s Market Opportunity: Type 2 Diabetes
According to the International Diabetes Foundation, in 2021 an estimated 537 million people between
the ages of 20 and 79 are living with diabetes globally (1 in 10), with more than 90% of those affected
having type 2 diabetes. This estimate is predicted to rise to 643 million by 2030 and 783 million by
2045. Diabetes caused at least USD 966 billion in total healthcare expenditures in 2021, a 316%
increase over the last 15 years. Globally, 541 million adults have Impaired Glucose Tolerance, which
places them at high risk of type 2 diabetes.
Decision Resources, an independent market analysis firm, estimates that diabetes treatments
generated sales of over $61.3 billion in 2017 in the United States, Japan, Germany, Italy, the United
Kingdom, France and Spain, which the Company refers to as the G7 countries, and that sales in these
markets are projected to grow to $75.5 billion by 2027. According to Decision Resources, the diabetes
monotherapy treatment market in the G7 countries was approximately $1.7 billion in 2017 (with the
current standard of care, metformin, used for the treatment of approximately 60% of type 2 diabetes
patients in the G7 countries), while the market for new oral combination therapies was approximately
$21.5 billion in 2017 (with sitagliptin accounting for a 46% market share within its class).
The Company believes that there is significant market potential for non-insulin therapies that preserve
pancreatic function, reduce insulin resistance and decrease CV and metabolic disease risk factors.
Japan
According to Decision Resources, Japan is the second largest diabetes market worldwide, behind the
United States, with a compounded annual growth rate of more than 18% between 2008 and 2012 and
could grow by more than 20% by 2023. According to Decision Resources, estimated sales in Japan are
expected to grow to $4.2 billion by 2020.
There are an increasing number of patients seeking treatment for diabetes in Japan, both type 1 and
type 2, Japan is among the top five countries in Asia for prevalence of diabetes; the latest estimate is
11 million patients27. The Company believes that this market trend is likely to continue, in particular,
given that the Japanese government has identified diabetes as a target disease in its ten-year plan for
National Health Promotion.
China
The Company also believes that China represents a growing commercial opportunity for Imeglimin, if
approved. The Company commissioned a study with IQVIA to analyze the type 2 diabetes patient
population in China, providing the data discussed below. There were approximately 112 million adults
diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in China in 2017 and prevalence is expected to grow by approximately
1.7% per year. In 2017, sales of type 2 diabetes therapies were approximately $3 billion, with oral drug
sales representing approximately 50% of that total. This represents a significant market opportunity.
The Company believes that Imeglimin can target the estimated 29 million patient population in China
being treated with Western drugs, as well as the sizeable patient population with chronic kidney
disease. In line with China's national plan for non-communicable disease prevention and treatment,
the Company also expects more type 2 diabetes patients to have access to diabetic medications. The
Company believes that Imeglimin is well placed to succeed in the Chinese market, if approved there,
by leveraging its dual action and tolerability profile to fill the treatment gap, primarily comprised of
glycemic control and safety. For China and other East and Southeast Asian countries with which its
partner, Sumitomo Pharma, has rights, Sumitomo Pharma has initiated discussion with some
regulatory authorities related to Imeglimin development in these countries and the ability to leverage
data generated in Japan and other countries.
27 International Diabetes Federation 2021
60
Imeglimin for the type 2 diabetes treatment
The Company believes that Imeglimin has the potential to be a first-in-class oral drug candidate that
targets the two main metabolic defects at the root of type 2 diabetes — low insulin secretion and
elevated insulin resistance — by counteracting mitochondrial dysfunction.
Imeglimin was initially developed by Merck Serono and has been further developed by the Company
since it acquired it in 2009. Merck Serono filed an Investigational New Drug application (“IND”), for
Imeglimin with the FDA in 2006; the IND was transferred to the Company in 2009. The Company
believes that Imeglimin is the most clinically advanced type 2 diabetes drug candidate of its class.
Summary of Imeglimin's Mechanism of Action
The Company believes that Imeglimin is able to regulate cellular energy metabolism by counteracting
mitochondrial dysfunction associated with diabetes pathology and its related microvascular and
macrovascular complications. The mitochondrion is the power center of the cell, generating energy
through the production of adenosine triphosphate (“ATP”). In the pathophysiology of diabetes, excess
food intake and a sedentary lifestyle lead to an imbalance in energy storage vs. consumption. This
disequilibrium also causes an increase in the production of reactive oxygen species (“ROS”), by the
mitochondrial respiratory chain, which impairs its function, leading to insufficient insulin secretion in
response to glucose and to impaired insulin sensitivity.
The Company believes that Imeglimin improves mitochondrial function by modulating mitochondrial
respiratory chain activities, decreasing reactive oxygen species (ROS) overproduction, and affecting
other aspects of cellular energy metabolism. Several observed effects support this concept:
Imeglimin partially and reversibly inhibits mitochondrial Complex I in a competitive fashion. In
contrast, metformin more potently inhibits Complex I through a non-competitive mechanism that
could lead to excess lactic acid levels, an effect which is not observed with Imeglimin.
Imeglimin augments the activity of Complex III of the mitochondrion and modulates opening of
the mitochondrial permeability transition pore, mPTP. These effects are believed to contribute to
lower ROS production.
Additionally, Imeglimin has been observed to increase cellular levels of NAD+, a key co-factor
required for energy production by mitochondria.
Through the above effects on cellular energy metabolism and mitochondrial function, Imeglimin has
been observed to drive dual mechanisms that are believed to lead to correction of hyperglycemia:
A. Improved insulin secretion in response to glucose
increased glucose-stimulated insulin secretion in isolated pancreatic islets and in vivo
preservation of functional beta cells in animals with diabetes.
B. Reduced insulin resistance
increased glucose utilization in response to insulin infusion
augmentation of physiologic processes which are known effects of insulin – inhibition of liver
glucose production and muscle glucose uptake.
The Company believes that Imeglimin’s beneficial effect to preserve pancreatic beta cell mass could
lead to delaying disease progression. Imeglimin has also been observed to improve vascular
endothelial dysfunction; this leads the Company to believe that Imeglimin may have a vascular
protective effect that could potentially delay the occurrence or decrease the progression of vascular
complications in the type 2 diabetes population.
The diagram below sets forth a representation of Imeglimin’s mechanism of action on mitochondrial
function and other aspects of cell metabolism that leads to dual benefits with respect to insulin
secretion and insulin action:
61
Source: reactive oxygen species; #mitochondrial permeability transition pore;
Adapted from: Hallakou-Bozec et al, Mechanism of action of imeglimin – a novel therapeutic agent for type 2
diabetes; Diabetes Obes Metab 2021, doi.org/10.1111/dom.14277
Summary of Clinical Trials
To date, Imeglimin has been evaluated in 28 clinical trials and has successfully completed its three
Phase 3 clinical trials in Japan. Imeglimin has been administered to an aggregate of 400 non-diabetic
patients and over 1,800 type 2 diabetes patients at dosages ranging from 100 mg to 8,000 mg per day.
The Company has successfully completed the Phase 2 clinical program for Imeglimin in the United
States, Europe and Japan. Together, with its partner Sumitomo Pharma, the Company has concluded
in 2019 the Phase 3 clinical program known as TIMES for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan.
The tables below set forth summary information regarding 28 clinical trials for Imeglimin.
62
Phase 1 Clinical Trials
TOTAL
NUMBER OF
NUMBER OF PATIENTS ON
PATIENTS
TREATMENT
DURATION
STUDY NO.
IMEGLIMIN
PRIMARY END POINT
DOSE
P-VALUE (1) REGION
Up to 4,000
mg
EML017008-001
73
6
73
6
Up to 9 Days Safety / Pharmacokinetics
Europe
Europe
Europe
EML017008-
002
Single dose Safety / Pharmacokinetics 1,000 mg
EML017008-
005
1,000 mg QD
/ 500 mg
51
51
8 Days
Safety / Pharmacokinetics
PXL008-001
PXL008-003
15
16
15
16
6 Days
6 Days
Safety / Pharmacokinetics 1,500 mg
Safety / Pharmacokinetics 1,500 mg
750 mg /
Europe
Europe
PXL008-007
PXL008-010
14
14
12
14
Single dose Safety / Pharmacokinetics
Europe
Europe
1,500 mg
750 mg /
1,500 mg
Single dose Safety / Pharmacokinetics
500 mg /
1,000 mg /
1,500 mg /
Safety / Pharmacokinetics 2,000 mg RD
Single dose or
10 Days
PXL008-011
64
48
Europe
4,000 mg /
6,000 mg /
8,000 mg SD
Up to 8,000
mg
PXL008-012
PXL008-016
9
9
Up to 7 Days Safety / Pharmacokinetics
Single dose Cardiovascular safety
Europe
Europe
55
2,250 mg /
6000 mg
54
PXL008-022
PXL008-023
PXL008-024
DD401101
16
16
14
12
16
16
14
12
Single dose Safety / Pharmacokinetics 1,000 mg
Single dose Safety / Pharmacokinetics 1,500 mg
Single dose Safety / Pharmacokinetics 1,000 mg
Single dose Safety / Pharmacokinetics 1,000 mg
Europe
Europe
Europe
Japan
500 mg or
Single dose Safety / Pharmacokinetics
1,000 mg
DD401102
24
24
Japan
63
Phase 2 Clinical Trials
TOTAL
NUMBER OF
NUMBER OF PATIENTS ON
TREATMENT
STUDY NO.
PATIENTS
IMEGLIMIN
DURATION PRIMARY END POINT
DOSE
P-VALUE (1)
REGION
Change in AUC
Glucose versus
Placebo
EML017008-
004
500 mg /
1,500 mg
p =0.086 / p
=0.003
128
62
8 Weeks
Europe
Change in A1c versus
Placebo
PXL008-002
PXL008-004
PXL008-006
156
170
33
78
82
18
12 Weeks
12 Weeks
7 Days
1,500 mg
1,500 mg
p <0.001
p <0.001
p =0.035
Europe
Europe
Europe
Change in A1c versus
Placebo
Change in AUC Insulin
versus Placebo
1,500 mg
500 mg /
n.s. / n.s. / p
<0.001 /
p =0.006
Change in A1c versus 1,000 mg /
Placebo
U.S. &
Europe
PXL008-008
382
301
24 Weeks
1,500 mg /
2,000 mg
Change in AUC
Glucose versus
Placebo
PXL008-009
PXL008-014
59
30
18 Weeks
24 Weeks
1,500 mg
500 mg /
1,000 mg / <0.0001 / p
1,500 mg
p =0.001
Europe
Japan
p <0.0001 / p
Change in A1c versus
Placebo
299
224
<0.0001
500 mg (bid)
/ 1,000 mg
(bid) / 1,500
mg (qd)
RVT-1501-1002
(3)
49
34
4 weeks
PK/PD
U.S.
Phase 3 Clinical Trials
TOTAL
NUMBER OF
NUMBER OF PATIENTS ON
TREATMENT
DURATION PRIMARY END POINT
STUDY NO.
PATIENTS
IMEGLIMIN
DOSE
P-VALUE (2)
REGION
Change in HbA1c &
TIMES 1
213
714
106
714
24 weeks
safety
1,000 mg
1,000 mg
p<0.0001
Japan
Japan
Long Term safety &
52 weeks
TIMES 2 (2)
Change in HbA1c
16 weeks (1st
Long Term safety &
part) + 36
<0.0001 (1st
part)
TIMES 3 (2)
215
108
1,000 mg
Japan
Change in HbA1c
weeks (2nd part)
(1)
(2)
There were no p-values for the Phase 1 clinical trials as there were no efficacy endpoints.
There were no p-values for TIMES 2 and TIMES 3 (second part) trials as the primary objective of these trials
is long term safety.
(3)
Trial conducted by Roivant.
64
Clinical Development Plan in Japan
Together, with its partner Sumitomo Pharma, the Company has completed the Phase 3 TIMES program
for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan and submitted a JNDA to the Pharmaceutical and Medical
Devices Agency (“PMDA”) in July 2020. Approval was received in June 2021 and the commercialization
of TWYMEEG® (Imeglimin hydrochloride) for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan started in
September 2021.
TIMES Program
The TIMES program consists of the following three trials conducted in Japan, each performed with the
dose of 1,000 mg orally administered twice a day, or bid:
TIMES 1, a Phase 3, 24-week, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled monotherapy trial to
evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerance of Imeglimin. Topline results from the TIMES 1 trial were
announced in April 2019 and results were published in 2020.28
TIMES 2, a Phase 3, 52-week, open and parallel-group trial to evaluate the long-term efficacy, safety
and tolerance of Imeglimin in Japanese patients suffering from type 2 diabetes. In this trial,
Imeglimin is administered in monotherapy or in combination with existing diabetes drugs. Topline
results from the TIMES 2 trial were announced in December 2019 and results were published in
2021.29
TIMES 3, a Phase 3, 16-week, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial with a 36-week,
open-label extension period to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Imeglimin in combination with
insulin. Topline results were announced in 2019 and results were published in 2021.30
TIMES 1
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled monotherapy trial, 1,000 mg of Imeglimin was
orally administered twice-daily versus placebo for 24 weeks in 213 Japanese patients, of whom 106
received Imeglimin.
The diagram below sets forth the TIMES 1 trial design.
The TIMES 1 trial met its primary endpoint, defined as a change of glycated HbA1c versus placebo at
week 24, with a statistically significant (p<0.0001) HbA1c placebo-corrected mean change from
baseline of – 0.87%, as shown in the diagram below.
28 Dubourg J. Diabetes Care. 2021 44:952-959.
29 Dubourg J. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2021. doi: 10.1111/dom.14613
30 Reilhac C. Diabetes Obes Metab 2022. doi.org/10.1111/dom.14642
65
In this trial, the overall tolerability of Imeglimin was observed to be similar to placebo.
TIMES 2
TIMES 2 evaluated the long-term safety and efficacy of Imeglimin in 714 Japanese patients with type 2
diabetes. In this trial, 1,000 mg of Imeglimin was orally administered twice daily in combination with
existing hypoglycemic agents and as a monotherapy.
The diagram below sets forth the TIMES 2 trial design.
The TIMES 2 trial, which was open label and not placebo-controlled, was observed to show an HbA1c
decrease from baseline ranging from -0.92% to -0.57 with Imeglimin as an add on to six existing oral
hypoglycemic classes (GLP1 receptor agonists studied are injectable). A favorable safety and
tolerability profile was also evident in this study. Efficacy results are shown in the diagram below.
66
In particular Imeglimin was observed to show an HbA1c decrease from baseline of -0.92% versus
baseline as an add on to a DPP-4 inhibitor, the market leader in Japan and prescribed to approximately
80% of treated type 2 diabetes patients in 2016, according to IQVIA.
TIMES 3
This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized part of the trial evaluated efficacy and safety of
Imeglimin versus placebo in 215 patients, of whom 108 received Imeglimin. In this trial, Imeglimin at a
dosage of 1,000 mg was orally administered twice-daily in combination with insulin in Japanese
patients with type 2 diabetes associated with insufficient glycemic control on insulin therapy an
compared to patients administered placebo and insulin. The first 16-week portion of the TIMES 3 trial
met its primary endpoint, defined as a change of glycated HbA1c from baseline versus placebo at week
16, with a statistically significant (p<0.0001) mean HbA1c placebo-corrected change from baseline of
– 0.60%, as shown in the diagram below.
In a 36-week, open-label extension period of the TIMES 3 trial, 208 patients who completed the first
16 weeks of the study were treated with Imeglimin as well as insulin therapy. The open-label extension
period showed a mean HbA1c decrease from baseline of 0.64% in patients receiving Imeglimin for 52
weeks (Imeglimin and insulin for 16 weeks following by Imeglimin and insulin for 36 weeks) and 0.54%
in patients receiving Imeglimin and insulin for the last 36 weeks only (placebo and insulin for 16 weeks
followed by Imeglimin and insulin for 36 weeks).
67
Clinical Development in Type 2 Diabetes Patients with Kidney Disease
In 2018, the Company initiated a strategic development and license agreement with Roivant for
Imeglimin in the United States, Europe and in other countries not covered by its existing partnership
with Sumitomo Pharma in Southeast Asia. Together with its partner Roivant, in 2019 the Company
announced topline results from a 28 day clinical trial which evaluated safety, tolerability and PK/PD of
Imeglimin in individuals with type 2 diabetes and CKD stages 3b/4. Imeglimin was observed to meet
the primary objective of being well-tolerated in this specific patient population, confirming the safety
profile that had been previously observed and demonstrating its potential in this patient population.
In addition, effects on glycemia and PK results defined an appropriate dose range that could be further
pursued in this population. The completion of this trial was one of the key activities used to prepare
for a potential Phase 3 program in the United States and Europe. As of January 31, 2021 and following
to the decision by Roivant not to advance Imeglimin into a Phase 3 program for strategic reasons, the
Company regained all rights to Imeglimin in territories not covered by the partnership agreement with
Sumitomo Pharma. As part of the termination of the agreement, Roivant also returned to the Company
all data, materials, and information, including FDA regulatory submission, related to the program.
The Company does not intend to advance Imeglimin into a Phase 3 program in type 2 diabetes alone
in the US, Europe and other countries not covered by the agreement with Sumitomo Pharma. The
Company conducted and completed a comprehensive evaluation of partnering options in 2021 and
does not expect to enter into a broad strategic partnership for the US and Europe in the near term.
The Company is now considering opportunities to leverage the Imeglimin data package in specific
territories, including those resulting from inbound interest.
Completed Phase 2 Trials
PXL008-014 (Japan)
The Company completed a 24-week Phase 2b randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in
June 2017 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japanese patients. The results of this trial are
summarized in the figure below and were published in 2021.31
7.85 %
N =73
7.94 %
N =75
7.91 %
N =73
**
**
p < 0.0001
**
**
In particular, in this trial, the tolerability of Imeglimin in patients with mild or moderate CKD was also
observed to be similar in patients whose renal function is normal.
Phase 2 Studies Conducted in U.S. and Europe
The Company also previously completed a placebo-controlled 24-week Phase 2b dose-ranging trial
(PXL008-008) that was conducted across multiple sites in the United States and Europe. A separate
Phase 2 dose-ranging trial (PXL008-009) was also previously completed to assess characteristics of
Imeglimin on various efficacy parameters, including fasting and post-prandial glycemia (the level of
blood glucose after eating), and the contribution of those two effects on the decline in A1c levels.
31 Dubourg J. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23:800-810.
68
Mathematical modeling of the glucose, insulin or C-Peptide curves obtained in the PXL008-009 study
showed that Imeglimin significantly improved several surrogate markers of insulin sensitivity, including
the Matsuda index or the Stumvoll index, that have been correlated with the result obtained using the
reference method of the hyperinsulinemic clamp; in addition, mathematical modeling of C-Peptide
secretion increased in response to glucose revealed results that are consistent with an improvement
in insulin secretion. The results from this trial therefore support the dual mechanism of action of
Imeglimin in type 2 diabetes patients, improving both glucose dependent insulin secretion (by
improving the beta cell glucose sensitivity) and insulin sensitivity. These two trials showed a similar
efficacy and safety-tolerability profile (in a mostly Caucasian population) as was subsequently
observed in Japan.
The Company has also previously completed Phase 2 efficacy and safety studies of Imeglimin in
combination with metformin and with a DPP-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin (PXL008-002 and PXL008-004).32
PXL008-002 assessed the benefit of combining metformin with Imeglimin, as compared to placebo in
combination with metformin after 12 weeks of treatment. PXL008-004 assessed the benefit of
combining Imeglimin with sitagliptin, as compared to sitagliptin in combination with a placebo after
12 weeks of treatment. In both of these trials, additive efficacy and acceptable safety-tolerability were
observed when combining Imeglimin with these agents.
An additional Phase 2 efficacy trial (PXL008-006) specifically examined Imeglimin's effect on
pancreatic beta cell function in diabetes patients.33 The primary endpoint of the trial was insulin
secretion as defined by total insulin response and insulin secretion rate in the context of a
hyperglycemic clamp. The Company observed that Imeglimin raised insulin secretory response to
glucose including both first- and second-phase insulin secretion.
Completed Phase 1 Trials
The Company has conducted 15 Phase 1 trials of Imeglimin with an aggregate of 330 subjects. The
Phase 1 trials assessed safety, tolerability and PK of Imeglimin in doses ranging from 100 mg to 8,000
mg per day. In these trials, it was observed that Imeglimin has a low risk of drug interactions both alone
and in combination with metformin, cimetidine and sitagliptin. In addition, there was now significant
risk of QT prolongation.
Manufacturing and Supply
Imeglimin is manufactured using a three-step process. Merck Serono originally developed and
optimized the synthesis process for the manufacture of Imeglimin and the process was further
optimized at industrial scale. A group of specialized subcontractors and Sumitomo Pharma currently
manage molecule synthesis, tablet manufacturing and control in accordance with good manufacturing
practices (“GMP”). The Company believes the manufacturing process for immediate-release tablets is
of sufficient size and robustness to support market launch.
Imeglimin is formulated as a coated, oval-shaped tablet with immediate release. The Company has
developed three different dosage strengths: 250 mg, 500 mg and 750 mg. Imeglimin is a stable active
substance and, if kept below 25° C, has a shelf life of up to 60 months (depending on packaging used).
Imeglimin's long shelf life has been observed during long-term stability studies in accordance with ICH
recommendations.
Preclinical Activities
The Company is pursuing preclinical activities for AMPK activation and with deuterium-modified
thiazolidinediones which have MPC and or ACSL4 inhibition for additional metabolic, specialty and rare
diseases.
32 Fouqueray P Diabetes Care 2014;37:1924-30. Fouqueray P. Diabetes Care 2013;36:565
33 Pacini G. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015;17:541-545.
69
2.1.7 Intellectual Property
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document the Company owns or co-owns 35 families of
patents and patent applications covering AMPK activators, and deuterated TZDs, as well as its other
diabetes programs. The Company also holds an exclusive, worldwide license for five families of patents
and patent applications owned by Merck Serono covering its AMPK activator main programs, as well
as an exclusive, worldwide license for 16 families of patents and patent applications owned by Merck
Serono covering its other diabetes treatment programs. The exclusive, worldwide license for the
patents and patent applications owned by Merck Serono is granted to the Company for the duration
of the patents, subject to performance of the Company’s obligations under the MS Agreement.
In 2021, the Company conducted a strategic review of its patent portfolio and decided to abandon
certain patent families which were not relevant for its activities.
The Company’s patent portfolio as of the date of this Universal Registration Document can be
summarized and separated into the following four groups:
Imeglimin;
AMPK activators;
Deuterated TZDs; and
other diabetes programs, including GLP-1 agonists, FxR agonists, glucokinase activators
and 11-betahydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibitors, which are still in the research
phase.
The patents and patent applications in these four groups include those covering drug products,
manufacturing procedures, combination therapies and new therapeutic applications.
Imeglimin
The intellectual property portfolio for Imeglimin contains 14 families of patents and patent applications
directed to various aspects of that compound, manufacturing procedures, combination therapies and
methods of use for treating diabetes and other indications. As of the date of this Universal Registration
Document, all the 14 families of the patents and patent applications directed to this program and
owned or co-owned by the Company are either in force or pending in a number of strategic
jurisdictions, such as Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Europe, India, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South
Korea, Mexico, Russia, Singapore, Taiwan, Thailand, the United States and South Africa. The patents
and patent applications have statutory expiration dates between 2024 and 2039. Patents assigned to
the Company by Merck Serono have statutory expiration dates as late as 2029. Patent term
adjustments or patent term extensions could result in later expiration dates. The patent estate for
Imeglimin extends to 2036 (including potential 5-year patent term extension), with other patent
applications ongoing. Patent term extension application have been filed for 5 patent families in Japan
in 2021 in connection with the approval of Imeglimin in this territory in June 2021.
70
AMPK Activators
The intellectual property portfolio for the Company’s AMPK activators program contains 14 families of
patents and patent applications directed to compositions of matter for PXL770 and analogs,
compositions of matter for AMPK activators having different structural features (i.e., different
compound classes), as well as combination therapies and methods of use for these compounds. As of
the date of this Universal Registration Document, the Company owns 9 families of patents and patent
applications directed to this program. 8 families of the owned patents and patent applications are
directed to PXL770, comprising a number of jurisdictions, such as Australia, Brazil, Canada, China,
Russia, Europe, Israel, India, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, South Africa and the United States. The
families directed to PXL770 or analogs thereof, including the PXL770 composition of matter patent,
have statutory expiration dates ranging from 2033 to 2041. The other family that the Company owns
has statutory expiration dates in 2031.
Deuterated Thiazolidinediones
The intellectual property profile for the Company’s deuterated thiazolidinedione program contains 7
families of patents and patent applications directed to compositions of matter for PXL065,
compositions of matter for deuterated TZDs having different structural features (i.e., different
compound classes), as well as methods of use for these novel compounds. All 7 of the families of
patents and patent applications in this program are owned by the Company as of the date of this
Universal Registration Document. 5 families of the owned patents and patent applications are directed
to PXL065. The earliest filed family directed to PXL065 includes the granted PXL065 composition of
matter patent with an expiration date in 2031, and also includes other patents and pending
applications which have expected expiration dates in 2028, with all patents and applications in the
family granted and active only in the United States. The second filed family directed to PXL065 has
statutory expiration dates in 2035, is granted in the United States and in Europe. The third filed family
directed to PXL065 has statutory expiration dates in 2036 and is pending only in the United States. The
fourth family includes an unpublished PCT and a United States non-provisional application and is
directed to forms related to PXL065, which could eventually lead to worldwide patent rights, and
would have projected statutory expiration dates in 2041. The fifth family includes an unpublished
United States non-provisional application only, is directed to processes related to PXL065, and would
have projected statutory expiration dates in 2041. In addition, the Company owns two families of
patents and patent applications directed to deuterated TZDs other than PXL065, one of which has
statutory expiration dates in 2034 and is granted in the United States, Canada, Japan and Europe, and
the remaining family has a statutory expiration date in 2036 and is pending only in the United States.
Patent term adjustments or patent term extensions could result in later expiration dates.
Other Programs
The intellectual property portfolio for the Company’s other programs contains patents and patent
applications directed to compositions of matter for GLP-1 agonists, FxR agonists, glucokinase activators
and 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibitors, manufacturing procedures, and methods of
using them for treating various diseases including diabetes. As of the date of this Universal Registration
Document, the Company co-owns one family directed to the FxR agonists program (co-owned with
INSERM; Universite Claude Bernard; Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon, Centre National de la
Recherche Scientifique; and Edelris), and which has a statutory expiration date in 2034. The Company
also holds an exclusive license to four families of patents and patent applications directed to GLP-1
agonists program, six families directed to glucokinase activators program, and five families directed to
11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase inhibitors program. The licensed patents and patent
applications have statutory expiration dates between 2026 and 2029. Patent term adjustments or
patent term extensions could result in later expiration dates.
The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term for patents in the countries in which they
are obtained. In most countries, including the United States, the patent term is 20 years from the
71
earliest filing date of a non-provisional patent application. In the United States, a patent's term may
be lengthened by patent term adjustment, which compensates a patentee for administrative delays
by the USPTO, in examining and granting a patent, or may be shortened if a patent is terminally
disclaimed over another patent which has an earlier statutory expiration date. The term of a patent
that covers a drug or biological product may also be eligible for patent term extension when FDA
approval is granted, provided statutory and regulatory requirements are met (see Section 2.1.9
"Regulatory Environment” for additional information on such exclusivity). In the future, if and when its
drug candidates receive approval by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities, the Company expects
to apply for patent term extensions on issued patents covering those drugs, depending upon the length
of the clinical trials for each drug and other factors. However, there can be no assurance that any of
the Company’s pending patent applications will issue or that it will benefit from any patent term
extension or favorable adjustment to the term of any of its patents.
As with other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, the Company’s ability to maintain and
solidify its proprietary and intellectual property position for its drug candidates and technologies will
depend on its success in obtaining effective patent claims and enforcing those claims if granted.
However, its pending patent applications, and any patent applications that it may in the future file or
license from third parties may not result in the issuance of patents. For example, publications of
discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications
in the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, or
in some cases not at all. Therefore, the Company cannot know with certainty whether it was the first
to file for patent protection of the inventions claimed in its owned and licensed patents or pending
patent applications. It also cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in its
patents. Any issued patents that the Company may receive in the future may be challenged, invalidated
or circumvented. In addition, because of the extensive time required for clinical development and
regulatory review of a drug candidate the Company may develop, it is possible that, before any of its
drug candidates can be commercialized, any related patent may expire or remain in force for only a
short period following commercialization, thereby limiting protection such patent would afford the
respective product and any competitive advantage such patent may provide.
In addition to patents, the Company relies upon unpatented trade secrets and know-how and
continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain its competitive position. The Company
seeks to protect its proprietary information, in part, by executing confidentiality agreements with its
partners and scientific advisors, and non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality, and invention
assignment agreements with its employees and consultants. The Company has also executed
agreements requiring assignment of inventions with selected scientific advisors and partners. The
confidentiality agreements the Company enters into are designed to protect its proprietary
information and the agreements or clauses requiring assignment of inventions to the Company are
designed to grant it ownership of technologies that are developed through its relationship with the
respective counterparty. The Company cannot guarantee, however, that these agreements will afford
it adequate protection of its intellectual property and proprietary information rights.
Trademarks and Domain Names
The Company owns a number of trademarks and domain names, including its logo and the URL for its
website, as well as a number of websites including the name "Imeglimin" or "Imeglimine". Poxel® is a
registered trademark of the Company in France, the EU and the United States. Poxel® with its semi-
figurative color logo is a registered trademark of the Company in France and the EU.
72
2.1.8 Competition
The Company faces potential competition from various sources, including any pharmaceutical or
biotechnology company, academic institution, governmental agency or public or private research
institution that has drugs on the market or is developing drug candidates for type 2 diabetes. The
biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are highly competitive and subject to significant and
rapid technological change as researchers learn more about diseases and develop new technologies
and treatments. Significant competitive factors in this industry include product efficacy and safety;
quality and breadth of an organization's technology; skill of an organization's employees and its ability
to recruit and retain key employees; timing and scope of regulatory approvals; government
reimbursement rates for, and the average selling price of, products; the availability of raw materials
and qualified manufacturing capacity; manufacturing costs; intellectual property and patent rights and
their protection; and sales and marketing capabilities. Given the intense competition in this industry,
the Company cannot assure that any of the products that it successfully develops will be clinically
superior or scientifically preferable to products developed or introduced by its competitors.
The Company’s competitors in the NASH space include large pharmaceuticals, established and
specialty biotech companies including, but not limited to, Novartis AG, Pfizer Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S,
Gilead Sciences, Inc., Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Viking
Therapeutics, Inc., Inventiva and Akero Therapeutics. The Company’s competitors in the ALD space are
primarily small biotech companies including, but not limited to, Minoryx, Viking Therapeutics,
Autobahn Therapeutics, SwanBio. The Company’s competitors in the type 2 diabetes space are
primarily large pharmaceuticals companies including, but not limited to, AstraZeneca PLC,
GlaxoSmithKline plc, Eli Lilly & Co., Novo Nordisk A/S, Johnson & Johnson, Boehringer, and Merck Sharp
& Dohme Corp.
Such competitors may also succeed in obtaining EMA, FDA, PMDA or other regulatory approvals for
their drug candidates more rapidly than the Company, which could place it at a significant competitive
disadvantage or deny it marketing exclusivity rights. Market acceptance of the Company’s drug
candidates will depend on a number of factors, including:
potential advantages over existing or alternative therapies or tests;
the actual or perceived safety of similar classes of products;
the effectiveness of sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities; and
the scope of any approval provided by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities.
While its competitors are marketing and/or developing new type 2 diabetes therapies the Company
believes that the unique mechanism of action of Imeglimin (i.e., a mitochondrial bioenergetics
enhancer) positions the drug candidate as a potential monotherapy or combination therapy. The
Company also believes that PXL770 is the most clinically advanced drug candidate for treatment of any
human disease with a direct allosteric AMPK activation mechanism of action, an energy sensor that
controls energy metabolism. PXL770 is currently being developed as monotherapy and has the
potential for combination therapy with PXL065 and with other agents. Additionally, the Company
believes that PXL065 (deuterium-stabilized R-isomer of pioglitazone), which functions via non-genomic
pathways including MPC and ACSL4 inhibition, offers a differentiated approach to the treatment of
NASH or ALD with the potential for robust efficacy and a reduction of side effects associated with the
parent drug, pioglitazone. PXL065 is currently being developed as monotherapy and has the potential
for combination therapy with PXL770 and with other agents. In ALD pathophysiology, increases in
VLCFA, specifically saturated C26:0 fatty acid, are the primary driver of disease with downstream
pathologies leading to axonal degeneration for both cerebral and spinal cord disease. Multiple recent
publications support the utility of both AMPK activation and TZD-related pathways for the treatment
of ALD, and the Company has developed evidence to show that both its platforms, AMPK activation
73
and D-TZDs, can be leveraged to address this pathophysiology and to correct the primary defect by
suppressing VLCFA levels and by potentially ameliorating downstream consequences that include
mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation and cell death.
Although the Company believes that its drug candidates possess attractive attributes, it cannot ensure
that its drug candidates will achieve regulatory or market acceptance, or that it will be able to compete
effectively in the biopharmaceutical drug markets. If the Company’s drug candidates fail to gain
regulatory approvals and acceptance in their intended markets, it may not generate meaningful
revenues or achieve profitability.
In addition, many of the Company’s competitors have significantly greater financial resources and
expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical studies, conducting clinical trials,
obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved drugs. Mergers and acquisitions in the
pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated
among a smaller number of the Company’s competitors. Smaller or early-stage companies may also
prove to be significant competitors, particularly through partnership arrangements with large and
established companies. These companies also compete with the Company in recruiting and retaining
qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient
registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for,
the Company’s programs.
There are currently no therapeutic products approved for the treatment of NASH or NAFLD. There are
several marketed therapeutics that are currently used off label for the treatment of NASH, such as
antihyperlipidemic agents (e.g., gemfibrozil), pentoxifylline ursodiol, and pioglitazone, which is the
most extensively studied drug for NASH and has demonstrated resolution of NASH without worsening
of fibrosis in several trials as well as improvements in fibrosis. The Company is aware of several
companies that may have drug candidates that promote AMPK activation, including Energenesis
Biomedical, Betagenon; however, molecules being pursued by these companies are not known to be
direct AMPK activators; other companies may have such candidates in earlier stage programs. Also, it
is possible that one or more of the AMPK activator drug candidates mentioned above that are being
developed by the Company’s competitors could be used for the treatment of NASH. In addition, Cirius
Therapeutics completed a Phase 2b clinical study with a drug candidate targeting MPC, MSDC-0602K.
There are currently no therapeutic products approved for the treatment of ALD. Minoryx Therapeutics
is developing an oral agent which is derived from pioglitazone – leriglitazone – for the potential
treatment of ALD. This program completed a Ph2-3 trial in patients with AMN but failed to meet its
primary endpoint. Leriglitazone is also being studied in an additional trial in pediatric patients with
cerebral ALD.34
74
2.1.9 Regulatory Environment
Pharmaceutical Approval in the European Union
The Company’s ability to market a product within the EEA (which is comprised of the Member States
of the European Union, plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) is contingent upon obtaining a
marketing authorization from the appropriate regulatory authorities. While there is a set of common
rules governing issuance of marketing authorization, the requirements governing pricing and
reimbursement vary widely from country-to-country.
Preclinical studies
Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry, toxicity and formulation, as well
as animal studies to assess potential safety and efficacy. Preclinical studies involving animals shall
follow a set of harmonized rules which aim at reducing the number of studies and animals used for
scientific purposes and encourage the development of alternative methods. Recourse to animal
models shall be used only when no other methods are available for the purposes of the study, and
shall demonstrate strict proportionality in terms of replacement, reduction and refinement of the use
of animals (so-called “3 Rs Principles”).
Clinical trials
Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases, which may overlap or be
combined:
Phase 1: The drug is initially introduced into healthy human patients or patients with the target
disease or condition and tested for safety, dosage tolerability, absorption, metabolism,
distribution, excretion and, if possible, to gain an early indication of its effectiveness.
Phase 2: (begins if phase 1 studies don’t reveal unacceptable toxicity) The drug is administered
to a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to
preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to
determine dosage tolerability and optimal dosage.
Phase 3: (begins if evidence of effectiveness is shown in phase 2) The drug is administered to
an expanded patient population, generally at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites, in
well-controlled clinical trials to generate enough data to statistically evaluate the efficacy and
safety of the product for approval, to establish the overall risk-benefit profile of the product,
and to provide adequate information for the labeling of the product.
-
Applicable provisions
In the European Union, the regulations governing clinical trials are currently based on Directive No.
2001/20/EC of 4 April 2001 on the application of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials
on drugs for human use. Each Member State had to transpose this Directive into national law, finally
adapting it to its own regulatory framework. A clinical trial application, or CTA, must be submitted to
each country’s national health authority and an independent ethics committee. Once the CTA is
approved in accordance with a country’s requirements, clinical trial development may proceed in that
country.
In France, Directive No. 2001/20/EC was initially transposed by Law No. 2004-806 of 9 August 2004 on
public health policy and Decree No. 2006-477 of 26 April 2006 amending Chapter I of Title II of Book I
of Part I of the Public Health Code ("PHC") on biomedical research.
The new European Regulation No. 536/2014 on clinical trials on drugs for human use, repealing
Directive No. 2001/20/EC, aims to enhance patient safety, to increase accessibility to clinical trials, to
raise attractiveness of the European Union and to ensure transparency. While Regulation 536/2014
entered into force on 16 June 2014, the timing of its application depended on the development of a
75
fully functional EU clinical trials portal and database, which has been confirmed by an independent
audit (i.e., six months after the European Commission publishes a notice of this confirmation), and now
the new European Regulation is implemented since January 31, 2022. In France, Ordinance No. 2016-
800 of 16 June 2016 on research involving the human person amended the applicable legal regime, in
particular by adapting French law to Regulation (EU) No. 536/2014. Ordinance No. 2018-1125 of 12
December 2018 updated the provisions on the protection of personal data.
Until 31 January 2023, both the directive 2001/20/EC and the new regulation 536/2014 are applicable,
but after the end of January 2025, any new CTA will be submitted under regulation 536/2014.
-
Opinion of the Committee for the Protection of Persons
Article L. 1121-4 of the PHC establishes a system of prior authorization of any interventional clinical
trial (i.e., involving intervention on the person not justified by his or her usual care) concerning drugs.
The French public agency in charge of authorizing and monitoring the use on the market of drugs,
medical devices and other health products (Agence Nationale de Sécurité des Médicaments et produits
de santé, “ANSM”) and a local Committee for the Protection of Persons ("CPP") must grant respectively
an authorization and a favorable opinion on the concerned trial.
Under Article L. 1123-7 of the PHC, the Committee For Protection of Persons (CPP) must give its
opinion on the conditions for the validity of the research, in particular as regards the protection of
participants, the information provided to them and the procedure followed to obtain their informed
consent, as well as the relevance of the research, the adequacy of the assessment of the expected
benefits and risks and the adequacy between the objectives pursued and the means implemented, the
qualifications of the investigator(s), the amounts and conditions for compensation of the participants
and the method of recruitment of participants.
-
Authorization of the ANSM
After submission of the complete clinical trial application file – containing an administrative file, a
research file including in particular the protocol and brochure for the investigator and, where
applicable, a technical file relating to the product, the acts performed and the methods used, as well
as the opinion of the ethics committee (if available) – the ANSM may inform the sponsor that it opposes
the implementation of the research or request any additional information from the sponsor to decide
on the application. The latter may then modify the content of the research project and submit the
modified or completed application to the ANSM; this procedure may not, however, be followed more
than once for each project in order to get the initial authorization. If the sponsor does not modify the
content of his application or does not produce the requested elements within the prescribed time
limits, he shall be deemed to have abandoned his application.
In accordance with Article R. 1123-38 of the PHC, the time limit for the examination of a clinical trial
authorization application may not exceed 60 days from the receipt of the complete file, except for a
number of products listed in Article R. 1123-7 of the PHC. Finally, in accordance with Article L. 1123-
11 of the PHC, in the event of a risk to public health or in the absence of a response from the sponsor
or if the ANSM considers that the conditions under which the research is conducted no longer
correspond to those indicated in the application for authorization or do not comply with the provisions
of Title 2 of Book 1 of Part 1 of the PHC, it may, at any time, request that changes be made to the
procedures for conducting the research, to any document relating to the research, and suspend or ban
such research.
The decision of 24 November 2006 lays down the rules of good clinical practice ("GCP") in the conduct
of interventional clinical trials on drugs for human use provided for in Article L. 1121-3 of the PHC. The
objective of GCPs is to ensure the reliability of clinical trial data and the protection of clinical trial
participants. GCPs should apply to all clinical trials, including pharmacokinetic, bioavailability and
bioequivalence studies (phase 1 studies) in healthy volunteers.
76
-
Authorization under regulation 536/2014
The European regulation 536/2014, that went into effect on 23 January 2022, harmonizes the
assessment and supervision processes for clinical trials throughout the EEA via a Clinical Trial
Information System (CTIS). This includes a single clinical trial application dossier, covering CTA
submitted to all Member States (MS), for submissions to national competent authorities and ethics
committees.
In order to obtain an authorization, the sponsor shall submit a unique application dossier to the
intended member states concerned through the CTIS, and obtain separate authorizations: one
coordinated assessment by the national competent authorities (referred as Part 1), and a national
assessment by national ethics committees for each intended Member States (referred as Part 2).
During the evaluation of CTAs, the Member States Concerned have the possibility to require
clarifications to the Sponsors by raising requests for information, that should be addressed within the
defined timelines. Failing to provide responses within the timelines will lead to the application being
lapsed.
For part 1, a single finale decision will be notified to the Sponsor, applicable for all participating
Member States. For part 2, each national Ethics Committees will notify the final decision to the
Sponsor. Both authorizations are needed in order to perform the clinical studies in all Member States.
-
Protection of clinical trial subjects
Under French law, in accordance with Article L. 1121-2 of the PHC, research involving the human
person may only be undertaken if: (i) it is based on the latest state of scientific knowledge and sufficient
preclinical experimentation, (ii) the foreseeable risk to the subjects is proportionate to the expected
benefit to them or the interest of the research, (iii) it aims to extend the scientific knowledge of the
human being and the means likely to improve his condition and (iv) it has been designed to minimize
pain, inconvenience, fear and any other foreseeable inconvenience associated with the disease or
research, taking particular account of the degree of maturity of minors and the capacity of
understanding for adults who are not able to express their consent. Research can only begin if all these
conditions are met.
In accordance with Article L. 1121-3 of the PHC, research involving the human person may only be
undertaken if it is carried out under the following conditions: (a) under the direction and supervision
of a doctor with appropriate experience and (b) under material and technical conditions appropriate
to the research and compatible with the requirements of scientific rigor and safety of the persons
carrying out the research.
Two documents must be provided to research subjects before the trial is conducted.
First of all, pursuant to Article L. 1122-1 of the PHC, the research subject must receive information
from the investigator or a doctor representing him or her, prior to the conduct of the research, in
particular concerning: the objective, methodology and duration of the research; the expected benefits;
in the case of interventional research, the constraints and foreseeable risks resulting from the
administration of the products used in the research, including in the event of termination of the
research before its end, any medical alternatives, the conditions of medical care after completion of
the research, if applicable; the favorable opinion of the ethics committee and the authorization of the
ANSM; the processing of personal data. The information provided is summarized in a written
document given to the person whose consent is sought. The person whose participation is requested
or, where applicable, the persons, bodies or authorities responsible for assisting, representing or
authorizing the research shall be informed of his or her right to refuse to participate in the research,
to withdraw his or her consent or, where applicable, his or her authorization at any time, without
incurring any liability or prejudice as a result.
77
Then, under Article L. 1122-1-1 of the PHC, interventional research cannot be carried out without his
or her free and informed consent, collected in writing, after the information provided for in Article L.
1122-1 of the PHC has been provided. No interventional research that involves only minimal risks and
constraints may be conducted on a person without his or her free, informed and express consent. No
non-interventional research may be conducted on a person when he or she has objected.
Research involving the human person on a minor may only be undertaken if the informed consent of
the parents or legal representative has been obtained. Research involving the human person on adults
under guardianship requires the informed consent of the legal representative.
-
Liability of the sponsor
Under Article L. 1121-10 of the PHC, the sponsor must assume liability for compensation for any
harmful consequences of the research to the benefit of the participant and his or her successors in
title, unless the sponsor can prove that the damage is not attributable to his fault or that of any
intervener, when it is not caused by third party or the voluntary withdrawal of the person who initially
consented to participate in the research.
Under the same article L. 1121-10 of the PHC, any interventional research (as mentioned in 1° or 2° of
article L. 1121-1 of the PHC) requires the prior subscription, by its sponsor, of an insurance
guaranteeing its civil liability defined in this article and that of any intervener, regardless of the nature
of the links existing between the interveners and the sponsor. The provisions of this article are of public
order.
-
Declarations of financial interests (French Sunshine Act and anti-gifts provisions)
Law No. 2011-2012 of 29 December 2011 on strengthening the health safety of drugs and health
products, as amended, supplemented by the decree No. 2012-745 of 9 May 2012 on public declaration
of interests and transparency in matters of public health and health security, introduced rules on the
transparency of remuneration received by certain health professionals from companies producing or
marketing health products reimbursed by social security (Article L. 1453-1 of the PHC). These
provisions were subsequently redefined and extended by Decree No. 2016-1939 of 28 December 2016
and Decree No. 2018-1126 of 11 December 2018 and strengthened more recently by Law No. 2019-
774 of 24 July 2019. These provisions require companies producing or marketing health products in
France, whether or not reimbursed, or providing services associated with these products, to make
health professionals for a certain amount (i.e. currently exceeding 10 euros, it being specified that this
amount should be amended in the coming months), as well as the existence of agreements concluded
with them, accompanied by specific information on each agreement (its precise purpose, the date of
signature of the agreement, its duration, the direct beneficiary and the final beneficiary and the
amount paid).
The French anti-gift rule, extended by the Law No. 2011-2012 as amended by Ordinance No. 2017-49
and the Law No. 2016-41 of 26 January 2016 modernizing the French healthcare system, as amended
by Ordinance No. 2017-49 of 19 January 2017, which extended its scope, also strengthened the rules
on benefits proposed or offered by persons manufacturing or marketing health products or services to
healthcare professionals (as described in Section 2.2.7.2 “The Company is subject to healthcare laws
and regulations which may require substantial compliance efforts and could expose the Company to
criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and
future earnings, among other penalties”).
Marketing Approval
In the EEA, drugs can only be commercialized after obtaining a marketing authorization. There are
three types of marketing authorizations:
78
the Community marketing authorization, which is issued by the European Commission
through the Centralized Procedure under Regulation (EC) No. 726/2004 of 31 March 2004
laying down Community procedures for the authorization and supervision of drugs for
human and veterinary use and establishing a European Medicines Agency, based on the
opinion of the Committee for Drugs for Human Use (the “CHMP”) of the EMA, and which
is valid throughout the entire territory of the EEA. The Centralized Procedure is mandatory
for certain types of products, such as biotechnology drugs, orphan drugs, and drugs
containing an entirely new active substance indicated for the treatment of AIDS, cancer,
neurodegenerative disorders, diabetes, auto immune and viral diseases. The Centralized
Procedure is optional for products containing a new active substance not yet authorized
in the EEA, or for products that constitute a significant therapeutic, scientific, or technical
innovation or which are in the interest of public health in the EU.
under the Decentralized Procedure (“DCP”), governed by Directive No. 2001/83/EC of 6
November 2001 on the Community code relating to drugs for human use, as amended by
Directive 2004/27marketing authorizations are granted in each concerned Member States
to products not falling within the mandatory scope of the Centralized Procedure. An
identical dossier is submitted to the competent authorities of each of the Member States
in which the marketing authorization is sought, one of which being selected by the
applicant as the reference member state (“RMS”). The competent authority of the RMS
prepares a draft assessment report, a draft summary of the product characteristic (“SPC”),
and a draft of the labeling and package leaflet, which are sent to the other Member States
(referred to as the Concerned Member States) for their approval. If the Concerned
Member States raise no objections, based on a potential serious risk to public health, to
the assessment, SPC, labeling, and/or packaging proposed by the RMS, the product is
subsequently granted a national marketing authorization in all of the selected Member
States (i.e., in the RMS and the selected Concerned Member States). Where the marketing
of a product has already been authorized in a Member State of the EEA, this DCP approval
can be recognized in other Member States through the Mutual Recognition Procedure (the
MRP”).
National Procedure marketing authorizations, which are issued by a single competent
authority of the Member States of the EEA and only covers their respective territory, are
also available for products not falling within the mandatory scope of the Centralized
Procedure. Once a product has been authorized for marketing in a Member State of the
EEA through the National Procedure, this National Procedure marketing authorization can
also be recognized in other Member States through the MRP.
Under the procedures described above, before granting the marketing authorization, the EMA or the
competent authority(ies) of the Member State(s) of the EEA assesses the risk-benefit balance of the
product on the basis of scientific criteria concerning its quality, safety and efficacy.
Post-Approval requirements
The holder of a Community marketing authorization or National marketing authorization is subject to
various obligations under applicable EEA regulations, such as pharmacovigilance obligations, requiring
it to, among other things, report and maintain detailed records of adverse reactions, and to submit
periodic safety update reports to the competent authorities. The holder must also ensure that the
manufacturing and batch release of its product is in compliance with the applicable requirements. The
marketing authorization holder is further obliged to ensure that the advertising and promotion of its
products complies with applicable laws, which can differ from Member State to Member State of the
EEA.
79
-
Pharmacovigilance
Under Directive 2010/84/EU of 15 December 2010 amending, as regards pharmacovigilance, Directive
2001/83/EC and Regulation (EU) No. 1235/2010 of 15 December 2010, the holder of a Centralized or
National marketing authorization must establish and maintain a pharmacovigilance system.
It must designate a Qualified Person Responsible for Pharmacovigilance (the "QPPV"). Its main
obligations include the recording of any suspected adverse effect, and prompt reporting of any
suspected serious adverse reactions and the submission of periodic pharmacovigilance update reports
("PSURs").
All new MA applications must include a Risk Management Plan ("RMP") setting out measures to
prevent or minimize the risks associated with the drug. The authorities may make the MA conditional
on the fulfilment of specific obligations. These risk reduction measures or post-authorization
obligations may include, without being limited to, enhanced safety monitoring, more frequent
submission of PSURs or the conduct of additional clinical trials or post-authorization safety studies.
RMP and PSURs are regularly made available to third parties upon request, subject to adequate
protection of commercial information (i.e., redaction of confidential information before disclosure).
-
Advertising
Any advertising or promotion of a drug must comply with the authorized summary of its characteristics
and therefore any promotion of unauthorized characteristics is prohibited.
Advertising of prescription drugs directly to the consumer is also prohibited in the EU. Although the
general principles for the advertising and promotion of drugs are laid down by EU directives, the details
are governed by the regulations of each Member State and may differ from one country to another.
In France, following the adoption of Law No. 2011-2012 of 29 December 2011, any kind of authorized
advertising and promotion of drugs and certain medical devices requires prior approval from the
ANSM. Advertising and promotional materials for drugs must be submitted to the ANSM following a
specific timetable. Any advertising must (i) comply with the provisions of the marketing authorization
and the treatment strategy recommended by the French Health Authority (Haute Autorité de Santé),
(ii) present the drug objectively and encourage proper use, and (iii) must not be misleading nor
adversely impact the protection of public health.
-
Pricing and reimbursement
Once the marketing authorization has been granted, decisions on pricing and reimbursement shall be
taken at the level of each Member State, taking into account the potential role and use of the drug
within the national health system of the country concerned.
In France, pricing and reimbursement are governed by framework agreements entered into between
the French Pricing Committee (Comité économique des produits de santé, the “CEPS”) and each
company authorized to market pharmaceutical products (“exploitant”), on the basis of a framework
entered into with the relevant professional organization representing the industry.
All drugs are subject to a health technology assessment carried out by the French Health Authority
(Haute Autorité de Santé, the “HAS”) before inclusion on a positive list of reimbursed products. Such
assessment is based on medical evidence.
80
Pharmaceutical Approval outside the European Union
The FDA and comparable regulatory authorities in state and local jurisdictions and in other countries
impose substantial and onerous requirements upon companies involved in the clinical development,
manufacture, marketing and distribution of drugs, such as those that the Company is developing.
These agencies and other federal, state and local entities regulate, among other things, the research
and development, testing, manufacture, quality control, safety, effectiveness, labeling, storage, record
keeping, approval, advertising and promotion, distribution, post-approval monitoring and reporting,
sampling and export and import of the Company’s drug candidates.
If the Company does not comply with the applicable requirements relating to authorization,
advertising, pharmacovigilance, or pricing, it could be subject to fines, suspensions or withdrawals of
regulatory approvals, drug recalls, drug seizures, operating restrictions and criminal proceedings,
among other things.
U.S. Government Regulation
In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the FDCA, and its implementing regulations. The
process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with applicable federal,
state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and
financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable U.S. requirements at any time during the
product development process, approval process or after approval, may subject an applicant to a variety
of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as the FDA's refusal to approve pending new drug
applications (“NDAs”), withdrawal of an approval, imposition of a clinical hold, issuance of warning
letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution,
injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement or civil or criminal
penalties.
The process required by the FDA before a drug may be marketed in the United States generally involves
the following):
completion of preclinical laboratory studies, animal studies and formulation studies in compliance
with the FDA's GLP regulations;
submission to the FDA of an IND application, which must become effective before human clinical
trials may begin in the US;
approval by the IRB at each clinical site before each trial may be initiated;
performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with GCP
requirements to establish the safety and efficacy of the proposed drug product for each indication;
FDA review and approval of the NDA or BLA, upon (i) satisfactory completion of an FDA advisory
committee review, if applicable, and (ii) satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of clinical sites
where the studies to assess compliance with GCP were conducted and the manufacturing facility,
the sponsor or facilities at which the product is produced to assess compliance with cGMP
requirements and to assure that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve the
drug's identity, strength, quality and purity, andiii) the FDA assigned reviewers, including experts in
biopharmaceutics, chemistry, clinical microbiology, pharmacology/toxicology, and statistics
content experts provide recommendations and are used by senior FDA staff in its final evaluation
of the NDA or BLA. Based on that final evaluation, the FDA then provides to the NDA or BLA’s
sponsor an approval, or a “complete response” letter if the NDA or BLA application is not approved.
Preclinical Studies
An IND sponsor must submit the results of the preclinical studies, together with manufacturing
information, analytical data and any available clinical data or literature, among other things, to the
FDA as part of an IND, in order to be authorized to conduct clinical research in the United States. The
81
FDA has 30 days to allow the IND to proceed or raise concerns or questions related to one or more
proposed clinical trials, in which case the clinical trial is placed on a clinical hold. The IND sponsor and
the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. As a result,
submission of an IND may not result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to commence.
Clinical Trials
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational drug to human patients under the
supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include the
requirement that all research patients provide their informed consent in writing for their participation
in any clinical trial. Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the
objectives of the trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to
be evaluated. A protocol for each clinical trial to be conducted in the US of an investigational drug and
any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. In addition,
an IRB at each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any
clinical trial before it commences at that institution. Information about certain clinical trials must be
submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health for public dissemination on
Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the
FDA and more frequently if serious adverse events occur. Each of Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical
trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, or at all. Furthermore, the FDA
may impose a clinical hold at any time which includes during an ongoing clinical trial if, for example,
safety concerns arise, in which case the trial cannot recommence without the FDA’s authorization. A
clinical hold can result in a substantial delay and expense. The sponsor may suspend or terminate a
clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research patients are being
exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical
trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB's
requirements or if the drug has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.)
Marketing Approval
When a pharmaceutical company has gathered data that it believes sufficiently demonstrates a drug’s
safety, efficacy and quality, then the company may file a New Drug Application (NDA) or Biologics
License Application (BLA), as applicable, for the drug. The NDA or BLA must contain all the scientific
information that has been gathered about the drug and proposed labeling, among other things. In
addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, as amended and reauthorized, certain NDAs
or supplements to an NDA must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness
of the drug for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing
and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. The
FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant deferrals for submission of some
or all pediatric data until after approval of the product for use in adults, or full or partial waivers from
the pediatric data requirements.
The FDA also may require submission of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategies plan (“REMS”) plan
to ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh its risks. The REMS plan could include medication
guides, physician communication plans, assessment plans, or elements to assure safe use, such as
restricted distribution methods, patient registries, or other risk minimization tools.
After evaluating the NDA and all related information, including the possibility of an advisory committee
recommendation, if any, and inspection reports regarding the manufacturing facilities, the sponsor
and clinical trial sites, the FDA may issue an approval letter, or, in some cases, a complete response
letter. A complete response letter generally contains a statement of specific conditions that must be
met in order to secure final approval of the NDA and may require additional clinical or preclinical
testing in order for the FDA to reconsider the application. Even with submission of this additional
82
information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria
for approval. If and when those conditions have been met to the FDA's satisfaction, the FDA will
typically issue an approval letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with
specific prescribing information for specific indications.
Even if the FDA approves a product, it may limit the approved indications for use of the product,
require that contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling, require
that post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess a drug's
safety after approval, require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the product after
commercialization, or impose other conditions, including distribution and use restrictions or other risk
management mechanisms under a REMS, which can materially affect the potential market and
profitability of the product. The FDA may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the
results of post-marketing studies or surveillance programs.
505(b)(2) NDAs
As an alternative path to FDA approval for modifications to formulations or uses of products previously
approved by the FDA, an applicant may submit an NDA under Section 505(b)(2) of the FDCA.
Section 505(b)(2) was enacted as part of the Hatch-Waxman Amendments and permits the filing of an
NDA where at least some of the information required for approval comes from studies not conducted
by, or for, the applicant. If the 505(b)(2) applicant can establish that reliance on FDA's previous findings
of safety and effectiveness is scientifically appropriate, it may eliminate the need to conduct certain
preclinical or clinical studies of the new product. The FDA may also require companies to perform
additional studies or measurements, including clinical trials, to support the change from the approved
reference drug. The FDA may then approve the new drug candidate for all, or some, of the label
indications for which the reference drug has been approved, as well as for any new indication sought
by the 505(b)(2) applicant.
Post-Approval Requirements
Drugs manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing
regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, requirements relating to recordkeeping, periodic
reporting, product sampling and distribution, advertising and promotion and reporting of adverse
experiences with the product. After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding
new indications or other labeling claims are subject to prior FDA review and approval. In addition, drug
manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are
required to register their establishments with the FDA and state agencies, and are subject to periodic
unannounced inspections by the FDA and these state agencies for compliance with cGMP
requirements. Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA
approval before being implemented.
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory
requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the
market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of
unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with
regulatory requirements, may result in mandatory revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety
information; imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks; or imposition
of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS program. Other potential consequences include,
among other things:
restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, complete withdrawal of
the product from the market or product recalls;
fines, warning letters or holds on post-approval clinical trials;
83
refusal of the FDA to approve pending NDAs or supplements to approved NDAs, or
suspension or revocation of product approvals;
product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; or
injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of products that are placed
on the market. Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the
provisions of the approved label. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations
prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted
off-label uses may be subject to significant fines and liability.
Coverage and Reimbursement
Sales of the Company’s drug candidates, if approved, will depend, in part, on the extent to which such
products will be covered by third-party payors, such as government health care programs, commercial
insurance and managed healthcare organizations. These third-party payors determine which
medications they will cover and establish reimbursement levels. In addition, these third-party payors
are increasingly limiting coverage or reducing reimbursements for medical products and services. In
the United States, no uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for products exists among third-
party payors. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for products can differ significantly from payor
to payor. In addition, the U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have continued
implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement
and requirements for substitution of generic products. Patients who are prescribed medications for
the treatment of their conditions, and their prescribing physicians, generally rely on third-party payors
to reimburse all or part of the costs associated with their prescription drugs. Patients are unlikely to
use the Company’s drug candidates unless coverage is provided and reimbursement is adequate to
cover all or a significant portion of the cost of the products. As a result, adoption of price controls and
cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing
controls and measures, could further limit the Company’s net revenue and results. Decreases in third-
party reimbursement for the Company’s drug candidates or a decision by a third-party payor to not
cover the Company’s drug candidates could reduce physician usage of the drug candidates, once
approved, and have a material adverse effect on the Company’s sales, results of operations and
financial condition.
Other Healthcare Laws
The Company will also be subject to healthcare regulation and enforcement by the U.S. federal
government and the states and foreign governments in which it will conduct its business once the drug
candidates are approved. Failure to comply with these laws, where applicable, can result in the
imposition of significant administrative, civil, and criminal penalties. The laws that may affect the
Company’s ability to operate in the United States include:
the federal healthcare programs' Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things,
persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly
or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual for, or the purchase,
order or recommendation of, any good or service for which payment may be made under federal
healthcare programs such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
federal false claims and civil monetary penalties laws, including the civil False Claims Act, which
prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be
presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payors that are false
or fraudulent;
the U.S. federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (the “HIPAA”), which
created additional federal criminal statutes that impose criminal and civil liability for, among other
84
things, executing or attempting to execute a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program
or knowingly and willingly falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making false
statements relating to healthcare matters;
the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics,
and medical supplies to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (the
”CMS”), information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians (defined to
include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors) and teaching hospitals, and
ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members;
certain state laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain
circumstances, some of which are more stringent than HIPAA and many of which differ from each
other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance efforts.
In addition, many states have similar laws and regulations, such as anti-kickback and false claims laws
that may be broader in scope and may apply regardless of payor, in addition to items and services
reimbursed under Medicaid and other state programs. Further, certain states enacted laws that
require: pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry's voluntary
compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government;
drug manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to
physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures; the reporting of information
related to drug pricing; the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives. In addition, certain
states enacted legislation to govern the privacy and security of health information, many of which
differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating
compliance efforts. Additionally, to the extent that its product is sold in a foreign country, the Company
may be subject to similar foreign laws.
Healthcare Reform
Current and future legislative proposals to further reform healthcare or reduce healthcare costs may
result in lower reimbursement for the Company’s drug candidates, if and when approved. The cost
containment measures that payors and providers are instituting and the effect of any healthcare
reform initiative implemented in the future could significantly reduce the Company’s revenues from
the sale of its drug candidates, if and when approved.
Recently, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny recently over the manner in which
manufacturers set prices for their marketed products. At the federal level, the current administration's
budget proposals for fiscal years 2019 and 2020 contain further drug price control measures that could
be enacted during the budget process or in other future legislation. At the state level, legislatures are
increasingly passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and
biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions
on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some
cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
The Company expects that additional U.S. federal and state, as well as foreign, healthcare reform
measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could result in reduced demand for its drug
candidates, if and when approved, or additional pricing pressure.
Pharmaceutical Approval in Japan
In Japan, new drug applications are filed with the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (the
PMDA), one of the independent administrative agencies for the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare
(the “MHLW”). During the review process, the quality, efficacy, and safety of that new drugs are
evaluated by a review team from the evaluation division in PMDA in light of current scientific and
technological standards. In addition, GLP/GCP/Document-based Conformity inspections to ensure the
submitted data are done by an inspection team from the non-clinical and clinical division in PMDA in
compliance with the ethical and scientific standards, and GMP inspections to ensure quality
85
management of the manufacturing facility for that new drugs are done by an inspection team from the
manufacturing quality division in PMDA in parallel. Afterwards, the review and inspection results,
created by PMDA, are reported to the MHLW for further review by “the Committee on Drugs” and “the
Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council”. Based on the review results of both Committees,
(the MHLW makes the final decision on the drug's outcome. Once the MHLW has approved the new
drug application, the national health insurance price (NHIP) for that new drug is officially listed by
MHLW within 60 days (90 days at the latest) after the approval. The applicant may market and sell that
new drug after NHIP listing.
2.1.10 Facilities
The Company leases 450 square meters of office space in Lyon, France under a lease that expires in
August 2024 and 904 square meters of office space in Lyon under a lease that expires in March 2027,
with an opt out provision in March 2024.
The Company also occupies additional office space in Paris under monthly contracts, as well as office
space in Tokyo under a one-year contract, automatically renewable in February 2023.
The Company also leases 4,089 square feet of office space in Burlington, MA in the United States under
a lease that was executed in April 2019, and expires in June 2024, with opt out provisions after 36 and
48 months, and an option to extend.
2.1.11 Legal Proceedings
From time-to-time, the Company may be a party to legal, administrative or arbitration proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of its business.
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, the Company is not a party to any material
legal, administrative or arbitration proceedings that, if determined adversely to it, would individually
or taken together have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on the Company because of defense
and settlement costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.
2.1.12 Trends
In the context of the COVID-19 outbreak, which was declared a pandemic by the World Health
Organization (WHO) on March 12, 2020, the Company is regularly reviewing the impact of the outbreak
on its business. The Company is also monitoring the potential impact of the recent geopolitical events
in Ukraine and Russia, although the Company does not have any activity in these territories.
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, and based on publicly available information,
the Company has not identified the occurrence of any material negative effect on its business due to
the COVID-19 pandemic that remains unresolved, other than the impact on the commercialization of
TWYMEEG® in Japan by the Company's partner Sumitomo Pharma. Similarly, the Company has not
identified the occurrence of any material negative effect on its business due to the recent geopolitical
events in Ukraine and Russia. However, the Company anticipates that the COVID-19 pandemic could
have further material negative impact on its business operations. The worldwide impact of COVID-19
may notably affect the Company’s internal organization and efficiency, particularly in countries where
it operates and where confinement measures are implemented by the authorities. In addition, COVID-
19 as well as recent geopolitical events in Ukraine and Russia may impact market conditions and the
Company’s ability to seek additional funding or enter into partnerships. Particularly, delays in the
supply of drug substance or drug products, in the initiation or the timing of results of preclinical and/or
clinical trials, as well as delays linked to the responsiveness of regulatory authorities could occur, which
could potentially have an impact on the Company’s development programs and partnered programs.
The Company will continue to actively monitor the situation.
86
2.2
Risk factors
Any investment in a Company involves a degree of risk. Potential investors are asked to read attentively
all the information contained in this Universal Registration Document, and especially consider all the
risks associated with such an investment, including the risk factors described in this section, before
deciding to subscribe or acquire shares of the Company.
The Company performed a review of risks that could have an unfavorable effect on the Company, its
business, prospects, capacity to meet its objectives, financial position, cash flows or operating results.
In application of and in accordance with article 16 of the Prospectus Regulation, the risk factors section
of this Universal Registration Document has been prepared in order to enhance and improve their
clarity. The attention of potential investors is drawn to the fact that, the list of risks presented below is
not exhaustive in application of article 16 of the Prospectus Regulation pursuant to which only
significant risks should be disclosed in this Universal Registration Document.
Other risks or uncertainties that are unknown or have not been considered, as of the date of this
Universal Registration Document, as likely to have a significant unfavorable effect may exist, and the
manifestation of one or more of these risks could have a significant unfavorable result on the Company,
its business, prospects, capacity to meet its objectives, financial position, cash flows or operating
results.
The internal review of the risks is regularly analyzed within the risk management processes of the
Company, including through their mapping by the Company’s management and its review by the Audit
Committee. Seven different categories have been therefore identified by the Company, as indicated
below. Only the most significant risks are presented below, following the implementation of the risk
management processes of the Company.
The table below indicates the probability of occurrence and the magnitude of their potential negative
impact of the main risks identified by the Company. The probability of occurrence has been assessed
on three different levels (“High”, “Moderate” and “Low”) and the potential negative impact has been
assessed on four different levels (“Critical”, “High”, “Moderate” and “Low”). In each category, the risks
with the highest probability of occurrence and potential negative impact are mentioned first.
87
NEGATIVE
IMPACT IN
CASE OF
PROBABILITY
OF
NATURE OF THE RISK
TREND
OCCURRENCE
OCCURRENCE
RISKS RELATED TO PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT AND REGULATORY APPROVAL
DRUG CANDIDATES UNDER DEVELOPMENT MUST UNDERGO COSTLY,
RIGOROUS AND HIGHLY REGULATED PRECLINICAL STUDIES AND
CLINICAL TRIALS, WHOSE TIME OF COMPLETION, NUMBER AND
OUTCOMES ARE UNCERTAIN.
HIGH
CRITICAL
CRITICAL
THE COMPANY CANNOT BE CERTAIN THAT PXL770 OR PXL065 WILL
RECEIVE REGULATORY APPROVAL OR THAT IMEGLIMIN WILL RECEIVE
APPROVAL IN ADDITIONAL TERRITORIES OUTSIDE JAPAN, AND
WITHOUT REGULATORY APPROVAL, THE COMPANY WILL NOT BE ABLE
TO COMMERCIALIZE ITS DRUG CANDIDATES.
HIGH
THE COMPANYS DRUG CANDIDATES MAY CAUSE UNDESIRABLE SIDE
EFFECTS OR HAVE OTHER PROPERTIES THAT COULD DELAY OR
PREVENT THEIR REGULATORY APPROVAL, OR, IF APPROVAL IS
RECEIVED, REQUIRE SUCH DRUG CANDIDATES TO BE TAKEN OFF THE
MARKET, REQUIRE THEM TO INCLUDE SAFETY WARNINGS OR
OTHERWISE LIMIT THEIR SALES.
HIGH
HIGH
CRITICAL
CLINICAL FAILURE CAN OCCUR AT ANY STAGE OF CLINICAL
DEVELOPMENT. THE RESULTS OF EARLIER CLINICAL TRIALS ARE NOT
NECESSARILY PREDICTIVE OF FUTURE RESULTS AND ANY DRUG
CANDIDATE THE COMPANY ADVANCES THROUGH CLINICAL TRIALS MAY
NOT HAVE FAVORABLE RESULTS IN LATER CLINICAL TRIALS.
CRITICAL
THE COVID-19 EPIDEMIC COULD HAVE A SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON
THE COMPANYS ACTIVITIES
MODERATE
HIGH
CRITICAL
CRITICAL
THE COMPANY IS DEVELOPING PXL065 AND PXL770 FOR THE
TREATMENT OF NASH AND X-LINKED ADRENOLEUKODYSTROPHY
(ALD), CONDITIONS FOR WHICH NO DRUGS HAVE YET BEEN
COMMERCIALIZED AND FOR WHICH THERE IS LITTLE CLINICAL
EXPERIENCE. AS
A
RESULT, THE COMPANYS DEVELOPMENT
APPROACH INVOLVES NEW ENDPOINTS AND METHODOLOGIES. THERE
IS A RISK THAT THE OUTCOME OF THE COMPANYS CLINICAL TRIALS
WILL NOT BE FAVORABLE OR THAT, EVEN IF FAVORABLE, REGULATORY
AUTHORITIES MAY NOT FIND THE RESULTS OF SUCH CLINICAL TRIALS
TO BE SUFFICIENT FOR MARKETING APPROVAL.
CHANGES IN REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, GUIDANCE FROM
REGULATORY AUTHORITIES OR UNANTICIPATED EVENTS DURING
CLINICAL TRIALS OF THE COMPANYS DRUG CANDIDATES COULD
NECESSITATE CHANGES TO CLINICAL TRIAL PROTOCOLS OR
ADDITIONAL CLINICAL TRIAL REQUIREMENTS, WHICH WOULD RESULT
IN INCREASED COSTS TO THE COMPANY AND COULD DELAY ITS
DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE.
HIGH
HIGH
THE NUMBER OF PATIENT SUFFERING FROM X-LINKED
ADRENOLEUKODYSTROPHY (ALD) THAT THE COMPANY IS TARGETING
IS SMALL AND HAS NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED WITH PRECISION. IF THE
ACTUAL NUMBER OF PATIENTS IS SMALLER THAN THE COMPANY
HIGH
HIGH
88
ESTIMATES, ITS REVENUE AND ABILITY TO ACHIEVE PROFITABILITY MAY
BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED
THE COMPANY MAY BE UNABLE TO OBTAIN CERTAIN SPECIFIC DISEASE
DESIGNATION FOR PXL065 OR PXL770 FOR THE TREATMENT OF X-
LINKED ADRENOLEUKODYSTROPHY (ALD). IN ADDITION, SPECIFIC
DISEASE DESIGNATION BY THE FDA AND THE EMA MAY NOT LEAD TO
MODERATE
CRITICAL
A
FASTER DEVELOPMENT, REGULATORY REVIEW OR APPROVAL
PROCESS, AND IT DOES NOT INCREASE THE LIKELIHOOD THAT PXL065
OR PXL770 WILL RECEIVE ADDITIONAL MARKETING APPROVALS IN
THE UNITED STATES OR A MARKETING AUTHORIZATION IN THE EU
THE COMPANY MAY DEVELOP ITS DRUG CANDIDATES FOR USE IN
COMBINATION WITH OTHER THERAPIES, WHICH MAY DELAY OR
PROHIBIT THEIR MARKETABILITY OR EXPOSES IT TO ADDITIONAL RISKS
HIGH
MODERATE
RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANYS FINANCIAL POSITION AND NEED FOR ADDITIONAL CAPITAL
THE COMPANY WILL NEED TO RAISE ADDITIONAL FUNDING, WHICH
MAY NOT BE AVAILABLE ON ACCEPTABLE TERMS, OR AT ALL, AND
FAILURE TO OBTAIN THIS NECESSARY CAPITAL WHEN NEEDED MAY
FORCE THE COMPANY TO DELAY, LIMIT OR TERMINATE ITS PRODUCT
DEVELOPMENT EFFORTS OR OTHER OPERATIONS.
HIGH
CRITICAL
THE COMPANY HAS GENERATED VERY LIMITED REVENUES FROM
PRODUCT SALES TO DATE AND HAS ALSO ACCUMULATED FISCAL
LOSSES SINCE INCORPORATION THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 2021, OF
€179 MILLION. CURRENTLY, THE COMPANY HAS ONE PRODUCT
APPROVED FOR COMMERCIAL SALE, TWYMEEG® IN JAPAN. AS A
RESULT, ITS ABILITY TO REDUCE LOSSES AND REACH CONSISTENT
PROFITABILITY FROM PRODUCT SALES IS UNPROVEN, AND THE
COMPANY MAY NEVER SUSTAIN PROFITABILITY.
HIGH
CRITICAL
IF THE COMPANY, ITS PARTNER SUMITOMO PHARMA OR ITS POTENTIAL
FUTURE PARTNERS DO NOT ACHIEVE ITS PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT OR
COMMERCIALIZATION OBJECTIVES IN THE TIMEFRAMES THE COMPANY
EXPECTS, THE COMPANY MAY NOT RECEIVE PRODUCT REVENUE,
MILESTONES OR ROYALTY PAYMENTS AND THE COMPANY MAY NOT BE
ABLE TO CONDUCT ITS OPERATIONS AS PLANNED.
HIGH
HIGH
CRITICAL
THE REVENUES GENERATED FROM THE COMPANYS COLLABORATION
AND LICENSE AGREEMENT HAVE CONTRIBUTED AND ARE EXPECTED TO
CONTRIBUTE A LARGE PORTION OF THE COMPANYS REVENUE FOR THE
FORESEEABLE FUTURE.
HIGH
RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANYS DEPENDENCE ON THIRD PARTIES
THE COMPANY HAS ESTABLISHED A PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH
SUMITOMO PHARMA FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AND
HIGH
CRITICAL
COMMERCIALIZATION OF IMEGLIMIN, AND THE COMPANY DEPENDS
UPON THIS PARTNER FOR THE EXECUTION OF ITS DEVELOPMENT AND
COMMERCIALIZATION PROGRAMS.
THE LATE-STAGE DEVELOPMENT AND MARKETING OF THE COMPANYS
DRUG CANDIDATES IN NASH AND DIABETES OUTSIDE JAPAN MAY
PARTIALLY DEPEND ON ITS ABILITY TO ESTABLISH COLLABORATIONS
WITH MAJOR BIOPHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES.
HIGH
HIGH
89
THE COMPANY RELIES UPON A SMALL NUMBER OF THIRD-PARTY
SUPPLIERS.
MODERATE
HIGH
RISKS RELATED TO THE COMMERCIALIZATION OF THE COMPANYS DRUG CANDIDATES
EVEN IF THE COMPANY SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETES CLINICAL TRIALS
OF ITS DRUG CANDIDATES, THOSE CANDIDATES MAY NOT BE
COMMERCIALIZED SUCCESSFULLY FOR OTHER REASONS.
HIGH
CRITICAL
THERE ARE NUMEROUS COMPETITORS IN THE MARKET FOR
THERAPEUTIC TREATMENTS OF METABOLIC PATHOLOGIES.
MODERATE
HIGH
HIGH
GOVERNMENT RESTRICTIONS ON PRICING AND REIMBURSEMENT, AS
WELL AS OTHER HEALTHCARE PAYOR COST-CONTAINMENT INITIATIVES,
MAY NEGATIVELY IMPACT THE COMPANYS ABILITY TO GENERATE
REVENUES IF THE COMPANY OBTAINS REGULATORY APPROVAL TO
MARKET A PRODUCT
HIGH
THE COMPANYS DRUG CANDIDATES MAY FAIL TO ACHIEVE THE
DEGREE OF MARKET ACCEPTANCE BY PHYSICIANS, PATIENTS,
HEALTHCARE PRESCRIBERS, THIRD-PARTY PAYORS OR THE MEDICAL
COMMUNITY IN GENERAL NECESSARY FOR COMMERCIAL SUCCESS.
MODERATE
MODERATE
CRITICAL
HIGH
ANY OF THE COMPANYS DRUG CANDIDATES FOR WHICH THE
COMPANY OBTAINS MARKETING APPROVAL COULD BE SUBJECT TO
POST-MARKETING RESTRICTIONS OR WITHDRAWAL FROM THE MARKET,
AND THE COMPANY MAY BE SUBJECT TO SUBSTANTIAL PENALTIES IF
THE COMPANY FAILS TO COMPLY WITH REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
OR EXPERIENCES UNANTICIPATED PROBLEMS WITH ITS DRUGS
FOLLOWING APPROVAL.
RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANYS OPERATIONS
THE COMPANY MAY CHANGE ITS ORGANIZATION, AND AS A RESULT,
THE COMPANY MAY ENCOUNTER DIFFICULTIES IN MANAGING ITS
WORKFORCE, WHICH COULD DISRUPT ITS OPERATIONS.
MODERATE
HIGH
HIGH
HIGH
THE COMPANYS INTERNAL COMPUTER SYSTEMS, OR THOSE OF ITS
COLLABORATORS OR OTHER CONTRACTORS OR CONSULTANTS, MAY
FAIL OR SUFFER SECURITY BREACHES, WHICH COULD RESULT IN A
MATERIAL DISRUPTION OF ITS PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
AND BUSINESS OPERATIONS.
THE COMPANY MAY BE EXPOSED TO SIGNIFICANT FOREIGN EXCHANGE
RISK. EXCHANGE RATE FLUCTUATIONS MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE
FOREIGN CURRENCY VALUE OF THE ORDINARY SHARES.
HIGH
HIGH
RISKS RELATED TO THE COMPANYS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
THE COMPANYS ABILITY TO COMPETE MAY DECLINE IF THE COMPANY
IS UNABLE TO OR DOES NOT ADEQUATELY PROTECT ITS INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS OR IF ITS INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ARE
INADEQUATE FOR ITS TECHNOLOGY AND DRUG CANDIDATES.
MODERATE
CRITICAL
PATENT TERMS MAY BE INADEQUATE TO PROTECT THE COMPANYS
COMPETITIVE POSITION ON ITS DRUGS FOR AN ADEQUATE AMOUNT OF
TIME, AND THE COMPANY MAY SEEK TO RELY, BUT MAY NOT BE ABLE
HIGH
MODERATE
90
TO RELY, ON OTHER FORMS OF PROTECTION, SUCH AS REGULATORY
SPECIFICITY.
THE COMPANY WILL NOT SEEK TO PROTECT ITS INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS IN ALL JURISDICTIONS THROUGHOUT THE WORLD
AND THE COMPANY MAY NOT BE ABLE TO ADEQUATELY ENFORCE ITS
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS EVEN IN THE JURISDICTIONS WHERE
THE COMPANY SEEKS PROTECTION.
MODERATE
MODERATE
RISKS RELATED TO LEGAL AND COMPLIANCE MATTERS
FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH EUROPEAN RESTRICTIVE REGULATIONS
GOVERNING THE COLLECTION, USE, PROCESSING AND CROSS-BORDER
TRANSFER OF PERSONAL INFORMATION MAY RESULT IN SUBSTANTIAL
PENALTIES.
MODERATE
MODERATE
HIGH
HIGH
THE COMPANY IS SUBJECT TO HEALTHCARE LAWS AND REGULATIONS
WHICH MAY REQUIRE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLIANCE EFFORTS AND COULD
EXPOSE THE COMPANY TO CRIMINAL SANCTIONS, CIVIL PENALTIES,
CONTRACTUAL DAMAGES, REPUTATIONAL HARM AND DIMINISHED
PROFITS AND FUTURE EARNINGS, AMONG OTHER PENALTIES.
2.1.13 NE PAS SUPPRIMER
2.2.1 Risks Related to Product Development and Regulatory Approval
2.2.1.1 Drug candidates under development must undergo costly, rigorous and highly regulated
preclinical studies and clinical trials, whose time of completion, number and outcomes are
uncertain.
In order to obtain marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of its drug candidates,
the Company must conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate safety and utility of the drug
candidates. Preclinical studies and clinical trials are generally expensive, are difficult to design and
implement, can take many years to complete and are inherently uncertain as to outcome. The
Company cannot guarantee that any clinical trials will be conducted as planned or completed on
schedule, if at all. The Company may experience delays in drug development, for example there have
been occasional delays in the development of PXL770 and PXL065. In 2016, during the Phase 1 study
of PXL770, the Company observed a different metabolic pattern in humans compared to animals that
were treated with PXL770. Therefore, based on regulatory guidelines, the Company needed to further
evaluate the profile of the metabolites, which may have been pharmacologically active, prior to the
start of the second part of the Phase 1 study. As a result of this additional preclinical work, the second
part of the Phase 1b study, scheduled in 2016, was delayed for a period of 12 months. These delays
cost the Company additional development costs that it had not originally anticipated. In the same
manner, the COVID-19 outbreak may still have a significant impact on the Company’s timelines for the
development of its drug candidates. As an example, the Company initially planned to initiate a Phase 2
trial on PXL065 in the second quarter of 2020, but eventually initiated this study in September 2020 in
order to ensure a safe and stable environment for patient recruitment and the availability of clinical
trial sites during the COVID-19 outbreak. Eventually, the patient enrollment for this trial has been
completed in the third quarter of 2021.
It may take several years to complete the preclinical studies and clinical development necessary to
commercialize a drug candidate, and delays or failure can occur at any stage. The design of a clinical
trial can determine whether its results will support approval of a product, and flaws in the design of a
clinical trial may not become apparent until the clinical trial is well advanced. An unfavorable outcome
in one or more trials would be a major setback for the Company and its drug candidates. Due to the
Company’s limited financial resources, an unfavorable outcome in one or more trials may require the
91
Company to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more product development programs,
which could have a material adverse effect on its business and financial condition and on the value of
its securities.
In connection with clinical testing and trials for its drug candidates, the Company faces a number of
risks, including:
delays in reaching a consensus with the EMA, the FDA, the PMDA (as contemplated for the
current drug candidates developed by the Company), or other regulatory authorities on trial
design;
delays in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective contract research
organizations (“CROs”), and clinical trial sites;
due to the development of drug candidates as potential treatments for severe, life-threatening
diseases (see Section 2.2.1.3 “The Company’s drug candidates may cause undesirable side
effects or have other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, or, if
approval is received, require such drug candidates to be taken off the market, require them to
include safety warnings or otherwise limit their sales"), delays in (a) recruiting suitable patients
to participate in its future clinical trials or (b) in having patients complete participation in a
clinical trial or (c) return for post-treatment follow-up;
imposition of a clinical hold by regulatory authorities as a result of a serious adverse event or
after inspection of the Company's clinical trial operations or clinical trial sites;
failure to perform in accordance with GCPs, or applicable regulatory guidelines in Japan and
other key markets;
delays in the testing, validation, manufacturing and delivery of its drug candidates to the
clinical trial sites, including delays by third parties with whom the Company have contracted
to perform certain of those functions;
clinical trial sites dropping out of a clinical trial;
selection of clinical endpoints that require prolonged periods of clinical observation or analysis
of the resulting data;
patients may die or suffer other adverse effects for reasons that may or may not be related to
the drug candidate being tested;
extension studies on long-term tolerability could invalidate the use of its drug candidates; and
The results may not meet the level to establish the safety and efficacy of its drug candidates
or such regulatory authorities could interpret results in a manner differently than the Company
has.
The COVID-19 outbreak may still have a significant impact on some of these risks, in particular but not
limited to, the preclinical activities of the Company, the recruitment and maintenance of suitable
patients within its clinical trials, potential delays in the testing, validation, manufacturing and delivery
of its drug candidates to the clinical trial sites, including delays by third parties with whom the Company
have contracted to perform certain of those functions, difficulties to maintain clinical sites operational
throughout a clinical trial or death of patients linked to COVID-19. As an example, two clinical sites
which were selected for the Phase 2 trial on PXL065 could not recruit patients according to the planned
92
schedule due to COVID-19. Other difficulties could be encountered in the context of the two phase 2a
clinical Proof of Concept (POC) biomarker studies of PXL065 and PXL770 in X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD). Furthermore, the resources available in the healthcare industry of
certain countries, especially in the United States where the Company will conduct its clinical trials in
the short term, may be significantly impacted by COVID-19 as personal, sites and materials may be
diverted to fight the pandemic. The Company is monitoring the situation on a regular basis alone and
with its partners and CROs to prepare for mitigation plans should one of these risks materialize itself.
Success in preclinical studies and early clinical trials for the Company’s drug candidates does not ensure
that subsequent clinical trials will generate the same or similar results.
Any inability to successfully complete preclinical and clinical development could result in additional
costs to the Company or impair its ability to generate revenues from product sales, regulatory and
commercialization milestones and royalties. In addition, if the Company makes manufacturing or
formulation changes to its drug candidates, the Company may need to conduct additional studies to
bridge its modified drug candidates to earlier versions.
2.2.1.2 The Company cannot be certain that PXL770 or PXL065 or any of its future drug candidates
will receive regulatory approval, or that Imeglimin will receive approval in additional
territories outside Japan, and, without regulatory approval, the Company will not be able to
commercialize its drug candidates.
The Company currently has only one drug product approved for sale in Japan (Imeglimin), and the
Company cannot guarantee that it will ever have other drug products approved for commercialization
in the future or that Imeglimin will ever receive approval for commercialization in additional territories.
Its business and future success depends upon its ability to complete clinical development of its three
most advanced drug candidates, Imeglimin, PXL770 and PXL065 (whose stages of development are
detailed in Section 11 “General information, history and achievements over the period”), and obtain
regulatory approval for and successfully market these three drug candidates. Any failure to successfully
complete the development or marketing of Imeglimin, PXL770 or PXL065 or a significant delay in such
development or marketing could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects,
financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
The development of a drug candidate and its approval and marketing are subject to extensive
regulation by the FDA in the United States, the EMA in Europe, the PMDA in Japan (as contemplated
for the drug candidates currently developed by the Company) and regulatory authorities in other
countries, with regulations differing from country to country. The Company is not permitted to market
its drug candidates in the United States, Europe or Japan until the Company receives approval of an
NDA, from the FDA or the PMDA or a marketing authorization application from the EMA. The Company
has submitted one marketing application, which has been approved by the PMDA in June 2021 for the
commercialization of Imeglimin in Japan. The Company has not submitted any other marketing
applications.
Obtaining approval of a NDA or a marketing authorization application is a lengthy, expensive and
uncertain process, and the Company may not be successful in obtaining approval. The FDA, EMA and
PMDA review processes can take years to complete, and approval is never guaranteed. This was the
case when Sumitomo Pharma submitted a registration dossier (a Japanese New Drug Application, or
JNDA) for Imeglimin in July of 2020, with first product launch in Japan which occurred in September
2021. Japan has taken approximately one year to review the JNDA for Imeglimin. If the Company
submits an NDA to the FDA, the FDA must decide whether to accept or reject the submission for filing.
The Company cannot be certain that any submissions will be accepted for filing and review by the FDA.
Regulators of other jurisdictions, such as the EMA and the PMDA, have their own procedures for
approval of drug candidates. Regulatory authorities in countries outside of the United States Europe
and Japan also have requirements for approval of drug candidates with which the Company must
comply prior to marketing in those countries. Obtaining regulatory approval for marketing of a drug
93
candidate in one country does not ensure that the Company will be able to obtain regulatory approval
in any other country. In addition, delays in approvals or rejections of marketing applications in the
United States, Europe, Japan or other countries may be based upon many factors, including regulatory
requests for additional analyses, reports, data, preclinical studies and clinical trials, regulatory
questions regarding different interpretations of data and results, changes in regulatory policy during
the period of drug development and the emergence of new information regarding the Company’s drug
candidates or other drug candidates. Also, regulatory approval for any of its drug candidates including
Imeglimin in Japan may be withdrawn.
On the date of this Universal Registration Document, the FDA, EMA and PMDA have not indicated that
their review process would be significantly delayed due to the COVID-19 outbreak. However, their
responsiveness may be impacted by the pandemic and delays in the obtention of certain
authorizations may occur in the near future.
The Company cannot predict whether its future trials will be successful or whether regulators will
agree with its conclusions regarding the preclinical studies and clinical trials the Company have
conducted to date and will conduct in the future.
2.2.1.3 The Company’s drug candidates may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties
that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, or, if approval is received, require such
drug candidates to be taken off the market, require them to include safety warnings or
otherwise limit their sales.
Undesirable side effects caused by the Company’s drug candidates could cause the Company or
regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label
or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the EMA, FDA, PMDA or other comparable authorities
in other jurisdictions. If severe side effects were to occur, or if any of the Company’s drug candidates
is shown to have other unexpected characteristics, the Company may need to either restrict its use of
such product to a smaller population or abandon development of such drug candidates.
In addition, the Company’s drug candidates are being developed as potential treatments for severe,
life-threatening diseases, including rare metabolic diseases, and, as a result, its trials will necessarily
be conducted in a patient population that will be more prone than the general population to exhibit
certain disease states or adverse events. For example, NASH and X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD)
patients may suffer from other co-morbidities, such as cardiovascular disease and obesity, that may
increase the likelihood of certain adverse events. As such, it may be difficult to discern whether certain
events or symptoms observed during such trials were due to the drug candidates or some other factor,
resulting in the Company and its development programs being negatively affected even if such events
or symptoms are ultimately determined to be unlikely related to its drug candidates.
If one or more of its drug candidates receives marketing approval, as Imeglimin in Japan, and the
Company or others later identify undesirable side effects caused by such drugs or negative interactions
with other products or treatments (including, for example, as a result of interactions with other
products once on the market : see Section 2.2.1.1.0 “The Company may develop its drug candidates in
combination with other therapies, which may delay or prohibit their marketability and exposes the
Company to additional risks"), a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result,
including:
regulatory authorities may withdraw approvals of such product;
regulatory authorities may require additional warnings on the product's label;
the Company may be required to create a medication guide outlining the risks of such side
effects for distribution to patients;
94
the Company could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients;
sales of the product may decrease significantly; and
its reputation may suffer.
Any of these events could prevent the Company from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of
the particular drug candidate, if approved, and could have a material adverse effect on its business,
prospects, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
2.2.1.4 Clinical failure can occur at any stage of clinical development. The results of earlier clinical
trials are not necessarily predictive of future results and any drug candidate the Company
advances through clinical trials may not have favorable results in later clinical trials.
Clinical failure can occur at any stage of the Company’s clinical development. Success in preclinical
studies and early clinical trials does not ensure that subsequent clinical trials will generate the same or
similar results. A number of companies in the pharmaceuticals industry, including those with greater
resources and experience than the Company, have suffered significant setbacks in Phase 2 and 3
clinical trials, even after seeing promising results in earlier clinical trials, and the Company could face
similar setbacks in relation to Imeglimin outside of Japan, PXL770 and/or PXL065. In some instances,
there can be significant variation in safety or efficacy results between different clinical trials of the
same drug candidate due to numerous factors, including changes in trial procedures set forth in
protocols, differences in the size and type of the patient populations, changes in and adherence to the
dosing regimen and other clinical trial protocols and the rate of dropout among clinical trial
participants. In particular, the Company’s drug candidate PXL065 for the treatment of NASH and
PXL065 and PXL770 for the treatment of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) are in relatively early
stages of clinical development and have not yet completed any Phase 2 clinical trials assessing its
efficacy. Moreover, data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities is subject to varying
interpretations, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Any such delays or failures
could negatively impact the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operation and
prospects.
2.2.1.5 The COVID-19 epidemic could have a significant impact on the Company’s activities
The progressive development of the COVID-19 pandemic on a global scale since the end of December
2019 has resulted in significant and evolving health threats in many countries, including countries in
which the Group’s clinical trials are planned or ongoing, such as France and the United States. COVID-
19 having been declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization (WHO) on March 12, 2020, the
Company has been regularly reviewing the impact of the outbreak on its business. Furthermore, the
outbreak of a novel strain of COVID-19, could adversely impact the Company’s business, including the
preclinical studies and clinical trials and the commercialization of any approved products.
Nonetheless, the eventual impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company will depend on future
developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
At this stage, the Company believes that the main risk factors that the Group could face in this context
are the following, it being specified this list is not exhaustive:
-
disruptions or interruptions of the Company’s preclinical and/or clinical trial activities, whether
conducted by the Company or in collaboration with its partners, due in particular to:
delays or difficulties in recruiting patients, limitations or redirection of human or
material resources normally allocated to these clinical trials. The only significant impacts
of COVID-19 on the Company as of the date of this Universal Registration Document was
a one-quarter delay in the initiation of a Phase 2 trial for PXL065 in order to ensure a
95
safe and stable environment for patient recruitment and the availability of clinical trial
sites during the COVID-19 outbreak, the absence of recruitment of patients by two
clinical sites which were selected for the Phase 2 trial on PXL065 in 2020 and certain
limited delays in the preparation of the Phase 2a clinical proof-of-concept (POC)
biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN);
delays in, or even lack of, the supply of drug substance or drug products and materials
necessary for the performance of clinical trials, or
travel restrictions imposed or recommended by local authorities;
-
-
reduced resources in the healthcare industries of the countries in which the Company will
conduct its clinical trials, as the resources might be diverted to fight the pandemic;
this could also result in delays in obtaining from regulatory authorities the approvals
required to launch the clinical trials contemplated by the Company, as well as delays in
the necessary interactions with local authorities or other important organizations and
third-party partners;
impact on the commercialization of Twymeeg® in Japan by the Company’s partner Sumitomo
Pharma as COVID-19 conditions could reduce the frequency of physician visits, render difficult
for patients to visit hospital practitioners to initiate new treatments such as Twymeeg® and
limit the significant market education efforts required for an innovative new product with a
new mechanism of action;
-
-
changes in local regulations due to the measures taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic,
which could require the Company to modify the conditions of its clinical trials, potentially
resulting in unforeseen costs or even the interruption of these trials, and could also lead to the
rejection of clinical data conducted in these territories;
reduced operational efficiency, including interruptions to the R&D activity, resulting from
challenges associated with remote work arrangements and limited resources available to
employees working remotely, as well as a potential decrease in Group employees’
engagement following short-time working measures or long periods of remote work during
lockdown periods; or
-
difficulties in accessing, in a timely manner or on acceptable terms, financing opportunities as
a result of dislocations in the capital markets, liquidity constraints on potential commercial
partners, and general disruptions to global and regional economies.
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, and based on publicly available information,
the Company has not identified the occurrence of any material negative effect on its business due to
the COVID-19 pandemic that remains unresolved other than the impact on the commercialization of
Twymeeg® in Japan by the Company’s partner Sumitomo Pharma. The Company will continue to
strongly monitor the impact of the pandemic on its business, prospects, financial condition, cash flows
or results of operations.
96
2.2.1.6 The Company is developing PXL065 and PXL770 for the treatment of NASH and X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) conditions for which no drugs have yet been commercialized
and for which there is little clinical experience. As a result, the Company’s development
approach involves new endpoints and methodologies. There is a risk that the outcome of
the Company’s clinical trials will not be favorable or that, even if favorable, regulatory
authorities may not find the results of such clinical trials to be sufficient for marketing
approval.
The Company is developing two of its drug candidates, PXL770 and PXL065, for the treatment of NASH
and X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), diseases for which there are currently no approved
treatments (see Section 2.1.8 “Competition”). As a result, the design and conduct of clinical trials for
these diseases and other indications the Company may pursue will be subject to increased risk.
The FDA and EMA generally require two pivotal clinical trials to approve an NDA or marketing approval
authorization. Furthermore, for full approval of an NDA or marketing approval authorization, the FDA
or EMA, respectively, requires a demonstration of efficacy based on a clinical benefit endpoint. The
FDA can grant accelerated approval for a new drug if it complies with the following criteria: (i) it treats
a serious condition; (ii) it provides a meaningful advantage over available therapies and (iii) it
demonstrates an effect on an endpoint reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit. In February and
April 2022, the FDA has granted Fast Track Designation (FTD) to PXL065 and PXL770, respectively, for
the treatment of patients with adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN), the most common form of X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD).
As there is no existing approved treatment of NASH or X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), there can
be no assurance that the endpoints and methodologies involved in the development of PXL770 and
PXL065 will be satisfactory and incidentally there can be no assurance that the outcome of the
Company’s clinical trials will be favorable or that, even if favorable, FDA, EMA, PMDA or other relevant.
regulatory authorities may not find the results of its clinical trials to be sufficient for marketing
approval.
2.2.1.7 Changes in regulatory requirements, guidance from regulatory authorities or unanticipated
events during clinical trials of the Company’s drug candidates could necessitate changes to
clinical trial protocols or additional clinical trial requirements, which would result in
increased costs to the Company and could delay its development timeline.
Changes in regulatory requirements, FDA guidance or guidance from the EMA, PMDA or other
regulatory authorities, or unanticipated events during its clinical trials, may force the Company to
amend clinical trial protocols. The regulatory authorities could also impose additional clinical trial
requirements. Amendments to the Company’s clinical trial protocols would require resubmission to
the EMA, FDA, PMDA, national clinical trial regulators and institutional review boards (“IRBs”), for
review and approval, which may adversely impact the cost, timing or successful completion of a clinical
trial. The Company intends to submit an NDA under Section 505(b)(2) for PXL065, a regulatory process
available to new drug candidates modifying a pharmaceutical product already approved by the FDA.
While this could allow the Company to conduct fewer preclinical or clinical studies and reduce
development costs, the FDA could reject its application and the Company would be subject to the
standard requirements for drug development. This could have a significant impact on its drug
candidate development program and plans. If the Company experiences delays completing, or if the
Company terminates, any of its clinical trials, or if the Company is required to conduct additional
clinical trials, the commercial prospects for its drug candidates may be harmed and its ability to
generate product revenue will be delayed.
97
2.2.1.8 The number of patients suffering from X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) that the
Company is targeting is small and has not been established with precision. If the actual
number of patients is smaller than the Company estimates, its revenue and ability to achieve
profitability may be materially adversely affected.
Due to the rarity of certain Company’s target indications, there is no comprehensive patient registry
or other method of establishing with precision the actual number of patients with X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) pathway deficiencies. As a result, the Company has had to rely on other
available sources to derive clinical prevalence estimates for its target indications.
The Company believes that the patient populations in the EU are at least as large as those in the United
States. However, the Company does not have comparable epidemiological data from the EU and these
estimates are therefore based solely on applying relative population percentages to the Company-
derived estimates described above.
Defining the exact treatment for X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) disorders is complex, so if any
approval that the Company obtains is based on a narrower definition of these patient populations than
the Company had anticipated, then the potential market for PXL065 or PXL770 for these indications
will be smaller than the Company originally believed. In either case, a smaller patient population in the
Company’s target indications would have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s ability to
achieve commercialization and generate revenues.
2.2.1.9 The Company may be unable to obtain certain specific disease designation for PXL065 or
PXL770 for the treatment of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD). In addition, specific
disease designation by the FDA and the EMA may not lead to a faster development,
regulatory review or approval process, and it does not increase the likelihood that PXL065
or PXL770 will receive additional marketing approvals in the United States or a marketing
authorization in the EU.
The FDA is authorized under the FDCA to give certain products “Breakthrough Therapy designation.”
A Breakthrough Therapy product candidate is defined as a product candidate that is intended, alone
or in combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or
condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that such product candidate may demonstrate
substantial improvement on one or more clinically significant endpoints over existing therapies. The
FDA will seek to ensure the sponsor of Breakthrough Therapy product candidate receives intensive
guidance on an efficient drug development program, intensive involvement of senior managers and
experienced staff on a proactive, collaborative and cross-disciplinary review. In addition, the FDA may
consider reviewing portions of an NDA before the sponsor submits the complete application or rolling
review. Product candidates designated as breakthrough therapies by the FDA may be eligible for other
expedited programs, such as priority review, if supported by clinical data.
Designation as Breakthrough Therapy is within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if the
Company believes PXL065 or PXL770 meet the criteria for designation as Breakthrough Therapy for
other uses, the FDA may disagree. In any event, the receipt of Breakthrough Therapy designation for a
product candidate, or acceptance for one or more of the FDA’s other expedited programs, may not
result in a faster development process, review or approval compared to products considered for
approval under conventional FDA procedures and does not guarantee ultimate approval by the FDA.
Regulatory standards to demonstrate safety and efficacy must still be met. Additionally, the FDA may
later decide that the product candidate no longer meets the conditions for designation and may
withdraw designation at any time or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not
be shortened.
The PRIME program was launched by the EMA in March 2016. PRIME is intended to enhance support
for the development of medicines that target an unmet medical need. This voluntary scheme is based
on enhanced interaction and early dialogue with developers of promising medicines, to optimize
development plans and speed up evaluation so these medicines can reach patients earlier. The PRIME
98
designation does not, however, guarantee that the regulatory review process in the EU will be shorter
or less demanding. Neither does the PRIME designation guarantee that the European Commission will
grant a marketing authorization for PXL065 or PXL770 in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD).
2.2.1.10 The Company may develop its drug candidates for use in combination with other therapies,
which may delay or prohibit their marketability and exposes it to additional risks.
Certain of the Company’s drug candidates are intended to be used in combination with certain other
products especially in NASH and diabetes. The Company undertakes studies to determine any risks
arising from the Company’s drug candidates' interaction with other products and treatments when
taken in combination. For example, combined use of Imeglimin and metformin may in the future show
additive toxicities notwithstanding its current belief of sufficient mechanistic differences between
these drugs. The same could apply to the combined use of Imeglimin and sitagliptin (see Section 2.1.6
“Imeglimin – the first type 2 diabetes treatment with the ambition of slowing disease course and its
complications” for more details on such combination) or PXL065 and PXL770 with other agents in
NASH. These studies, by their nature, cannot cover every possible combination. In addition, the
Company’s drug candidates may interact negatively with other products and treatments in certain
populations not covered by any of its studies. Further, such negative interactions may only arise once
its drug candidates, if approved, have been released to the market. Any such interactions may have
unacceptable or undetected side effects or reduce or negate the efficacy of its drug candidates, which
could reduce the marketability of its drug candidates, delay the development of its drug candidates
and, in turn, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition,
cash flows or results of operations.
2.2.2 Risks Related to the Company’s Financial Position and Need for Additional Capital
2.2.2.1 The Company will need to raise additional funding, which may not be available on acceptable
terms, or at all, and failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed may force the
Company to delay, limit or terminate its product development efforts or other operations.
The Company is currently advancing its drug candidates through clinical development and conducting
preclinical studies with respect to other programs. Developing drug candidates is expensive, lengthy
and risky, and the Company expects its research and development expenses to continue to be
significant in connection with its ongoing activities, particularly as the Company seeks to advance its
product candidates toward commercialization. If its clinical trials are successful and the Company
obtains regulatory approval for product candidates that the Company develops, to the extent the
Company pursues commercialization of its own products, as opposed to relying on third parties for
commercialization, the Company will likely incur commercialization expenses before these drug
candidates are marketed and sold.
The cash position of the Group as of December 31, 2021 amounts to € 32.3 million. Based on (i) this
cash position, (ii) the current development plan of the Group including the completion of its ongoing
Phase 2 NASH trial for PXL065 (DESTINY 1) but excluding the two identical Phase 2a clinical proof-of-
concept (POC) biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN) and (iii)
on the cash forecast for the year 2022 approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, that does
not include any net sales from Imeglimin in Japan as a conservative approach, the Group expects that
its resources will be sufficient to fund its operations and capital expenditure requirements through
December 31, 2022. However, the Group is subject to certain financial covenants related to its debt
with IPF Partners (see note 14.1) of the 2021 consolidated accounts, which could be potentially
breached in Q3 2022.
In addition, the Group does not expect that its resources will be sufficient to fund its operations and
capital expenditure requirements through at least 12 months from the date of this Universal
Registration Document. The Group is actively pursuing various financing options which would extend
its cash runway and avoid any breach of financial covenants through at least 12 months from the date
of this Universal Registration Document. These financing options include dilutive and non-dilutive
99
sources, as well as discussions with the Group’s lender, and the Group reasonably expects that at least
one of the pursued options would be completed before Q3 2022. As a consequence, the Group 2021
financials are presented on a going concern basis.
Until the Company can generate sufficient product or royalty revenue to finance its cash requirements,
which the Company may never do, the Company may seek additional financing in the form of public
or private equity or debt financings, government or other third-party funding, marketing and
distribution arrangements and other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements or
a combination of these sources. Any additional fundraising efforts may divert its management from
their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect its ability to develop and commercialize its drug
candidates. In addition, the Company cannot guarantee that future financing will be available in
sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. Specifically, in the context of the
COVID-19 outbreak and the recent geopolitical events in Ukraine and Russia, the Company anticipates
that such additional financing may be difficult to obtain in the near future. Moreover, the terms of any
financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of the Company’s shareholders and the
issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, by the Company, or the possibility of such
issuance, may cause the market price of its shares to decline. The sale of additional equity or
convertible securities would be dilutive to the Company's shareholders. The Company could also be
required to seek funds through arrangements with collaborators or otherwise at an earlier stage than
otherwise would be desirable and the Company may be required to relinquish rights to some of its
technologies or drug candidates or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to the Company. If the
Company is unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, the Company may be required to significantly
curtail, delay or discontinue one or more of its research or development programs or the
commercialization of any drug candidate or be unable to expand its operations or otherwise capitalize
on its business opportunities, as desired, which could impair its prospects.
2.2.2.2 The Company has generated very limited revenues from product sales to date and has also
accumulated losses since incorporation through December 31, 2021, of €179 million.
Currently, the Company has one product approved for commercial sale, Twymeeg® in Japan.
As a result, its ability to reduce losses and reach consistent profitability from product sales
is unproven, and the Company may never sustain profitability.
The Company is an international clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. Investment in product
development in the healthcare industry, including of biopharmaceutical products, is highly speculative
because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that any potential drug
candidate will fail to demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory
approval and/or become commercially viable. The Company has one product, Twymeeg® which has
been approved for commercial sale in Japan in June 2021 and has generated very limited revenue from
product sales to date. As of December 31, 2021, the Company had an accumulated fiscal loss of € 179
million.
The Company has devoted most of its financial resources to research and development, including its
clinical and preclinical development activities. Even if the Company has obtained a regulatory approval
to market Twymeeg® in Japan, its future revenues will depend on the successful commercialization of
Twymeeg® in Japan, and upon the size of any markets in which its drug candidates have received
approval and its ability to achieve sufficient market acceptance, reimbursement from third-party
payors and adequate market share for its drug candidates in those markets. There can be no assurance
that the Company will ever earn revenues sufficient to offset past, current and future losses or achieve
profitability, which would impair its ability to sustain its operations. Any inability to generate sustained
profits could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition,
cash flows or results of operations.
The Company also has to face certain contractual obligations and commitments (See Section 3.1.8 –
“Contractual Obligations and Commitments”).
100
The Company expects to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the
foreseeable future. The Company had net losses during the year ended December 31, 2021. The
Company does not anticipate achieving profitability in the future unless the Company obtains
regulatory approval for one or more product candidates and achieves sales of such products or linked
to the commercialization of Twymeeg® in Japan. The Company anticipates that its expenses will
continue to be significant if, and as, the Company:
continues the preclinical and clinical development of its drug candidates;
expands the scope of its current clinical trials for its drug candidates as the Company
announced in July 2021 its new strategic direction with increasing focus its pipeline on rare
metabolic diseases in addition to NASH;
begins new clinical trials for its drug candidates;
seeks other regulatory and marketing approvals for other of its drug candidates that
successfully complete clinical trials;
establishes a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize any drugs for
which the Company may obtain marketing approval for which the Company has not entered
into a collaboration with a third-party;
seeks to discover, identify and validate additional drug candidates;
acquires or in-license other drug candidates and technologies;
makes milestone, royalty or other payments under in-license or collaboration agreements;
maintains, protects and expands its intellectual property portfolio;
attracts new and retains existing skilled personnel; and
creates additional infrastructure to support its operations as a public company.
The net losses the Company incurs may fluctuate significantly from year to year, such that a period-to-
period comparison of its results of operations may not be a good indication of its future performance.
In any particular period or periods, its operating results could be below the expectations of securities
analysts or investors, which could cause the price of the shares to decline.
2.2.2.3 If the Company, its partner Sumitomo Pharma, or its potential future partners do not achieve
its product development or commercialization objectives in the timeframes the Company
expects, the Company may not receive product revenue, milestones or royalty payments and
the Company may not be able to conduct its operations as planned.
The Company has received and expects to continue to receive payments from its partner Sumitomo
Pharma under its Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement. For example, the Company is eligible to
receive escalating royalties of 8 - 18% on net sales of Twymeeg® and sales-based payments of up to
approximately EUR 200 million under its Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement. The Company
currently depends to a large degree on the payments from its existing partner in order to fund its
operations.
The Company cannot ensure that it will be able to enter into additional collaboration agreements that
also provide for milestone payments in the future. In addition, the milestone payments in these
collaboration agreements are generally dependent on the accomplishment of various scientific,
101
clinical, regulatory, sales and other product development objectives. The successful or timely
achievement of many of these milestones is outside of the Company’s control, in part because some
of these activities are being or will be conducted by its partners. If the Company or its partners fail to
achieve the applicable milestones, the Company will not receive such milestone payments. A failure to
receive any such milestone payment may cause the Company to:
delay, reduce or terminate certain research and development programs or otherwise find ways
to reduce short-term expenses that may not be in its long-term best interest;
raise funds through additional equity or convertible debt financings that could be dilutive to
its shareholders and holders of its ordinary shares;
obtain funds through collaboration agreements that may require the Company to assign rights
to technologies or products that the Company would have otherwise retained;
sign new collaboration or license agreements that may be less favorable than those the
Company would have obtained under different circumstances; and
consider strategic transactions or engaging in a joint venture with a third party.
Any potential royalty payments are also dependent on the successful product development and
commercialization of the Company’s drug candidates, which may never occur. The Company’s failure
to receive milestone or royalty payments and the occurrence of any of the events above may have a
material adverse impact on its business, prospects, financial conditions and results of operations.
2.2.2.4 The revenues generated from the Company’s collaboration and license agreement have
contributed and are expected to contribute a large portion of the Company’s revenue for the
foreseeable future.
The Company has entered into a partnership and license agreement for Imeglimin with Sumitomo
Pharma in respect of Japan, China and eleven other East and Southeast Asian countries
(the “Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement. The revenue recognized from the Sumitomo Pharma
License Agreement were €13.4 million and €6.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, and
2020 respectively (see Sections 2.3.2 “Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement" for more details on such
agreement).
The Company also enhances its research efforts by establishing collaborations with academic or non-
profit research institutions and other biopharmaceutical companies. The participation in these
collaborations may generate revenue and funding in the form of operating grants or the
reimbursement of research and development expenses.
The Company’s existing or future partners may not execute their obligations as planned or refuse to
honor their commitments under the collaboration and license agreements. The Company may not be
able to renew or maintain its license agreements or collaborative research contracts or may be unable
to sign new agreements with new collaborators on reasonable terms or at all. The non-performance
of partners, early termination of a contract such as the termination of the Roivant License Agreement
in January 2021, the non-renewal of a contract or the Company’s inability to find new or replacement
partners may negatively impact its revenues and research and development activities and funding
therefor. Should any of these risks materialize, this could have an adverse effect on the Company’s
business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
102
2.2.3 Risks Related to the Company’s Dependence on Third Parties
2.2.3.1 The Company has established a partnership agreement with Sumitomo Pharma for the
development and commercialization of Imeglimin, and the Company depends upon this
partner for the execution of its development and commercialization programs.
The Company’s development of Imeglimin in Japan, China and eleven other East and Southeast Asian
countries is entirely dependent upon the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement. Outside of the
territories covered by the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement, including the United States and
Europe, its development of Imeglimin is entirely dependent upon the Company’s ability to progress
alone or to enter into a broad collaboration agreement with a third party, which the Company does
not expect in the near term. (see Sections 2.3.22.3.2 “Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement" for more
details on such agreement). However due to the termination of the Roivant License Agreement on
January 31, 2021, the Company can no longer rely on Roivant for the development of Imeglimin.
Therefore, the Company cannot ensure that it will be able to find a viable path for such development
outside of the territories covered by the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement, including the United
States and Europe.
In the territories covered by the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement, the Company has limited
control over the amount and timing of resources that Sumitomo Pharma will dedicate to the
development and commercialization of Imeglimin. Following the announcement of the launch of the
commercialization of Twymeeg® in Japan, the Company’s ability to generate revenue from the
Sumitomo Pharma License agreement will depend on its partner' abilities to carry out the intended
plans. In addition, as it has occurred for the Roivant License Agreement in January 2021, Sumitomo
Pharma could have the right to abandon research or development projects and terminate its
collaboration agreements prior to or upon expiration of the terms. The Company’s current
collaboration involving the development and commercialization of Imeglimin pose a number of risks,
and the Company may enter into further partnership agreements with third parties for the
development and commercialization of its other drug candidates in the future, which may be subject
to the same or similar risks, including:
partners have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources that they will
apply to these partnerships and may not perform their obligations as expected;
partners may not pursue development and commercialization of the Company’s drug
candidates, or may elect not to continue or renew development or commercialization
programs, based on clinical trial results, changes in the collaborators' strategic focuses,
available funding or external factors that divert resources or create competing priorities;
partners may delay clinical trials, provide insufficient funding for a clinical program, stop a
clinical trial or abandon the Company’s drug candidates, repeat or conduct new clinical trials,
or require a new formulation of the Company’s drug candidates for clinical testing;
partners could independently develop, or develop with third parties, products that compete
directly or indirectly with the Company’s drug candidates;
disagreements with partners, including over: proprietary rights; contract interpretation; or the
preferred course of development, might cause: delays or termination of the research,
development or commercialization of the Company’s drug candidates; additional
responsibilities with respect to the Company’s drug candidates; or result in litigation or
arbitration, any of which could be time-consuming and expensive;
partners may not properly maintain or defend the Company’s intellectual property rights, or
may use its proprietary information in such a way as to invite litigation that could jeopardize
103
or invalidate its intellectual property or proprietary information, or expose the Company to
potential litigation;
collaborations may be terminated and, if terminated, may result in a need for additional capital
to pursue further development or commercialization of the Company’s drug candidates; and
if one of its partners is involved in a business combination, it could decide to delay, diminish
or terminate the development or commercialization of the Company’s drug candidates
licensed to it by us. Collaboration agreements might not result in highly performing
development or commercialization of the Company’s drug candidates or might simply not give
any results at all.
Regarding PXL065 more specifically, the Company acquired this program from DeuteRx in August 2018.
The Company's current development and clinical trial activities for PXL065 could be delayed,
suspended or interrupted if the quality or accuracy of data obtained by DeuteRx in the past is
compromised or challenged for any reason, especially if DeuteRx failed to comply with clinical
protocols or any regulatory requirements or failed to execute certain obligations under the agreement
signed with the Company, which could lead to expenses and delays impeding successful marketing of
PXL065 according to the planned timetable.
2.2.3.2 The late-stage development and marketing of the Company’s product candidates in NASH
and diabetes outside of Japan may partially depend on its ability to establish collaborations
with major biopharmaceutical companies.
In order to develop and market some of its product candidates in NASH or diabetes, the Company may
rely on collaboration, research and license agreements with pharmaceutical companies to assist in the
development of product candidates and the financing of their development. For Imeglimin, its most
advanced product, commercialized in Japan since September 2021, the Company has entered into an
agreement with Sumitomo Pharma, in part because of its late-stage development and marketing
capabilities.
As the Company continues to develop PXL770 and PXL065 in X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), in
addition to NASH, as well as identifying new product candidates, the Company will determine the
appropriate strategy for development and marketing, which may result in the need to establish
collaborations with major biopharmaceutical companies for such product candidates. The Company
may also enter into agreements with institutions and universities to participate in its other research
programs and to out license intellectual property rights.
The Company may fail to find collaboration partners and to sign new agreements for its other product
candidates and programs. The competition for partners is intense, and the negotiation process is time-
consuming and complex. Particularly, in the context of the COVID-19 outbreak, collaboration partners
may have other priorities in the near term which could impair the ability of the Company to sign new
agreements for its other product candidates and programs.
Any new collaboration may be on terms that are not optimal for the Company, and it may not be able
to maintain any new collaboration if, for example, development or approval of a product candidate is
delayed, sales of an approved product candidate do not meet expectations, or the collaborator
terminates the collaboration. Any such collaboration, or other strategic transaction, may require the
Company to incur non-recurring or other charges, increase its near- and long-term expenditures and
pose significant integration or implementation challenges or disrupt its management or business.
These transactions would entail numerous operational and financial risks, including exposure to
unknown liabilities, disruption of the Company’s business and diversion of its management's time and
attention in order to manage a collaboration or develop acquired products, product candidates or
technologies.
104
Accordingly, although there can be no assurance that the Company will undertake or successfully
complete any transactions of the nature described above, any transactions that the Company does
complete may be subject to the foregoing or other risks and have a material and adverse effect on its
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
Conversely, any failure to enter any additional collaboration or other strategic transaction that would
be beneficial to the Company could delay the development and potential commercialization of its
product candidates and have a negative impact on the competitiveness of any product candidate that
reaches market.
2.2.3.3 The Company relies upon a small number of third-party suppliers.
The Company currently relies, and expects to continue to rely, on a small number of third-party
suppliers for the supply of various raw materials and chemical products and clinical batches needed
for its preclinical studies and clinical trials, the execution of its preclinical studies and clinical trials and,
in the future, the production of its product candidates for which the Company obtains marketing
approval. For example, as of December 31, 2021, one supplier, a global leader in the field, accounted
for 28 % of the Company’s total purchases mainly in connection with the clinical development of
PXL065 in NASH. The Company may be unable to establish any additional agreements with third-party
suppliers or to do so on acceptable terms.
Even if the Company is able to establish agreements with third-party suppliers, reliance on third-party
suppliers entails additional risks, including:
reliance on the third party for regulatory compliance, quality assurance and safety;
the possible breach of the supply agreement by the third-party;
the possible termination or nonrenewal of the agreement by the third party at a time that is
costly or inconvenient for the Company; and
risks that such third parties are subject to cyber-attacks or similar events. For example, in 2020
several of the third-party suppliers the Company had relied on, in particular for the execution
of its preclinical studies and clinical trials, have been targeted by cyber-attacks. Due to their
internal organization and readiness, the consequences of such cyber-attacks did not lead to
any material consequences for the Company. However, the Company cannot exclude that
future cyber-attacks could have a material negative impact on the Company’s activities.
Third-party manufacturers may not be able to comply with current GMP, regulations or similar
regulatory requirements outside the United States. The Company’s failure, or the failure of its third-
party suppliers, to comply with applicable regulations could result in sanctions being imposed on the
Company, including fines, injunctions, civil penalties, delays, suspension or withdrawal of approvals,
license revocation, seizures or recalls of drug candidates, operating restrictions and criminal
prosecutions, any of which could significantly and adversely affect the duration, cost or continuation
of its clinical trials, which would, in turn, affect the eventual manufacturing and marketing of its drug
candidates, if approved, and harm its business and results of operations.
The Company aims to select its suppliers as carefully as possible to ensure the delivery of raw materials,
chemical products and clinical batches it needs. Although the Company generally selects several
suppliers for raw materials, a single supplier is usually relied on for the development of a production
process and the upscaling thereafter, due to financial and time constraints. The risk associated to a
delay or non-compliance in production of the clinical batches is integrated in the development
timelines of each drug-candidates of the Company. As of December 31, 2021, the Company is using
approximately 59 suppliers for its preclinical studies and clinical trials.
105
In the context of the COVID-19 outbreak, the Company anticipates that certain of its third-party
manufacturers may not be able to deliver the raw materials, chemical products and clinical batches it
needs within the agreed upon timelines. The Company is closely monitoring the situation with its
suppliers and will implement mitigation plans which may include the use of additional third-party
manufacturers as will be necessary.
Any performance failure on the part of the Company’s existing or future suppliers could delay clinical
development or marketing approval. If any one of its current suppliers cannot perform as agreed, the
Company may be required to replace that supplier. Although the Company believes that there are
several potential alternative suppliers who could supply the various raw materials and chemical
products and clinical batches needed for its preclinical studies and clinical trials, the Company may
incur added costs and delays in identifying and qualifying any such replacement.
Its current and anticipated future dependence upon others for the supply and manufacture of its drug
candidates may adversely affect the Company’s future profit margins and its ability to commercialize
any drug candidates that receive marketing approval on a timely and competitive basis.
2.2.4 Risks Related to the Commercialization of the Company’s Drug Candidates
2.2.4.1 Even if the Company successfully complete clinical trials of its drug candidates, those
candidates may not be commercialized successfully for other reasons.
Even if the Company successfully completes clinical trials for one or more of its drug candidates and
obtain relevant regulatory approvals or clearance, such as for Imeglimin in Japan in June 2021, those
candidates may not be commercialized for other reasons, including:
failing to receive regulatory clearances required to market them as drugs;
being subject to proprietary rights held by others;
failing to obtain clearance from regulatory authorities on the manufacturing of the Company’s
drug candidates;
being difficult or expensive to manufacture on a commercial scale;
having adverse side effects that make their use less desirable;
having negative interactions with other products or treatments;
failing to compete effectively with products or treatments commercialized by competitors; or
failing to show that the long-term benefits of the Company’s drug candidates exceed their
risks.
2.2.4.2 There are numerous competitors in the market for therapeutic treatments of metabolic
pathologies.
The biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries are highly competitive and subject to significant and
rapid technological change as researchers learn more about diseases and develop new technologies
and treatments. Numerous biopharmaceutical laboratories, biotechnology companies, institutions,
universities and other research entities are actively engaged in the discovery, research, development
and marketing of therapeutic responses to treat type 2 diabetes, NASH and X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) making it highly competitive fields. The Company’s competitors in the
NASH space include large pharmaceuticals, established and specialty biotech companies including, but
not limited to, Novartis AG, Pfizer Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Intercept
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Viking Therapeutics, Inc., Inventiva and Akero
Therapeutics. The Company’s competitors in the ALD space are primarily small biotech companies
106
including, but not limited to, Minoryx, Viking Therapeutics, Autobahn Therapeuitics, SwanBio. The
Company’s competitors in the type 2 diabetes space are primarily large pharmaceuticals companies
including, but not limited to, AstraZeneca PLC, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Eli Lilly & Co., Novo Nordisk A/S,
Johnson & Johnson, Boehringer, and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Significant competitive factors in
this industry include product efficacy and safety, quality and breadth of an organization's technology,
skill of an organization's employees and its ability to recruit and retain key employees, timing and scope
of regulatory approvals, government reimbursement rates for, and the average selling price of,
products, the availability of raw materials and qualified manufacturing capacity, manufacturing costs,
intellectual property and patent rights and their protection and sales and marketing capabilities. Given
the intense competition in its industry, the Company cannot assure you that any of the products that
the Company successfully develops will be clinically superior or scientifically preferable to products
developed or introduced by its competitors.
In addition, significant delays in the development of the Company’s drug candidates could allow its
competitors to succeed in obtaining EMA, FDA, PMDA or other regulatory approvals for their drug
candidates more rapidly than the Company, which could place it at a significant competitive
disadvantage or deny it marketing exclusivity rights.
Further, many of the organizations competing with the Company have significantly greater financial
resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical studies, conducting
clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing, especially regarding NASH and X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) treatments. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and
biotechnology industries may result in even more resources being concentrated among a smaller
number of the Company’s competitors. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be
significant competitors, particularly through partnership arrangements with large and established
companies. These companies also compete with the Company in recruiting and retaining qualified
scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for
clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, its programs.
In addition, a number of surgical and other alternative therapies to combat type 2 diabetes are being
researched and are in various stages of development, consisting essentially of metabolic surgery and
diabetic nephropathy. Should these therapies prove effective, it could reduce the potential size of the
market for the Company’s drug candidates.
The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a significant impact on the Company’s ability to
generate profits from its drug candidates, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on its
business, prospects, financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.
2.2.4.3 Government restrictions on pricing and reimbursement, as well as other healthcare payor
cost-containment initiatives, may negatively impact the Company’s ability to generate
revenues if it obtains regulatory approval to market a product.
The successful commercialization of Twymeeg® and any other of the Company’s drug candidates, if
approved, will depend in part on the extent to which coverage and adequate reimbursement for these
products will be available from third-party payors, including government authorities, such as Medicare
and Medicaid in the United States, private health insurers and health maintenance organizations.
These third-party payors determine which medications they will cover and establish reimbursement
levels. The Company cannot be sure that coverage and reimbursement will be available for any
potential drug candidate that it may commercialize and, if reimbursement is available, what the level
of reimbursement will be.
Assuming the Company obtains coverage for a given product by a third-party payor, the resulting
reimbursement payment rates may not be adequate or may require co-payments that patients find
unacceptably high. Patients who are prescribed medications for the treatment of their conditions, and
their prescribing physicians, generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the costs
associated with their prescription drugs. Patients are unlikely to use the Company’s drug candidates
107
unless coverage is provided, and reimbursement is adequate to cover all or a significant portion of the
cost of the Company’s drug candidates. Coverage and adequate reimbursement are critical to new
product acceptance.
Third-party payors are developing increasingly sophisticated methods of controlling healthcare costs,
such as by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications.
Increasingly, third-party payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with predetermined
discounts from list prices as a condition of coverage, are using restrictive formularies and preferred
drug lists to leverage greater discounts in competitive classes and are challenging the prices charged
for medical products. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time-consuming and
costly process that will require the Company to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of its
products to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will
be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance.
In some countries, the proposed pricing for a drug must be approved before it may be lawfully
marketed. In addition, in certain markets, the pricing of prescription drugs is subject to government
control and reimbursement may in some cases be unavailable. The requirements governing drug
pricing vary widely from country to country. For example, in Japan, almost all medical care is covered
by public health insurance. Drug prices are decided by governmental rules, enlisted into a drug price
list and then decreased year by year. Pharmaceutical companies cannot seek specific price adjustment.
Furthermore, the rules on drug pricing in Japan are becoming more and more restrictive for
pharmaceutical companies due to the increased financial burden for the country as a result of a rapidly
aging society.
National governments and health service providers have different priorities and approaches to the
delivery of health care and the pricing and reimbursement of products in that context. There can be
no assurance that any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations for
biopharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any of
the Company’s drug candidates.
2.2.4.4 The Company’s drug candidates may fail to achieve the degree of market acceptance by
physicians, patients, healthcare prescribers, third-party payors or the medical community
in general necessary for commercial success.
To date, the Company is commercializing Twymeeg® in Japan through its partner Sumitomo Pharma
for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, following its approval by the Japanese regulatory authorities for
marketing and sale in June 2021. Twymeeg ® or any other of the Company’s drug candidates may fail
to gain sufficient market acceptance by physicians, patients, healthcare prescribers, third-party payors
and others in the medical community. For example, Twymeeg® initial commercial uptake has been
impacted by prescribing restrictions for new products during the first year of sales and COVID-19
conditions. This has reduced the frequency of physician visits, rendered difficult for patients to visit
hospital practitioners to initiate new treatments such as Twymeeg® and limited the significant market
education efforts required for an innovative new product with a new mechanism of action.
Even if the medical community accepts a product as safe and efficacious for its indicated use,
physicians may choose to restrict the use of the product if the Company is unable to demonstrate that,
based on experience, clinical data, side-effect profiles and other factors, its product is preferable to
any existing products or treatments. Given that no products are currently approved for the treatment
of NASH or X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), the Company does not know the degree to which
PXL770 and PXL065 would be accepted as a therapy, if approved. Consequently, the Company cannot
predict the degree of market acceptance of any drug candidate that receives marketing approval,
especially for PXL770 and PXL065, which will depend on a number of factors, including, but not limited
to:
108
the demonstration of the clinical efficacy and safety of the product; and the perception of its
therapeutic benefit by prescribers and patients;
the approved labeling for the product and any required warnings;
the potential occurrence of unfavorable side-effects and interactions;
the product's ease of use, in particular in respect of its method of administration;
the advantages and disadvantages of the product compared to alternative treatments;
the Company’s ability to educate the medical community about the safety and effectiveness
of the product;
the market price of its product relative to competing treatments;
the availability of coverage and adequate reimbursement from governments and other third-
party payors pertaining to the product, and patients' willingness to pay out-of-pocket for cost
shares or the product if third-party payor reimbursement is limited or not available;
the effective implementation of a scientific publication strategy;
the support of opinion leaders in the field of type 2 diabetes, NASH and X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD); and
the development of one or more competing products for the same indication.
If one or more of the Company’s drug candidates, if approved, fails to be accepted by the market for
any of the reasons set forth above or for any other reason in one or more jurisdictions, this could
negatively affect the profitability and marketability of such drugs, which could, in turn, have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s business, prospects, financial condition, cash flows or results of
operations.
In addition, the marketing of the Company’s drug candidates, if approved may require the Company
to enter into new collaborations or partnerships agreements.
2.2.4.5 Any of the Company’s drug candidates for which the Company obtains marketing approval
could be subject to post-marketing restrictions or withdrawal from the market, and the
Company may be subject to substantial penalties if the Company fails to comply with
regulatory requirements or experiences unanticipated problems with its drugs following
approval.
Any of the drug candidates for which the Company obtains marketing approval, including Twymeeg®,
as well as the manufacturing processes, post-approval studies and measures, labeling, advertising and
promotional activities for such drugs, among other things, will be subject to continual requirements of
and review by the EMA, FDA, PMDA and other regulatory authorities. These requirements include
submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration and listing
requirements, requirements relating to manufacturing, quality control, quality assurance and
corresponding maintenance of records and documents, requirements regarding the distribution of
samples to physicians and recordkeeping. Even if marketing approval of a drug candidate is granted,
the approval may be subject to limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be
marketed or to the conditions of approval, including the FDA requirement to implement a Risk
Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”) to ensure that the benefits of a drug or biological product
109
outweigh its risks, or a drug candidate would be required to carry a warning in its labeling and on its
packaging. Drugs with boxed warnings are subject to more restrictive advertising regulations than
drugs without such warnings.
The EMA, FDA and PMDA may also impose requirements for costly post-marketing studies or clinical
trials and surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of a product, such as long-term observational
studies on natural exposure. The FDA and other agencies, including the Department of Justice, closely
regulate and monitor the post-approval marketing and promotion of products to ensure that they are
manufactured, marketed and distributed only for the approved indications and in accordance with the
provisions of the approved labeling. Violation of the FDCA and other statutes, including the False
Claims Act, relating to the promotion and advertising of prescription drugs may lead to investigations
or allegations of violations of federal and state health care fraud and abuse laws and state consumer
protection laws.
2.2.5 Risks Related to the Company’s Operations
2.2.5.1 The Company may change its organization, and as a result, the Company may encounter
difficulties in managing its workforce, which could disrupt its operations.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company had 54 full-time employees (on average). The Company may
experience significant changes in the number of its employees and the scope of its operations,
particularly in the areas of lead discovery and product development, regulatory affairs, clinical affairs
and manufacturing and, if any of its drug candidates other than Imeglimin in Japan, receives marketing
approval, in the areas of sales, marketing and distribution.
In order to manage its anticipated development, including the potential commercialization of its drug
candidates in Europe and the United States, the Company must continue to implement and improve
its managerial, operational and financial systems, maintain its facilities and continue to recruit and
train additional qualified personnel. Due to its limited financial resources and the limited experience
of its management team in managing a company with such expected changes, the Company may not
be able to effectively manage its operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The
change of its operations may lead to significant costs and may divert the attention of its management
and business development resources away from day-to-day activities and devote a substantial amount
of time to managing internal or external changes. Any inability to manage change could delay the
execution of the Company’s business plans or disrupt its operations. If the Company’s management is
unable to effectively manage its expected changes, its expenses may increase more than expected, its
ability to generate or increase its revenue could be reduced and the Company may not be able to
implement its business strategy. Its future financial performance and its ability to commercialize other
of its drug candidates, if approved, and compete effectively will depend, in part, on its ability to
effectively manage the future changes of the Company.
2.2.5.2 The Company’s internal computer systems, or those of its collaborators or other contractors
or consultants, may fail or suffer security breaches, which could result in a material
disruption of its product development programs and its business operations.
The Company’s internal computer systems and those of its current and any future collaborators and
other contractors or consultants are vulnerable to cyber-attacks, damage from computer viruses,
unauthorized access, natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and electrical failures.
If such an event were to occur and cause interruptions in the Company’s operations, it could result in
a material disruption of its development programs and its business operations, whether due to a loss
of its trade secrets or other proprietary information or other similar disruptions.
In the ordinary course of its business, the Company collects and store sensitive data, including, among
other things, legally protected patient health information, personally identifiable information about its
employees, intellectual property and proprietary business information. The Company manages and
maintain its applications and data utilizing on-site systems and outsourced vendors. These applications
110
and data encompass a wide variety of business-critical information, including research and
development information, commercial information and business and financial information. Because
information systems, networks and other technologies are critical to many of its operating activities,
shutdowns or service disruptions for the Company or vendors that provide information systems,
networks or other services to the Company pose increasing risks. Such disruptions may be caused by
events such as computer hacking, phishing attacks, ransomware, dissemination of computer viruses,
worms and other destructive or disruptive software, denial of service attacks and other malicious
activity, as well as power outages, natural disasters (including extreme weather), terrorist attacks or
other similar events. Such events could have an adverse impact on the Company and its business,
including loss of data and damage to equipment and data. In addition, system redundancy may be
ineffective or inadequate, and its disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient to cover all
eventualities. Significant events could result in a disruption of the Company’s operations, damage to
its reputation or a loss of revenues. In addition, the Company may not have adequate insurance
coverage to compensate for any losses associated with such events.
The Company could be subject to risks caused by misappropriation, misuse, leakage, falsification or
intentional or accidental release or loss of information maintained in the information systems and
networks of the Company and its vendors, including personal information of its employees and
patients, and company and vendor confidential data. In addition, outside parties may attempt to
penetrate its systems or those of its vendors or fraudulently induce its personnel or the personnel of
its vendors to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to its data and/or systems.
The Company may experience threats to its data and systems, including malicious codes and viruses,
phishing and other cyber-attacks. The number and complexity of these threats continue to increase
over time. If a material breach of its information technology systems or those of its vendors occurs,
the market perception of the effectiveness of its security measures could be harmed and its reputation
and credibility could be damaged. The Company could be required to expend significant amounts of
money and other resources to repair or replace information systems or networks.
The Company has implemented regular risk management processes (through the recruitment of
relevant employees) in order to mitigate any potential occurrence of risks related to data and systems.
The Company has also implemented new infrastructure solutions and IT applications in 2020 and 2021
and plans to continue to improve its IT infrastructure controls in the future.
In addition, the Company could be subject to regulatory actions and/or claims made by individuals and
groups in private litigation involving privacy issues related to data collection and use practices and
other data privacy laws and regulations, including claims for misuse or inappropriate disclosure of data,
as well as unfair or deceptive practices. Although the Company develops and maintains systems and
controls designed to prevent these events from occurring, and the Company has a process to identify
and mitigate threats, the development and maintenance of these systems, controls and processes is
costly and requires ongoing monitoring and updating as technologies change and efforts to overcome
security measures become increasingly sophisticated. Moreover, despite its efforts, the possibility of
these events occurring cannot be eliminated entirely.
As the Company outsources more of its information systems to vendors, engage in more electronic
transactions with payors and patients, and rely more on cloud-based information systems, the related
security risks will increase, and the Company will need to expend additional resources to protect its
technology and information systems. In addition, there can be no assurance that its internal
information technology systems or those of its third-party contractors, or its consultants' efforts to
implement adequate security and control measures, will be sufficient to protect the Company’s against
breakdowns, service disruption, data deterioration or loss in the event of a system malfunction, or
prevent data from being stolen or corrupted in the event of a cyber-attack, security breach, industrial
espionage attacks or insider threat attacks which could result in financial, legal, business or
reputational harm. In 2020, several of the vendors the Company has relied on, in particular for the
111
execution of its preclinical studies and clinical trials, have been targeted by cyber-attacks. Due to their
internal organization and readiness, the consequences of such cyber-attacks did not lead to any
material consequences for the Company. However, the Company cannot exclude that future cyber-
attacks could have a material negative impact on the Company’s activities. Since 2021, the Company
has implemented a cyber-security insurance to protect itself against the consequences of potential
cyber-attacks.
The Company may be exposed to significant foreign exchange risk. Exchange rate fluctuations may
adversely affect the foreign currency value of its ordinary shares.
The Company incurs some of its expenses, and expects to receive certain future revenues, in currencies
other than euro. The Company has also received, and expects to continue to receive, payments from
its partner Sumitomo Pharma, under its partnership agreement in currencies other than euro, in
particular in the context of the commercialization of Twymeeg® in Japan. As the Company expands
into new markets and its drug candidates approach advanced clinical trials and marketability, it is likely
that non-euro-denominated arrangements will increase in number and value. In particular, as the
Company expands its operations and conducts clinical trials in the United States, the Company will
incur expenses in U.S. dollars. As a result, the Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange risk
as its results of operations and cash flows are subject to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates.
The Company has significant financial cash flows in Japanese yen and U.S. dollar. As a consequence,
the Company is exposed to Japanese yen and U.S. dollar exchange rate.
As it relates to Japanese Yen, the Company was exposed to foreign exchange risk taking into account
the volume of transactions that it carried out in yen in 2020 and 2021 in the framework of the co-
development agreement signed with Sumitomo Pharma. However, it covered this risk in application of
the principle provided in the contract, according to which the Group re-bills Sumitomo Pharma in the
same currency as that, in which it has been charged for its purchases.
The Company has implemented forward purchases of U.S. dollars and forward sales of Japanese Yens
to limit the foreign exchange risk. As a result, the exchange expenses & sources of income reported in
the Company’s audited financial statements in 2020 and as of December 31, 2021, include non-cash
expenses / sources of income that consist in accounting entries that takes into account the year-end
reevaluation of deposit in Dollar and Japanese Yen.
From December 31, 2021, going forward, the Company will continue to be exposed in U.S. dollar and
may continue implementing forward purchases to limit the foreign exchange risk. As it relates to
Japanese yen, the Company may implement forward sales agreements to limit the foreign exchange
risk from revenue.
A 1% increase in the EUR/JPY exchange rate will result in a decrease in revenue of EUR 134,000 (out of
EUR 13,518,504). An increase of 1% in the EUR/USD exchange rate would have no revenue impact.
As of December 31, 2021, the Company has trade payables in U.S. dollar for USD $1.6 M.
Notwithstanding forward sale or purchase agreements that the Company may implement, an increase
in the value of euro against the Japanese yen could have a negative impact on its revenue and earnings
growth as Japanese yen revenue and earnings, if any, would be translated into euros at a reduced
value. Likewise, a decrease in the value of euro against the U.S. dollar could have a negative impact on
its operating expenses incurred in U.S. dollar. The Company cannot predict the impact of foreign
currency fluctuations, and foreign currency fluctuations in the future may adversely affect its financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows.
112
2.2.6 Risks Related to the Company’s Intellectual Property
2.2.6.1 The Company’s ability to compete may decline if the Company is unable to or does not
adequately protect its intellectual property rights or if its intellectual property rights are
inadequate for its technology and drug candidates.
The Company’s commercial success and viability depends on its ability to obtain and maintain patent
protection in the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries with respect to drug candidates
owned by or licensed to the Company, as well as to successfully defend these rights against third-party
challenges. The Company’s strategy and future prospects are based, in particular, on its patent
portfolio, including those relating to Imeglimin, PXL770 and PXL065. The Company has acquired all the
patents related to the development of Imeglimin (see Section 2.3“Merck Serono agreement”) and
owns all the patents related to the development of PXL065 and PXL770.
The Company will only be able to protect its drug candidates and their uses from unauthorized use by
third parties to the extent that valid and enforceable patents, or effectively protected trade secrets,
cover them. Also, intellectual property rights have limitations and do not necessarily address all
potential threats to the Company’s competitive advantage. Its ability to obtain patent protection for
its drug candidates is uncertain and the degree of future protection afforded by its intellectual property
rights is uncertain due to a number of factors, including, but not limited to:
the Company or its licensor may not have been the first to make the inventions covered by
pending patent applications or issued patents;
the Company or its licensor may not have been the first to file patent applications for the
Company’s drug candidates or the compositions the Company developed or for their uses;
others may independently develop identical, similar or alternative products or compositions
and uses thereof;
the Company’s or its licensors' disclosures in patent applications may not be sufficient to meet
the statutory requirements for patentability;
any or all of the Company’s or its licensors' pending patent applications may not result in issued
patents;
the Company or its licensor may not seek or obtain patent protection in countries that may
eventually provide the Company a significant business opportunity;
any patents issued to the Company or its licensor may not provide a basis for commercially
viable products, may not provide any competitive advantages, or may be successfully
challenged by third parties;
the Company’s or its licensors' compositions and methods may not be patentable;
others may design around its patent claims to produce competitive products which fall outside
of the scope of the Company’s patents;
others may identify prior art or other bases which could invalidate the Company’s or its
licensors’ patents;
its competitors might conduct research and development activities in the United States and
other countries that provide a safe harbor from patent infringement claims for certain
113
research and development activities, as well as in countries where the Company does not have
patent rights, and then use the information learned from such activities to develop
competitive products for sale in its major commercial markets; or
the Company may not develop additional proprietary technologies that are patentable.
Even if the Company has or obtains patents covering its drug candidates or compositions, the Company
may still be barred from making, using and selling its drug candidates or technologies because of the
patent rights of others. Others may have filed, and in the future may file, patent applications covering
compositions or products that are similar or identical to those of the Company. There are many issued
patents relating to therapeutic drugs, and some of these relate to compounds the Company intends
to commercialize. Numerous issued patents and pending patent applications owned by others exist in
the type 2 diabetes, NASH and X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) fields in which the Company is
developing drug candidates. These could materially affect the Company’s ability to develop its drug
candidates or sell its drug candidates, if approved. Because patent applications can take many years to
issue, there may be currently pending applications unknown to the Company that may later result in
issued patents that its drug candidates or compositions may infringe. These patent applications may
have priority over patent applications filed by the Company.
Obtaining and maintaining a patent portfolio entails significant expense and resources. Part of the
expense includes periodic maintenance fees, renewal fees, annuity fees, various other governmental
fees on patents or applications due in several stages over the lifetime of patents or applications, as
well as the cost associated with complying with numerous procedural provisions during the patent
application process. The Company may not choose to pursue or maintain protection for particular
inventions. In addition, there are situations in which failure to make certain payments or
noncompliance with certain requirements in the patent process can result in abandonment or lapse of
a patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant
jurisdiction. If the Company chooses to forgo patent protection or allow a patent application or patent
to lapse purposefully or inadvertently, its competitive position could suffer.
In January 2021, one patent related to the composition of matter of Imeglimin useful for the treatment
of diabetes has expired. In 2021, further to a strategic review of its intellectual property portfolio, the
Company also made the strategic decision to abandon certain of its existing patents (see Section 2.1.7
Intellectual Property”). As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, there is no patent in
the Company’s portfolio which (a) is due to expire within the next five (5) years or (b) could not be
extended in the short term and whose expiration would significantly impact the business of the
Company. Legal actions to enforce the Company’s patent rights can be expensive and may involve the
diversion of significant management time. In addition, these legal actions could be unsuccessful and
could also result in the invalidation of its patents or a finding that they are unenforceable. The
Company may or may not choose to pursue litigation or other actions against those that have infringed
on its patents, or used them without authorization, due to the associated expense and time
commitment of monitoring these activities. If the Company fails to protect or to enforce its intellectual
property rights successfully, its competitive position could suffer, which could harm its results of
operations.
2.2.6.2 Patent terms may be inadequate to protect the Company’s competitive position on its drugs
for an adequate amount of time, and the Company may seek to rely, but may not be able to
rely, on other forms of protection, such as regulatory specificity.
Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new drug
candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before or shortly after such candidates
are commercialized. The Company carries out an internal as well as an external (through outside
counsels) monitoring of (i) its patents and (ii) the potential competitor patents which may be filed. The
IP strategy of the Company is also assessed in order to protect itself from any potential counterfeiting.
114
The Company expects to seek extensions of patent terms in the United States and, if available, in other
countries where the Company is prosecuting patents, including Japan. In the United States, the Drug
Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984 permits a patent term extension of up to
five years beyond the normal expiration of the patent, which is limited to the approved indication (or
any additional indications approved during the period of extension). Article 67(2) of the Japanese
Patent Act includes similar provisions, except that several patents may be extended based on the same
marketing authorization and that a single patent may be extended several times based on successive
marketing authorizations for different indications. However, the applicable authorities, including the
FDA and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the ”USPTO”), in the United States, and any equivalent
regulatory authority in other countries, including Japan, may not agree with its assessment of whether
such extensions are available, and may refuse to grant extensions to the Company’s patents, or may
grant more limited extensions than the Company requests. The Company may also seek to rely on
other forms of protection, such as regulatory specificity.
Through such specificity, beyond patent protection, the Company can also rely on regulatory data
exclusivity and corresponding market protection which enable holders of marketing authorizations
granted within the EU, in the US or in Japan, to benefit from a market exclusivity period from the date
of its first marketing authorization.
However, there can be no assurance that such other forms of protection will be available or sufficient.
2.2.6.3 The Company will not seek to protect its intellectual property rights in all jurisdictions
throughout the world and the Company may not be able to adequately enforce its
intellectual property rights even in the jurisdictions where the Company seeks protection.
The development of PXL770 and PXL065 are currently running in the United States, through the
505(b)(2) regulatory pathway for the latter (see Section 2.1.4 “PXL770 and PXL065 - Two Novel Drug-
Candidates to treat patients with NASH”) and in Europe.
Consequently, filing, prosecuting and defending patents on the Company’s drug candidates in all
countries and jurisdictions throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive. Competitors may
use its technologies in jurisdictions where the Company does not pursue and obtain patent protection
to develop their own products and further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories
where the Company has patent protection. These products may compete with the Company’s drug
candidates and its patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to
prevent them from competing. Even if the Company pursues and obtains issued patents in particular
jurisdictions, its patent claims or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to
prevent third parties from so competing.
Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual
property rights in certain foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of some countries, particularly
developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents and other intellectual property
protection, especially those relating to biopharmaceuticals or biotechnologies. This could make it
difficult for the Company to stop the infringement of its patents, if obtained, or the misappropriation
of its other intellectual property rights. For example, many foreign countries have compulsory licensing
laws under which a patent owner must grant licenses to third parties. In addition, many countries limit
the enforceability of patents against third parties, including government agencies or government
contractors. In these countries, patents may provide limited or no benefit. Patent protection must
ultimately be sought on a country-by-country basis, which is an expensive and time-consuming process
with uncertain outcomes. Accordingly, the Company may choose not to seek patent protection in
certain countries, and the Company will not have the benefit of patent protection in such countries.
Proceedings to enforce the Company’s patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial
costs and divert the Company’s efforts and attention from other aspects of its business, put its patents
at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly, put its patent applications at risk of not being
issued and provoke third parties to assert claims against the Company. The Company may not prevail
115
in any lawsuits that the Company initiates, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may
not be commercially meaningful. In addition, changes in the law and legal decisions by courts in the
countries where the Company develops its drug candidates may affect the Company’s ability to obtain
adequate protection for its technology and the enforcement of intellectual property. Accordingly, its
efforts to enforce its intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a
significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that the Company develops or
licenses.
2.2.7 Risks Related to Legal and Compliance Matters
2.2.7.1 Failure to comply with European restrictive regulations governing the collection, use,
processing and cross-border transfer of personal information may result in substantial
penalties
The Company may collect, process, use or transfer personal information from individuals located in
the European Union in connection with its business, including in connection with conducting clinical
trials in the European Union.
Strict requirements on controllers and processors of personal data, including special protections for
"sensitive information" which includes health and genetic information of data subjects residing in the
EU are imposed by the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation ((EU) 2016/679), or the
GDPR.
More specifically, this legislation imposes requirements relating to (i) having legal bases for processing
personal information relating to identifiable individuals and (ii) to ensuring the transfer of such
information outside of the European Economic Area, or EEA, including to the United States or other
regions that have not been deemed to offer "adequate" privacy protections, providing details to those
individuals regarding the processing of their personal information, keeping personal information
secure, having data processing agreements with third parties who process personal information,
responding to individuals’ requests to exercise their rights in respect of their personal information,
reporting security breaches involving personal data to the competent national data protection
authority and affected individuals, appointing data protection officers, conducting data protection
impact assessments and record-keeping.
The GDPR imposes additional obligations and liabilities in relation to personal data that the Company
processes and the Company may be required to put in place additional mechanisms ensuring
compliance with the new data protection rules. Failure to comply with the requirements of the GDPR
and related national data protection laws of the member states of the European Union may result in
substantial fines of up to 4% of worldwide annual revenues, or €20,000,000, other administrative
penalties, criminal sanctions and civil claims being brought against the Company, which could have a
material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
2.2.7.2 The Company is subject to healthcare laws and regulations which may require substantial
compliance efforts and could expose the Company to criminal sanctions, civil penalties,
contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished profits and future earnings, among
other penalties.
Healthcare providers, physicians and others will play a primary role in the recommendation and
prescription of the Company’s drug candidates, if approved. The Company’s arrangements with such
persons and third-party payors and its operations will expose the Company to broadly applicable anti-
bribery, fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, that may constrain the business
or financial arrangements and relationships through which the Company researches, markets, sells and
distributes its products, if it obtains marketing approval.
More specifically, the development of therapeutic products for human use is heavily regulated and
therefore involves significant interaction with public officials which is likely to cause a risk of corruption
or bribery. For instance, in many countries, hospitals are operated by the government, and doctors
116
and other hospital employees are considered foreign officials. Certain payments to hospitals in
connection with clinical trials and other work have been deemed to be improper payments to
government officials and have led to enforcement actions. That is why business activity may be subject
to anti-bribery or anticorruption laws, regulations or rules of other countries in which the Company
operates, including without limitation the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the U.K. Bribery Act
(UKBA) or the French “Sapin 2” Law n°2016-1691. The implementation of these statutes may also
impose to develop internal compliance programs, procedures and guidelines to detect and report any
suspicious activities and to mitigate any risks of noncompliance which may occur.
In addition, the Company may be subject to specific French and foreign healthcare laws and
regulations. For instance anti-kickback and false claims laws, such as the French “Bertrand Law”,
French Ordinance n°2017-49 of 19 January 2017, the “French Sunshine Act”, and analogous state or
foreign laws and regulations, such as U.S. federal transparency requirements under the Physician
Payments Sunshine Act, that require applicable manufacturers of covered drugs to track and report
the agreements, payments and other transfers of value provided to physicians, and certain ownership
and investment interests held by physicians or their immediate family members.
Ensuring that the Company’s business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable
healthcare laws and regulations will likely be costly. If its operations were found to be in violation of
any of these laws or any other governmental regulations, the Company may be subject to significant
civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, possible
exclusion from government funded healthcare programs, additional reporting requirements and
oversight if it becomes subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve
allegations of non-compliance with these laws, contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished
profits and future earnings, and curtailment of the Company’s operations, any of which could
substantially disrupt the Company’s operations.
117
2.3
Material contracts
Except for the agreements described below, the Company has only entered into agreements in the
normal course of business.
2.3.1 Merck Serono agreement
On March 19, 2009, the Company entered into an assignment and licensing agreement with Merck
Serono, as amended to date, (the “MS Agreement”), as part of Merck Serono's spin-off of its research
and development activities in the cardiometabolic field. Under the MS Agreement, Merck Serono paid
the Company a non-refundable upfront amount of €7.2 million to support the Company’s research and
development activities and reflect Merck Serono's economic interest in its development.
Under the terms of the MS Agreement, the Company acquired certain patents from Merck Serono (the
Assigned Patents”). The Company was also granted a non-exclusive, worldwide right and license to
specified patents (the “Licensed Patents”), as well as know-how to research and develop
pharmaceutical products using the patents assigned and licensed to the Company by Merck Serono.
Pursuant to the MS Agreement, the Company had an option to convert the license to an exclusive,
worldwide right and license in respect of 25 drug candidates, per research program, such drug
candidates to be selected by the Company. The Company partially exercised this option on July 23,
2009.
On February 13, 2018, the Company exercised its option to require Merck Serono to assign the full and
complete ownership of the key Imeglimin patents over which it had an exclusive worldwide license.
The Company entered into a patent assignment agreement with Merck Serono on April 25, 2018 to
reflect this assignment. The expected expiration date of the last to expire patents under the MS
Agreement covering the Company’s Imeglimin program is 2029 and covering certain AMPK activator
compounds, other than PXL770, is 2029. For further information in relation to the Company’s patent
portfolio, see Section 2.1.7 "Intellectual Property".
The Company benefited from a license to Merck Serono’s rights over five families of patents for
innovative structures serving as AMPK activators as well as four other programs involving the
treatment of diabetes: GLP-1 agonists, FxR agonists, 11-beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type-
Page 120 1 (11bHSD1) inhibitors and glucokinase activators. The stages of advancement of issuance of
these patents vary by country. None of these patents relate to any of the main drug candidates
developed by the Company (e.g. Imeglimin, PXL770 and PXL065), for which the Company fully owns all
patents related to such drug candidates.
Merck Serono is entitled to the following compensation:
royalties on net sales of the products covered by the Assigned or Licensed patents at a fixed
8% rate for Imeglimin and a low single digit rate for other products covered by the assigned or
Licensed patents; and
an additional percentage of certain revenue from any partnering agreement relating to the
drug candidates covered by the Assigned or Licensed patents, at a low double-digit rate for
Imeglimin. For other compounds, if the Company enters into a partnering agreement, a
percentage ranging from low double-digits to high double-digits of certain partnering revenues
with respect to products covered by the Assigned or Licensed patents depending on the
product and its stage of development when it is partnered would be owed to Merck Serono.
1,088,531 ordinary shares were issued to Merck Serono on May 23, 2014, in connection with its waiver
of certain rights under the MS Agreement that were triggered by the Company’s initial public offering
on Euronext Paris. Merck Serono has sold its entire stake in transactions on the open market and to
the Company’s knowledge at the date of this Universal Registration Document does not own any
ordinary shares.
118
The term of the MS Agreement continues on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis until
the later of: (i) the final expiration date of any patent right relating to the Company’s pharmaceutical
products that contain or comprise substances covered by the Licensed Patents in such country; or (ii)
ten years from the first sale for monetary value for use or consumption by the general public of such
pharmaceutical product in such country following regulatory approval for such product in such
country. Thereafter, the Company will have a fully paid up, irrevocable and exclusive license with
respect to the products.
Either party may terminate the MS Agreement if the other party breaches a material provision (and
such breach is not cured) or if the other party or its affiliates becomes insolvent or bankrupt.
Such termination would not have any impact on the ownership of the assigned patents (including all
the Imeglimin patents which have been effectively assigned on April 25, 2018). However, it would
impact the Licensed Patents, which are not related to any of the main drug candidates developed by
the Company, as the underlying licenses would then be terminated as well.
In addition, the Company was involved in an arbitration with Merck Serono. See Section 2.1.112.1.11
"Legal Proceedings".
2.3.2 SUMITOMO PHARMA License Agreement
On October 30, 2017, the Company entered into the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement, for the
co-development and marketing of Imeglimin.
Under this agreement, Sumitomo Pharma has an exclusive, royalty-bearing license, with the right to
grant sublicenses, to develop, manufacture, use, import and register any medicinal products
containing Imeglimin and its salt, (the “Licensed Product”), solely for the purpose of commercializing
the Licensed Product in Japan, China and eleven other countries in Southeast Asia, for all human and
veterinary indications, including type 2 diabetes.
The Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement also grants Sumitomo Pharma an exclusive, royalty-free
license (with the right to grant sublicenses) under the Company’s trademarks that have been registered
for commercializing the Licensed Product in the designated territory in East and Southeast Asia for all
uses related to developing, manufacturing and commercializing Licensed Product in such territory. The
expected expiration date of the last to expire patents under the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement
is 2036. For further information in relation to the Company’s patent portfolio, see Section 2.1.7
"Intellectual Property".
Sumitomo Pharma is permitted under the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement to develop the
Licensed Product for the purpose of commercializing it within the designated territory35. Both parties
have jointly developed Licensed Product through Phase 3 clinical trials and obtained the approval to
market the Licensed Product in Japan on June 23, 2021.
Under the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement, Sumitomo Pharma is responsible for regulatory
activities concerning the development, manufacturing and commercialization of the Licensed Product
in the designated territory and will be the holder of all regulatory approvals issued by relevant
regulatory authorities.
Upon signing the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement, Sumitomo Pharma made an initial non-
refundable payment to the Company in an amount of ¥4.750 million (approximately EUR 36 million).
Following the submission of the Imeglimin J-NDA in July 2020, the Company received a ¥500 million
(EUR 4.1 million) milestone payment from Sumitomo Pharma. On June 23, 2021, the Company received
the TWYMEEG approval in Japan which triggered a ¥1.75 billion (EUR 13.2 million) milestone payment
to Poxel from Sumitomo Pharma.
35 : Designated territory includes 13 countries: Japan, China, South Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand,
Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore, Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos.
119
The Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement also provides for a future potential regulatory milestone
payment related to the marketing approval of Imeglimin in China. Sumitomo Pharma will also pay the
Company sales-based payments depending on net sales thresholds up to an aggregate amount of ¥26.5
billion (approximately EUR 200 million), as well as escalating royalties of 8-18% on net sales of
TWYMEEG.
In accordance with the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement, the royalty rates have been reduced to
8-18%, from the low double digits to the low twenties initially expected, in connection with the final
price of TWYMEEG as determined by the national health insurance drug price in Japan. The royalty rate
may be further reduced in certain circumstances relating to the expiry of certain licensed patents,
generic competition, third-party license payments. Royalties due under the Sumitomo Pharma License
Agreement will not, however, be reduced below the royalty rate the Company is obliged to pay to
Merck Serono under the MS Agreement.
The Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement will expire on a country-by-country basis upon expiry of the
later of: (i) the exclusive period in such country (meaning the period beginning on the first commercial
sale of the Licensed Product in the relevant country until the latest of (x) a valid claim covering the
Licensed Product in such country, and (y) any regulatory exclusivity for the Licensed Product in such
country); or (ii) ten years from the first commercial sale of the Licensed Product in such country.
The Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement as a whole will expire on the date upon which the Sumitomo
Pharma License Agreement terminates with respect to the last country in the designated territory.
Thereafter, Sumitomo Pharma will have a fully paid up, perpetual and exclusive license with respect to
the Licensed Products in the designated territory.
Either party may terminate the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement if the other party materially
breaches the terms and conditions of the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement and such breach is
not remedied or if the other party becomes insolvent, is declared bankrupt, ceases business or is
subject to any procedure for similar effect under applicable laws. Sumitomo Pharma may also
terminate the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement on a country-by-country basis or in its entirety,
upon 180 days' written notice to the Company.
2.3.3 DeuteRx Agreement
On August 29, 2018, the Company entered into a strategic collaboration and acquisition agreement
with DeuteRx (the “DeuteRx Agreement”), with respect to DRX-065 (now PXL065) and a portfolio of
other potential deuterated drug-candidates for the treatment of rare and specialty metabolic diseases
(although the Company owns the patents and have the rights with respect to all indications for PXL065
and this portfolio), which the Company refers to as the “PXL065 Products”. Pursuant to the DeuteRx
Agreement, DeuteRx sold, transferred and assigned to the Company all industrial and intellectual
property rights and interests in DeuteRx's know-how and patent rights useful for the development,
manufacture or commercialization of the PXL065 Products.
Under the DeuteRx Agreement, the Company is responsible for, and control the development and
commercialization of, the PXL065 Products.
As consideration under the DeuteRx Agreement, the Company paid DeuteRx a non-refundable upfront
payment of €6.8 million and issued 1,290,000 new ordinary shares to DeuteRx.
Under the DeuteRx Agreement, the Company is also obliged to pay DeuteRx, in cash or in shares
(valued based on a daily volume weighted average of actual trading prices for a specified period), as
the case may be, amounts tied to attaining certain development and regulatory objectives for products
under the acquired programs, such as the completion of certain phases of clinical study and the receipt
of marketing approvals in various countries. The Company is further required to make cash payments
to DeuteRx linked to sales targets and low single-digit royalty payments based on net sales (subject to
reduction in certain circumstances).
120
The term of the DeuteRx Agreement will last until the Company has satisfied its clinical milestone, sales
milestone and royalty-based payment obligations. Royalty-based payments continue until equivalent
products to the product being sold become generally available in the subject country from third-party
sellers. The Company may terminate the agreement at any point with notice to DeuteRx. In the event
that DeuteRx commits and does not cure a material breach of the DeuteRx Agreement, the Company
is entitled to reduce payments owed to DeuteRx under the DeuteRx Agreement.
121
2.4
Organizational structure and employees
2.4.1 Organizational structure
2.4.1.1 Legal organization chart
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, the Company holds 100% of its two subsidiaries:
Poxel Japan and Poxel Inc.
2.4.1.2 Group Companies
POXEL S.A.: Parent company of the Group, based in Lyon, France (Department 69).
POXEL JAPAN KK: incorporated in March 2018 and domiciled in Tokyo, Japan, a wholly owned
subsidiary of Poxel, engaged in research and development activity.
POXEL INC: incorporated in January 2019 and domiciled in Burlington (Massachusetts), USA, a wholly
owned subsidiary of Poxel, engaged in research and development activity.
2.4.1.3 Group financial flows
The Group has implemented agreements related to the organization of financial flows and the
movement of products within the Group, in line with the following structure:
Charging back of intercompany services: an intra-group agreement was signed between the
Company Poxel Japan KK and Poxel Inc., concerning reciprocal service provision between the
Company (research, corporate and management services) Poxel Japan KK and Poxel Inc.
(research, corporate and administrative services).
Financial flows: a cash facility agreement was signed between the Company, Poxel Japan KK
and Poxel Inc., to determine the conditions governing cash advances made by the Company to
its subsidiary.
As of December 31, 2021, €166,259 was invoiced by the Company to Poxel Japan KK in 2021 for
chargebacks on services or for interest on current account advances.
As of December 31, 2021, JPY 120,393,070was invoiced by Poxel Japan KK to the Company in 2021 for
research and management services.
As of December 31, 2021, €202,579 was invoiced by the Company to Poxel Inc. in 2021 for chargebacks
on services or for interest on current account advances.
As of December 31, 2021, $2,568,536 was invoiced by Poxel Inc. to the Company in 2021 for corporate
and management services.
122
2.4.2 Employees
2.4.2.1 Number of employees and breakdown by function
2.4.2.1.1 Organizational Structure
Chief Executive
Officer
Executive Assistant
Science, Innovation
& scientific
Communication
PMO, Non Clinical
Development &
Manufacturing
Clinical
Development &
Regulatory Affairs
Clinical
Development &
Regulatory Affairs
Business
Development & US
Operations
Finance &
Administration
Legal & Corporate
Social Responsibility
Human Resources
Quality
R&D Pharmacology
& scientific
IR & PR
Communication
Mgt Team
France
US
Japan
The workforce totaled 56 people as of December 31, 2021 as compared to 53 employees in 2020 and
to 47 employees in 2019.
2.4.2.1.2 Presentation of the management team
To ensure development of its products, the Company relies on a dynamic, highly qualified team, with
significant experience in large pharmaceutical groups.
On December 31, 2021, the Company employed 56 people, including one fixed-term contract
employee and 55 employees with permanent contracts. More than 62% of the workforce was assigned
to research and development activities, the remaining 38% being assigned to business development
operations and to administrative and financial management. The workforce includes three doctors,
ten pharmacists, ten PhDs (some of whom are also doctors or pharmacists) and nineteen scientists.
The team was composed of 19 men and 37 women, which represents 34% of men and 66% of women
while the senior management team is composed of 50 % of men and 50% of women.
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document an executive committee of ten people runs the
Company. Members of the executive committee collectively have expertise covering the value chain
necessary for development of a new drug. All have held positions of high responsibility, and for the
most part, have key experience working in pharmaceutical companies.
123
Thomas Kuhn, CEO and Co-Founder
Doctor of Pharmacy (Lyon – France) & MBA (Ashridge – UK)
Fifteen years of experience in the pharmaceutical industry (Generics UK and Merck Serono).
Has served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer since March 2009 and a member of its board
of directors since 2010. Mr. Kuhn began his career with Merck KGaA in 2000 where he held various
positions in clinical development, largely in the therapeutic area of Type 2 diabetes and was
responsible, in particular, for forging partnerships with Japanese pharmaceutical companies.
Between 2004 and 2007, Mr. Kuhn directed Merck’s global research and development projects with
two products in Phase 2 clinical trials and all the life cycle management projects, including for
metformin, the current reference in diabetes treatment. Following Merck’s acquisition of Serono in
2007, Mr. Kuhn was part of the team that refined Merck Serono’s strategy for divesting from the
diabetes therapeutic area.
Mr. Kuhn initiated and concluded the project for the transfer of Merck Serono’s assets under
development in Diabetes to the Company in March, 2009. Mr. Kuhn holds a pharmacy degree from
the University of Lyon I (France) and an M.B.A from Ashridge Business School (UK).
Pascale Fouqueray, Executive Vice President, in charge of Clinical Development and Regulatory
Affairs, Co-Founder
Doctor of Medicine (Angers-France), Endocrinologist (Paris-France) & Doctor in Sciences (Paris-
France)
Has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President of Early Development and Translational
Medicine since March 2009.
Dr. Fouqueray joined Merck KGaA in 2000 from Paris VII University, where she was an assistant
professor of physiology. At Merck KGaA, Dr. Fouqueray’s research activities were centered on
metabolism, with a particular focus on diabetes and obesity, and she was responsible for the clinical
development of compounds for the treatment of diabetes and gout disease.
Dr. Fouqueray holds an M.D. from the University of Angers (France) where she specialized in
endocrinology and metabolism at the Paris Descartes University (University of Paris V). Dr.
Fouqueray also holds a Ph.D. from the University of Paris-Sud (University of Paris XI).
Sébastien Bolze, Chief Operating Officer, Executive Vice President in charge of Project
Management, Non Clinical and Manufacturing operations, Co-Founder
Has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President of Non Clinical Development since May 2009.
Prior to joining the Company, from 2006 to 2009, Dr. Bolze served as global head of the preclinical
candidate selection unit at Solvay Pharmaceuticals, a chemical company, where he had experience
in drug development from discovery screening to first-in-man clinical trials.
From 2003 to 2006, Dr. Bolze held the position of executive head of the Absorption, Distribution,
Metabolism and Excretion (ADME) department at Fournier Pharma. Before 2003, Dr. Bolze was Head
of the Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism and Excretion department at Merck Santé.
Dr. Bolze has also co-authored numerous research publications and posters. Dr. Bolze holds a Ph.D.
in pharmacokinetics and drug metabolism from the University of Lyon I (France).
Sophie Bozec, Senior Vice President in charge of R&D Pharmacology and Scientific
Communication, Co-Founder
Has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President of R&D Pharmacology since July 2009. Dr. Bozec
joined Merck KGaA in 1998 where she managed a drug discovery team in a pharmacology
124
department. Dr. Bozec has acquired strong experience in managing research projects from target
identification to preclinical development candidates.
Dr. Bozec has developed her knowledge in models (in vivo and in vitro) used in research programs
for identifying preclinical development candidates in the diabetes field. She acquired an expertise
in metabolic diseases particularly in the diabetes field.
This experience in pharmacology led Dr. Bozec to support a clinical development compound for all
preclinical pharmacology aspects and contribute to clinical pharmacology designs.
Dr. Bozec holds a Ph.D. in Nutrition, Metabolism and Obesity from the Université Denis Diderot
(Paris VII).
Noah D. Beerman, Executive Vice President in charge of Business Development and President of
Operations in the United States
Has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President of Business Development and President of
U.S. Operations since May 2015.
Mr. Beerman has been an executive in the biopharmaceutical industry for more than 30 years,
beginning his career at Repligen, Sandoz, Curis, and Technology Management & Funding. In 1997,
Mr. Beerman joined Indevus Pharmaceuticals and served in business development capacities
including as Chief Business Officer from 2004 to 2009. At Indevus, Mr. Beerman was responsible for
multiple licensing, co-promotion and mergers and acquisitions agreements.
Subsequently, from 2009 to 2011, he served as President, Chief Executive Officer and director of RXI
Pharmaceuticals (now Galena BioPharma), and from 2011 to 2013, as Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer at Coronado Biosciences. From January 2014 to May 2015, Mr. Beerman
served as an executive consultant in the biopharmaceutical industry.
Mr. Beerman holds an M.B.A. from Northeastern University and a B.S. in molecular genetics from
the University of Rochester.
Dr. David E. Moller, Chief Scientific Officer
Has served as the Company’s Chief Scientific Officer since January 2020.
Dr. Moller has over 20 years of experience leading R&D efforts at Eli Lilly and Company and Merck,
where he focused on cardiometabolic drug discovery and development as well as other disease
areas including endocrine and musculoskeletal disorders.
He joined the Company from Sigilon Therapeutics, where as CSO he led the company’s rare disease
and type 1 diabetes efforts. Prior to that, Dr. Moller served in senior roles at Eli Lilly over a twelve-
year period, including Vice President (VP) of Endocrine and Cardiovascular Research and Clinical
Investigation and VP of Business Development – Emerging Technology and Innovation. Importantly,
his team was responsible for the development of Trulicity® (dulaglutide) (registered trademark of
Eli Lilly and Company) and other key product candidates. Prior to Eli Lilly, Dr. Moller served in senior
roles over a ten-year period at Merck. As VP of Metabolic Disorders, he led the global diabetes and
obesity discovery area, which included oversight of the team that discovered Januvia® (sitagliptin)
(registered trademark of Merck and Co).
Dr. Moller obtained a BS from Brown University and a Doctor of Medicine degree from the University
of Cincinnati. He began his career as Assistant Professor at Harvard Medical School focused on
elucidating the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes, where he had also completed a research and
clinical postdoctoral fellowship in Endocrinology. He has published more than 130 peer-reviewed
papers. His honors include election to the American Society of Clinical Investigation, the Association
of American Physicians, and appointment as an Adjunct Professor at the Karolinska Institute.
125
Anne Renevot, Chief Financial Officer
Has served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer since May 2017. Prior to joining the Company,
Ms. Renevot served as Chief Financial Officer of EOS Imaging from March 2011 to May 2017 where
she played a key role in EOS’ IPO on Euronext Paris, which raised €39 million. At EOS Imaging, Ms.
Renevot helped to raise capital through private placements, equity lines of credit debt offerings.
Ms. Renevot was responsible for financial regulatory compliance, financial planning and
communications, and she also held leading roles in the company’s acquisitions and partnerships.
Before her appointment at EOS Imaging, Ms. Renevot served at Cartier, a luxury goods company, as
Chief Financial Officer of Cartier Joaillerie Manufacturing Division and as International Financial
Controller.
Earlier in her career, Ms. Renevot served as Manager at EY Audit and as a Division Controller at Legris
Industries. Ms. Renevot holds a bachelor’s degree in finance from Audencia Business School in
Nantes, France and a master’s degree in corporate finance from Ohio State University, Columbus,
Ohio.
Quentin Durand, Chief Legal Officer & Head of Corporate Social Responsibility
Has served as the Company’s Chief Legal Officer since September 2019 and as Chief Legal Officer &
Head of Corporate Social Responsibility since November 2021. Prior to joining the Company, Mr.
Durand was a lawyer at Dechert LLP from March 2015 to September 2019 in Paris, where he focused
his practice on corporate and securities matters with an emphasis on capital markets, including
public company reporting and governance.
While at Dechert Mr. Durand worked closely with the Company. He was also involved in various
M&A and equity capital market transactions both domestic and cross border across a wide range of
industry sectors, including healthcare, technology and financial services. Prior to working at Dechert
LLP, Mr. Durand served as a legal officer within the corporate finance division of the Autorité des
marchés financiers where he was involved in numerous transactions and regulatory work. Mr.
Durand also acted as a prosecutor before the Autorité des marchés financiers enforcement
committee.
Mr. Durand holds a master’s degree in Management from ESCP Europe in France, and in Business
Law from University Paris Sud in France. Mr. Durand became a lawyer in 2010.
Elizabeth Woo, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations, Public Relations and Corporate
Communications
Has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Investor Relations, Public Relations and
Corporate Communications since 2021, with over 25 years of experience in the biopharmaceutical
industry.
Her experience in strategic investor and corporate communications spans the full life cycle of drug
development and commercialization. Mrs Woo has served in a senior leadership role at Flex Pharma,
a neuromuscular-focused company, as Senior Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate
Communications, taking the company public in 2015. Earlier in her career at Biogen, Mrs Woo held
a series of progressively responsible management and executive roles over a 12-year period and
served as Vice President, Investor Relations. In addition to her corporate roles, Mrs Woo has advised,
through her investor relations consulting practice, privately held and publicly traded biotech
companies, including Ironwood and Cubist.
126
Ms. Woo obtained an MBA from the Kellogg School of Management and holds bachelor’s degrees
in biochemistry and history from the University of California, Berkeley.
Sylvie Bertrand, Vice President, Human Resources
Has served as the Company’s Vice President, Human Resources since 2021.
Ms. Bertrand has 20 years of Human Resources experience in various industries and services. After
a few years as a mathematics teacher, she quickly turned to the HR profession by joining USG People
as a recruitment agency manager for 9 years. Ms. Bertrand then joined Sabert Corporation Europe
as HR Director for 7 years, where she defined and implemented the European Human Resources
strategy in a context of rapid growth.
Prior to joining the Company, she was HR Director at Thermo Fisher (previously Novasep) and spent
almost 4 years leading the Human Resources function of the European biopharma activities for the
Group.
Ms Bertrand brings strong expertise in supporting growing companies and implementing HR
strategies, processes, and forward-looking management to support their development.
Ms. Bertrand holds a Master's degree in mathematics.
In addition to the executive committee above, M. Takashi Kaneko, Ph.D., serves as Senior Vice
President of Medical and President of Poxel Japan. He sas served as the Company’s Vice-President of
Medical and as President of Poxel Japan K.K. since September 2018. Dr. Kaneko has over 33 years of
experience, which includes pharmaceutical industry experience with a focus on medical affairs and
clinical development ranging from product evaluation, development and post-commercial launch, and
clinical practice and medical research experience. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Kaneko was Head
of Medical Affairs at Janssen Pharmaceutical K.K. from December 2016 to March 2018. Prior to Janssen
Pharmaceutical K.K., Dr. Kaneko was the Department Head of the Medical Excellence Department in
the Medical Division at Novartis K.K. from November 2015 to November 2016. Dr. Kaneko also held
several senior-level positions at Santen from January 2012 to October 2015, which included the areas
of Compliance, Global Clinical Development and Medical Affairs, Head of Global Research and
Development as well as other research and development-related positions. In addition, Dr. Kaneko
was a Vice President, Medical Director at Sanofi Aventis K.K., and served in clinical development roles
at Bristol-Myers K.K., BMS, Japan. Dr. Kaneko holds an M.D. and Ph.D. degree from the University of
Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
This team is also surrounded by scientific boards composed of well-known experts in diabetology,
clinical development and new formulations, to collect their opinion on the results obtained during
development of the Company’s drug candidates, as well as on the next R&D steps.
The Company has established four committees of experts for its programs:
i.
A Scientific Committee on NASH, composed of seven members, reputed hepatologists and
opinion leaders in the United States and Europe, who are involved in the analysis of the results
obtained on PXL770 and PXL065 and who make recommendations on future studies to be
carried out. At the present time, the following committee members collaborate with the
Company on the two NASH products in development:
-
Professor Kenneth Cusi: Ken is Director of the Endocrinology, Diabetes and
Metabolism Department at the University of Florida (United States) School of
Medicine.
-
Professor Vlad Raziu: Vlad is Professor of Medicine at Université Pierre et Marie Curie
in Paris and works at the Hôpital de la Pitié Salpêtrière (France).
127
-
Stephen Harrison: Stephen is Visiting Professor of Hepatology at the Radcliffe
Department of Medicine in University of Oxford; Medical Director at Pinnacle Clinical
Research; and President at Summit Clinical Research in the UK.
-
-
-
-
Professor Arun Sanyal: Arun is Professor of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology,
Virginia Commonwealth School of Medicine (United States)
Professor Quentin Anstee: Quentin is Professor of Experimental Hepatology,
Newcastle University (UK)
Professor Philip Newsome: Philip is Director at Centre for Liver and Gastrointestinal
Research in University of Birmingham in the UK.
Professor Gregory Steinberg: Gregory works at Division of Endocrinology in the
Department of Medicine of the McMaster University in Ontario, Canada.
ii.
A Scientific Advisory Board for Rare Metabolic Diseases, composed of seven members, reputed
Scientifics and opinion leaders in the United States and Europe, who will shape Poxel’s
discovery and clinical-stage programs and further advance its mission to develop therapies for
rare metabolic diseases and who advise on its expansion of its clinical programs, and initiate
Phase 2a studies for ALD with both PXL065 and PXL770. At the present time, the seven
members of this committee are:
-
-
-
-
Professor Stephan Kemp: Stephan is Professor at the University of Amsterdam, in the
Netherlands.
Professor S.Ali Fatemi: Ali is a Professor and Chief Medical Officer at the Kennedy
Krieger Institute, Baltimore, US.
Professor Fanny Mochel: Fanny works at University Pierre and Marie Curie in Paris,
France.
Professor Florian Eichler: Florian is Director of the Center for Rare Neurologic
Disorders and Director of the Leukodystrophy Service at Massachusetts General
Hospital (MGH), Harvard Medical School, US.
-
-
-
Professor Marc Engelen: Marc is Professor at the Amsterdam University Medical
Centers, in the Netherlands.
Doctor Jaspreet Singh: Jaspreet works in the Department of Neurology at the Henry
Ford Health System in Detroit, US.
Professor Keith Van Haren: Karen is a Professor in Neurology and Neurological
Sciences at Stanford University, US.
iii.
A Scientific Diabetes Committee composed of three members, reputed diabetologists and
opinion leaders in the United States and Europe, who have been involved in the analysis of the
clinical results obtained on Imeglimin since the origin of the Company and make
recommendations on future studies to be carried out. These members are:
-
Professor Harold Lebovitz: Harold is currently a professor of medicine at SUNY Health
Science Center in Brooklyn (USA), where he also previously served as chief of the
Endocrinology Division and Director of the Clinical Research Center.
Professor John M. Amatruda: John is Professor Adjunct, Department of Medicine,
Section of Endocrinology, Yale University (United States)
Professor Ralph DeFronzo: Ralph is Professor of Medicine and Endocrinology at U.
Texas, San Antonio (United States).
-
-
128
iv.
A second Scientific Committee on Diabetes, consisting of five members, reputed diabetologists
and opinion leaders, in Japan, who make recommendations on product development strategy
in Japan and who take part in the analysis of clinical results of studies conducted in Japan. At
the present time, the five members of this committee are:
-
-
-
-
Professor Masato Kasuga: Masato is currently President of the National Center for
Global Health and Medicine, based in Tokyo, Japan.
Professor Kohjiro Ueki: Kohjiro is currently Professor at the University of Tokyo, Japan,
in the Diabetology Department.
Professor Wataru Ogawa: Wataru is Professor of Medicine and Head of the Clinical,
Diabetes and Metabolic Diseases Department of the University of Kobe (Japan).
Professor Hirotaka Watada: Hirotaka is Professor of Medicine in the Department of
Medicine, Metabolism and Endocrinology at the University of Juntendo, Tokyo (Japan)
School of Medicine.
-
Professor Kohei Kaku: Kaku is Professor at the Department of Internal Medecine of
Kawasaki Medical School, based in Okayama, Japan.
Finally, ad hoc experts are frequently enrolled for the development of the Company’s drug candidates.
2.4.2.1.3 Organization of operations
Nine departments manage the Company’s operations:
Science, Innovation and Scientific Communication Department: Composed of five people, the
Science, Innovation and Scientific Communication department manages all scientific aspects of the
company, defining and executing the strategy for non-clinical research and preclinical
pharmacology activities, supporting the Company’s pipeline expansion via scientific oversight of
new indications and external opportunities. The Science, Innovation and Scientific Communication
department is also responsible for preclinical and clinical scientific communications. The
department relies and work with a network of subcontractors, academic teams and key opinion
leaders. It continually develops and maintains this network to maintain a close relationship with
the teams and good response times. It also uses a network of international experts to challenge its
strategy and design its studies.
Project Management Office, Non Clinical & Manufacturing Department: Composed of eight
people, the Non Clinical, Manufacturing & Project Management Department defines the strategy
for non-clinical development (toxicology, pharmacokinetics and metabolism, bioanalysis), defines
the design of studies to be performed and then organizes and manages the subcontracting of these
studies. This department also manages all the manufacturing and supply activities of the Company,
through various third-party suppliers. All these activities are conducted with an ad hoc level of
quality (GLPs, GMPs, GCPs, etc.). To do so, it has all the necessary skills in chemistry,
manufacturing, analytics, packaging, pharmacokinetics, toxicology, and project management
either internally or through external consultants. It works closely with the medical department to
provide it with the necessary support in the design and completion of pharmacokinetic and/or
mechanistic clinical trials, in order also to ensure a smooth transition from preclinical to clinical.
The Project Management Office drives the programs execution with the Executive Committee and
liaise with Finance Department and head of functions to monitor budget and resources dedicated
to each program.
Clinical Development and Regulatory Affairs Department: Composed of sixteen people, the
Clinical Development and Regulatory Affairs department defines the clinical development strategy
in partnerships with the Science, Innovation and Scientific Communication, Non Clinical,
Manufacturing & Project Management and the Business Development departments. The
department prepares the design of the clinical studies to be performed, taking into account
objectives and constraints while ensuring feasibility. The department selects subcontractors and
129
controls all their activities during the completion of clinical studies, ensuring they are conducted
in compliance with good clinical practices. The Clinical Development and Regulatory Affairs
department also analyzes in detail the results, which will then be submitted to a committee of
international experts selected by the Company for discussion and validation before any external
exploitation. Finally, the Clinical Development and Regulatory Affairs Department ensures
registration with worldwide Regulatory agencies and in particular in US, EU and Japan and develop
competitive regulatory strategies for each program of the Company.
Japan Office: Composed of three people, the Japan Office is in charge of ensuring Imeglimin
success in Japan, together with the Company’s partner Sumitomo Pharma (SP). They are involved
in all activities associated to Imeglimin, R&D, regulatory and Medical affairs ones, in liaison SP and
the other members of the Company. Finally, the Japan Office also contributes to the development
strategy of all other PXL products in Asia.
Business Department and Investor Relations: Consisting of five people, it ensures development
of the Company’s assets with strategic partners. It establishes the partnership strategy with
industrial and biotech companies, academic teams and teaching hospitals. It ensures the smooth
operation of these partnering arrangements in relation with the corporate strategy, both for the
Company’s internal programs, and also the external opportunities aimed at adding to the
Company’s portfolio of products. It is also in charge of investor relations and public relations
worldwide.
Finance and Administration Department: Consisting of eight people, it manages day-to-day
accounting, financial and IT current issues, forecasts and anticipates cash needs by seeking
adequate resources for the conduct of projects undertaken by the Company, controls costs and
structures administrative procedures to minimize the financial risk factors detailed in Section 2.2.2
of this Universal Registration Document .
Legal Department: Composed of three people, the Legal Department supports the R&D, Finance,
Business development, Corporate Communications and HR functions for all legal related activities.
It oversees Corporate matters (assistance to the Board of Directors, General Meeting of
Shareholders, Governance). The Legal Department also drives compliance activities (GDRP,
securities law, business conduct), contract management and insurance.
Quality Assurance Department: Consisting of three people, the Quality Assurance Department
ensures quality compliance for all activities performed by the Company (internally and with
suppliers) to meet quality standards defined by key stakeholders including health authorities. It
also develops risk management approach and quality management system. The Quality Assurance
Department supports the others department in the definition and follow up of operational and
support processes. Then, it ensures that archiving R&D archiving activities are compliant.
Human Resources Department: Composed of three people, the Human Resources Department is
responsible for guiding and managing the overall HR processes, such as recruitment, training,
employee relations, facilities, compensation and benefits, and organization development.
2.4.2.2 Equity and stock options held by members of management
See Section 4.2 “Compensation” of this Universal Registration Document
2.4.2.3 Employee share ownership
In accordance with Article L.225-197-1 of the French Commercial code, the detention of performance
shares by the employees of the Company, in the process of being acquired or in the process of being
held, represents 2.94% of the share capital on a non-diluted basis.
130
To the Company’s knowledge at the date of this Universal Registration Document, the total
shareholding of the employees (founders excluded represents 0.92 % of the share capital on a non-
diluted basis.
2.4.2.4 Profit sharing and incentive agreements
None.
131
2.5
Corporate Social Responsibility Report
2.5.1 Message from the Chief Executive Officer
Dear Madam, Dear Sir,
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) initiatives have boomed worldwide, and at Poxel, we want to be
at the forefront of this, given its importance for the future. Indeed, since 2020, Poxel has initiated a
process to formalize its CSR approach and improve its global strategy on this key topic.
A dedicated working group was formed, with commitment from all departments. This report
represents the results of an 18-months work. This has been performed in parallel with the approval of
our first product and the strategic shift that we have initiated in 2021 that led to our increased focus
on rare diseases.
As Poxel’s mission is to improve the health and well-being of patients through the development of
innovative treatments for serious chronic diseases with metabolic pathophysiology, we believe that in
order to fulfil this mission, it is both essential and beneficial for all stakeholders, including ourselves,
that we perform our activities in the most responsible way, on social, governance and environmental
aspects, the three pillars on which we have built our CSR strategy. We strive for CSR to be an integrated
part of how we operate, and we intend to measure it, assess our progress over time, and communicate
that to you.
I look forward to sharing our CSR improvements with you in the future.
Thank you,
Thomas Kuhn, CEO of Poxel.
2.5.2 Poxel vision
2.5.2.1 Business model
Poxel is an international clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company whose mission is focused on the
development of novel treatments for serious chronic diseases with metabolic pathophysiology,
including rare metabolic disorders and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). With its expertise and
understanding of cellular energy regulation pathways related to metabolic diseases, and know-how in
the development of drug candidates, the Group is developing a portfolio of drug candidates, which
includes: PXL770 and PXL065, for both the treatment of NASH and X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy
(ALD), a rare disease.
Poxel was founded in 2009 through a spin-off of Merck Serono’s metabolic-focused business. As part
of this spin-off, the Group assumed key personnel for this group and assets from Merck Serono,
including Imeglimin and the AMPK activator program that led to the Group’s discovery of PXL770.
With its heritage in diabetes, Poxel’s first product, Imeglimin, was approved in June 2021 for the
treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan and launched in September 2021 as Twymeeg® by the Group’s
partner, Sumitomo Pharma.
In a new chapter of the Group’s evolution to bring novel therapies to patients, Poxel announced a
strategic shift in July 2021 and intends to advance and expand its portfolio of clinical assets for both
132
NASH and rare metabolic diseases, aligned with the Group’s. To achieve its goal, the Group is pursuing
the following strategies:
Develop the two clinical candidates, PXL065 and PXL770, each with potential benefits in both
NASH and ALD, and select one candidate to advance into a pivotal program for each indication;
Explore combination strategies for PXL770 and PXL065 for the treatment of NASH;
Increase its focus on rare metabolic diseases with the objective to advance and expand the
Group’s clinical pipeline of rare metabolic disease programs;
Build a metabolic franchise through expanding the portfolio by discovering, developing or
acquiring additional drug candidates and technologies;
Advance lmeglimin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes to commercialization (outside Japan)
with strategic partners;
Maximize the commercial potential of the Group’s wholly owned assets and opportunistically
enter into strategic collaborations.
Poxel’s Highlights
Improve the health and well -being of patients through the development of
innovative treatments for serious chronic diseases with metabolic
pathophysiology
Launch of
TWYMEEG ®
Rely on an experienced and skilled team
Expand in
Rare
2021
Metabolic
Diseases
2018
ALD*
Ensure eective governance practices
Internal
Opportunities
PXL065
PXL770
NASH
D-TZD2 Platform
AMPK3 Platform
PXL065
PXL770
2009
Limit our environmental impact
Type 2 Diabetes
External
Opportunities
Imeglimin
2.5.2.2 CSR Strategy
In 2020, Poxel decided to implement a process to improve its global approach on CSR (See Section 2.4
“Organizational structure “). In this context Poxel structured and formalized its CSR strategy and
decided to commit itself to specific goals and objectives.
133
Key axes of the CSR Strategy
Poxel’s mission is to improve the health and well-being of patients through the development of
innovative treatments for serious chronic diseases with metabolic pathophysiology. To achieve this
goal, Poxel dedicates the bulk of its resources to research and development activities and focuses on
indications with high unmet medical needs with the aim to improve the lives of patients, with whom
Poxel intends to build strong relationships.
The CSR strategy of Poxel is founded on three axes, all directed towards the Group’s mission:
Poxel relies on an experienced and skilled team which is built on equal opportunities without any
form of discrimination. Poxel cultivates the integration of talents and career management, invests
significantly to maintain and develop the expertise of its employees, and endeavors to foster the
best possible working conditions.
Poxel also relies on a highly experienced Board of Directors and Management team and has built
an internal organization dedicated to corporate social responsibility. Poxel endeavors to act
ethically in all its activities and to create sustainable relationships with its vendors. The Group is
also committed to apply the highest possible standards in terms of data protection and IT security.
While pursuing its mission, Poxel’s goal is to limit its impact on the environment as much as
possible. Poxel is taking action to minimize its greenhouse gas emissions and limit its pollution,
especially in connection with manufacturing and transportation of products, digital and office
pollution, and business travel.
2.5.2.3 Poxel’s commitments
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
The United Nations "2030 Agenda" for Sustainable Development, adopted by 193 countries with the
ambition to ensure a fair and inclusive transition to global sustainable development, has defined 17
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Poxel is committed to contribute to the following SDGs:
134
GOAL 3: GOOD HEALTH AND WELL-BEING
The core mission of Poxel is to deliver innovative treatments to improve health and well-
being of patients suffering from serious chronic diseases with metabolic
pathophysiology.
GOAL 4: QUALITY EDUCATION
Poxel maintains a high level of performance through a continuous training process for all
employees (based on an external and internal training portfolio). Collaboration with
Universities is developed in order to support interns and apprentices initiatives. Poxel is
also publishing in renown scientific journals on a regular basis to contribute to the
scientific community.
GOAL 5: GENDER EQUALITY
Poxel is pursuing various initiatives to promote gender equality and to raise awareness
of any form of discrimination. The share of women in the workforce and at each
management level is significant and Poxel intends to maintain this trend in the future.
GOAL 9: INDUSTRY, INNOVATION, AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Poxel dedicates the bulk of its resources to research and development and intends to
continue contributing to innovation.
GOAL 10 : REDUCED INEQUALITIES
Poxel encourages women's careers and pays attention to wage inequalities
GOAL 12: RESPONSIBLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
Poxel selects and audits its manufactures and other services providers through a rigorous
process. It is a key focus for Poxel to ensure responsible production of its drug candidates.
GOAL 13: CLIMATE ACTION
Climate change is a global challenge that affects everyone, everywhere. Although Poxel
has a relatively limited impact on climate change, Poxel is committed to better assess
and limit its carbon footprint
GOAL 17: PARTNERSHIPS
Poxel intends to cooperate and take part in global initiatives and the local CSR ecosystem
The Group intends to formalize measurables commitments to contribute to these SDGs in 2022.
CSR notation
Poxel is committed to participating in the global CSR data collection and analysis campaign of several
rating agencies and investors including in the financial sector.
Since 2019, Poxel has been proactively answering the ESG data collection and analysis campaign of
Gaïa Rating, ESG rating agency of EthiFinance. The Group has been rated on its level of transparency
and performance for each of the criteria evaluated (Governance, Social, Environment, Stakeholders).
This rating is used by leading management companies in their management processes and investment
decisions. The results highlight the quality and good practices of the Group in terms of its CSR policy.
The scores obtained since 2019 have been higher than the average score of the Gaïa panel.
135
CSR rankings
2021
2020
Poxel score at Gaïa index
60/100
55/100
Since 2020, Poxel also completed the annual ESG survey from BPI Tennaxia and the Fédération
Française de l’Assurance. These surveys do not include a scoring of the participants.
Poxel intends to participate in additional CSR analysis campaigns in the future.
2.5.2.4 CSR organization
CSR Initiative
In the third quarter of 2020, Poxel decided to initiate a structured approach to CSR with the aim to
formalize and improve the Group’s strategy on CSR. This initiative is relying on the expectations from
both external and internal stakeholders and is endorsed by the Group’s governance bodies.
A first audit phase was concluded in the first quarter of 2021. The goal was to assess the Group’s impact
on CSR matters based on an Environment, Social and Governance (ESG) approach.
The Group conducted peer reviews and internal surveys, sent various questionnaires to its vendors
and stakeholders, collected data and performed comparisons based on available benchmarks or public
sources with the goal to evaluate the Group’s impact, achievements and potential improvements for
each pillar of ESG. It also endeavored to identify what Poxel did not yet know or measure.
More than 170 indicators were evaluated, and a diagnostic matrix was completed. The results of the
audit were presented to the Board of Directors and the Management team of the Company.
Relying on the results of this audit phase, the Group defined its objectives and elaborated a 3-years
action plan to improve across all three “E”, “S” and “G” pillars.
The action plan was built based on the Group’s needs, expectations and areas of improvement as well
as around its core competencies. The objectives were mapped out and prioritized based on their
potential impact on CSR, their potential cost and the ability of the Group to successfully implement
them. The Group choose to prioritize actions which included quantifiable targets and were based on
specific timelines. In parallel, the Group worked on the implementation of key performance indicators
to allow the monitoring of its CSR impact over time.
The action plan was approved by the Board of Directors during its June 23, 2021 meeting and its
implementation began immediately thereafter. Furthermore, the Board of Directors decided during its
meeting held on January 27, 2022, that the successful implementation of the CSR action plan would
be one of the criteria for the Group’s 2022 objectives in connection with the variable compensation of
the Chief Executive Officer as well as of all employees.
CSR governance structure
The Group’s CSR initiative was launched through the creation of a cross-department working group.
As of the date of this report, the working group is composed of 9 members, representing the following
departments of the Company:
Project Management Office, Non-Clinical & Manufacturing
Clinical Development and Regulatory Affairs
Business Development and Investor Relations
Finance and Administration
Legal
Quality Assurance
Human Resources
136
The working group meets regularly, at least once a month, and is notably in charge of the
implementation of the Group’s CSR action plan, the monitoring of the key performance indicators and
the diffusion of CSR related information to the entire team. All employees of the Group have been
involved in the identification and launch of the Group’s action plan and are taking an active part in its
implementation.
In November 2021, M. Quentin Durand, member of the Executive Committee, was appointed Head of
Corporate Social Responsibility in addition to his responsibilities as Chief Legal Officer with the task to
ensure the implementation and monitoring of the CSR strategy. He is also responsible for the
coordination of the work of the CSR cross department working group and for providing information on
CSR impacts including long-term development and sustainability of the Group in connection with the
strategic decisions of the Group.
In September 2021, the Board of Directors decided to amend the name and duties of its Nominating
and Governance committee and to create a Nominating and Corporate Social Responsibility
Committee. The objective of the Nominating & Corporate Social Responsibility Committee is to assist
the Board of Directors on all CSR matters in connection with the Group's CSR strategy.
2.5.3 Main CSR risks and opportunities
2.5.3.1 Materiality Assessment
The Group conducted a review of its extra-financial risks. Main risks and issues are presented in the
table below and developed within the framework of the present CSR report. The main policies put in
place to limit these risks are developed subsequently.
137
Field
Description
Reference section
Fostering the
integration and
retention of talents
The Group’s business model relies on a high degree of
expertise. As such, talent management is a priority to
integrate and retain key players and secure business
continuity.
2.5.5.2
Dedicate the bulk of
the Group resources
to R&D
As a Group focused on innovation and development, most
of the human resources and funds need to be dedicated to
R&D.
2.5.4.2
2.5.5
Developing and
maintaining skills
Maintaining a high level of team training is a major
competitive challenge for the Group. A competitive team
can generate innovation, unique scientific results and
partnerships.
Ensure team
satisfaction
Human capital is one of the main assets of the Group and
the productivity of the employees is a key factor in
competitiveness. Working conditions (quality of work
environment, stress, respect for work-life balance,
awareness of harassment) can lead to decrease or increase
psychosocial risks.
2.5.5.1; 2.5.5.5
Failure in
compliance and
quality
In case of non-compliance of R&D activities with
regulatory requirements that set a high quality level
expectations of services and products, there is a risk that
the safety and health of patients will be compromised.
Clinical tests performed on animals expose the Group to
controversies and recurring requests about the tests
performed. The risk also relates to the lack of guarantee
from suppliers at risk on their practices and compliance
with clinical rules on animals.
2.5.6.3
2.5.6.3
Impact on animal
welfare
Acting ethically
The Group is internationally established and exposed to
risks related to its ethical conduct. Non-compliance with
regulations, industry standards or a failure to comply with
control mechanisms could lead to heavy administrative
and criminal penalties for the Group and have negative
impacts on its reputation.
2.5.6.2
2.5.6.4
2.5.6.3
Apply the highest
possible standards
of IT security and
data protection
The Group is developing new treatments from pre-clinical
studies to the marketing of drug candidates. As part of its
clinical activities, personal and confidential data of
patients is processed. A leak of this data is a risk for the
Group and the trust that its patients place in it.
Creating sustainable Select appropriate and qualified vendors with a high level
relationships with
vendors
of experience in pharmaceutical development, and
appropriate accreditations. Maintaining long term
business relationships with suppliers allows the Group to
be more efficient in its research and development
activities.
Minimising
Although the Group does not have any production site, it is
committed to reduce the environmental impacts of its
activities and pays particular attention to limiting pollution
related to the conduct of its business: business travels,
facilities, manufacturing and product transportation.
greenhouse gas
emissions and
limiting pollution
2.5.7.1
2.5.7.2
Deploy a
responsible digital
approach
The Group’s activity is widely based on the use of digital
tools. Controlling its impact requires the dissemination of
good practices to all employees.
138
2.5.3.2 Key Performance Indicators
The Group identified several performance indicators to allow the monitoring of its CSR impact.
Risk / Issue
Key performance indicator
Applicable SDG
Dedicate the bulk of
the Group resources
to R&D
- R&D budget (percentage vs total operational expenses)
- Number of employees in R&D (percentage vs total
number of employees)
Develop innovative
treatments for chronic
serious metabolic
diseases to improve
the health and well-
being of patients
- Pipeline progression (stage of development and number
of programs)
- Patents filed
Providing employees
with an optimal
working environment
Promote equal
- Employee pulse survey score*
- Absenteeism rate
- Share of women in the workforce
- Share of women in management positions
- Gender wage gap
opportunities
Fostering the
integration of talent
and career
- Compensation gap (CEO vs average and Median of
employees)
- Evolution of fixed compensation by level of responsibility
management
Ensure critical
- Number of employees
competencies adapted - Average age of employees
to the Group’s needs
to support its
activities
- Average seniority
- Turnover rate
Create sustainable
relationships with
vendors
- % of vendors retained in accordance with CSR RFP policy
Apply the highest
possible standards of
IT security and data
protection
- Number of IT intrusion tests conducted
- Nr of IT attacks suffered
- % of employees trained on IT security issues
Minimize Poxel’s
Greenhouse gas
emissions and limit
pollution
- Level of greenhouse gas emissions*
- Total energy consumption*
- Share of renewable energy (MWh)*
Deploy a responsible
digital approach
- Weight of stored data
- Weight of discarded IT equipment (in kg)*
- Share of discarded IT equipment re-used/recycled
*Data not available for 2021.
139
2.5.4 Bring innovative treatments to patients suffering for serious chronic diseases with metabolic
pathophysiology
2.5.4.1 Develop innovative treatments for serious chronic metabolic diseases to improve the
health and well-being of patients
Poxel is an international clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of
novel treatments for serious chronic diseases with metabolic pathophysiology, including rare
metabolic disorders and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). With its expertise and understanding of
cellular energy regulation pathways related to metabolic diseases, and know-how in the development
of drug candidates, the Group is developing a portfolio of drug candidates, which includes: PXL770 and
PXL065, for both the treatment of NASH and the rare disease, X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD).
Poxel intends to advance into pivotal trials one program in NASH and one in ALD. Earlier stage
programs focusing on chronic and rare metabolic indications are also in progress.
Poxel’s first product, Imeglimin, was approved in June 2021 for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in
Japan and launched in September 2021 as TWYMEEG® by the Group’s partner, Sumitomo Pharma.
Following the recent approval of TWYMEEG® (Imeglimin) in Japan, in a new chapter of the Group’s
evolution, Poxel announced a strategic shift in July 2021 with the goal to advance and expand its
portfolio of clinical assets for both NASH and rare metabolic diseases leveraging existing platforms and
proven capabilities.
The table below sets forth details relating to the current stages of development of the Group’s
clinical and preclinical drug candidates in type 2 diabetes, rare diseases and NASH:
Robust Mid-to-Late Stage Metabolic Pipeline
Focus on Rare Metabolic Diseases and NASH
Approved
Discovery /
Indication
MOA
PH1
PH2
PH3
/
Upcoming Milestones
PC
Marketed
NASH
Phase 2 results expected Q3 2022
505(b)(2) pathway
Non-Genomic
TZD1
PXL 065
NASH
NASH
AMPK2
Activator
Successful Phase 2a Study
Evaluate next steps early 2023
PXL7 70
Rare Metabolic Indications
Fast Track Designation granted April 2022
Initiate Phase 2a midyear 2022
PXL7 70
ALD3
AMPKActivator
7
Fast Track Designation granted Feb 2022
Non-Genomic
TZD
PXL 065
ALD3
7
Initiate Phase 2a midyear 2022
Completed preclinical; develop clinical strategy
Select lead candidate(s)
PXL7 70/Next -Gen AMPK
ADPKD4
AMPKActivator
Not
Disclosed
Non-Genomic
TZD
Next-Gen D-TZD
Type 2 Diabetes (T2D)
TWYMEEG ® Japan /Asia 5
TWYMEEG approved for T2D in Japan in June 2021
Product launched September 2021
Poxel entitled to receive 8 -18% royalty on net sales
MRC6
Modulator
T2D
T2D
Imeglimin
US / EU / Other
MRC Modulator
Considering specific territories partnerships
1.
Deuterium-mo dified t hiazo lidinedione
5. Includes: China, South Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Philippines,
Singapore, Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos
6. Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain
2. AMP-kinase
3. X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy
4. Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease
7.
Subject to additional finan cing
Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)
NASH is a severe form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) that results in an accumulation of
fat in the liver and is one of the most common liver diseases in the United States. It affects
approximately 20% of the world's population and up to 70% of type 2 diabetes patients. According to
published estimates, about 10% to 30% of NAFLD patients also suffer from NASH. A scientific
publication in 2018 estimated that there were approximately 16.5 million prevalent NASH cases in the
United States in 2015, which was projected to increase by 63% to 27.0 million cases by 2030.
140
With no approved drug treatments, NASH can lead to life-threatening conditions like cirrhosis, liver
failure, liver cancer and death. NASH is considered one of the main causes of cirrhosis in adults. NASH
is also under-diagnosed and is a silent disease, meaning patients have no symptoms until the first signs
of liver failure appear. Many patients with NASH have type 2 diabetes (estimated 47%)36 and many
patients with type 2 diabetes also have NASH (estimated 26%)37. In addition, patients with NASH and
coexisting type 2 diabetes are more likely to have progressive fibrosis. Cases of liver cirrhosis related
to NASH are the second leading cause of liver transplants in the United States and are expected in the
next few years to become the leading cause of transplantation, ahead of hepatitis C and alcoholic
cirrhosis.
Rare Metabolic Disease – X-Linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD)
X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy – ALD – is a deadly, inherited rare metabolic disease characterized by
neurodegeneration. ALD is a monogenic inborn error of metabolism due to mutations in the ABCD1
gene which encodes a key cellular fatty acid transporter – this defect results in accumulation of very
long chain fatty acids (VLCFA) with resulting damage to several tissues in particular neurons.
ALD is increasingly being diagnosed based on the recent and broad-based adoption of newborn
screening. Thus, the prevalence of ALD is similar to hemophilia or spinal muscular atrophy – about
20,000 in the US alone.38 Globally it may affect more than 400,000 people.
Forms of this disease include cerebral ALD (C-ALD) and adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN) which is the
most common form – typically occurring in adolescence through adulthood. AMN is characterized by
chronic and progressive distal axonopathy involving the long tracts of the spinal cord and to a lesser
extent the peripheral nerves resulting in progressive stiffness and weakness in the legs, impaired gait
and balance, incontinence, and loss of sensation. As an X-linked disease, nearly all men with a diagnosis
of ALD will develop AMN and are more severely affected, but many women also present with features
of AMN with a later onset. C-ALD is characterized by inflammatory demyelination of cells in the brain
and typically afflicts children, but many men with AMN may also develop cerebral disease; these white
matter brain lesions lead to severe neurologic deficits and death.
There are currently no approved medicines for ALD (other than glucocorticoid supplements for
associated adrenal insufficiency). Cerebral-ALD (C-ALD), when first detected in early childhood, can be
treated with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, but it is currently limited to early stage of C-ALD
and this procedure is at risk of severe adverse reactions.
Type 2 Diabetes
According to the International Diabetes Foundation, in 2021 an estimated 537 million people between
the ages of 20 and 79 are living with diabetes globally (1 in 10), with more than 90% of those affected
having type 2 diabetes. This estimate is predicted to rise to 643 million by 2030 and 783 million by
2045. Diabetes caused at least USD 966 billion in total healthcare expenditures in 2021, a 316%
increase over the last 15 years. Globally, 541 million adults have Impaired Glucose Tolerance, which
places them at high risk of type 2 diabetes.
According to Decision Resources, Japan is the second largest diabetes market worldwide, behind the
United States, with a compounded annual growth rate of more than 18% between 2008 and 2012 and
could grow by more than 20% by 2023. There are an increasing number of patients seeking treatment
for diabetes in Japan, both type 1 and type 2.
For further details on the potential benefits of the Group’s drug candidates for each of these
indications please refer to Section 2.1 “Business” of the Universal Registration Document.
36 Younossi ZM et al; Hepatology 2016.
37 Cusi et al, Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; Portillo/Cusi et al, J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2015
38 Bezman L. Am J Med Genet. 1998; 76:415-19.; Matteson J. Int J Neonatal Screen. 2021, 7:22
141
The Group’s goal in the near future is to increase its focus on rare metabolic diseases with the objective
to advance and expand the Group’s clinical pipeline of rare metabolic disease programs through
expanding the portfolio by discovering, developing or acquiring additional drug candidates and
technologies. The Group believes that building such a metabolic franchise would bring significant
improvements to the health and well-being of patients affected by serious metabolic diseases.
2.5.4.2 Dedicate the bulk of the Group’s resources to Research and Development
The Group engages in substantial research and development efforts to develop potential treatments
for type 2 diabetes, NASH and X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) as well as to discover novel
therapies.
Research and development activities and innovation are central to its activities as Poxel relies on its
inventions and patents to create long term value ensure its sustainability. The Group filed 7 new patent
applications in 2021 (compared to 3 new patent applications in 2020).
More than 62% of its human resources is assigned to research and development activities. The
workforce includes three doctors, ten pharmacists, ten PhDs (some of whom are also doctors or
pharmacists) and nineteen scientists.
The Group dedicates more than 70% of its financial resources to research and development
demonstrating its commitment to develop innovative treatments. This amount is extremely significant
compared to other industries and even within the pharmaceutical sector.
2021
70%
63%
2020
73%
64%
Resources dedicated to R&D
R&D budget (percentage vs total operational expenses)
Number of employees in R&D (percentage vs total number of employees)
The Group research and development efforts are currently focused on its drug candidates, PXL770 and
PXL065 both for the treatment of NASH and X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) and consist primarily
of:
expenses associated with third-party contractors and academic institutions involved in
preclinical studies or clinical trials for PXL770 and PXL065;
personnel expenses, including salaries, benefits and share-based compensation, for its 33
employees (on average in 2021) engaged in scientific research and development functions
as well as conference and travel expenses;
professional fees, including fees related to maintenance of its intellectual property
portfolio;
laboratories and allocated facilities expenses.
142
The following table summarizes its outsourced research and development expenses by drug candidate
and preclinical program for the periods presented:
December 31,
2021
December 31,
2020
(In € thousands)
Imeglimin
PXL770
481
1 410
4 068
8 033
7 533
PXL065
11 759
Since inception, the Group has significantly invested in the development of its drug candidates with
accumulated losses through December 31, 2021, of €179 million. The Group had a net loss of €23.8
million and €31.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020 respectively. The Group
had cash and cash equivalents of €32.3 million as of December 31, 2021.
In the near future, the Group expects that its research and development costs will increase as drug
candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have significant development costs due to
the size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. The Group is committed to continue dedicating the
bulk of its financial and human resources to research and development activities in order to bring
innovative treatments to patients suffering from serious chronic metabolic diseases
2.5.4.3 Build strong relationships with patients and other stakeholders within the scientific
community
As part of its strategy, Poxel is committed to building strong strategic relationships with patient
advocacy groups, partners in the industry, academia and expert networks throughout the world. The
Group has an established footprint in the field of metabolic diseases and already built a solid network
of stakeholders within the scientific community.
Patient advocacy groups
In connection with its strategic shift announced in July 2021, the Group intends to advance and expand
its portfolio of clinical assets for rare metabolic diseases. In this context, the Group believes essential
to build strong relationships with patients to better understand the disease and their needs.
In 2021, the Group has established collaborations with several important patient advocacy groups in
the field of X-linked adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD):
Poxel participated to several scientific and patient advocacy conferences related to X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) and presented its programs. It sponsored several conferences organized
by major advocacy organizations, such as ALD Connect, United Leukodystrophy Foundation, Alex TLC.
Partnerships
Since December 2017, Poxel has had a strategic partnership with Sumitomo Pharma for the
development and commercialization of Imeglimin in Japan, China, South Korea, Taiwan and nine other
143
Southeast Asian countries (Indonesia, Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore,
Myanmar, Cambodia, and Laos).
In 2018, through an agreement with DeuteRx LLC, the Group acquired exclusive worldwide rights to
PXL065, an innovative clinical-stage drug candidate for the treatment of NASH and X-linked
adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), which has successfully completed Phase 1 development. As part of the
agreement with DeuteRx, the Group also acquired a portfolio of additional deuterated drug candidates
for metabolic, specialty and rare diseases.
In May 2015, the Group entered into a license agreement with Enyo Pharma S.A.S, for its farnesoid X
receptor, or FXR, agonist program. Enyo has launched the Phase 2 development program for hepatitis
B and is studying its development potential for NASH. In July 2021, Enyo announced positive results
for Vonafexor, in a Phase 2a study in NASH and topline interim results from two ongoing Phase 2a
studies in chronic hepatitis B patients.
Poxel works closely with academic leaders in the fields of metabolic diseases, cardiovascular diseases,
mitochondrial dysfunction and rare diseases. The Group has worked or made publications and
presentations with the following institutions:
University of Rouen, UMR INSERM 1096, France;
Institution Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan 48202, United States of America;
Universidad Pablo de Olavide – Centro Andaluz de Biologia del Desarrollo (CABD), Spain;
Centre for Metabolism, Obesity and Diabetes Research and Division of Endocrinology and
Metabolism, Department of Medicine McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada ;
Department of Parasitology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Experts
Poxel is also surrounded by scientific boards composed of well-known experts in diabetology, clinical
development and new formulations, to collect their opinion on the results obtained during
development of the Group’s drug candidates, as well as on the next R&D steps.
The Group has established four committees of experts for its programs:
i.
A Scientific Committee on NASH, composed of seven members, reputed hepatologists and
opinion leaders in the United States and Europe, who are involved in the analysis of the
results obtained on PXL770 and PXL065 and who make recommendations on future studies
to be carried out.
ii.
A Scientific Advisory Board for Rare Metabolic Diseases, composed of seven members,
reputed Scientifics and opinion leaders in the United States and Europe, who will shape
Poxel’s discovery and clinical-stage programs and further advance its mission to develop
therapies for rare metabolic diseases and who advise on its expansion of its clinical
programs, and initiate Phase 2a studies for ALD with both PXL065 and PXL770;
A Scientific Diabetes Committee composed of three members, reputed diabetologists and
opinion leaders in the United States and Europe, who have been involved in the analysis of
the clinical results obtained on Imeglimin since the origin of the Group and make
recommendations on future studies to be carried out;
A second Scientific Committee on Diabetes, consisting of five members, reputed
diabetologists and opinion leaders, in Japan, who make recommendations on product
development strategy in Japan and who take part in the analysis of clinical results of studies
conducted in Japan;
iii.
iv.
Finally, ad hoc experts are frequently enrolled for the development of the Group’s drug candidates.
144
In 2021, the Group made 11 publications related to its programs (Imeglimin, PXL770 and PXL065) in
renowned journals such as The Lancet Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Diabetes, Obesity and
Metabolism, Cell Reports Medicine, Phsyiological Reports and Hepatology Communications.
In the future, Poxel intends to maintain its existing collaborations and further expand its network of
stakeholders within the scientific community.
2.5.5 Build and foster a team of experts
To fulfill its mission, Poxel relies on a very experienced and skilled team which is built on equal
opportunities without any form of discrimination. The team is composed of experts with extensive and
proven experience in developing innovative treatment for metabolic diseases and rare disorders. Poxel
invests significantly to maintain and develop the expertise of its employees and endeavors to place its
team in the best possible working conditions.
With the appointment in 2021 of Mrs. Sylvie Bertrand as Vice President, Human Resources, the head
of the Human Resources department is now a member of the Executive Committee of the Group.
Poxel's Human Resources strategy has been structured to support Group’s development and strategic
orientations through adapted HR initiatives and mission aligned with Group’s needs, supporting
fulfillment of corporate objectives and contributing to employee’s individual engagement, satisfaction
and development.
A snapshot of the Group’s workforce is set forth in the table below:
2.5.5.1 Ensure critical competencies adapted to the Group’s needs to support its activities
Attract and develop the best level of expertise
Poxel believes that excellence is the key to success. The Group is committed to ensuring a
homogeneous and qualitative processes to attract, select and develop the best talents and skills
adapted to its needs. As so, Poxel is composed of a talented and experienced professional teams who
are committed to expand their know-how and passion for excellence daily. The Group’s priority is to
maintain its staff at the highest level of expertise especially through tailor made training programs
(including personal coaching, MBA etc).
The Group endeavors to create the best working conditions to allow employees to focus on innovation
and development as part of Poxel’s mission to develop innovative treatments for chronic serious
metabolic diseases to improve the health and well-being of patients. Human Resources approach is
defined to continuously combine efficiency and social logic by taking care of the human capital and
145
developing knowledge, talents, skills, abilities, experience & intelligence possessed individually and
collectively to support sustainable company growth.
Rely on a strong people development process
First and foremost, the Group supports employee’s development and promotion through internal
career paths. Priority is given to current employees when new positions are opening. Personalized
support programs are defined in this case to accompany the person in her/his new role.
Recruitment processes have been defined in order to select the best talents, based on a strong analysis
of the Group’s needs through dedicated job-descriptions and considering the best match between
both internal or external candidate’s expectations, skills, behavior and the Group’s organization and
culture to bring guaranty of success.
Cooptation has been deployed to activate collaborators networks, who act as Group’s ambassadors,
and thus facilitate the access to experts from the same field and their recommendations. The use of
external recruitment agencies, specialized in Biopharma industry and knowing Poxel for multiple years,
allows the Group to extend the research when needed.
For the future, the objective of the Group is to build close relationships with universities in order to
integrate adapted profiles as soon as they leave school.
2.5.5.2 Foster the integration of talent and career management
Integration of new talents and career management are Group priorities.
Onboarding and exit processes
Integration policy is involving both Human Resources, Management and Quality Assurance
departments. Through this process, any newcomer at the Group experiments a tailor-made
onboarding program based on several actions (welcome day, inductions with key members of the
team, documentation, general training sessions on internal tools, astonishment report, confirmation
meeting). Human resources also organize programs after any kind of long-term leave (more than 1
month).
Exit interview process is involving manager, human resources and CEO. This process is based on the
following steps in order to maintain good relations even after the collaboration:
Organize exit interviews with: 1- Manager; 2- Human Resources Department
Analyze exit interview content to intent continuous improvement actions
Communicate exit interview contents to the CEO
Create a positive experience for the leaving person
Retention policy, compensation and benefits
In addition to its people development approach, the Group regularly implements measures to
strengthen the commitment of its employees (e.g., interesting missions, versatility, working
conditions, remuneration, benefits…)
These measures are meant to develop the attractiveness of the Group and to increase employees’
engagement.
2021
2020
Turnover
13,21%*
7,84%
Turnover rate
*The increase in the turnover rate is mainly resulting from the increase of the Group’s size and the consequences of Covid-19
outbreak.
The compensation and benefits strategy of the Group is built on a long-term employees retention
approach.
146
The first pillar relates to compensations. The compensation policy is relying on an internal pay scale
reflecting position’s responsibilities, impact on activities, level of expertise and allowing to guaranty
internal equity. This scale is compared to the market on a regular basis in order to ensure competitivity
of the Group in a very competitive sector.
2021
3,72
2020
3,57
Compensation gap
CEO vs Average of all Poxel employees (1)
CEO vs Median of all Poxel employees (2)
CEO vs SMIC
5,77
5,41
22,61
21,95
(1)
The ratio has been calculated in application with the following formula: (Total Compensation of the Chief
Executive Officer / Median annual compensation of the Group’s employees)
(2)
The ratio has been calculated in application with the following formula: (Total Compensation of the Chief
Executive Officer / Average annual compensation of the Group’s employees)
2021
2020
Evolution of fixed compensation
% of increase of fixed compensation per FTE
4.94%
4.92%
The second pillar relates to benefits. The benefits policy is to invest on long term strategy to increase
every single employee’s motivation to contribute to the Group’s success and development through the
following axes in addition to a strong health cover plan (additional benefits are described in
Section 2.5.2.5.5.5 “Provide employees with an optimal working environment”):
Annual bonus: based on corporate objectives and depending on function’s levels of
responsibilities and impact on the Group as well as on individual results. The performance
criteria used to determine variable compensation relies on a plan of precise objectives based
on quantitative and qualitative criteria, which correspond to objectives common to the Group
as well as on individual results. The corporate objectives are based on criteria including CSR,
the financing of the Group as well as the performance of various key steps in the field of
research and development and business development. The share of variable compensation for
the workforce was of 15% for 2021 (compared to 18% for 2020);
Performance shares: following the same conditions of attribution and calculated on Group’s
global results. The performance shares which can be granted are subject to a two-years
acquisition period and an additional one-year lock-up period. The performance conditions set
out for the purposes of the acquisition of the performance shares by the Board of Directors
are based on precise objectives (quantitative and qualitative criteria) which include, (i) certain
clinical milestones to be reached and (ii) certain business development milestones.
Benefits
2021
% of fully diluted capital potentially held employees on the basis of performance
shares being under acquisition or vesting period
2,95%
1,50%
% of non-diluted capital held by employees*
*Founders excluded
Starting 2022, the Group intends to implement a formal “talent review process” in order to identify
future needs and strengthen career paths for its talents.
Social dialogue
The Company refers to Pharmaceutical Industry Collective bargaining agreement.
In accordance with social representation regulations, the Company set up its first Comité Social et
Economique (CSE) four years ago and is preparing to renew its members based on four-years
mandates. This institution is composed of four staff representatives (two principals and two deputy
147
representatives). Monthly meetings allow both Company and employees representatives to maintain
a constructive dialogue driven by transparency, consultation, and attention.
An annual communication is planned at the level of the CSE to discuss the CSR action plan.
In 2022, the Group started to release a quarterly internal newsletter to provide broader information
about Group’s life, events and employees successes. In addition to those initiatives to maintain open
social dialogue, Human Resources department is continuously developing proximity with all
employees. The Group had no material litigation related to potential social or HR issues in 2021 or
2020.
Favor team’s engagement
Poxel is sensitive to create best working conditions for its employees. To do so, the Group has
implemented several activities to strengthen engagement and internal cohesion.
Poxel days: monthly activities focused on wellness, team building, “get to know each other”,
learning and awareness
One Coffee, one job: one job is under the spotlight once a month
Corporate Calls: updated general information is shared with employees
Corporate meetings: conferences, team building and corporate communication twice a year
Internal newsletter
Charities actions
Employee’s satisfaction is measured on a regularly basis through assessments regarding:
Working conditions & environment
Social dialogue
CSR approach and actions
Starting 2022, the Group intends to initiate a pulse survey which will take the form of a questionnaire
sent to employees to better assess these items.
2.5.5.3 Promote equal opportunities
Whether at the time of recruitment or during the employee's life in the Group, Poxel is committed to
diversity and equal opportunity.
Measures to avoid discriminations
The Group relies on a strong internal/external recruitment process based on factual needs and
targeted skills. Job descriptions describe mission, responsibilities, interactions and skills or experience
required to endorse the function.
The adequation between qualifications and Group’s needs is the only criteria retained by the Group
independently from any other consideration.
The Group ensures equal pay for equal work.
Gender equality policy
Poxel is committed to gender equity as demonstrated by the Group’s gender balance. In 2021, 66,07%
of the employees are women and 33,93% are men. The management position (21 employees) is mostly
occupied by women (14 employees).
Gender equality
2021
66,04%
67%
2020
66,07%
68%
Share of women among total workforce
Share of women in management positions
148
Share of women within the 10 highest wages
Share of women within the Executive Committee
30%
50%
40%
50%
Compensation & benefits policy is built on an internal referential considering function, responsibilities
and seniority without any other consideration.
Globally, the ratio of average woman wages against average men wages is 1,45 in France and 1,33 for
the United Stated, justified by the difference of seniority and level of responsibilities of the
benchmarked employees.
Several initiatives about gender inequality are taking place within the Group such as celebrating
women’s day and gender parity presentations.
Poxel intends to continue raising awareness on this particular topic and maintaining its current
organization while further reducing the gender wage gap. The “Pennicaud” index will become a
reference as soon as the critical mass of data to ensure the relevance of the system is reached.
Adopt a long-term “disability” policy
In 2019, the Group initiated the implementation of a policy to promote the integration of people
recognized as disabled. The objective is to allow all conditions to be met so that persons with
disabilities can come forward more easily. Poxel is committed to provide its disabled employees with
necessary care and possible adaptations of positions.
After carrying out a diagnosis and identifying the challenges for the Group, an action plan around four
axes was defined and has been implemented:
Internal awareness - In November 2021, a Poxel week was dedicated to this subject to raise
awareness and to train employees concerning the subject;
Internal mobilization – An initiative with “Association Cœur de Bouchons” with the aim to help
the association with the acquisition of specific equipment for disabled people was launched in
November 2021;
Team training - A member of the human resources team has been trained to become a
disability referent;
Recruitment and integration - Poxel is an equal opportunity employer that is committed to
diversity and inclusion in the workplace and considers any profile that meets its need
Collaboration with the sheltered and adapted work sector, in particular through service
contracts with several Établissement et service d'aide par le travail (ESAT - employment of the
disabled). The Group is working with two ESAT in 2021;
Job retention and career support – The Group currently has 2.13% employees recognised as
disabled workers (compared to 2.22% in 2020).
2.5.5.4 Develop and maintain skills
Maintaining a high level of team training is a major competitive challenge for the Group.
A competitive team can generate innovation and unique partnerships. The staff is highly skilled, and
the Group attaches great importance to maintaining this high individual level of knowledge and skill of
each employee through an ambitious training plan. This training plan, established since 2017, is in line
with the Group’s strategy and a focus on personal development of its employees and management of
skills.
Skills management actions
The collection of training needs takes place in the first quarter of each year during the annual
interviews and professional evaluations. These needs are then escalated and give rise to an arbitration
149
with the HR Department and the CEO. On this occasion, individual career-building support is offered
to each employee.
In 2021, despite the global sanitary and economic context, the Group continued to support the
development of its employees: all employees benefit from training sessions in 2021 for a training
contribution budget of around 2% of the payroll (out of a total initial budget of 6,78% of allocated
payroll).
Monitoring of training plans
2021
2020
Number of training hours by employees
11.49*
31.3
*Decrease due to the Covid-19 outbreak
In 2021, Poxel management team members followed the following training path: "Top Management"
course for the 11 members of the Management Committee and "Proximity Management" course,
which involved 6 employees.
The team skills development is mainly carried out through technical monitoring, for which each team
is responsible, as well as through participation in symposia and conferences. Thus, the intervention of
Poxel at the following conferences can be mentioned: in the field of NASH (NASH Summit, NASH-TAG,
EASL, AASLD) and in the field of ALD (NORD Rare Summit, World Congress Neurology).
Career development
Management cycles are organized to ritualize performance and career development face to face
meetings supported by a dedicated HR information system :
Annual and professional interview for all employees - feed-back moment between
employees and managers to assess the yearly performance and satisfaction, workload,
training needs and general expectations on a common basis;
Mid-year reviews for all employees - similar content to readjust objectives if needed and give
intermediary feed-back;
“Forfait jour” meeting for all employees - about work-life balance, Group’s life and well-being
in general.
In 2021, 3,57% of employees have been promoted, respecting gender equity (50% each).
2.5.5.5 Provide employees with an optimal working environment
By defining a prevention plan including policies (disconnection charter, home office agreement),
parenthood management, social dialogue mechanisms, Poxel is committed to ensure the best possible
conditions for work through adapted offices.
Work-life balance
As part of a reflection on a new and more operational work organization, the Group decided to
implement home office through an agreement signed in January 2019 and defining the conditions for
home office within the Group. In 2021, the home office agreement has been reviewed to satisfy
evolution needs.
The Group is sensitive to create moments dedicated to exchanges between employees (at least two-
days a week) as well as facilitating access to home office and giving employees the opportunity to
reduce the time and risks associated with transport and manage work life balance up to two-days a
week without any obligation.
This agreement is completed by a “right to disconnect” agreement implemented since 2019 for French
employees, representing 87.5% of the Group workforce. This agreement aims at providing guidance
for the use of IT and digital tools in line with the necessary respect of rest and holiday periods, as well
150
as with work-life balance. This agreement is communicated to every employee. Managers and
executives are expected to set an example and promoting good practices.
Protect the health and safety of our employees
The safety of the personnel and the management of the working conditions are fundamental for the
sustainable development of the Group.
The staff has the necessary clearances and training for using the equipment and for keeping up with
the health and safety requirements. Following negotiations with various agencies, the Group has
signed a medical insurance contract offering advantageous guarantees to its employees. All employees
also have access to a complementary insurance contract with extended guarantees, in the event of
long-term sick leave / disability or death.
A “single occupational risk assessment document”, which has been updated in 2020 with Covid-19
measures, summarizes the main rules of workplace health and safety that employees must follow and
presents the common rules applicable to all employees to allow them to evolve in satisfactory work
and safety conditions. This document is made available to all employees.
Upon hiring and during the integration pathway of a new employee, awareness of stress management
and psychosocial risks is considered. At the end of a period of one month, an informal intake report
gives the incoming employee the opportunity to express himself on the management of the volume of
work. A recruitment medical examination is organized for all staff. Subsequently, a medical
examination is organized every two years.
In 2021, the Group did not identify any work or commuting accidents. No occupational disease or
professional character and no permanent incapacity has been declared in 2021.
Absenteeism rate is the ratio between hours effectively worked by the entire staff of the Group and
the theorical hours on the same period (employees on permanent contract only).
Psychosocial risk signals
2021
2020
Absenteeism rate*
1,21%
1,82%
*Absenteeism rate is the ratio between hours effectively worked by the entire staff of the Group and the theorical hours on
the same period (employees on permanent contract only).
The Group’s HR depart plans to implement a well-being at work policy in 2022, which will include
warning signs of psychosocial risks, such as absenteeism.
2.5.6 Ensure effective governance practices
To execute its strategy, Poxel relies on an experienced Board of Directors and Management team and
has built an internal organization dedicated to corporate social responsibility (CSR) (See Section 2.4
Organizational structure and employees”). Poxel endeavors to act ethically in all its activities and to
create sustainable relationships with its vendors. The Group also applies the highest possible standards
in terms of data protection and IT security considering the nature of data it handles including patient
data.
2.5.6.1 Rely on an adequate governance structure
The Company is a French Société anonyme à Conseil d’administration - Public limited company with a
Board of Directors, where the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are separate.
The governance structure of the Company can be summarized as follows:
151
The CSR governance structure of the Group is described in Section 2.4.1 “Organizational structure and
employees”.
Board of Directors
The Company’s Board of Directors consists of eight members, of which three women. Six Directors are
independent, who are appointed by the General Assembly Meeting of the shareholders for a three-
years mandate. The Chairman of the Board is elected by the Board of Directors among its members.
The Board of Directors determines the direction of the Company’s business activities and oversees the
implementation thereof in accordance with the Company’s social interest and taking into account
social and environmental aspects of its activity.
The Board of Directors has set up six permanent specialized committees composed of Directors (Audit
Committee, Compensation Committee, Scientific Advisory Committee, Nominating & Corporate Social
Responsibility Committee, Business Development Committee, and Strategic Committee) to assist the
Board of Directors in its work.
In 2021, the Board of Directors of the Company met 7 times (compared to 9 times in 2020). The average
of the Directors’ attendance rate is 95.3% (compared to 97.1% in 2020).
A self-evaluation of the work of the Board of Directors is conducted annually through a detailed
questionnaire by the Nominating and CSR committee which makes recommendations thereafter to
improve the organization and functioning of the Board of Directors and its Committees. In 2021, this
self-evaluation resulted in a very satisfactory assessment of the functioning of the Board with 96%
positive answers overall (compared to 88% in 2020).
Chief Executive Officer, Executive Committee and Departments
The Chief Executive Officer is appointed by the Board of Directors and has the broadest powers to act
in any circumstances in the name of the Company. He exercises these powers within the limit of the
corporate purpose and subject to the powers that the law and the bylaws expressly attribute to
General Meetings of shareholders and to the Board of Directors and any limitations on the powers that
are imposed on him by the Board of Directors.
The Chief Executive Officer is assisted by an Executive Committee of ten people, of which 5 are women.
Members of the Executive Committee collectively have expertise covering the value chain necessary
for development of a new drug. All have held positions of high responsibility, and for the most part,
have key experience working in pharmaceutical companies with extensive experience in metabolic
diseases and rare disorders.
152
Nine departments manage the Company’s operations:
Science, Innovation and Scientific Communication Department;
Project Management Office, Non-Clinical & Manufacturing Department;
Clinical Development and Regulatory Affairs Department;
Japan Office;
Business Development and Investor Relations;
Finance and Administration Department;
Legal department;
Quality Assurance Department;
Human Resources Department.
In 2021, the Company strengthened its governance structure through:
the appointment of Mr. John W. Kozarich as independent Board member for a term of office
of three years. Mr. Kozarich brings over 40 years of experience in the biopharmaceutical
industry and academia to Poxel and will in particular provide the Board of Directors with its
expertise on scientific matters. He chairs the Scientific committee of the Board;
the appointment of Ms. Sylvie Bertrand as Vice President, Human Resources. Ms. Bertrand has
20 years of Human Resources experience in various industries and services. With this
appointment the head of the Human Resources department is now a member of the Executive
Committee of the Company;
the appointment of Mr. Quentin Durand, member of the Executive Committee, as Head of
Corporate Social Responsibility with the task to ensure the implementation and monitoring of
the CSR strategy and the coordination of the work of the cross department working group;
the creation of a Nominating and Corporate Social Responsibility committee within the Board
of Directors as a replacement for the Nominating and Governance committee. The Nominating
& Corporate Social Responsibility Committee is responsible to assist the Board of Directors on
all CSR matters.
The Group intends to maintain its governance structure unchanged in the near future as it believes it
constitutes a strong foundation and a key component of the Group’s ability to execute its strategy. In
2022, the Group intends to focus on the training of its Directors and members of its Executive
Committee in accordance with the recommendations of the MiddleNext code and in order to maintain
their expertise. The Group will implement a 3-year training plan for Directors which will include
sessions dedicated to the scientific aspects of the Company’s pipeline, competitive landscape,
applicable regulations, ethics and governance and CSR. Each Director will attend at least 4 days of
training over this 3-year period.
2.5.6.2 Act Ethically
Poxel believes that integrity and ethics are the basis of sustainable and successful development. As an
innovative company, Poxel is conducting its business in compliance with its core values everywhere it
operates in the world. At the center of these core value is Poxel’s commitment to actively seek and
develop new and innovative products that address important healthcare needs. Poxel places the
patients at the center of its focus. Poxel expects its employees to focus on enabling better patient
outcomes and places patient benefit and safety first while complying with all legal, regulatory or
internal requirements.
The Board of Poxel has established a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics as a reminder of the core
values and standards of Poxel’s Directors, officers, and employees in making ethical and legal decisions
when conducting Poxel's business and performing their day-to-day duties. The code was adopted by
the Board of Directors on November 16, 2018 and amended on March 26, 2020.
153
The goals of this code are to promote honest and ethical conduct, promote fair dealing practices, deter
wrongdoing among other things. This document guides the Company’s Directors, executive managers
and employees in their decisions taken to ensure that they are in line with the Company’s legal
obligations and fundamental values of ethics.
The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is built on the following core values, standards and
commitments:
Core Values
Standards of conduct
Commitments
Commitments towards
patients
Be dedicated to science
and innovation
Be loyal in doing business
Be ambitious and resilient
Be honest and transparent
Support diversity
Prevent conflict of interests Comply with all applicable
laws and regulations
Prevent insider trading
Comply with Environmental
Laws to minimize the
Ensure confidentiality of
information
Duty to advance Poxel’s
legitimate business
interests over personal
gains
environmental footprint of
Poxel
Fair competition
No Discrimination and
harassment
No bribery and corruption
Comply with antitrust and
competition laws
Promote gender equality
No Political contribution
using Poxel’s resources
Protection and Proper Use
of Poxel's Assets
Ensuring the maintenance
of accurate books and
records, financial integrity,
and filing of public reports
The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also provides for a whistleblowing procedure allowing
executive officers, Directors, employees or any other person to raise any potential concerns, questions
or reports regarding potential or actual violations of the code or rules or regulations involving
accounting, internal accounting controls, auditing or securities law matters. No whistleblowing
procedure was engaged in 2021 or 2020.
All employees have signed the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics upon implementation and/or
beginning service at Poxel and have agreed to comply with the code. They are asked, on a periodic
basis, to review and sign any updated version of this code.
The Company has implemented other policies to ensure the appropriate conduct of its business, such
as:
an inside information policy which reminds the Company’s Directors, executive managers and
employees of the rules applicable in stock exchange matters and explains the requirements
regarding the information they hold or may hold and what steps to take when they or
members of their family wish to acquire or dispose of the Company’s financial instruments;
a corporate disclosure policy which aims to provide consistent, full and fair public disclosure
of material information pertaining to the business of the Company, regardless of the nature of
such information, in accordance with applicable law;
a policy relating to the identification of transactions with related persons to prevent conflict
of interests. This policy formalizes the process implemented to identify the related persons
transactions as well as the evaluation of agreements entered into in the ordinary course of
business and on arms’ length terms. The Group determines on or before the execution date of
each related person transaction if such transaction falls under the scope of this policy and as
the case may be, if such related person transaction is deemed undertaken in the ordinary
course of business and entered into on arms’ length terms. The Audit Committee and the
154
Board of Directors shall be involved in such procedure, as the case may be. This policy is
reviewed each year by the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Audit Committee.
In order for employees to be familiar and to act in accordance with Poxel Code of Ethics and Conduct
and other policies, employees are trained every two years on ethical matters. Since all employees have
been trained on the code of ethics in 2020, the next training will take place in 2022.
In 2021, no material business ethics issue has been identified. The Group has no activities in countries
exposed to risks of corruption (assessed as countries with a “Corruption Perception Index” below 60
by Transparency International). To ensure the appropriate monitoring and handling of such issues in
the future, as the case may be, the Group has decided to implement a business ethics log to record
any potential issues related to the matters described above as well as their treatment. The Group will
also proactively monitor any need to update or amend its policies.
2.5.6.3 Create sustainable relationships with vendors
As a Group primarily focused on research and development activities, Poxel is involved in a significant
number of agreements with various vendors. These vendors can be Contract Development
Manufacturing Organizations (CDMO) or Contract Manufacturing Organization (CMO) as it relates to
the manufacturing of drug substance and drug product which will then be used in pre-clinical studies
and clinical trials, Contract Research Organization (CRO) for the conduct of the clinical trials or
preclinical studies (including toxicological’ ones), laboratories or several other service providers in
connection with Poxel’s research and development activities but also general and administrative
matters.
Poxel’s approach is to select and qualify these vendors as carefully as possible and to create sustainable
long-term relationships with them.
Selection process
For each project undertaken by Poxel several vendors are contacted. Selection criteria are based on
the supplier’s ability to meet the Group’s requirements, which may be related to expertise, quality
management system, project management, budget and timelines forecasts for services entrusted. The
Group takes into account the proximity of the vendor and endeavors to source services locally
whenever possible.
Procurements by country (in % of operating expenses)
Lyon
G&A
7%
R&D
0%
France (excl. Lyon)
Europe
Worldwide
41%
35%
17%
15%
58%
26%
The Group also requests to be provided with key certifications and mandatory accreditations held by
its vendors. In particular, as the Group is involved in the development of drug candidates, it is required
under applicable regulations to conduct preclinical studies on animals before being able to move to
clinical trials on human. Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry, toxicity
and formulation, as well as animal studies to assess potential safety and efficacy. Preclinical studies
involving animals follow a set of harmonized rules which aim at reducing the number of studies and
animals used for scientific purposes and encourage the development of alternative methods. Recourse
to animal models shall be used only when no other methods are available for the purposes of the
study, and shall demonstrate strict proportionality in terms of replacement, reduction and refinement
of the use of animals (so-called “3 Rs Principles”).
To protect biodiversity in the framework of carrying out such tests, the Group requires that its vendors
comply with strict safety rules and with the regulations applicable in the countries, where the studies
155
are carried out. In this context Poxel requires its relevant business partners to have AAALAC
accreditation (Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care) for Good
Laboratory Practices (GLP) studies.
The collaboration of the Group with its vendors is part Quality continuous improvement policy.
Vendors qualification process includes an initial qualification (by quality questionnaire or audit) and a
periodic re-qualification whose period depends on vendor criticity. In 2021, for the first time, Poxel
decided to include questions related to CSR practices in quality questionnaires. Certifications relevant
to assess vendors CSR policy were also requested.
Sustainability of business relationships in R&D
2021
CSR vendors questionnaires conducted
30
*20 responses received
Poxel applies a 45-day payment term with its vendors.
Quality Assurance
A Quality Assurance department, composed of 3 employees, independent from operational activities,
is responsible for all quality assurance including audit activities. This department is also supported by
external quality auditors who are experts in their fields.
The Quality Assurance Department ensures quality and regulatory compliance for all activities
performed by the Group (internally and with suppliers) to meet quality standards defined by key
stakeholders including health authorities. To attend this goal, the Quality Assurance department
develops a quality management system based on risk management approach. The Quality Assurance
Department supports the others department in the definition and follow up of operational and support
processes.
The development of a new drug candidate follows a very rigorous evaluation process, during which
the safety of use of the drug candidate is the primary concern for the company developing the product
and the regulatory authorities responsible for its evaluation. The Group is thus obliged to comply with
the standards in force “GxP” (Good Manufacturing Practice, Good Laboratory Practice, Good Clinical
Practice), as well as the additional regulations and guidances established by the authorities in charge
of evaluating these new drugs and protecting public health, such as the European Medicine Agency
(EMA), the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) in Japan, or the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) in the United States. All clinical activities are conducted in accordance with the
local regulations and recommendations of good clinical practice ICH-GCP (International Conference of
Harmonization) aiming at the harmonization of MA requirements between the United States, Japan
and the European Union.
The Group expects its sub-contractors to comply with these standards and to act in an ethical and
responsible manner. In general, all suppliers are also expected to comply with local legislation on
corporate social responsibility. In the course of its collaborations, Poxel regularly performs audits to
ensure this compliance. The audits carried out systematically lead to reports and action plans as
necessary.
Appropriate vendors accreditation is part of the initial and periodic qualification process. Since 2021,
other vendors certifications (related to quality / environment / animal welfare) are monitored in
addition to GxP accreditation.
156
Quality assurance
2021
60%
Percentage of accredited of certified vendors by and independent organism
Percentage of vendors with appropriate accreditation for GxP activities
100%
Percentage of vendors with at least one certification related to CSR (Environment or
animal welfare)*
17%
88%
Percentage of qualified vendors (as expected by internal qualification process)
*Calculation taking into account all R&D vendors active in 2021 (even those not having manufacturing or laboratory activities)
Starting 2022, Poxel will add a new set of criteria to its vendors selection process linked to CSR matters
and will then include a review of these criteria in quality audit of its vendors accordingly. The
proportion of vendors retained in accordance with these CSR criteria will be monitored.
2.5.6.4 Apply the highest possible standards of IT security and data protection
Data protection
In connection with its activities, including in connection with conducting clinical trials in the European
Union, the Group may collect, process, use or transfer personal information from individuals located
in the European Union.
Strict requirements on controllers and processors of personal data, including special protections for
"sensitive information" which includes health and genetic information of data subjects residing in the
EU (and or outside the EU) are imposed by the provisions of the General Data Protection Regulation
((EU) 2016/679), or the GDPR. More specifically, this legislation imposes requirements relating to (i)
having legal bases for processing personal information relating to identifiable individuals and (ii) to
ensuring transfer of such information outside of the European Economic Area, or EEA, including to the
United States or other regions that have not been deemed to offer "adequate" privacy protections,
providing details to those individuals regarding the processing of their personal information, keeping
personal information secure, having data processing agreements with third parties who process
personal information, responding to individuals’ requests to exercise their rights in respect of their
personal information, reporting security breaches involving personal data to the competent national
data protection authority and affected individuals, appointing data protection officers, conducting
data protection impact assessments and record-keeping.
In order to appropriately protect data, it processes and comply with applicable laws, Poxel has put in
place both human and technical resources. The Group implemented a detailed action plan to work in
compliance with the GDPR in all of its activities.
A data protection officer (DPO) has been appointed in 2019 with the responsibility to ensure the
Group’s compliance with the (GDPR) and assist operational teams on data and regulatory compliance
issues. The DPO, in close collaboration with the Group’s IT manager, is also responsible for the
implementation and maintenance of appropriate documentation required under the GDPR such as the
Group’s register, privacy impact assessments, methodology of reference, data protection agreements
and data transfer agreements as the case may be. The DPO, in collaboration with the Group’s IT
manager, is also responsible for ensuring the compliance of the Group’s website with the GDPR
requirements.
IT Security
Poxel implemented IT tools, as well as information and communication systems, including telephone
and computer equipment (desktop, laptop, phone and mobile, servers, messaging systems, etc.)
hardware and software, as well as IT and telecom networks. These IT resources are subject to an IT
Charter adopted by the Board of Directors in 2019 which defines the legal, ethical and security rules
applicable to their use. The access and/or use of the IT resources is subject to strict security, integrity,
availability, traceability, confidentiality rules.
157
In order to prevent the undue circulation of data that has not been made public, the number of people
having access to databases is reduced and controlled. The Group has implemented appropriate
measures, in particular by limiting the number of participants in meetings, by using code names for
transactions, by regularly checking computer access rights and by having the persons concerned under
strict confidentiality obligations. Access to these several types of data is protected by login parameters
(such as logins and passwords). These settings are strictly personal and the group's IT charter specifies
the confidentiality rules regarding access to IT resources. Data is stored in private cloud systems, only
persons whose functions or responsibilities justifying it are able to access data. The Group’s Data
Centers are set up in accordance with the “HDS” certification and the Good Security Practices, as strict
as ISO 27001. Each private cloud system include back-up plans (3 physical sites located at least more
than 10km apart from each other).
Poxel has been conducting IT audits since 2015. No intrusion flaws have ever been detected. However,
in 2020, several of the vendors the Group has relied on, in particular for the execution of its preclinical
studies and clinical trials, have been targeted by cyber-attacks. Due to their internal organization and
readiness, the consequences of such cyber-attacks did not lead to any material consequences for the
Group. Since 2021, the Group has implemented a cyber-security insurance to protect itself against the
consequences of potential cyber-attacks.
In order to ensure the reliability of its IT system, the Group regularly carries out cybersecurity audits.
Action plans are systematically put in place following the conclusions of the audits carried out.
Risk of cyber-attack
2021
2020
0
0
Number of attacks with direct consequences on IT system
Number of attacks attempts which required actions to ensure security,
but without consequences on IT system
1
1
>100 000
21*
N/A
3
Number common unsuccessful attacks (eg: phishing attempts)
Number of days of partial of total business interruption
*Mainly due to a fire in the facilities of the Group’s cloud services firm, the interruption was only partial and affected some of
the Group’s IT infrastructure without preventing the Group from maintaining its activities
In 2021, the Group implemented several trainings and awareness sessions on cybersecurity and GDPR.
The objective of this cybersecurity and data protection awareness program is to increase the skills of
employees by transmitting basic knowledge in the IT field as well as to implement good practices to
reduce the risk related to cybersecurity (e.g., use of computer equipment in the context of home office,
scenarios of hacking mailboxes, phishing etc).
Cybersecurity awareness
2021
2020
% of employees trained on IT security issues
100%
100%
In 2022, Poxel intends to precisely map its IT risks which will then be presented to the Executive
Committee and Board of Directors and may result in an action plan. A revision of the Group’s IT charter
is also ongoing notably to improve internal good practices in connection with cybersecurity. Finally,
the Group intends to implement a business continuity plan to avoid any material business interruption.
2.5.7 Limit the Group’s impact on the environment
While pursuing its mission to develop novel treatments for serious chronic diseases with metabolic
pathophysiology, Poxel’s goal is to limit its impact on the environment as much as possible.
As a research and development Group with no industrial facilities, Poxel’s direct impact on the
environment is relatively limited and consist mostly in greenhouse gas emissions. According to the
French Agence de la transition écologique (ADEME), greenhouse gas emissions can be split into the
following three categories:
158
Scope 1 – All Direct Emissions from the activities directly generated by the activities of an
organization or under its control. Including “combustion” on site such as gas boilers, fleet
vehicles and air-conditioning leaks as well as the upstream emissions linked to this
“combustion” (extraction, treatment, refining, transport and distribution);
Scope 2 – Indirect Emissions from electricity and heat purchased and used by the organization
as well as the upstream emissions linked to these electricity and heat consumption (incl.
electric mix of the country);
Scope 3 – All Other Indirect Emissions from activities of the organization, occurring from
sources that they do not own or control (incl. business travel, procurement, waste and water
etc) that occur in the value chain including both upstream and downstream emissions.
As of the date of this report the Group does not monitor its greenhouse gas for all three of these
categories. Especially, emissions falling into the Scope 3 are not precisely known. For this reason, Poxel
decided to engage in a carbon footprint assessment in 2022. The Group will take part to the “Diag
Décarbon’Action” proposed by the ADEME in collaboration with Bpifrance. The goal of this co-financed
initiative will be to measure the Group’s emission for the entire value chain (Scope 1, 2 and 3) and
elaborate an action plan to reduce emissions and energy consumption. The Group will report on the
result of this assessment.
2.5.7.1 Minimize Poxel’s Greenhouse gas emissions and limit pollutions
Greenhouse Gas
At this stage, Poxel’s activities do not include any direct industrial manufacturing or distribution, the
heavy use of raw materials, or significant discharges into the environment.
Its activities do not require the use of mains gas, nor specialty gases. The Group does not generate any
noise nuisance for the staff or the local population. The Group also estimates that the discharges into
the air related to its activity are not significant and have little impact on the air quality. The Group has
no environmental liabilities.
Energy and water consumption are limited to servicing IT tools (and other electrical facilities) and the
sanitary installations of the employees. The Group does not consume gas or oil. Therefore, the main
greenhouse gas emissions identified at the date of this report by the Group remain limited to:
Electricity Consumption
at the Group’s offices
(1)
Business Travels (2)
(Scope 3)
Manufacturing and
product
transportation (3)
Digital Pollution (4)
(Scope 3)
(Scope 2)
(Scope 3)
2021
2020
2021
2020
2021
**
2020
2021
2020
1.91 Teq*
1.63 Teq 3.96 Teq
115 Teq
**
0.66 Teq
0.42 Teq
*Carbon equivalent (as measured in metric tons based on ADEME conversion table)
** No data for 2021 and 2020
(1)
In Lyon, the Group has leased premises in a building certified BBC (Bâtiment Basse Consommation), rated
B for energy consumption (53.7 kWhPE/sq.m/year, almost class A, for which the limit is 50) and A for
159
greenhouse gas emissions (0.6 kg eq. CO2/sq.m/year). This building was recognized by the Prebat
(Program of Research on Energy in Buildings) in 2009. In 2021, electricity consumption was 22,236 kWh
for premises leased on the two floors of the building in Lyon (compared to 19,069 kWh in 2020). These
data correspond to electricity consumption on the basis of actual data for 2021 and 2020. The Group
does not monitor the electricity consumption of its offices in Burlington, Paris and Tokyo which were
deemed to be non-significant given the surface areas occupied.
The health situation related to Covid-19 has led to a significant reduction of business travels in 2021 and
2020. The Group expects that the activity on domestic and international travels will increase in the
future. In order to limit travel and its impact on the environment, the Group attempts to use video
conferencing and teleconferencing tools whenever possible. In 2021, the Group revised its Travel Policy
to include environmental criteria and limitations to business travels in an effort to be more effective from
an environmental standpoint and to limit its carbon footprint. The Group also intends to monitor home
to work travel in the future.
(2)
(3)
(4)
The Group generates GhG emissions through the manufacturing, packaging, transportation, use and
destruction of the active ingredients that are used in the pre-clinical and clinical studies. These activities
are performed by external vendors. The Group plans to start collecting information on the level of GhG
issuance generated by its manufacturing activities in 2022.
See Section 2.5.0 “Deploy a responsible digital approach”.
The Group generates little waste directly. It mainly generates administrative waste, paper, or office
consumables (printer cartridges). For office consumables, the Group has signed a contract for the
collection of this waste with a specific contractor in charge of recycling them. Special containers have
been installed in the offices in Lyon to collect paper, thin cardboard, plastic bottles, glass and coffee
pods.
Direct consomption and waste
Water (m3)
2021
119
2020
118
Paper consumption (sheets)
Others (kg)
39 000
74
36 000
49
The Group has also signed contracts with specialized service providers for the recovery of other used
consumables and the disposal of its archives. Printer consumables are collected directly by a service
provider. The Group also has a contract with a specialized provider for the disposal and recycling of
waste electric and electronic equipment.
In 2021, Poxel's recycling balance was 143.5kg of paper and cardboard, and 6.5kg of plastic bottles.
Poxel is committed to continue reducing its waste and other consumables in the near future as well as
to increase its recycling efforts.
2.5.7.2 Deploy a responsible digital approach
As a Group focused on research and development, one of the key aspects of Poxel’s pollution stems
from digital pollution through the purchase of active pharmaceutical ingredients, related external
manufacturing and use of IT infrastructure and digital devices.
IT equipment
To conduct its business Poxel has set up computer tools, information and communication systems
including telephone and computer equipment (fixed or portable computers, servers, messaging
systems, etc.) hardware or software, as well as computer and telecommunication networks. These IT
resources are subject to an IT Charter adopted by the Board of Directors in 2019 which defines the
legal, ethical and security rules applicable to their use.
In the context of remote work, specific equipment is provided to the employees (e.g., additional
computer screens, keyboards, mouse).
160
Each employee is provided with a computer equipment and telephone. The renewal of each
employee's equipment is carried out every 3 years, except for restricted use that would justify
extending the service life.
IT Equipment life-cycle
2021
2020
30%
0%
Share of re-used IT equipment after end of life cycle within the Group
The Group is currently adapting its policy to re-use computer hardware. While keeping a pool of
computers ready to be deployed in the event of a failure, Poxel intends to extend the life of its
employees’ equipment whenever possible and recondition its computers at the end of their life cycle
within the Group to make donations to associations, or to collaborators for a private need. In addition,
the Group plans to monitor the waste generated by its IT equipment and ensure its recycling as much
as possible.
Use of IT infrastructure
The Group uses video conferencing and teleconferencing tools, e-mails, dematerialized storage
systems and various information systems and software.
The weight of stored data amounted to approx. 10 000 Go for 2021 (compared to 6 400 Go for 2020).
In 2021, the Group redesigned its dematerialized storage systems in order to reduce the weight of
these data.
These IT resources are subject to an IT Charter adopted by the Board of Directors in 2019 which defines
the legal, ethical and security rules applicable to their use. The access and/or use of the IT resources is
subject to strict security, integrity, availability, traceability, confidentiality rules.
The Group also adopted the electronic signature to limit its paper consumption.
The Group does not monitor any additional data related to digital pollution at this stage and plans to
further investigate the impact of its digital activities as well as their level of GhG issuance in the future.
The IT charter will be revised in 2022 to incorporate good practices in the use of IT equipment and limit
digital pollution. This charter will be signed by all employees and an awareness campaign will be
implemented. In the near future, the Group intends to better monitor its digital pollution and is
committed to limiting it as much as possible.
2.5.8 Methodology note
This report presents CSR data concerning Poxel (the “Company”) and its Japanese and American
subsidiaries for fiscal 2020 & 2021 (together with Poxel the “Group”). Financial year 2020 covers the
period between January 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020. Financial year 2021 covers the period
between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2021. The Group has two geographical locations in France:
its head office in Lyon and an office in Paris, as well as two international offices: one in Tokyo, Japan
st
nd
since September 1 , 2018, and one in Burlington, USA since January 2 , 2019. Unless specified in the
report, the data presented aggregates information relating to these four sites.
All the indicators are monitored by the financial controllers, Vice President, Human Resources and the
Chief Financial Officer. The employment indicators are established based on a non-accounting
summary, supported by employment data arising from salaries and personnel files.
Concerning environmental indicators, non-accounting monitoring is performed. Based on this
monitoring, actual electricity consumption is calculated based on consumption billed. We used a CO2
equivalent emission factor of around 72g CO2/kWh and 15g CO2/Mo based on the ADEME carbon
accounting v7.1. Information was collected by the Head of CSR. The information was checked by the
Chief Legal Officer & Head of CSR.
161
3 FINANCIAL INFORMATION
3.1
Management discussion and analysis
The reader is invited to read the following information relative to the financial position and the results
of the Group in conjunction with the Universal Registration Document as a whole and, in particular,
the Group’s consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS since January 1, 2015.
The consolidated financial statements cover the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2020 and
2021.
The comments on the financial statements presented in Section 3.1 “Management discussion and
analysis” of the Universal Registration Document are established solely on the basis of the IFRS
consolidated financial statements presented in Section 3.2 “Consolidated Financial Statements for the
years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020” of this Universal Registration Document.
3.1.1 Overview
Poxel is an international clinical-stage biopharmaceutical Group focused on the development of novel
treatments for metabolic diseases, including type 2 diabetes and liver diseases, such as non-alcoholic
steatohepatitis (NASH) and rare disorders (AMN/ALD). Poxel has clinical and earlier-stage programs
from its adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activator and deuterium-
modified thiazolidinedione (dTZD) platforms targeting chronic and rare metabolic diseases. Poxel’s
first-in-class lead product, TWYMEEG® (Imeglimin), that targets mitochondrial dysfunction, has been
approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan. Since its incorporation on March 11, 2009, the
Group has devoted substantially all of its financial resources to research and development efforts. On
June 23, 2021, the Group and Sumitomo Pharma announced that a new drug application for TWYMEEG
Tablets 500mg (International Nonproprietary Name (INN): Imeglimin hydrochloride), for the treatment
of type 2 diabetes, was approved in Japan. Japan is the first country in the world to approve Imeglimin.
The Group has funded its operations to date primarily through private and public offerings of its equity
securities, debt financing arrangements, upfront and milestone payments, Research Tax Credit (Crédit
Impôt Recherche) reimbursements and other government subsidies.
Since inception, the Group has incurred significant operating losses. Its ability to generate revenue
sufficient to achieve profitability will depend significantly upon the successful development, regulatory
approval and eventual commercialization of its drug candidates. The Group had a net loss of €23.8
million and €31.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 respectively.
In 2019, the Group has obtained additional funding in the form of a bond loan from IPF Partners. The
financing consists of three separate bond tranches: EUR 6.5 million, EUR 10 million and EUR 13.5
million, for a total amount of up to EUR 30 million, subject to the occurrence of contractually defined
triggering events. The three tranches were drawn down in November 2019, March 2020 and June 2021
successively. A debt covenant is attached to the contract.
In May 2020, the Group announced a successful private placement with both U.S and European
investors and raised €17.7 million.
In July 2020, the Group received a JPY 500 million (EUR 4.1 million) milestone payment from Sumitomo
Pharma following the submission of the Imeglimin J-NDA. The approval in Japan also riggered a JPY
1.75 billion (approximately €13.2 million) additional milestone payment that was recognized as
revenue in June 2021 and paid in July 2021.
In October 2020, The Group received the approvals from BNP Paribas, Bpifrance and CIC Lyonnaise de
Banque for a € 6 million non-dilutive financing in the form of a French Government Guarantee loan.
Each loan had an initial term of one-year, with a five-year extension option.
Page 162
In July 2021, addendums to the original contracts were executed to exercise this extension option, and
formalize a 2-year interest-only period followed by a 4-year repayment period.
In April 2019, the Company was notified that Merck Serono had initiated an arbitral proceeding in
order to resolve a difference in interpretation in connection with the application of the MS Agreement
to the Roivant License Agreement. On 18 February 2021, an Arbitral Tribunal rendered a “Final Award”
concluding the ICC arbitration between the Company and Merck Serono (See section 2.1.11 “Legal
Proceedings”).
The Group had cash and cash equivalents of €32.3 million as of December 31, 2021. Financial net debt
amounted to €2,571 thousand at December 31, 2021. Financial liabilities of the Group (lease and
derivative debt excluded) were €34.9 million as of December 31, 2021, reflecting its commitments to
French Government loan (PGE) and IPF debt.
3.1.2 Presentation of financial information
The Group’s consolidated financial statements included in this Universal Registration Document have
been prepared in accordance with IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or
IASB. In addition, due to the listing of its ordinary shares on the regulated market of Euronext Paris and
in accordance with European Union Regulation No 297/2008 of March 11, 2008, the Group also
prepares its financial statements in accordance with IFRS as issued by the IASB and as endorsed by the
EU.
3.1.3 Principal Factors Affecting the Group’s Results of Operations
The following factors have affected, and the Group expects will continue to affect, its results of
operations:
3.1.3.1 Licensing and Partnership Agreements
The Group has entered into development, licensing partnerships and licensing agreements with
various pharmaceutical companies, pursuant to which have received upfront payments and are
entitled to milestone payments upon achieving pre-determined development and regulatory events
and to royalty payments and sales-based milestones after the commercialization of its drug candidates.
Its main partnerships and collaboration agreements are summarized below. All U.S. dollar amounts
which have been received in cash are converted into euros as at the then-prevailing exchange rate
(i.e., the spot rate at the moment of the transaction).
3.1.3.1.1 Merck Serono Assignment and Licensing Agreement
The Group entered into the MS Agreement as part of the spin-off of Serono’s research and
development activities in the cardiometabolic field. The MS agreement was amended on July 30, 2009
to include an additional patent for which Merck granted a license to us (see Section 2.3 “Merck Serono
agreement”).
Merck Serono is entitled to the following compensation:
The Group will pay Merck Serono a fixed 8% royalty based on the net sales of Imeglimin,
independent of the level of net sales of the products covered by the assigned patents, and (at the
lower end of the range) a low single digit rate for other products; and
an additional percentage of certain revenue from any partnering agreement relating to the drug
candidates covered by the assigned patents, at a low double-digit rate near the bottom of the range
for Imeglimin. For other compounds, if the Group enters into a partnering agreement, the Group
would owe a percentage of certain partnering revenues with respect to products covered by the
assigned patents depending on the product and its stage of development when it is partnered.
Page 163
3.1.3.1.2 Sumitomo Pharma Collaboration Agreement for Imeglimin in Type 2 Diabetes
On October 30, 2017, the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement for the co-development and
marketing of Imeglimin. Under this agreement, Sumitomo Pharma has an exclusive, royalty-bearing
license, with the right to grant sublicenses, to develop, manufacture, use, import and register
Imeglimin solely for the purpose of commercializing the product in Japan, China and eleven other
countries in Southeast Asia, for all human and veterinary indications, including type 2 diabetes.
Upon signing the Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement, Sumitomo Pharma made an initial non-
refundable payment to the Group in an amount of ¥4,750 million (approximately $42 million). In July
2020, the Group received a JPY 500 million (EUR 4.1 million) milestone payment from Sumitomo
Pharma following the submission of the Imeglimin J-NDA.
On June 23, 2021, the Group and Sumitomo Pharma announced that a new drug application for
TWYMEEG® Tablets 500mg (International Nonproprietary Name (INN): Imeglimin hydrochloride), for
the treatment of type 2 diabetes, was approved in Japan. The approval in Japan triggered a JPY 1.75
billion (approximately €13.2 million) milestone payment to Poxel from Sumitomo Pharma. In
accordance with the Sumitomo Pharma license agreement, Poxel is entitled to receive escalating
royalties of 8 - 18% on net sales of TWYMEEG and sales-based payments of up to JPY 26.5 billion
(approximately EUR 200 million), please see Section 2.3.2 “Sumitomo Pharma License Agreement”.
3.1.3.1.3 Roivant License Agreement for Imeglimin in Type 2 Diabetes
On February 9, 2018, the Company signed the Roivant License Agreement for the development and
marketing of Imeglimin in the United States, Europe and other countries not covered by the existing
partnership in Asia between the Company and Sumitomo Pharma (see Section 2.3.2 “Sumitomo
Pharma License Agreement").
On November 20, 2020, the Company and Roivant announced that Roivant had conducted a strategic
review and had decided not to move forward with the development of Imeglimin in the United States,
Europe and other countries not covered by the existing partnership in Asia between the Company and
Sumitomo Pharma. This decision was not based on any efficacy, safety or other data generated through
the partnership.
The Roivant License Agreement was effectively terminated January 31, 2021, and Roivant returned to
the Company all rights to Imeglimin, as well as all data, materials, and information, including FDA
regulatory filings, related to the program. Roivant is not entitled to any payment from the Company as
part of the return of the program.
3.1.3.1.4 DeuteRx Partnership Agreement
On August 29, 2018, the Group entered into the DeuteRx Agreement, with respect to DRX-065 (now
PXL065) and a portfolio of other potential deuterated drug candidates for the treatment of rare and
specialty metabolic diseases (although the Group owns the patents and have the rights with respect
to all indications for PXL065 and this portfolio).
As consideration under the DeuteRx Agreement, the Group paid DeuteRx a non-refundable upfront
payment of €6.8 million and issued 1,290,000 of new ordinary shares to DeuteRx. Under the DeuteRx
Agreement, the Group is also obligated to pay DeuteRx, in cash or in shares (valued based on a daily
volume weighted average of actual trading prices for a specified period), as the case may be, amounts
tied to attaining certain development and regulatory objectives for products under the acquired
programs, such as the completion of certain phases of clinical trials and the receipt of marketing
approvals in various countries. The Group is further required to make cash payments to DeuteRx linked
to sales targets and low single-digit royalty payments based on net sales (subject to reduction in certain
circumstances) (see Section 2.3.3 “DeuteRx agreement”).
Page 164
3.1.3.1.5 Enyo Pharma License Agreement
In May 2015, the Group entered into a license agreement with Enyo Pharma S.A.S. (“Enyo”), for its
farnesoid X receptor, or FXR, agonist program. Enyo has launched the Phase 2 development program
for hepatitis B and is studying its development potential for NASH. In July, Enyo announced positive
results for Vonafexor, in a Phase 2a study in NASH and topline interim results from two ongoing Phase
2a studies in chronic hepatitis B patients.
The Enyo license agreement did not have any material impact on the Group’s results of operations in
2020 or 2021. The Group is potentially entitled to royalties pursuant to the agreement.
3.1.3.2 Research and Development Activities
The Group engages in substantial research and development efforts to develop potential treatments
for type 2 diabetes and other metabolic diseases such as non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and rare
disorders (AMN/ALD). Its research and development efforts are focused on its existing drug
candidates, PXL770 and PXL065.
Research and development activities are central to its business. As drug candidates in later stages of
clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical
development due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials, the Group expects
that its research and development costs will increase in the foreseeable future. For the year ended
December 31, 2021 and the year ended December 31, 2020, 77% and 80%, respectively, of its
operating expenses were for research and development purposes.
The Group expects to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable
future:
continues to invest in the preclinical and clinical development of its drug candidates,
including PXL770, PXL065;
continues preclinical development of its other programs;
pursues partnership or licensing arrangements, including any milestone or royalty payments
due in connection with such arrangements;
maintains, expand and protect its intellectual property portfolio.
The Group cannot determine with certainty the duration and completion costs of the current or future
clinical trials of its drug candidates or to what extent the Group will generate revenue from the
commercialization and sale of its drug candidates that obtained regulatory approval. The Group may
not succeed in achieving regulatory approval for its drug candidates that are still in development. The
duration, costs and timing of clinical trials and development of its drug candidates will depend on a
change of factors, including:
the scope, progress, outcome and expenses of its clinical trials and other research and
development activities, including establishing an appropriate safety profile with IND-directed
studies;
successful patient enrollment in, and the initiation and completion of, clinical trials;
the timing, receipt and terms of any marketing approvals from applicable regulatory
authorities;
establishing commercial manufacturing capabilities or making arrangements with third-party
manufacturers;
the expense of filing, prosecuting, maintain, defending and enforcing patent claims and other
intellectual property rights;
significant and changing government regulation;
Page 165
launching commercial sales of its drug candidates, if and when approved, whether alone or
in collaboration with others;
maintaining a continued acceptable safety profile of the drug candidates following approval;
the ability to market, commercialize and achieve market acceptance for Imeglimin in the
territories that are not covered by the Sumitomo Pharma license agreement, PXL770, PXL065
or any other drug candidate that the Group may develop in the future; and
significant competition and rapidly changing technologies within the biopharmaceutical
industry.
The Group may not succeed in achieving regulatory approval for its drug candidates that are still in
development. The Group may obtain unexpected results from its clinical trials. The Group may elect to
discontinue, delay or modify clinical trials of some drug candidates or focus on others. A change in the
outcome of any of these change with respect to the development of drug candidates that the Group
is developing itself or with its collaborators could mean a significant change in the costs and timing
associated with the development of such drug candidates. For example, if the EMA or the FDA or other
regulatory authority were to require the Group to conduct non-clinical and clinical studies beyond
those which the Group currently anticipates will be required for the completion of clinical
development, or if the Group experiences significant delays in enrollment in any clinical trials, the
Group could be required to spend significant additional financial resources and time on the completion
of clinical development.
At this stage, the Group has not generated yet any significant revenue from sales of its drug candidates.
At December 31, 2021, JPY 1.5 million royalties (EUR 58 thousand) have been reported following
Imeglimin commercial launch in Japan on Sept 16 2021, corresponding to 8% of Imeglimin net sales in
Japan.
Therefore, the Group anticipates that it will need to raise additional capital, prior to completing clinical
development of its drug candidates. Until such time that it can generate substantial revenues from
sales of products, the Group expects to finance its operating activities through a combination of equity
offerings, debt financings, government or other third-party funding and partnerships, and licensing
arrangements.
However, the Group may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such arrangements when
needed on favorable terms, or at all, which would have a negative impact on its financial condition and
could force the Group to delay, limit, reduce or terminate its development programs or
commercialization efforts or grant to others rights to develop or market drug candidates that the
Group would otherwise prefer to develop and market itself. Failure to receive additional funding could
cause the Group to cease operations, in part or in full.
3.1.4 Components of Its Results of Operations
3.1.4.1 Sources of Revenue
The Group’s revenue in its continuing operations to date have consisted of upfront payments in
relation with research and development services, license fees, milestone payments and royalties
received in connection with its partnership and collaboration agreements.
Partnership agreements with its commercial partners for research and development activities
generally include non-refundable, upfront fees, milestone payments, the receipt of which is dependent
upon the achievement of certain clinical, regulatory or commercial milestones; license fees; and
royalties on sales.
The Group has generated revenue from product sales for the first time in 2021. Royalties have been
reported following Imeglimin commercial launch in Japan on Sept 16 2021, corresponding to 8% of
Imeglimin net sales in Japan. In accordance with the Sumitomo Pharma license agreement, the Group
Page 166
is entitled to receive escalating royalties of 8 - 18% on net sales of TWYMEEG and sales-based payments
of up to JPY 26.5 billion (approximately EUR 200 million). Based on the current forecast, the Group
expects to receive 8% royalties on TWYMEEG net sales in Japan through the Sumitomo Pharma fiscal
year 2022 (April 2022 to March 2023).
The Group’s ability to generate other product revenue will depend upon its ability to successfully
develop, obtain regulatory approval and commercialize Imeglimin in territories that are not covered
by the Sumitomo Pharma license agreement, PXL770, PXL065 and its other drug candidates. Because
of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with product development and regulatory
approval, the Group is unable to predict the amount, timing or whether the Group will be able to obtain
revenue from its drug candidates that are still under development.
3.1.4.2 Components of Operating Expenses
Since inception, its operating expenses have consisted primarily of expenses resulting from its research
and development activities and general and administrative expenses.
The Group expects its operating expenses to remain substantial given its ongoing and planned
activities, particularly as the Group continues the development of its drug candidates, expand its
pipeline and invest in its proprietary discovery platform.
Its operating expenses may change substantially from period to period mainly driven by the initiation
of future clinical trials, the timing of enrollment of patients in clinical trials and other research and
development activities.
3.1.4.2.1 Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of:
expenses associated with third-party contractors and academic institutions involved in
preclinical studies or clinical trials for PXL770 and PXL065;
personnel expenses, including salaries, benefits and share-based compensation, for its 33
employees engaged in scientific research and development functions as well as conference
and travel expenses;
professional fees, including fees related to maintenance of its intellectual property portfolio;
laboratories and allocated facilities expenses.
Research and development expenses are expensed as incurred.
Expenses for certain activities, such as manufacturing and preclinical studies and clinical trials, are
generally recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using
information and data provided to the Group by its vendors and collaborators.
The Group typically uses its employee, consultant and infrastructure resources across its development
programs and the Group does not track or allocate these internal expenses to any particular drug
candidates or programs. The Group does track outsourced development expenses by drug candidate
or preclinical program. The following table summarizes its outsourced research and development
expenses by drug candidate and preclinical program for the periods presented:
(In € thousands)
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
Imeglimin
PXL770
481
4 068
1 410
8 033
7 533
PXL065
11 759
Page 167
Research and development expenses in 2020 and 2021 mostly reflect the Group development plan in
NASH: for PXL 770, Phase 2a trial was completed at the end of 2020 and for PXL065 Phase 2 trial
(DESTINY) started in Q3 2020 and is still ongoing in 2021.
3.1.4.2.2 Subsidies
As a Group that carries extensive research and development activities, the Group has benefited from
grants and research and development incentives from certain governmental agencies. These grants
and research and development incentives aimed to partly reimburse approved expenditures incurred
in its research and development efforts.
Its subsidies consisted of government grants from the European Research Agency and the French
National Research Agency that are accounted for as a reduction of the related expenses in the Group’s
statement of income in accordance with IAS 20 “Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of
Government Assistance”.
3.1.4.2.3 Research Tax Credit
The Research Tax Credit is granted to companies by the French tax authorities in order to encourage
them to conduct technical and scientific research. Companies demonstrating that they have expenses
that meet the required criteria, including research expenses located in France or, since January 1, 2005,
within the EU or in another state that is a party to the agreement in the European Economic Area
(the ”EEA”) that has concluded a tax treaty with France that contains an administrative assistance
clause, receive a tax credit which can be used against the payment of the corporate tax due the fiscal
year in which the expenses were incurred and during the next three fiscal years, or, as applicable, can
be reimbursed for the excess portion. The expenditures taken into account for the calculation of the
Research Tax Credit involve only research expenses.
The main characteristics of the Research Tax Credit are the following:
the Research Tax Credit results in a cash inflow to the Company from the tax authorities, i.e.,
it is used to offset the payment of corporate tax or is paid directly to the Company for the
portion that remains unused the year after the date of its record as a tax credit in the income
statement;
a company’s corporate income tax liability does not limit the amount of the Research Tax
Credit — a comp
any that does not pay any corporate income tax can request direct cash payment of the
research tax credit the year following its record in the income statement; and
the Research Tax Credit is not included in the determination of the corporate income tax.
As a result, the Company has concluded that the Research Tax Credit meets the definition of a
government grant as defined in IAS 20, Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of
Government Assistance. As no research and development expenditure is capitalized before obtaining
marketing authorization, the Research Tax Credit related to its research programs has been classified
as other operating income within operating income in its consolidated statement of profit or loss.
Since its inception, the Company has been granted the Research Tax Credit and collected it in cash the
year after the year the tax credit is recorded in its financial statements, pursuant to the application of
community tax rules for small and medium enterprises in compliance with the current regulations. The
Company received the reimbursement for the 2020 Research Tax Credit in the amount of €2.4 million
in 2021.
Since its inception through December 31, 2021, the Company has received €34.4 million in non-
refundable subsidies, mainly from the Research Tax Credit (€33.8 million). For the year ended
December 31, 2021, the Group recorded Research Tax Credit of €2.3 million, as a result of research
Page 168
and development expenses incurred during the period, as compared to subsidies of €2.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2020, mostly reflecting Tax Credit of €2.4 million.
3.1.4.2.4 Other Subsidies and Conditional Advances
The Company has received financial assistance from BPI France, the French public investment bank,
and other governmental organizations in connection with the development of its drug candidates. BPI
France’s mission is to provide assistance and support to emerging French compagnies to facilitate the
development and commercialization of innovative technologies. Such funding, in the form of non-
refundable subsidies and conditional advances, is intended to finance its research and development
efforts and the recruitment of specific personnel.
Non-refundable subsidies are recognized over the duration of the funded project. Funds are
recognized in other income in its consolidated statement of profit or loss in the fiscal year when there
is a reasonable assurance that the subsidies will be received.
Funds received from BPIFrance in the form of conditional advances were recognized as financial
liabilities, as the Company was obligated to reimburse BPIFrance for such conditional advances in
cash based on a repayment schedule.
3.1.4.2.5 General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, including salaries,
benefits and share-based compensation, for the Group’s employees other than those engaged in
research and development functions, as well as travel expenses and entertainment expenses. General
and administrative expenses also include fees for professional services, including audit, information
technology, finance, accounting, recruitment and legal as well as business development and public
relations expenses, allocated facilities and insurance expenses.
3.1.4.2.6 Financial Income (Loss), Net
The financial result includes all changes in fair value of the debts recorded at fair value through profit
or loss, expenses related to its financing, interests on debts, income related to the interest payments
received and foreign exchange gains or losses.
Page 169
3.1.5 Results of Operations
3.1.5.1 Comparisons for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021
The table below sets forth the Group’s financial results for the years ended December 31, 2020 and
December 31, 2021:
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
Adjusted
Change
Change %
In thousands €
Revenue
13,397
-59
6,806
6,592
97%
COGS
-59
6,533
1,740
-212
Gross margin
13,339
-27,479
2,305
-10,628
-22,463
-2,950
868
6,806
-29,219
2,517
57%
-6%
Research and development expenses
Subsidies
-8%
General and administrative expenses
Operating income (loss)
Financial expenses
Financial income
-9,923
-29,819
-1,727
1,722
-705
7%
7,356
-1,223
-854
-25%
70%
-50%
-140%
-34%
-25%
-93%
-25%
Exchange gain (loss)
Financial income (loss)
Net income (loss) before taxes
Income taxes
785
-1,970
-1,975
-31,794
-36
2,755
678
-1,297
-23,760
-2
8,034
34
Net income (loss)
-23,763
-31,830
8,068
3.1.5.1.1 Revenue
The total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2021 was €13.4 million, as compared to €6.8
million for the year ended December 31, 2020, an increase of €6.6 million, or 97%. The total revenue
comprises revenue from its license and partnership agreements. At December 31, 2021, revenue
mainly includes a JPY 1,750 million (EUR 13.2 million) milestone payment that Poxel has received from
Sumitomo Pharma in July 2021 following the approval of Imeglimin in Japan, which has been
completed on June 23, 2021 as well as first royalties received in 2021 following Imeglimin commercial
launch on September 16, 2021(EUR 58 thousand).
The table below sets forth the third-party revenue, by contract, for the years ended December 31,
2020 and 2021.
(In € thousands)
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
Change
6,590
Change %
97%
Sumitomo Pharma Contract
Other Contract
13,377
20
6,787
18
2
-1
12%
-100%
97%
Others
1
Revenue
13,397
6,806
6,591
All the Group’s contracts are accounted for in accordance with IFRS 15 Revenue from contracts with
customers.
Page 170
For the Sumitomo Pharma License, the agreement provides for regulatory and sales-based milestone
payments and for the payment of royalties based on sales of Imeglimin in the allotted territories. On
July, 2021, Poxel received PY 1,750 million (EUR 13,2 million) milestone payment from Sumitomo
Pharma following the approval of Imeglimin in Japan. The Group has generated revenue from product
sales for the first time in 2021. Royalties have been reported for the amount of JPY 1.5 million (EUR 58
thousand) following Imeglimin commercial launch in Japan on Sept 16 2021.
The accounting treatment of this contract is described in note 18 to the Group's audited consolidated
financial statements in Section 3.2.6 “Notes to the consolidated financial statements”.
3.1.5.1.2 Operating Expenses
The Group’s operating expenses comprise research and development expenses, research tax credit
and general and administrative expenses. The table below sets forth the Group’s operating expenses
for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021.
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
Adjusted
Change
Change %
(In € thousands)
Research and development expenses
Subsidies
-27,479
2,305
-29,219
2,517
1,740
-6%
-8%
7%
-212
-705
823
General and administrative expenses
Total operating expenses
-10,628
-35,802
-9,923
-36,625
-2%
The Group's operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 2021 were €35.8 million, as
compared to €36.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, a decrease of €0.8 million or 2%.
Research and development expenses decreased by €1.7 million, or -6%, to €27.5 million for the year
ended December 31, 2021, as compared to €29.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Research and development expenses mainly related to studies and clinical trials for PXL770 and
PXL065. These expenses remained globally constant over the 2020 and 2021 periods. The decrease in
research and development expenses mainly relates to non-recurring costs incurred in 2020 (as a result
of the Merck Serono arbitration) and tax adjustment recorded in 2020. Personnel expenses increased
slightly over the period (+€0.2 million compared to December 31, 2020).
Research and development expenses represented 77% and 80% of total operating expenses in 2021
and 2020, respectively.
Subsidies
Subsidies amounted to €2.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 and €2.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2020. These subsidies are mainly related to the Research Tax Credit.
General and administrative expenses
Total general and administrative expenses increased by €0.7 million, or +7%, to €10.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2021, as compared to €9.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
This increase is primarily due to a €0.5 million increase in share-based payments and €0.4 million
increase in insurance costs.
3.1.5.1.3 Financial income (loss)
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Group recognized financial loss of -€1.3 million, as
compared to financial loss of -€2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. The financial loss in
2021 is mainly composed of :
Page 171
-
-
-
financial expenses, which mostly correspond to:
o
o
interests on IPF debt (€2,463 thousand in 2021 compared to €1,556 thousand in 2020);
interests paid to Merck in connection with the arbitration decision (€297 thousand in
2021);
financial income corresponding to the change in fair value of derivative instruments (an
income of €820 thousand in 2021 compared to an income of €1,278 thousand in 2020) and
income from financial investments (€48 thousand in 2021 compared to €382 thousand in
2020);
foreign currency exchange gains and losses (an income of €785 thousand compared to a loss
of €1,970 thousand in 2020).
3.1.5.1.4 Income taxes
The Group has not recognized deferred tax assets in its statement of financial position. As of December
31, 2021, the amount of accumulated tax loss carryforwards since its inception was €179 million. The
Group estimates that, to date, the probability of taxable profits being available does not allow
recognition of all or part of the balance of its tax loss carried forward.
The tax rate applicable to the Group for its profit, excluding long-term capital gains, is the rate in force
in France, 26.5%. The rate under French legislation application for future years is 25% as of 2022. The
tax rate applicable to the Group for its long-term capital gains and intellectual property-related income
is the rate in force in France, in 2020 and 2021 i.e 10%.
3.1.5.1.5 Net income (loss)
As a result of the foregoing, the Group’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2021 was -€23.8
million, as compared to a net loss of -€31.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2020.
3.1.6 Liquidity and Capital Resources
Since inception, the Group has incurred significant operating losses and expect to continue to incur
significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future.
The Group had cash and cash equivalents of €32.3 million as of December 31, 2021. Financial net debt
amounted to €2,571 thousand at December 31, 2021. Financial liabilities of the Group (lease and
derivative debt excluded) were €34.9 million as of December 31, 2021, reflecting its commitments to
French Government loan (PGE) and IPF debt.
3.1.6.1 Sources of Funds
The Group has funded its operations to date primarily through private and public offerings of its equity
securities, collaboration agreements, debt financing arrangements, Research Tax Credits and other
government subsidies and loan. The Group has generated revenue from product sales for the first
time in 2021. Royalties have been reported following Imeglimin commercial launch in Japan on Sept
16 2021. From inception through the date of this Universal Registration Document, the Group has
received an aggregate of €301.4 million from:
equity financing arrangements for €142.7 million, mainly including €64.2 million in gross
proceeds from private placements to U.S. and European investors following its initial public
offering and listing on Euronext Paris, €26.8 million in gross proceeds from its February 2015
initial public offering and listing on Euronext Paris, €12 million in gross proceeds from a
private placement to Roivant, and €34.1 million in gross proceeds from private placements
conducted prior to February 2015, as well as the proceeds from the exercise of options and
instruments;
€80.8 million in upfront and milestone payments from its partners, including €52.8 million
from its partnership with Sumitomo Pharma and €28 million ($35 million) from its
development and license agreement with Roivant;
Page 172
other sources of capital totaling €42.2 million, consisting mainly of €33.8 million of Research
Tax Credit and €7.2 million of initial research and development funding from Merck Serono
in 2009.
bond loan from IPF Partners for €30 million.
French Government Guarantee Loan (PGE loan) for €6.0 million in October 2020.
In November 2019, the Group entered into a Subscription Agreement with IPF Partners to secure
additional funding in the form of three separate bond tranches up to a total borrowing amount of €30
million and related warrants to purchase up to €4.5 million of its ordinary shares.
The Group borrowed €6.5 million under the first tranche and issued warrants for IPF to purchase
264,587 ordinary shares with an exercise price of €7.37 in November 2019.
In March 2020, the Group borrowed €10.0 million under the second tranche and issued warrants for
IPF to purchase 209,967 ordinary shares with an exercise price of €7.14.
In June 2021, following the Marketing approval of Imeglimin in Japan, the Group borrowed €13.5
million under the third and final tranche of IPF Venture Loan and issued warrants to purchase 156,250
ordinary shares with an exercise price of €6.72.
The exercise price of the warrants attached to the three tranches could be revised if certain conditions
are met.
The maturity of the first two tranches is five years from drawdown and the third tranche is four years
from drawdown with a quarterly redemption starting from the 18th month after drawdown for
tranches A and B and 12th month for tranches C.
The bonds bear interest rate of EURIBOR 3M + 6.5% for the first two tranches and EURIBOR 3M + 6.0%
for the third tranche, plus an additional 2% PIK interest paid on all three tranches. The bonds contain
customary financial and security interest covenants.
Customary security interests are granted to the benefit of the bondholders, including a pledge on
certain intellectual property rights should the cash position is less than the sum of the consolidated
debt service of the Group and the amount of cash required to be spent by the Group as part of its
operations, in each case for the following 9-month period.
Furthermore, the Group is subject to cash covenants (please refer to 3.1.8.3 Section below). A breach
of any of those covenants would constitute an event of default. In such a situation, the debt would
become immediately payable.
In October 2020, the Group has received financing approval from BNP Paribas, BPIfrance and CIC
Lyonnaise de Banque for a total of €6.0 million in the form of state-guaranteed loans (Prêts Garantis
par l’Etat, or PGE in France) in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Each individual lender has
provided a loan of € 2 million. The French government will guarantee 90% of the amount due in the
case of default. Each loan has an initial term of one-year, with a five-year extension option. In July
2021, addendums to the original contracts were executed to exercise this extension option, and
formalize a 2-year interest-only period followed by a 4-year repayment period.
The Group anticipates that it will need to raise additional capital, prior to completing clinical
development of its drug candidates. Until such time that it can generate substantial revenues from
sales of products, the Group expects to continue to finance its operating activities through a
combination of equity offerings, debt financings, government or other third-party funding and
collaborations, and licensing arrangements.
However, the Group may be unable to raise additional funds or enter into such arrangements when
needed on favorable terms, or at all, which would have a negative impact on its financial condition and
could force the Group to delay, limit, reduce or terminate its development programs or
Page 173
commercialization efforts or grant to others rights to develop or market drug candidates that the
Group would otherwise prefer to develop and market itself. Failure to receive additional funding could
cause the Group to cease operations, in part or in full. Its present and future funding requirements will
depend on many factors, including, among other things:
the size, progress, timing and completion of its clinical trials for any current or future drug
candidates, including Imeglimin in US, UE, territories not covered by the Sumitomo Pharma
license agreement PXL770 and PXL065;
the number of potential new drug candidates that it identifies and develops;
the costs involved in filing patent applications and maintaining and enforcing patents or
defending against claims of infringement raised by third parties;
the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approval for its drug candidates and any
delays it may encounter as a result of evolving regulatory requirements or adverse results
with respect to any of these drug candidates; and
the amount of revenues, if any, that may be derived either directly, or in the form of royalty
payments from its current partnership agreements regarding Imeglimin and from any future
potential partnership agreements regarding Imeglimin, PXL770 and PXL065, or relating to
any of its other drug candidates.
3.1.6.2 Cash Flows comparisons for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021
The following table sets forth a summary of the Group cash flows for the years ended December 31,
2020 and 2021 :
(In € thousands)
December 31, 2021
December 31, 2020
Change
Change %
Cash flows from (used in) in operating activities
Cash flows from (used in) in investing activities
Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
-16,893
-42
-25,749
52
8,856
-94
-34%
-179%
-69%
9,025
-7,915
28,712
3,016
-19,687
-10,930
-362%
3.1.6.2.1 Cash flows from (used in) operating activities
Its cash flows used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 amounted to
- €16.9 million, a decrease of €8.8 million compared to the previous year, mainly related to the cash
received from Sumitomo Pharma for the TWYMEEG approval milestone (€13.2 million) in 2021,
compared to a €4.1 million milestone payment in 2020.
Its cash flows used in operating activities in 2021 primarily reflect the funding of its clinical
developments and ongoing activities.
3.1.6.2.2 Cash flows from (used in) investing activities
The Group uses subcontractors for many of its research activities, and it only in-sources controls and
projects management functions. Accordingly, its operations do not typically require significant cash
investments.
Its cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2021 were €-0.04 million
and its cash flows from investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020 were €0.05 million.
Its cash flows from investing activities in 2021 mainly reflect acquisitions in equipment and interests
received from bank deposits.
Page 174
3.1.6.2.3 Cash flows from (used in) financing activities
The Group’s cash flows from financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2021 were 9 million
and its cash flows from financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2020 were €28.7 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, cash flows from financing activities were primarily due to cash
received from:
bond loan with IPF Partners for a net an amount of €11.3 million,
Interests paid in connection with the IPF loan -€1.9 million.
For the year ended December 31, 2020, cash flows from financing activities were primarily due to cash
received from bond loan with IPF Partners in an amount of €9.9 million, share capital increase, net of
expenses for €16.8 million, PGE loan in an amount of €6.0 million and repayment in the financing of
Roivant’s development program for -€2.8 million.
3.1.6.3 Capital Expenditures
The Group’s operations generally require little investment in tangible assets because most of the
manufacturing and research activities are outsourced to third parties. Its offices in France (Lyon and
Paris), Japan and the United States, along with certain computer equipment, are leased under
operating lease agreements. See Section 3.1.8.4 “Real Estate Leases”. The Group accounts for its
payments for these items as operating expenses and financial expenses in its statement of loss.
3.1.7 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Group does not have any relationship with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships,
including entities sometimes referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities that were
established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually
narrow or limited purposes.
The Group does not engage in off-balance sheet financing arrangements. In addition, the Group does
not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts. The Group therefore believes
that it is not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if the
Group had engaged in these relationships.
3.1.8 Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes its contractual cash obligations and other commercial commitments
at December 31, 2021:
In € (thousands)
Less than 1 year
1 to 5 years
Total
Operating leases (1)
419
520
939
939
Total financial commitments
419
520
(1)
Real estate leases related to the Group’s offices in France, Japan and the United States
3.1.8.1 Commitment in Respect of the Agreement with Merck Serono
In accordance with the MS Agreement, Merck Serono transferred certain patents and granted the
Group a license for other patents and know-how for the research, development and marketing of
pharmaceutical products. This license is exclusive and covers a list of 25 molecules by program, each
by its selection.
Page 175
Merck Serono is entitled to the following compensation:
a fixed 8% royalty based on the net sales of Imeglimin, independent of the level of net sales
of the products covered by the assigned patents, and (at the lower end of the range) a low
single digit rate for other products; and
an additional percentage of certain revenue from any partnering agreement relating to the
drug candidates covered by the assigned patents, at a low double-digit rate near the bottom
of the range for Imeglimin. For other compounds, if the Group enters into a partnering
agreement, it would owe a percentage of certain partnering revenues with respect to
products covered by the assigned patents depending on the product and its stage of
development when it is partnered.
3.1.8.2 Obligation under the DeuteRx Contract
On August 29, 2018, the Group entered into the DeuteRx Agreement with respect to DRX-065 (now
PXL065) and a portfolio of other potential deuterated drug-candidates for the treatment of rare and
specialty metabolic diseases (although the Group owns the patents and have the rights with respect
to all indications for PXL065 and this portfolio), (the PXL065 Products). Pursuant to the DeuteRx
Agreement, DeuteRx sold, transferred and assigned to the Group all industrial and intellectual property
rights and interests in DeuteRx’s know-how and patent rights useful for the development, manufacture
or commercialization of the PXL065 Products.
Under the DeuteRx Agreement, the Group is also obliged to pay DeuteRx, in cash or in shares (valued
based on a daily volume weighted average of actual trading prices for a specified period), as the case
may be, amounts tied to attaining certain development and regulatory objectives for products under
the acquired programs, such as the completion of certain phases of clinical study and the receipt of
marketing approvals in various countries. The Group is further required to make cash payments to
DeuteRx linked to sales targets and low single-digit royalty payments based on net sales (subject to
reduction in certain circumstances).
3.1.8.3 Obligation under the IPF debt
In November 2019, the Group entered into a Subscription Agreement with IPF Partners to secure
additional funding in the form of three separate bond tranches up to a total borrowing amount of €30
million and related warrants to purchase up to €4.5 million of its ordinary shares.
The bonds contain customary financial and security interest covenants.
Customary security interests are granted to the benefit of the bondholders, including a pledge on
certain intellectual property rights should the cash position is less than the sum of the consolidated
debt service of the Group and the amount of cash required to be spent by the Group as part of its
operations, in each case for the following 9-month period.
Furthermore, the Group is subject to the following covenants at consolidated level:
Gearing ratio: The Group should maintain a Gearing Ratio lower than 50%. The Gearing Ratio
is measured by the ratio of total net debt to the market capitalization value of the Group.
Cash management: The Group should maintain a minimum cash position of the highest of
ten million euros and the sum of the consolidated debt service of the Group and the amount
of cash required to be spent by the Group as part of its operations, in each case for the
following 6-month period.
A breach of any of those covenants would constitute an event of default. In such a situation, the debt
would become immediately payable.
Page 176
3.1.8.4 Real Estate Leases
In November 2017, the Group entered into a commercial lease allowing the Group to enlarge the
surface of its headquarters offices. This lease started on April 1, 2018. Its term is six complete and
consecutive years, until June 30, 2024. The Group has the possibility to provide notice to terminate the
lease only every three years.
In September 2019, a new commercial lease was concluded, under the same conditions as the previous
ones, to enlarge the office space in Lyon.
The Group also leases two offices in Paris for 6 and 8 -month term that is renewable annually.
In Japan, the Group has leased its premises in Tokyo from January 15, 2020 for a period of two
years, that was renewed for one year on January 15, 2022 as well as an additional office for a one-
year period from March 1, 2021.
In the United States, on December 31, 2018 the Group began a lease for its premises in Burlington,
Massachusetts, for a period of five years, subject to early termination rights after three years.
According to IFRS 16, the Group recognized a lease debt of €1.5 million as of December 31, 2021. This
lease debt was €1.9 million as of December 31, 2020.
3.1.8.5 Roivant Contract
The obligation to participate in the financing of Roivant’s development program has been treated as a
financial liability, which was fully reimbursed in 2020 first half (see note 14.5 on the Group audited
consolidated financial statements as of year ended December 31, 2020 included elsewhere in this
Universal Registration Document).
3.1.8.6 Commitments for post-employment benefits
No post-employment benefit is granted to the members of the board of directors.
Under his management agreement entered into with the Company, Mr. Thomas Kuhn (CEO) is owed
compensation related to forced departure without cause and a non-compete clause as set below:
(i)
a compensation of one year of his fixed compensation at the date of the termination.
(ii)
if not paid yet, the earned variable compensation of the calendar year preceding the one
in which the termination occurs.
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
the earned variable compensation of the calendar year in which the termination occurs,
in proportion of his effective presence.
an amount equal to 100% of the variable compensation for the year in which the
termination date occurs, based on his fixed compensation at the date of the termination.
a non-competition clause with a monthly compensation, during 18 months, of 50% of the
average gross remuneration he received over the course of the 12 months preceding the
termination
3.1.9 Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The Group’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS as issued by IASB and endorsed
by the EU. The preparation of its consolidated financial statements requires the Group to make
estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, costs and
expenses.
The Group bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and other factors that it
believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. The Group evaluates its estimates and
assumptions on an ongoing basis. Its actual results may differ significantly from these estimates in line
with assumptions or different conditions.
Page 177
The main estimates or significant judgments made by the Group’s management impact the
following items:
recognition of revenues, notably for the estimate of the transaction price and of the choice
of the method of allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations;
allocation of share subscription warrants, stock-options, performance shares or warrants to
employees, executives and external providers notably on the evaluation methods of the
instruments;
IPF debt and derivative liability, notably on the evaluation of the derivative liability;
assessment of risk of impairment of the DeuteRx intangible asset; and
Agreements are analyzed according to IFRS 15. The Group applies the five-step model prescribed by
this standard: (1) identify the customer contract; (2) identify the contract’s performance obligation;
(3) determine the transaction price; (4) allocate the transaction price to the performance obligation
and (5) recognize revenue when or as a performance obligation is satisfied. See ‘‘— Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates”.
Under IFRS 15, revenue is recognized when the Group satisfies a performance obligation by
transferring a promised asset or service to a customer. A service is considered an asset for IFRS 15
even though it is not recognized as an asset by the customer, as it is simultaneously received and
consumed and therefore expensed as transferred. An asset is transferred when the customer
obtains control of the asset or service.
In the application of IFRS 15, the Group made significant judgments in the following areas:
Assessing whether the estimate of variable consideration should be constrained
Under IFRS 15, the estimated amount of variable consideration should be included in the transaction
price only to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal of revenue will not occur
when the contingency is subsequently resolved. The Group is entitled to future development and
regulatory milestone payments, which are contingent upon successful outcome of clinical trials and
obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities. The Group has considered that such
payments do not meet the highly probable threshold required by IFRS 15 and should therefore be
excluded from the transaction price. This is because the contingency relates to factors that are outside
of its influence and historical experience has no predictive value. Accordingly, no revenue has been
accrued for these contingent payments.
Assessing whether variable consideration should be allocated to a single specific performance
obligation
A variable consideration should be allocated directly to a specific performance obligation if the
variability relates to the entity’s efforts in satisfying the specific performance obligation, or to a specific
outcome from satisfying that performance obligation, and only if such an allocation is consistent with
the overall allocation objective in the standard. The Group is entitled to reimbursement of external
subcontracting costs incurred in providing the R&D service to Sumitomo Pharma. It has allocated such
cost reimbursement entirely to the R&D service. The Group believes it is consistent with the overall
allocation objective, after taking in account all fixed and variable consideration and all performance
obligations in the contract.
Estimating the standalone selling price of each performance obligation
When a contract includes multiple performance obligations, the transaction price must be allocated to
the performance in proportion to their respective standalone selling prices (except in the specific
circumstances discussed above). The standalone selling price is the price at which the Group would
have sold the asset or service in a separate transaction. For example, the Group has allocated the fixed
portion of the Sumitomo Pharma transaction price (which includes the upfront payment) to the license
Page 178
and the service in proportion to their standalone selling prices. Such standalone selling prices are not
directly observable and have been estimated as follows:
for the service component, the standalone selling price is determined as the expected cost
(including both internal and subcontracted costs) plus a margin consistent with what would
be expected by an independent CRO for similar services (clinical trials).
For the license component, the standalone service price is estimated using a discounted
cash flow, or DCF, approach. Inputs in the DCF estimate include: probability of success of
Phase 3 clinical trials and regulatory approval, drug product sales volumes and price, royalty
rates, upfront payments and milestone payments, and discount rate. These inputs are
corroborated by observable data, including: stock market analyst reports who disclosed
assumptions used in performing a DCF valuation of its Asian franchise, independent survey
of historical clinical development success rates, independent market study for Imeglimin
drug, the terms of the agreement between Poxel and Roivant (which, as compared to the
Sumitomo Pharma deal, is a separate license sale for same drug, same indication and
different territory) and information publicly released by other biotech companies about the
terms of their licensing agreements.
New pronouncements issued by the IASB and applicable from 2021 or later
The Group adopted the following standards, amendments and interpretations:
-
Amendments Phase 2 (mandatory as of January 1, 2021) to IFRS 9, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16 -
Interest Rate Benchmark Reform.
-
Amendment to IFRS 16 - Leases Covid-19-Related Rent Concessions beyond June 30, 2021.
The adoption of these standards did not have any significant impact on the Group’s results or financial
position.
The Group did not elect for early application of the following new standards, amendments and
interpretations, which were adopted but not mandatory as of December 31, 2021:
-
IFRS 17 Insurance Contracts issued on 18 May 2017 including Amendments to IFRS 17 issued
on 25 June 2020 and whose application is for annual reporting periods beginning on or after
January 1, 2023;
-
Amendments to IAS 1 Presentation of Financial Statements: Classification of Liabilities as
Current or Non-current and Classification of Assets as Current or Non-current - Deferral of
Effective Date issued on January 23, 2020 and July 15, 2020 respectively and whose application
is for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2023;
-
Amendments to IFRS 3 Business Combinations, IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment, IAS 37
Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets, Annual Improvements 2018-2020, all
issued May 14, 2020 and whose application is for annual reporting periods beginning on or
after January 1, 2022;
The Group has assessed the impacts following the first application of these new standards and does
not anticipate any material impact on its financial statements. See Note 2 to its 2021 audited
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Universal Registration Document for a
description of its critical accounting, significant judgement and estimates and other significant
accounting policies.
Changes in accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared applying the change in accounting policy
reported in the adjusted 2020 consolidated financial statements and related to the application of the
IFRS Interpretations Committee agenda decision date April 20, 2021 “Attributing Benefit to Periods of
Service (IAS 19 Employee Benefits). See Section 3.2 “Consolidated Financial Statements for the years
Page 179
ended December 31, 2021 and 2020” Note 2 “Change in accounting policies” of this Universal
Registration Document.
3.1.10 Share-Based Compensation
The Group has granted instruments to members of its board of directors, as well as certain employees
and executives, in the form of: (i) warrants (BSAs); (ii) founders’ share warrants (BSPCEs); (iii) Stock
Options; and (iv) Performance shares.
The following table summarizes data relating to these instruments as of December 31, 2021:
Maximum
Number of
instruments instruments
issued
Number of
Fair Value of Fair Value of
SHARE BASED
COMPENSATION
number of
shares to be
issued
Strike
price
the underlying
share
the
instruments
Duration
Volatility
outstanding
BSA - Various
grants between
2013 and 2021
€4.23 to
€13.57
€2.04 to
€6.77
€4.0 to
€10.77
43% to
57%
975,282
904,907
945,282
270,834
10 years
10 years
10 years
BSPCE - Various
grants between
2012 and 2017
€2.72 to
€5.58
€3.20 to
€8.45
53% to
55%
€2.72 to €5.58
342,500
242,334
Stock Options -
Various grants
between 2016 and
2021
€5.16 to
€12.55
€2.25 to
€5.88
€5.16 to
€12.55
43% to
53%
2,122,000
1,375,000
1,375,000
Performance
shares - Various
grants between
2018 and 2021
1,408,350
987,878
987,878
-
-
-
-
-
3.1.10.1 Valuation Methods of the BSAs, Stock Options and BSPCEs
The fair value of instruments was determined using the Black & Scholes evaluation model. The
modalities of the assessment used in estimating the fair value of the options are specified below:
for the rights attributed before its listing on Euronext Paris, the share price used is equal to
the price of subscription of investors or by reference to internal valuations; for the rights
attributed after its listing on Euronext Paris, the share price used is equal to the share price
on the date of award;
the risk-free rate is determined from the average life of instruments; and
the volatility is measured from fluctuations in the share price of the Company over a
specified period of time. The volatility of peer companies is also analyzed in order to
examine if their volatility is coherent with one of the Company.
3.1.10.2 Valuation Methods of Performance Shares
The fair value of options subject to market condition was determined using the Monte Carlo model.
The modalities of the assessment used in estimating the fair value of the performance shares are
specified below:
the share price used is equal to the share price on the allocation date;
the risk-free rate is determined from the average life of instruments; and
the volatility is determined on the basis of a sample of listed companies in the biotechnology
sector, on the date of subscription of the instruments and on a period equivalent to the
duration of the life of the option.
For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Group recorded total share-based compensation expenses
of €4.6 million (2.6 million as “Research and development” expense and €2.0 million as “General and
Page 180
administrative” expense), as compared to €2.8 million (€1.3 million as “Research and development”
expense and €1.5 million as “General and administrative” expense) for the year ended December 31,
2020.
(In € thousands, except number of
shares)
Cumulative
2021 expense at
Number of
instruments
outstanding
IFRS 2 Cumulative
cost of expense at
Cumulative
expense at
Dec 31, 2020
2020
expense
expense
Dec 31,
2021
the plan
opening
Total BSA
904,907
242,334
3,308
1,492
6,878
7,794
3,308
1,445
2,651
782
0
39
3,308
1,485
3,911
2,277
0
0
3,308
1,485
5,016
5,775
Total BSPCE
Total Stock Options
Total Performance shares
1,375,000
987,878
1,260
1,495
1,105
3,498
Grant total
3,510,119
19,472
8,186
2,794
10,981
4,603
15,584
3.1.11 Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure about Market Risk
The Group primary exposure to market risk is interest rate sensitivity, which is affected by changes in
the general level of interest rates, particularly because its investments, including cash equivalents, are
in the form of a money market fund and marketable securities.
The Group is also exposed to market risk related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates:
It contracts with vendors that are located in the United States, the United Kingdom,
Singapore and Japan and certain invoices are denominated in foreign currencies.
the revenue from its licensing agreement with Sumitomo Pharma in Japan is in JPY.
The Group is subject to fluctuations in foreign currency rates in connection with these contracts and
licensing agreement.
At this stage, the Group has not adopted any recurring mechanism of coverage to protect its activity
against currency fluctuations. From time to time, the Group may nevertheless subscribe currency term
accounts and forward sale in order to cover a commitment or future revenue in currency as described
above. The Group may consider in the future using a suitable policy to cover exchange risks in a more
significant manner if needed.
Inflation generally affects the Group by increasing its cost of labor and clinical trial costs. The Group
does not believe that inflation had a material effect on its business, financial condition or results of
operations during the years ended December, 2020 and 2021.
3.1.12 Profit forecasts or estimates
The Group does not communicate any profit forecast or estimates.
Page 181
3.2
Consolidated Financial Statements for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020
3.2.1 Statement of financial position
POXEL
Notes
Dec 31, 2021
K€
Dec 31, 2020
Adjusted*
Statements of financial position
K€
ASSETS
Intangible assets
6
7
16,631
16,642
Property, plant and equipment
Other non-current financial assets
Deferred tax assets
Total non-current assets
Trade receivables
1,716
206
-
2,224
246
-
8
22
18,552
50
19,113
281
9
9
Other receivables
3,999
-
5,480
-
Current tax asset
22
10
Cash and cash equivalents
32,287
36,337
54,889
40,203
45,964
65,077
Total current assets
Total Assets
* Cf. Note 2 "change in accounting policies" related to the application of IFRIC decision dated to April 20, 2021
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 182
POXEL
Notes
Dec 31, 2021
K€
Dec 31, 2020
Adjusted*
Statements of financial position
K€
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Share capital
12
12
574
570
Premiums related to the share capital
Retained earnings (deficit)
Net income (loss)
24,780
6,338
-23,763
277
145,849
-87,756
-31,831
232
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Total shareholder's equity
Non-current liabilities
8,206
27,065
Employee benefits
15
14
16
370
30,094
318
395
20,986
172
Non-current financial liabilities
Provisions
Total non-current liabilities
Current liabilities
30,782
21,554
Current financial liabilities
Derivative liabilities
14
14
5,046
153
2,866
691
Provisions
16
-
2,409
8,362
2,117
14
Trade payables
17.1
17.2
17.3
8,417
2,270
15
Tax and employee-related payables
Contract liabilities
Total current liabilities
Total Liabilities and Shareholder's equity
15,901
54,889
16,459
65,077
* Cf. Note 2 "change in accounting policies" related to the application of IFRIC decision dated to April 20, 2021
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 183
3.2.2 Consolidated statement of income (loss)
POXEL
Notes
Dec 31, 2021
K€
Dec 31, 2020
Adjusted*
K€
Income statement
Revenue
18
13,397
6,806
Cost of sales
-59
13,339
-27,479
2,305
-
6,806
Gross Margin
Research and development expenses
Subsidies
19.1
19.1
19.2
-29,219
2,517
General and administrative expenses
Operating income (loss)
-10,627
-22,463
-9,923
-29,819
Financial expenses
Financial income
21
21
21
21
-2,950
868
-1,727
1,722
Exchange gains (losses)
Financial income (loss)
Net income (loss) before taxes
Income tax
785
-1,970
-1,975
-31,794
-36
-1,297
-23,760
-2
22
Net income
-23,763
-31,831
Earnings/(loss) per share (€/share)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Adjusted*
28,642,334
(0.83)
27,528,783
Weighted average number of shares in circulation
Basic Earnings (loss) per share (€/share)
Diluted Earnings (loss) per share (€/share)
(1.16)
(1.16)
(0.83)
* Cf. Note 2 "change in accounting policies" related to the application of IFRIC decision dated to April 20, 2021
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 184
3.2.3 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss)
POXEL - IFRS
Notes
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Adjusted*
Statement of comprehensive income (loss)
K€
K€
Net income (loss) of the year
-23,763
123
-79
-31,831
-49
Actuarial gains (losses) from defined benefit plans (non-recyclable)
Currency translation adjustment (recyclable)
Tax effect associated with these elements
Other comprehensive income (loss) (net of tax)
Total comprehensive income (loss)
15
272
-
-
44
223
-23,719
-31,607
* Cf. Note 2 "change in accounting policies" related to the application of IFRIC decision dated to April 20, 2021
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the consolidated financial statements
Page 185
3.2.4 Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity
Other
comprehe
nsive
income
(loss)
Premiums
Capital
Number of
shares
Share
Capital
related to
the share
capital
Retained
earnings
Total Equity
Changes in Shareholders' equity
K€
K€
K€
K€
K€
As of January 1st, 2020 - adjusted*
Net income (loss) for 2020
26,054,763
521
129,024
-90,307
9
39,247
-31,831
223
-31 831
Other comprehensive income (loss)
223
223
Total Comprehensive income (loss)
Issuance of shares
-31,831
-31,607
16,645
65
2,358,483
82,277
47
2
16,597
65
Issuance of warrants
Exercise of share warrants
Share base payments
Treasury shares
162
164
2,794
-243
2,794
-243
As of December 31, 2020 - adjusted*
Net income (loss) for 2021
28,495,523
570
232
27,065
-23,763
44
-23,763
Other comprehensive income (loss)
44
44
Total Comprehensive income (loss)
Allocation
28,495,523
-23,763
-23,719
-
208,169
4
226
65
230
65
Exercise of share warrants (note 4.1)
Issuance of warrants
Share base payments
4,603
-39
4,603
-39
Treasury shares
As of December 31, 2021
28,703,692
574
24,780
-17,424
277
8,206
Actuarial gains
(losses) from
defined
Currency
Tax effects
associated
translation
adjustment
(recyclable)
Total
benefit plans with these
(non
elements
recyclable)
As of December 31, 2019, Adjusted*
-10
20
9
223
232
Other comprehensive income (loss), adjusted
272
-49
As of December 31, 2020, Adjusted*
262
-29
As of December 31, 2020, Adjusted*
Other comprehensive income (loss)
As of December 31, 2021
262
-79
-29
123
94
232
44
183
277
* Cf. Note 2 "change in accounting policies" related to the application of IFRIC decision dated to April 20, 2021
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 186
145,849
-119,587
-121,360
121,360
3.2.5 Consolidated statement of cash flows
POXEL
Notes
Dec 31, 2021
K€
Dec 31, 2020
Adjusted*
Statement of cash flows
K€
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss) for the period
Elimination of amortization of intangible assets
Elimination of depreciation of property, plant and equipment
Provisions booked
Reversal of provisions
Expenses associated with share-based payments
Interests expenses
Interests income
Change in IPF derivative liability fair value
Effect of unwinding the discount related to IPF Debt
Effect of unwinding the discount related to PGE debt
US loan non-cash profit
-23,763
33
-31,831
17
6
7
523
416
534
15-16
16
2,658
-143
2,794
1,283
-333
-1,278
336
-2,582
4,603
2,444
-48
-820
402
13
14.1
14.1
14.4
14.5
107
-106
-78
-
Cash flows from operating activities
before change in working capital requirement
Trade receivables (net of impairment of trade receivables)
Other receivables
Trade payables
Tax and social security liabilities
Contract liabilities
-18,791
-26,040
9
9
17.1
17.2
17.3
231
1,487
53
125
-
6,312
3,627
-8,043
-3
-1,602
Other creditors and other liabilities
2
-
Changes in working capital requirements
1,898
292
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Acquisitions of intangible assets
Acquisitions of property, plant and equipment
Interests received
Other cash flows from investing activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
-16,893
-25,749
6
7
-21
-28
47
-41
-42
-46
-235
345
-12
52
8
Share capital increase, including premium, net of expenses (1)
Subscription of share warrants
Interests paid
Roivant contract debt
IPF debt net of expenses
12
12
230
65
-1,925
-
11,322
-
16,808
65
-1,083
-2,782
9,850
6,000
106
287
-142
-398
28,712
-
14.1
14.4
14.5
14.1
14.2
14.3
PGE debt
US loan
-
-
Capitalized interests
Repayment of loans and conditional advances
Repayment of the lease debt
-232
-436
9,025
-4
Cash flows from financing activities
Impact of foreign currency exchange fluctuations
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the opening date
(including short-term bank overdrafts)
Cash and cash equivalents as of the closing date
(including short-term bank overdrafts)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
-7,915
3,016
40,203
37,187
32,287
40,203
-7,915
3,016
* Cf. Note 2 "change in accounting policies" related to the application of IFRIC decision dated to April 20, 2021
The accompanying notes form an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Page 187
3.2.6 Notes to the consolidated financial statements
Note 1: General information about the Group
The accompanying consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2020 and 2021 and related
notes, or the Consolidated Financial Statements, present the operations of the Group. Each of these
years has a duration of twelve months covering the period from 1 January to 31 December.
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared applying the change in accounting
treatment of the pension liability according to IFRC Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) agenda decision,
presented in note 2 - Changes in accounting policies.
1.1 Information on the Group and its business
Incorporated in March 2009 as a result of a Merck Serono spin-off of its anti-diabetic drug candidates
portfolio, Poxel (hereinafter referred to as “Poxel” and together with its subsidiaries, referred to as
the “Group”) is a French joint stock company (société anonyme) governed by French law and has its
registered office located at 259/261 Avenue Jean Jaurès, Immeuble le Sunway, 69007 Lyon, France  
(register Number at the company’s house: 510 970 817 RCS de LYON). The Group is developing
innovative treatments for severe chronic serious diseases, including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
(NASH) and rare disorders (AMN/ALD).
Except for the year in which it was incorporated and for 2018, the Group has incurred losses each year.
These losses result from internal and external research and development expenses, particularly related
to the performance of numerous preclinical and clinical trials, mainly in the context of the development
of Imeglimin. In October 2017, the Group signed a first strategic partnership agreement with Sumitomo
Pharma for the development and commercialization of Imeglimin, a drug candidate for the treatment
of type 2 diabetes, in Japan, China and eleven other developing countries in Asia. The Group has
obtained additional funding in the form of a bond loan from IPF Partners. The financing consists of
three separate bond tranches: EUR 6.5 million, EUR 10 million and EUR 13.5 million, for a total amount
of up to EUR 30 million, subject to the achievement of objectives contractually defined. The three
tranches were drawn down in November 2019, March 2020 and June 2021 successively. A debt
covenant is attached to the contract.
The Group’s future operations are highly dependent on a combination of factors, including: (i) the
success of its research and development programs; (ii) the continuation of the partnership agreements
entered into by the Group, and the amount of royalties received from these agreements (iii) securing
regulatory approvals and market access of the Group’s drug candidates; (iv) the timely and successful
completion of additional funding initiatives; and (v) the development of competitive therapies by other
biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. As a result, the Group is and should continue, in the
short to mid-term, to be financed through partnerships agreements for the development and
commercialization of its drug candidates and through the issuance of new equity or debt instruments.
1.2 Date of authorization of issuance
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the responsibility of management of
the Group and were approved and authorized for issuance by the board of directors on March 22nd,
2022. The consolidated financial statements will be submitted to the approval of the shareholders'
meeting on June 21st.
Page 188
Note 2: Basis of preparation
Except for share and per share amounts, the consolidated financial statements are presented in
thousands of euros. Amounts are rounded up or down the nearest whole number for the calculation
of certain financial data and other information contained in these accounts. Accordingly, the total
amounts presented in certain tables may not be the exact sum of the preceding figures.
Statements of compliance
The consolidated financial statements cover the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2020 and
2021.
In accordance with Regulation No.1606/2002 of the European Parliament and Council of July 19, 2002
on the application of international accounting standards, Poxel has presented its consolidated financial
statements in accordance with IFRS since January 1, 2015. The term “IFRS” refers collectively to
international accounting and financial reporting standards (IASs and IFRSs) and to interpretations of
the Interpretations Committees (SIC and IFRIC) with mandatory application as of December 31, 2021.
The consolidated financial statements of Poxel as of December 31, 2021 have been prepared in
compliance with IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and with IFRS
as endorsed by the European Union as of December 31, 2021 with the exception of the change in
accounting method described below.
The Company adopted the following standards, amendments and interpretations:
-
Amendments Phase 2 (mandatory as of January 1, 2021) to IFRS 9, IFRS 7, IFRS 4 and IFRS 16 -
Interest Rate Benchmark Reform.
-
Amendment to IFRS 16 - Leases Covid-19-Related Rent Concessions beyond June 30, 2021.
The adoption of these standards did not have any significant impact on the Company’s results or
financial position. The standards and interpretations that are optionally applicable to the Company as
of December 31, 2021 were not applied in advance.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements are as follows:
-
-
-
-
-
-
Amendments to IAS 1 - Classification of liabilities as current or non-current;
Amendments to IAS 16 - Property, Plant and Equipment - Proceeds before intended use;
Amendments to IAS 37 - Onerous contracts - cost of fulfilling a contract;
Amendments to IAS 1 - Disclosure of Accounting policies;
Amendments to IAS 8 - Definition of Accounting Estimates;
Annual Improvements 2018-2020.
The Group has assessed the impacts following the first application of these new standards and does
not anticipate any material impact on its financial statements.
Changes in accounting policies
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared applying the change in accounting policy
reported in the adjusted 2020 consolidated financial statements and related to the application of the
IFRS Interpretations Committee agenda decision date April 20, 2021 “Attributing Benefit to Periods of
Service (IAS 19 Employee Benefits).
In the previously reported financial statements, the method used consisted of measuring the
commitment and then recognize the expense on a straight-line basis over the employee's career within
the company. The commitment then corresponded to a pro rata of the rights acquired by the employee
at the time of retirement.
The IFRS Interpretation Committee’s agenda decision has to be applied when:
Page 189
-
-
The granting of rights is conditional on presence in the company at the time of retirement
(with loss of all rights in the event of early departure),
The rights depend on seniority, but are capped after a certain number of years of seniority,
with the cap occurring, at least for some employees, well before retirement.
Company applies the Pharmaceutical Industry” collective agreement (“Convention collective nationale
de l’industrie pharmaceutique”), which cap the pension rights after 30 years of employment.
Through its decision, the IFRIC agenda decision considers that, as long as, on the one hand, no rights
are acquired in the event of departure before retirement age and, on the other hand, rights are caped
after a certain number of years of service, the retirement benefit should be spread over the last 30
years before the retirement date that gives rights to those benefits.
The change in accounting policy was recorded retrospectively, resulting in an adjustment to the
previously reported financial statements for fiscal year 2020.
The adjustments corresponds to the provision for pension are summarized below :
(Amounts in K€)
As reported
375
IFRIC Adjustment
Adjusted
As of January 1st, 2020
Service cost
(106)
(27)
(1)
270
74
2
101
3
Interest cost
Actuarial gains and losses
As at December 31, 2020
102
581
(53)
(186)
49
395
Historical cost convention
The financial statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis, except for the following:
-
-
certain financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments, if any) measured at fair
value
defined benefit pension plans measured at fair value.
Going concern
The cash position of the Group as of December 31, 2021 amounts to € 32.3 million. Based on (i) this
cash position, (ii) the current development plan of the Group including the completion of its ongoing
Phase 2 NASH trial for PXL065 (DESTINY 1) but excluding the two identical Phase 2a clinical proof-of-
concept (POC) biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN), (iii) on
the cash forecast for the year 2022 approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, that does not
include any net sales from Imeglimin in Japan as a conservative approach, and (iv) a strict control of its
operating expenses, the Group expects that its resources will be sufficient to fund its operations and
capital expenditure requirements through at least 12 months from the reporting date (December 31,
2022). However, the Group is subject to certain financial covenants related to its debt with IPF Partners
(see note 14.1) which could be potentially breached in Q3 2022. The Group is actively pursuing various
financing options which would extend its cash runway and avoid any breach of financial covenants
through at least 12 months from the reporting date. These financing options include dilutive and non-
dilutive sources, as well as discussions with the Group’s lender, and the Group reasonably expects that
Page 190
at least one of the pursued options would be completed before Q3 2022. As a consequence, the Group
2021 financials are presented on a going concern basis.
Use of judgments and estimates
In order to prepare financial statements in accordance with IFRS, estimates, judgments and
assumptions were made by the Group’s management, which could affect the reported amounts of
assets, liabilities, contingent liabilities, income and expenses.
These estimates are based on the assumption of going concern and are prepared in accordance with
information available at the date the financial statements were prepared. They are reviewed on an
ongoing basis using past experience and various other factors considered to be reasonable as the basis
to measure the carrying amount of assets and liabilities. Estimates may be revised due to changes in
the underlying circumstances or subsequent to new information. Actual results may differ significantly
from these estimates in line with assumptions or different conditions.
The main estimates or significant judgments made by the Group’s management impact the following
items:
-
recognition of revenues (note 18), notably for the estimate of the transaction price and of the
choice of the method of allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations;
allocation of share subscription warrants, stock options, performance shares or warrants to
employees, executives and external providers (note 13) notably on the evaluation methods of
the instruments;
-
-
-
IPF debt and derivative liability (note 14.1), notably on the evaluation of the derivative liability.
assessment of risk of impairment of the DeuteRx intangible asset (note 6);
Note 3: Summary of significant accounting policies
3.1 Consolidation scope and methods
The Group applies IFRS 10 – Consolidated Financial Statements, IFRS 11 – Joint Arrangements, IFRS 12
– Disclosure of Interests in Other Entities.
IFRS 10 presents a single consolidation model identifying control as the criteria for consolidating an
entity. An investor controls an investee if it has the power over the entity, is exposed or has rights to
variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to use its power over the entity
to affect the amount of the investor’s returns.
Subsidiaries are entities over which the Group exercises control. They are fully consolidated from the
date the Group obtains control and are deconsolidated from the date the Group ceases to exercise
control. Inter-company balances and transactions are eliminated.
Page 191
The following entities are included in the Group’s consolidation scope:
COMPANY
NAME
CONSOLIDATION
METHOD
% CONTROL
% INTEREST
COUNTRY
AS OF DECEMBER, 31
AS OF DECEMBER,
AS OF DECEMBER,
31
31
2021
2020
2021
2020
2021
2020
POXEL S.A.
France
Japan
USA
-
-
-
-
-
-
POXEL JAPAN KK
POXEL INC
FC
FC
FC
FC
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
FC: full consolidation.
3.2 Translation of Group entities’ consolidated financial statements
Pursuant to IAS 21 – The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates, items included in the
consolidated financial statements of each of the Group entities are measured using the currency of the
primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the “functional currency”).
The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in euros which is the Group’s presentation and
functional currency.
The financial statements of foreign entities, whose functional currency is not the euro, are translated
into euros as follows:
-
-
assets and liabilities are translated at the closing exchange rate at the reporting date; and
income and expense items are translated at the exchange rate on the transaction date or at
the average exchange rate for the period, if this rate approximates the exchange rate on the
transaction date.
Exchange differences resulting from the application of this method are recognized in consolidated
equity in “Other comprehensive income”.
3.3 Foreign currency
Transactions in foreign currency are translated into the Group’s functional currency by applying the
foreign exchange rate in effect at the transaction date. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in
a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency at the year-end closing exchange rate.
Any resulting foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary assets correspond to the difference
between the amortized cost in the functional currency at the opening of the period, adjusted for the
impact of the effective interest rate and payments for the period, and the amortized cost in the foreign
currency translated at the year-end closing exchange rate.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency that are measured at fair value
are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rate at the date on which fair value was
determined. Any resulting translation differences are recorded in income.
Receivables and payables denominated in a foreign currency are recorded at the exchange rate in
effect at the initial transaction. At year-end, the accounts corresponding to assets and liabilities are
valued at the closing exchange rate.
Page 192
3.4 Intangible assets
Separately acquired research and development
Separately acquired research and development are capitalized within "Other intangible assets"
provided that they meet the definition of an intangible asset: a resource that is (i) controlled by the
Group, (ii) expected to provide future economic benefits for the Group, and (iii) identifiable (i.e. it is
either separable or arises from contractual or legal rights).
In accordance with paragraph 25 of IAS 38 Intangible Assets, the first recognition criterion, relating to
the likelihood of future economic benefits generated by the intangible asset, is presumed to be
achieved for research and development activities when they are acquired separately.
In this context, amounts paid to third parties in the form of initial payments or milestone payments
relating to pharmaceutical specialties that have not yet obtained generating economic benefit are
recognized as intangible assets. These rights are amortized on a straight-line basis, after obtaining the
marketing authorization, over their useful life. Unamortized rights (before marketing authorization)
are subject to impairment tests in accordance with the method defined in note 3.6.
Internally generated research and development
Pursuant to IAS 38 – Intangible Assets, research costs are recorded in the consolidated financial
statements as expenses in the period during which they are incurred.
Development costs are only recognized as intangible assets if the following criteria are met:
-
-
-
-
-
-
It is technically feasible to complete the development of the project;
The Group’s intention to complete the project and to utilize it;
Capacity to utilize the intangible asset;
Proof of the probability of future economic benefits associated with the asset;
Availability of the technical, financial, and other resources for completing the project;
Reliable evaluation of the development expenses.
The initial measurement of the asset is the sum of expenses incurred starting on the date on which the
development project meets the above criteria. Expenditures cease to be capitalized when the
intangible asset is ready for use. Development costs capitalized are amortized over their useful lives.
Because of the risks and uncertainties related to regulatory approvals and to the research and
development process, the Group believes that the six criteria stipulated by IAS 38 have not been
fulfilled to date and the application of this principle has resulted in all development costs being
expensed as incurred in all periods presented.
Other intangible assets
Other intangible assets are primarily composed of acquired software. Costs related to the acquisition
of software licenses are recognized as assets based on the costs incurred to acquire and set up the
related software. Software is amortized using the straight-line method over a period of one to three
years depending on the anticipated useful life.
3.5 Tangible assets
Pursuant to IAS 16 – Property, Plant and Equipment, property, plant and equipment are recognized at
their acquisition cost (purchase price and directly attributable costs) or at their production cost by the
Group, as applicable.
Page 193
Property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life of the asset.
The depreciation periods and methods used are primarily the followings:
Items
Depreciation period
Facilities and fixtures
5 to 10 years (SL)
IT equipment
1 to 3 years (SL)
5 years (SL)
Furniture
SL: straight line
The useful lives of property, plant and equipment as well as any residual values are reviewed at each
year-end and, in the event of a significant change, resulting in a prospective revision of the
depreciation schedule.
The amortization expense of property, plant and equipment is recognized in the income statement in
the category of administrative costs given the nature of the assets held.
Leases and right-of-use assets
From January 1, 2019, with the adoption of IFRS 16 Leases, the Group adopted the following
accounting policies for leases and right-of-use assets:
As lessee, the Group assesses whether a contract contains a lease at inception of a contract and upon
the modification of a contract. The Group elected to allocate the consideration in the contract to the
lease and non-lease components on the basis of the relative standalone price. The Group recognizes a
right-of-use asset and a corresponding lease liability for all arrangements in which it is a lessee, except
for leases with a term of 12 months or less (short-term leases) and low-value leases. For these short-
term and low-value leases, the Group recognizes the lease payments as an operating expense on a
straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The lease liability is initially measured at the present
value of the future lease payments as from the commencement date of the lease to the end of the
lease term. The lease term includes the period of any lease extension that in management’s
assessment is reasonably certain to be exercised by the Group. The lease payments are discounted
using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if not readily determinable, the Group incremental
borrowing rate for the asset subject to the lease in the respective markets.
The Group remeasures the lease liability (and makes a corresponding adjustment to the related right-
of-use asset) whenever there is a change to the lease terms or expected payments under the lease, or
a modification that is not accounted for as a separate lease. The portion of the lease payments
attributable to the repayment of lease liabilities is recognized in cash flows used in financing activities,
and the portion attributable to the payment of interest is included in cash flows from operating
activities.
Right-of-use assets are initially recognized on the balance sheet at cost, which comprises the amount
of the initial measurement of the corresponding lease liability, adjusted for any lease payments made
at or prior to the commencement date of the lease, any lease incentives received and any initial direct
costs incurred by the Group, and expected costs for obligations to dismantle and remove right-of-use
assets when they are no longer used.
Right-of-use assets are depreciated on a straight-line basis from the commencement date of the lease
over the shorter of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the end of the lease term.
Page 194
Right-of-use assets are assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the balance sheet
carrying amount may not be recoverable using cash flow projections for the useful life.
3.6 Impairment of assets
Pursuant to IAS 36 – Impairment of assets, assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized and
are subject to an annual impairment test. Depreciated assets are tested for impairment whenever
there is an internal or external indication that an asset may have lost value.
The impairment test consists in comparing the net book value of the tested asset with its recoverable
value. The test is performed at the level of the Cash Generating Unit ("CGU"), which is the smallest
group of assets that includes the asset and whose continued use generates cash inflows that are largely
independent of those generated by the cash generating unit of other assets or groups of assets.
An impairment loss is recorded in the amount of the excess of the carrying amount over the
recoverable amount of the asset. The recoverable amount of an asset is its fair value less costs to sell
or its value in use, whichever is greater.
Impairment tests are performed at the end of the year for unamortized assets (whether or not there
is an indication of impairment), based on estimated cash flows determined by management. The
estimates used in calculating the recoverable value are highly sensitive and depend on assumptions
specific to the nature of the Group’s activities with regard to:
-
Forecast development cost, sales and cost of sales versus the Term of Patent Protection,
-
Discount rate: discount rates are determined on the basis of a base rate calculated for the
group, adjusted if necessary, by a specific risk premium.
-
-
-
-
-
Long-term sales forecasts
Actions of competitors
Outcome of R&D activities (compound efficacy, results of clinical trials, etc…)
Probability of obtaining regulatory approval
Amount and timing of projected costs to develop IP R&D into commercially viable products
Fair value less costs of disposal is the amount that can be obtained from the sale of an asset in an arm's
length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties, less the costs of exit.
Value in use is the present value of expected future cash flows expected from the continued use of an
asset and its disposal at the end of its useful life. Value in use is determined from estimated cash flows
of plans or budgets, based on the expected asset and sales development plan and discounted using
long-term after-tax market rates that reflect market estimates of the time value of money and the
specific risks of assets.
As of December 31, 2021:
-
-
The Group has no intangible assets with an indefinite life.
As explained in Note 3.4, the Group has an amortizable intangible asset related to the acquired
R&D, which amortization will start as from the obtention of the marketing authorization. This
asset has been subject to an impairment test (note 6);
-
Non-current assets do not present any indication of impairment.
Page 195
3.7 Financial assets
From January 1, 2018 and pursuant to IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments, the Group’s financial assets are
classified in two categories according to their nature and the intention of management:
-
-
Financial assets at fair value through profit and loss;
Financial assets at amortized cost.
All purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized at the settlement date.
Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss
This category includes marketable securities, cash and cash equivalents. They represent financial
assets held for trading purposes, i.e., assets acquired by the Group to be sold in the short-term. They
are measured at fair value and changes in fair value are recognized in the consolidated statement of
income (loss) as financial income or expense, as applicable.
Financial assets at amortized cost
This category includes other financial assets (non-current), trade receivables (current) and other
receivables and related accounts (current). Other financial assets (non-current) include advances and
deposits granted to third parties as well as term deposits, which are not considered as cash
equivalents.
Financial assets at amortized cost primarily consist of deposits and guarantees, restricted cash, trade
receivables, other receivables, conditional advances and loans. They are non-derivative financial assets
with fixed or determinable payments that are not listed on an active market. They are initially
recognized at fair value plus transaction costs that are directly attributable to the acquisition or issue
of the financial asset, except trade receivables that are initially recognized at the transaction price as
defined in IFRS 15.
After initial recognition, these financial assets are measured at amortized cost using the effective
interest rate method when both of the following conditions are met:
(a) The financial asset is held within a business model whose objective is to hold financial assets
in order to collect contractual cash flows; and
(b) The contractual terms of the financial asset give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are
solely payments of principal and interest on the principal amount outstanding.
Gains and losses are recorded in the consolidated statement of income (loss) when they are
derecognized, subject to modification of contractual cash flows and/or impaired.
IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments requires an entity to recognize a loss allowance for expected credit
losses on a financial asset at amortized cost at each Statement of Financial Position date. The amount
of the loss allowance for expected credit losses equals to: (i) the 12- month expected credit losses or
(ii) the full lifetime expected credit losses. The latter applies if credit risk has increased significantly
since initial recognition of the financial instrument. An impairment is recognized, where applicable, on
a case–by–case basis to take into account collection difficulties which are likely to occur based on
information available at the time of preparation of the consolidated financial statements.
Disputed receivables are written-off when the entity has no reasonable expectations of recovering the
financial asset in its entirety or a portion thereof, and existing credit loss allowance are released.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and short-term deposits recorded in the balance sheet comprise cash balances and short-term
deposits very liquid having initial maturity term less or equal to three months and which are not subject
to a material risk of changes of the fair value.
Page 196
Cash equivalents consist of marketable securities. Cash equivalents are held for trading purposes, are
readily convertible into a known amount of cash and are subject to a negligible risk of change in value.
They are measured at fair value and changes in value are recorded in financial income.
For the purpose of the cash flow statement, in accordance with IAS 7, net cash includes cash and cash
equivalents, net of bank overdrafts.
Fair value of financial instruments
Securities classified as cash equivalents at the end of the financial year are recognized at fair value in
the statement of income (loss), with fair value corresponding to market value.
Borrowings and financial liabilities are recognized at amortized cost, calculated using the effective
interest rate or the fair value option in the statement of loss.
The fair value of trade receivables and trade payables is equivalent to their carrying amount, given the
short settlement times. The same applies to other current receivables and payables.
The Group uses the following three-level hierarchy for financial instruments according to the
consequences that their characteristics have on their valuation method and uses this classification to
present certain disclosures requested in IFRS 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures:
-
-
Level 1: financial instruments that reflect quoted prices in active markets;
Level 2: financial instruments measured using observable market inputs other than Level 1
inputs;
-
Level 3: inputs not based on observable market data. Unobservable inputs are defined as an
input whose value results from assumptions or correlations that are not based on transaction
prices on the observable market, on the same instrument at the measurement date, or on
observable market data available at the same date.
Instruments recognized at fair value in the statement of loss held by the Group include:
-
Cash and cash equivalents, using level 1 measurements for cash at hand and money market
funds and level 2 for Fixed term deposits.
-
The fair value of IPF derivative liability, which fall under the level 3.
3.8 Share Capital
The classification in equity depends on the specific analysis of the characteristics of each instrument
issued. Based on this analysis, when the entity that issued the financial instrument does not have a
contractual obligation to deliver cash or another financial asset to the bearer, the financial instrument
is an equity instrument. Thus, if the holder of an equity instrument is entitled to a proportionate share
of the dividends, the issuer has no contractual obligation to make this distribution, as this is the sole
decision of shareholders at the annual general meeting.
Company’s treasury shares held are deducted from equity.
Transaction costs directly attributable to the issuance of shares or equity warrants are recognized as a
deduction from shareholders’ equity when the likelihood of the capital increase is considered
reasonably probable. Until that point, transaction costs are expensed. In the event that the transaction
ultimately does not take place, these costs would then be fully expensed in the following year.
3.9 Share-based payment
Since its inception, the Group has established several plans for compensation paid in equity
instruments in the form of performance shares (“Attributions gratuites d’actions de Performance”, or
“AGAP”), share options (“SO”), share subscription warrants (“Bons de souscription d’actions”, or
“BSA”) and Founder’s share warrants (Bons de souscription de parts de créateur d’entreprise, or
Page 197
“BSPCE”) granted to its employees, executives, members of the board of directors and other
individuals including scientific consultants.
Pursuant to IFRS 2 – Share based payment, these awards are measured at their fair value on the date
of grant and the cost of equity-settled transactions is recognized as an expense over the period in
which the rights to benefit from the equity instruments are acquired, in exchange for an increase in
equity.
The Group has applied IFRS 2 to all equity instruments granted, since the inception of the Group, to
employees, members of the Board of Directors or individuals providing services such as consultants.
The fair value is calculated with the most relevant formula regarding the conditions and the settlement
of each plan (see Note 13).
3.10 Financial liabilities
Pursuant to IFRS 9 – Financial Instruments, financial liabilities are measured at amortized cost or at fair
value through profit or loss. Financial liabilities that are due within one year are presented in “Financial
liabilities—current portion” in the consolidated statement of financial position.
Financial liabilities are classified as financial liabilities at amortized cost or financial liabilities
recognized at fair value through profit or loss.
Financial liabilities at amortized cost
Borrowings and other financial liabilities, such as conditional advances, are recognized at amortized
cost calculated using the effective interest rate. Financial liabilities that are due in less than one year
are presented in “Financial liabilities—current portion” in the statement of financial position.
Financial liabilities at fair value through profit or loss
Where applicable, a financial liability may be recognized at fair value in the income statement. This
category includes derivative financial instruments.
Conditional advances and subsidies
Conditional advances
Funds received from Bpifrance Financement, the French public investment bank (formerly Oséo) in the
form of conditional advances are recognized as financial liabilities, as the Group has a contractual
obligation to reimburse in cash Bpifrance Financement for such conditional advances, based on a
repayment schedule. Each award of an advance is made to help fund a specific development milestone.
The details concerning the conditional advances are provided in Note 14.2. Receipts or
reimbursements of conditional advances are reflected as financing transactions in the statement of
cash flows.
The Group receives interest-free, conditional advances to finance research and development projects.
The difference between the present value of the advance at market rate (i.e., capital repaid at maturity
without interest, discounted to the market rate) and the amount received as cash from the French
public investment bank constitutes a subsidy within the meaning of IAS 20 Accounting for Government
Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, or IAS 20. This benefit is determined by applying a
discount rate equal to the market interest rate.
The implicit interest rate resulting from taking into account the whole repayments plus the additional
payments due in case of commercial success as described in Note 14.2 is used to determine the amount
recognized annually as a finance expense, based on observable rates of comparable companies.
In the event of a change in payment schedule of the stipulated repayments of the conditional
advances, the Group recalculates the net book value of the debt resulting from the discounting of the
anticipated new future cash flows at the initial effective interest rate. The adjustment that results
Page 198
therefrom is recognized in the statement of loss for the period during which the modification is
recognized.
Subsidies are presented separately in the consolidated statement of income (loss) and the Group opted
for a classification as a deduction of the “Research and development expenses” since they correspond
to innovation aid and funding for research and development activities in accordance with IAS 20.
In the consolidated statement of financial position, these advances are recorded in “Financial
liabilities” as current or non-current portion depending on their maturity. In the event the Group fails
to achieve a particular milestone that would trigger reimbursement of the conditional advance, the
remaining liability is recognized as a subsidy in the consolidated statement of income (loss).
Subsidies
Subsidies received are grants that are not repayable by the Group and are recognized in the
Consolidated Financial Statements where there exists reasonable assurance that the Group will comply
with the conditions attached to the subsidies and the subsidies will be received.
Subsidies that are upfront payments are presented as deferred revenue and recognized through
income up to expenses incurred as part of the research and development program to which the subsidy
relates.
Research Tax Credit
The Group benefits from the provisions of Articles 244c and 49f of the French General Tax Code relating
to the French research tax credit (“Crédit d’Impôt Recherche” or “CIR”). The CIR is granted to
companies by French tax authorities in order to encourage them to conduct technical and scientific
research. Companies that prove that they have expenditures which meet the required criteria
(research expenditures located in France or, since January 1, 2005, within the European Union or in
another State that is a party to the Agreement on the European Economic Area and has concluded a
tax treaty with France that contains an administrative assistance clause) receive a tax credit that can
be used for the payment of the corporate income tax due for the fiscal year in which the expenditures
were made and the next three fiscal years, or as applicable, can be reimbursed in cash. The
expenditures taken into account for the calculation of the CIR involve only research and development
expenses.
The Group has been granted CIR since its inception and receives reimbursements in cash the year after
the date of its record as a tax credit in the Group’s financial statement, pursuant to the application of
Community tax rules for small and medium firms in compliance with the regulatory texts.
The CIR is presented under “other operating income” in the consolidated statement of income (loss)
as it meets the definition of government grant as defined in IAS 20 – Accounting for Government Grants
and Disclosure of Government Assistance.
3.11 Employee benefits
The Group’s employees in France benefit from retirement benefits provided under French law, which
consist in the following:
-
-
Compensation paid by the Group to employees upon their retirement (a defined benefit plan);
Payment of retirement pensions by the social security agencies, which are funded by the
contributions made by the companies and employees (a defined contribution plan).
In accordance with IAS 19 – Employee Benefits, the liability with respect to defined benefit plans is
estimated by using the projected credit unit method. According to this method, the cost of the
retirement benefit is recognized in the consolidated statement of income (loss) so that it is distributed
uniformly over the term of the services of the employees. The retirement benefit commitments are
valued at the current value of the estimated future payments, discounted using the market rate for
Page 199
high quality corporate bonds with a term that corresponds to that estimated for the payment of the
benefits. The difference between the amount of the provision at the beginning of a period and at the
close of that period is recognized through profit or loss for the portion representing the costs of
services rendered and the net interest costs, and through other comprehensive income / (loss) for the
portion representing the actuarial gains and losses.
The Group’s payments for the defined contribution plan are recognized as expenses on the
consolidated statement of income (loss) of the period in which they become payable.
In 2021, the Group applied the change in accounting treatment of the pension liability according to
IFRIC decision, presented in Note 2 Change in accounting policies.
3.12 Provisions
Provisions correspond to commitments resulting from litigation and various risks to which the Group
may face in the context of its operations. In accordance with IAS 37 – Provisions, Contingent Liabilities
and Contingent Assets, a provision is recorded when the Group has an obligation to a third party
resulting from a past event that will probably result in an outflow of resources to the third party, with
no equivalent consideration expected, and for which future cash outflows may be estimated reliably.
The amount recorded as a provision is an estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation,
discounted where necessary at year-end.
3.13 Income tax
Tax assets and liabilities payable for the financial year and previous years are recorded at the amount
that is expected to be recovered from or paid to the tax authorities in accordance with IAS 12 – Income
Tax. The tax rate and regulations used to determine this amount are those which have been enacted
or substantively enacted at year-end.
Deferred taxes are recorded using the balance sheet liability method, for temporary differences at
year-end between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities and their tax basis, and losses carried
forward. The main temporary differences are related to tax loss carryforwards.
A deferred tax asset is recognized for deductible temporary differences, unused tax losses and unused
tax credits, to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which the
deductible temporary differences can be utilized beyond the amount of existing deferred tax liability
in the same tax jurisdiction and the same taxable entity. The measurement of the amount of deferred
tax assets may require management to make estimates regarding the period during which the tax loss
carryforwards are to be used and on the level of future taxable income.
3.14 Revenue
Group’s revenue comes from out-licensing of intellectual property and research and development
services. The turnover is presented net of VAT and discounts.
-
Sale of licenses
The licenses granted by the Group correspond to rights of use. As a result, income under these licenses
is recognized immediately from the date from which the customer can begin to use the license. The
consideration received may be fixed or variable. Variable consideration is only recognized when it is
highly probable that a significant reversal will not occur.
When royalty payments are made in the form of royalties, based on future sales by the customer, the
Group applies the exception provided by IFRS 15 to the general rule of valuation of variable payments.
The royalties are thus recorded in sales when the customer's sales take place.
-
Services
The Group provides research and development services to clients. These services are carried out in the
context of obtaining a future Marketing Authorization. The turnover for these services is recognized at
Page 200
the stage of advancement, the customer benefiting from the service as the group carries out the work.
Advancement is measured by costs.
-
Collaboration agreements
The Group may enter into collaborative agreements that include both the sale of a license and research
and development services. For these contracts, the Group estimates the amount to which it is entitled
in exchange for each item promised to customers. The amount that is highly probable (non-refundable
advances, guaranteed payments and estimated research and development costs incurred) is allocated
to the various elements of the contract in proportion to their specific selling prices.
Contracts may include milestone payments, the perception of which depends on the achievement of
certain development, regulatory or commercial objectives. Milestone income is recognized at the point
in time when it is highly probable that the respective milestone event criteria is met, and the risk of
reversal of revenue recognition is remote.
3.15 Cost of sales
Cost of sales includes the cost of royalties paid to third parties on net sales.
3.16 Financial income (loss)
Net financial income / (loss) includes:
-
-
-
-
changes in the fair value of liabilities recognized at fair value through profit or loss;
expenses related to interest incurred on financial liabilities;
income related to interest received;
exchange gains or losses on foreign currency held at year-end are also recorded in net financial
income / (loss).
3.17 Earnings per share
In accordance with IAS 33 – Earnings per Share, basic income (loss) per share is calculated by dividing
the income (loss) attributable to equity holders of the Group by the weighted average number of
outstanding shares for the period.
Diluted income (loss) per share is measured by dividing the income (loss) attributable to holders of
equity and dilutive instruments by the weighted average number of outstanding shares and dilutive
instruments for the period.
If in the calculation of diluted income (loss) per share, instruments giving deferred rights to capital such
as warrants generate an antidilutive effect in the event of an income loss. In such case, these
instruments are not taken into account.
Page 201
Note 4: Significant events
4.1 Year ended December 31, 2021
Increase in capital
Performance shares and warrants
On January 27, 2021, the Group noted the definitive allocation of 115,731 performance shares,
representing a capital increase of €2,315 taken from the reserves.
On June 20, 2021, the Group noted the definitive allocation of 1,604 performance shares, representing
a capital increase of €32, taken from the reserves.
On June 22, 2021, 2,875 warrants corresponding to 57,500 ordinary shares were exercised at a strike
price of €4, representing a capital increase of €1,150 with a share premium of €228,850.
On September 25, 2021, the Group noted the definitive allocation of 33,334 performance shares,
representing a capital increase of €667, taken from the reserves
Accordingly, the share capital is €574,073.84 at December 31, 2021, divided in 28,703,692 shares of
€0.02 of nominal value.
Marketing approval of TWYMEEG® (Imeglimin) for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Japan and
milestone payment
On June 23, 2021, the Group and Sumitomo Pharma announced that a new drug application for
TWYMEEG® Tablets 500mg (International Nonproprietary Name (INN): Imeglimin hydrochloride), for
the treatment of type 2 diabetes, was approved in Japan. Japan is the first country in the world to
approve Imeglimin.
The approval in Japan triggered a JPY 1.75 billion (approximately €13.2 million) milestone payment to
Poxel from Sumitomo Pharma that was recognized as revenue in June 2021 and paid in July 2021.
IPF Financing
In November 2019, the Group entered into a Subscription Agreement with IPF Partners to secure
additional funding in the form of three separate bond tranches up to a total borrowing amount of €30
million and related warrants to purchase up to €4.5 million of its ordinary shares. In November 2019
and March 2020, the Group borrowed €6.5 million under the first tranche and €10.0 million under the
second tranche respectively.
In June 2021, following the Marketing approval of Imeglimin in Japan, the Group borrowed €13.5
million under the third and final tranche of IPF Venture Loan and issued warrants to purchase 156,250
ordinary shares with an exercise price of €6.72 (see note 14.1).
Update on Roivant partnership with Imeglimin
As part of the decision by Roivant not to advance Imeglimin into a Phase 3 program for strategic
reasons, its partnership agreement with Roivant has been terminated, effective January 31, 2021.
Roivant has returned all rights to Imeglimin to Poxel, as well as all data, materials, and information,
including FDA regulatory filings related to the program. Roivant is not entitled to any payment from
Poxel as part of the return of the program.
Arbitration with Merck Serono
As part of the application of the agreement with Merck Serono to the partnership agreement signed
with Roivant in February 2018, the Company and Merck Serono had a different interpretation of
Poxel’s revenue base to be subject to royalties. In April 2019, the Company was notified that Merck
Santé had initiated an arbitral proceeding in order to resolve this difference in interpretation.
Page 202
On 18 February 2021, an Arbitral Tribunal rendered a “Final Award” concluding the ICC arbitration
between the Company and Merck Santé. The tribunal’s decision is final and the litigation has been
closed following a payment to Merck Serono for a total amount of €2.4 million (excl. VAT).
Covid-19 outbreak
As of the date of this report, and based on publicly available information, the Group has not identified
the occurrence of any material negative effects on its business due to the COVID-19 pandemic that
remains unresolved, other than the impact on the commercialization of TWYMEEG® in Japan by the
Group's partner Sumitomo Pharma. Similarly, the Group has not identified the occurrence of any
material negative effect on its business due to the recent geopolitical events in Ukraine and Russia.
However, the Group anticipates that the COVID-19 pandemic could have further material negative
impact on its business operations. The worldwide impact of COVID-19 may notably affect the Group’s
internal organization and efficiency, particularly in countries where it operates and where confinement
measures are implemented by the authorities. In addition, COVID-19 as well as recent geopolitical
events in Ukraine and Russia may impact market conditions and the Group’s ability to seek additional
funding or enter into partnerships. Particularly, delays in the supply of drug substance or drug
products, in the initiation or the timing of results of preclinical and/or clinical trials, as well as delays
linked to the responsiveness of regulatory authorities could occur, which could potentially have an
impact on the Group’s development programs and partnered programs. The Group will continue to
proactively monitor the situation.
Exercise of the extension option for the non-dilutive French government Guaranteed loan (PGE)
In October 2020, The Group received the approvals from BNP Paribas, Bpifrance and CIC Lyonnaise de
Banque for a € 6 million non-dilutive financing in the form of a French Government Guarantee loan.
Each loan had an initial term of one-year, with a five-year extension option.
In July 2021, addendums to the original contracts were executed to exercise this extension option, and
formalize a 2-year deferred amortization period followed by a 4-year repayment period.
4.2 Post closing events
None
Note 5: Segment information
The Group operates in one segment: the development of innovative treatments for chronic serious
diseases with metabolic pathophysiology, including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and rare
disorders (ALD/AMN).
Poxel SA has a subsidiary in Japan since 2018 and a subsidiary in the USA since 2019, which have no
significant activity at closing, except for personnel expenses. Thus, most of the assets and operating
income presented are located in France. The Group's performance is currently assessed at the
consolidated level.
In 2020 and 2021, 99.8% of the Group’s revenues come from Sumitomo Pharma.
Page 203
Note 6: Intangible assets
GROSS VALUE
(Amounts in K€)
In process
other
intangible
assets
In-process
Software research and
development
Total
Statement of financial position as of December 31, 2019
13
16,572
16,572
16,572
36
16,621
Capitalization of development costs
Acquisition
Disposal
Transfer
46
46
36
-36
Statement of financial position as of December 31, 2020
95
-
16,667
Capitalization of development costs
Acquisition
Disposal
Transfer
12
-6
9
21
-6
Statement of financial position as of December 31, 2021
101
9
16,682
AMORTISATIONS
(Amounts in K€)
Statement of financial position as of December 31, 2019
7
7
Increase
17
17
Reduction
Statement of financial position as of December 31, 2020
24
33
-6
24
33
-6
Increase
Reduction
Statement of financial position as of December 31, 2021
51
51
NET BOOK VALUES
As of December 31, 2020
As of December 31, 2021
71
50
16,572
16,572
-
16,642
16,631
9
In 2018, as part of the contract signed with DeuteRx, the Group acquired a development and
commercial license to an innovative drug candidate in clinical development for the treatment of NASH
(DRX-065), as well as other programs for the treatment of metabolic diseases for a non-refundable
upfront payment of € 15,780 thousand, of which € 8,914 thousand were paid in shares and $ 8 million
(€ 6,866 thousand) were paid in cash and additional variable considerations (note 25.2). This
acquisition is recognized as an intangible asset for an amount of € 16,572 thousand, which includes €
791 thousand of acquisition costs.
The impairment tests (described in Note 3.6) did not lead to the recognition of any impairment in the
financial years presented. As part of the sensitivity tests (increase/decrease of the Probabilities of
Success rate +/- 2%, changes in sales +/- 5%, increase/decrease of the discount rate +/-1%), the Group
has not identified any change in key assumptions that could lead to an impairment, as the net present
value of the cash flows related to the DeuteRx intangible asset is higher than the carrying amount of
the assets related to the project. The main assumptions retained are:
-
A discount rate amounting to 11%;
Page 204
-
A cash-flow projection of 11 years (no terminal value was considered in the impairment test)
which relies on:
Long-term forecasts
Probabilities of success from Phase 2, which readouts are expected in Q3 2022, to
Marketing approval.
The amortization of intangible assets related to the license will commence upon generating economic
benefits.
Due to the risks and uncertainties related to the research and development process, the six capital
criteria are not considered fulfilled for any of the current development projects. As a result, all
internally generated R&D costs incurred by the Group are expensed.
Page 205
Note 7: Property, Plant and Equipment
Office
equipment
and
Computer
hardware
GROSS VALUE
(Amounts in K€)
Including
right of
use
Installation
and
fixtures
Furniture
and vehicles
Property
Total
Statement of financial position as of
December 31, 2019
2,363
254
156
142
2,914
2,374
201
Acquisition
Scrapping
174
155
17
89
435
Transfer
Statement of financial position as of
December 31, 2020
2,537
409
173
23
-71
231
231
3,349
28
-84
2,575
Acquisition
Scrapping
Statement of financial position as of
December 31, 2021
5
-13
-13
2,524
414
125
3,294
2,562
DEPRECIATION
(Amounts in K€)
Statement of financial position as of
December 31, 2019
335
77
109
71
591
343
Increase
423
37
28
45
534
430
Reduction
Statement of financial position as of
December 31, 2020
Increase
758
411
114
47
137
26
116
41
1,125
525
772
418
Reduction
-71
-71
Statement of financial position as of
December 31, 2021
1,169
161
92
157
1,579
1,190
NET BOOK VALUES
As of December 31, 2020
As of December 31, 2021
1,779
1,355
295
254
36
33
115
74
2,224
1,716
1,803
1,371
There has been no recognition of impairment loss in application of IAS 36 over the presented periods.
Note 8: Other non-current financial assets
OTHER NON-CURRENT FINANCIAL ASSETS
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
75
Dec 31, 2020
113
Equity part of the liquidity contract
Deposits related to simple leases
Total other non-current financial assets
131
206
133
246
Non-current financial assets are recorded for the deposits paid in relation to:
-
the treasury part of the market liquidity contract (€75 thousand in 2021 vs €113 thousand
in 2020) signed with Oddo Corporate Finance;
-
contracts for the simple rental of premises for the years ended December 31, 2021 and
2020, mainly for the premises of the Group headquarter in Lyon, France.
Page 206
Note 9: Trade and other receivables
Trade receivables (€50 thousand in 2021 compared with € 281 thousand in 2020) correspond mainly
to research expenses costs incurred, re-invoiced to Sumitomo Pharma.
Other receivables
OTHER RECEIVABLES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
2,228
Dec 31, 2020
2,411
Research tax credit
Value added tax, or VAT
Debtor suppliers
Prepaid expenses
Other tax receivables
Credit notes
288
665
760
-
368
1,629
953
72
-
33
Other
59
14
Total other receivables
3,999
5,480
Research Tax Credit (“CIR”)
The Group benefits from the provisions of articles 244 quater B and 49 septies F of the French General
Tax Code relating to Research Tax Credits. In accordance with the principles described in Note 2,
Research Tax Credits are deducted from research expenses for the year to which the eligible research
expenses relate. Research Tax Credits are presented as a subsidy in “Research and development costs.”
In the absence of a taxable result at least equal to the amount of the claim on the State relating to the
Research Tax Credit ("CIR"), its balance is repayable the year following that of its recognition, when
the Group has the status SMEs in the European sense, which is the case for Poxel.
VAT
VAT receivables mainly relate to deductible VAT as well as VAT refund claims.
Debtor suppliers
Debtor suppliers correspond in 2021 to advances paid to subcontractors as part of ongoing clinical
studies. In 2021, they mainly consisted of advances paid to subcontractors as part of the DESTINY-1
study (for the treatment of NASH) for the amount of €0.6 million.
Prepaid expenses
Prepaid expenses correspond mainly to administrative costs (rents, insurance) covering the next
annual period.
Note 10: Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are presented below:
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
28,754
Dec 31, 2020
15,587
Bank accounts (cash at hand)
Term deposits
3,534
24,616
32,288
40,203
Total cash and cash equivalents
Page 207
Financial net debt amounted to €2,571 thousand at December 31, 2021 as compared to cash and cash
equivalents net of financial liabilities €17,053 thousand at December 31, 2020 (see note 14).
Note 11: Financial assets and liabilities and effects on income
The Group’s assets and liabilities are valued as follows for each year:
Dec 31, 2020
Amounts in K€
Value of the
statement of Fair value
financial
situation
Fair value
through
profit and
loss
Assets at
amortized amortized
cost (1) cost (2)
Debts at
(3)
Non-current financial assets
Clients and related accounts
Other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Total financial assets
246
281
5,480
40,203
46,211
246
281
5,480
40,203
46,211
246
281
5,480
40,203
40,203
6,008
Current financial liabilities
Derivative liabilities
2,866
691
2,866
691
2,866
691
Non-current financial liabilities
20,986
20,986
20,986
Trade payables
8,362
8,362
8,362
Total financial liabilities
32,905
32,905
691
32,214
Dec 31, 2021
Amounts in K€
Value of
the
statement
of financial
situation
Fair value
through
profit and
loss
Assets at
amortized amortized
cost (1) cost (2)
Debts at
Fair value
(3)
Non-current financial assets
Clients and related accounts
Other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents
Total financial assets
206
50
3,999
32,287
36,543
206
50
3,999
32,287
36,543
206
50
3,999
32,287
32,287
4,255
-
Current financial liabilities
Derivative liabilities
5,046
153
5,046
153
5,046
-
153
Non-current financial liabilities
Trade payables
30,094
8,417
43,710
30,094
8,417
43,710
30,094
8,417
43,557
153
-
Total financial liabilities
(1)
(2)
(3)
The fair value of “loans and receivables” corresponds to the value reported in the statement of financial position (value
at the transaction date and then tested for impairment on each reporting date)
The carrying amount of financial liabilities measured at amortized cost was deemed to be a reasonable estimation of
fair value
The fair value of financial assets held for trading (such as cash at hand and money market funds in cash and cash
equivalents) is determined based on Level 1 fair value measurements and corresponds to the market value of the assets.
The fair value of derivative liabilities is based on level 2 fair value measurements, according to mathematic model and
market assumptions (risk-free rate, share price, volatility, etc.).
Page 208
Note 12: Capital
12.1 Share capital issued
Share capital is set at €574,073.84. As of December 31, 2021, it is divided into 28,703,692 ordinary
shares that are fully subscribed and paid up with a par value of €0.02.
The 28,703,692 shares do not include outstanding share warrants (Bons de souscription d’actions or
BSAs), founder’s share warrants (Bons de souscription de parts de créateur d’entreprise or BSPCEs),
and stock options (SO), which have not been exercised. Performance shares (Attribution Gratuite
d’Actions de Performance, or AGAP) are not included before their definitive acquisition.
COMPOSITION OF SHARE CAPITAL
Dec 31, 2021
574,073.84
Dec 31, 2020
569,910.46
Capital (in euros)
Number of shares
28,703,692
28,703,692
0
28,495,523
28,495,523
0
of which ordinary shares
of which preference shares
Nominal value (in euros)
0.02 €
0.02 €
12.2 Change in share capital
In 2020 and 2021, various equity transactions occurred that modified the Group’s share capital which
are further described in Note 4.1.
Capital management
The Group manages its capital to safeguard that it will be able to continue as a going concern. At the
same time, the Group wants to ensure the return to its shareholders through the results from its
research and development activities.
Poxel capital structure consists of cash at bank and in hand and cash equivalents, financial debt, and
equity attributed to the holders of the Company’s equity instruments, such as capital, reserves and
results carried forward, as mentioned in the consolidated statement of changes in equity.
The Group manages its capital structure and makes the necessary adjustments in the light of changes
of economic circumstances, the risk characteristics of underlying assets and the projected cash needs
of the current research and development activities.
The adequacy of the capital structure will depend on many factors, including scientific progress in the
research and development programs, the magnitude of those programs, the commitments to existing
and new clinical CROs, the ability to establish new alliance or collaboration agreements, the capital
expenditures, market developments and any future acquisition.
Neither Poxel nor any of its subsidiaries are subject to any externally imposed capital requirements,
other than the covenant related to the six-month cash covenant that applies to the IPF partners
agreement (described in note 14.1) and those imposed by generally applicable company law
requirements.
Page 209
Changes in share capital
Number of
shares
Premium related
to share capital
Amounts In K€ (except number of shares)
Share capital
Total as of January 1, 2020
Performance shares
Exercise of BSPCE employees
Capital increase (May 2020)
Subscription of equity warrants
Total as of December 31, 2020
26,054,763
521
1
1
47
-
129,024
-1
163
16,597
66
26,611
55,666
2,358,483
-
28,495,523
570
145,849
Total as of December 31, 2020
Performance shares
28,495,523
570
145,849
-3
150,669
3
Exercise of BSA
57,500
1
229
Reclassification in equity
Subscription of equity warrants
Total as of December 31, 2021
-
-
-
-
(121,361)
65
28,703,692
574
24,780
Distribution of dividends
The Group did not distribute any dividend for any of the periods presented.
The results of the previous financial years are fully allocated to the reserves.
Page 210
Note 13: Share warrants
The Group has issued warrants, or BSAs, and founder’s share warrants, or BSPCEs, Stock Options or SO
and Performance shares.
Warrants (Bons de souscription d’actions, or BSAs)
The following table summarizes the data relating to warrants as well as the assumptions used for the
measurement thereof in accordance with IFRS 2:
Number
of
warrants
Number
of
warrants
Maximum
number of
shares to be
issued
Number
of lapsed
warrants
Number of
warrants
outstanding
Grant date
Type
issued
exercised
Feb 20, 2013
March 12, 2014
Jan 8, 2015
April 29, 2015
May 7, 2015
BSA 31-10-2012
BSA 31-10-2012
BSA 25-07-2014
BSA 16-06-2015
BSA 16-06-2015
2,500
2,500
42,500
42,500
240,000
0
1,000
1,875
1,500
625
42,500
42,500
240,000
30,000
0
0
0
0
12,500
42,500
42,500
240,000
0
0
0
Jan 29, 2016
Jan 29, 2016
BSA 29-01-2016
BSA 29-01-2016
42,500
42,500
0
0
0
0
42,500
42,500
42,500
42,500
March 31, 2016
Jan 27, 2017
June 30, 2017
Jan 25, 2018
Jan 24, 2019
Feb 14, 2020
BSA 29-01-2016
BSA 27-01-2017
BSA 30-06-2017
BSA 2018
BSA 2019
BSA 2020
42,500
62,500
25,000
0
12,500
0
15,000
20,000
20,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
42,500
50,000
25,000
42,500
50,000
25,000
90,000
75,000
75,000
120,000
120,000
100,282
975,282
100,000
100,000
100,282
904,907
100,000
100,000
100,282
945,282
Jan 27, 2021
BSA 2021
At December 31, 2021
67,500
2,875
Page 211
Underlying assumptions used for the measurement of the compensation expense
Fair value
IFRS 2
Risk-free valuation
Fair value
of the
warrants
of the
underlyin
g share
Expected
term
Strike
price (in €)
Type
Duration Volatility
rate
at
inception
BSA 31-10-2012
BSA 31-10-2012
BSA 25-07-2014
BSA 16-06-2015
BSA 16-06-2015
BSA 29-01-2016
BSA 29-01-2016
BSA 29-01-2016
BSA 27-01-2017
BSA 30-06-2017
BSA 2018
4.23 €
8.00 €
8.20 €
13.57 €
13.57 €
9.07 €
9.07 €
12.23 €
6.76 €
6.61 €
6.74 €
5.16 €
10.38 €
7.06
2.04 €
5.16 € 4.5 years
5 years
4.00 € 10 years
4.00 € 10 years
52%
55%
57%
57%
57%
53%
53%
53%
53%
53%
53%
53%
44%
43%
2.2%
72
228
219
288
1,551
121
121
220
166
66
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.2%
0.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.16 €
6.77 €
6.46 €
2.84 €
2.84 €
5.19 €
2.66 € 5.5 years
2.64 € 5.5 years
2.84 € 5.5 years
0.00 € 5.5 years
6 years
6 years
6 years
6 years
6 years
6 years
4.00 € 10 years
9.37 € 10 years
9.62 € 10 years
9.05 € 10 years
9.05 € 10 years
9.26 € 10 years
7.17 € 10 years
6.90 € 10 years
6.60 € 10 years
5.20 € 10 years
10.77 € 10 years
7.06€ 10 years
256
-
BSA 2019
BSA 2020
BSA 2021
0.00 €
0.00
4 years
4 years
-
-
The warrants issued before the division of the nominal by 20, effective in March 2014, are convertible
to 20 ordinary shares. Consequently, the underlying fair value, the fair value of the warrant and the
exercise price have been adjusted accordingly.
The exercise price of the rights attributed after the listing on the stock market is based on the average
share price during the 20 days before attribution.
Warrants issued between 2010 and 2019 are fully vested at December 31, 2021.
Exercise rights for warrants issued in January 2020 are vested over a one-year period.
The exercise of the warrants issued is not subject to a performance condition. It is subject to a
condition of presence.
The number of shares that the warrants give right to purchase is subject to a performance condition
for BSA 2021.
All warrants have been fully subscribed except for the BSA 2019, 2020 and 2021 which have a
subscription period of 10 years from the grant date.
These plans are qualified as “equity settled”. The Group does not commit to repurchase these
instruments from beneficiaries in the event of departure or in the case of non-occurrence of a
particular event.
Stock options
The following table summarizes the data relating to option plans issued as well as the assumptions
used for the measurement thereof in accordance with IFRS 2:
Page 212
Number of Number of Number of Number of Maximum
Stock
Options
issued
lapsed
Stock
Options
Stock
Options
exercised outstanding
Stock
Options
number
of shares
to be
Grant date
Type
issued
March 31, 2016
Nov 23, 2016
Jan 27, 2017
Jan 27, 2017
June 30, 2017
Jan 25, 2018
Sept 27, 2018
Jan 24, 2019
Nov 4, 2019
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options 2018-2
Stock Options
Stock Options
80,000
150,000
12,500
185,000
97,500
215,000
130,000
40,000
80,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
150,000
12,500
0
55,000
87,500
130,000
40,000
0
150,000
12,500
0
55,000
87,500
130,000
40,000
0
61,679
42,500
110,835
123,321
0
16,665
0
0
0
0
0
70,000
70,000
Nov 18, 2019
Feb 14, 2020
Feb 14, 2020
Feb 14, 2020
Jan 27, 2021
Jan 27, 2021
Jan 27, 2021
Nov 19, 2021
At December 31, 2021
Stock Options
257,500
40,000
230,000
150,000
40,000
274,500
70,000
80,000
157,500
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100,000
40,000
150,000
150,000
40,000
270,000
70,000
80,000
100,000
40,000
150,000
150,000
40,000
270,000
70,000
80,000
Stock Options 2020-1
Stock Options 2020-2
Stock Options 2020-3
Stock Options 2021-1
Stock Options 2021-2
Stock Options 2021-3
Stock Options 2021-4
0
80,000
0
0
4,500
0
0
2,122,000
607,014
139,986
1,375,000 1,375,000
Underlying assumptions used for the measurement of the compensation expense
Fair
value of
the
Stock
Options
Fair value
IFRS 2
Risk-free valuation
Strike
Expected term price
(in €)
of the
underlying
share
Type
Duration Volatility
rate
at
inception
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options 2018-2
Stock Options
Stock Options
12.55 €
6.47 €
6.76 €
6.76 €
6.61 €
6.74 €
6.82 €
5.16 €
7.55 €
7.55 €
10.38 €
10.38 €
10.38 €
6.70 €
6.70 €
6.70 €
5.63 €
5.88 €
3.15 €
3.15 €
3.27 €
3.20 €
3.27 €
3.31 €
2.40 €
3.60 €
3.66 €
4.25 €
4.25 €
4.25 €
2.51 €
5.5 years 12.55 € 10 years
6 years 6.47 € 10 years
53%
53%
53%
53%
53%
53%
53%
53%
53%
53%
44%
44%
44%
43%
43%
43%
44%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
471
472
39
605
312
679
430
96
252
558
170
977
637
101
717
183
180
5.5 years 6.76 € 10 years
6 years 6.76 € 10 years
6 years 6.61 € 10 years
6 years 6.79 € 10 years
6 years 6.82 € 10 years
5.5 years 5.16 € 10 years
6 years 7.76 € 10 years
6 years 7.04 € 10 years
6 years 10.26 € 10 years
6 years 10.26 € 10 years
6 years 10.26 € 10 years
5.5 years 6.64 € 10 years
Stock Options
Stock Options 2020-1
Stock Options 2020-2
Stock Options 2020-3
Stock Options 2021-1
Stock Options 2021-2
Stock Options 2021-3
Stock Options 2021-4
(0.70%)
(0.70%)
(0.70%)
(0.56%)
2.61 € 5.5 to 6.5 years 6.64 € 10 years
2.61 € 5.5 to 6.5 years 6.64 € 10 years
2.25 € 5.5 to 6.5 years 5.63 € 10 years
Page 213
Stock Options issued until 2018 are fully vested at December 31, 2021.
Exercise rights for Stock Options issued in January 2019, 2020 and 2021 are vested:
-
-
annually by third for Stock Options granted in 2019.
on the first anniversary date of the grant for Stock Options granted by the Board of Directors
on January 2019.
-
-
-
immediately for the Stock Options 2020-1
annually by third for the Stock Options 2020-2 and 2020-3.
annually by third for the Stock Options granted in 2021.
The exercise of the Stock Options issued is subject to a presence condition.
These plans are qualified as “equity settled”. The Group does not commit to repurchase these
instruments from beneficiaries in the event of departure or in the case of non-occurrence of a
particular event.
Founder’s share warrants (Bons de souscription de parts de créateur d’entreprise, or BSPCEs)
The following table summarizes the data relating to the founder’s share warrants as well as the
assumptions used for the measurement thereof in accordance with IFRS 2:
Number
Number of
warrants
issued
Number
of lapsed
warrants
Number of Maximum
warrants number of
outstanding shares to
be issued
of
Grant date
Type
warrants
exercised
March 12, 2014
July 29, 2016
March 31, 2017
June 30, 2017
BCE 31-10-2012
BSPCE 29-07-2016
BSPCE 31-03-2017
BSPCE 2017-2
5,000
45,000
100,000
177,500
15,000
0
3,500
1,500
0
100,000
125,834
15,000
242,334
30,000
0
100,000
125,834
15,000
270,834
45,000
0
50,000
0
0
1,666
0
Sept 21, 2017
BSPCE 2017-3
At December 31, 2021
342,500
95,000
5,166
Underlying assumptions used for the measurement of the compensation expense
Fair value
of the
underlying
share
Fair
Strike
value of Expected
the
warrants
Risk-free
rate
IFRS 2
valuation
Type
price (in Duration Volatility
€)
term
BCE 31-10-2012
BSPCE 29-07-2016
BSPCE 31-03-2017
BSPCE 2017-2
8.00 €
7.53 €
6.76 €
6.61 €
5.76 €
5.58 € 4.5 years
3.30 € 5.5 years
3.20 € 10 years
8.45 € 10 years
5.91 € 10 years
7.26 € 10 years
6.01 € 10 years
55%
53%
53%
53%
53%
1.80%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
558
99
263
532
41
2.63 €
3.04 €
2.72 €
6 years
6 years
6 years
BSPCE 2017-3
The warrants issued before the division of the nominal by 20, effective in March 2014, are convertible
to 20 ordinary shares. Consequently, the underlying fair value, the fair value of the warrant and the
exercise price have been adjusted in order to take this into account.
The exercise price for the rights attributed after the listing on the stock market is based on the mean
share price during 20 days before the award.
Page 214
The exercise rights for all founder’s share warrants are acquired annually on the grant date in
increments of one-third. The exercise of founder’s share warrants is not subject to performance
conditions. However, there is a service condition under which the beneficiary must still be an employee
or director of the Group. These plans are qualified as “equity settled” under IFRS 2. The Group does
not have an obligation to purchase these instruments from employees in the event of departure or if
a specific event does not occur.
Valuation methods of BSAs, Stock Options and BSPCEs
The fair value of warrants was determined using the Black&Scholes model. The valuation methods
used to estimate the fair value of the warrants are presented below:
for grants prior to the initial public offering on Euronext Paris, the share price used is equal to
the investors’ subscription price or by applying internal valuations; for grants after the listing
on Euronext Paris, the share price is based on the closing quoted price of the ordinary shares;
the risk-free rate is determined based on the yield on French government bonds over the term
equal to the maturity of the warrants;
the volatility is determined based on a sample of listed companies in the biotechnologies
sector, at the subscription date of the instruments and over a period equal to the lifetime of
the option.
Performance shares
Number of
perf.
shares
awarded
126,500
240,000
3,600
Number of
perf. shares
definitely
acquired
76,269
90,223
1,604
Maximum
number of
shares to be
issued
Number of
perf. shares
lapsed
Number of
perf. shares
outstanding
Valuation
of the plan
Grant date
Type
Jan 25, 2018 Perf. shares
Jan 24, 2019 Perf. shares
June 20, 2019 Perf. shares
Sept 25, 2019 Perf. shares
Jan 20, 2020 Perf. shares
Jan 27, 2021 Perf. shares
At December 31, 2021
50,231
89,115
796
0
0
3.31 - 6.74 €
3.46 - 5.16 €
3.46 - 7.04 €
5.54 - 7.76 €
6.69 - 10.84€
4.28 – 6.7€
60,662
1,200
31,666
325,450
568,900
987,878
60,662
1,200
31,666
325,450
568,900
987,878
65,000
0
33,334
0
370,000
603,250
1,408,350
44,550
34,350
219,042
0
201,430
On January 29, 2020, the Board of Directors awarded 370,000 performance shares to employees.
On January 27, 2021, the Board of Directors awarded 603,250 performance shares to employees.
For the January and June 2019 plans, the performance criteria are defined and assessed annually and
the definitive allocation of performance shares is carried on the second anniversary date of the award
for two-third and on the third anniversary date of the award for one-third. The June 2019 performance
shares acquired before the third anniversary date of the award are subject to a lock-up period until
the third anniversary date.
Each annual tranche is subject to a condition of presence and three performance conditions, each of
which conditions the obtaining of one third of the annual tranche:
-
two annual performance conditions not linked to market conditions, such that the total
number of shares delivered will depend on the level of achievement of the conditions for each
year. For each of these conditions, the probability to achieve the objective has been estimated
by management. The expense recognized as such in 2019 and 2020 was based on the number
of performance shares expected to be definitively granted by the Group. This figure has been
defined on the basis of the management estimate.
-
an annual performance condition linked to market conditions and reflected in the fair value
measurement.
Page 215
For September 2019 plan, the definitive allocation of performance shares is defined through three
tranches. The first one is based on a presence condition and vested on three years. The second one
depends on three performance conditions, for which the probability to achieve the objective has been
estimated by management. The third one is based on an annual performance condition linked to
market conditions and reflected in the fair value measurement.
For January 2020 plan, the definitive allocation of performance shares is defined through three
tranches:
-
two tranches with annual performance conditions not linked to market conditions, such that
the total number of shares delivered will depend on the level of achievement of these
conditions. For each of these conditions, the probability to achieve the objective has been
estimated by management. The expense recognized as such in 2020 is based on the number
of performance shares expected to be definitively granted by the Group. This figure has been
defined on the basis of the management estimate.
-
one tranche an annual performance condition linked to market conditions and reflected in the
fair value measurement.
For January 2021 plan, the definitive allocation of performance shares is defined through three
tranches:
-
two tranches with performance conditions not linked to market conditions, such that the total
number of shares delivered will depend on the level of achievement of these conditions. For
each of these conditions, the probability to achieve the objective has been estimated by
management. The expense recognized as such in 2021 is based on the number of performance
shares expected to be definitively granted by the Group. This figure has been defined on the
basis of the management estimate.
-
one tranche an annual performance condition linked to market conditions and reflected in the
fair value measurement.
The Board of 27 January 2021 modified the performance conditions attached to the January 2019 plan,
aligning them with the terms of the 2021 plan. In accordance with IFRS 2.27 B43, this amendment
increases the fair value of the equity instruments granted, its effects result in the recognition of the
fair value incremental, equal to the difference between the fair value of the modified equity
instrument and the fair value of the original equity instrument, both measured at the date of
amendment of the transaction.
For these plans, the fair value of the options subject to the market conditions was determined using
the Monte Carlo model. The valuation methods used to estimate the fair value of the performance
shares are specified below:
-
the price of the share used is equal to the share price on the grant date (except for the estimate
of the incremental fair value 2019 plan described above);
-
-
the risk-free rate is determined from the average life of the instruments;
the volatility was determined on the basis of a sample of listed companies in the biotechnology
sector, on the instrument's subscription date and over a period equivalent to the life of the
option.
These plans are qualified as “equity settled”. The Group does not commit to repurchase these
instruments from employees in the event of departure or in the case of non-occurrence of a particular
event.
Page 216
Breakdown of the compensation expenses accounted for under IFRS 2 for the years ended December
2020 and 2021
Expense
related to
Cumulated
Measurement expense as
Cumulated
expense as
of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2020
Cumulated
expense
as of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2021
Expense
related to
the period
ended Dec
31, 2020
Warrants (Bons de
Souscription
d'Actions, or BSAs)
Number of
warrants
outstanding
the
thereof in
accordance
with IFRS 2
of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2019
period
ended
Dec 31,
2021
BSA 31-10-2012
BSA 31-10-2012
1,500
625
72
228
72
228
72
228
72
228
BSA 25-07-2014
BSA 16-06-2015
BSA 16-06-2015
42,500
42,500
240,000
219
288
1,551
219
288
1,551
219
288
1,551
219
288
1,551
BSA 29-01-2016
BSA 29-01-2016
BSA 29-01-2016
BSA 27-01-2017
BSA 30-06-2017
BSA 2018
BSA 2019
BSA 2020
BSA 2021
42,500
42,500
42,500
50,000
25,000
75,000
100,000
100,000
100,282
904,907
121
121
220
166
66
121
121
220
166
66
121
121
220
166
66
121
121
220
166
66
256
256
256
256
Total - BSA
3,308
3,308
0
3,308
0
3,308
Expense
related to
the
period
ended
Dec 31,
2021
Cumulated
Measurement expense as
Cumulated
expense as
of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2020
Cumulated
expense
as of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2021
Founders share
warrants (Bons de
Souscription de Parts
de Créateurs
Expense
related to
the period
ended Dec
31, 2020
Number of
warrants
outstanding
thereof in
accordance
with IFRS 2
of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2019
d'Entreprise, BSPCEs)
BCE 31-10-2012
BSPCE 29-07-2016
BSPCE 31-03-2017
BSPCE 2017-2
1,500
0
100,000
125,834
15,000
558
558
99
256
495
38
558
99
263
524
41
558
99
263
524
41
99
263
532
41
7
29
3
BSPCE 2017-3
Total - BSPCE
242,334
1,492
1,445
39
1,485
1,485
Page 217
Cumulated
Number of Measuremen expense as
Cumulated
expense as
of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2020
Cumulated
expense as
of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2021
Expense
related to
the period
ended Dec
31, 2020
Expense
related to
the period
ended Dec
31, 2021
Stock
options
t thereof in
accordance
of the
period
Stock options
outstanding with IFRS 2 ended Dec
31, 2019
Stock Options
0
150,000
12,500
0
55,000
87,500
130,000
40,000
100,000
0
40,000
150,000
150,000
40,000
270,000
70,000
80,000
1,375,000
471
472
39
605
312
679
430
96
558
252
170
977
637
101
717
183
180
6,878
471
472
39
403
295
502
294
90
471
472
39
403
312
494
395
96
471
472
39
403
312
496
430
96
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
Stock Options
17
-8
101
6
268
-26
170
372
360
3
35
Stock Options 2018-2
Stock Options 2019
Stock Options 2019
Stock Options 2019
Stock Options 2020-1
Stock Options 2020-2
Stock Options 2020-3
Stock Options 2021-1
Stock Options 2021-2
Stock Options 2021-3
Stock Options 2021-4
Total - Stock Options
59
26
328
82
409
170
372
360
170
559
553
93
394
102
16
187
193
93
394
102
16
2,651
1,260
3,911
1,105
5,016
Cumulated
Number of Measurement expense
Cumulated
expense as
of the
period
ended Dec
Cumulated
expense as
of the
period
ended Dec
Expense
related to
the period
ended Dec
31, 2020
Expense
related to
the period
ended Dec
31, 2021
performance
shares
outstanding
thereof in
accordance
as of the
period
with IFRS 2 ended Dec
Performance shares
31, 2019
31, 2020
31, 2021
Perf. shares
Perf. shares
Perf. shares
Perf. shares
Perf. shares
Perf. shares
Total – Perf. shares
0
474
664
13
450
276
3
39
193
6
209
1,047
490
470
8
262
1,047
93
177
6
174
1,882
1,164
3,498
583
646
15
60,662
1,200
31,666
325,450
568,900
987,878
449
53
436
3,528
2,666
7,794
2,930
1,164
5,775
782
1,495
2,277
Total IFRS 2:
Cumulated
Measurement expense as
Cumulated
expense as
of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2020
Cumulated
expense as
of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2021
Expense
related to
the period
ended Dec
31, 2020
Expense
related to
the period
ended Dec
31, 2021
Number of
warrants
outstanding
thereof in
accordance
with IFRS 2
of the
period
ended Dec
31, 2019
Total IFRS 2
3,510,119
19,472
8,186
2,794
10,981
4,603
15,584
The total share-based compensation expense amounts to €4,603 thousand (€2,592 thousand in
“Research and development” and €2,011 thousand in “General and administrative expense,”
respectively) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2021 and €2,794 thousand (€1,275 thousand in
Page 218
“Research and development” and €1,520 thousand in “General and administrative expense,”
respectively) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
Note 14: Loans and financial liabilities
LOANS AND FINANCIAL LIABILITES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
23,172
Dec 31, 2020
13,885
IPF debt
PGE debt
Lease debt
5,830
1,092
5,621
1,479
Financial liabilities – Non-current portion
30,094
20,986
Repayable advances
Loan US
-
-
228
106
IPF debt
PGE debt
Lease debt
Derivative liabilities
Agios
4,465
194
387
153
-
1,802
293
436
691
2
Financial liabilities - Current portion
5,199
3,557
Total financial liabilities
35,293
24,542
Breakdown of financial liabilities by maturity
The maturities of financial liabilities are presented below for 2020 and 2021:
CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT LIABILITES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2020
Less than 1 From 1 to 5 Longer than
year years 5 years
15,686 1,802 13,885
Gross
amount
IPF Financial debt
PGE debt
US loan
5,914
106
1,914
691
293
106
436
691
228
2
5,621
Lease debt
1,237
242
Derivative liabilities
Repayable advances
Agios
228
2
Total financial liabilities
24,542
3,557
20,743
242
Page 219
CURRENT AND NON-CURRENT LIABILITES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Gross
Less than 1 From 1 to 5 Longer than
amount
year
years
5 years
IPF Financial debt
PGE debt
Lease debt
Derivative liabilities
Agios
27,637
4,465
23,172
5,830
1,040
6,024
1,479
153
194
387
153
52
Total financial liabilities
35,293
5,199
30,042
52
14.1 IPF Financial debt
Tranche A Tranche B Tranche C Total IPF Debt
(Amounts in K€)
-
5,846
9,841
15,686
13,500
-1,975
-282
-203
517
1,551
393
-1,551
27,637
As at December 31, 2020
Increase
Repayment
Derivative liability at inception date
Transaction costs
Capitalized interests
Cash interests
13,500
-975
-1,000
-282
-203
138
415
70
148
443
257
-443
5,276
231
693
66
-693
9,138
Effect of unwinding the discount
Interest paid
-415
13,223
As at December 31, 2021
In June 2021, following the Marketing approval of Imeglimin in Japan, the Group borrowed €13.5
million under the third and final tranche of IPF Venture Loan and issued warrants to purchase 156,250
ordinary shares with an exercise price of €6.72. The Group incurred €203 thousand of transaction costs.
These fees were included in determining the amortization of the loan using the amortized cost method.
After taking into account the transaction costs and the discount related to the 3rd tranche warrants
(€282 thousand), the effective interest rate of the bond is 9,54%.
As for Tranches A and B and as a result of the analysis of warrants under the provisions of IAS 32, no
"equity" component was found, since the conversion formula depends on an adjustment mechanism
based on share value. As a result, warrants are referred to as derivative liability recorded for their fair
value on the date of issuance. Subsequently, at each closing, change in fair value is recognized through
financial income/(loss).
The fair value of warrants was determined using the Black&Scholes model. The valuation methods
used to estimate the fair value of the warrants are presented below:
-
-
the share price is based on the closing quoted price of the ordinary shares;
the risk-free rate is determined based on the yield on French government bonds over the term
equal to the maturity of the warrants;
-
the volatility is determined based on a sample of listed companies in the biotechnologies
sector, at the subscription date of the instruments and over a period equal to the lifetime of
the option.
-
-
The main hypotheses are:
Expected term: 1.4 years.
Page 220
-
-
Volatility: 36%
Risk-free rate: (0.7)%
As of December 31, 2021:
-
-
-
For Tranche A, the derivative liability amounted to €56 thousand as compared to €377
thousand as of December 31, 2020. The decrease in fair value over the period amounts to €321
thousand.
For Tranche B, the derivative liability amounted to €50 thousand as compared to €314
thousand as of December 31, 2020. The decrease in fair value over the period amounts to €263
thousand.
For Tranche C, the derivative liability amounted to €47 as compared to €282 thousand at the
drawdown date. The decrease in fair value over the period amounts to €235 thousand.
Furthermore, the Company is subject to the following covenants at consolidated level:
-
Gearing ratio: The Group should maintain a Gearing Ratio lower than 50%. The Gearing Ratio
is measured by the ratio of total net debt (defined as total financial liabilities reduced by the
aggregate amount of cash freely and immediately available) to the market capitalization value
of the Group.
-
Cash management: The Group should maintain a minimum cash position of the highest of ten
million euros and the sum of the consolidated debt service of the Group and the amount of
cash required to be spent by the Group as part of its operations, in each case for the following
6-month period.
A breach of any of those covenants would constitute an event of default. In such a situation, the debt
would become immediately payable.
14.2 Repayable advances
The following table presents changes in conditional advances:
OSEO INNOVATION
Imeglimin
(New Formulation)
(Amounts in K€)
As at December 31, 2019
(+) Increase
359
(-) Decrease
-143
Subsidies
-
Financial expenses
As at December 31, 2020
(+) Increase
11
228
-
(-) Decrease
-232
Subsidies
Financial expenses
As at December 31, 2021
-
5
-
Page 221
Bpifrance Financement Innovation —Imeglimin (new formulation) conditional advance
At the end of 2011, the Group obtained €950 thousand in conditional, interest-free innovation aid from
Bpifrance Financement (formerly Oséo) for the development of a new formulation of Imeglimin for the
treatment of diabetes.
Payments from Bpifrance Financement were made in installments between the signature of the
contract and the end of the project (first payment of €700 thousand on January 16, 2012 and the
balance, limited to €150 thousand, on September 2nd, 2016).
Given that the technical milestone has been achieved for the project, the repayment of this conditional
advance took place between 2016 and 2021 and was terminated as of December 31, 2021.
14.3 Lease debt
Lease debt
(Amounts in K€)
As at January 1st, 2020
Increase
2,109
201
Decrease
-395
1,914
As at December 31, 2020
At December 31, 2020
Increase
1,914
-
Decrease
-436
1,479
As at December 31, 2021
14.4 PGE debt
In October 2020, the Group received the approvals from BNP Paribas, Bpifrance and CIC Lyonnaise de
Banque for a € 6 million non-dilutive financing in the form of a French Government Guarantee loan.
PGE loan
(Amounts in K€)
As at December 31, 2020
5,914
18
Capitalized interests
93
Effect of unwinding the discount
-
Other movements
As at December 31, 2021
6,024
Each loan has an initial term of one-year, with a five-year extension option. in July 2021, addendums
to the original contracts were executed to exercise this extension option and formalize a 2-year
interest-only period followed by a 4-year repayment period.
14.5 Other financial debt
In May 2020, Poxel Inc received a loan as part of the “Paycheck Protection Program” amounting to
$131 thousand (€117 thousand). The Paycheck Protection Program was a loan designed to provide a
direct incentive for small businesses in the context of the Covid-19 outbreak. Following confirmation
in early 2021 that it would not to be repaid, this loan was recognized as a subsidy and classified as a
reduction of operating expenses.
Page 222
Note 15: Employee benefits
15.1 Defined-benefit plan
Employee benefits obligations include the provision for the defined benefit plan, measured based on
the provisions stipulated under the applicable collective agreements, i.e., the French pharmaceutical
industry’s collective agreement. This commitment only applies to employees subject to French law.
In 2021, the Group applied the change in accounting treatment of the pension liability according to
IFRIC decision, presented in Note 2 Change in accounting policies.
The main actuarial assumptions used to measure the post-employment benefits are as follows:
Dec 31, 2020
Adjusted
Actuarial assumptions
Dec 31, 2021
Retirement age
Voluntary retirement at 65/67 years old
Pharmaceutical industry
Collective agreement
Discount Rate (IBoxx Corporates AA)
Mortality rate table
0.98%
INSEE 2017
2%
0.33%
INSEE 2017
2%
Salary increase rate
Turnover rate
Low
Low
Employee contribution rate
45%
45%
Changes in the projected benefit obligation for the periods presented were as follows:
PROJECTED BENEFIT OBLIGATION
Amounts in K€
Employee benefits
375
(106)
270
74
As at December 31, 2019
Impact of IFRIC agenda decision
As at January 1, 2020 - Adjusted
Service cost
Interest cost
2
Actuarial gain and losses
As at December 31, 2020 - Adjusted
Service cost
49
395
98
Interest cost
-
Actuarial gain and losses
As at December 31, 2021
(123)
370
The defined benefit plan is not supported by any plan asset.
15.2 Defined-contribution plan
The Group’s payments in relation to defined-contribution plan is recognized as expense in the
statement of loss during the period to which they relate, amounting to €424 thousand and €407
thousand respectively in 2020 and 2021.
Page 223
Note 16: Provisions
Non-current
On December 31, 2021, the Group accrued for social contributions amounting to €318 thousand. These
contributions relate to the performance shares awarded in 2019, 2020, 2021 and only for the portions
not yet acquired. They would be payable upon their definitive acquisition.
Current
The Group may be involved in legal, administrative or regulatory proceedings in the normal course of
its business. A provision is recorded by the Group as soon as it is probable that the outcome of the
litigation will result in an expense for the Group.
In connection with the application of the Merck Serono Agreement to the Roivant License Agreement,
the Company and Merck Santé had a different interpretation of a clause which allocates between them
the value of certain compensation received by the Company from partners in consideration for the
granting of rights to Merck’s intellectual property. In particular, the Parties disagreed as to whether
certain compensation received under the Roivant License Agreement and the Sumitomo Pharma
License Agreement fell within certain specific exceptions provided for in the MS Agreement (note 4).
On 18 February 2021, an Arbitral Tribunal rendered a “Final Award” concluding the ICC arbitration
between the Company and Merck Santé that led the Group to recognize a €2.4 million provision at
December 31, 2020.
In the first semester 2021, expenses for a total amount of €2.4 million have been recognized and paid
to Merck Santé, and the provision has been reversed.
On December 31, 2021, there are no other provisions recognized.
Note 17: Suppliers and other current liabilities
17.1. Trade payables
No discount was applied to payables and related accounts since the amounts did not have a maturity
over one year at the end of the current financial year.
SUPPLIERS DEBT AND OTHER RELATED ACCOUNTS
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
3,671
Dec 31, 2020
3,065
Supplier debts
Invoiced accrued
4,746
5,297
8,417
8,362
Total of supplier debts and related accounts
17.2 Tax and employee-related payables
Tax and employee-related payables are presented below:
TAX AND EMPLOYEE-RELATED PAYABLES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Staff and related accounts
1,451
743
76
2,270
1,345
731
41
2,117
Social security and other social agencies
Other taxes, dues and similar contribution
Total tax and employee-related and other current liabilities
Page 224
17.3 Other liabilities
Other liabilities amounted respectively to €15 and €14 thousand at December 31, 2021 and 2020.
Note 18: Gross Margin
18.1. Revenue
REVENUE
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
13,377
Dec 31, 2020
Sumitomo Pharma Contract
Roivant Contract
Others
6,787
18
-
20
1
13,397
6,806
Total revenue
At December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021, revenue was mainly related to the contract signed with
Sumitomo Pharma in 2017.
At December 31, 2020, revenue includes a portion of the EUR 36.0 million upfront payment received
from Sumitomo Pharma in 2017, as well as the residual Imeglimin Phase 3 program costs in Japan
incurred in 2020 that were re-invoiced to Sumitomo Pharma. Both the portion of the upfront payment
and the re-invoiced costs of the Imeglimin Phase 3 program were recognized based on the accounting
percentage of completion of this program. Revenue also includes a JPY 500 million (EUR 4.1 million)
milestone payment that Poxel received from Sumitomo Pharma following the submission of the
Imeglimin J-NDA, which has been completed and recognized in 2020 according to the IFRS15
accounting standard.
At December 31, 2021, revenue mainly includes a JPY 1,750 million (EUR 13,2 million) milestone
payment that Poxel has received from Sumitomo Pharma in July 2021 following the approval of
Imeglimin in Japan, which has been completed on June 23, 2021 as well as first royalties received in
2021 following Imeglimin commercial launch on September 16, 2021.
In the application of IFRS 15, the Group has made significant judgments in the following areas:
Assessing whether the estimate of variable consideration should be constrained
Under IFRS 15, the estimated amount of variable consideration should be included in the transaction
price only to the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal of revenue will not occur
when the contingency is subsequently resolved. The group is entitled to future development and
regulatory milestone payments, which are contingent upon successful outcome of clinical trials and
obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities. The Group has considered that such future
payments do not meet the highly probable threshold required by IFRS 15 and should therefore be
excluded from the transaction price. This is because the contingency relates to factors that are outside
of the Group’s influence and historical experience has no predictive value.
Accordingly, no revenue has been accrued for these contingent payments.
Assessing whether variable consideration should be allocated to a single specific performance
obligation
A variable consideration should be allocated directly to a specific performance obligation if the
variability relates to the entity’s efforts in satisfying the specific performance obligation, or to a specific
outcome from satisfying that performance obligation, and only if such an allocation is consistent with
the overall allocation objective in the standard. We are entitled to reimbursement of external
subcontracting costs incurred in providing the R&D service to Sumitomo Pharma. We have allocated
such cost reimbursement entirely to the R&D service. We believe it is consistent with the overall
Page 225
allocation objective, after taking in account all fixed and variable consideration and all performance
obligations in the contract.
Estimating the standalone selling price of each performance obligation
When a contract includes multiple performance obligations, the transaction price must be allocated to
the performance in proportion to their respective standalone selling prices (except in the specific
circumstances discussed above). The standalone selling price is the price at which the Group would
have sold the asset or service in a separate transaction. For example, we have allocated the fixed
portion of the Sumitomo Pharma transaction price (which includes the upfront payment) to the license
and the service in proportion to their standalone selling prices. Such standalone selling prices are not
directly observable and have been estimated as follows:
-
For the service component, the standalone selling price is determined as the expected cost
(including both internal and subcontracted costs) plus a margin consistent with what would
be expected by an independent CRO for similar services (clinical trials).
-
For the license component, the standalone service price is estimated using a discounted cash
flow approach. Inputs in the DCF estimate include: probability of success of Phase III clinical
trials and regulatory approval, drug product sales volumes and price, royalty rates, upfront
payments and milestone payments, and discount rate. These inputs are corroborated by
observable data, including: stock market analyst reports who disclosed assumptions used in
performing a DCF valuation of the Company’s Asian franchise, independent survey of
historical clinical development success rates, independent market study for Imeglimin drug,
the terms of the agreement between Poxel and Roivant (which, as compared to the
Sumitomo Pharma deal, is a separate license sale for same drug, same indication and
different territory) and information publicly released by other biotech companies about the
terms of their licensing agreements.
Accounting treatment of the Sumitomo Pharma contract:
In October 2017, the Group signed a partnership contract with Sumitomo Pharma, under which the
two companies will co-develop Imeglimin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan. Sumitomo
Pharma will fund the phase 3 development costs and the commercialization costs.
This contract provides for the following payments:
-
an initial payment of €36,031 thousand, which was collected in December 2017 and is non-
refundable;
-
reimbursement of external development costs incurred in connection with Phase 3 clinical
trials, under the conditions set out in the contract;
regulatory and sales-based milestone payments; and
sales-based royalties.
-
-
The Group determined that the contract includes two separate performance obligations:
-
Grant of license: the performance obligation is satisfied immediately for the license, as this is
a case of static licenses.
-
Co-development: the performance obligation is satisfied over time. The nature of the
performance obligation is to provide development services, primarily comprised of phase III
clinical trials. Progress-to-completion is measured by the ratio of cost incurred to total
estimated costs at completion, including both internal and external direct costs necessary to
fulfill the development obligation.
The transaction price is composed of the initial payment and the reimbursement of specified external
costs. Future regulatory milestone payments will be included into the transaction price when and if
they become highly probable. Sales-based milestone payments and royalties will be recognized when
and if Imeglimin sales occur.
Page 226
The Group allocated the transaction price between the two performance obligations as follows:
-
the reimbursement of external R&D costs has been allocated to the co-development
performance obligation as it is contingent upon the actual cost incurred by the Group in
satisfying this performance obligation, in accordance with IFRS 15.85;
-
the initial payment has been allocated based on the relative standalone selling prices of each
performance obligations. The standalone selling prices have been estimated maximizing the
use of observable inputs.
At December 31, 2020, the performance obligations related to the Sumitomo Pharma R&D services
were fulfilled at 100%.
The license agreement also provides for the payment by Sumitomo Pharma of conditional
development, regulatory and commercial milestone payments and royalties based on Imeglimin’s sales
in the territories granted. These payments fall into the category of variable counterparties
remunerating the Group’s transfer of license to Sumitomo Pharma.
-
-
-
At December 31, 2021, a JPY 1,750 million (EUR 13,2 million) milestone payment, that Poxel
received from Sumitomo Pharma following the approval of the Imeglimin in Japan, has been
reported in revenue;
At December 31, 2020, a JPY 500 million (EUR 4,144 million) milestone payment that Poxel is
received from Sumitomo Pharma upon submission of the Imeglimin J-NDA and has been
reported in revenue;
No other milestone payments based on future development milestones and regulatory
milestones are considered highly probable as of December 31, 2021. These payments will be
considered highly probable when the development of Imeglimin is sufficiently advanced to
reach the defined technical and regulatory milestones.
-
-
The milestone payments based on a level of sales as well as the royalties based on the sales of
Imeglimin benefit from the exception provided by the standard IFRS 15 relating to the royalties
on license of intellectual property. Payments and royalties are recognized as revenue as they
become due, based on sales made by Sumitomo Pharma.
At December 31, 2021, JPY 1.5 million royalties (EUR 58 thousand) have been reported
following Imeglimin commercial launch in Japan on Sept 16 2021, corresponding to 8% of
Imeglimin net sales in Japan.
18.2. Cost of sales
At December 31, 2021, cost of sales amounted to €58 thousand, corresponding to the 8% royalties on
net sales of Imeglimin in Japan due to Merck Serono, as part of the Merck Serono license agreement
to the Sumitomo Pharma partnership agreement.
Page 227
Note 19: Operating Expenses
19.1 Research and development expenses
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2020
Adjusted
Dec 31, 2021
16,270
Sub-contracting, studies and research (1)
Personnel costs
Share-based payments (2)
Travel and events
18,070
5,756
2,592
111
5,460
1,275
167
Intellectual property fees
Professional fees (3)
Other (4)
746
1,215
789
519
2,247
1,481
Research and development expenses (excluding subsidies
received)
27,479
(2,270)
(35)
29,219
(2,411)
(106)
Research tax credit
Subsidies
Subsidies classified as a reduction of research and
development expenses
(2,305)
(2,517)
(1)
Research and development expenses mainly related to studies and clinical trials for PXL770 and PXL065. The
Group conducted its studies through its network of subcontracted service providers. Compensation of these
contracts constitutes the majority of its research operating expenses. They also include the royalties that
Merck Serono has received on regulatory milestones as part of the application of the agreement with Merck
Serono to the Sumitomo Pharma partnership agreement.
(2)
(3)
(4)
Refers to note 13.
Decrease in professional fees mainly reflects non-recurring costs incurred in 2020.
Decrease in other R&D costs corresponds notably to non-reccuring costs incurred in 2020 linked to the tax
adjustment confirmed by the Administrative Court.
19.2 General and administrative expenses
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2020
Adjusted
Dec 31, 2021
3,110
Professional fees
Personnel costs
Share-based payments (1)
Insurance
2,814
3,236
2,011
905
3,640
1,520
505
Travel and events
251
229
Other
1,196
1,215
General and administrative expenses (excluding subsidies
received)
10,709
9,923
Subsidies
(82)
-
Subsidies classified as a reduction of general and
administrative expenses
10,627
9,923
(1)
Refers to note 13.
Page 228
Note 20: Employees
The Group’s average workforce during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021 was as follows:
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
49
Average number of employees
Senior staff
52
1
Non-senior staff
2
Total average number of employees
53
51
Note 21: Financial income (loss)
FINANCIAL INCOME (LOSS)
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Change in IPF derivative liability fair value
Financial expenses
Financial income
820
-2,950
48
1,278
-1,665
382
Foreign currency exchange gains (losses)
Financial income (loss)
785
-1,970
-1,975
-1,297
The financial result as of December 31, 2020 and 2021 is mainly composed of:
-
-
-
financial expenses, which mostly correspond to:
o
o
interests on IPF debt (€2,463 thousand in 2021 compared to €1,556 thousand in 2020);
interests paid to Merck in connection with the arbitration decision (€297 thousand in
2021, cf note 16);
financial income corresponding to the change in fair value of derivative instruments (an
income of €820 thousand in 2021 compared to an income of €1,278 thousand in 2020) and
income from financial investments (€48 thousand in 2021 compared to €382 thousand in
2020);
foreign currency exchange gains and losses (an income of €785 thousand compared to a loss
of €1,970 thousand in 2020).
Note 22: Income tax
The Group has not recognized deferred tax assets in the statement of financial position. As of
December 31, 2021, the amount of accumulated tax loss carryforwards since inception was €179
million with no expiration date.
Applicable French law provides that, for fiscal years ending after December 31st, 2012, the allocation
of these losses is subject to a maximum of €1 million, plus 50% of the portion of net earnings exceeding
this amount.
The unused balance of tax loss carry-forward remains deferrable in future fiscal years and may be
deferred under the same conditions without restriction of time.
The tax rate applicable to the Group for its profit excluding long-term capital gain is the rate in force
in France, i.e. 26.5%. The rate voted for future years amounts to 25% in 2022.
The tax rate applicable to the Group for its long-term capital gains and Intellectual Property related
income is the rate in force in France, in 2020 and 2021 i.e. 10%.
Page 229
The Group estimates that, to date, the probability of taxable profits being available does not allow
recognition of all or part of the balance of its tax loss carried forward.
In accordance with the principles discussed in note 3.13, no deferred tax asset is recognized in the
Group’s consolidated financial statements in excess of deferred tax liabilities.
Reconciliation between theoretical and effective tax rate
Reconciliation between theoretical and effective tax rate
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Adjusted
-31,831
-36
Net income (loss)
Income taxes
-23,763
-2
Income (loss) before tax
Statutory tax rate in France
Nominal income tax expense (benefit) under statutory French tax rate
Permanent differences
-23,760
26.5%
-6,296
710
-31,795
28%
-8,902
-94
Impact of tax rate difference
357
Unrecognized deferred tax assets on tax losses carryforwards
Income tax expense
5,323
2
9,031
36
Effective tax rate
0.0%
0.1%
The permanent differences primarily include the impact of the Research Tax Credit (which is a non-
taxable operating income).
Deferred taxes balances by nature
NATURE OF DEFERRED TAX
(Amounts in K€)
Other temporary differences
Tax losses carried forward
Deferred tax assets, net
Dec 31, 2021
199
Dec 31, 2020
147
45,031
45,230
40,982
41,129
Temporary differences related to the Roivant contract
Temporary differences related to repayable advances
Other temporary differences
-
-
1,358
1
25
1,385
261
261
Deferred tax liabilities, net
Total deferred taxes, before allowance
44,969
39,744
Non-recognized deferred taxes - allowance
-44,969
-39,744
Total deferred taxes, net recognized in the statements of financial
position
-
-
Deferred taxes in 2020 and 2021 are based on a 25% tax rate (rate applicable in 2022 and beyond).
Page 230
Note 23: Earnings per share
EARNINGS PER SHARE
Dec 31, 2021
28,642,334
Dec 31, 2020
27,528,783
Weighted average number of outstanding shares
Net income (loss) for the year
-23,763
-0.83
-31,831
-1.16
Basic earnings per share (€/share)
Diluted earnings per share (€/share)
-0.83
-1.16
Basic earnings per share
Earnings per share are calculated by dividing income attributable to equity holders of the Group by the
weighted average number of outstanding ordinary shares for the year.
Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share integrate conversion of all dilutive instruments into account in the average
number of shares outstanding potentially dilutive comprising warrants, BSPCE, stock options and
performance shares.
In 2021, 35,885,994 instruments give deferred rights to capital (BSAs, BSPCEs, stock-options and
outstanding performance shares), corresponding to 5,978,659 potential shares. These instruments are
considered to have an antidilutive effect as they reduce loss per share. Accordingly, diluted loss per
share is identical to Basic Loss per share.
Note 24: Related parties
Compensation paid to directors (CEO and board members) is presented below:
CORPORATE DIRECTORS COMPENSATION
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
(Amounts in K€)
Fixed compensation owed
Variable compensation owed
Contribution in-kind
488
117
11
450
124
13
Attendance fees-board of directors
Share-based payments
TOTAL
464
808
1,888
404
824
1,815
Terms for the allocation of variable compensation are defined based on qualitative and quantitative
objectives set at 100% for Group-level objectives.
The methods for assessing benefits relating to share-based payments is presented in Note 13.
No post-employment benefit is granted to the members of the board of directors.
Under his management agreement entered into with the Company, Mr. Thomas Kuhn (CEO) is owed
compensation related to forced departure without cause and a non-compete clause as set below:
(vi)
a compensation of one year of his fixed compensation at the date of the termination.
(vii)
if not paid yet, the earned variable compensation of the calendar year preceding the one
in which the termination occurs.
(viii)
(ix)
the earned variable compensation of the calendar year in which the termination occurs,
in proportion of his effective presence.
an amount equal to 100% of the variable compensation for the year in which the
termination date occurs, based on his fixed compensation at the date of the termination.
Page 231
(x)
a non-competition clause with a monthly compensation, during 18 months, of 50% of the
average gross remuneration he received over the course of the 12 months preceding the
termination.
Note 25: Commitments
25.1 Commitment in respect of the agreement with Merck Serono at the creation of the Group
The Group entered into a transfer and license agreement with Merck Serono on 19 March 2009
amended on 30 July 2009, 22 June 2010, 23 May 2014 and then 28 November 2014 (the “MS
Agreement”), which falls within the scope of the spin-off of Merck Serono’s research and development
activities in the cardiometabolic field.
Under the terms of the MS Contract, Merck Serono has transferred some patents and conceded other
patents and know-how in license to the Group for research and development, as well as the marketing
of pharmaceutical products. This license is exclusive for a list of 25 molecules, by program, selected by
the Group.
In consideration of the rights that have been granted in the framework of the MS Agreement, the
Group must pay to Merck Serono:
-
Royalties on net sales of products covered by the patents assigned or licensed by
Merck Serono at a high single digit rate for the Imeglimin, and at a low single digit rate
for other projects;
-
A percentage of the income from any partnership agreement relating to the drug
candidates covered by the patents granted or licensed, at a low double-digit rate. For
other products, if the Group enters into a partnership agreement, it would have to pay
over a percentage of the income from the partnership for the products covered by the
patents transferred or licensed from Merck Serono, at a rate depending on the product
and its stage of development at the time of the partnership.
25.2 Obligation under the DeuteRx contract
The Group has entered into an acquisition agreement with DeuteRx dated August 29, 2018 for DRX-
065, a drug candidate in clinical development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
(NASH), a portfolio of other deuterated drug candidates for the treatment of rare and specialty
metabolic diseases, and all associated DeuteRx industrial and intellectual property rights.
This agreement provides, for the entire product portfolio, the maximum issue of 4 million shares of
the Group for the benefit of DeuteRx, and payments related to the achievement of development,
regulatory and sales objectives of a maximum amount of US $ 545 million, a portion of which may be
realized by issuing securities of the Group. It also provides royalties at a low range on sales. The first
milestone payment corresponds to the Group's decision to initiate the Phase 3 clinical development
program for the drug candidates covered by this agreement and will be carried out exclusively through
the issuance of Group shares.
25.3 Obligation under the IPF debt
In November 2019, the Group entered into a Subscription Agreement with IPF Partners to secure
additional funding in the form of three separate bond tranches up to a total borrowing amount of €30
million and related warrants to purchase up to €4.5 million of the Company’s ordinary shares (see Note
4.1).
The bonds contain customary financial and security interest covenants.
Customary security interests are granted to the benefit of the bondholders, including a pledge on
certain intellectual property rights should the cash position is less than the sum of the consolidated
Page 232
debt service of the Group and the amount of cash required to be spent by the Group as part of its
operations, in each case for the following 9-month period.
Furthermore, the Group is subject to the following covenants:
-
-
Gearing ratio: The Group should maintain a Gearing Ratio lower than 50%. The Gearing
Ratio is measured by the ratio of total net debt to the market capitalization value of
the Group.
Cash management: The Group should maintain a minimum cash position of the highest
of ten million euros and the sum of the consolidated debt service of the Group and the
amount of cash required to be spent by the Group as part of its operations, in each
case for the following 6-month period.
A breach of any of those covenants would constitute an event of default. In such a situation, the debt
would become immediately payable.
At December 31, 2021, the Group is compliant with the above-mentioned covenants.
25.4 Other commitments related to research and partnership arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the Group regularly uses the services of subcontractors and enters
into research and partnership arrangements with various contract research organizations, or CROs,
who conduct clinical trials and studies in relation to the drug candidates, PXL770 and PXL065. The cost
of services performed by CROs is recognized as an operating expense as incurred.
Note 26: Management and assessment of financial risks
The principal financial instruments held by the Group are cash and cash equivalents, and the
receivables. The purpose of holding these instruments is to finance the ongoing business activities of
the Group. It is not the Group’s policy to invest in financial instruments for speculative purposes.
The principal risks to which the Group is exposed to are liquidity risk, foreign currency exchange risk,
interest rate risk and credit risk.
Interest rate risk
The Group has a very low exposure to interest rate risk, considering that:
-
-
-
Its liquid assets include fixed term deposits;
The repayable advances are not subject to interest rate risk;
No debt has been entered into a variable interest rate.
Credit risk
The credit risk related to the Group’s cash and cash equivalents is not significant in light of the quality
of the co-contracting financial institutions.
Foreign currency risk
The Group was exposed to foreign exchange risk taking into account the volume of transactions that it
carried out in yen in 2020 and 2021 in the framework of the co-development agreement signed with
Sumitomo Pharma. However, it covered this risk in application of the principle provided in the contract,
according to which the Group re-bills Sumitomo Pharma in the same currency as that, in which it has
been charged for its purchases.
In addition, the Group is exposed to foreign exchange risk taking into account:
Page 233
- the transactions that it carries out in dollars as part of the ongoing clinical trials in the US;
- the revenues coming from Sumitomo Pharma and received in JPY.
At this stage, the Group has not adopted any recurring mechanism of coverage to protect its activity
against currency fluctuations. From time to time, the Group may nevertheless subscribe currency term
accounts and forward sales to cover commitments and future incomes in currency as described above.
The Group may consider in the future using a suitable policy to cover exchange risks in a more
significant manner if needed.
Equity risk
The Group does not hold any equity investments or marketable securities on a regulated market.
Liquidity risk
The cash position of the Group as of December 31, 2021 amounts to € 32.3 million. Based on (i) this
cash position, (ii) the current development plan of the Group including the completion of its ongoing
Phase 2 NASH trial for PXL065 (DESTINY 1) but excluding the two identical Phase 2a clinical proof-of-
concept (POC) biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN), (iii) on
the cash forecast for the year 2022 approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, that does not
include any net sales from Imeglimin in Japan as a conservative approach, and (iv) a strict control of its
operating expenses, the Group expects that its resources will be sufficient to fund its operations and
capital expenditure requirements through at least 12 months from the reporting date (December 31,
2022). However, the Group is subject to certain financial covenants related to its debt with IPF Partners
(see note 14.1) which could be potentially breached in Q3 2022. The Group is actively pursuing various
financing options which would extend its cash runway and avoid any breach of financial covenants
through at least 12 months from the reporting date. These financing options include dilutive and non-
dilutive sources, as well as discussions with the Group’s lender, and the Group reasonably expects that
at least one of the pursued options would be completed before Q3 2022. As a consequence, the Group
2021 financials are presented on a going concern basis.
Page 234
3.3
Statutory financial statements as of December 31, 2021
3.3.1 Statutory financial statements
POXEL
Dec 31, 2021
Amort. Prov.
Dec 31, 2020
Notes
Carrying
amount
Balance sheet - assets (K€)
Amount
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Concessions, patents and similar rights
Intangible assets in progress
3
3
16,673
9
51
16,622
9
16,642
PROPERTY, PLANT & EQUIPMENT
Technical installations, equipments and tools
3
690
353
336
403
FINANCIAL ASSETS
Other investments
Other financial assets
3
3
155
441
155
11
430
17,397
665
477
17,522
1,629
TOTAL FIXED ASSETS
17,968
571
Advances, prepayments/orders
4
665
RECEIVABLES
Trade receivables
Other receivables
4
4
419
5,823
419
5,216
737
5,881
607
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Investment securities
Cash at hand
3,534
28,644
3,534
28,644
24,615
15,461
5
5
Prepaid expenses
7
720
39,805
11
720
39,198
11
858
49,181
6
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
Exchange rate adjustments on assets
TOTAL ASSETS
607
57,783
1,178
56,606
66,709
Page 235
POXEL
Notes
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Balance sheet - liabilities (in €K)
SHAREHOLDERS'S EQUITY
Share capital
Share issuance, merger and contribution premiums
Reserves
Retained earnings (deficit)
Net Income/(loss)
8
8
8
8
574
10,452
16,643
570
131,521
16,643
-91,556
8
11
10
-19,545
-29,804
TOTAL SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
8,124
27,374
OTHER EQUITY
Repayable advances
232
TOTAL OTHER EQUITY
PROVISIONS
-
232
329
2,587
LIABILITIES
Other bonds
6
6
28,849
6,011
16,810
6,008
Loans and financial liabilities
Advances and prepayments on current orders
Trade payables and related accounts
Tax and social security liabilities
Other liabilities
12
12
12
12
11,578
1,695
16
12,073
1,565
2
Deferred revenue
TOTAL LIABILITIES
48,150
4
36,458
57
Exchange rate adjustments on liabilities
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
56,606
66,709
Page 236
POXEL
Notes
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Income statement in K€
OPERATING INCOME
Revenue
Operating subsidies
Reversals of depreciation and provisions and transferred charges
Other income
14.1
14.2
13,756
6
2,608
55
7,032
137
299
TOTAL OPERATING INCOME
16,425
7,468
OPERATING EXPENSES
Other purchases and external expenses
Taxes and duties
Salaries and wages
14.3
14.3
14.3
14.3
24,740
99
4,425
1,992
25,829
71
4,208
1,772
Social security charges
OPERATING ALLOWANCES
Fixed asset depreciation expense
Provisions for contingent liability
Other charges
3
10
14.3
125
329
4,896
108
2,582
1,913
TOTAL OPERATING CHARGES
OPERATING INCOME/(LOSS)
36,607
36,484
-20,182
-29,018
Financial income
Financial expenses
15
15
1,694
3,315
1,343
3,909
FINANCIAL INCOME/(LOSS)
-1,622
-2,566
CURRENT INCOME/(LOSS) BEFORE TAX
-21,804
-31,585
Non-recurring income
Non-recurring expenses
16
16
106
117
193
823
NON-RECURRING INCOME/(LOSS)
Income taxes
-12
-2,270
-631
-2,411
17
NET INCOME/(LOSS)
-19,545
-29,804
Page 237
3.3.2 Notes to the statutory financial statements
Note 1: Presentation of the business activities and major events
The following information constitutes the Notes to the financial statements and is part of the statutory
financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021. Each of
these years has a duration of twelve months covering the period from January 1 to December 31.
1.1 Presentation of the Company
Incorporated in March 2009 as a result of a Merck Serono spin-off of its anti-diabetic drug candidates
portfolio, Poxel (hereinafter referred to as “Poxel” and together with its subsidiaries, referred to as
the “Group”) is a French joint stock company (société anonyme) governed by French law and has its
registered office located at 259/261 Avenue Jean Jaurès, Immeuble le Sunway, 69007 Lyon, France
(register Number at the company’s house: 510 970 817 RCS de LYON). The Group is developing
innovative treatments for severe chronic metabolic diseases, including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
(NASH) and rare disorders (AMN/ALD).
Except for the year in which it was incorporated and for 2018, the Group has incurred losses each year.
These losses result from internal and external research and development expenses, particularly related
to the performance of numerous preclinical and clinical trials, mainly in the context of the development
of Imeglimin, PXL770 and PXL065. In October 2017, the Group signed a first strategic partnership
agreement with Sumitomo Pharma for the development and commercialization of Imeglimin, a drug
candidate for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, in Japan, China and eleven other developing countries
in Asia. The Group has obtained additional funding in the form of a bond loan from IPF Partners. The
financing consists of three separate bond tranches: EUR 6.5 million, EUR 10 million and EUR 13.5
million, for a total amount of up to EUR 30 million, subject to the achievement of objectives
contractually defined. The three tranches were drawn down in November 2019, March 2020 and June
2021 successively. A debt covenant is attached to the contract.
Poxel future operations are highly dependent on a combination of factors, including: (i) the success of
its research and development programs; (ii) the continuation of the partnership agreements entered
into by the Group, and the amount of royalties received from these agreements (iii) securing regulatory
approvals and market access of Poxel drug candidates; (iv) the timely and successful completion of
additional funding initiatives; and (v) the development of competitive therapies by other
biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. As a result, Poxel is financed through partnerships
agreements for the development and commercialization of its drug candidates and through the
issuance of new equity or debt instruments, and may continue to do so in the short and medium term.
Page 238
1.2 Significant events
Increase in capital
Performance shares and warrants
On January 27, 2021, Poxel noted the definitive allocation of 115,731 performance shares,
representing a capital increase of €2,315 taken from the reserves.
On June 20, 2021, Poxel noted the definitive allocation of 1,604 performance shares, representing a
capital increase of €32, taken from the reserves.
On June 22, 2021, 2,875 warrants corresponding to 57,500 ordinary shares were exercised at a strike
price of €4, representing a capital increase of €1,150 with a share premium of €228,850.
On September 25, 2021, Poxel noted the definitive allocation of 33,334 performance shares,
representing a capital increase of €667, taken from the reserves
Accordingly, the share capital is €574,073.84 at December 31, 2021, divided in 28,703,692 shares of
€0.02 of nominal value.
Marketing approval of TWYMEEG® (Imeglimin) for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Japan and
milestone payment
On June 23, 2021, Poxel and Sumitomo Pharma announced that a new drug application for
TWYMEEG® Tablets 500mg (International Nonproprietary Name (INN): Imeglimin hydrochloride), for
the treatment of type 2 diabetes, was approved in Japan. Japan is the first country in the world to
approve Imeglimin.
The approval in Japan triggered a JPY 1.75 billion (approximately €13.2 million) milestone payment to
Poxel from Sumitomo Pharma that was recognized as revenue in June 2021 and paid in July 2021.
IPF Financing
In November 2019, Poxel entered into a Subscription Agreement with IPF Partners to secure additional
funding in the form of three separate bond tranches up to a total borrowing amount of €30 million
and related warrants to purchase up to €4.5 million of its ordinary shares. In November 2019 and
March 2020, Poxel borrowed €6.5 million under the first tranche and €10.0 million under the second
tranche respectively.
In June 2021, following the Marketing approval of Imeglimin in Japan, Poxel borrowed €13.5 million
under the third and final tranche of IPF Venture Loan and issued warrants to purchase 156,250 ordinary
shares with an exercise price of €6.72.
Update on Roivant partnership with Imeglimin
As part of the decision by Roivant not to advance Imeglimin into a Phase 3 program for strategic
reasons, its partnership agreement with Roivant has been terminated, effective January 31, 2021.
Roivant has returned all rights to Imeglimin to Poxel, as well as all data, materials, and information,
including FDA regulatory filings, related to the program. Roivant is not entitled to any payment from
Poxel as part of the return of the program.
Arbitration with Merck Serono
As part of the application of the agreement with Merck Serono to the partnership agreement signed
with Roivant in February 2018, Poxel and Merck Serono had a different interpretation of Poxel’s
revenue base to be subject to royalties. In April 2019, Poxel was notified that Merck Santé had initiated
an arbitral proceeding in order to resolve this difference in interpretation.
On 18 February 2021, an Arbitral Tribunal rendered a “Final Award” concluding the ICC arbitration
between Poxel and Merck Santé. The tribunal’s decision is final and the litigation has been closed
following a payment to Merck Serono for a total amount of €2.4 million (excl. VAT).
Page 239
Covid-19 outbreak
As of the date of this report, and based on publicly available information, the Company has not
identified the occurrence of any material negative effects on its business due to the COVID-19
pandemic that remains unresolved, other than the impact on the commercialization of TWYMEEG® in
Japan by the Company's partner Sumitomo Pharma. Similarly, the Company has not identified the
occurrence of any material negative effect on its business due to the recent geopolitical events in
Ukraine and Russia.However, the Company anticipates that the COVID-19 pandemic could have further
material negative impact on its business operations. The worldwide impact of COVID-19 may notably
affect Poxel internal organization and efficiency, particularly in countries where it operates and where
confinement measures are implemented by the authorities. In addition, COVID-19 as well as recent
geopolitical events in Ukraine and Russia may impact market conditions and Poxel ability to seek
additional funding or enter into partnerships. Particularly, delays in the supply of drug substance or
drug products, in the initiation or the timing of results of preclinical and/or clinical trials, as well as
delays linked to the responsiveness of regulatory authorities could occur, which could potentially have
an impact on Poxel development programs and partnered programs. The Company will continue to
proactively monitor the situation.
Exercise of the extension option for the non-dilutive French government Guaranteed loan (PGE)
In October 2020, Poxel received the approvals from BNP Paribas, Bpifrance and CIC Lyonnaise de
Banque for a € 6 million non-dilutive financing in the form of a French Government Guarantee loan.
Each loan had an initial term of one-year, with a five-year extension option.
In July 2021, addendums to the original contracts were executed to exercise this extension option and
formalize a 2-year deferred amortization period followed by a 4-year repayment period.
Page 240
Note 2: Principles, rules and accounting policies
2.1 Principles, rules and accounting policies
The financial statements have been prepared and presented in accordance with the accounting rules
in the respect of the principles laid down by Articles 121-1 and 121-5 and following of the General
Accounting Plan 2014. The accounting policies have been applied in compliance with the provisions of
the French Commercial Code, the accounting decree of November 29, 1983 and ANC regulation 2018-
07 which amend ANC Regulation 2014-03 relative to the rewriting of the General Accounting Plan
applicable to the closing of the fiscal year. The basic method used for the assessment of the elements
entered in the accounts is the method of historical costs.
The general accounting conventions have been applied, in the respect of the principle of prudence, in
accordance with the following assumptions:
Going concern
Permanence of accounting methods from one fiscal year to another; being specified that since
31 December 2015, the Company has opted for the preferred method of imputing costs
related to the capital increases occurring during the fiscal year to the share premium.
Separation of accounting periods.
The cash position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 amounts to € 32.2 million. Based on (i) this
cash position, (ii) the current development plan of the Company including the completion of its
ongoing Phase 2 NASH trial for PXL065 (DESTINY 1) but excluding the two identical Phase 2a clinical
proof-of-concept (POC) biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN),
(iii) on the cash forecast for the year 2022 approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, that
does not include any net sales from Imeglimin in Japan as a conservative approach, and (iv) a strict
control of its operating expenses, the Company expects that its resources will be sufficient to fund its
operations and capital expenditure requirements through at least 12 months from the reporting date
(December 31, 2022). However, the Company is subject to certain financial covenants related to its
debt with IPF Partners (see note 14.1) which could be potentially breached in Q3 2022. The Company
is actively pursuing various financing options which would extend its cash runway and avoid any breach
of financial covenants through at least 12 months from the reporting date. These financing options
include dilutive and non-dilutive sources, as well as discussions with the Company’s lender, and the
Company reasonably expects that at least one of the pursued options would be completed before Q3
2022. As a consequence, the Company 2021 financials are presented on a going concern basis.
For a better understanding of the accounts presented, the main modes and methods of assessment
chosen are specified below, including when:
A choice is offered by the legislation;
An exception provided by the legislation is used;
The application of an accounting prescription is not sufficient to give a faithful image;
There is an exemption from the accounting requirements.
2.2 Intangible assets
Separately acquired research and development are capitalized within "Other intangible assets"
provided that they meet the definition of an intangible asset: a resource that is (i) controlled by the
Company, (ii) expected to provide future economic benefits for the Company, and (iii) identifiable (i.e.
it is either separable or arises from contractual or legal rights).
Page 241
The first recognition criterion, relating to the likelihood of future economic benefits generated by the
intangible asset, is presumed to be achieved for research and development activities when they are
acquired separately.
In this context, amounts paid to third parties in the form of initial payments or milestone payments
relating to pharmaceutical specialties that have not yet obtained a marketing authorization are
recognized as intangible assets. These rights are amortized on a straight-line basis, after obtaining the
marketing authorization, over their useful life. Unamortized rights (before marketing authorization)
are subject to impairment tests in accordance with the procedures defined in Note 2.5.
Other Intangible assets are primarily composed of acquired software.
Costs related to the acquisition of software licenses are recognized as assets based on the costs
incurred to acquire and set up the related software. Software is amortized using the straight-line
method over a period of one to three years depending on the anticipated useful life.
The intangible assets are evaluated at the cost of their acquisition or at the cost of their production.
They are depreciated linearly over the duration of their use by the Company.
Elements
Depreciation periods
Licenses and software development
1 to 3 years
The expenditures related to the registration of patents are registered as a charge.
2.3 Property, Plant & Equipment
Property, Plant and Equipment are recognized at their acquisition cost (purchase price and directly
attributable costs) or at their production cost by the Company, as applicable.
Property, plant and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful life of the asset.
Elements
Depreciation periods
Facilities and fixtures
Computer hardware
Furniture
5 to 10 years – Straight line
1 to 3 years – Straight line
5 years – Straight line
2.4 Financial assets
The financial assets are mainly:
-
-
-
Equity interests in the Japanese and US subsidiaries created in 2018 and 2019;
the treasury part of the market liquidity contract;
sureties concerning contracts for the simple rental of premises.
2.5 Recoverable value of fixed assets
Assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized and are subject to an annual impairment test.
Depreciated assets are tested for impairment whenever there is an internal or external indication that
an asset may have lost value.
The impairment test consists in comparing the net book value of the tested asset with its recoverable
value. The test is performed per asset.
Page 242
An impairment loss is recorded in the amount of the excess of the carrying amount over the
recoverable amount of the asset. The recoverable amount of an asset is its fair value less costs to sell
or its value in use, whichever is greater
Impairment tests are performed at the end of the year for unamortized assets (whether or not there
is an indication of impairment), based on estimated cash flows determined by management. The
estimates used in calculating the recoverable value are highly sensitive and depend on assumptions
specific to the nature of the Company’s activities with regard to:
Forecast development cost, sales and cost of sales versus the Term of Patent Protection,
Discount rate: discount rates are determined on the basis of a base rate calculated for the
Company, adjusted if necessary, by a specific risk premium.
Long-term sales forecasts
Actions of competitors
Outcome of R&D activities (compound efficacy, results of clinical trials, etc)
Probability of obtaining regulatory approval
Amount and timing of projected costs to develop IP R&D into commercially viable products
Fair value less costs of disposal is the amount that can be obtained from the sale of an asset in an arm's
length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties, less the costs of exit.
Value in use is the present value of expected future cash flows expected from the continued use of an
asset and its disposal at the end of its useful life. Value in use is determined from estimated cash flows
of plans or budgets, based on the expected asset and sales development plan and discounted using
long-term after-tax market rates that reflect market estimates of the time value of money and the
specific risks of assets.
As of December 31, 2021:
The Company has no intangible assets with an indefinite life.
As explained in Note 2.2, the Company has an amortizable intangible asset related to the
acquired R&D, which amortization will start as from the obtention of the marketing
authorization. This asset has been subject to an impairment test (Note 3)
Non-current assets do not present any indication of impairment.
2.6 Other receivables
Receivables are measured at nominal value. An impairment is recognized, where applicable, on a case–
by–case basis through a provision to take into account collection difficulties which are likely to occur.
Other receivables include the nominal value of the Research Tax Credit which is recognized as a
receivable for the period corresponding to the fiscal year in which the eligible expenses that gave rise
to the tax credit were incurred.
2.7 Securities
The securities are listed in the assets for their acquisition value.
The provisions for possible depreciation are determined by comparison between the acquisition value
and the likely disposal value.
Page 243
2.8 Foreign currency
The charges and products in foreign currencies are recorded for their counter-value at the date of the
operation.
Transactions in foreign currency are translated into the Company’s functional currency by applying the
foreign exchange rate in effect at the transaction date.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into the functional
currency at the year-end closing exchange rate.
The difference resulting from the conversion of debts and claims in foreign currency to this last course
is included in the balance sheet in the positions of "conversion differences” of assets and liabilities.
The conversion differences are the subject of a provision for risks and charges by an equivalent
amount, where appropriate.
2.9 Provisions
These provisions, recorded in compliance with the CRC Regulation No. 2000-06, are recorded when
the Company has an obligation to a third party resulting from a past event that will probably result in
an outflow of resources to the third party, with no equivalent consideration expected, and for which
future cash outflows may be estimated reliably.
2.10 Employee benefits
The amounts of the future payments corresponding to the benefits granted to employees are assessed
according to an actuarial method, taking the assumptions regarding the evolution of wages, the age of
retirement and mortality. These assessments are then recognized at their present value.
These commitments are not the subject of provision but are included in the off-balance sheet
commitments.
2.11 Borrowings
The borrowings are valued at their nominal value. The costs of issuance are immediately supported.
The accruals are recorded on the liabilities side, at the rate of interest provided for in the contract.
2.12 Conditional advances and subsidies
Conditional advances
The advances received from public agencies for the financing of the research activities of the Company
or for the territorial commercial prospecting, whose refunds are conditional, are presented on the
liability side under the heading "Conditional advances" and their characteristics are detailed in note
11.
Funds received from Bpifrance Financement, the French public investment bank (formerly Oséo) in the
form of conditional advances are recognized as financial liabilities “Conditional advances”, as the
Company has a contractual obligation to reimburse in cash Bpifrance Financement for such conditional
advances, based on a repayment schedule.
Subsidies
Subsidies received are grants that are not repayable and are recognized in the income statement
where there exists reasonable assurance that the Company will comply with the conditions attached
to the subsidies and the subsidies will be received.
Subsidies that are upfront payments are presented as deferred revenue and recognized through
income up to expenses incurred as part of the research and development program to which the subsidy
relates.
Page 244
Research tax credit
The CIR (Research Tax Credit) is granted to companies by French tax authorities in order to encourage
them to conduct technical and scientific research. Companies that prove that they have expenditures
which meet the required criteria (research expenditures located in France or, since January 1, 2005,
within the European Union or in another State that is a party to the Agreement on the European
Economic Area and has concluded a tax treaty with France that contains an administrative assistance
clause) receive a tax credit that can be used for the payment of the corporate income tax due for the
fiscal year in which the expenditures were made and the next three fiscal years, or as applicable, can
be reimbursed in cash. The expenditures taken into account for the calculation of the CIR involve only
research and development expenses.
The Company has been granted CIR since its inception and receives reimbursements in cash the year
after the date of its record as a tax credit in the Company’s financial statement, pursuant to the
application of Community tax rules for small and medium firms in compliance with the regulatory texts.
The research tax credit is presented in the income statement to the credit of the line "Income tax".
2.13 Revenue
The revenue corresponds to the fair value of the consideration received or to be received for goods
and services sold in the context of the Company’s activities. It is presented net of value added tax,
returns of merchandise, rebates and reductions.
In the Company’s ordinary activities, it may enter into partnership agreements with pharmaceutical
companies. The compensation received in relation to these agreements is generally based on:
payment of a premium upon signing (i.e., upfront fees);
payments for specific developments on the achievement of regulatory milestones;
payment for research and development efforts;
Income from sale of products (royalties and sales-based payments).
When the agreement provides that the Company still has obligations to render within the scope of the
partnership, non-refundable advances are deferred and recognized as revenue staggered over the
period of the collaboration agreement.
The milestone payments represent amounts received from partners under these cooperation
agreements. Their perception depends on the achievement of certain development or objectives. The
milestone payments are recorded as profit when the generator fact occurs and that there no
conditions precedent to their payment. The generator facts can be stages of development, or even the
regulatory steps or the marketing of products derived from development work conducted in the
framework of the agreement.
The payments based on a level of sales as well as the royalties based on the sales are recognized as
revenue as they become due, based on sales made by the Company’s partner.
2.14 Industry information
The Company operates in one segment: the development of innovative treatments for severe chronic
metabolic diseases, including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and rare disorders (ALD/AMN).
2.15 Research and development expenses
Research and development costs are systematically expensed.
2.16 Financial income/(loss)
Net financial income / (loss) includes:
expenses related to interest incurred on financial liabilities;
Page 245
income related to interest received;
exchange gains or losses on foreign currency.
2.17 Non-recurring income/(loss)
The expenses and income outside of ordinary activities of the Company constitute the non-recurring
income.
2.18 Earnings per share
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the income (loss) attributable to equity holders of the
Company by the weighted average number of outstanding shares for the period.
Diluted income (loss) per share is measured by dividing the income (loss) attributable to holders of
equity and dilutive instruments by the weighted average number of outstanding shares and dilutive
instruments for the period.
In the calculation of diluted income (loss) per share, instruments giving deferred rights to capital such
as warrants may generate an antidilutive effect in the event of an income loss. In such case, these
instruments are not taken into account.
Page 246
Note 3: Intangible, tangible and financial assets
GROSS VALUES OF FIXED ASSETS
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31,
2020
Dec 31,
2021
Acquisitions
Disposals
Reclassification
Licenses
16,572
-
-
6
-
-
16,572
Software
95
0
12
9
101
9
Intangible assets in progress
Total concessions, patents and similar rights
General installations, fixtures and fittings
IT and office equipment and furniture
Total Property, Plant & Equipment
Equity interests
-
-
16,667
400
21
5
6
0
-
16,682
405
-
335
21
26
-
71
71
-
-
285
735
0
-
690
155
155
Total other investments
Treasury shares
155
0
0
0
-
155
247
3
244
Liquidity Agreement deposit
Other financial assets
113
38
4
-
75
124
3
3
-
123
Total other financial assets
TOTAL
484
45
0
0
442
18,041
51
122
17,970
Net Book
Value
Dec 31,
2021
AMORTIZATION, DEPRECIATION, AND
IMPAIRMENT OF FIXED ASSETS
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31,
2020
Dec 31,
2021
Allocation Reversal
Reclassification
Licenses
0
24
24
0
0
16,572
49
Software
33
6
51
Total concessions, patents, and similar rights
Other intangible assets
Total other intangible assets
General installations, fixtures and fittings
IT and office equipment and furniture
Fixed assets in progress
Total property, plant & equipment
Equity interests
33
6
0
51
16,621
0
0
0
45
48
0
0
0
156
197
0
0
111
220
0
249
88
71
71
9
331
155
155
6
93
0
0
353
155
155
11
346
0
Total other investments
Treasury shares
0
0
0
11
6
233
75
Liquidity Agreement deposit
Other financial assets
0
0
0
0
123
431
17,399
Total other financial assets
TOTAL
6
11
6
0
0
11
517
137
83
571
In 2018, as part of the contract signed with DeuteRx, the Company acquired a development and
commercial license to an innovative drug candidate in clinical development for the treatment of NASH
(DRX-065), as well as other programs for the treatment of metabolic diseases for a non-refundable
upfront payment of € 15,780 thousand, of which € 8,914 thousand were paid in shares and $ 8 million
(€ 6,866 thousand) were paid in cash and additional variable considerations (note 20.5). This
acquisition is recognized as an intangible asset for an amount of € 16,572 thousand, which includes €
791 thousand in acquisition costs.
The implementation of the depreciation tests described in note 2.5 did not lead to the recognition of
any impairment in the financial years presented. As part of the sensitivity tests (increase/decrease of
the Probabilities of Success to obtain marketing approval +/-2%, changes in sales +/-5%,
increase/decrease of the discount rate +/-1%), the Company has not identified any change in key
assumptions that could lead to an impairment, as the net present value of the cash flows related to
the DeuteRx intangible asset is higher than the carrying amount of the assets related to the project.
Page 247
The main assumptions retained are:
-
-
a discount rate amounting to 11%;
a cash-flow projection of 11 years (no terminal value was considered in the impairment test)
which relies on:
o
Long-term sales forecasts
o
Probabilities of success from Phase 2, which readouts are expected in Q3 2022, to
Marketing approval.
The amortization of intangible assets related to the license will commence upon generating economic
benefits.
Due to the risks and uncertainties related to the research and development process, the six capital
criteria are not considered fulfilled for any of the current development projects. As a result, all
internally generated R&D costs incurred by the company are expensed.
Note 4: Receivables and Other Receivables
Breakdown of the Company Receivables at December 31, 2021:
Dec 31, 2021
STATEMENTS OF RECEIVABLES, OTHER RECEIVABLES
(Amounts in K€)
More than one
year
Gross amount
One year maximum
Fixed assets
Other financial assets
Total fixed assets
Current assets
441
244
197
441
244
197
Advances and payments
Trade receivables
Research tax credit
Intercompany receivables
Value added tax, or VAT
Credit notes
665
419
665
419
2,228
3,288
271
2,228
3,288
271
Other receivables
Total current assets
Prepaid expenses
Total
36
6,907
720
36
6,907
720
0
0
8,068
7,871
197
In the absence of a taxable result at least equal to the amount of the claim on the State relating to the
Research Tax Credit ("CIR"), its balance is repayable the year following that of its recognition, when
the Company has the status SMEs in the European sense, which is the case for Poxel.
VAT receivables primarily relate to deductible VAT as well as VAT refund claim.
Page 248
Note 5: Cash and Cash equivalents
The cash accounts include term deposits.
Cash and cash equivalents are presented below:
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
(Amounts in K€)
Carrying value
Carrying value
Term deposits
3,534
28,644
32,178
24,615
15,461
40,076
Cash in bank and cash at hand
Total cash and cash equivalents
Note 6: Loans and financial liabilities
LOANS AND FINANCIAL LIABILITIES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
IPF debt
PGE
28,849
6,000
11
16,810
6,000
6
Other financial liabilities
Total loans and financial liabilities
34,861
22,817
IPF financial debt
In November 2019, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with IPF Partners to secure
additional funding in the form of three separate bond tranches up to a total borrowing amount of €30
million subject to the achievement of developmental milestones in Japan for Imeglimin for tranches B
and C and related warrants to purchase up to €4.5 million of the Company’s ordinary shares, with the
following characteristics :
-
The three tranches amount respectively to €6.5 million, €10 million and €13.5 million. In
June 2021, following the Marketing approval of Imeglimin in Japan, the Company
borrowed €13.5 million under the third and final tranche of IPF Venture Loan ;
the maturity of the first two tranches is five years from drawdown and the third tranche is
four years from drawdown with a quarterly redemption. First installment deferred for an
18-month period for each of tranche A and tranche B and a 12-month period for
tranche C ;
-
-
-
the bonds, when issued, bear interest rate of EURIBOR 3M + 6.5% for the first two tranches
and EURIBOR 3M + 6.0% for the third tranche, plus an additional 2% PIK interest paid on
all three tranches ;
The Company paid fees amounting to 1.5% of each tranche, at the tranche issuance.
Customary security interests are granted to the benefit of the bondholders, including a pledge on
certain intellectual property rights should the cash position be less than the sum of the consolidated
debt service of the Company and the amount of cash required to be spent by the Group as part of its
operations, in each case for the following 9-month period.
Furthermore, the Company is subject to the following covenants at consolidated level:
-
Gearing ratio: The Company should maintain a Gearing Ratio lower than 50%. The Gearing
Ratio is measured by the ratio of total net debt to the market capitalization value of the
Company.
Page 249
-
Cash management: The Company should maintain a cash position higher than the sum of the
consolidated debt service of the Company and the amount of cash required to be spent by the
Company as part of its operations, in each case for the following 6-month period.
As of December 31, 2021, and 2020, the Company was compliant with the covenants described above.
In November 2019 and March 2020, the Company borrowed €6.5 million under the first tranche and
€10.0 million under the second tranche respectively. In June 2021, following the Marketing approval
of Imeglimin in Japan, the Company borrowed €13.5 million under the third and final tranche of IPF
Venture Loan. The Company incurred €203 thousand of transaction costs.
The warrants to each bond have the following characteristics:
-
-
-
Warrants may be exercised from the issuance date until 7 years after the signing Date (ie:
November 2026, March 2027, June 2028);
One warrant is attached to each bond (6.5 million warrants were issued for tranche A, 10
million for Tranche B and 13.5 million for Tranche C);
Warrants allow to purchase 264,587 ordinary shares with an exercise price of €7.37
(Tranche A), 209,967 with and exercise price of €7.14 (Tranche B) and 156,250 ordinary
shares with an exercise price of €6.72 for Tranche C. However, the exercise price may be
amended in case of capital increase over 10 million euros (in one time or cumulatively)
from the drawdown till December 31, 2022 with a lower share price than €7.37 (Tranche
A), €7.14 (Tranche B) or €6.72 (Tranche C).
Note 7: Prepaid expenses
Prepaid expenses by nature are broken down as follows:
PREPAID EXPENSES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Real estate leases
Insurance
4
637
72
-
3
643
74
Fees, subscriptions
Studies
126
-
Travel expenses
Other
-
6
12
Total prepaid expenses
720
858
Page 250
Note 8: Shareholders’ equity
8.1 Changes in equity
The variation of the equity of analysis as follows:
Capital
Share
premiums
Retained
earnings
Capital
Shareholders'
equity
Number
of shares
Reserves
Income
POXEL
Change in equity
Amounts in K€
At December 31, 2019
Allocation of 2019 loss
2020 net result (loss)
Share issue
26,054,763
521
49
114,696
16,643 -70,316 -21,240
-21,240 21,240
-29,804
40,304
-29,804
17,853
-1,044
65
2,440,760
17,804
-1,044
65
Share issue costs
Issue of warrants
At December 31, 2020
28,495,523
570
131,521
-29,804
16,643 -91,556 -29,804
27,374
0
Allocation of 2020 loss
29,804
Allocation of premiums to
retained earnings
-91,557
91,557
0
2021 net result (loss)
Share issue
-19,545
-19,545
230
208,169
4
226
Share issue costs
Issue of warrants
At December 31, 2021
0
65
65
28,703,692
574
10,451
16,643
0
-19,545
8,124
8.2 Composition of the share capital and detail by categories of shares
Share capital is set at €574,074. As of December 31, 2021, it is divided into 28,703,692 ordinary shares
that are fully subscribed and paid up with a par value of €0.02. In 2020 and 2021, various equity
transactions occurred that modified the Company’s share capital which are further described in Note
1.2 Significant events.
COMPOSITION OF SHARE CAPITAL
Dec 31, 2021
574,074
Dec 31, 2020
569,910
Capital (in euros)
Number of shares
Nominal value (in €)
28,703,692
0.02 €
28,495,523
0.02 €
Page 251
8.3 Changes in share capital
Number of
shares
constituting
the capital
Capital
increase
in €
Number of
shares
created
Nominal
value in €
Share capital
in €
Date
Nature of operations
At December 31, 2019
0.02
521,095
2,927,335
26,611
26,054,763
26,081,374
26,137,040
28,495,523
28,495,523
28,646,192
28,703,692
28,703,692
521,095
521,627
522,741
569,910
569,910
572,923
574,074
574,074
Performance shares (Ordinary Shares)
Subscription of equity warrants
Capital increase
532
1,113
-
-
55,666
-
0.02
-
47,170
569,910
3,013
2,358,483
5,368,095
150,669
57,500
At December 31, 2020
Performance shares (Ordinary Shares)
Subscription of equity warrants
At December 31, 2021
1,150
-
574,074
5,576,264
0.02
8.4 Distribution of dividends
The Company has made no distribution of dividends during the financial years ended December 31,
2019, 2020, and 2021.
Note 9: Share warrants
9.1 Warrants (Bons de souscription d’actions, or BSAs)
Number
Number of Number
exercised of lapsed
Number of
outstanding of shares to price in
warrants
1,500
Maximum Exercise
of
Exercise
Period
Allocation date
Type
warrants
issued
warrants
warrants
be issued*
February 20, 2013
March 12, 2014
January 8, 2015
April 29, 2015
BSA 10/31/2012
BSA 10/31/2012
BSA 07-25-2014
BSA 06-16-2015
BSA 06-16-2015
BSA 01-29-2016
BSA 01-29-2016
BSA 01-29-2016
BSA 01-27-2017
BSA 06-30-2017
BSA 2018
1,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.00 € 10 years
4.00 € 10 years
4.00 € 10 years
9.37 € 10 years
9.62 € 10 years
9.05 € 10 years
9.05 € 10 years
9.26 € 10 years
7.17 € 10 years
6.90 € 10 years
6.60 € 10 years
5.20 € 10 years
2,500
2,500
30,000
12,500
42,500
42,500
240,000
42,500
42,500
42,500
50,000
25,000
75,000
100,000
1,875
625
42,500
42,500
240,000
42,500
42,500
42,500
50,000
25,000
75,000
100,000
100,000
100,282
904,907
-
42,500
42,500
240,000
42,500
42,500
42,500
62,500
25,000
90,000
120,000
120,000
100,282
975,282
-
May 7,2015
-
January 29,2016
January 29, 2016
March 31, 2016
January 27, 2017
June 30,2017
-
-
-
-
12,500
-
-
January 25, 2018
January 24, 2019
Feb 14, 2020
-
15,000
20,000
20,000
-
BSA 2019
-
BSA 2020
-
-
100,000 10.77 € 10 years
Jan 27, 2021
BSA 2021
100,282
7.06 € 10 years
At December 31, 2021
2,875
67,500
945,282
* After stock split by 20
Page 252
9.2 Founders’ share warrants (Bons de souscription de parts de créateur d’entreprise, or BSPCEs)
Number
of
exercised
BSPCE
Maximum
of shares
to be
Number
of BSPCE
issued
Number
of lapsed outstanding
BSPCE BSPCE
Number of
Exercise
price in €
Exercise
Period
Allocation date
Type
issued*
March 12, 2014
BCE 31-10-2012
BSPCE 29-07-2016
BSPCE 31-03-2017
BSPCE 2017-2
5,000
45,000
3,500
-
1,500
30,000
-
3.20 € 10 years
8.45 € 10 years
5.91 € 10 years
7.26 € 10 years
6.01 € 10 years
July 29, 2016
-
45,000
-
100,000
125,834
15,000
March 31, 2017
June 30, 2017
100,000
177,500
15,000
-
1,666
-
-
50,000
-
100,000
125,834
15,000
270,834
September 21, 2017
At December 31, 2021
BSPCE 2017-3
342,500
5,166
95,000
242,334
* After stock split by 20
9.3 Stock Options
Number
of
exercised
Stock
options
Number Number
Number
of Stock
options
issued
Maximum
number of Exercise
shares to
be issued
of
of
Exercise
Period
Allocation date
Type
lapsed
outstandi
ng Stock
options
price in €
Stock
options
March 31, 2016
November 23, 2016
January 27, 2017
January 27, 2017
June 30, 2017
Stock options
80,000
150,000
12,500
-
80,000
-
-
12.55 € 10 years
6.47 € 10 years
6.76 € 10 years
6.76 € 10 years
6.61 € 10 years
6.79 € 10 years
6.82 € 10 years
5.16 € 10 years
7.76 € 10 years
7.04 € 10 years
10.26 € 10 years
10.26 € 10 years
10.26 € 10 years
6.64 € 10 years
6.64 € 10 years
6.64 € 10 years
5.63 € 10 years
Stock options
-
-
-
150,000
12,500
-
150,000
12,500
-
Stock options
-
123,321
-
Stock options
185,000
97,500
61,679
42,500
Stock options
55,000
87,500
130,000
40,000
-
55,000
87,500
130,000
40,000
-
January 25, 2018
September 27, 2018
Jan 24, 2019
Stock options
215,000
130,000
40,000
16,665 110,835
Stock options
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Stock options
-
November 4, 2019
November 18, 2019
Feb 14, 2020
Stock options
70,000
70,000
Stock options
257,500
40,000
157,500
100,000
40,000
150,000
150,000
40,000
270,000
70,000
80,000
100,000
40,000
150,000
150,000
40,000
270,000
70,000
80,000
Stock options 2020-1
Stock options 2020-2
Stock options 2020-3
Stock option 2021-1
Stock option 2021-2
Stock option 2021-3
Stock option 2021-4
-
Feb 14, 2020
230,000
150,000
40,000
80,000
Feb 14, 2020
-
Jan 27, 2021
-
Jan 27, 2021
274,500
70,000
4,500
Jan 27, 2021
-
-
Nov 19, 2021
80,000
At December 31, 2021
2,122,000
139,986 607,014 1,375,000 1,375,000
Page 253
9.4 Performance shares
Number of
performance
shares
Number
performance
definitely
acquired
Number of
performance
shares
Maximum
number of
shares to be
issued
Number of
performance
shares lapsed
Allocation date
Type
awarded
outstanding
January 25, 2018
January 24, 2019
June 20, 2019
Performance shares
Performance shares
Performance shares
Performance shares
Performance shares
Performance shares
126,500
240,000
3,600
50,231
89,115
796
76,269
90,223
1,604
33,334
-
-
-
60,662
1,200
60,662
1,200
September 25, 2019
January 29, 2020
January 27, 2021
At December 31, 2021
65,000
-
31,666
325,450
568,900
987,878
31,666
325,450
568,900
987,878
370,000
603,250
1,408,350
44,550
34,350
219,042
-
201,430
9.5 Equity instruments granted to executives
BSA, BSPCE, Stock options and performance shares
Performance
Performance
shares,
warrants, SO
issued
allocated and
subscribed
Performance
shares,
warrants, SO
allocated and
which can be
subscribed
Performance
shares,
warrants, SO
exercable at the
closure (lapse of
time)
shares,
warrants, SO
exercable at
the closure
with
Decision to
issue the
warrants,
performance
shares, SO
Performance
shares,
warrants, SO
lapsed
Name of the
beneficiary*
Type
conditions
Performance
shares
Thomas Kuhn
Pierre Legault
Thomas Kuhn
Pierre Legault
Thomas Kuhn
Pierre Legault
Thomas Kuhn
160,000
40,000
100,000
40,000
40,000
40,000
33,300
160,000
40,000
100,000
40,000
13,334
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
27-jan 21
27-jan 21
29-jan-20
14-feb-20
24-jan-19
24-jan-19
25-jan-18
SO
-
-
Performance
shares
SO
-
Performance
shares
8,840
-
17,826
40,000
21,500
SO
Performance
shares
-
11,800
Pierre Legault
Pierre Legault
Thomas Kuhn
Pierre Legault
Pierre Legault
Pierre Legault
SO
SO
30,000
12,500
50,000
42,500
42,500
150,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30,000
12,500
50,000
42,500
42,500
150,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
25-jan-18
27-jan-17
30-jun-17
29-jan-16
31-mar-16
23-nov-16
BSPCE
BSA
BSA
SO
Note 10: Provisions
Litigation and liabilities
In connection with the application of the Merck Serono Agreement to the Roivant License Agreement,
the Company and Merck Santé had a different interpretation of a clause which allocates between them
the value of certain compensation received by the Company from partners in consideration for the
granting of rights to Merck’s intellectual property. In particular, the Parties disagreed as to whether
certain compensation received under the Roivant License Agreement and the Sumitomo Pharma
License Agreement fell within certain specific exceptions provided for in the MS Agreement.
Page 254
On 18 February 2021, an Arbitral Tribunal rendered a “Final Award” concluding the ICC arbitration
between the Company and Merck Santé that led the Company to recognize a €2.4 million provision at
December 31, 2020.
In the first semester 2021, expenses for a total amount of €2.4 million have been recognized and paid
to Merck Santé, and the provision has been reversed.
On December 31, 2021, the Company accrued for social contributions amounting to €318 thousand.
These contributions relate to the performance shares awarded in 2019, 2020, 2021 and only for the
portions not yet acquired. They would be payable upon their definitive acquisition.
In addition, at December 31, 2021 the Company recognized a provision for exchange losses of €11
thousand.
Note 11: Repayable advances
The table below shows the composition and the evolution of conditional advances:
Imeglimin
(New
Formulation)
CHANGE IN REPAYABLE ADVANCES
Total
375
(Amount in K€)
At December 31, 2019
(-) Decrease
375
-143
232
-232
0
-143
232
-232
0
At December 31, 2020
(-) Decrease
At December 31, 2021
Bpifrance Financement Innovation – Imeglimin (new formulation) conditional advance
At the end of 2011, the Company obtained €950 thousand in conditional, interest-free innovation aid
from Bpifrance Financement (formerly Oséo) for the development of a new formulation of Imeglimin
for the treatment of diabetes.
Payments from Bpifrance Financement were made in installments between the signature of the
contract and the end of the project (first payment of €700 thousand on January 16, 2012 and the
balance, limited to €150 thousand, on September 2nd, 2016).
Given that the technical milestone has been achieved for the project, the repayment of this conditional
advance took place between 2016 and 2021 and was terminated as of December 31, 2021.
Page 255
Note 12: Breakdown of financial liabilities and payables by maturity
Dec 31, 2021
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL LIABILITIES AND
PAYABLES
(Amounts in K€)
One year
maximum
More than
five years
Gross amount
1-5 years
Financial liabilities
IPF Financial debt
28,849
6,000
11
4,813
24,036
PGE
288
11
5,712
Agios
Total financial liabilities
Operating payables
34,861
5,113
29,748
-
Trade payables and related accounts
Staff and related accounts
Social security and other social agencies
Other taxes, dues and similar contributions
Other liabilities
11,578
996
11,578
996
624
624
74
74
16
16
Total operating payables
Total financial liabilities and payables
13,289
48,150
13,289
18,402
-
-
-
29,748
The Company did not use trade instruments to pay its suppliers.
Note 13: Accrued liabilities
BREAKDOWN OF ACCRUED LIABILITIES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Financial liabilities
Accrued interest
9
6
Trade payables and related accounts
Accrued supplier liabilities
7,929
9,050
9,050
Total trade payables and related accounts
Tax and social security liabilities
Personnel - provision for paid leave
Personnel accrued expenses
Social security charges payable
State - accrued liabilities
7,929
386
611
327
569
411
263
47
19
Total tax and social security liabilities
Total accrued liabilities
1,454
9,392
1,179
10,235
Page 256
Note 14: Operating income/(loss)
14.1 Revenue
REVENUE AND INCOME FROM OPERATIONS
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
13,756
Dec 31, 2020
Revenue
7,032
6,569
18
Sumitomo Pharma Contract
Roivant Contract
Management fees
Inserm
13,377
-
359
20
-
444
-
Other
1
In 2021 and 2020, revenue was mainly related to the contract signed with Sumitomo Pharma in
October 2017.
Accounting treatment of the Sumitomo Pharma contract:
In October 2017, the Company signed a partnership contract with Sumitomo Pharma, under which the
two companies will co-develop Imeglimin for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in Japan. Sumitomo
Pharma will fund the phase 3 development costs and the marketing costs.
This contract provides for the following payments:
an initial payment of €36,031 thousand, which was collected in December 2017 and is non-
refundable;
reimbursement of external development costs incurred in connection with Phase 3 clinical
trials, under the conditions set out in the contract;
regulatory and sales-based milestone payments; and
sales-based royalties.
As the contract is a co-development agreement, the initial payment and the re-invoiced costs were
reported in revenue according to the completion rate of the ph3 program TIMES in Japan. Progress-
to-completion was measured by the ratio of cost incurred to total estimated costs at completion,
including both internal and external direct costs necessary to fulfill this development.
The Company expects to achieve a positive margin on this contract. In the opposite case, a loss would
have been accrued upon termination.
For the 2020 and 2021 financial years, revenue relating to this contract amount to 6,569 K€ and 13,377
K€, respectively, of which:
1,640 K€ in 2020 under the averaging of initial payment received by the Company ;
882 K€ and 95 K€ in 2020 and 2021 respectively as chargebacks to Sumitomo Pharma for
development costs of phase 3 of Imeglimin in Japan and invoices submitted to that extent ;
JPY 500 million (EUR 4.0 million) in 2020 as milestone payment that Poxel received at
submission of the Imeglimin J-NDA ;
JPY 1,750 million (EUR 13.2 million) milestone payment that Poxel has received from Sumitomo
Pharma in July 2021 following the approval of Imeglimin in Japan, which has been completed
on June 23, 2021 as well as JPY 1.5 million (EUR 58 thousand) royalties following Imeglimin
commercial launch in Japan on Sept 16 2021, corresponding to 8% of Imeglimin net sales in
Japan ;
The license agreement also provides for the payment by Sumitomo Pharma of conditional
regulatory milestones payments, sales-based payments and royalties based on Imeglimin's
Page 257
sales in the territories granted. No other milestone payments based on future regulatory
milestones have been reached as of December 31, 2021.
14.2 Reversals of depreciation and provisions and transferred expenses
Transfers of charges constitute benefits in kind.
REVERSALS OF DEPRECIATION AND PROVISIONS AND TRANSFERRED
EXPENSES
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
(Amounts in K€)
Contribution in kind
16
5
17
0
Other transfers of charges
Reversal of provision
2,587
120
137
Total reversals of depreciation and provisions and transferred expenses
2,608
The reversal of provision mainly relates to the arbitration with Merck Santé, which was closed in 2021
(cf note 10).
14.3 Operating expenses
Research and development expenses amounted to €16.7 M in 2021 and represented the most
significant part of the total operating expense of the Company.
External costs
External costs are presented below:
External expenses
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
(Amounts in K€)
Subcontracting, studies and research
Professional fees
14,747
6,896
93
15,648
7,810
294
Travel, missions and receptions
Intellectual property fees
Other charges
747
519
2,257
24,740
1 558
25,829
Total
Subcontracted research and development expenses mostly related to studies and clinical trials for
PXL770 and PXL065, conducted by the Company through its network of subcontracted service
providers.
Taxes and duties
Taxes and duties mainly correspond to the CET tax.
Personnel costs
Breakdown of personnel costs:
Personnel costs
(Amounts in K€)
Wages
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
4,425
1,992
6,418
4,208
1,772
5,979
Social charges
Total personnel costs
The increase in personnel expenses reflects the continuous growth and development of the Company.
Page 258
Other Charges
Other charges
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
License
3,905
388
836
383
License fees
Director’s attendance fees
432
404
Others
170
290
Total
4,896
1,913
The increase in other charges mostly reflects the license cost, in connection with the royalties that
Merck Serono received in 2021 as part of the application of the agreement with Merck Serono to the
Sumitomo Pharma partnership agreement.
Note 15: Financial income/(loss)
FINANCIAL INCOME
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
333
Interests
48
10
Financial income from investments
Reversal of financial provision
Foreign exchange gains
Total financial income
12
695
303
497
1,139
1,694
1,343
FINANCIAL EXPENSES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Provision for risks
Foreign exchange losses
Interests expenses
607
306
2,403
154
2,518
1,238
3,909
Total financial expenses
3,315
The financial result as of December 31, 2020 and 2021 is mainly composed of:
-
-
-
interests on IPF debt;
exchange rate gains and losses;
interests from financial investments.
Page 259
Note 16: Non-recurring income/(loss)
NON-RECURRING INCOME
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
193
Gain on disposal of treasury shares
Prior-year income
Reversals of extraordinary amortization/depreciation of fixed assets
Total non-recurring income
65
35
6
-
-
106
193
NON-RECURRING EXPENSES
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Loss on disposal of treasury shares
Non-recurring amortization/depreciation of fixed assets
Other non-recurring expenses
106
11
0
264
6
553
823
Total non-recurring expenses
117
Other non-recurring expenses in 2020 corresponded exclusively to a tax adjustment confirmed by the
Administrative Court in early 2021.
Note 17: Income taxes
The amounts recorded in the income statement as corporate income tax are related essentially to the
Research Tax Credit (CIR) and amounted to:
€2,411 thousand in 2020.
€2,270 thousand in 2021.
As of December 31, 2021, the amount of accumulated tax loss carryforwards since inception was €179
million with no expiration date. They represent a relief in future tax debt of €45 million (based on a tax
rate of 25%). No other reprocessing will increase or reduce the future tax debt.
Applicable French law provides that, for fiscal years ending after December 31st, 2012, the allocation
of these losses is subject to a maximum of €1 million, plus 50% of the portion of net earnings exceeding
this amount.
The unused balance of tax loss carry-forward remains deferrable in future fiscal years and may be
deferred under the same conditions without restriction of time.
The tax rate applicable to the Company for its profit excluding long-term capital gain is the rate in force
in France, i.e. 26.5%. The rate voted for future years amounts to 25% in 2022.
The tax rate applicable to the Company for its long-term capital gains and Intellectual Property related
income is the rate in force in France, in 2020 and 2021 i.e. 10%.
Note 18: Earnings per share
Basic earning
Earning per share is calculated by dividing income attributable to equity holders of the company by
the weighted average number of outstanding ordinary shares for the year.
The set of instruments giving deferred right to the capital (BSA, BSPCE and bonds) are regarded as anti-
dilutive when they induce a reduction in the loss per share. In that case, the diluted loss per share is
identical to the base loss per share.
Page 260
Diluted earnings
Diluted income (loss) per share is measured by dividing the income (loss) attributable to holders of
equity and dilutive instruments by the weighted average number of outstanding shares and dilutive
instruments for the period.
In 2020 and in 2021, the set of instruments giving right to the capital in a deferred way (BSA, BSPCE
and stock options) are regarded as non-dilutive because they induce a reduction in the loss per share.
This way, the diluted loss per share in 2020 and in 2021 is identical to the base loss per share.
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
28,642,334
Dec 31, 2020
27,528,783
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
Net income for the period
-19,545,324
-0.68
-29,804 494
-1.08
Basic earnings per share (€/share)
Diluted earnings per share (€/share)
-0.68
-1.08
Note 19: Related parties
The Company has not concluded any significant transactions at unusual market conditions with related
parties.
Remuneration of executives (outside of allocation of capital instruments)
In application of Article 531-3 of the General Accounting Plan, executives of a business corporation
with a Board of Directors are the Chairman of the Board of Directors, CEO as well as directors who are
individuals or legal persons (and their permanent representatives).
Breakdown of compensation paid to executives (in K€):
Compensation of corporate officers
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Fixed compensation owed
Variable compensation owed
Contributions in-kind
Attendance fees – board of directors
TOTAL
488
117
450
124
11
13
464
404
1,080
1,163
No post-employment benefit is granted to the members of the board of directors.
Terms for the allocation of variable compensation are defined based on qualitative and quantitative
objectives set at 100% for Company-level objectives.
The methods for assessing benefits relating to share-based payments is presented in Note 9.
Under his management agreement entered into with the Company, Mr. Thomas Kuhn is owed
compensation related to forced departure without cause and a non-compete clause as set below:
(i)
a compensation of one year of his fixed compensation at the date of the termination
(ii)
if not paid yet, the earned variable compensation of the calendar year preceding the one
in which the termination occurs.
(iii)
the earned variable compensation of the calendar year in which the termination occurs,
in proportion of his effective presence.
Page 261
(iv)
(v)
an amount equal to 100% of the variable compensation for the year in which the
termination occurs, based on his fixed compensation at the date of the termination.
a non-competition clause with a monthly compensation, during 18 months, of 50% of the
average gross remuneration he received over the course of the 12 months preceding the
termination.
Note 20: Commitments
20.1 Employee benefits
Methodology of calculation
The purpose of the actuarial valuation is to produce an estimate of the present value of the
commitments of the Company in respect of severance pay to the planned retirement by the collective
agreements.
These obligations related to the legal or conventional retirement compensation have been evaluated
et December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2021. These allowances are not accrued but reported as off-
balance sheet commitments.
This amount is determined on the basis of an actuarial evaluation, which is based on the use of the
projected unit credit method, taking into account the staff tun-over and applicable mortality tables.
Actuarial assumptions
The main actuarial assumptions used for the evaluation of retirement benefits are the following:
ACTUARIAL ASSUMPTIONS
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
Retirement age
Voluntary retirement at 65/67 years old
Pharmaceutical industry
Collective agreements
Discount rate
(IBOXX Corporates AA)
0.98%
0.33%
Mortality rate table
Salary increase table
Turnover rate
INSEE 2017
2%
INSEE 2017
2%
Low
Low
Employee contribution rate
45%
45%
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
(Amounts in K€)
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020 adjusted
Commitments
370
395
In 2021, the Company applied the change in valuation of the pension liability according to IFRIC
decision.
These commitments are not covered by an assets plan.
20.2 Finance leases
The Company does not hold any financial lease contracts.
Page 262
20.3 Commercial leases
Real estate leases
In 2015, the Company entered into a commercial lease in Lyon with an effective date of July 1, 2015.
Its term is nine complete and consecutive years, until June 30, 2024. The Company has the possibility
to provide notice to terminate only every three years.
In November 2017, the Company entered into an additional commercial lease enabling it to enlarge
the office space at its headquarters, effective April 1, 2018. Its term is nine complete and consecutive
years, until March 31, 2027. The Company has the possibility to provide notice to terminate only every
three years.
In September 2019, a new commercial lease was concluded, under the same conditions as the previous
ones, to enlarge the office space in Lyon.
The Company also rents an office in Paris on a monthly basis.
Contractual obligations and commitments
The following table summarizes the Company’s commitments as at December 31, 2021:
Commitment
(Amounts in K€)
< 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
> 5 years
Total
Real estate’s leases
315
404
719
20.4 Commitment in respect of the agreement with Merck Serono at the creation of the Company
The Company entered into a transfer and license agreement with Merck Serono on March 19, 2009
amended on July 30, 2009, June 22, 2010, May 23, 2014 and then November 28, 2014 (the
“MS Agreement”), which falls within the scope of the spin-off of Merck Serono’s research and
development activities in the cardiometabolic field.
Under the terms of the MS Contract, Merck Serono has transferred some patents and conceded other
patents and know-how in license to the Company for research and development, as well as the
marketing of pharmaceutical products. This license is exclusive for a list of 25 molecules, by program,
selected by the Company.
In consideration of the rights that have been granted in the framework of the MS Agreement, the
Company must pay to Merck Serono:
Royalties on net sales of products covered by the patents assigned or licensed by Merck Serono
at a high single digit rate for the Imeglimin, and at a low single digit rate for other projects;
A percentage of the income from any partnership agreement relating to the drug candidates
covered by the patents granted or licensed, at a low double-digit rate. For other products, if
the Company enters into a partnership agreement, it would have to pay a percentage of the
income from the partnership for the products covered by the patents transferred or licensed
from Merck Serono, at a rate depending on the product and its stage of development at the
time of the partnership.
20.5 Obligation under the DeuteRx contract
The Company has entered into an acquisition agreement with DeuteRx dated August 29, 2018 for DRX-
065, a drug candidate in clinical development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
Page 263
(NASH), a portfolio of other deuterated drug candidates for the treatment of rare and specialty
metabolic diseases, and all associated DeuteRx industrial and intellectual property rights.
This agreement provides, for the entire product portfolio, the maximum issue of 4 million shares of
the Company for the benefit of DeuteRx, and payments related to the achievement of development,
regulatory and sales objectives of a maximum amount of US $ 545 million, a portion of which may be
realized by issuing securities of the Company. It also provides royalties at a low range on sales. The first
milestone payment corresponds to the Company's decision to initiate the Phase 3 clinical development
program for the drug candidates covered by this agreement and will be carried out exclusively through
the issuance of Company shares.
20.6 Obligation under the IPF debt
In November 2019, the Company entered into a Subscription Agreement with IPF Partners to secure
additional funding in the form of three separate bond tranches up to a total borrowing amount of €30
million and related warrants to purchase up to €4.5 million of the Company’s ordinary shares (see Note
1.2).
The bonds contain customary financial and security interest covenants.
Customary security interests are granted to the benefit of the bondholders, including a pledge on
certain intellectual property rights should the cash position is less than the sum of the consolidated
debt service of the Company and the amount of cash required to be spent by the Company as part of
its operations, in each case for the following 9-month period.
Furthermore, the Company is subject to the following covenants at consolidated level:
Gearing ratio: The Company should maintain a Gearing Ratio lower than 50%. The Gearing
Ratio is measured by the ratio of total net debt to the market capitalization value of the
Company.
Cash management: The Company should maintain a minimum cash position of the highest of
ten million euros and the sum of the consolidated debt service of the Company and the
amount of cash required to be spent by the Company as part of its operations, in each case for
the following 6-month period.
20.7 Other commitments related to research and partnership arrangements
In the ordinary course of business, the Company regularly uses the services of subcontractors and
enters into research and partnership arrangements with various contract research organizations, or
CROs, who conduct clinical trials and studies in relation to the drug candidates, PXL770 and PXL065.
The cost of services performed by CROs is recognized as an operating expense as incurred.
Note 21: Employees
The Company’s average workforce during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021 was as
follows:
Dec 31, 2021
Dec 31, 2020
AVERAGE NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
Senior staff
44
1
42
2
Non-senior staff
Total average number of employees
45
44
Page 264
Note 22: Subsidiaries and equity holdings
Loans and
advances
granted by
the Company last fiscal
(gross
amount)
Reserve and
retained earnings
before
appropriation of
income (loss)
Carrying
amount of
shares held
Table of
subsidiaries
(Amounts in
K€)
% of
owners
hip
Profit or
loss of
Capital
Dividends
Comments
held
year
Gross
Net
Impairment on equity
interest 154 K€
Impairment on related
receivables 607 K€
Guaranties and sureties:
none
Closing rate: 130.38
Average rate: 129.88
Impairment on equity
interest 1 K€
Impairment on related
receivables: none
Guaranties and sureties:
none
POXEL
JAPAN KK
-
154
-702
-99
100%
100%
154
-
1,364
1,924
-124
POXEL INC
(USA)
-
1
1
-
-92
Closing rate: 1.13
Average rate: 1.18
Poxel SA is the leading and consolidating company of the Group. POXEL JAPAN KK and POXEL INC are
fully consolidated.
Note 23: Post-balance sheet closing date events
None
Note 24: Management and assessment of financial risks
The principal financial instruments held by the Company are cash and cash equivalents, and the
receivables. The purpose of holding these instruments is to finance the ongoing business activities of
the Company. It is not the Company’s policy to invest in financial instruments for speculative purposes.
The Company does not use derivative financial instruments for hedging purposes.
The principal risks to which the Company is exposed to are liquidity risk, foreign currency exchange
risk, interest rate risk and credit risk.
Interest rate risk
The Company has a very low exposure to interest rate risk, considering that:
its liquid assets include fixed term deposits;
the repayable advances are not subject to interest rate risk;
no debt has been entered into at a variable interest rate.
Credit risk
The credit risk is associated with the deposits with banks and financial institutions. For its cash
investments, the Company uses first-rate financial institutions and does not bear any significant credit
risk with regard to its cash.
Foreign currency risk
The Company was exposed to foreign exchange risk taking into account the volume of transactions
that it carried out in yen in 2020 and 2021 in the framework of the co-development agreement signed
with Sumitomo Pharma. However, it covered this risk in application of the principle provided in the
Page 265
contract, according to which the Company re-bills Sumitomo Pharma in the same currency as that, in
which it has been charged for its purchases.
In addition, the Company is exposed to foreign exchange risk taking into account:
- the transactions that it carries out in dollars as part of the ongoing clinical trials in the US;
- the revenues coming from Sumitomo Pharma and received in JPY.
At this stage, the Company has not adopted any recurring mechanism of coverage to protect its activity
against currency fluctuations. From time to time, the Company may nevertheless subscribe currency
term accounts and forward sales to cover commitments and future incomes in currency as described
above.
The Company may consider in the future using a suitable policy to cover exchange risks in a more
significant manner if needed.
Equity risk
The Company does not hold any equity investments or marketable securities traded on a regulated
market.
Liquidity risk
The cash position of the Company as of December 31, 2021 amounts to € 32.2 million. Based on (i) this
cash position, (ii) the current development plan of the Company including the completion of its
ongoing Phase 2 NASH trial for PXL065 (DESTINY 1) but excluding the two identical Phase 2a clinical
proof-of-concept (POC) biomarker studies for PXL065 and PXL770 in adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN),
(iii) on the cash forecast for the year 2022 approved by the Board of Directors of the Company, that
does not include any net sales from Imeglimin in Japan as a conservative approach, and (iv) a strict
control of its operating expenses, the Company expects that its resources will be sufficient to fund its
operations and capital expenditure requirements through at least 12 months from the reporting date
(December 31, 2022). However, the Company is subject to certain financial covenants related to its
debt with IPF Partners (see note 14.1) which could be potentially breached in Q3 2022. The Company
is actively pursuing various financing options which would extend its cash runway and avoid any breach
of financial covenants through at least 12 months from the reporting date. These financing options
include dilutive and non-dilutive sources, as well as discussions with the Company’s lender, and the
Company reasonably expects that at least one of the pursued options would be completed before Q3
2022. As a consequence, the Company 2021 financials are presented on a going concern basis.
Note 25: Statutory auditors’ fees
2021
Becouze
2020
Mazars
Amounts in K€
Audit
Deloitte
Mazars
Total
Deloitte
65
Total
78
52
0
130
65
130
Other services
33
8
30
5
63
13
50
13
37
9
50
9
Required by regulation
Other services
Total audit fees
25
25
13
28
41
111
52
30
193
78
102
180
Other services: these fees correspond to services performed by the auditors in connection with specific
corporate operations.
Page 266
3.4
Auditors’ reports
3.4.1 Statutory auditors’ report on the consolidated financial statements (for the year ended
December 31, 2021)
This is a translation into English of the statutory auditors’ report on the financial statements of the
Company issued in French and it is provided solely for the convenience of English speaking users.
This statutory auditors’ report includes information required by French law, such as information
about the appointment of the statutory auditors or verification of the management report and other
documents provided to shareholders.
This report should be read in conjunction with, and construed in accordance with, French law and
professional auditing standards applicable in France.
Statutory auditors' report on the
consolidated financial statements
For the year ended December 31, 2021
To the POXEL annual general meeting,
Opinion
In compliance with the engagement entrusted to us by your annual general meeting, we have audited
the accompanying consolidated financial statements of POXEL for the year ended December 31, 2021.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets and
liabilities and of the financial position of the Group as of December 31, 2021 and of the results of its
operations for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as
adopted by the European Union.
The audit opinion expressed above is consistent with our report to the Audit Committee.
Basis for Opinion
Audit Framework
We conducted our audit in accordance with professional standards applicable in France. We believe
that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
opinion.
Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Statutory Auditors'
Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements section of our report.
Independence
We conducted our audit engagement in compliance with independence requirements of the French
Commercial Code (code de commerce) and the French Code of Ethics (code de déontologie) for
statutory auditors, for the period from January 1, 2021 to the date of our report, and specifically we
Page 267
did not provide any prohibited non-audit services referred to in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No
537/2014.
Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern
We draw attention to Note 2 “Basis of preparation – Going concern” to the consolidated financial
statements which describes the material uncertainty resulting from events or conditions that may cast
significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified
in respect of this matter.
Emphasis of matter
Without qualifying our opinion expressed above, we draw your attention to the Note 2 “Basis of
preparation – Changes in accounting policies” to the consolidated financial statements which present
the change in accounting policy regarding employee benefits according to IAS 19 standard.
Justification of Assessments – Key Audit Matters
Due to the global crisis related to the Covid-19 pandemic, the financial statements of this period have
been prepared and audited under specific conditions. Indeed, this crisis and the exceptional measures
taken in the context of the state of sanitary emergency have had numerous consequences for
companies, particularly on their operations and their financing, and have led to greater uncertainties
on their future prospects. Those measures, such as travel restrictions and remote working, have also
had an impact on the companies' internal organization and the performance of the audits.
It is in this complex and evolving context that, in accordance with the requirements of Articles L. 823-
9 and R. 823-7 of the French Commercial Code(code de commerce) relating to the justification of our
assessments, and in addition to the matter described in the “Material Uncertainty Related to Going
Concern” section, we inform you of the key audit matters relating to risks of material misstatement
that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial
statements of the current period, as well as how we addressed those risks.
These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as
a whole, approved in the conditions mentioned above, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do
not provide a separate opinion on specific items of the consolidated financial statements.
Revenues from collaboration and license agreements
Notes 3.14 “Revenue” and 18.1 “Revenue” to the consolidated financial statements
Risk identified
The Group generates revenues from collaboration agreements and licenses for its drug candidates and
its own technologies with pharmaceutical companies for a total amount of 13.4 million of euros as of
December 31, 2021.
These contracts provide for different types of payments: initial payments, payments for the
achievement of clinical and regulatory milestones, payments for the performance of research and
development services, payments based on sales milestones and royalties based on sales of marketed
products.
The method of accounting for the corresponding revenue depends, in particular, on the nature of the
performance obligations provided by Poxel and its subsidiary to their partners. A misinterpretation of
the contracts signed with the partners could lead to an inadequate accounting of the corresponding
Page 268
revenues under IFRS 15. The contracts can include services for which revenue is to be recognized
overtime based on costs incurred. In that case, management make estimates of total ultimate costs
and follow costs incurred to date for the services.
The recognition of these revenues is a key audit matter because of the change in accounting policy,
the variety of contractual clauses that impact the accounting treatment and estimates needed to
determine revenue to be recognized.
Our response
We obtained the license and partnership agreements signed with Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma and
Roivant Sciences GmbH and conducted a critical review of these elements, notably including respective
commitments of the parties, services to be provided and different types of payments.
We obtained the analyses and estimates made by management to determine the amount of revenue
related to these contracts.
We assessed the reasonableness of methods used, the estimates made by management to the identify
the performance obligations, the transaction price, the allocation of the transaction price to
performance obligations as well as the revenue recognition related to the contract.
We have examined, with the help of our specialists, the compliance with IFRS 15 as adopted by the
European Union of the accounting treatments adopted by the Company.
For the revenue recognized overtime with the percentage-of-completion method, we corroborated,
by sampling, the assumptions and data retained by management to support total costs to be incurred
with internal and external evidence (including outsourcing agreements) and costs incurred to date.
Finally, we verified that appropriate information was disclosed in the notes to the consolidated
financial statements and notably regarding the new milestone obtained from Sumitomo following the
approval for Imeglimine in Japan.
Valuation of acquired DeuteRx intangible assets
Notes 3.4 “Intangible assets”, 3.6 “Impairment of assets” and 6 “Intangible assets” to the consolidated
financial statements
Risk identified
In August 2018, Poxel acquired, through a strategic agreement with DeuteRx, the DRX-065 drug
candidate in clinical development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis ("NASH") as well
as other programs including deuterated drug candidates for the treatment of rare and specialty
metabolic diseases.
As indicated in note 3.4 “Intangible assets” to the consolidated financial statements, amounts paid to
third parties in the form of upfront or milestone payments relating to pharmaceutical specialties that
have not yet obtained marketing authorization are recorded as assets. Poxel recognized an amortizable
intangible asset for 16.6 million of euros corresponding to the initial payment of 15.8 million of euros
and 0.8 million of euros in acquisition costs.
These intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis, as from the date of marketing
authorization, over their useful life. Unamortized rights (before marketing authorization) are subject
Page 269
to an impairment test annually and/or when an impairment triggering event is identified. It is based
on a recoverable amount, determined by management based on the discounting of expected future
cash flows. Notes 3.6 “Impairment of assets” and 6 “Intangible assets” to the consolidated financial
statements describe how the impairment test is performed.
There is a risk of not passing through the various development phases and ultimately not obtaining
marketing authorization or not realizing the anticipated commercial potential. Therefore, this
impairment test is based on numerous assumptions such as the discount rate, revenue growth and the
probability of success of the research project.
We considered the assessment of the recoverable amount of this amortizable intangible asset as a key
audit matter in view of the materiality of the related asset and the high degree of judgment and
estimates that it involves on the part of management.
Our response
We examined the compliance of the methodology applied by your Company with the accounting
standards in force.
We have critically reviewed the methods used by management to determine the recoverable amount
of amortizable intangible assets, including:
reviewed the impairment test prepared by management,
reviewed the methodology used by your company and assessed the reasonableness of the
discount rate used by management,
assessed the reasonableness of the data and assumptions used, in the light of external market
and industry data and evidence obtained elsewhere during the audit, such as internal company
communications and presentations, external communications and analysts' reports,
performed a critical review of management's analysis of the sensitivity of the recoverable
amount to changes in the main assumptions used.
Finally, we verified that appropriate disclosures were made in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
Specific Verifications
We have also performed, in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the specific
verifications required by laws and regulations of the information pertaining to the Group presented in
the management report of the Board of Directors.
We have no matters to report as to its fair presentation and its consistency with the consolidated
financial statements.
Other Legal and Regulatory Verifications or Information
Format of presentation of the consolidated financial statements intended to be included in the
annual financial report
We have also verified, in accordance with the professional standard applicable in France relating to
the procedures performed by the statutory auditor relating to the annual and consolidated financial
statements presented in the European single electronic format, that the presentation of the translation
in English, reviewed by the board of Directors, of the consolidated financial statements intended to
Page 270
be included in the annual financial report mentioned in Article L. 451-1-2, I of the French Monetary
and Financial Code (code monétaire et financier), prepared under the responsibility of the General
Manager, complies with the single electronic format defined in the European Delegated Regulation No
2019/815 of 17 December 2018. As it relates to consolidated financial statements, our work includes
verifying that the tagging of the translation in English of these consolidated financial statements
complies with the format defined in the above delegated regulation.
Based on the work we have performed, we conclude that the presentation of translation in English of
the consolidated financial statements intended to be included in the annual financial report complies,
in all material respects, with the European single electronic format.
We have no responsibility to verify that the translation in English of the consolidated financial
statements that will ultimately be included by your company in the annual financial report filed with
the AMF are in agreement with those on which we have performed our work.
Appointment of the Statutory Auditors
We were appointed as statutory auditors of POXEL by the annuel general meeting held on June 24,
2020 for Deloitte & Associés and on June 23, 2021 for Becouze.
As at December 31, 2021, Deloitte & Associés and Becouze were in the 2nd year and 1st year
respectively.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Consolidated Financial
Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated financial
statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the
European Union, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the
preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether
due to fraud or error.
In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the
Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going
concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless it is expected to liquidate the Company
or to cease operations.
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the financial reporting process and the
effectiveness of internal control and risks management systems and where applicable, its internal
audit, regarding the accounting and financial reporting procedures.
The consolidated financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors.
Statutory Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of the Consolidated Financial Statements
Objectives and audit approach
Our role is to issue a report on the consolidated financial statements. Our objective is to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from
material misstatement. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that
an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards will always detect a material
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material
Page 271
if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic
decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements.
As specified in Article L. 823-10-1 of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce), our statutory
audit does not include assurance on the viability of the Company or the quality of management of the
affairs of the Company.
As part of an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the
statutory auditor exercises professional judgment throughout the audit and furthermore:
Identifies and assesses the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to fraud or error, designs and performs audit procedures responsive to those risks,
and obtains audit evidence considered to be sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for his
opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for
one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
Obtains an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the internal control.
Evaluates the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting
estimates and related disclosures made by management in the consolidated financial statements.
Assesses the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and,
based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
This assessment is based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of his audit report.
However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going
concern. If the statutory auditor concludes that a material uncertainty exists, there is a
requirement to draw attention in the audit report to the related disclosures in the consolidated
financial statements or, if such disclosures are not provided or inadequate, to modify the opinion
expressed therein.
Evaluates the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements and assesses whether
these statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair
presentation.
Obtains sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or
business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements.
The statutory auditor is responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the audit of
the consolidated financial statements and for the opinion expressed on these consolidated
financial statements.
Report to the Audit Committee
We submit a report to the Audit Committee which includes in particular a description of the scope of
the audit and the audit program implemented, as well as the results of our audit. We also report, if
any, significant deficiencies in internal control regarding the accounting and financial reporting
procedures that we have identified.
Page 272
Our report to the Audit Committeeincludes the risks of material misstatement that, in our professional
judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current
period and which are therefore the key audit matters, that we are required to describe in this report.
We also provide the Audit Committee with the declaration provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EU)
N° 537/2014, confirming our independence within the meaning of the rules applicable in France such
as they are set in particular by Articles L.822-10 to L.822-14 of the French Commercial Code (code de
commerce) and in the French Code of Ethics (code de déontologie) for statutory auditors. Where
appropriate, we discuss with the Audit Committee the risks that may reasonably be thought to bear
on our independence, and the related safeguards.
Paris and Paris-La-Défense, May 3rd, 2022
The Statutory Auditors
French original signed by
Becouze
Deloitte & Associés
Fabien BROVEDANI
Julien RAZUNGLES
Page 273
3.4.2 Statutory auditors’ report on the financial statements (for the year ended December 31, 2021)
This is a translation into English of the statutory auditors’ report on the financial statements of the
Company issued in French and it is provided solely for the convenience of English speaking users.
This statutory auditors’ report includes information required by French law, such as information
about the appointment of the statutory auditors or verification of the management report and
other documents provided to shareholders.
This report should be read in conjunction with, and construed in accordance with, French law and
professional auditing standards applicable in France.
Statutory auditors' report on the
financial statements
For the year ended December 31, 2021
To the POXEL annual general meeting,
In compliance with the engagement entrusted to us by your annual general meetings, we have audited
the accompanying financial statements of POXEL for the year ended December 31, 2021.
In our opinion, the financial statements give a true and fair view of the assets and liabilities and of the
financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2021 and of the results of its operations for the
year then ended in accordance with French accounting principles.
The audit opinion expressed above is consistent with our report to the Audit Committee.
Basis for Opinion
Audit Framework
We conducted our audit in accordance with professional standards applicable in France. We believe
that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our
opinion.
Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the "Statutory Auditors'
Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements" section of our report.
Independence
We conducted our audit engagement in compliance with independence requirements of the French
Commercial Code (code de commerce) and the French Code of Ethics (code de déontologie) for
statutory auditors, for the period from January 1, 2021 to the date of our report, and specifically we
did not provide any prohibited non-audit services referred to in Article 5(1) of Regulation (EU) No
537/2014.
Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern
We draw attention to Note 2.1 “Principles, rules and accounting policies” to the financial statements
which describes the material uncertainty resulting from events or conditions that may cast significant
Page 274
doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect
of this matter.
Justification of Assessments – Key Audit Matters
Due to the global crisis related to the Covid-19 pandemic, the financial statements of this period have
been prepared and audited under specific conditions. Indeed, this crisis and the exceptional measures
taken in the context of the state of sanitary emergency have had numerous consequences for
companies, particularly on their operations and their financing, and have led to greater uncertainties
on their future prospects. Those measures, such as travel restrictions and remote working, have also
had an impact on the companies' internal organization and the performance of the audits.
It is in this complex and evolving context that, in accordance with the requirements of Articles L. 823-
9 and R. 823-7 of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce) relating to the justification of our
assessments, we inform you of the key audit matters relating to risks of material misstatement that,
in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the
current period, as well as how we addressed those risks.
These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole,
approved in the conditions mentioned above, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not
provide a separate opinion on specific items of the financial statements.
Revenues from collaboration and license agreements
Notes 2.13 “Revenue” and 14.1 “Revenue” to the financial statements
Risk identified
The Group generates revenues from collaboration agreements and licenses for its drug candidates and
its own technologies with pharmaceutical companies for a total amount of 13.4 million of euros as of
December 31, 2021.
These contracts provide for different types of payments: initial payments, payments for the
achievement of clinical and regulatory milestones, payments for the performance of research and
development services, payments based on sales milestones and royalties based on sales of marketed
products.
The method of accounting for the corresponding revenue depends, in particular, on the nature of the
rights granted and the types of payment provided for in these contracts. A misinterpretation of the
contracts signed with the partners is likely to lead to an inadequate accounting of the corresponding
products. The contracts can include some situations in which the revue should be recognized by the
percentage-of-completion method. In this case, the management should make estimates of the costs
to complete and follow the costs expensed for these services.
Revenue recognition is considered as a key audit matter given the diversity of contractual clauses that
condition the accounting treatment and estimates necessary to determine the revenue to recognize.
Our response
We obtained the license and partnership agreements signed with Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma and
Roivant Sciences GmbH and conducted an analysis of these elements, notably including respective
commitments of the parties, services to be provided and different types of payments.
Page 275
We obtained the analyses and estimates made by management to determine the amount of revenue
related to these contracts.
We assessed the reasonableness of methods used and the estimates made by management to
determine the amount of revenue related to these contracts.
We have examined, with the help of our specialists, the compliance of the accounting treatment to the
applicable accounting standard and verified that the transactions meet the criteria of the selected
accounting treatments.
For the revenue recognized with the percentage-of-completion method, we corroborated, by
sampling, the assumptions and data retained with the internal and external documentation (including
partnership agreements) and the supporting documentation of the costs incurred.
Finally, we verified that appropriate information was disclosed in the notes to the statutory financial
statements and notably regarding the new milestone obtained from Sumitomo following the approval
for Imeglimine in Japan.
Valuation of acquired DeuteRx intangible assets
Notes 2.2 “Intangible assets”, 2.5 “Recoverable value of fixed assets” and 3 “Intangible, tangible and
financial assets” to the financial statements
Risk identified
In August 2018, Poxel acquired, through a strategic agreement with DeuteRx, the DRX-065 drug
candidate in clinical development for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis ("NASH") as well
as other programs including deuterated drug candidates for the treatment of rare and specialty
metabolic diseases.
As indicated in note 2.2 “Intangible assets” to the financial statements, amounts paid to third parties
in the form of upfront or milestone payments relating to pharmaceutical specialties that have not yet
obtained marketing authorization are recorded as assets. Poxel recognized an amortizable intangible
asset for 16.6 million of euros corresponding to the initial payment of 15.8 million of euros and 0.8
million of euros in acquisition costs.
These intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis, as from the date of marketing
authorization, over their useful life. Unamortized rights (before marketing authorization) are subject
to an impairment test annually and/or when an impairment triggering event is identified. It is based
on a recoverable amount, determined by management based on the discounting of expected future
cash flows. Notes 2.5 “Recoverable value of fixed assets” and 3 “Intangible, tangible and financial
assets” to the financial statements describe how the impairment test is performed.
There is a risk of not passing through the various development phases and ultimately not obtaining
marketing authorization or not realizing the anticipated commercial potential. Therefore, this
impairment test is based on numerous assumptions such as the discount rate, revenue growth and the
probability of success of the research project.
We considered the assessment of the recoverable amount of this amortizable intangible asset as a key
audit matter in view of the materiality of the related asset and the high degree of judgment and
estimates that it involves on the part of management.
Page 276
Our response
We examined the compliance of the methodology applied by your company with the accounting
standards in force.
We have critically reviewed the methods used by management to determine the recoverable amount
of amortizable intangible assets, including:
-
-
reviewed the impairment test prepared by management,
reviewed the methodology used by your company and assessed the reasonableness of the
discount rate used by management,
-
assessed the reasonableness of the data and assumptions used, in the light of external market
and industry data and evidence obtained elsewhere during the audit, such as internal company
communications and presentations, external communications and analysts' reports,
performed a critical review of management's analysis of the sensitivity of the recoverable
amount to changes in the main assumptions used.
-
Finally, we verified that appropriate disclosures were made in the notes to the financial statements.
Specific Verifications
We have also performed, in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the specific
verifications required by laws and regulations.
We have no matters to report as to the fair presentation and the consistency with the financial
statements of the information given in the management report of the Board of Directors and in the
other documents with respect to the financial position and the financial statements provided to the
shareholders.
We attest the fair presentation and the consistency with the financial statements of the information
relating to payment deadlines mentioned in Article D.441-6 of the French Commercial Code (code de
commerce).
Information relating to corporate governance
We attest that the section of the management report devoted to corporate governance sets out the
information required by Article L. 225-37-4 and L.22-10-10 of the French Commercial Code (code de
commerce).
Concerning the information given in accordance with the requirements of Article L. 22-10-9 of the
French Commercial Code (code de commerce) relating to remunerations and benefits received by or
awarded to the directors and any other commitments made in their favour, we have verified its
consistency with the financial statements, or with the underlying information used to prepare these
financial statements and, where applicable, with the information obtained by your Company from
controlled enterprises included in the scope of consolidation. Based on these procedures, we attest
the accuracy and fair presentation of this information.
Other Information
In accordance with French law, we have verified that the required information concerning the identity
of the shareholders and holders of the voting rights has been properly disclosed in the management
report.
Page 277
Other Legal and Regulatory Verifications or Information
Format of presentation of the financial statements intended to be included in the annual financial
report
We have also verified, in accordance with the professional standard applicable in France relating to
the procedures performed by the statutory auditor relating to the annual and consolidated financial
statements presented in the European single electronic format, that the presentation of the translation
in English, reviewed by the Board of Directors, of the financial statements intended to be included in
the annual financial report mentioned in Article L. 451-1-2, I of the French Monetary and Financial
Code (code monétaire et financier), prepared under the responsibility of the General Manager,
complies with the single electronic format defined in the European Delegated Regulation No 2019/815
of 17 December 2018.
Based on the work we have performed, we conclude that the presentation of the translation in English
of the financial statements intended to be included in the annual financial report complies, in all
material respects, with the European single electronic format.
We have no responsibility to verify that the translation in English of the financial statements that will
ultimately be included by your company in the annual financial report filed with the AMF are in
agreement with those on which we have performed our work.
Appointment of the Statutory Auditors
We were appointed as statutory auditors of POXEL by the annual general meeting held on June 24,
2020 for Deloitte & Associés and on June 23, 2021 for Becouze.
As at December 31, 2021, Deloitte & Associés and Becouze were in the 2nd year and 1st year
respectively.
Responsibilities of Management and Those Charged with Governance for the Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in
accordance with French accounting principles, and for such internal control as management
determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, management is responsible for assessing the Company’s ability
to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using
the going concern basis of accounting unless it is expected to liquidate the Company or to cease
operations.
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the financial reporting process and the
effectiveness of internal control and risks management systems and where applicable, its internal
audit, regarding the accounting and financial reporting procedures.
The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors.
Page 278
Statutory Auditors’ Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements
Objectives and audit approach
Our role is to issue a report on the financial statements. Our objective is to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement. Reasonable
assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance
with professional standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements
can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could
reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these
financial statements.
As specified in Article L. 823-10-1 of the French Commercial Code (code de commerce), our statutory
audit does not include assurance on the viability of the Company or the quality of management of the
affairs of the Company.
As part of an audit conducted in accordance with professional standards applicable in France, the
statutory auditor exercises professional judgment throughout the audit and furthermore:
Identifies and assesses the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due
to fraud or error, designs and performs audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtains
audit evidence considered to be sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for his opinion. The
risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting
from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or
the override of internal control.
Obtains an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the internal control.
Evaluates the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting
estimates and related disclosures made by management in the financial statements.
Assesses the appropriateness of management’s use of the going concern basis of accounting and,
based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or
conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
This assessment is based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of his audit report.
However, future events or conditions may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going
concern. If the statutory auditor concludes that a material uncertainty exists, there is a
requirement to draw attention in the audit report to the related disclosures in the financial
statements or, if such disclosures are not provided or inadequate, to modify the opinion expressed
therein.
Evaluates the overall presentation of the financial statements and assesses whether these
statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair
presentation
Report to the Audit Committee
We submit a report to the Audit Committee which includes in particular a description of the scope of
the audit and the audit program implemented, as well as the results of our audit. We also report, if
any, significant deficiencies in internal control regarding the accounting and financial reporting
procedures that we have identified.
Page 279
Our report to the Audit Committee Erreur ! Signet non défini. includes the risks of material misstatement that, i
n our professional judgment, were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the
current period and which are therefore the key audit matters that we are required to describe in this
report.
We also provide the Audit Committee with the declaration provided for in Article 6 of Regulation (EU)
N° 537/2014, confirming our independence within the meaning of the rules applicable in France such
as they are set in particular by Articles L. 822-10 to L. 822-14 of the French Commercial Code (code de
commerce) and in the French Code of Ethics (code de déontologie) for statutory auditors. Where
appropriate, we discuss with the Audit Committee the risks that may reasonably be thought to bear
on our independence, and the related safeguards.
Paris and Paris-La-Défense, May 3rd, 2022
The Statutory Auditors
French original signed by
Becouze
Deloitte & Associés
Fabien BROVEDANI
Julien RAZUNGLES
Page 280
3.5
Other financial information
3.5.1 Table of Poxel SA results of the last 5 years
(Amounts in K€, except for number of
share and earning per share)
Dec 31, 2017
Dec 31, 2018
Dec 31, 2019
Dec 31, 2020
Dec 31, 2021
CAPITAL AT YEAR END
Share Capital
463
517
521
570
574
Number of existing ordinary shares
23 127 428
25 856 827
26 054 763
28 495 523
28 703 692
OPERATIONS AND RESULT
Revenue exclusive of VAT
8 579
(15 053)
(3 122)
74 599
9 558
30 879
(25 884)
(4 373)
7 032
(30 175)
(2 411)
13 756
(23 834)
(2 270)
Earnings before tax, employee profit-
sharing and allocations to depreciation,
amortization and provisions
Income tax
(3 476)
11 400
Earnings after tax, employee profit-sharing
and allocations to depreciation,
amortization and provisions
(12 054)
(21 240)
(29 804)
(19 545)
EARNING PER SHARE
Earning before tax, employee profit-sharing
and allocations to depreciation,
amortization and provisions
(0,65)
(0,52)
0,37
0,44
(0,99)
(0,82)
(1,06)
1,08
(0,83)
(0,68)
Earning after tax, employee profit-sharing
and allocations to depreciation,
amortization and provisions
Average number of employees during the
financial year
20
2 090
937
27
2 421
1 164
36
3 426
1 484
42
4 208
1 772
45
4 425
1 992
Total payroll for the financial year
Cost of social benefits to pay during the
financial year
3.5.2 Date of the latest financial information
The date of the latest financial information is December 31, 2021.
Page 281
3.5.3 Dividend distribution policy
3.5.3.1 Dividends and reserves distributed by the Group in the course of the last two financial years
None.
3.5.3.2 Distribution Policy
It is not intended to initiate a policy of payment of dividends in the short term in view of the stage of
development of the Group.
3.5.4 Proposal for allocation of the profit for financial year 2021
It is proposed to allocate the loss of the Company for the financial year ended December 31, 2021 in
full to the carry-forward account.
3.5.5 Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
In accordance with the provisions of Article 223 quater of the French General Tax Code, we inform you
that the financial statements for the year under review include a sum of €9,996 corresponding to non-
tax-deductible expenses as specified in Article 39-4 of the French General Tax Code.
3.5.6 Legal and arbitration proceedings
At the date of this Universal Registration Document , for a period covering the last twelve months, with
the exception of the arbitration proceeding with Merck Serono (see Section 2.1.11 “Legal
Proceedings”) there are no governmental, judicial or arbitration procedures, which could have or have
recently had a material impact on the financial position or the profitability of the Company.
Page 282
3.5.7 Information on the time limits for payment of suppliers
In accordance with Article D.441-4 I of the French Commercial Code, the following chart describes the
invoices received and issued unpaid as of December 31, 2021 for which the term has expired:
Article D. 441-4 I.-1°: Invoices received unpaid at the
end of the financial year, for which the term has
expired
Article D. 441-4 I.-2°: Invoices issued unpaid at
the end of the financial year, for which the
term has expired
Total
(1
day
and
over)
91
days
and
91
days
and
0 day
(indicative
)
61-
90
days
Total (1
day and (indicative
over)
0 day
31-
60
days days
61-
90
1-30
days
31-60
days
1-30
days
)
over
over
(A) Late payment tranches
Number of
invoices
involved
82
23
1
0
0
Total
amount of
invoices
involved
excluding
tax
118,724
28,300 5,121
2,308
0.01%
3,601,735
0
0
0
0
15,405
3,447,282
Percentage
of total
purchases
excluding
tax for the
financial
year
13.93%
0.48%
0.11%
0.02%
14.56%
Percentage
of revenue
excluding
tax for the
financial
year
0.11%
0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
0.00% 0.00%
(B) Invoices excluded from (A) relating to disputed or unrecognized debts and receivables
Number of
excluded
invoices
Total mount
of excluded
invoices
(C) Reference payment term used (contractual or statutory - article L. 441-6 or article L. 443,1 of the French
Commercial Code)
Payment
periods
used to
calculate
late
Contractual terms: 45 days
Contractual terms: 30 days
payments
3.5.8 Material change in the financial or business position
To the knowledge of the Company, there has been no material change in the financial or business
position of the Company since December 31, 2021.
Page 283
3.5.9 Statutory auditors’ fees
2021
Becouze
2020
Mazars
Amounts in K€
Deloitte
Mazars
Total
Deloitte
Total
Audit
78
52
0
130
65
65
130
Other services
33
30
63
13
37
50
Required by regulation
Other services
Total audit fees
8
5
13
50
9
9
25
25
30
13
28
41
111
52
193
78
102
180
Other services: these fees correspond to services performed by the auditors in connection with specific
corporate operations.
Page 284
4 GOVERNANCE AND LEGAL INFORMATION
4.1
Governance
4.1.1 Administrative, management and supervisory bodies, and senior management
4.1.1.1 General information on founders, management and directors
The Company is a French société anonyme à Conseil d’administration (public limited company with a
Board of Directors), where the positions of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer are separate.
A descriptive summary of the internal regulations of the Board of Directors and specialized Committees
(the “Committees”) are set out in Sections 4.1.2.3 “Specialized Committees” of this Universal
Registration Document. The internal regulations of the Board of Directors are available on the
Company’s website.
4.1.1.1.1 Composition of the Board of Directors and the Committees
At the date of this Universal Registration Document, the Board of Directors of the Company is
composed as set forth in the table below.
First name, last name, position
(nominated for three years)
Independent
director
Date of nomination, renewal and term*
Nomination: GM of 1/29/2016
Renewal: GM of 5/9/2019
Term: OGM ruling on the financial statements
for the financial year ended 12/31/2021
Nomination: GM of 6/23/2010
Pierre Legault
Chairman of the Board of
Directors and director
No
Thomas Kuhn
Director and Chief Executive
Officer
Renewals: GM of 4/15/2014, GM of
6/30/2017, GM of 6/24/2020
Term: OGM ruling on the financial statements
for the financial year ended 12/31/2022
Nomination: GM of 10/31/2012
No
Renewals: GM of 4/15/2014, GM of
6/30/2017, GM of 6/24/2020
Term: OGM ruling on the financial statements
for the financial year ended 12/31/2022
Nomination: GM of 1/8/2015
Renewal: GM of 6/21/2018, GM of 6/23/2021
Term: OGM ruling on the financial statements
for the financial year ended 12/31/2023
Nomination: Board meeting of 3/5/2015
(ratification by GM of 6/16/2015)
Renewals: GM of 6/30/2017, GM of
6/24/2020
Khoso Baluch
Director
Yes
Yes
Richard Kender
Director
Pascale Boissel
Director
Yes
Term: OGM ruling on the financial statements
for the financial year ended 12/31/2022
Nomination: GM of 1/29/2016
Janice Bourque
Director
Renewal: GM of 5/9/2019
Yes
Yes
Term: OGM ruling on the financial statements
for the financial year ended 12/31/2021
Nomination: GM of 6/30/2017
Kumi Sato
Director
Renewal: GM of 6/24/2020
Page 285
Term: OGM ruling on the financial statements
for the financial year ended 12/31/2022
Nomination: GM of 6/23/2021
Term: OGM ruling on the financial statements
for the financial year ended 12/31/2023
John.W.Kozarich
Yes
During the 2021 financial year, the composition of the Board of Directors changed as follows:
-
-
-
On July 9, Bpifrance Participations represented by Mr. Laurent Higueret resigned from its
position as Board observer,
On June 23, the terms of office of Mr. Richard Kender as Board member was renewed for a
three-year term,
On June 23, the shareholders approved the appointment of John.W.Kozarich as Board member
for a term of office of three years.
At the date of this Universal Registration Document, the Company’s Committees are made up as
indicated in the table below:
Nominating &
Corporate
Social
Responsibility
Committee
Business
Development
Committee
Scientific
Advisory
Committee
First name, last
name, position
Audit
Committee
Compensation
Committee
Strategic
Committee
Pierre Legault
Chairman of the
Board of Directors
and director
Thomas Kuhn
Director and Chief
Member
Observer
Member
Observer
Member
Observer
Member
Observer
Member
Observer
Member
Observer
Executive Officer
Khoso Baluch
Director
--
Chairman
Member
Member
--
Member
Richard Kender
Director
Member
Chairman
Member
Member
Chairman
--
--
--
--
Member
Pascale Boissel
Director
--
--
--
--
Member
Chairman
--
--
Janice Bourque
Director
Kumi Sato
Director
--
--
--
--
Member
--
--
--
--
--
--
John. W. Kozarich
Director
Member
Directors (the “Directors”) are appointed for a renewable term of three years. The Chairman is
appointed for the length of his tenure as director.
The Company complies with the provisions of Article L. 225-37-4 Sub-paragraph 6 of the French
Commercial Code relating to the diversity policy applied to members of the Board of Directors with
regard to criteria such as age, gender or qualifications and professional experience.
According to its internal regulations adopted on March 12, 2014, as amended on June 30, 2017, the
Board of Directors guarantees the diversity of expertise and age within its members. The Company's
objective is to maintain a policy of diversity in terms of experience and parity of the Directors for future
renewal of the terms of office of Board members or the nomination of new Board members.
Page 286
To this end, a summary note on any proposed Director candidate is shared to the Board of Directors
describing its qualifications and experiences and disclosing its age. Consequently, the Directors come
from a variety of backgrounds, in terms of both geography (France, United States, Japan, Canada) and
experience. The Directors are from 48 to 72 years old with an average of 62 years old.
Members of the Board of Directors are renowned professionals in the industry in which the Company
operates and have significant financial, strategic and scientific expertise.
The Board of Directors has applied these principles to the composition of its Committees, in particular
the Audit Committee and the Governance and Compensation Committee.
The Company’s Board of Directors consists of eight members, of which three women.
The business address of the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer is the
Company’s registered office.
The business addresses of the other Directors are as follows:
Mr. Khoso Baluch: 4439 Woods Edge Court, Chantilly, VA 20151, USA;
Ms. Pascale Boissel: 31 avenue des cottages - 69300 Caluire, France;
Mr. Richard Kender: 8775 W. Orchid Island Circle Vero Beach, Florida 32963, USA;
Ms. Janice Bourque: Hercules Capital Inc., 31 St. James Avenue, Suite 790, Boston, MA
02116, USA;
Mr. John.W.Kozarich: 501 West Avenue, Austin Texas 78701, USA;
Ms. Kumi Sato: Cosmo Public Relations Corporation, Azabukaisei Building., 1-8-10
Azabudai, Minato-ku, Tokyo 106-0041 Japan.
The expertise and management experience of these persons stem from various employment and
management positions they hold and which they have previously held (refer to Sections 4.1.1.1.2
Other current corporate offices and functions” and 4.1.1.1.3 “Biographies of the Directors” of this
Universal Registration Document ).
There are no family ties between the people listed above.
Over the last five years, none of these people:
has been convicted of fraud;
has been associated in his capacity as a manager or director in a bankruptcy, receivership
or liquidation;
has been subject to a disqualification from management;
has been subject to incriminations or official public sanctions imposed by statutory or
regulatory authorities.
4.1.1.1.2 Other current corporate offices and functions
At the date of this Universal Registration Document, the other current corporate offices or functions
held by the directors, as well as the corporate offices or functions held by the directors during the last
five financial years but having ended, are:
Page 287
Current corporate offices
Nature of
Positions held in the last five years
Nature of mandate or
Name
Companies
mandate or
position
Companies
position
Pierre Legault
Syndax
Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. (2)
Member of the Forest Laboratories, Member of the Board of
Board
of Inc. (2)
Directors
Directors
NPS Pharmaceuticals, Member of the Board of
Clementia, Inc. (2)
Member of the Inc. (2)
Directors
Board
Directors
of
Regado
Inc. (2)
Biosciences Member of the Board of
Directors
Urovant Ltd. (2)
Member of the
Board of Oreo Real Estate
Directors (Lead
director)
Member of the Board of
Directors
Tobira Therapeutics Member of the Board of
Stone Sunny Isles CEO
Inc.
Inc. (2)
Directors
Chairman and Nephrogenex Inc. (2)
Member of the
Artios Pharma Ltd.
Member of the Board of
Directors
Board
of
Directors
Iroko Pharmaceuticals,
LLC (2)
Member of the Board of
Directors
Chairman and
Member of the
Board
Bicycle therapeutics
plc (2)
Armo Biosciences Inc.
(2)
of
Member of the Board of
Directors
Directors
Amolyt Pharma (1)
Semprae Inc.
Chairman and
Member of the
Chairman and Member
of the Board of Directors
Board
of
Directors
Egle Therapeutics
SA (1)
Chairman and
Member of the
Board
of
Directors
Thomas Kuhn
Khoso Baluch
Poxel Japan KK Sole Director
Poxel Inc. President
None
DaVolterra
Chairman of the CorMedix inc (2)
Board
CEO and Member of the
Board of Directors
of
Directors
Vedim Pharma S.A. Manager
(Spain)
UCB
(Spain)
Pharma
Ltd Manager
Member of the Board of
Directors, Senior Vice-
President and President
(United of the region of Europe
UCB
Inc.
States)
Chairman of the Board of
Directors
UCB
Pharma
Ab
(Sweden)
Chairman of the Board of
Directors
UCB A.E (Greece)
Page 288
Current corporate offices
Nature of
Positions held in the last five years
Name
Nature of mandate or
Companies
mandate or
position
Companies
position
Chairman of the Board of
Directors
UCB
Pharma
A.S
(Norway)
Chairman
Management Committee
of
the
UCB Pharma Sp. z.o.o.
(Poland)
Member of the Board of
Directors
UCB Pharma Ltd
Vice-President
and
President of the EMEA
region of UCB
UCB
Richard Kender
Seres
Member of the INC Research
Member of the Board of
Directors
Therapeutics, inc (2)
Board
of
Directors
Bicycle therapeutics
plc (2)
Abide Therapeutics
Member of the Board of
Directors
Member of the
Board
Directors
of
ReViral Ltd
Member of the
Board
of
Directors
Pascale Boissel
Janice Bourque
Sarterious Stedim Member of the Bioaster (1)
Deputy-Chief Executive
Officer - Administrative
and Financial Director
Biotech (1) (2)
Board
of
Directors
Innate Pharma (1) (2)
Member of the
Board
of
Directors
Hercules Capital, Inc Managing
None
(2)
Director,
Life
Sciences
The Village Bank
Member of the
Board
of
Directors
Springboard
Enterprises
Member of the
Life Science
Committee
Member of the
Committee
TBS
LLC
Technologies Consultation
Member of the
Board
of
Directors
Forsyth Institute
Co-Chairman
Crystal
Lake
Conservancy
Page 289
Current corporate offices
Nature of
Positions held in the last five years
Nature of mandate or
Name
Companies
mandate or
position
Companies
position
Member of the
Board
Community Directors
of
Hyde
Center
173 Lincoln St Condo Trustee
Association
Member of the
Commodore
Builders, Inc
Board
of
Directors
Member,
Investment
Rhia Ventures
Advisory Board
Member of the
of
Directors
Bicycle therapeutics Board
plc(2)
Kumi Sato
Cosmo
Relations
Public Chairman - CEO
None
Corporation
John.W. Kozarich Ligand
Pharmaceuticals
Chairman
ActivX
Chairman and President
Director
(LGND)
Travere
Intel Pharma (INTEC)
Curza
Chairman
Chairman
Nucorion
CEO and Director
(1): French companies
(2): Listed companies in France and/or other countries
4.1.1.1.3 Biographies of the Directors
Pierre Legault
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Pierre Legault, MBA, CA, CPA has served as member of Poxel’s Board of Directors
since January 2016 and as the Company’s chairman since March 31, 2016. Mr. Legault,
has served as chairman of the Board of Amolyt Pharma SA since December 2020, has
been chairman of the board of Artios Pharma Limited since February 2018, has been
chairman of the Board of Sitryx Therapeutics Limited since March of 2021, has served on the board of
directors of Urovant Sciences Limited as a director since July 2018 and has served as a director of
Syndax Pharmaceuticals, Inc. since January 2017 and has served as chairman of the Board of Egle
Therapeutics SA since January 2022. Mr. Legault has also previously served as a member of the boards
of directors at Clementia Pharmaceuticals Inc., Forest Laboratories, Inc., Tobira Therapeutics, Inc., NPS
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Regado Biosciences, Inc., ARMO Biosciences, Inc., Iroko Pharmaceuticals LLC,
Page 290
Cyclacel Pharmaceuticals Inc., Eckerd Pharmacy and NephroGenex, Inc., where he also served as the
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer from 2012 to 2016. From 2010 to 2012, Mr. Legault served as
the Chief Executive Officer of Prosidion Ltd., a subsidiary of Astellas Pharma Inc., and from 2009 to
2010, he served as the Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of OSI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Mr. Legault
also previously served as the Chief Executive Officer of Eckerd Pharmacy and Chief Administrative
Officer of the Rite Aid Corporation. Between 1989 and 2005, Mr. Legault held various global roles such
as President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer at legacy companies of the Sanofi-
Aventis group. Mr. Legault earned a B.B.A. in Business & International Finance from HEC Montreal, an
MBA in Marketing from McGill University and holds C.A., C.P.A. diplomas. He also studied at Harvard
Business School in their Graduate Executive MBA program.
Thomas KUHN
Chief Executive Officer, Director
Thomas Kuhn has served as CEO of the Company since 2009 and a member of the
Company's Board of Directors since 2010. He began his career with Merck KGaA in
2000 where he held various positions in clinical development, mainly in the
therapeutic area of Type 2 diabetes and was responsible, in particular, for forging
partnerships with Japanese pharmaceutical laboratories. Between 2004 and 2007, he directed Merck’s
global R&D projects with two products in Phase 2 clinical trials and all life-cycle management projects,
primarily for metformin, the current reference in diabetes treatment.
Following Merck’s acquisition of Serono in 2007, Thomas Kuhn was part of the team which refined
Merck Serono’s strategy for divesting from the diabetes therapeutic area. Thomas Kuhn initiated and
concluded the project for the transfer of Merck Serono’s assets under development in Diabetes to a
new legal entity called Poxel. Since this transfer, Thomas Kuhn has been Poxel’s Chief Executive Officer.
Mr. Kuhn holds a pharmacy degree from the University of Lyon I (France) and an M.B.A. from Ashridge
University (UK).
Khoso BALUCH
Independent director
Khoso Baluch has been a director of the Company since 2012. He retired as a Senior
Vice President and President of the Europe Region of UCB, an international
biopharmaceutical company, in 2016, after having worked there since 2008. Khoso
Baluch has been a CEO of Cormedix Inc. and retired in October 2021. Before joining UCB, Khoso Baluch
worked for Eli Lilly & Co. for 24 years, holding international positions spanning Europe, the Middle East
and the United States in general management, business development, market access and product
leadership. From 2002 to 2008, Khoso Baluch also served as Vice President of the US Diabetes and
Family Health Business Unit during his tenure at Eli Lilly. Mr. Baluch served on the board of directors
of Cormedix Inc. and also served as a member of the board of the Juvenile Diabetes Research
Foundation, Indiana Chapter. Khoso Baluch was also a member of the National Industry Advisory
Council of the American Diabetes Association and the Executive Committee of the World Federation
of Advertisers (WFA). He is the Chairman of the Board of DaVolterra. He holds a Bachelor of Sciences
Degree from the City of London University and an MBA from Cranfield University.
Page 291
Richard KENDER
Independent director
Richard Kender has served as a member of the Company’s board of directors since
2015. Mr. Kender joined Merck & Co., Inc. in 1978, and served as Merck’s Vice
President of Corporate Development from 1996 to 2000. In 2000, he was promoted to
Senior Vice President and his responsibilities were expanded to include Corporate Licensing and
Worldwide Business Development, where he managed Merck’s Mergers and Acquisitions, Licensing,
Financial Evaluation and Analysis and Global Competitive Intelligence departments. Mr. Kender left
Merck in September 2013. Mr. Kender is currently a director of Seres Therapeutics and Bicycle
Therapeutics plc. He previously served on the board of directors of Abide Therapeutics and INC
Research. He holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting from Villanova University and an M.B.A.
from Fairleigh Dickinson University.
Pascale BOISSEL
Independent director
Pascale Boissel has served as a member of the Company’s board of directors since
2015. She served as the Chief Financial Officer of EnyoPharma, a French
biotechnology company specialized in the treatment of liver diseases that also
studies other therapeutic areas using an original approach inspired by
biomimetism from May 2017 to May 2019. She serves as a director for Sartorious Stedim Biotech and
also assists small biotech companies and Life Science projects in their financial strategy and their
operations. These include Novadiscovery, a company developing InSilico models and simulations to
speed up the identification and development of new drugs for which she serves as the part time CFO.
Before that, she was the Deputy-Chief Executive Officer and Head of Finance and Administration of the
BIOASTER institute, a French not-for-profit organization that develops collaborative research programs
in the field of infectious diseases and microbiology. She held this position from March 2012 to
December 2016. From 2009 to 2012, Ms. Boissel has been the Chief Financial Officer of Ipsogen, a
molecular diagnostics company. She holds an M.B.A. from HEC (Paris) and is also a certified accountant.
Janice BOURQUE
Independent director
Janice Bourque has served as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors since
January 2016. She has served as the Managing Director, Life Sciences of Hercules
Technology Growth Capital Inc., a technology and life science specialty finance
company, since 2010. From 2009 to 2010, Ms. Bourque served as a consultant for Commons Capital,
where she engaged in fund raising. From 2005 to 2009, she served as the Senior Vice President and
Group Head-Life Sciences at Comerica Bank in Boston, Massachusetts. Ms. Bourque also held the
position of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Massachusetts Biotechnology Council, the
oldest biotechnology trade association in the world, where she was instrumental in its growth from
1992-2004. Ms. Bourque currently serves on the Board of Directors and on the Audit, Governance and
Compensation Committees of both the Village Bank and (as a director) Bicycle Therapeutics plc. Ms.
Bourque holds an M.B.A. in Finance and Accounting from the University of New Hampshire and a
bachelor’s degree in Veterinary Science.
Page 292
Kumi SATO
Independent director
Kumi Sato has served as a director of Poxel SA since June 2017. For over 35 years, Ms.
Sato has led and directed COSMO Public Relations Corporation, an independent
public relations and strategic communications firm based in Tokyo with a specialized
healthcare division, COSMO Healthcare. She also holds numerous external roles,
including Project Evaluation Panel member of Japan Agency for Medical Research and
Development (AMED) since 2018, Board member of NPO’s including Foundation of Global Life Learning
Center and others. She is a member of the Global Council for the New York-based Asia Society since
2007, and is a member of the Advisory Board of the Japan Football Association. In 2015, she was
appointed Chairman Emeritus of the American Chamber of Commerce in Japan.She is former professor
but continues as a lecturer, at the Graduate School of Business, ( BBT), and is an author of two business
text books on the topics of CSR and Communication strategies. She began her career with McKinsey &
Co. in New York and obtained a Bachelor of Arts in from Wellesley College in Massachusetts
John W. KOZARICH
Independent director
John Kozarich has over 40 years of experience in the biopharmaceutical industry and
academia. He is CEO of Nucorion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Distinguished Scientist
Emeritus at ActivX Biosciences, Inc. (La Jolla, CA), and an Adjunct Professor in the
College of Pharmacy at the University of Texas, Austin. At ActivX, he was Chairman
and President from 2004 to 2017 and served in senior management positions since
2001. Dr. Kozarich was Vice President at Merck Research Laboratories (1992-2001) where he was
responsible for a variety of drug discovery and development programs and external biotech
collaborations. Previously, he held full professorships at the University of Maryland and Yale School of
Medicine. He was named a Director of the Year for 2014 by the Corporate Directors Forum for his work
at Ligand Pharmaceuticals (LGND), has been an American Cancer Society Faculty Research Awardee, a
recipient of the Pfizer Award in Enzyme Chemistry from the American Chemical Society (ACS), the
Distinguished Scientist Award of the San Diego Section of the ACS and is a Fellow of the AAAS. Dr.
Kozarich currently serves on the Boards of Ligand, Nucorion and Curza (Salt Lake City, UT). He holds a
B.S. in chemistry from Boston College, a Ph.D. in biological chemistry from the Massachusetts Institute
of Technology and was an NIH Postdoctoral Fellow at Harvard University.
4.1.1.2 Conflicts of interest at the level of the administrative bodies and executive management
In accordance with the internal rules of the Board of Directors, each of the Directors has undertaken
to act in all circumstances with loyalty and in the corporate interest of the Company. Before accepting
their duties, Directors have to review the provisions of the laws or regulations related to their duties,
stock market violations as well as the Company’s bylaws and articles of incorporation, and the other
rules for the internal functioning of the Board of Directors. Each Director has signed a copy of the
internal rules of the Board of Directors.
Each Director must inform the Board of Directors, as soon as he becomes aware of any conflict of
interest situation, even if only potential, and must refrain from participating in the debates and in the
vote on the corresponding deliberation. The Directors must present their resignation in the event of a
permanent conflict of interest. The Board of Directors reviews, at least once a year, the identified
conflicts of interest, based on the work of the Nominating & Corporate Social Responsibility
Committee. The Chairman of the Board, the Board of Directors and the CEO are not required to
communicate to the members of the Board who are, or think are in a conflict of interest, information
or documents pertaining to the agreement, transaction or situation causing the conflict of interest.
They may inform the Board in such situations.
Page 293
The Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and all Directors are direct or indirect shareholders of the
Company and/or holders of securities giving access to the Company's share capital (see Sections 4.2.5
Warrants, Founder Warrants, Stock Options and Performance Shares granted to the corporate
officers” and Section 4.3 “Shareholding and Stock Performance” of this Universal Registration
Document ).
There are related-party agreements, as described in Sections 4.4.2 “Significant agreements concluded
with related parties” and 4.4.4 “Special report of the Statutory Auditors on related-party agreements
and commitments” of this Universal Registration Document.
To the best of the Company's knowledge and subject to personal interests related to the agreements
presented in Section 4.1.2.2 “Service contracts between the directors and the Company” of this
Universal Registration Document , there is no existing or potential conflict of interest between the
duties in respect of the Company and the private interests and/or other duties of the members of the
administration and management bodies and the executive management as referred to in Section 4.1.1
General information on founders, management and directors” of this Universal Registration
Document.
To the best of the Company's knowledge, there is no other arrangement or agreement entered into
with shareholders, customers, suppliers or others pursuant to which one of the Directors or one of the
Executives of the Company has been appointed, or providing for a restriction applicable to the persons
referred to in Section 4.1.1 “General information on founders, management and directors” of this
Universal Registration Document concerning any disposal of their interests in the Company’s share
capital.
4.1.2 Operation of the administrative and management bodies
4.1.2.1 The Company is a French société anonyme à Conseil d’administration (public limited
company with a Board of Directors)
By resolution dated June 23, 2010, the Board of Directors decided to separate the duties of Chairman
from those of CEO. Pierre Legault has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors since March 31,
2016. Thomas Kuhn represents the Company vis-a-vis third parties in his capacity as Chief Executive
Officer.
The detailed composition of the Board of Directors and the expiry dates of the terms of office of the
members of the Board of Directors are set out in Section 4.1.1.1.1 “Composition of the Board of
Directors and Committees” of this Universal Registration Document.
During the 2021 financial year, the Board of Directors of the Company met 7 times. The average of the
Directors’ attendance rate is 95,3%.
4.1.2.2 Service contracts between the directors and the Company
The Company is linked to some of its Directors and Officers pursuant to the agreements described in
Section 4.4.2 “Significant agreements concluded with related parties”.
4.1.2.3 Specialized Committees
The Board of Directors has set up six permanent specialized committees (Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee, Scientific Advisory Committee, Nominating & Corporate Social
Responsibility Committee, Business Development Committee, and Strategic Committee) to assist the
Board of Directors in its work. The role and operating procedures of its Committees are set out in the
internal regulations adopted March 12, 2014, as amended on June 30, 2017 and September 23, 2021
as well as for the Audit Committee in the audit committee charter adopted June 30, 2017, as amended
on March 26, 2020 and September 23,2021. The Committee members shall receive no compensation
other than directors’ remuneration.
Page 294
4.1.2.3.1 Audit Committee
Objectives – Allocations
The Audit Committee monitors issues relating to the preparation and the oversight of accounting and
financial information and is responsible for making recommendations to the Board of Directors in its
permanent assignment of oversight of the management of the Company as required by law and the
bylaws of the Company.
Without prejudice to the powers of the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee is specifically
responsible for:
-
the development process for financial information and where appropriate, formulating
recommendations to guarantee this in its entirety;
-
-
-
the effectiveness of the internal control and risk management systems;
the Company's compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;
the statutory audit of the annual and consolidated financial statements by the Statutory
Auditors;
-
the Statutory Auditors qualifications and independence, and all the means to secure Statutory
Auditors independence;
-
the process for selecting the Statutory Auditors;
The Audit Committee is also responsible for approving:
-
non-audit services provided by the Statutory Auditors and the level of fees allowed for non-
audit services provided by the Statutory Auditors;
-
all budgets for statutory audits and other engagements provided by the Statutory Auditors.
The Audit Committee monitors the services provided by the Statutory Auditors in relation to what is
permitted by law or regulation.
The Audit Committee is responsible for formulating recommendations on the statutory auditors
proposed for nomination by the General Meeting of Shareholders and/or during the renewal of their
term and to approve provision of the services referred to in Article L. 822-11-2 of the French
Commercial Code. The Chairman of the Audit Committee ensures that the reports of the activities of
the Audit Committee to the Board of Directors will permit it to be fully informed, thus facilitating its
deliberations.
If, in the course of its work, the Audit Committee detects a significant risk that did not appear to be
adequately addressed, the Chairman of the Audit Committee promptly alerts the Chairman of the
Board of Directors.
The role of the Audit Committee is less one of going into the details of the accounts and more about
monitoring the processes for their preparation and assessing the validity of the methods chosen for
processing significant transactions.
In this context, the Audit Committee may examine the Company’s annual financial statements as they
are presented to the Board of Directors, hear the opinions of the Statutory Auditors and the Chief
Financial Officer and receive information in relation to their analysis work and their conclusions.
Within the scope of their assignments, Committee members have the same rights to information as
Directors.
The Audit Committee may use external experts at the expense of the Company, after having informed
the Chairman of the Board of Directors or the Audit Committee and must report on the work by the
experts to the Board of Directors.
Page 295
Composition – Compensation
The Committee is composed of at least three directors of the Board. Committee members are
appointed by the Board of Directors from among the members of the Board, excluding executive
directors. They are appointed for a fixed period of time, which may not exceed the length of their
terms of office as directors and they may be removed by the Board of Directors at any time and without
reason. Their appointments are renewable without limitation. On the date of this Universal
Registration Document the Audit Committee is comprised of four members three of which are
independent directors including the Committee Chairman.
The Committee may invite any person, internal or external to the Company, to take part in its meetings
and its work.
Committee members must be competent in financial or accounting matters and at least the
chairperson must be independent in accordance with the provisions of the MiddleNext Code.
The Committee Chairman is appointed by the Board of Directors.
The duties of the Committee members within the Committee may be taken into consideration in
determining the allocation of their remuneration.
Operating procedures
The Committee meets when the Chairman of the Committee of the Board of Directors considers it
useful and at least twice per year, particularly before publication of the financial statements. The
Committee may be convened by any means at least 24 hours before the meeting by the Committee
Chairman or of the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer or any individual to
whom one of them shall have delegated the necessary authority.
The Committee meets at the registered office or in any other place mentioned in the meeting notice.
It may also meet by video conference or by any means of telecommunication as specified in the
internal regulation of the Board of Directors.
Meetings are chaired by the Committee Chairman and, if he/she is absent, by another member
designated by the Committee to chair the meeting.
The presence of at least two-thirds of the Committee members in office is necessary for the validity of
the deliberations.
A Committee member may be represented by another Committee member.
The Committee’s recommendations are adopted by a simple majority and, in the event of a tie in the
voting, the Committee Chairman has the deciding vote.
At the end of each meeting, if the members deem it necessary, the minutes of the meeting may be
prepared. Minutes are signed by the Chairman of the session and at least one Committee member.
The Committee Chairman reports regularly to the Board of Directors on the Committee’s work and
shall immediately report any difficulty encountered.
The Audit Committee has met six times during the 2021 financial year and reported regularly to the
Board of Directors, providing recommendations whenever required. The Audit Committee has notably:
-
reviewed non-audit services provided by the Statutory Auditors and the level of fees allowed
for non-audit services provided by the Statutory Auditors;
-
monitored a request for proposal and provided the Board of Directors with a recommendation
in connection with the appointment of a new statutory auditor: Becouze, acknowledging that
the mandate of a Deputy Statutory Auditor of the Company, Mr. Emmanuel Charnavel, was
expiring on the date of General Meeting of Shareholders convened to approve the financial
Page 296
statements for the financial year ended December 31, 2020, conducted (see Section 4.5.1.3
Information on auditors who have resigned, have been removed or have not been renewed”);
met with the Statutory Auditors (including for the review of the year-end and half-year
financial statements) and discussed their audit plan, fees, as well as the materiality thresholds
used in the context of the statutory audit of the Company’s annual and consolidated financial
statements;
reviewed the Statutory Auditors reports and discussed the key audit findings with the
Statutory Auditors acknowledging that no material finding was reported;
reviewed the internal control procedure of the Company and ensured the integrity of the
financial reporting;
-
-
-
-
reviewed the financial communication proposed by the management.
4.1.2.3.2 Compensation Committee
Objectives – Allocations
The Committee’s role is to make recommendations to the Board of Directors in relation to the
appointment and compensation of the executive directors and the operational and functional
managers and with regard to appointments and compensation policy and internal profit sharing. In
particular, the Compensation Committee:
-
makes recommendations and proposals to the Board of Directors concerning the
appointment, compensation, retirement and provident scheme, supplementary pension
benefits, benefits in kind, various financial rights of the Company's managers and executive
officers, the allocation of performance shares, share subscription warrants, share
subscription or share purchase options, for the benefit of employees, managers, consultants
or other employees of the Company and, where applicable, its subsidiaries, in accordance
with legal provisions;
-
-
defines the methods for determining the variable portion of the compensation of corporate
officers and monitors its application;
proposes a general policy for awarding bonus or performance shares, and options to
subscribe or purchase shares, and determines the frequency thereof, depending on the
categories of beneficiaries;
-
-
examines the system of allocating compensation among the members of the Board of
Directors, particularly according to their participation in the Company Committees;
expresses its opinion to senior management about the compensation of the principal senior
executives.
Within the scope of their assignments, Committee members have the same rights to information as
Directors.
Composition – Compensation
The Committee is composed of at least two members. Committee members are appointed by the
Board of Directors from among the members of the Board of Directors or third parties. They are
appointed for a fixed period of time, which may not exceed, as applicable, the length of their terms of
office as directors and they may be removed by the Board of Directors at any time and without reason.
Their appointments are renewable without limitation. Executive directors may also be appointed;
however, individual executive directors may not take part in deliberations concerning themselves. On
the date of this Universal Registration Document the Compensation Committee is comprised of three
members two of which are independent directors including the Committee Chairman.
Page 297
The Committee may invite any person, internal or external to the Company, to take part in its meetings
and its work.
The Committee Chairman is appointed by the Board of Directors.
The duties of Committee members within the Committee may be taken into consideration in
determining the allocation of their remuneration.
Operating procedures
-
The Committee meets when the Committee Chairman or the Chairman of the Board of
Directors considers it useful and at least twice per year, particularly before publication of the
financial statements. The Committee may be convened by any means at least 24 hours before
the meeting by the Committee Chairman or the Chairman of the Board of Directors or any
individual to whom one of them shall have delegated the necessary authority.
The Committee meets at the registered office or in any other place mentioned in the
meeting notice. It may also meet by video conference or by any means of
telecommunication as specified in the internal regulation of the Board of Directors.
Meetings are chaired by the Committee Chairman and, if he/she is absent, by another
member designated by the Committee to chair the meeting.
-
-
-
-
A Committee member may be represented by another Committee member.
The Committee’s recommendations are adopted by a simple majority and, in the event of
a tie in the voting, the Committee Chairman has the deciding vote.
-
At the end of each meeting, if the members deem it necessary, the minutes of the meeting
may be prepared. Minutes are signed by the Chairman of the session and at least one
Committee member.
-
-
The Committee Chairman reports regularly to the Board of Directors on the Committee’s
work and shall immediately report any difficulty encountered.
The Compensation Committee has met six times during the 2021 financial year and
reported regularly to the Board of Directors, providing recommendations whenever
required. The Compensation Committee has notably:
-
-
reviewed the recruitment plan and progress on recruitment during the 2021 financial year;
reviewed the achievement of the 2020 corporate objectives and made recommendations
for the allocation of variable compensation to the Company's managers and executive
officers;
-
-
-
-
made a recommendation on the Company’s corporate objectives for 2021 as well as on the
objectives for the variable compensation of the Company's managers and executive
officers;
reviewed and made recommendations on the achievement of the performance conditions
to be assessed by the Board of Directors for the acquisition of certain performance shares
in the financial year 2021;
made a recommendation on the number of long-term incentives to be granted in the
financial year 2021 as well as on the performance conditions associated to such incentives,
if any;
reviewed and made recommendations on the compensation of the members of the Board
of Directors and potential new candidates for appointment as directors, particularly in
connection to their participation in the Company Committees.
4.1.2.3.3 Business Development Committee
Objectives – Allocations
The Business Development Committee prepares recommendations for the Board of Directors
regarding customer development, in particular:
Page 298
-
to make recommendations and proposals to the Board of Directors concerning the main lines
of Business Development;
-
-
to assist the Chief Executive Officer in implementing this policy;
to analyze the competitive environment, target markets and development opportunities,
both in France and abroad;
-
to analyze the Company’s operations and prepares recommendations for their optimization.
Within the scope of their assignments, Committee members have the same rights to information as
Directors.
Composition – Compensation
The Committee is composed of at least two members. Committee members are appointed by the
Board of Directors from among the members of the Board of Directors or third parties. They are
appointed for a fixed period of time, which may not exceed, as applicable, the length of their terms of
office as directors and they may be removed by the Board of Directors at any time and without reason.
Their appointments are renewable without limitation. Executive directors may also be appointed.
The Committee may invite any person, internal or external to the Company, to take part in its meetings
and its work.
The Committee Chairman is appointed by the Board of Directors.
The duties of the Committee members within the Committee may be taken into consideration in
determining the allocation of their remuneration.
Operating procedures
-
The Committee meets when the Chairman of the Committee or of the Board of Directors
considers it useful and at least four times per year. The Committee may be convened by any
means at least 24 hours before the meeting by the Committee Chairman or the Chairman of
the Board of Directors or any individual to whom one of them shall have delegated the
necessary authority.
-
-
The Committee meets at the registered office or in any other place mentioned in the
meeting notice. It may also meet by video conference or by any means of
telecommunication as specified in the internal regulation of the Board of Directors.
Meetings are chaired by the Committee Chairman and, if he/she is absent, by another
member designated by the Committee to chair the meeting.
-
-
A Committee member may be represented by another Committee member.
The Committee’s recommendations are adopted by a simple majority and, in the event of
a tie in the voting, the Committee Chairman has the deciding vote.
-
At the end of each meeting, if the members deem it necessary, the minutes of the meeting
may be prepared. Minutes are signed by the Chairman of the session and at least one
Committee member.
-
-
The Committee Chairman reports regularly to the Board of Directors on the Committee’s
work and shall immediately report any difficulty encountered.
The Business Development Committee has met six times during the 2021 financial year and
reported regularly to the Board of Directors, providing recommendations whenever
required. The Business Development Committee has notably:
-
-
monitored the relationship and the progress made with the Company’s partner for the
development and approval of Imeglimin in Japan;
discussed the new strategic direction of the Company with increasing focus on rare
metabolic diseases, reviewed partnership opportunities for the Company’s other programs;
discussed competitive environment, target markets and development opportunities;
reviewed potential external opportunities.
-
-
Page 299
4.1.2.3.4 Scientific Advisory Committee
Objectives – Allocations
The objective of the Scientific Advisory Committee is to prepare strategic advice and recommendations
for the Board of Directors regarding research and development programs, in particular:
-
to make recommendations and proposals to the Board of Directors with regard to current
and future R&D projects;
-
-
to advise the Board of Directors on the scientific merits of these programs;
to provide general strategic advice on scientific and technological developments.
Within the scope of their assignments, Committee members have the same rights to information as
those of Directors.
Composition – Compensation
The Committee is composed of at least two members. Committee members are appointed by the
Board of Directors from among the members of the Board of Directors or third parties. They are
appointed for a fixed period of time, which may not exceed, as applicable, the length of their terms of
office as directors, and they may be removed by the Board of Directors at any time and without reason.
Their appointments are renewable without limitation. Executive directors may also be appointed.
The Committee may invite any person, internal or external to the Company, to take part in its meetings
and its work.
The Committee Chairman is appointed by the Board of Directors.
The duties of the Committee members within the Committee may be taken into consideration in
determining the allocation of their remuneration.
Operating procedures
The Committee meets when the Committee Chairman or the Chairman of the Board of Directors
considers it useful and at least four times per year. The Committee may be convened by any means at
least 24 hours before the meeting by the Committee Chairman or the Chairman of the Board of
Directors or any individual to whom one of them shall have delegated the necessary authority.
The Committee meets at the registered office or in any other place mentioned in the meeting notice.
It may also meet by video conference or by any means of telecommunication as specified in the
internal regulation of the Board of Directors.
Meetings are chaired by the Committee Chairman and, if he/she is absent, by another member
designated by the Committee to chair the meeting.
A Committee member may be represented by another Committee member.
The Committee’s recommendations are adopted by a simple majority and, in the event of a tie in the
voting, the Committee Chairman has the deciding vote.
At the end of each meeting, if the members deem it necessary, the minutes of the meeting may be
prepared. Minutes are signed by the Chairman of the session and at least one Committee member.
The Committee Chairman reports regularly to the Board of Directors on the Committee’s work and
shall immediately report any difficulty encountered.
The Scientific Advisory Committee has met five times during the 2021 financial year and reported
regularly to the Board of Directors, providing recommendations whenever required. The Scientific
Advisory Committee has notably:
-
reviewed the results of the clinical studies related to PXL770;
Page 300
-
-
-
followed the development plan related to the enrollment in Phase 2 NASH trial for PXL065
in Biopsy-proven patients;
monitored the progress made with the Company’s partners for the development of
Imeglimin;
discussed potential internal and external opportunities for the expansion of the Company’s
portfolio, in the rare metabolic diseases field.
4.1.2.3.5 Nominating & Corporate Social Responsibility Committee
Objectives – Allocations
The objective of the Nominating & Corporate Social Responsibility Committee is to assist the Board of
Directors on all governance matters and to assist it in the process of appointing new members, and in
particular to:
With respect to appointments:
-
-
periodically review the diversity of the composition of, especially, the Board of Directors, the
organization and functioning of the Board of Directors and its Committees, to formulate
recommendations and proposals;
identify and review candidates for appointment as directors or corporate officers or members
of a Board Committee;
-
-
make recommendations to ensure the succession of the Company's officers and key persons;
make recommendations on all matters relating to the rights and obligations of directors, and
in particular in light of conflicts of interest;
-
-
ensure the training of directors and the integration of new directors;
discuss the qualification of each director as an independent director at the time of his or her
appointment and, if applicable, during the exercise of his or her term;
review the Company's non-financial risk factors;
review and make recommendations on the Board's performance (annual evaluation, self-
evaluation);
-
-
-
periodically review the Articles of Association of the Company, the Internal Regulation of the
Board of Directors, as well as other internal operating rules of the Board of Directors or the
Company (code of conduct, internal regulation of the Company, etc.).
With respect to CSR:
-
-
-
review the Company's CSR strategy, monitors its results annually and makes recommendations
to the Board of Directors;
examine the main opportunities and risks for the Group and for all stakeholders with regard
to issues specific to its mission and activities;
to be informed of and, where appropriate, participate in the definition of the Company's
general CSR policy and approve its scope of action;
-
-
oversee the implementation and progressive deployment of this policy and these actions;
inform the Board of Directors about the long-term development, including economic
development, of the Company through its CSR actions;
assess risks and identifies new opportunities, taking into account the impact of the Company's CSR
policy in terms of economic performance, and evaluating the impact for society.Within the scope of
their assignments, Committee members have the same rights to information as Directors.
Composition – Compensation
The Committee is composed of at least two members. Committee members are appointed by the
Board of Directors from among the members of the Board of Directors or third parties. They are
appointed for a fixed period of time, which may not exceed, as applicable, the length of their terms of
Page 301
office as directors and they may be removed by the Board of Directors at any time and without reason.
Their appointments are renewable without limitation. Executive directors may also be appointed.
The Committee may invite any person, internal or external to the Company, to take part in its meetings
and its work.
The Committee Chairman is appointed by the Board of Directors.
The duties of the Committee members within the Committee may be taken into consideration in
determining the allocation of their remuneration.
Operating procedures
The Committee meets when the Committee Chairman or the Chairman of the Board of Directors
considers it useful and at least four times per year. The Committee may be convened by any means at
least 24 hours before the meeting by the Committee Chairman or the Chairman of the Board of
Directors or any individual to whom one of them shall have delegated the necessary authority.
The Committee meets at the registered office or in any other place mentioned in the meeting notice.
It may also meet by video conference or by any means of telecommunication as specified in the
internal regulation of the Board of Directors.
Meetings are chaired by the Committee Chairman and, if he/she is absent, by another member
designated by the Committee to chair the meeting.
A Committee member may be represented by another Committee member.
The Committee’s recommendations are adopted by a simple majority and, in the event of a tie in the
voting, the Committee Chairman has the deciding vote.
At the end of each meeting, if the members deem it necessary, the minutes of the meeting may be
prepared. Minutes are signed by the Chairman of the session and at least one Committee member.
The Committee Chairman reports regularly to the Board of Directors on the Committee’s work and
shall immediately report any difficulty encountered.
The Nominating & Corporate Social Responsibility Committee has met five times during the 2021
financial year and reported regularly to the Board of Directors, providing recommendations whenever
required. The Nominating & Corporate Social Responsibility Committee has notably:
-
-
-
reviewed the composition of the Board of Directors and its committees and discussed the
renewal of certain Director’s terms of office;
conducted interviews to identify and review candidates for potential appointment as
members of the Board of Directors;
implemented and monitored a self-evaluation of the Board of Directors and made
recommendations thereafter to improve the organization and functioning of the Board of
Directors and its Committees;
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
reviewed the recommendations and vigilance points of the MiddleNext Code;
reviewed and updated certain of the Company’s corporate policies;
worked on the succession plan for the executive officers of the Company;
regularly reviewed potential conflicts of interest of the Directors;
reviewed the CSR strategy of the Company;
approved a global action plan in connection with the CSR;
monitored the implementation of the CSR action plan.
Page 302
4.1.2.3.6 Strategic Committee
The permanent Strategic Committee was created starting January 1, 2021 by a decision by the Board
of Directors on October 1st, 2020.
This committee meets regularly and on an ad hoc basis as the case may be, to assist the Board of
Directors in its work on strategic discussions. The Strategic Committee has met five times during the
2021 financial year and reported regularly to the Board of Directors, providing recommendations
whenever required.
4.1.2.4 Observers
In accordance with the Company’s bylaws, the Company may have a panel of observers composed of
a maximum of five (5) observers, who may be appointed upon a decision by an Ordinary General
Meeting of Shareholders or a decision by the Board of Directors, for a term of three (3) years. Their
term of appointment ends at the end of the ordinary general meeting of shareholders called to
approve the financial statements for the previous financial year and held during the year in which the
term expires.
They are dismissed by decision of the Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders or of the Board of
Directors.
Observers are called to attend all meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors in the same way as
directors. They have the same right to information as the directors.
They take part in meetings of the Board of Directors of the Company in an advisory capacity, and do
not have any voting rights.
On the date of this Universal Registration Document, the Company has no observers.
4.1.2.5 Statement related to corporate governance
The Company refers to the MiddleNext Code of Corporate Governance as updated in September 2016
and September 2021 and approved as a reference code by the AMF, in as much as the principles
contained in the Code are compatible with the Company’s organization, size, resources and
shareholder structure, particularly in relation to the drafting of the corporate governance report,
provided for by Article L. 225-37 of the French commercial code.
The Board of Directors consists of eight members, including the Chief Executive Officer. The
composition of the Board of Directors is set out in Section 4.1.1.1.1 “Composition of the Board of
Directors and the Committees” of the Universal Registration Document.
The Company currently has six independent directors, as defined by the MiddleNext Code of
Corporate Governance, namely Khoso Baluch, Richard Kender, Pascale Boissel, Janice Bourque,
John W. Kozarich and Kumi Sato. These directors are considered independent because they:
are not employed by nor are executive directors of the Company, nor have they held such a
position in the past five years;
do not have and have not had, over the last two years, significant business relationships with
the Company (customers, suppliers, competitors, providers, creditors, bankers, etc.);
are not reference shareholders of the Company or do not hold a significant percentage of
voting rights;
do not have close ties or family connections with any executive director or reference
shareholder;
have not been auditors of the Company for the last six years.
The table below shows the situation of independent directors in the light of the criteria of
independence retained by the Company, in accordance with the MiddleNext Code of corporate
governance:
Page 303
Explanations in
case of non-
compliance
M. Khoso
Baluch
Independence criteria
R. Kender
P. Boissel J.Bourque
K. Sato
J.W.Kozarich
Not be, or have been
within the last 5 years, an
employee or executive
officer of the Company
Not have been in the last 2
years and not be in a
significant business
relationship with the
Company (clients, service
providers, creditors,
bankers, etc.)
Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant
Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant
Compliant
Compliant
Compliant
Not be a reference
shareholder of the
Company or hold a
Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant
significant percentage of
voting rights
Not having any close
family or close ties with a
corporate officer or a
reference shareholder
Not having been an
auditor of the Company in
the last 6 years
Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant
Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant Compliant
Compliant
Compliant
The independent directors were awarded share subscription warrants for (i) a subscription price in
order to reflect the fair market value of the right represented by these stock warrants based on, where
applicable, work carried out by an independent expert, and (ii) an exercise price based on the price of
Company shares at the time of the decision of the Board of Directors to issue stock warrants in order
to reflect the actual value of the share (See Section 4.2.5 “Warrants, Founder Warrants, Stock Options
and Performance Shares granted to the corporate officers” and Section 4.2.5 “Warrants, Founder
Warrants, Stock Options and Performance Shares granted to the corporate officers”). Taking into
account these elements and the amounts involved which are not significant for the Directors, the
Company Board of Directors has found that the allocations of stock warrants to these directors did not
undermine their independence.
The internal regulation of the Board of Directors, as well as the specialized Committees it describes,
supplement the legal and regulatory provisions, in compliance with the French Commercial Code and
the MiddleNext Code of Corporate Governance.
The Company has six specialized Committees set up by the Board of Directors: the Audit Committee,
the Compensation Committee, the Business Development Committee, the Scientific Advisory
Committee, the Nominating & Corporate Social Responsibility Committee and the Strategic
Committee, presented in Section 4.1.2.3 “Specialized Committees” of this Universal Registration
Document .
The following table summarizes the Company’s position on each of the recommendations set out in
the MiddleNext Corporate Governance Code:
Page 304
Will be
adopted if
applicable
Not
adopted
Recommendation of the MiddleNext Code
Oversight authority
Adopted
R1 - Ethics of board members
R2 - Conflicts of interest
X
X
R3 - Composition of the board - Presence of independent
members
X
R4 - Information of the board members
R5 - Training of the board members (Note 1)
R6 - Organization of the meetings of the board and
committees
X
X
X
X
R7 - Establishment of committees
R8 - Establishment of a specialized committee
on Corporate Social Responsibility
and environmental responsibility (CSR)
R9 - Establishment of a board internal regulation
R10 - Choice of each board member
R11 - Duration of the terms of office of board members
R12 - Compensation of board members
R13 - Establishment of an assessment of the board’s work
(Note 2)
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
R14 - Relations with “shareholders”
Executive authority
X
R15 - Diversity and equality policy
R16 - Definition and transparency of the compensation
of the company executives
X
X
R17 - Preparation of the succession of the “executives”
R18 - Accumulation of work contract and company mandate
(Note 3)
X
X
R19 - Employee severance benefits (Note 4)
R20 - Supplementary retirement plans (Note 5)
R21 - Stock options and allocation of performance shares
R22 - Review of the points for monitoring (Note 6)
X
X
X
Note 1: On March 22, 2021, the Board of Directors, upon recommendation of the Nominating and
Corporate Social Responsibility Committee decided to implement a 3-year training plan for Directors
which will include sessions dedicated to the scientific aspects of the Company’s pipeline, competitive
landscape, applicable regulations, ethics and governance and corporate social responsibility. Each
Director will attend at least 4 days of training over this 3-year period.
Note 2: The Board of Directors performs a self-assessment of its working methods and operation on
an annual basis in accordance with its internal regulation. The 2021 results were discussed by the Board
and resulted in an action plan.
Note 3: No executive director of the Company currently has an employment contract. If such a situation
were to be put in place, Recommendation 18 would be followed.
Note 4: Mr. Thomas Kuhn is owed compensation during his term of office related to forced departure
without cause. (see Section 4.2.1.1 “General principles and structure of the total compensation of the
executive officers”).
Page 305
Note 5: Even though no supplementary retirement plan is currently in place, Recommendation 20 to
ensure greater transparency for shareholders would be followed where applicable, if the Company
were to adopt such plans.
Note 6: The Company Board of Directors reviews the MiddleNext points for monitoring on an annual
basis.
4.1.2.6 Statement related to diversity and equality
See Section 2.5 “CSR Report” related to diversity and equality.
4.1.2.7 Statement related to the General Meeting of Shareholders
The Company held its annual General Meeting of Shareholders on June 23, 2021. 48.32% of the
Company voting rights were present or represented. All resolutions submitted to the General Meeting
of Shareholders and recommended for approval by the Company’s Board of Directors were passed
with more than 94% votes in favor.
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document , no shareholder individually holds either control
of the Company, or a percentage likely to lead to the presumption of control of the Company within
the meaning of the provisions of Article L. 233-3 of the French Commercial Code. Section 4.3 “Share
capital and voting right distribution” describes the ownership structure and the identity of
shareholders directly or indirectly holding more than 5% of the share capital or voting rights at general
meetings as of the date of this Universal Registration Document.
The Company Board of Directors has specifically reviewed the votes of the shareholders referred to as
“Public” in Section 4.3 “Share capital and voting right distribution”, during its June 23, 2021 General
Meeting of Shareholders. These shareholders present or represented at the General Meeting of
Shareholders represented 5,27% of the total Company voting rights (and 10,94% of the Company
voting rights that were present or represented at the General Meeting of Shareholders). The Company
Board of Directors noted that a majority of shareholders referred to as “Public” in Section 4.3 “Share
capital and voting right distribution” voted in favor of all resolutions submitted to the General Meeting
of Shareholders which were recommended by the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors is
committed to maintaining an ongoing dialog with such shareholders.
4.1.2.8 Internal controls
The Company uses the internal audit system definition set out by the AMF, according to which the
internal control procedure is a system that the Company defines and implements under its own
responsibility. This system aims to ensure:
compliance with laws and regulations;
application of the instructions and guidelines set by Senior Management;
proper functioning of the Company’s internal processes;
reliability of financial information; and,
more generally, it helps manage the Company’s activities, control the efficiency of its
operations and oversee the efficient use of its resources.
The Company maintains an internal control process designed to “internally guarantee the relevance
and reliability of the information used and disseminated in the Company’s activities.” Since October
2020, the key finance processes are handled under Netsuite, a SOC 1 certified accounting system. This
implementation reinforces the will of the company to enhance internal control through automation,
ITGCs and segregation of duties.
However, internal control cannot provide an absolute assurance that the Company’s objectives will be
achieved, or that the risk of error or fraud will be totally controlled or eliminated.
Page 306
Components of internal control
The internal control system relies on clear coordination of responsibilities, benchmarks, resources, and
processes. Since its creation, the Company has been in the process of developing a quality assurance
system, to compile existing documents and audits, ensure their updating and consistency, and
consolidate them when necessary. The processes governing all of the Company’s businesses are
described in procedures, operating methods, notices and forms. These documents also chart business
flows, designate the resources and responsibilities of participants and specify the Company’s expertise,
while also giving instructions for particular operations.
All of the Company’s stakeholders are involved in internal control.
Procedures related to the operating processes
All documents governing quality management are saved on a dedicated intranet allowing for optimized
access, as well as continuous changes in business activity (Document Life Cycle Management). The goal
is continuous quality improvement in the operating, management and support processes of the
Company and the Group.
The quality assurance system covers the following fields:
quality assurance, health and safety, risk management;
administrative, legal, social and social and financial fields, including internal controls.
pharmaceutical, pre-clinical and clinical research and development.
Organization of the accounting and financial department
The financial function is internally managed by the Chief Financial Officer. The accounting function is
performed with the assistance of a certified accountant. The Company is committed to maintaining a
separation between its activities of production and supervision of the financial statements and hires
independent experts for the valuation of complex accounting items (retirement obligations, valuation
of share warrants/founder warrants) and/or requiring subjective assumptions.
Payroll and tax compliance are carried out by a certified accountant.
The financial statements, prepared in accordance with French standards and IFRS with the assistance
of an accounting firm, are subject to an audit by the Company’s co-statutory auditors.
The Finance Department reports directly to the Chief Executive Officer.
Budget process and “monthly reporting”
The accounting system implemented by the Company is based on IFRS accounting standards. An
annual budget is drawn up by the Company. The Company also draws up a “monthly report,” which
includes an operating account, balance sheet and cash flow forecasts. These components are
presented to the Executive Committee and to the Board of Directors as needed. The Company
monitors the budget precisely and on a timely manner.
Delegation of authority
A delegation of authority has been granted to each executive responsible for an activity in order to
develop and negotiate purchases of goods or services. The effective order is nevertheless signed by
Senior Management (or the Chief Financial Officer, on instructions from Senior Management).
Purchase or service requests or pre-clinical or clinical study contracts (which are treated as purchase
requests because they are specific to each study) are the subject of requests for expenditure
commitments validated by Management Control and Senior Management. Invoices are then
reconciled with these commitment requests and delivery notes for the services, before accounting,
approval and payment - these three activities being carried out by different individuals in accordance
with the principles of separation of duties.
Page 307
Most payments are transfers validated by an electronic signature. This system ensures systematic
archiving of the transactions and allows for the tracking of the signatories, the bank contact details of
the suppliers and a comprehensive ex-post audit if needed.
Page 308
4.2
Compensation
This section includes a complete description of the components of the compensation for the corporate
officers of the Company. The 2022 General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company is invited to
decide upon the following components:
-
with regard to the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and the Directors of the
Company of the Company: the compensation policy for the corporate officers pursuant to article
L. 22-10-8 of the French Commercial Code, which is presented at Section 4.2.9 of this Universal
Registration Document and which is the subject of the resolutions proposed to the General
Meeting;
-
with regard to the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer and the Directors of the
Company: the elements which make up the total remuneration and the benefits of all kinds paid
during 2021 or awarded in respect of 2021 pursuant to article L. 22-10-9 of the French Commercial
Code. These elements are described at Sections 4.2.2 to 4.2.8 of this Universal Registration
Document and are the subject of the resolutions proposed to the General Meeting, pursuant to
article L. 22-10-34 of the French Commercial Code;
The information is prepared by reference to the corporate governance code as published on December
2009 by MiddleNext, updated in September 2016 and September 2021 and validated as a reference
code by the AMF.
The tables provided for in “AMF Position–Recommendation DOC 2021-02” of January 5, 2022 are
presented below.
4.2.1 Compensation policy applicable to corporate officers
This section sets out the compensation policy for the corporate officers of the Company which will be
submitted to the 2022 General Meeting of Shareholders, pursuant to article L. 22-10-8 of the French
Commercial Code.
Upon the proposal of the Compensation Committee and in accordance with the rules set out in the
MiddleNext Code, the Board of Directors has determined a compensation policy which is consistent
with the Company’s corporate interest, contributes to its sustainability and is in line with its strategy.
Considering that the proposed compensations policies for the corporate officers of the Company have
been approved at more than 89% by the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 23, 2021 pursuant
to article L. 22-10-8 of the French Commercial Code, the Board of Directors of the Company decided
not to amend the principles and structure for the compensation of the executive officers for the next
fiscal year.
4.2.1.1 General principles and structure of the total compensation of the executive officers
The general principles of the compensation policy of the executive officers are decided by the Board
of Directors upon the proposal of the Compensation Committee.
The compensation policy takes into account the following principles in accordance with the rules set
out in the MiddleNext Code to which the Company has adhered:
Comprehensiveness of the compensation presented: all compensation components are taken
into account in the overall assessment of the compensation; they are clearly substantiated,
The principle of balance and consistency: the Compensation Committee ensures the balance
and consistency of the compensation to ensure it is in the company’s general interest,
Understandability of the rules: the rules must be simple and transparent; the performance
criteria used to establish the variable part of the compensation, or where applicable, for the
Page 309
grant of stock options or performance shares must be in relation with the company’s
performance, correspond to its objectives, be exacting, explicable and, as far as possible, of a
long-term nature,
Proportionality: the determination of the compensation must ensure a fair balance and take
into account both the company’s general interest, market practices and the management
performance,
Transparency: provision of annual information to the shareholders on the entire amount of
compensation and benefits received by the management is carried out transparently in
accordance with the applicable regulations,
The Board of Directors and the Compensation Committee comply with the principle of
comparability (benchmark). Compensation is assessed in the context of the reference market
within the limit of the specificities of the roles, the responsibility assumed, the results obtained
and the work carried out by the executive officers.
As of December 31, 2021, the executive officers are:
-
-
Mr. Pierre Legault, Chairman of the Board of Directors; and
Mr. Thomas Kuhn, Chief Executive Officer.
The structure of the compensation of the executive officers is reviewed every year by the Board of
Directors, which sets the various components of said compensation, based on the Compensation
Committee’s recommendations.
Fixed compensation
The Chairman of the Board of Directors, and the Chief Executive Officer, receive fixed compensation
The fixed annual compensation of the executive officers is determined by the Board of Directors based
on the Compensation Committee’s recommendations.
In the event of the appointment of a new Chairman, a new Chief Executive Officer, a deputy chief
executive officer or several of the above, the principles set out above would be applicable for the
determination of their compensation policy, it being specified that the amount could be adapted
depending on the profile, experience or the level of responsibility of the new executive officer.
Variable compensation
Variable compensation is aimed at associating the executive officers with the Company’s short-term
performance. Only the Chief Executive Officer can be granted variable compensation. The Chairman
of the Board of Directors is not allocated any variable compensation.
Moreover, the rules for setting this compensation are consistent with the Company’s strategy. The
terms and conditions of the annual variable compensation are understandable for the shareholder and
are the subject each year of clear, exhaustive information provided in the annual report.
The indicators taken into account in determining variable compensation and the level of the objectives
to be met are set every year by the Board of Directors based on the recommendation of the
Compensation Committee at the beginning of the reference period to which they apply.
As part of the determination of the variable portion of the compensation for the Chief Executive
Officer, upon recommendation of the Compensation Committee, the Board of Directors has set
financial performance indicators in his objectives and weightings for 2022.
It is specified that any variable compensation to the executive officers may only be paid subject to
shareholder approval pursuant to article L. 22-10-34 of the French Commercial Code.
Page 310
The performance criteria used to determine variable compensation are based on a plan of precise
objectives based on quantitative and qualitative criteria, which correspond to objectives common to
the Company. No individual objectives have been set. The objectives are based on criterias including
the financing of the Company as well as the performance of various key steps in the field of research
and development and business development.
The target level set for each criteria is strategic and economically sensitive information, which cannot
be made public.
In the event of the appointment of a new executive officer, these same principles will apply, whereby
it is specified that in the event of an appointment made during the second half of a financial year, the
performance assessment will be made on a discretionary basis by the Board of Directors.
Long-term and exceptional compensation
Long-term compensation
For the term of office of the Chairman of the Board of Directors and the Chief Executive Officer, the
executive officers can receive compensation allocated in the form of stock options and / or
performance shares, in accordance with the recommendations of the MiddleNext Code.
The performance shares which can be granted to the Chief Executive Officer are subject to a two-years
acquisition period and an additional one-year lock-up period. The performance conditions set out for
the purposes of the acquisition of the performance shares by the Board of Directors are based on
precise objectives (quantitative and qualitative criteria) which include, (i) certain clinical milestones to
be reached and (ii) certain business development milestones to be reached, in order to align the
vesting conditions of the Performance Shares with the interest of the Company’s shareholders.
The stock-options which can be granted to the Chairman of the Board of Directors are also subject to
performance conditions linked to his participation to the Board meetings as well as to the assessment
of the Board’s organization and functioning.
It is specified that any long-term compensation to the executive officers is subject to shareholder
approval pursuant to article L. 22-10-34 of the French Commercial Code.
Exceptional compensation
At its own discretion, the Board of Directors may award executive officers in office or appointed during
the financial year exceptional compensation in certain specific circumstances and in compliance with
the principles set out in the MiddleNext Code, noting that said compensation may only be paid subject
to shareholder approval pursuant to article L. 22-10-34 of the French Commercial Code.
Compensation or benefits due for termination of the executive officers’ office
Mr. Thomas Kuhn is owed compensation related to forced departure and a non-compete clause (see
Section 4.2.6 “Elements of compensation and benefits due or likely to be due owing to or after the
termination of the duties of executive officers of the Company”). Mr. Legault is not owed any
compensation related to forced departure and/or a non-compete clause.
Employment contract
Neither executive officer has an employment contract.
Benefits in kind
Mr. Thomas Kuhn benefits from GSC unemployment insurance for corporate officers. Mr. Pierre
Legault does not benefit from such mandatory social GSC insurance.
Supplementary pension plan
Neither executive officer benefits from a supplementary pension plan for his term of office.
Page 311
Civil liability insurance coverage for executive officers
Mr. Pierre Legault and Mr. Thomas Kuhn benefit from civil liability insurance for executive officers.
Application of the policy for 2022
At its meeting held on January 27, 2022, the Board of Directors resolved to determine the components
of compensation of the executive officers, through a structure which ensures a link with the Company’s
performance and maintenance of the balance between short-term and medium-term performance.
The Board of Directors decided to maintain the fixed compensation of the Chairman of the Board of
Directors and the fixed and variable compensation of the Chief Executive Officer unchanged as
compared to 2021, without any increase.
The Board of Directors also decided to grant 40,000 Stock Options to the Chairman of the Board giving
each the right to acquire one share of the Company at an exercise price of €4.12. This grant is subject
to performance conditions linked to the participation of the Chairman of the Board of Directors to the
Board meetings as well as to the assessment of the Board’s organization and functioning. The grant is
also subject to the approval of the shareholders at the 2022 General Assembly Meeting pursuant to
article L. 22-10-34 of the French Commercial Code.
Finally, the Board of Directors decided to allocate 160,000 Performance Shares to the Chief Executive
Officer which are subject to a two-years acquisition period and an additional one-year lock-up period.
In accordance article L. 225-197-1 II of the French Commercial Code and the decisions of the Board of
Director, the Chief Executive Officer is subject to a further obligation to retain at least 10% of the
acquired performance shares in registered form until the term of his mandate. The Performance
Shares which are subject to performance conditions which are based on precise objectives
(quantitative and qualitative criteria) which include, (i) certain clinical milestones to be reached and
(ii) certain business development milestones to be reached, in order to align the vesting conditions of
the Performance Shares with the interest of the Company’s shareholders. The allocation is also subject
to the approval of the shareholders at the 2022 General Assembly Meeting pursuant to article L. 22-
10-34 of the French Commercial Code.
4.2.1.2 Compensation policy of the directors
Directors receive a remuneration (previously called “Directors’ fees”). The maximum amount is
approved by the General Shareholder Meeting and then allocated between the members by the Board
of Directors in accordance with the remuneration policy.
The Board of Directors is proposing total authorized remuneration of €550,000 for 2022 with no
increase compared to 2021. It being specified that as of the date of this Universal Registration
Document and subject to adjustments in the course of the year within this limit, the Board of Directors
intends to allocate this envelope as follows:
-
-
a yearly base compensation of €50,000 for its independent Directors;
an additional compensation of €12,000 for members of the Audit and Business Development
and €17,000 for their Chairpersons;
-
-
-
an additional compensation of €10,000 for members of the Scientific Advisory and
Compensation Committee and €14,000 for their Chairpersons;
an additional compensation of €7,000 for members of the Appointments and Governance
Committee and €10,000 for its Chairperson;
an additional compensation of $20,000 per meeting for members of the Strategic
Committee.
Page 312
The following table summarizes these principles of remuneration of non-executive directors:
GOVERNANCE
BUSINESS
DEVELOPMENT
COMMITTEE
SCIENTIFIC
ADVISORY
COMMITTEE
BASE
COMPENSATION
AUDIT
COMMITTEE
COMPENSATION
COMMITTEE
AND
STRATEGIC
COMMITTEE
NAME
NOMINATIONS
COMMITTEE
JANICE
BOURQUE
50,000€
50,000€
50,000€
12,000€
-
-
-
-
10,000€*
-
-
KHOSO
BALUCH
12,000€
-
14,000€*
-
10,000€
-
20,000 $
-
PASCALE
BOISSEL
17,000€*
7,000
RICH
KENDER
50,000€
50,000€
50,000€
12,000€
17,000€*
1,000€**
-
10,000€
-
20,000 $
KUMI SATO
JOHN
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
14,000€
KOZARICH
* Chairperson
** As an exception to the principles set forth above, and in order to provide Mrs. Kumi Sato with flexibility in her work as member of the Business Development
committee she will receive a compensation of €1 000 per attended meeting.
Long-term and exceptional compensation
For the term of their office, Directors can receive warrants. In such case, the subscription price and the
exercise price of the warrants are determined after valuation by an independent expert and are
reflecting the fair market value of such instruments according to such independent expert so that they
are not considered compensation under the French Commercial Code.
Moreover, members of the Board may also receive exceptional remuneration for specific tasks, under
the fulfillment of performance conditions as established by the Board of Directors.
Page 313
4.2.2 Summary of the compensation of the executive officers
Table 1: Summary tables of compensation, options (warrants and/or SO) and Performance Shares
allocated to each executive corporate officer
Summary table of compensation, options and Performance Shares granted to each executive
corporate officer
Financial year Financial year
2020
2021
Mr. Pierre Legault, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Fees due for the financial year
€179,000
€192,006
Director’s remuneration
Value of year-on-year variable compensation granted during the
financial year
Value of Stock Options granted during the financial year (explained
in Table 4)
€169,925
€348,925
€398,542
€100,548
€292,554
€395,353
Value of Performance Shares awarded (explained in Table 6)
Total
Mr. Thomas Kuhn, Chief Executive Officer
Compensation due for the financial year (explained in Table 2)
Value of year-on-year variable compensation granted during the
financial year
Value of Stock Options granted during the financial year (explained
in Table 4)
Value of Performance Shares awarded (explained in Table 6)
€656,600 (1) €707,200 (1)
€1,055,142 €1,102,553
Total
(1)
Value of Performance Shares at the time of their allocation as used in the application of IFRS 2, based on
the last closing share price of the Company on the Euronext market before their allocation, i.e., €10.84 per
share for 2020 and €6.70 for 2021. The Performance Shares are subject to a two-years acquisition period
and an additional one-year lock-up period. The performance conditions set out for the purposes of the
acquisition of these incentive instruments are based on precise objectives (quantitative and qualitative
criteria) which include (i) share price performance, (ii) certain clinical milestones to be reached and (iii)
certain regulatory milestones to be reached, in order to align the vesting conditions of the Performance
Shares with the interest of the Company’s shareholders.
Page 314
4.2.3 Compensation of the corporate officers (including information stated in paragraph I of article
L. 22-10-9 of the French Commercial Code)
Table 2: Table summarizing the compensation of each executive officers
The following tables show the compensation due to executive officers in respect of the financial years
ended December 31, 2020 and 2021 and the compensation they received during these financial years.
Financial year 2020
Financial year 2021
amounts
due(1)
amounts
paid(2)
amounts
due(1)
amounts
paid(2)
Mr. Pierre Legault, Chairman of the Board of Directors
€179,000
€179,000
€192,006
€192,006
Fixed compensation
Variable compensation
Exceptional
compensation
Director’s
remuneration
Benefits in kind
€179,000
€179,000
€192,006
€192,006
TOTAL
Mr. Thomas Kuhn, Chief Executive Officer
€270,833
€270,833
€122,007
€295,833
€295,833
€115,104
Fixed compensation (3)
Variable compensation
(4)
€115,104
€88,750 (6)
Exceptional
compensation
Director’s
remuneration
€12,605
€12,605
€10,770
€10,770
Benefits in kind (5)
€398,542
€405,445
€395,353
€421,707
TOTAL
(1)
(2)
(3)
For financial year.
During the financial year.
The compensation of the Chief Executive Officer is provided for under his management contract (see
Section 4.4.2 “Significant agreements entered into with related parties” of this Universal Registration
Document).
(4)
The variable compensation of the Chief Executive Officer (of a maximum percentage of fixed compensation
– 50% for the 2020 and 2021 financial years) is based on a plan of precise objectives (quantitative and
qualitative criteria) corresponding to objectives common to all employees. For 2021, these objectives were
based on the share price performance as well as on the timeliness of initiation of clinical trials, fulfilment
of regulatory milestones and obtaining dilutive and non-dilutive financing. Variable compensation is paid
during the course of Year N+1. Variable compensation of the Chief Executive Officer for the 2020 financial
year has been paid further to the approval of the General Meeting of Shareholders of June 23, 2021.
Variable compensation of the Chief Executive Officer for the 2021 financial year will be paid in one
installment, subject to approval of the 2022 General Meeting of Shareholders.
(5)
(6)
Benefits in kind correspond to GSC unemployment insurance.
2021 variable compensation of the Chief Executive Officer corresponding to an 60% achievement of the
objectives set by the Board of Directors on January 27, 2021.
Page 315
Table 3: Table of compensation received by non-executive directors
Amounts paid
during financial during financial
year 2020 (1)
Amounts paid
Non-executive directors
Mr. Khoso Baluch
Compensation
year 2021 (2)
Directors’ remuneration
(fixed, variable)
€90,000
€103,189
Other compensation (3)
Directors’ remuneration
(fixed, variable)
Other compensation (3)
Directors’ remuneration
(fixed, variable)
-
-
€74,000
€74,000
Ms. Pascale Boissel
Mr. Rich Kender
-
-
€93,000
€106,189
Other compensation (3)
Directors’ remuneration
(fixed, variable)
Other compensation (3)
Directors’ remuneration
(fixed, variable)
-
-
€72,000
€72,000
Ms. Janice Bourque
Ms. Kumi Sato
-
-
€52,000
€52,000
Other compensation (3)
Directors’ remuneration
(fixed, variable)
-
-
-
€30,729
Mr. Thierry Hercend (4)
Other compensation (3)
Directors’ remuneration
(fixed, variable)
0 €
0 €
€25,000
Mr. John Kozarich (5)
TOTAL
Other compensation (3)
€411,729
€432,378
(1)
The General Meeting of Shareholders of May 9, 2019 resolved to award total authorized allocation of
attendance fees of €440,000. On January 29, 2020, the Board of Directors approved an allocation of
attendance fees to the independent directors and to Mr. Thierry Hercend totaling €50,000 for the 2020
financial year. In addition to this compensation, a remuneration is awarded to Directors for their
participation in the Board Committees, as follows:
Audit Committee Chairperson €17,000, Member €12,000;
Business Development Committee Chairperson €17,000, Member €12,000;
Compensation Committee Chairperson €14,000, Member €10,000;
Scientific Advisory Committee Chairperson €14,000, Member €10,000;
Appointments and Governance Committee Chairperson €10,000, Member €7,000;
Strategic and Pricing Committee €1,000 per meeting.
(2)
(3)
On January 29, 2021, the Board of Directors approved an allocation of attendance fees to the independent
directors totaling €50,000 for the 2020 financial year. In addition to this compensation, a remuneration is
awarded to Directors for their participation in the Board Committees, in the same manner as for the 2020
financial year (see footnote (1)).
The Directors received warrants in 2020 and 2021 financial years (see also Section 4.5.2.4.1 “Stock
subscription warrant plan”). The subscription price and the exercise price of the warrants were determined
after valuation by an independent expert and were reflecting the fair market value of such instruments
according to such independent expert.
(4)
(5)
The term of office of Mr. Thierry Hercend as Board member was not renewed and ended on June 24, 2020,
after the Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders ruling on the financial statements for the financial
year ended on December 31, 2019.
Mr. John Kozarich was appointed as a Director at the June 23, 2021, General Meeting of the Shareholders.
For the 2021 financial year, Mr. John Kozarich also received a compensation of €37,494 under a consulting
agreement with the Company which was terminated once Mr. John Kozarich was appointed as Director.
Page 316
Table 4: Warrants or stock options awarded to each executive officer by the Company or any
company of its Group during the financial years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021
Value of
Nature of the options
the
according
Total
Subscription
price per
share
Executive corporate
officers
Date of
allocation
Maturity
date
options to the Black options
(BSA or
SO)
& Scholes allocated
method (in
euros)
Stock
Options
Stock
Feb 14,
2030
Jan 27,
2031
Pierre Legault
Feb 14, 2020
Jan 27, 2021
€4.25
€2.51
40,000
€10.26
€6.64
Pierre Legault
40,000
Options
TOTAL
80,000
Table 5: Warrants or stock options exercised by each executive corporate officer during the financial
years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021
None.
Table 6: Performance shares awarded to each executive officer during the financial years ended
December 31, 2020 and 2021
Value of the
Number of
shares
performance according to
Plan
number
and date
(1)
Name of the
corporate
officer
shares
awarded
the method
used for the Vesting date availability
Date of
Performance
conditions
during the consolidated
(3)
financial
year
financial
statements
(2)
2020 Plan,
Board
Thomas Kuhn meeting of
January 29,
January 29, January 29,
100,000
160,000
€656,600
2022
2023
YES (4)
YES (4)
2020
2021 Plan,
Board
Thomas Kuhn meeting of
January 27,
January 27, January 27,
2023 2024
€707,200
2021
(1)
(2)
Date of allocation of performance shares (date of Board of Directors meeting).
Value of Performance Shares at the time of their allocation as used in the application of IFRS 2, based on
the last closing share price of the Company on the Euronext market before their allocation, i.e., €10.84 per
share for 2020 and €6.70 for 2021, after specifically taking into account any discount related to
performance criteria and the probability of the holder’s presence in the Company at the end of the vesting
Page 317
period, but before spreading the expense over the vesting period under IFRS 2. The Performance Shares
are subject to a two-years acquisition period and an additional one-year lock-up period.
In accordance article L. 225-197-1 II of the French Commercial Code and the decisions of the Board of
Director, the Chief Executive Officer is subject to obligation to retain at least 10% of the acquired
performance shares in registered form until the term of his mandate.
The Performance Shares were allocated to Thomas Kuhn subject to the fulfillment of performance
conditions determined by the Board of Directors under a one-year plan for the 2020 and 2021 Performance
Shares. The performance conditions set out for the purposes of the acquisition of these incentive
instruments are based on precise objectives (quantitative and qualitative criteria) which include (i) share
price performance as well as (ii) certain clinical milestones to be reached and (iii) certain regulatory
milestones to be reached, in order to align the vesting conditions of such Performance Shares with the
interest of the Company’s shareholders.
(3)
(4)
Table 7: Performance Shares granted that became available to each executive officer during the
financial years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021
Number of
Performance Shares
granted that became
available during the
financial year (2)
Theorical number of
Performance Shares
upon initial grant (3)
Name of the corporate Plan number and date
officer
(1)
2018 Plan, Board
meeting of January 25,
2018
Thomas Kuhn
Thomas Kuhn
21,500 (4)
17,826 (5)
33,300
26,666
2019 Plan, Board
meeting of January 24,
2019
(1)
(2)
(3)
Date of allocation of Performance Shares (date of Board of Directors meeting).
These Performance Shares remain subject to an additional one-year lock-up period.
Potential number of Performance Shares to be acquired as set by the Board of Directors at the date of
allocation.
(4)
(5)
Based on the achievement of 67% of the performance conditions for the third tranche of 2018 Performance
Shares as assessed by the Board of Directors.
Based on the achievement of 67% of the performance conditions for the second tranche of the 2019
Performance Shares as assessed by the Board of Directors.
Table 8: History of the allocations of warrants or founder warrants granted to corporate officers
See tables in Sections 4.2.5 “Warrants, Founder Warrants, Stock Options and Performance Shares
4.5.2.4.1 “Stock subscription warrant plan” and 4.2.5.4.2 “Founder Warrant (BSPCE) Plan” of this
Universal Registration Document .
Page 318
Table 9: Warrants and Stock Options granted to the top 10 employees of the Group who are not
corporate officers and warrants exercised by them
2020
2021
Warrants
SO
Warrants
SO
January 27,
2021 &
November
19, 2021
February 14,
2020
Date of the Board of Directors meeting
Weighted average price
N/A
N/A
N/A
0
€10.26
N/A
0
€6.52
Number of rights granted during each of these
financial years to the ten Group employees
with the largest number of rights granted as of
December 31, 2020
380,000
424,500
Number of rights exercised during each of
these financial years by the ten Group
employees with the largest number of rights
exercised as of December 31, 2020
0
0
0
0
Table 10: Previous allotments of Performance Shares.
Please refer to Section 4.5.2.4.4 “Performance share plan
Table 11: Table summarizing the employment contracts and commitments given to executive
corporate officers
The following table provides details about the conditions of compensation and other benefits granted
to executive corporate officers:
Compensation or
benefits due or
likely to be due Compensation
Employment Supplementary
as a result of
linked to a non-
contract
pension plan
Executive corporate officers
termination or compete clause
change of
function
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
No
Mr. Pierre Legault, Chairman
of the Board of Directors
X
X
X
X
Start date of mandate: General Meeting of Shareholders of January
29, 2016 (Renewal: General Meeting of Shareholders of May 9, 2019)
End date of mandate: General Meeting of Shareholders called to
approve the financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2021
Mr. Thomas Kuhn, Chief
Executive Officer
X
X
X (1) (2)
X (1)
Start date of mandate: Board of Directors of June 23, 2010
End date of mandate: N/A
(1)
(2)
See section 4.2.6 “Elements of compensation and benefits due or likely to be due owing to or after the
termination of the duties of executive officers of the Company”.
Thomas Kuhn has a GSC corporate officer insurance policy.
Page 319
4.2.4 Sums set aside or reported by the Company for the purposes of payment of pensions,
retirement or other benefits to directors and managers
The Company did not book any provisions for pensions, retirement payments or any other benefits for
corporate officers.
The Company did not grant any sign-on or severance bonuses to any corporate officer.
4.2.5 Warrants, Founder Warrants, Stock Options and Performance Shares granted to the corporate
officers
Performance
Shares
Total number of
potential shares (2)
Director and officer concerned
BSPCE
Warrants
SO
Pierre Legault (Chairman of the Board of
Directors)
85 000
312 500
397 500
Thomas Kuhn (CEO)
Mohammed Khoso Baluch
Richard Kender
Pascale Boissel
50 000
160 000
210 000
130 000
130 000
130 000
100 000
130 000
40 000
89 625 (1)
130 000
130 000
100 000
130 000
40 000
Kumi Sato
Janice Bourque
John Kozarich
(1)
(2)
Certain warrants issued before 2015 entitles the holder to subscribe in cash for twenty (20) new shares
per warrant
As of the December 31, 2021
See Sections 4.5.2.4.1 “Stock subscription warrant Plan,” 4.2.5.4.2 “Founder Warrant (BSPCE) Plan,”
4.5.2.4.3 “Stock Option Plan” and 4.5.2.4.4 “Performance Share Plan” of this Universal Registration
Document for details of the terms and conditions for exercising the various categories of warrants and
founder warrants, Stock Options and Performance Shares.
4.2.6 Elements of compensation and benefits due or likely to be due owing to or after the
termination of the duties of executive officers of the Company
Under his management agreement entered into with the Company on June 20, 2019 (see Section 4.4.2
Significant agreement concluded with related parties”), the Chief Executive Officer is owed
compensation during his term of office related to forced departure without cause and a non-compete
clause as set below:
(i)
a compensation of one year of his fixed compensation at the date of the termination.
(ii)
if not paid yet, the earned variable compensation of the calendar year preceding the one in
which the termination occurs
(iii) the earned variable compensation of the calendar year in which the termination occurs, in
proportion of his effective presence
Page 320
(iv) an amount equal to 100% of the variable compensation for the year in which the termination
occurs, based on his fixed compensation at the date of the termination
(v)
a non-competition clause with a monthly compensation, for 18 months, of 50% of the average
gross remuneration he received over the course of the 12 months preceding the termination.
4.2.7 Loans and guarantees granted to management
None.
4.2.8 Management compensation and Employee Compensation
The following tables provide comparison details between the average and median compensation of
the Company’s employees and the compensation of the executive corporate officers during the last
five financial years, in accordance with law n°2019-486 dated May 22, 2019 on business growth and
transformation (the “Pacte Law”), and articles L. 22-10-9, 6° and 7° of the French Commercial Code.
The following ratios have been calculated on the basis of fixed and variable compensation paid during
the financial years.
In 2021, the Group has decided to change the method of calculating these ratios, in accordance with
current market practices. The value of warrants, stock options, founder warrants and performance
shares is no longer included in the compensation for the years presented.
4.2.1.3 Comparison details between the average and the median compensation of the Group’s
employees and the compensation of the executive corporate officers during the last five
financial years (1)(2)
The comparison table below applies to all employees of the Group.
Financial year
2017
Financial year
2018
Financial year
2019
Financial year
2020
Financial year
2021
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Ratio with the median
compensation of the
Group’s employees (1)
1.37
0.84
2.17
1.36
2.40
1.68
2.39
1.58
2.63
1.69
Ratio with the average
compensation of the
Group’s employees (2)
Chief Executive Officer
Ratio with the median
compensation of the
Group’s employees (1)
3.35
2.07
4.46
2.79
4.66
3.25
5.41
3.57
5.77
3.72
Ratio with the average
compensation of the
Group’s employees (2)
(1)
(2)
The ratio has been calculated in application with the following formula: (Total Compensation of the
Chairman of the Board of Directors) / Median annual compensation of the Group’s employees) and (Total
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer / Median annual compensation of the Group’s employees).
The ratio has been calculated in application with the following formulas: (Total Compensation of the
Chairman of the Board of Directors / Average annual compensation of the Group’s employees) and (Total
Compensation of the Chief Executive Officer / Average annual compensation of the Group’s employees).
Page 321
In 2021, in accordance with MiddleNext recommendations, the Group has calculated ratios between
compensations of the executive corporate officers and the legal minimum wage in France. These ratios
amount to 10.29 for the Chairman of the Board of Directors and 22.61 for the CEO.
4.2.8.1 Evolution of the compensation of the Company’s employees and the compensation of the
executive corporate officers during the last five financial years
Financial year Financial year
Financial year Financial year
Financial year
2021
€421,707
€16,262
Chief Executive Officer
2017
2018
€305,831
€62,566
26%
2019
€327,517
€21,686
7%
2020
€405,445
€77,928
24%
Compensation
Evolution (absolute figures)
Evolution (%)
€243,265
4%
Chairman of the Board of Financial year Financial year
Financial year Financial year
Financial year
2021
€192,006
€13,006
7%
Directors
2017
2018
€148,750
€49,500
50%
2019
€169,030
€20,280
14%
2020
€179,000
€9,970
6%
Compensation
€99,250
Evolution (absolute figures)
Evolution (%)
Financial year Financial year
Financial year Financial year
Financial year
2021
€113,392
€-56
Group’s employees
2017
2018
€109,563
€-7,973
-7%
2019
€100,762
€-8,801
-8%
2020
€113,448
€12,685
13%
Compensation
Evolution (absolute figures)
Evolution (%)
€117,536
0%
Financial year Financial year
Financial year Financial year
Financial year
2021
Consolidated net result (in k€)
2017
2018
1,301
23,599
-106%
2019
2020
-31,858
-6,115
24%
Net result (in k€)
Evolution (absolute figures)
Evolution (%)
-22,298
-25,743
-27,044
-2,079%
-23,762
8,069
-25%
4.2.9 Elements of the 2021 compensation of the corporate officers
The elements which make up the total compensation and benefits in kind paid during or allocated for
the previous financial year, are the subject of the resolution proposed to the General Meeting of June
21, 2022, pursuant to article L. 22-10-34 of the French Commercial Code
The compensation components for the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer for the financial year
ended on December 31, 2021, as described below, have been approved by the General Meeting of
Shareholders on June 23, 2021.
Chairman of the Board of Directors – Mr. Pierre Legault
Mr. Pierre Legault does not receive any variable compensation for 2021 for his term of office as
Chairman of the Board of Directors.
For his term of office as Chairman of the Board of Directors, it is specified that for financial years 2020
and 2021, Mr. Pierre Legault received compensation allocated in the form of stock options, in
accordance with the recommendations of the MiddleNext Code.
For financial year 2021, Mr. Pierre Legault, Chairman of the Board of Directors since March 31, 2016,
has received compensation totaling €192,006. On January 27, 2021, the Board of Directors awarded
him 40,000 options giving right to subscribe shares, for a subscription price of €6.64 per share
(corresponding to the closing share price on the Euronext market immediately preceding the Board of
Directors meeting). He does not benefit from benefits in kind and has not signed any contract of
employment with the Company.
Page 322
Chief Executive Officer – Mr. Thomas Kuhn
Mr. Thomas Kuhn, Chief Executive Officer, was awarded a fixed compensation totaling €295,833.
Mr. Thomas Kuhn’s target variable annual compensation is subject to performance criteria, for which
the targets are set every year. It corresponds to a maximum percentage of the amount of his fixed
compensation determined on an annual basis by the Board of Directors on the Compensation
Committee’s recommendations. This percentage was 50% of the 2021 financial year.
The variable compensation of the Chief Executive Officer is based on a plan of precise objectives
(quantitative and qualitative criteria) corresponding to objectives common to all employees. For 2021,
these objectives were based on the share price performance as well as on the timeliness of initiation
of clinical trials, fulfilment of regulatory milestones and obtaining dilutive and non-dilutive financing.
The Board of Directors of the Company decided on January 27, 2022 to award the Chief Executive
Officer a variable compensation totaling €88,750, corresponding to an 60% achievement of the targets
set by the Board of Directors on January 27, 2021. The variable compensation of the Chief Executive
Officer for the 2021financial year will be paid in 2022, in one installment, subject to approval of the
General Meeting of Shareholders of June 21, 2022.
He received benefits in kind during the 2021 financial year totaling €10,770 under a GSC corporate
officer insurance policy.
On January 24, 2021, the Board of Directors awarded him 160,000 performance shares subject to
presence and performance conditions determined by the Board of Directors under a one-year plan.
The performance conditions set out for the purposes of the acquisition of these incentive instruments
are based on precise objectives (quantitative and qualitative criteria) which include (i) share price
performance as well as (ii) certain clinical milestones to be reached and (iii) certain regulatory
milestones to be reached, in order to align the vesting conditions of such Performance Shares with the
interest of the Company’s shareholders.
He has not signed a contract of employment with the Company.
Under his management agreement entered into with the Company on June 20, 2019 (see Section 4.4.2
Significant agreements concluded with related parties”), the Chief Executive Officer is owed
compensation during his term of office related to forced departure without cause and a non-compete
clause as set below:
(i) a compensation of one year of his fixed compensation at the date of the termination.
(ii) if not paid yet, the earned variable compensation of the calendar year preceding the one in
which the termination occurs
(iii) the earned variable compensation of the calendar year in which the termination occurs, in
proportion of his effective presence
(iv) an amount equal to 100% of the variable compensation for the year in which the termination
occurs, based on his fixed compensation at the date of the termination
(v) a non-competition clause with a monthly compensation, for 18 months, of 50% of the
average gross remuneration he received over the course of the 12 months preceding the
termination.
Directors
The General Meeting of Shareholders on June 23, 2021 has approved the compensation policy for the
corporate officers pursuant to article L. 22-10-8 of the French Commercial Code. On January 27, 2021,
the Board of Directors approved an allocation of attendance fees to the independent directors totaling
€50,000 for the 2021 financial year. In addition to this compensation, attendance fees are assigned to
directors as a function of their participation in the Board Committees, as follows:
Page 323
Audit Committee Chairperson €17,000, Member €12,000 (it being specified that as an exception to
these principles, and in order to provide Mrs. Kumi Sato with flexibility in her work as member of the
Business Development committee she will receive a compensation of €1 000 per attended meeting).;
Business Development Committee Chairperson €17,000, Member €12,000;
Compensation Committee Chairperson €14,000, Member €10,000;
Scientific Advisory Committee Chairperson €14,000, Member €10,000;
Appointments and Governance Committee Chairperson €10,000, Member €7,000;
Strategic Committee Member $20,000.
For their term of office as Directors, it is specified that for financial years 2020 and 2021, the Directors
received warrants (see also Section 4.5.2.4.1 “Stock subscription warrant plan”). The subscription price
and the exercise price of the warrants were determined after valuation by an independent expert and
were reflecting the fair market value of such instruments according to such independent expert and
are not considered compensation under the French Commercial Code.
The detailed compensation received by each Director of the Company individually is described in
Section 4.2.3 “Compensation of the corporate officers (including information stated in paragraph I of
article L. 22-10-9 of the French Commercial Code)”, Table 3.
Page 324
4.3
Shareholding and stock performance
4.3.1 Share capital and voting right distribution
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, and in accordance with Article L. 233-13 of the
French Commercial Code, as far as the company is aware, the ownership structure and the identity of
shareholders directly or indirectly holding more than 5% of the share capital or voting rights at general
meetings is as follows:
Shareholders
Total shares
Voting rights
Capital %
Voting rights %
Thomas Kuhn (1)
Other Founders
Subtotal Founders (2)
FCPR Innobio
1,613,072
1,165,875
2,778,947
2,174,354
1,613,072
1,165,875
2,778,947
2,174,354
5.57%
4.03%
9.60%
7.51%
5.58%
4.04%
9.62%
7.53%
Bpifrance
Participations
2,588,091
2,588,091
8.94%
8.96%
Other Bpifrance
affiliated funds
992,308
992,308
3,43%
3,43%
BPIfrance subtotal
5,754,753
5,754,753
19,88%
19,92%
Roivant Sciences Ltd
1,431,399
9,965,099
18,929,941
1,431,399
9,965,099
18,929,941
4.94%
34,42%
65,38%
4.95%
34,49%
65,51%
Subtotal of
shareholders holding
more than 5% of share
capital (2)
Public
Self-held
57,010
N/A
0.20%
N/A
Total
28,952,050
28,895,040
100.00%
100.00%
(1)
(2)
Founding individual who is a corporate officer
There is no concerted action between these shareholders, who are presented under the subtotals for
purposes of comprehension only
As far as the Company is aware, there are no other shareholders holding directly or indirectly, alone
or in concert, more than 5% of the capital or voting rights at the date of this Universal Registration
Document.
See Section 4.5.2.4 “Convertible or exchangeable securities or securities with attached warrants” of
this Universal Registration Document for details on the conditions for conversion of the convertible
bonds, exercise of subscription or founders’ warrants, and subscription options for performance
shares, and Section 4.5.2.7.1 “Table showing changes in the capital over the last three financial years
for a detailed presentation of capital increases.
Page 325
4.3.2 Significant shareholders not represented on the Board of directors
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, BpiFrance and its affiliated entities and Roivant
Sciences Ltd are significant shareholders who are not members of the Company Board of Directors.
4.3.3 Recent transactions with regard to the share capital of the Company
On June 22, 2021, 2,875 warrants were exercised, which resulted in the creation of 57,500 new
ordinary shares and in a share capital increase, as recorded by the Board on June 23, 2021 of €1,150.
On June 23, 2021, 1,604 performance shares were acquired which resulted in a share capital increase
as recorded by the Board on June 23, 2021, of €32.08.
On September 25, 2021, 33,334 performance shares were acquired which resulted in a share capital
increase as recorded by the Board on September 26, 2021, of €666,68.
On January 24, 2021, 30,307 performance shares were acquired which resulted in a share capital
increase as recorded by the Board on January 27, 2021, of €606,14.
On January 29, 2021, 218,051 performance shares were acquired which resulted in a share capital
increase as recorded by the Board on January 31, 2021, of €4,361.02.
4.3.4 Transactions in securities carried out by executives and persons mentioned in Article L. 621-
18-2 of the French Monetary and Financial Code
During the 2021 financial year, Mr. Thomas Kuhn, Chief Executive Officer of the Company acquired 25
263 performance shares: (i) 17 826 performance shares pursuant to the 2019 share performance plan
decided by the Board of Directors of the Company, upon delegation of the General Meeting of
Shareholders, on January 24, 2019 and (ii) 7 437 performance shares pursuant to the 2018 share
performance plan decided by the Board of Directors of the Company, upon the delegation of the
General Meeting of Shareholders, on January 25,2018 . This amount corresponds to the third tranche
of the 2018 performance shares for which 67% of the performance conditions have been achieved, as
assessed by the Board of Directors upon recommendation of the Compensation committee on January
26, 2021.
No other transaction in securities has been carried out by executives and persons mentioned in Article
L. 621-18-2 of the French Monetary and Financial Code.
4.3.5 Voting rights of the main shareholders
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, the voting rights of each shareholder are equal
to the number of shares held by each of them.
The general meeting of shareholders held on January 8, 2015 resolved to remove the automatic double
voting rights as provided for by French law No. 2014-384 of March 29, 2014 aimed at recapturing the
real economy.
4.3.6 Control of the Company
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, no shareholder individually holds either control
of the Company, or a percentage likely to lead to the presumption of control of the Company within
the meaning of the provisions of Article L. 233-3 of the French Commercial Code.
4.3.7 Agreements that may result in a change of control
No particular provision of the bylaws, any charter or any regulations of the issuer may result in
delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control.
Page 326
4.3.8 Agreements between the shareholders of which the Company is aware and that may result in
restrictions on the transfer of shares and the exercise of voting rights
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, the Company is not aware of any agreement
that may result in restrictions on the transfer of shares and the exercise of voting rights.
4.3.9 Pledges of Company security
As far as the Company is aware, there is no pledge of the Company’s securities.
4.3.10 Crossing of thresholds
In the 2021 financial year, the Company has been made aware of the following thresholds crossing:
-
-
-
further to a legal threshold crossing notification published by the AMF on September 22, 2021,
Roivant Sciences Ltd stated that, on August 2, 2021, as a result of the increase of the share
capital and voting rights of the Company, it had crossed the threshold of 5% of the capital and
voting rights of the Company downwards and that it sill held 1,431,399 shares of the Company
representing 4,99% of the capital and voting rights of the Company;
further to a statutory threshold crossing notification published by the AMF on November 4,
2021, Caisse des Dépôts et Consignations stated that on November 2, 2021, as a result of
purchase of shares of the Company, it had crossed the threshold of 20% of the capital and
voting rights of the Company upwards and that it now held 5,744,635 shares of the Company
representing 20,01% of the capital and voting rights of the Company;
further to a legal threshold crossing notification published by the AMF on December 27, 2021,
Andera Partners stated that, on December 21, 2021, it had crossed the threshold of 5% of the
capital and voting rights of the Company downwards and that it held 1,429,223 shares of the
Company representing 4,98% of the capital and voting rights of the Company.
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, the Company has been made aware of the
following additional thresholds crossing:
-
further to a legal threshold crossing notification published by the AMF on March 10, 2022,the
Caisse des dépôts et consignations (“CDC”) stated that, on March 7, 2022, as a result of sale of
shares of the Company on the market, it had crossed the threshold of 20% of the capital and
voting rights of the Company downwards and that it held 5,754,753 shares of the Company
representing 19.87% of the capital and voting rights of the Company.
4.3.11 Changes in the share price
The Company’s shares have been listed on the Euronext Paris regulated market under the symbol
“POXEL.PA” since February 6, 2015.
The following table describes the changes in the closing price of the Company’s share on Euronext Paris
during the 2021 financial year:
PERIOD
HIGH
LOW
First quarter of 2021
Second quarter of 2021
Third quarter of 2021
Fourth quarter of 2021
€7.62
€7.61
€6.98
€6.04
€6.41
€6.44
€5.75
€4.81
Page 327
4.4
Related party transactions
4.4.1 Intra-group transactions
During the 2021 financial year, the Company engaged in intra-group activities with its subsidiaries as
described in Section 2.4.1.3 “Group financial flows” of this Universal Registration Document.
An intercompany cost sharing agreement was entered into between the Company and Poxel Japan KK
on March 8, 2018 for a one-year period, beginning as from April 1, 2018, which is tacitly renewable for
successive periods of one year unless one of the parties gives a 6-month prior notice to terminate the
agreement. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company and Poxel Japan KK agreed to share costs
incurred in the course of development and licensing of the Company’s drug candidates. The services
provided are notably the following: (i) medical and clinical operations which are driven by the Company
and locally managed by Poxel Japan KK in Japan, (ii) regulatory affairs which are driven by the Company
and locally managed by Poxel Japan KK, (iii) other services regarding general management, assistance
with quality control and regulatory affairs, etc.
An amended and restated costs sharing agreement was entered into, effective on December 31, 2019.
This agreement includes the activities of Poxel Inc., created in 2019.
The Company and Poxel Inc. agreed to share costs incurred in the course of: (i) business development
activities, (ii) investor relations activities, (iii) regulatory and medical affairs activities and (iv) other
services regarding general management, quality insurance and administrative policies and assistance.
Pursuant to this agreement, the Company and Poxel Japan KK/Poxel Inc. are compensated for the
services provided in an amount equal to actual costs and expenses incurred in this context with a
margin of 5 %. The amount of the costs is determined and updated each year.
Pursuant to this agreement, the Company and Poxel Japan KK/Poxel Inc. also agreed to grant each
other interest bearing current account advances or loans, depending on their available cash resources
and respective cash flow needs. Such current account advances or loans shall bear interest at an annual
rate equal to the 3-month EURIBOR (unless less than zero, in which case the EURIBOR shall be deemed
to be zero) + 0.5%.
4.4.2 Significant agreements concluded with related parties
a) On June 20, 2019, as authorized by the Board of Directors on June 20, 2019 and ratified by the
General Meeting of Shareholders on June 24, 2020, a management agreement was entered into
between the Company and Thomas Kuhn.
It sets out the conditions for the performance of Thomas Kuhn’s office in his capacity as Chief Executive
Officer of the Company and will terminate on the date of removal or non-renewal of his office. This
agreement is the only agreement concerning the work relationship between Mr. Kuhn and the
Company.
Mr. Kuhn’s compensation is determined on a yearly basis by the Board of Directors upon
recommendation of the Compensation Committee.
The agreement was entered into for the duration of the term of office of Mr. Kuhn as Chief Executive
Officer, notwithstanding the right of removal of the Board of Directors. Therefore, the Board will not
make any decision with regard to the renewal of this agreement as long as the term of office of Thomas
Kuhn continues. Mr. Kuhn may be revoked, in accordance with the terms of the Company’s by-laws,
or resign, with a four-month notice. Such notice may be waived by the Board of Directors, subject to
compensation for the total amount of compensation due for such period.
Thomas Kuhn received compensation of € 395,353 for his services in 2021.
b) On December 12, 2014 the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Khoso Baluch to indemnify
him for legal costs and convictions he may incur in the event that any liability is imposed against him
in his capacity as a Company director, to the fullest permitted by applicable law, except in the event
Page 328
that is finally determined that: (i) the beneficiary’s conduct forming the subject matter of the
proceeding was not consistent with the corporate interests of the Company (ii) the beneficiary’s
conduct was in bad faith, knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest or constituted willful
misconduct.
This agreement will remain in force for 10 years following termination of Khoso Baluch’s duties as
director and, if necessary, for one year following the termination of any proceedings still ongoing after
this 10-year period.
c) On December 12, 2014 the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Richard Kender to
indemnify him for the legal costs and convictions he may incur in the event that any liability is imposed
against him in his capacity as a Company director, to the fullest permitted by applicable law, except in
the event that is finally determined that: (i) the beneficiary’s conduct forming the subject matter of
the proceeding was not consistent with the corporate interests of the Company (ii) the beneficiary’s
conduct was in bad faith, knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest or constituted willful
misconduct.. This agreement was entered into following his appointment as a director of the Company
on January 8, 2015. This agreement will remain in force for 10 years following termination of Richard
Kender’s duties as director and, if necessary, for one year following the termination of any proceedings
still ongoing after this 10-year period.
d) On March 31, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Pierre Legault to indemnify
him for the legal costs and convictions he may incur in the event that any liability is imposed against
him, in his capacity as a Company director, to the fullest permitted by applicable law, except in the
event that is finally determined that: (i) the beneficiary’s conduct forming the subject matter of the
proceeding was not consistent with the corporate interests of the Company (ii) the beneficiary’s
conduct was in bad faith, knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest or constituted willful
misconduct.. This agreement was set up in the context of the nomination of Mr. Pierre Legault as a
director on March 31, 2016. It aims to offer a guarantee in consideration for duties performed. This
agreement will remain in force for 10 years following the termination of his duties as a director and, if
necessary, for one year following the termination of any proceedings still ongoing after this 10-year
period.
e) On March 31, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Ms. Janice Bourque to indemnify
her for the legal costs and convictions she may incur in the event that any liability is imposed against
her, in her capacity as a Company director, to the fullest permitted by applicable law, except in the
event that is finally determined that: (i) the beneficiary’s conduct forming the subject matter of the
proceeding was not consistent with the corporate interests of the Company (ii) the beneficiary’s
conduct was in bad faith, knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest or constituted willful
misconduct.. This agreement was set up in the context of the nomination of Ms. Janice Bourque as a
director on March 31, 2016. It aims to offer a guarantee in consideration for duties performed. This
agreement will remain in force for 10 years following the termination of her duties as a director and,
if necessary, for one year following the termination of any proceedings still ongoing after this 10-year
period.
f) On March 16, 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Ms. Pascale Boissel to indemnify
her for the legal costs and convictions she may incur in the event that any liability is imposed against
her, in her capacity as a Company director, to the fullest permitted by applicable law, in the event that
is finally determined that: (i) the beneficiary’s conduct forming the subject matter of the proceeding
was not consistent with the corporate interests of the Company (ii) the beneficiary’s conduct was in
bad faith, knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest or constituted willful misconduct.. It aims to
offer a guarantee in consideration for duties performed. This agreement will continue in force for 10
years following the termination of her duties as a director and, if necessary, for one year following the
termination of any proceedings still ongoing after this 10-year period.
Page 329
g) On August 1, 2017 the Company entered into an agreement with Ms. Kumi Sato to indemnify her
for the legal costs and convictions she may incur in the event that any liability is imposed against her,
in her capacity as a Company director, to the fullest permitted by applicable law, except in the event
that is finally determined that: (i) the beneficiary’s conduct forming the subject matter of the
proceeding was not consistent with the corporate interests of the Company (ii) the beneficiary’s
conduct was in bad faith, knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest or constituted willful
misconduct. It aims to offer a guarantee in consideration for duties performed. This agreement will
remain in force for 10 years following the termination of her duties as a director and, if necessary, for
one year following the termination of any proceedings still ongoing after this 10-year period.
h) On June 1, 2018, the Company signed a service agreement with Cosmo Public Relations
Corporations, a company chaired and managed by Kumi Sato, member of the Board of Directors, under
the terms of which Cosmo Public Relations Corporations is committed to providing communication
services to the Company. The signature of this service agreement has been ratified, in accordance with
the applicable provisions of the French Code de commerce, by the Company's General Meeting of
Shareholders of May 9, 2019.
i) On June 25, 2021 the Company entered into an agreement with Dr. John Warren Kozarich to
indemnify him for the legal costs and convictions he may incur in the event that any liability is imposed
against him, in his capacity as a Company director, to the fullest permitted by applicable law, except in
the event that is finally determined that: (i) the beneficiary’s conduct forming the subject matter of
the proceeding was not consistent with the corporate interests of the Company (ii) the beneficiary’s
conduct was in bad faith, knowingly fraudulent or deliberately dishonest or constituted willful
misconduct. It aims to offer a guarantee in consideration for duties performed. This agreement will
remain in force for 10 years following the termination of his duties as a director and, if necessary, for
one year following the termination of any proceedings still ongoing after this 10-year period.
4.4.3 Procedure to identify regulated agreements
The Board of Directors, in accordance with article L.22-10-10 and L. 22-10-12 of the French Commercial
Code, approved an internal policy relating to the identification of transactions with related persons on
March 26, 2020. This policy is reviewed annually and formalizes the process implemented to identify
the related persons transactions as well as the evaluation of agreements entered into in the ordinary
course of business and on arms’ length terms.
The internal policy describes (i) prohibited agreements, (ii) related-party agreements subject to specific
control procedure, (iii) criteria for the definition of “ordinary course of business” and “arms’ length
terms” as well as (iv) standards for review, approval and/or ratification of related person transactions.
The Company will determine on or before the execution date of each related person transaction if such
transaction falls under the scope of this policy and as the case may be, if such related person
transaction is deemed undertaken in the ordinary course of business and entered into on arms’ length
terms. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors shall be involved in such procedure, as the
case may be. This policy will be reviewed each year by the Board of Directors, upon recommendation
of the Audit Committee.
Page 330
4.4.4 Special report of the statutory auditors on regulated agreements
The English version is a free translation into English of the Statutory Auditors’ special report on
regulated agreements issued in the French language and is provided solely for the convenience of
English-speaking readers. This report on regulated agreements should be read in conjunction with,
and construed in accordance with, French law and professional auditing standards applicable in
France. It should be understood that the agreements reported on are only those provided for in the
French Commercial Code and that the report does not apply to related party transactions described
in IAS 24 or other equivalent accounting standards.
To the annual General Meeting of POXEL,
In our capacity as Statutory Auditors of your company, we present our report on regulated agreements.
It is our duty to inform you, on the basis of information provided to us, of the characteristics, the
essential terms and the reasons justifying the interest for the company of the agreements of which we
have been advised or which we have discovered during our engagement, without commenting on their
usefulness and appropriateness or identifying such other agreements as may exist. It is your
responsibility, pursuant to Article R. 225-31 of the French commercial code, to assess the interest in
concluding these agreements with a view to their approval.
Furthermore, it is our responsibility, where appropriate, to provide you with the information provided
for in
Article R. 225-31 of the French Commercial Code relating to the performance, during the past financial
year, of agreements already approved by the General Meeting of shareholders.
We applied the procedures that we considered necessary in the light of the professional guidelines of
the National Institute of Statutory Auditors relating to this engagement. This consisted in verifying the
consistency of the information provided to us with the source documents from which it is derived.
1
AGREEMENTS SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE GENERAL MEETING
Agreements authorized and entered into during the past financial year
1-1
Pursuant to Article L. 225-40 of the French Commercial Code, we were advised of the following
agreements entered into during the past financial year which were previously authorized by the board
of directors.
1-1-1 Indemnification agreement of Mr. John KOZARICH
Person concerned: Mr. John KOZARICH, board member of POXEL S.A.
Subject: agreement entered into on June 25th, 2021 with Mr. John KOZARICH to compensate him for
judicial costs and convictions that may arise in case of invoking his responsibility in his capacity as a
board member of the Company.
Page 331
Reason: this convention was put in place in the framework of the appointment of Mr. John KOZARICH
as a board member. The aim of the agreement is to provide a guarantee in consideration for the duties
performed.
2
AGREEMENTS ALREADY APPROVED BY THE GENERAL MEETING
2-1
Agreements approved during prior fiscal years and whose performance has continued during
the past financial year
Pursuant to Article R. 225-30 of the French Commercial Code, we have been informed that the
performance of the following agreements, already approved by the General Meeting in previous years,
continued during the year just ended.
2-1-1 Services agreement with COSMO PUBLIC RELATIONS CORPORATIONS, a company chaired
and managed by Ms. Kumi SATO
With: COSMO PUBLIC RELATIONS CORPORATIONS
Person concerned: Ms. Kumi SATO, board member of POXEL S.A. and CEO of COSMO PUBLIC
RELATIONS CORPORATIONS
Subject: agreement entered into on June 1st, 2018 pursuant to which COSMO PUBLIC RELATIONS
CORPORATIONS undertakes to provide the Company with communication services. Under this
contract, a sum of €20,977.86 gross is included in the expenses for the financial year.
2-2
Agreements approved during previous years with no continuing effect during the year
In addition, we have been informed of the following agreements, previously approved by
Shareholders’ Meetings of prior years, which had no effect during the year.
2-2-1 Indemnification agreement of Ms. Kumi SATO
Person concerned: Ms Kumi SATO, board member of POXEL S.A.
Subject: agreement entered into on August 1st, 2017 with Ms. Kumi SATO to compensate her for
judicial costs and convictions that may arise in case of invoking her responsibility in her capacity as a
board member of the Company.
2-2-2 Indemnification agreement of Ms. Pascale BOISSEL
Person concerned: Ms. Pascale BOISSEL, board member of POXEL S.A.
Subject: agreement entered into on March 16th, 2016 with Ms. Pascale BOISSEL to compensate her
for judicial costs and convictions that may arise in case of invoking her responsibility in the framework
of her mandate as a board member of the Company.
2-2-3 Indemnification agreement of Mr. Pierre LEGAULT
Person concerned: Mr. Pierre LEGAULT, Chairman of the board of POXEL S.A.
Page 332
Subject: agreement entered into on March 31st, 2016 with Mr. Pierre LEGAULT to compensate him for
judicial costs and convictions that may arise in case of invoking his responsibility in his capacity as a
board member of the Company.
2-2-4 Indemnification agreement of Ms. Janice BOURQUE
Person concerned: Ms. Janice BOURQUE, board member of POXEL S.A.
Subject: agreement entered into on March 31st, 2016 with Ms. Janice BOURQUE to compensate her
for judicial costs and convictions that may arise in case of invoking her responsibility in her capacity as
a board member of the Company.
2-2-5 Indemnification agreement of Mr. Richard KENDER
Person concerned: Mr. Richard KENDER, board member of POXEL S.A.
Subject: agreement entered into on December 12th, 2014 with Mr. Richard KENDER to compensate
him for judicial costs and convictions that may arise in case of invoking his responsibility in his capacity
as a board member of the Company.
2-2-6 Indemnification agreement of Mr Mohammed KHOSO BALUCH
Person concerned: Mr. Mohammed KHOSO BALUCH, board member of POXEL S.A.
Subject: agreement entered into on December 12th, 2014 with Mr. Mohammed KHOSO BALUCH to
compensate him for judicial costs and convictions that may arise in case of invoking his responsibility
in the framework of his mandate as a board member of the Company.
2-2-7 Management contract with Mr. Thomas KUHN
Person concerned: Mr. Thomas KUHN, Chief Executive Officer of POXEL S.A.
Subject: management contract with Mr. Thomas KUHN signed on June 20th, 2019 presenting an
assignment of management of the company with the limitations of powers applicable to him and for a
period equivalent to that of his corporate mandate as CEO. This contract also provides for the methods
used to set his gross earnings and termination benefits related to forced departure without cause and
a non-competition clause as set out below :
-
-
A compensation equal to one year of his fixed compensation at the date of termination,
If not yet paid, the earned variable compensation of the calendar year preceding the one
during which the termination occurs,
-
The earned variable compensation of the calendar year during which the termination occurs,
in proportion of his effective presence,
Page 333
-
-
An amount equal to 100% of the variable compensation for the year during which the
termination occurs, based on his fixed compensation at the date of termination,
A non-competition clause with a monthly compensation, for 18 months, of 50% of the average
gross remuneration he received over the course of the 12 months preceding the termination.
Paris and Paris-La-Défense, May 3rd, 2022
The Statutory Auditors
French original signed by
Becouze
Deloitte & Associés
Fabien BROVEDANI
Julien RAZUNGLES
Page 334
4.5
Legal information
4.5.1 Statutory auditors
4.5.1.1 Statutory auditors
DELOITTE & ASSOCIES, member of the regional institute of statutory auditors of Nanterre, 6 Place de
la Pyramide, 92908 Paris La Défense, represented by Julien Razungles
Appointment date: June 24, 2020
Term: Six years
Term expiration date: during the General Meeting of Shareholders to approve the financial
statements for the financial year ended December 31, 2025
BECOUZE, member of the regional institute of statutory auditors (compagnie régionale des
commissaires aux comptes) of Ouest Atlantique, 34 Rue de Liège, 75008 Paris represented by Fabien
Brovedani
Appointment date: June 23,2021
Term: Six years
Term expiration date: during the General Meeting of Shareholders to approve the financial
statements for the financial year ended December 31, 2026
4.5.1.2 Alternate statutory auditors
In accordance with the provisions of Article L. 823-1 of the French Commercial Code, no alternate
statutory auditor has been appointed for DELOITTE & ASSOCIES and BECOUZE.
4.5.1.3 Information on auditors who have resigned, have been removed or have not been renewed
In accordance with the Company’s audit committee charter and the principles applicable under the
MiddleNext Code of Corporate Governance, the audit committee of the Company, acknowledging that
the mandate of MAZARS SA, member of the regional institute of statutory auditors of Versailles, Tour
Exaltis – 61 rue Henri Regnault, 92400 Courbevoie, represented by Séverine HERVET was expiring on
the date of General Meeting of Shareholders convened to approve the financial statements for the
financial year ended December 31, 2020, decided, in agreement with the Company’s management, to
conduct a request for proposal in connection with the potential renewal of MAZARS SA or the
appointment of new statutory auditors.
The audit committee has exercised all responsibilities devoted to it in the course of this request for
proposal process. Three firms were contacted, and three answers were received. The request for
proposal included several criteria meant to allow the audit committee to evaluate the proposals
received in a fair manner. The fees of the statutory auditors as well as all relevant information were
assessed by the audit committee. The audit committee conducted interview of the firms and after
careful review of the proposals, recommended to the Board of Directors to select one of these
candidates. The Company considers that the selection process was fair and efficient.
Further to the proposal of the Board of Directors, based on the recommendation of the audit
committee, the shareholders of the Company have decided not to renew the mandate of MAZARS SA,
member of the regional institute of statutory auditors of Versailles, Tour Exaltis – 61 rue Henri
Regnault, 92400 Courbevoie, represented by Séverine HERVET which was expiring during the General
Meeting of Shareholders convened to approve the financial statements for the financial year ended
December 31, 2020.
As a consequence, the mandate of M. Emmanuel CHARNAVEL, member of the regional institute of
statutory auditors of Lyon, Le Premium, 131 Boulevard Stalingrad, 69624 Villeurbanne Cedex, alternate
for MAZARS SA, which was also expiring on such date was not renewed. In accordance with the
provisions of Article L. 823-1 of the French Commercial Code, no alternate statutory auditor has been
appointed for DELOITTE & ASSOCIES and BECOUZE.
Page 335
4.5.2 Share capital
4.5.2.1 Amount of share capital
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document, the share capital amounted to €579,041.00
divided into 28,952,050 fully paid-up shares with a nominal value of €0.02 each.
4.5.2.2 Non-equity securities
None
4.5.2.3 Number,book value and nominal value of the shares held by the Company or for the
Company
The Company's General Meeting of Shareholders of June 23, 2021 authorized in its 16th resolution the
Board of Directors, for a period of eighteen months from the date of the Meeting, to implement a
share buyback program within the framework of the provisions of Article L. 22-10-62 of the French
Commercial Code and in accordance with the general regulation of the AMF under the conditions
described below:
Maximum number of shares that may be purchased: 10% of the total number of shares constituting
its share capital at the date of the repurchase of the shares. When the shares are acquired for the
purpose of promoting the trading and the liquidity of the shares, the number of shares taken into
account for the calculation of the limit of 10% provided above corresponds to the number of shares
purchased, after deduction of the number of shares resold during the duration of the authorization.
Objectives of the buyback of shares:
the market making and liquidity of the Company's shares through a financial services provider
acting independently pursuant to a liquidity agreement in accordance with an ethics code
recognized by the AMF; and/or
the performance of obligations related to stock option, performance share and employee
savings plans or other share allocations to employees and officers of the Company or its
affiliates; and/or
the delivery of shares upon the exercise of rights attached to securities giving access to share
capital; and/or
the cancellation of all or part of the shares thus repurchased; and/or
the implementation of any operation compliant with applicable law; and/or
more generally, the pursuit of any purpose that may be authorized by law or any market
practice that may be accepted by market authorities, it being specified that, in such a case, the
Company would inform its shareholders by means of a press release.
The maximum purchase price: €20 (excluding acquisition costs), subject to adjustments intended to
take into account the impact of new transactions involving the Company’s capital, including a change
of the nominal value of the share, capital increase by capitalization of reserves, the allocation of
performance shares, stock split or consolidation, distribution of reserves or any other assets,
amortization of capital, or any other operation involving equity.
Maximum amount of funds that can be assigned to buyback: €10,000,000
It is stated that the number of shares acquired by the Company in view of their holding and subsequent
surrender in payment or in exchange in connection with a merger, de-merger or may not exceed 5%
of its capital.
The shares thus bought may be canceled.
It is specified that the establishing of the share repurchase program and its implementation will be the
subject of communications in accordance with the legal and regulatory provisions.
Page 336
Moreover, on the basis of the resolution at the General Meeting of Shareholders of April 15, 2014, the
Company signed a liquidity agreement on March 16, 2015 with Oddo BHF SCA. An amount of €250,000
was initially allocated to this liquidity agreement.
As of December 31, 2021, 38,199 shares were included in the liquidity account for a remaining cash
balance of €123,585.
4.5.2.4 Convertible or exchangeable securities or securities accompanied by warrants
At the date of this Universal Registration Document, the securities giving access to capital are the
following:
Page 337
4.5.2.4.1 Stock subscription warrant plan
Page 338
(1)
(2)
(3)
Each 10.31.2012 warrant entitles the holder to subscribe in cash for twenty (20) new shares at a price of €4.00 each.
Each 07.25.2014 warrant entitles the holder to subscribe in cash for one (1) new ordinary share at a price of €4.00 each.
The 06.16.2015 warrants were issued on the condition precedent of voting by the General Meeting of Shareholders of June 16, 2015 on a delegation of authority in
favor of the Board of Directors. This delegation of authority was given by the General Meeting of Shareholders in its 18th resolution.
The attribution of warrants to the Chairman and the Directors is further described in Section 4.2.5 “Warrants, Founder Warrants, Stock Options and Performance Shares
granted to the corporate officers” of this Universal Registration Document . The attribution of warrants to independent directors does not undermine their independent
character.
(4)
(5)
(6)
The subscription price and the exercise price of the warrants were determined after valuation by an independent expert and were reflecting the fair market value of
such instruments according to such independent expert.
The 11.06.2019, the 03.20.2020 and the 06.30.2021 warrants were subscribed to upon subscription of the bonds to which they were attached (OBSA) (at an EUR 1
subscription price).
(7)
(8)
The 05.22.2020 warrants were subscribed to upon subscription of the shares to which they were attached (at an EUR 7.50 subscription price).
Each 11.06.2019, each 03.20.2020 and each 06.30.2021 warrant entitles the holder to subscribe in cash for one (1) new ordinary share at a price which is the lower of
(i) respectively (x) €7.37, (y) €7.14 and €6.72 and (ii) the subscription price of any share falling within the scope of any share issuance of a market value of more than
EUR 10 million (in one or several issuances occurring within a period of 12 consecutive months, it being specified that in the event of several issuances, the subscription
price shall be the average subscription price of these issuances) made by the Company (between November 7, 2019 and December 31, 2022), it being specified that this
subscription price is subject to a EUR 6.37 floor.
(9)
By virtue of the delegation voted by the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 23, 2021 under its 28tth and 30th resolutions, the maximum nominal amount of
capital increases that may be carried out immediately or in the future pursuant to the delegation of authority relating to the warrants may not exceed (i) 6% of the
share capital on a fully diluted basis recognized at the date of the decision to award the warrants, and (ii) with the securities that may be issued through the exercise of
stock options and performance shares that may be granted, 7,5% of the share capital on a fully diluted basis recognized at the date of the decision to award the
warrants; it being specified that the maximum amount referred to above will be increased by the securities issued to protect the rights of holders of securities giving
access to capital pursuant to the provisions of the French Commercial Code.
(10) All warrants have been fully subscribed except for the 01.24.2019, the 02.14.2020, the 01.27.2021 and the 01.27.2022 warrants which have a subscription period of 10
years from the grant date.
(11) The 01.27.2021 warrants, were subject to performance conditions assessed by the Board of Directors according to a one-year plan. Such performance conditions were
100% achieved and each warrant shall therefore give right to a number of shares calculated pursuant to an adjusted ratio. The amount presented in the table above
represents the total maximum number of shares which could be issued upon full exercise of the 01.27.2021 warrants based on this adjusted ratio.
Page 339
(12) The 01.27.2022 warrants, are subject to performance conditions assessed by the Board of Directors according to a one-year plan. In case of achievement of such
performance conditions, each warrant shall give right to a number of shares calculated pursuant to an adjusted ratio. The amount presented in the table above
represents the potential total maximum number of shares which could be issued upon full exercise of the 01.27.2022 warrants based on this adjusted ratio.
Page 340
4.5.2.4.2 Founder warrant (BSPCE) plan
BSPCE 2017
2017-02
BSPCE 2012 (1)
2017-01
2017-03
Date of General Meeting of Shareholders
Date of attribution by the Board of Directors
10/31/2012
03/12/2014
5,000
06/30/2017
06/30/2017
177,500
03/31/2017
100,000 (2)
3/31/2018
09/21/2017
15,000
Total amount of attributed founders’ warrants
(2)
Effective date of exercise of BSPCE
BSPCE expiration date
03/12/2014
6/30/2018
21/09/2018
10/31/2022
3/31/2027
6/30/2027
21/09/2027
BSPCE exercise price
€64
70,000
0
€5.91
€7.26
1,666
€6.01
Number of shares subscribed
Total number of BSPCE canceled or voided
Total amount of exercised BSPCE
Total amount of remaining BSPCE
0
0
0
0
50,000
1,666
0
0
3,500
1,500
100,000
125,834
15,000
Maximum number of shares that can be
subscribed (3)
30,000
100,000
125,834
15,000
(1)
(2)
Each BSPCE 10.31.2012 entitles the holder to subscribe for twenty (20) ordinary shares at the price of €3.20
per share.
The attribution of BSPCE to the Chief Executive Officer is further described in Section 4.2.5 “Warrants,
Founder Warrants, Stock Options and Performance Shares granted to the corporate officers” of this
Universal Registration Document.
(3)
The 03.31.2017 BSPCE were issued on the condition precedent of voting by the General Meeting of
Shareholders of June 30, 2017 on a delegation of authority in favor of the Board of Directors. This
delegation of authority was given by the General Meeting of Shareholders in its 32d resolution.
Page 341
4.5.2.4.3 Stock option plan
Page 342
(1)
(2)
(3)
The grant of Stock Options to the Chairman is further described in Section 4.2.5 “Warrants, Founder Warrants, Stock Options and Performance Shares granted to the
corporate officers” of this Universal Registration Document.
The Stock Options granted to the Chairman on January 27, 2021, were subject to performance conditions assessed by the Board of Directors according to a one-year
plan. Such performance conditions have been 100% achieved.
By virtue of the delegation voted by the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 23, 2021 under its 27th and 30th resolutions, the maximum nominal amount of capital
increases that may be carried out immediately or in the future pursuant to the delegation of authority relating to the stock options may not exceed (i) 6% of the share
capital on a fully diluted basis recognized at the date of the decision to award the stock options , and (ii) with the securities that may be issued through the exercise of
warrants and performance shares that may be granted, 7,5% of the share capital on a fully diluted basis recognized at the date of the decision to award the stock
options; it being specified that the maximum amount referred to above will be increased by the securities issued to protect the rights of holders of securities giving
access to capital pursuant to the provisions of the French Commercial Code.
(4)
The Stock Options granted to the Chairman on January 27, 2022, are subject to performance conditions assessed by the Board of Directors according to a one-year plan
and the grant is subject to the approval of the shareholders at the 2022 General Assembly Meeting pursuant to article L. 22-10-34 of the French Commercial Code.
Page 343
4.5.2.4.4 Performance share plan
June 23, 2021
performance share
allocation
May 9, 2019
performance share
allocation
June 24, 2020
performance share
allocation
06/23/2021
Date of General Meeting of Shareholders
09/05/2019
06/24/2020
Date of attribution by the Board of 6/20/201 9/25/201
01/27/2021
(3)
01/27/2022
(6)
Directors
9 (1)
9 (2)
672,550
Total number of performance shares
attributed (4)
3,600
65,000
603,250
0
0
0
Number of acquired shares
1,604
794
33,334
0
0
Total number of shares canceled or voided
34,350
Number of shares for which the acquisition
and holding period have ended
0
0
0
Potential shares at the time of writing this
report (5)
669,350
1,202
31,666
569,900
(1)
(2)
The performance shares allocated on June 20, 2019, are subject to the condition of presence of
beneficiaries on the vesting date and to performance conditions assessed by the Board of Directors
according to a three-year plan.
The first and second third of the performance shares allocated on June 20, 2019, for which the performance
conditions will be assessed by the Board of Directors at its first meeting in 2021, are subject to a two-years
acquisition period and will be subject to an additional one-year holding period. The final third of the
performance shares allocated on June 20, 2019, for which the performance conditions will be assessed by
the Board of Directors at its first meeting in 2022, are subject to a three-years acquisition period will not
be subject to an additional holding period.
The performance shares allocated on September 25, 2019, are subject to the condition of presence of
beneficiary on the vesting date and/or to performance conditions assessed by the Board of Directors.
20,000 performance shares allocated on September 25, 2019 are subject to the condition of presence of
the beneficiary only, out of which two-third are subject to a two-years acquisition period and will be subject
to an additional one-year holding period and one-third are subject to a two-years acquisition period and
will not be subject to an additional holding period.
20,000 performance shares allocated on September 25, 2019, are subject to the condition of presence of
beneficiary on the acquisition date and to performance conditions to be assessed by the Board of Directors
at its first meeting after the second anniversary date of their allocation. Such performance shares are
subject to a two-years acquisition period and will be subject to an additional one-year holding period.
25,000 performance shares allocated on September 25, 2019, are subject to the condition of presence of
beneficiary on the acquisition date and to performance conditions to be assessed by the Board of Directors
at any time between their allocation date and December 31, 2023. Such performance shares are subject
to a two-years acquisition period and will be subject to an additional one-year holding period.
The performance shares allocated on January 27, 2021, are subject to the condition of presence of
beneficiary on the acquisition date which will be two years after their date of grant and to performance
conditions assessed by the Board of Directors according to a one-year plan. Such performance shares are
subject to an additional one-year holding period after their acquisition.
The attribution of performance shares to the Chief Executive Officer is further described in Section 4.2.5
“Warrants, Founder Warrants, Stock Options and Performance” of this Universal Registration Document
and is subject to the approval of the shareholders at the 2022 General Assembly Meeting pursuant to
article L. 22-10-34 of the French Commercial Code.
By virtue of the delegation voted by the General Meeting of Shareholders on June 23, 2021 under its 29th
and 30th resolutions, the maximum nominal amount of capital increases that may be carried out
immediately or in the future pursuant to the delegation of authority relating to the performance shares
may not exceed (i) 4.5% of the share capital on a fully diluted basis recognized at the date of the decision
to award the performance shares, and (ii) with the securities that may be issued through the exercise of
(3)
(4)
(5)
Page 344
warrants and stock options that may be granted, 7,5% of the share capital on a fully diluted basis
recognized at the date of the decision to award the performance shares.
The performance shares allocated on January 27, 2022, are subject to the condition of presence of
beneficiary on the acquisition date which will be two years after their date of grant and to performance
conditions assessed by the Board of Directors according to a one-year plan. Such performance shares are
subject to an additional one-year holding period after their acquisition.
(6)
4.5.2.4.5 Summary of dilutive instruments
The table below presents the summary of dilutive instruments as of the date of this Universal
Registration Document:
Warrants
BSPCE
SO
PS
Total number of attributed
warrants/BSPCE/SO/PA
outstanding
32,765,664
242,334
1,805,000
1,264,318
Total number of shares that
may be subscribed or bought
based on the remaining
warrants/BSPCE/SO/PA
3,504,665
270,834 (1)
1,805,000
1,264,318
(1)
After taking into consideration the conversion ratio of 20 shares for 1 BSPCE decided by the Company’s
Board of Directors on March 28, 2014
The total dilution that may arise as a result of the exercise of all of the financial instruments conferring
access to the share capital or the exercise of all the warrants, BSPCE, stock options and performance
shares entitling access to 6,844,917 of the Company’s shares corresponds to a potential dilution of
19,25% on a fully diluted basis, or a total of 35,550,967shares.
Page 345
4.5.2.5 Acquisition rights and/or obligations attached to the capital issued but not paid-in and
capital increase commitment
The following table summarizes the delegations in the course of validity granted by the General
Meeting of Shareholders in the area of capital increases and the use of these delegations in the last
year.
DATE OF THE
CEILING (IN NOMINAL
VALUE WHEN IT IS
GENERAL
MEETING OF
SHAREHOLDERS
DURATION OF
VALIDITY
DATE AND TERMS OF USE BY THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
SUBJECT OF THE DELEGATION
EXPRESSED IN EUROS)
JUNE 23, 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO BE GIVEN TO THE
BOARD WITH A VIEW TO THE PURCHASE BY
COMPANY OF ITS OWN SHARES
18 MONTHS
10% OF THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF SHARES
MAKING UP THE SHARE
CAPITAL ON THE DATE OF
THE REPURCHASE BY THE
COMPANY
N/A
(15TH RESOLUTION)
JUNE 23, 2021
JUNE 23, 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS TO REDUCE SHARE CAPITAL BY
CANCELING TREASURY SHARES
18 MONTHS
26 MONTHS
10% OF THE TOTAL
NUMBER OF SHARES
MAKING UP THE SHARE
CAPITAL PER 24-MONTH
PERIOD.
N/A
N/A
(16TH RESOLUTION)
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO CARRY OUT A
CAPITAL INCREASE BY ISSUING SHARES,
EQUITY SECURITIES CONFERRING ACCESS
TO OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES OR
CONFERRING THE RIGHT TO AN
ALLOTMENT OF DEBT SECURITIES AND/OR
SECURITIES CONFERRING ACCESS TO
EQUITY SECURITIES, WITH PREFERENTIAL
SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS
CAPITAL INCREASE:
€228,000 1,
AND
DEBT INSTRUMENTS
GIVING ACCESS TO
EQUITY SECURITIES:
(17TH RESOLUTION)
€100,000,0002
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO CARRY OUT A
CAPITAL INCREASE BY ISSUING SHARES,
EQUITY SECURITIES CONFERRING ACCESS
TO OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES OR
CONFERRING THE RIGHT TO AN
ALLOTMENT OF DEBT SECURITIES AND/OR
SECURITIES CONFERRING ACCESS TO
JUNE 23, 2021
26 MONTHS
CAPITAL INCREASE:
€228,000 1,
AND
N/A
DEBT INSTRUMENTS
GIVING ACCESS TO
EQUITY SECURITIES:
EQUITY
SECURITIES,
WITHOUT
PREFERENTIAL SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS, BY A
PUBLIC OFFERING AND THE OPTION TO
€100,000,0002
GRANT
PRIORITY
RIGHTS
TO
SHAREHOLDERS
(18TH RESOLUTION)3
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO CARRY OUT A
CAPITAL INCREASE BY ISSUING SHARES,
EQUITY SECURITIES CONFERRING ACCESS
TO OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES OR
CONFERRING THE RIGHT TO AN
ALLOTMENT OF DEBT SECURITIES AND/OR
SECURITIES CONFERRING ACCESS TO
JUNE 30, 2021: ISSUANCE OF
13,500,000 WARRANTS (ATTACHED TO
BONDS (OBSA)) GIVING RIGHT TO THE
SUBSCRIPTION OF 156,250 SHARES OF
THE COMPANY
JUNE 23, 2021
18 MONTHS
CAPITAL INCREASE:
€314,000 1,
AND
EQUITY
SECURITIES,
WITHOUT
PREFERENTIAL SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS IN
Page 346
FAVOR OF
A
SPECIFIC CATEGORY OF
DEBT INSTRUMENTS
GIVING ACCESS TO
EQUITY SECURITIES:
PERSONS (DEFINED AS:
(1) NATURAL PERSONS OR FRENCH OR
FOREIGN LEGAL ENTITIES, INCLUDING
COMPANIES, TRUSTS, INVESTMENT FUNDS
OR OTHER INVESTMENT VEHICLES,
IRRESPECTIVE OF THEIR LEGAL FORM,
€100,000,0002
INVESTING ON
A USUAL BASIS IN THE
PHARMACEUTICAL SECTOR, AND/OR
(2) ONE OR MORE STRATEGIC PARTNERS
OF THE COMPANY, LOCATED IN FRANCE OR
ABROAD, HAVING CONCLUDED OR ABOUT
TO
CONCLUDE
ONE
OR
AGREEMENTS
CO-DEVELOPMENT,
MORE
PARTNERSHIP
(DEVELOPMENT,
DISTRIBUTION, MANUFACTURING, ETC.)
OR TRADE AGREEMENTS WITH THE
COMPANY (OR
THE COMPANIES THEY CONTROL, THAT
CONTROL THEM OR THAT ARE
A SUBSIDIARY) AND/OR
CONTROLLED BY THE SAME PERSON OR
THE SAME PERSONS, DIRECTLY OR
INDIRECTLY, WITHIN THE MEANING OF
ARTICLE L. 233-3 OF THE FRENCH
COMMERCIAL CODE; AND/OR
(3) ALL FRENCH OR FOREIGN INVESTMENT
SERVICES PROVIDERS, OR ANY FOREIGN
INSTITUTIONS WITH AN EQUIVALENT
LEGAL
STATUS,
SUSCEPTIBLE
TO
GUARANTEE THE COMPLETION OF AN
ISSUANCE TO BE PLACED TO THE PERSONS
MENTIONED IN (1) AND (2), AND IN THIS
CONTEXT TO UNDERWRITE THE ISSUED
SECURITIES
(19TH RESOLUTION)4
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO CARRY OUT A
CAPITAL INCREASE, WITHIN THE LIMIT OF
20% OF THE SHARE CAPITAL PER YEAR, BY
ISSUING SHARES, EQUITY SECURITIES
CONFERRING ACCESS TO OTHER EQUITY
SECURITIES OR CONFERRING THE RIGHT TO
AN ALLOTMENT OF DEBT SECURITIES
AND/OR SECURITIES CONFERRING ACCESS
TO EQUITY SECURITIES, WITHOUT
PREFERENTIAL SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS, BY
AN OFFER TO QUALIFIED INVESTORS OR A
RESTRICTED GROUP OF INVESTORS,
WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE L. 411-
2, OF THE FRENCH MONETARY AND
FINANCIAL CODE
JUNE 23, 2021
26 MONTHS
CAPITAL INCREASE:
€171,000 1
AND
N/A
DEBT INSTRUMENTS
GIVING ACCESS TO
EQUITY SECURITIES:
€100,000,0002
IN THE LIMIT OF 20% OF
THE SHARE CAPITAL PER
YEAR, VALUED AT THE
DATE OF THE DECISION
OF THE BOARD MAKING
USE OF THE DELEGATION
(20TH RESOLUTION)3
JUNE 23, 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO BE GRANTED TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN ACCORDANCE
WITH ARTICLES L.22-10-52 PARAGRAPH
2, AND R. 22-10-32OF THE FRENCH
COMMERCIAL CODE TO SET THE ISSUE
PRICE OF THE SHARES, EQUITY SECURITIES
CONFERRING ACCESS TO OTHER EQUITY
SECURITIES OR CONFERRING THE RIGHT TO
26 MONTHS
10% OF THE CAPITAL PER
YEAR DETERMINED ON
THE DAY OF THE
N/A
DECISION OF THE BOARD
MAKING USE OF THE
DELEGATION
Page 347
AN ALLOTMENT OF DEBT SECURITIES
AND/OR SECURITIES CONFERRING ACCESS
TO EQUITY SECURITIES, WITHOUT
PREFERENTIAL SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS,
UNDER THE DELEGATIONS OF AUTHORITY
TH
THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THE 18 AND
20TH RESOLUTIONS
(21ST RESOLUTION)5
JUNE 23, 2021
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO INCREASE THE
NUMBER OF SHARES TO BE ISSUED IN THE
EVENT OF A CAPITAL INCREASE WITH OR
WITHOUT PREFERENTIAL SUBSCRIPTION
RIGHTS
26 MONTHS
15% OF THE INITIAL
N/A
ISSUE1
(22ND RESOLUTION)
JUNE 23, 2021
JUNE 23, 2021
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO INCREASE
CAPITAL BY CAPITALIZING PREMIUMS,
RESERVES, PROFITS OR OTHER ITEMS
26 MONTHS
€171,0001
N/A
N/A
(23RD RESOLUTION)
DELEGATION GRANTED TO THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS TO ISSUE SHARES AND
26 MONTHS
CAPITAL INCREASE:
SECURITIES
ENTAILING
A
CAPITAL
10% OF THE CAPITAL OF
THE COMPANY EXISTING
AT THE DATE OF THE
TRANSACTION 1,
INCREASE IN CONSIDERATION OF IN-KIND
CONTRIBUTIONS
(24TH RESOLUTION)
AND
DEBT INSTRUMENTS
GIVING ACCESS TO
EQUITY SECURITIES:
€18,000,000 2
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO ISSUE SHARES
JUNE 23, 2021
26 MONTHS
CAPITAL INCREASE:
€114,0001
AND
N/A
AND SECURITIES ENTAILING
A
CAPITAL
INCREASE IN THE EVENT OF
A
PUBLIC
EXCHANGE OFFER INITIATED BY THE
COMPANY
DEBT INSTRUMENTS
GIVING ACCESS TO
EQUITY SECURITIES:
(25TH RESOLUTION)
€100,000,0002
JUNE 23, 2021
FIXING THE OVERALL LIMITATIONS OF THE
AMOUNT OF ISSUES CARRIED OUT UNDER
THE DELEGATIONS CONFERRED
--
CAPITAL INCREASE:
€314,000
AND
N/A
(26TH RESOLUTION)
Page 348
DEBT INSTRUMENTS
GIVING ACCESS TO
EQUITY SECURITIES:
€100,000,000
JUNE 23 2021
AUTHORIZATION TO THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS TO GRANT SHARE
SUBSCRIPTION AND/OR PURCHASE STOCK
OPTIONS (“OPTIONS”), WITHOUT
PREFERENTIAL SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS IN
FAVOR OF SPECIFIC CATEGORY OF
PERSONS (DEFINED AS:
38 MONTHS
6.0% OF CAPITAL ON A
FULLY DILUTED BASIS,
RECOGNIZED ON THE
DATE OF THE DECISION
OF THE ALLOTMENT8
JANUARY 27, 2022: ISSUANCE OF
390,000 OPTIONS, GIVING RIGHT TO
THE SUBSCRIPTION OF 390,000 SHARES
OF THE COMPANY
A
EMPLOYEES
AND/OR
CORPORATE
OFFICERS (OR SOME OF THEM) OF THE
COMPANY OR COMPANIES OR GROUPINGS
AFFILIATED WITH IT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE CONDITIONS SET OUT IN ARTICLE L.
225-180 OF THE FRENCH COMMERCIAL
CODE.
(27TH RESOLUTION)6
JUNE 23, 2021
DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY TO THE
BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO ISSUE AND
ALLOT ORDINARY SHARE WARRANTS
(“WARRANTS”), WITHOUT PREFERENTIAL
18 MONTHS
6.0% OF CAPITAL ON A
FULLY DILUTED BASIS,
RECOGNIZED ON THE
DATE OF THE DECISION
OF THE ALLOTMENT8
JANUARY 27, 2022: ISSUANCE OF
91,896 01.27.2021 WARRANTS,
GIVING RIGHT TO THE SUBSCRIPTION OF
POTENTIALLY 120,000 SHARES OF THE
COMPANY9
SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS IN FAVOR OF
A
SPECIFIC CATEGORY OF PERSONS (DEFINED
AS:
(I) ANY INDIVIDUAL OR LEGAL ENTITY WHO
IS AN INDUSTRIAL OR COMMERCIAL
STRATEGIC PARTNER OF THE COMPANY, IN
THE PHARMACEUTICAL SECTOR, OR
PERSONS WHO HAVE ENTERED INTO
A
SERVICE OR CONSULTING AGREEMENT
WITH THE COMPANY OR ANY OF ITS
SUBSIDIARIES;
(II)
SHAREHOLDERS,
EXECUTIVES
SENIOR
OR
MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYEES OF SUCH ENTITIES IN THE CASE
OF LEGAL ENTITIES;
(III)
THE
SENIOR
MANAGEMENT
EXECUTIVES, CORPORATE OFFICERS OR
EMPLOYEES OF THE COMPANY OR ITS
SUBSIDIARIES)
(28TH RESOLUTION)7
AUTHORIZATION TO THE BOARD OF
DIRECTORS TO ALLOT PERFORMANCE
4.5% OF CAPITAL ON A
FULLY DILUTED BASIS,
RECOGNIZED ON THE
DATE OF THE DECISION
OF THE ALLOTMENT8
JANUARY 27, 2022: ISSUANCE OF
672,550 PERFORMANCE SHARES OF THE
COMPANY.
JUNE 23, 2021
38 MONTHS
SHARES
(“PERFORMANCE
SHARE
ALLOCATION”), WHETHER EXISTING OR TO
BE ISSUED, WITHOUT PREFERENTIAL
SUBSCRIPTION RIGHTS IN FAVOR OF
A
SPECIFIC CATEGORY OF PERSONS (DEFINED
AS:
EMPLOYEES, OR CERTAIN CATEGORIES OF
THEM, OF THE COMPANY AND/OR
ENTITIES DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY
AFFILIATED WITH IT WITHIN THE MEANING
OF ARTICLE L. 225-197-2 OF THE
Page 349
FRENCH COMMERCIAL CODE, AS WELL AS
CORPORATE
OFFICERS
OF
THE
AFOREMENTIONED
COMPANIES
OR
ENTITIES, AS DETERMINED BY THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE L. 225-197-1 ET
SEQ. OF THE FRENCH COMMERCIAL CODE,
OR SOME OF THEM, AND WHO, IN
ADDITION, MEET THE CONDITIONS AND, IF
APPLICABLE, THE ALLOTMENT CRITERIA
THAT WILL HAVE BEEN SET BY THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS)
(29TH RESOLUTION)
SETTING OF THE OVERALL LIMITS ON THE
AMOUNT OF THE ISSUES CARRIED OUT
PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATIONS TO
GRANT OPTIONS AND PERFORMANCE
SHARES AND THE DELEGATIONS OF
AUTHORITY TO ISSUE WARRANTS
7.5% OF SHARE CAPITAL
ON A FULLY DILUTED
BASIS RECOGNIZED ON
THE DATE OF THE
JUNE 23, 2021
-
N/A
DECISION OF THE
ALLOTMENT
(30TH RESOLUTION)
(1)
(2)
(3)
Total nominal amount of €314,000 of the capital increases that may be carried out pursuant to the 17th,
18th, 19th, 20th, 24th and 25th resolutions (see the 26th resolution).
Total nominal amount of €100,000,000 for debt securities that may be issued pursuant to the 17th, 18th,
19th, 20th, 24th and 25th resolutions (see the 26th resolution).
The issue price of the securities that may be issued pursuant to this delegation of authority shall be
determined by the Board of Directors in accordance with the following terms and conditions: the sum that
the Company receives or should receive for each share issued or created by subscription, conversion,
exchange, redemption, exercise of warrants or otherwise shall be at least equal to an amount determined
in accordance with the regulations applicable on the issue date (as of this date, the average, weighted by
the volumes of the share prices over the last three trading days prior to the beginning of the offer period,
less a possible discount of no more than 10%, in accordance with Article R.22-10-32 of the French
Commercial Code).
(4)
(5)
(6)
The issue price of the securities issued pursuant to this delegation of authority shall be set by the Board of
Directors using a multi-criteria method, provided the share subscription price is not less than 80% of the
weighted average of the share prices over the twenty (20) trading days preceding the date when the issue
price is set, and the issue price of securities conferring access to capital is such that the sum immediately
received by the Company at the time of this issue, plus, if applicable, any sum that it may subsequently
receive for each share issued as a result of the issue of such securities, is not less than 80% of the weighted
average of the share prices over the twenty (20) trading days preceding the date the issue price is set.
The issue price of the securities issued pursuant to this delegation of authority shall be set by the Board of
Directors using a multi-criteria method, provided the share subscription price is not less than 80% of the
weighted average of the share prices over the five (5) trading days preceding the date when the issue price
is set, and the issue price of securities conferring access to capital is such that the sum immediately
received by the Company at the time of this issue, plus, if applicable, any sum that it may subsequently
receive for each share issued as a result of the issue of such securities, is not less than 80% of the weighted
average of the share prices over the five (5) trading days preceding the date the issue price is set.
The subscription or purchase price of shares resulting from exercising the Options shall be determined by
the Board of Directors on the date that the Options are granted, as follows:
in the case of options to subscribe for new shares, the price shall not be less than the share price on the
last trading day prior to the date the Option is granted;
in the case of options to subscribe for existing shares, the price shall not be less than 95% of the average
price of the twenty (20) trading days prior to the date the Option is granted, or of the average purchase
price of the shares held by the Company in accordance with Article L. 22-10-62 of the French Commercial
Code.
Page 350
(7)
(8)
(9)
The subscription price of an ordinary share upon exercise of a Warrant will be determined by the Board of
Directors at the time of the award of the Warrants and the price shall not be less than the share price on
the last trading day prior to the date the warrant is awarded.
Maximal percentage of the existing share capital to be issued pursuant to the share capital increases that
may be carried out pursuant to the 27th to 30th resolutions is 7.5% of the capital on a fully diluted basis,
recognized on the date of the decision of the allotment (see the 30th resolution).
The 01.27.2022 warrants, are subject to performance conditions assessed by the Board of Directors
according to a one-year plan. In case of achievement of such performance conditions, each warrant shall
give right to a number of shares calculated pursuant to an adjusted ratio. The amount presented in the
table above represents the potential total maximum number of shares which could be issued upon full
exercise of the 01.27.2022 warrants based on this adjusted ratio.
4.5.2.6 Information relating to the share capital of Group companies which is the subject of a
conditional or unconditional agreement providing for it to be placed under option
As far as the Company is aware, there are no call options, put options or other commitments in favor
of the shareholders of the Company or made by them with regard to the Company’s shares
Page 351
4.5.2.7 Changes in share capital
4.5.2.7.1 Table showing changes in share capital over the last three financial years
Number of
shares
constituting the
Capital
movement in
Number of
shares
created
Transaction
Date
Nominal
value in €
Share capital
in €
Nature of operations
Premium in €
130,231,356
capital
As of December 31, 2018
Vesting of 24,150 performance
shares
517,137
2,729,399
25,856,827
0.02
517,137
January 2019
March 2019
October 2019 Exercise of 139,986 stock-options
483
676
2,800
521,095
500
0
83,824
944,006
24,150
33,800
139,986
197,936
200
25,880,977
25,914,777
26,054,763
26,054,763
26,064,763
26,066,429
517,620
518,296
521,095
521,095
521,295
521,328
Exercise of 1,690 BSPCE
As of December 31, 2019
Exercise of 500 BSPCE
Exercise of 1,666 BSPCE
131,259,186
24,800
0.02
January 2020
January 2020
33
12,062
1,666
Vesting of 26,611 performance
shares
Capital increase (with cancellation
of preferred subscription rights in
favor of a designated person)
January 2020
532
0
26,611
26,093,040
28,451,523
521,860
569,030
May 2020
47,169
17,641,453
2,358,483
June 2020
August 2020
Exercise of 1,000 BSPCE
Exercise of 1,200 BSPCE
As of December 31, 2020
Vesting of 115,731 performance
shares
400
480
569,910
49,600
76,230
149,063,331
20,000
24,000
2,430,960
28,471,523
28,495,523
28,495,523
569,430
569,910
569,910
0.02
0.02
January 2021
June 2021
June 2021
September
2021
2314.62
1,150
0
228,850
0
115,731
57,500
1,604
28,611,254
28,668,754
28,670,358
572,225
573,375
573,407
Exercise of 2,875 Warrants
Vesting of 1,604 performance shares
Vesting of 33,334 performance
shares
32.08
666,68
569,910
0
33,334
2,430,960
28,703,692
28,703,692
574,073
574,073
As of December 31, 2021
149,063,331
Page 352
4.5.2.7.2 Ownership of the Company’s shares over the last three financial years
SHAREHOLDERS
12/31/2019
5.78%
12/31/2020
5.31%
12/31/2021
5,36%
THOMAS KUHN
OTHER MANAGERS AND EMPLOYEES
BPIFRANCE TOTAL
4.86%
3.61%
3.84%
16.24%
19.19%
20,01%
ANDERA PARTNERS (FORMERLY EDMOND
DE ROTHSCHILD INVESTMENT PARTNERS)
15.98%
11.26%
(1)
ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD
DEUTERX
5.49%
4,95%
46.56%
0.15%
100%
5.02%
(1)
4.99%
(1)
PUBLIC
55.48%
0.13%
100%
65,66%
0.14%
100%
TREASURY SHARES
TOTAL
(1)
The Company does not have information relating to the exact ownership of capital and voting rights of
DeuteRX and Andera Partners at the date of this Universal Registration Document , as they own less than
5% of share capital or voting rights based on the shareholder disclosures received by the Company and the
AMF.
4.5.2.8 Items likely to have an impact in the event of a takeover bid
Items likely to have an impact in the event of a takeover bid are presented and explained in accordance
with the provisions of Article L. 22-10-11 of the French Commercial Code.
4.5.2.8.1 Structure of the Company’s capital
The structure of the Company’s capital is described in Section 4.5.2 “Share capital” of this Universal
Registration Document.
As far as the Company is aware, there are no other shareholders holding directly or indirectly, alone
or in concert more than 5% of the capital or voting rights at the date of this report.
4.5.2.8.2 Restrictions provided for in the bylaws on the exercise of voting rights and share
transfers or clauses brought to the Company’s attention pursuant to Article L. 233-
11 of the French Commercial Code.
Not applicable.
4.5.2.8.3 Direct or indirect shareholdings in the Company’s capital of which it is aware
pursuant to Articles L. 233-7 and L. 233-12 of the French Commercial Code
As of the date of this Universal Registration Document , no shareholder individually holds either control
of the Company, or a percentage likely to lead to the presumption of control of the Company within
the meaning of the provisions of Article L. 233-3 of the French Commercial Code.
4.5.2.8.4 List of the holders of any securities carrying special controlling rights and
description of such securities
The Company is not aware of the existence of special controlling rights.
Page 353
4.5.2.8.5 Control mechanisms provided for in any employee share ownership system, where
the controlling rights are not exercised by the employees
The Company has not set up any system of employee share ownership that may contain control
mechanisms where the controlling rights are not exercised by the employees.
4.5.2.8.6 Agreements between the shareholders of which the Company is aware and that
may result in restrictions on the transfer of shares and in the exercise of the voting
rights
Not applicable.
4.5.2.8.7 Rules applicable to the appointment and replacement of the members of the Board
of Directors and to amendment of the bylaws
The rules applicable in this respect are provided for in the bylaws and are in compliance with the law
and the regulations in force.
4.5.2.8.8 Powers of the Board of Directors, in particular the issuance or buyback of shares
Information about delegations of authority can be found in Section 4.5.2.5 “Acquisition rights and/or
obligations attached to the capital issued but not paid-in and capital increase commitment” of this
Universal Registration Document.
4.5.2.9 Agreements entered into by the Company that have been amended or end in the event of a
change in control of the Company
The Company entered into certain agreements, which involve stipulations relative to change of control
of the Company.
Some terms and conditions of the securities giving access to capital also contain stipulations regarding
an acceleration of the period of downtime in the event of a change of control of the Company (refer
to Section 4.5.2.4 “Convertible or exchangeable securities or securities accompanied by warrants” of
this Universal Registration Document ).
4.5.3 Certificate of incorporation of the Company and bylaws
4.5.3.1 Corporate purpose (article 2 of the Company’s bylaws)
The purpose of the Company, in France and any other country, is as follows:
Research and development of new therapeutic strategies for humans, contract manufacturing
and sale and marketing in all its forms of specialty pharmaceuticals previously tested in pre-
clinical and clinical studies, as well as all applied research and medical development activities,
filing and acquisition of all patents, trademarks and industrial property rights;
Consultation and conduct of market surveys and studies relating to pharmaceutical regulations
and pharmaceutical and clinical development;
Participation of the Company, by any means, directly or indirectly, in all operations which may
be related to its purpose through the incorporation of new companies, contribution,
subscription or purchase of shares or share rights, merger or otherwise, creation, acquisition,
rental, or management of a lease over any businesses or establishments; the taking,
acquisition, exploitation or transfer of all processes and patents related to such activities.
And generally, all industrial, commercial, financial or non-trading transactions, in personal or
real property, that may be directly or indirectly related to the corporate purpose or any similar
or related purpose.
Page 354
4.5.3.2 Provisions of the bylaws and other provisions relating to members of administrative and
management bodies
4.5.3.2.1 Board of Directors (Articles 12-14 of the Company’s bylaws)
Appointment of the members of the Board of Directors
The Company is managed by a Board of Directors composed of between 3 and 18 members, who may
be natural persons or legal entities, subject to the derogation provided for by law in case of a merger.
Any legal entity must, at the time of its appointment, appoint a natural person as its permanent
representative on the Board of Directors. The length of the term of office of the permanent
representative is the same as that of the legal entity director that it represents. When the legal entity
removes its permanent representative from office, it must immediately arrange to replace him/her.
The same provisions apply in the event of the death or resignation of the permanent representative.
No person over the age of 70 years shall be appointed as a Director. When directors cross this age limit
during their term of office, thus bringing the number of directors aged over 70 to more than one-third,
the oldest director shall be deemed to have automatically resigned.
Directors may or may not be shareholders of the Company.
During the life of the Company, Directors are appointed by a decision of the Ordinary General Meeting
of Shareholders. The term of office of Directors is three (3) years. It ends at the close of the Ordinary
General Meeting of Shareholders called to approve the financial statements for the previous financial
year and held in the year during which their term of office expires.
In the event of a vacancy due to death or resignation of one or more Directors, the Board of Directors
may make provisional appointments by co-optation in the period between two collective decisions by
the shareholders. These appointments are then submitted to the next Ordinary General Meeting of
Shareholders for ratification. A director appointed to replace another director performs his/her duties
for the remainder of his/her predecessor’s term of office.
Directors may be re-elected. They can be removed from office at any time by a decision of the Ordinary
General Meeting of Shareholders.
Deliberations of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors meets as often as required by the best interests of the Company, but at least
four times a year, after being convened by the Chairman. The Chief Executive Officer at any time, or
one-third of the Directors if the Board of Directors has not held a meeting for over two months, may
ask the Chairman to convene a Board meeting with regard to a specified agenda.
Invitations shall be sent in writing (fax, letter or e-mail), at least five business days prior to the meeting
of the Board on the first call and at least two business days before the meeting of the Board on the
second call. In case of emergency or if all the Directors accept, the period of prior notice may be
shortened.
Meetings shall be held at the registered office or in any other place mentioned in the meeting notice.
Within the limits provided for by law, the Board of Directors may meet and deliberate by any means,
including in particular video, fax, telephone conference, video conference, email or by any other
means. Directors participating in the Board meeting by video conference or other means of
telecommunication allowing the identification of participants and ensuring their effective participation
in accordance with the conditions defined by the internal regulations of the Board of Directors are
deemed to be present for the calculation of the quorum and majority.
The Board may also take certain decision by written consultation on matters within its remit in
accordance with applicable law and regulations.
Page 355
In case of written consultation, the Chairman shall send all documents necessary to take the decisions
on the consultation’s agenda, by any means, including by electronical communication, to each of the
directors, as well as the case may be to the statutory auditors and the representative of the Comité
Social et Economique.
The directors shall vote within the timeframe determined in the documents and sent their
observations, if any to the Chairman in writing by any means, including by electronical communication.
Any director failing to answer to in the timeframe (if unspecified in the documents, this timeframe
shall be of five (5) days after receipt of the documents) shall be considered as having abstained.
The written consultation shall be recorded in minutes signed by the Chairman which shall include an
annex with the answers of each directors and shall be sent to the Company to be recorded in the same
manner as the minutes of the deliberations of the Board of Directors.
The presence of at least half of the Board members in office is necessary for the validity of the Board’s
deliberations. A register of attendance is signed by the Directors attending the meeting.
Decisions shall be taken by a majority vote of the members present or represented at each meeting.
The Chairman of the Board of Directors has the casting vote.
Deliberations of the Board of Directors are recorded in minutes included in a special register and signed
by the Chairman of the meeting and at least one director or, in the event that the Chairman is unable
to do so, by at least two directors.
Copies or extracts of the minutes of the deliberations are validly certified by the Chairman of the Board
of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer, or a duly empowered representative authorized for such
purpose.
Powers of the Board of Directors
The Board of Directors determines the direction of the Company’s business activities and oversees the
implementation thereof in accordance with the Company’s social interest and taking into account
social and environmental aspects of its activity.
Subject to the powers expressly attributed to General Meetings of Shareholders and within the limit
of the corporate purpose, it addresses any matters affecting the proper governance of the Company
and settles the matters that concern it through its deliberations.
The Board of Directors performs the checks and verifications that it considers appropriate.
Each director must receive the necessary information for the performance of his/her duties and can
obtain all the documents he/she considers useful from the Executive Management.
In dealings with third parties, the Company is bound even by the acts of the Board of Directors which
do not fall within the scope of the corporate purpose or exceed the limitations on the powers provided
for in the bylaws applicable to it, if it cannot prove that the third party was aware that the act exceeded
such purpose or limitations, or that it could not fail to be aware of it given the circumstances.
The Chairman organizes and directs the Board of Directors’ work on which he/she reports to the
General Meeting of Shareholders and executes its decisions.
He/she makes sure that the Board of Directors functions properly and ensures that the directors are
in a position to carry out their duties.
Security, endorsements and guarantees given by the Company are mandatorily subject to
authorization by the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors has the capacity to decide on the issuance of bonds.
Page 356
The provisions of Article L. 225-38 of the French Commercial Code apply to agreements entered into,
directly or via an intermediary, between the Company and one of its Directors or Chief Executive
Officers.
4.5.3.2.2 General management (Article 15 of the Company’s bylaws)
Chief Executive Officer (Directeur Général)
Appointment - Removal
Depending on the choice made by the Board of Directors, the general management is carried out either
by the Chairman or by a natural person appointed by the Board of Directors and with the title of Chief
Executive Officer, who may be a director or not.
If the Board of Directors chooses to separate the duties of Chairman from those of Chief Executive
Officer, it shall proceed with the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer, set the length of his/her
term of office, determine his/her compensation and, where applicable, the limitations on his/her
powers.
The Chief Executive Officer must be less than 65 years old to exercise his/her functions. When in the
course of their duties this age limit is reached, the CEO will be deemed to have resigned from office.
The Chief Executive Officer may be removed from office at any time by the Board of Directors. When
the Chief Executive Officer does not perform the duties of Chairman of the Board of Directors, his/her
removal from office may give rise to damages, if it is decided without due cause.
Powers
When the general management of the Company is carried out by the Chairman of the Board of
Directors, these provisions apply to him.
The Chief Executive Officer has the broadest powers to act in any circumstances in the name of the
Company. He/she exercises these powers within the limit of the corporate purpose and subject to the
powers that the law and the bylaws expressly attribute to General Meetings of Shareholders and to
the Board of Directors and any limitations on the powers that are imposed on him/her by the Board of
Directors.
The Chief Executive Officer represents the Company in its dealings with third parties. The Company is
committed even by acts of the Chief Executive Officer that are not within the Company’s purpose,
unless it can prove that the third party knew that the act went beyond this purpose or could not have
been unaware thereof given the circumstances, mere publication of the bylaws not being sufficient to
constitute such proof.
Deputy Chief Executive Officers (Directeurs généraux délégués)
On the proposal of the Chief Executive Officer, whether such duties are carried out by the Chairman of
the Board of Directors or by another person, the Board of Directors may appoint one or more natural
persons responsible for assisting the Chief Executive Officer with the title of Deputy Chief Executive
Officer.
With regard to third parties the Deputy Chief Executive Officer(s) have the same powers as the Chief
Executive Officer subject, where applicable, to the specific limitations on powers that may be imposed
on them by the Board of Directors.
In the event of termination of the duties of the Chief Executive Officer or his/her inability to act, the
Deputy Chief Executive Officers shall retain their duties and their responsibilities until the appointment
of a new Chief Executive Officer unless otherwise decided by the Board of Directors.
Page 357
4.5.3.2.3 Internal regulations
The internal regulations of the Board of Directors were adopted by the Board of Directors on March
12, 2014 and updated on June 30, 2017, then on September 23, 2021.
The internal regulations of the Board of Directors, as well as the specialized Committees it describes,
supplement the legal and regulatory provisions, in compliance with the French Commercial Code and
the MiddleNext Code of Corporate Governance.
They set out, in particular, the role, the powers, the composition and the functioning of the Board of
Directors, duties and ethical obligations of its members, the conditions of their compensation and of
good information provision.
4.5.3.2.4 Ethical charter
The Company has implemented an ethical charter that was adopted by the Board of Directors on
November 16, 2018, as amended on March 26, 2020.
The ethical charter reminds the Company’s Directors, executive managers and employees of the
Company’s fundamental values of ethics and proper conduct. This document guides the Company’s
Directors, executive managers and employees in their decisions taken to ensure that they are in line
with the Company’s legal obligations and fundamental values of ethics.
4.5.3.2.5 Other policies
The Company has implemented an inside information policy that was adopted by the Board of
Directors on May 9, 2019, as amended on March 26, 2020. This policy reminds the Company’s
Directors, executive managers and employees of the rules applicable in stock exchange matters and
explain the requirements regarding the information they hold or may hold and what steps to take
when they or members of their family wish to acquire or dispose of the Company’s financial
instruments.
The Company has also implemented a corporate disclosure policy that was adopted by the Board of
Directors on March 26, 2020. This policy aims to provide consistent, full and fair public disclosure of
material information pertaining to the business of the Company, regardless of the nature of such
information, in accordance with applicable law.
4.5.3.3 Rights, privileges and restrictions attached to the Company’s shares (Articles 10 and 11 of
the Company’s bylaws)
4.5.3.3.1 Forms of the securities
The shares shall be in registered or bearer form, at the option of the shareholder, subject to the
provisions of laws and regulations in force. Shares that have not been paid up in full shall mandatorily
be in registered form.
4.5.3.3.2 Voting rights
The voting right attached to shares is proportionate to the percentage of capital represented by the
shares and each share carries the right to at least one vote. The General Meeting of Shareholders held
on January 8, 2015 decided to remove the automatic double voting rights as provided for by French
law No. 2014-384 of March 29, 2014 aimed at recapturing the real economy (known as the “Florange”
law).
4.5.3.3.3 Rights to dividends and profits
Each share entitles the holder to ownership of the corporate assets, to a share of the profits and the
liquidating dividend pro rata to the percentage of the share capital that it represents.
4.5.3.3.4 Preferred subscription rights
Page 358
All of the Company's shares carry preferred subscription rights in the event of any capital increases.
4.5.3.3.5 Limits on voting rights
None.
4.5.3.3.6 Identification of the holders of bearer shares
The Company is entitled, under the legal and regulatory provisions in force, to request at any time, at
its own cost, from the central depository which is responsible for keeping its securities issuance
account, the name or corporate name, nationality, year of birth or year of incorporation, and address
of the holders of securities granting voting rights at its own General Meetings of Shareholders
immediately or in future, together with the quantity of securities held by each of them, and where
applicable, the restrictions to which the securities may be subject and, more generally, to make use of
the provisions of Article L. 228-2 of the French Commercial Code with regard to identification of the
holders of securities granting voting rights at its own General Meetings of Shareholders immediately
or in future.
4.5.3.3.7 Company’s repurchase of its own shares
See Section 4.5.2.3 “Number, book value and nominal value of the shares held by the Company or for
the Company” of this Universal Registration Document.
4.5.3.4 Changes in the shareholders’ rights
Only the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders of the Company is empowered to make
decisions with the effect of changing the rights of the shareholders provided by the Company’s bylaws.
4.5.3.5 General Meetings of Shareholders
4.5.3.5.1 Common rules that apply to all General Meetings of Shareholders (article 20 of the
Company’s bylaws)
General Meetings of Shareholders are called under the conditions provided for by law.
General Meetings of Shareholders are held at the registered office or in any other location indicated
in the notices or letters calling them to the meeting, in France or in any other country.
The agenda is set in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations in force.
Participation in General Meetings of Shareholders, in any form whatsoever, shall be subject to
registering or recording shares under the conditions and within the time periods provided for by
regulations in effect.
A shareholder may give a proxy in order to be represented at any General Meetings of Shareholders in
accordance with the legal provisions in force. The specific proxy for each General Meeting is signed by
the person granting the proxy who states his/her last name, first names and address.
For any proxy from a shareholder without an indication of the proxy, the Chair of the General Meeting
of Shareholders casts a vote in favor of adoption of the draft resolutions presented or approved by the
Board of Directors and a vote against the adoption of all other draft resolutions.
Correspondence voting takes place in accordance with the terms and conditions set by the provisions
of the laws and regulations. Legal entities participate in General Meetings through their legal
representatives or any other person duly and properly authorized by them.
General Meetings are chaired by the Chairman of the Board of Directors. In his/her absence, the
General Meeting elects its chair itself.
Page 359
The duties of vote-tellers are carried out by the two members of the General Meeting present and
accepting such duties who hold the largest number of votes either in their own name or as proxy
holders. If they do not accept, the General Meeting elects its vote-tellers itself.
The officers of the Meeting appoint the secretary, who can be chosen from outside the shareholders.
An attendance sheet is kept under the conditions provided for by law.
The deliberations of the General Meeting of Shareholders are recorded in minutes signed by the
officers of the Meeting; these minutes must be included in a minute-book kept in accordance with
regulatory provisions.
4.5.3.5.2 Special provisions applicable to Ordinary General Meetings of Shareholders (article
21 of the Company’s bylaws)
The Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders is composed of all the shareholders regardless of the
number of shares they hold, on condition that all the amounts due thereon have been paid up.
In order to validly deliberate when called for the first time, the General Meeting must be composed of
a number of shareholders representing at least one-fifth of the shares with voting rights.
If this condition is not met, the General Meeting of Shareholders is adjourned and called again in
accordance with the forms provided for above. At this second meeting and, the deliberations made
with regard to the same agenda as the previous meeting are valid regardless of the number of shares
represented.
The deliberations of the Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders are taken by a majority of the votes
expressed in accordance with applicable law.
The Ordinary General Meeting of Shareholders can make any decisions other than those with the effect
of amending the bylaws either directly or indirectly.
It is held at least once a year, within six months of the end of the Company’s financial year, to approve
the annual financial statements, unless this time period is extended by an order of the President of the
Commercial Court deciding upon an application by the Board of Directors.
4.5.3.5.3 Special provisions with regard to Extraordinary General Meetings of Shareholders
(Article 22 of the Company’s bylaws)
Only the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders is empowered to make decisions with the
effect of amending the bylaws either directly or indirectly. Based on the decisions of the General
Meeting of Shareholders held on June 24, 2020, the Board is empowered to make decisions with the
effect of amending the bylaws in order to ensure their compliance with applicable laws and
regulations, subject to the ratification of such decision by the next General Meeting of Shareholders.
The Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders is composed of all shareholders regardless of the
number of shares they hold, on condition that all the amounts due thereon have been paid up.
In order to validly deliberate when called for the first time, the General Meeting must be composed of
a number of shareholders representing at least one-fourth of the shares with voting rights.
If this condition is not met, the General Meeting of Shareholders shall be adjourned and called again
in accordance with the forms provided for above. At this second meeting and, where applicable, any
subsequent meetings, the deliberations made with regard to the same agenda as the previous meeting
are valid if the General Meeting is composed of a number of shareholders representing at least one-
fifth of the shares with voting rights. If no quorum is reached, the second General Meeting may be
extended until a date no more than two months later than that on which it was called.
The deliberations of the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders are taken by a majority of two-
thirds of the votes expressed in accordance with applicable law.
Page 360
By way of exception, the Extraordinary General Meeting of Shareholders may decide under the
quorum and majority requirements provided for Ordinary General Meetings of Shareholders when the
increase in capital takes place via the capitalization of reserves, profits or share premiums.
4.4.3.6 Mechanisms making it possible to delay, defer or prevent a change of control
The Company’s bylaws do not provide any mechanism that may delay, defer or prevent a change of
control.
4.5.3.7 Crossing of ownership thresholds (Article 10 of the Company’s bylaws)
In addition to the legal obligations of declaration of crossing of thresholds, any natural person or legal
entity, acting alone or in concert, who becomes the holder, in any manner whatsoever within the
meaning of Articles L. 233-7 et seq. of the French Commercial Code, of a fraction equal to 2% of the
share capital or voting rights, or any multiple of this percentage, must inform the Company of the total
number of shares and voting rights of the Company that it owns (or that it may subsequently own in
accordance with the meaning of Article L. 233-7 of the French Commercial Code), before and after the
transaction that led to the crossing of such threshold, and the nature of this transaction. This
declaration shall be made via a registered letter with return receipt requested (or by any equivalent
means for persons who are resident outside France) sent to the registered office, at the latest, prior to
the close of trade on the fourth trading day following the day on which the shareholding threshold is
crossed.
This obligation applies under the same conditions as those provided for in Articles L. 233-7 et seq. of
the French Commercial Code, whenever the fraction of the capital or voting rights held falls below one
of the thresholds provided for in the aforementioned articles.
In the event of non-compliance with the above provisions, a shareholder who has not duly and properly
made the declaration shall be deprived of the voting rights attached to the shares exceeding the
fraction that has not been duly declared for any General Meeting of Shareholders that may be held,
until the expiration of the time period provided for by French law and regulations in force following
the date on which the notification is duly made. This sanction will only be applied upon a request,
recorded in the minutes of the General Meeting of Shareholders, of one or more shareholders holding
at least three percent (3%) of the Company’s capital.
4.5.3.8 Specific conditions governing changes to the share capital
In the Company’s bylaws, there is no specific provision governing the change in its share capital that
would be stricter than the legal provisions.
4.5.4 Documents available to the public
Copies of this Universal Registration Document are available without charge at the registered office of
the Company, 259/261 Avenue Jean Jaurès – Immeuble le Sunway – 69007 Lyon.
the website of the AMF (www.amf-france.org).
The Company's bylaws, the minutes of general meetings of shareholders and other corporate
documents, as well as historical financial information and all expert valuations and statements issued
at the Company's request that must be made available to its shareholders under applicable laws can
be examined, without charge at the registered office of the Company.
Regulated information within the meaning of the provisions of the AMF General Regulation are also
available on the Company’s website (www.poxel.com).
Page 361
5 APPENDIXES
5.1
Responsible Persons, third party information, expert reports and approval of the competent
authority
5.1.1 Person in charge of the Universal Registration Document
Mr. Thomas Kuhn, Chief Executive Officer (Directeur Général)
5.1.2 Certification by the person in charge
I certify, that the information contained in this Universal Registration Document is, to the best of my
knowledge, in accordance with the facts and contains no omission likely to affect its import.
I certify that, to my knowledge, the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the
applicable accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the Group’s assets and liabilities,
financial position and results of operations, and that the management report, the table of concordance
for which is set out on pages 374 and following, gives a reliable account of the developments in
business activities, the results of operations and the financial position of the Company and all
companies included in the consolidation as well as a description of the main risks and uncertainties
with which they are faced.
Made in Lyon, on May 4th, 2022
Mr. Thomas Kuhn,
Chief Executive Officer
5.1.3 Person in charge of financial reporting
Ms. Anne Renevot,
Chief Financial Officer
Address: 259/261 Avenue Jean Jaurès - Immeuble le Sunway - 69007 Lyon
Phone: 0033 4 37 37 20 10
5.1.4 Expert reports or declaration
Not applicable.
5.1.5 Attestation related to third party information
Not applicable.
5.1.6 Control of this Universal Registration Document
This Universal Registration Document has been filed with the AMF on May 4th, 2022 as competent
authority pursuant to the Prospectus Regulation, without prior approval in accordance with article 9
of the Prospectus Regulation.
The Universal Registration Document may be used for the purposes of any public offering or the
admission to trading of any Company’s securities on a regulated market if it is completed by a specific
note on the said securities, a summary and any potential amendment to the Universal Registration
Document. This whole documentation shall be approved by the AMF in accordance with the Prospectus
Regulation.
Page 362
5.2
Concordance Table
5.2.1 Concordance table with Appendixes 1 and 2 of the Prospectus Regulation
The table of concordance below allows you to identify in this Universal Registration Document the
Information listed under Appendixes 1 and 2 of the Prospectus Regulation.
Reference
in this
Universal
Registration
Document
Reference
Annexes 1 and 2 of regulation n° 2019 / 980
Persons responsible, third party information, experts’ reports and
competent authority approval
Section 1
Section 5.1
Sections
5.1.1 &
5.1.3
Point 1.1
Persons responsible for the information
Section
5.1.2
Section
5.1.4
Section
5.1.5
Section
5.1.6
Point 1.2
Point 1.3
Point 1.4
Point 1.5
Section 2
Point 2.1
Point 2.2
Section 3
Point 3.1
Section 4
Point 4.1
Declaration by the persons responsible for the urd
Expert statement or report
Other statements in case of information sourced from a third party
Statement concerning the approval of the urd
Statutory auditors
Section 4.5
Sections
4.5.1 & 4.5.2
Identification details
Section
4.5.3
Changes
Risk factors
Section 2.2
Section 2.2
Section 1.2
Description of the material risks
Information about the issuer
Legal and commercial name
Section
1.2.2.1
Sections
1.2.2.2 &
1.2.2.4
Section
1.2.2.3
Sections
1.2.2.2 &
1.2.2.4
Point 4.2
Point 4.3
Point 4.4
Section 5
Registration and legal entity identifier (lei)
Date of incorporation and length of life
Domicile – legal form – applicable law – website – other
Business overview
Section 2.1
Page 363
Reference
in this
Universal
Registration
Document
Section
Reference
Annexes 1 and 2 of regulation n° 2019 / 980
Point 5.1
Principal activities
2.1.1
Section
2.1.1
Sections
2.1.4 & 2.1.5
Sections
Point 5.1.1
Point 5.1.2
Nature of operations and principal activities
New products and/or services
Point 5.2
Point 5.3
Principal markets
Important events
2.1.4, 2.1.5,
2.1.6 & 2.1.7
Sections
2.1.1, 2.1.4,
2.1.5,2.1.6
& 2.1.7
Section
2.1.3
Section
2.2.3
Section
2.1.8
Point 5.4
Point 5.5
Point 5.6
Point 5.7
Point 5.7.1
Strategy and objectives (financial and non-financial)
Extent of dependency
Competitive position
Section
1.3.2
Investments
Section
1.3.2.1
Section
1.3.2.2 &
1.3.2.3
Section
2.4.1.2
Material investments made
Point 5.7.2
Current investments or firm commitments
Point 5.7.3
Point 5.7.4
Section 6
Point 6.1
Point 6.2
Section 7
Point 7.1
Point 7.1.1
Joint ventures and significant stakes
Environmental impact on tangible fixed assets
Organisational structure
N/A
Section 2.4
Section
2.4.1
Section
2.4.1.2
Brief description of the group
List of significant subsidiaries
Operating and financial review
Section 3.1
Section
3.1.1
Financial condition
Review of the development and performance of the business
Section 3
Page 364
Reference
in this
Universal
Registration
Document
Sections
Reference
Annexes 1 and 2 of regulation n° 2019 / 980
Future development and activities in the field of research and
development
Point 7.1.2
2.1.4 &
2.1.5
Sections
3.1.4 & 3.1.5
Point 7.2
Point 7.2.1
Point 7.2.2
Section 8
Point 8.1
Point 8.2
Point 8.3
Point 8.4
Point 8.5
Section 9
Operating results
Section
3.1.3
Significant factors
Material changes in net sales or revenues
Capital resources
N/A
Section
3.1.6
Section
3.1.6.1
Section
3.1.6.2
Section
3.1.6.1
Section
3.1.6.1
Section
3.1.6.1
Section
2.1.1.0
Section
2.1.1.0 &
3.1.3
Capital resources (short and long term)
Cash flows
Borrowing requirements and funding structure
Restrictions on the use of capital resources
Anticipated sources of funds
Regulatory environment
Description of the regulatory environment and of the exterior
factors that affect the operations
Point 9.1
Section
2.1.12
Section 10
Trend information
Section
2.1.12
Point 10.1
A) most significant recent trends
B) significant change in the financial performance of the group
since the end of the last financial period
Section
2.1.12
Sections 2.2,
3.1.3, 3.2.6
& 3.3.2
Point 10.2
Elements reasonably likely to have a material effect on prospects
Section
3.1.12
Section
3.1.12
Section
3.1.12
Section
3.1.12
Section 11
Point 11.1
Point 11.2
Point 11.3
Profit forecasts or estimates
Forecast or estimate of the current profits
Principal assumptions
Statement on the profit forecast or estimates
Page 365
Reference
in this
Universal
Registration
Document
Section
4.1.1
Section
4.1.1.1.1
Section
Reference
Annexes 1 and 2 of regulation n° 2019 / 980
Administrative, management and supervisory bodies and senior
management
Details concerning the members of administrative and
management bodies
Section 12
Point 12.1
Point 12.2
Section 13
Point 13.1
Point 13.2
Section 14
Point 14.1
Point 14.2
Point 14.3
Point 14.4
Point 14.5
Section 15
Point 15.1
Conflicts of interest
4.1.1.1.2
Remuneration and benefits
Remuneration and benefits in kind paid or granted
Provisions for pensions or other similar benefits
Board practices
Section 4.2
Sections
4.2.1 & 4.2.2
Section 4.3
Section
4.1.2
Section
4.1.2.1
Section
4.1.2.2
Section
4.1.2.3
Duration of mandates
Service contracts
Committees
Section
4.1.2.5
Compliance with governance rules
Potential material impacts and future changes in corporate
governance
N/A
Section
2.4.2
Section
2.4.2.1
Employees
Breakdown of employees
Sections 4.3,
4.5.2.4.1,
4.5.2.4.2,
4.5.2.4.3&
4.5.2.4.4
Sections
2.4.2.3 &
2.4.2.4
Point 15.2
Point 15.3
Shareholdings and stock options
Arrangements for involving the employees in the share capital
Section 16
Point 16.1
Point 16.2
Major shareholders
Section 4.3
Section
4.3.1
Section
4.3.5
Breakdown of shareholding
Different voting rights
Page 366
Reference
in this
Universal
Registration
Document
Section
Reference
Annexes 1 and 2 of regulation n° 2019 / 980
Point 16.3
Control of the issuer
4.3.6
Section
4.3.8
Point 16.4
Shareholder agreements
Related party transactions
Details of related party transactions
Section 17
Point 17.1
Section 4.4
Section 4.4
Section 3
Financial information concerning the issuer’s assets and liabilities,
financial position and profits and losses
Section 18
Point 18.1
Section 3.2
& 3.3
Historical financial information
Section 3.2
& 3.3
Point 18.1.1
Point 18.1.2
Point 18.1.3
Point 18.1.4
Point 18.1.5
Point 18.1.6
Point 18.1.7
Point 18.2
Audited historical financial information
Change of accounting reference date
Accounting standards
N/A
Section
3.1.2
Section
3.1.2
Section 1.3
& 3.2
Change of accounting framework
Minimum content of audited historical financial information
Consolidated financial statements
Age of financial information
Section 3.2
Section 3.2
& 3.3
Interim and other financial information
Quarterly or half-yearly financial information
Auditing of historical annual financial information
Auditor’s report
N/A
N/A
Point 18.2.1
Point 18.3
Section 3.4
Section 3.4
Section 3.5
N/A
Point 18.3.1
Point 18.3.2
Point 18.3.3
Point 18.4
Other audited information
Non-audited financial information
Pro forma financial information
N/A
Point 18.4.1
Significant gross change of assets, liabilities and earnings
N/A
Page 367
Reference
in this
Universal
Registration
Document
Section
Reference
Annexes 1 and 2 of regulation n° 2019 / 980
Point 18.5
Dividend policy
3.5.3
Section
3.5.3
Point 18.5.1
Point 18.5.2
Point 18.6
Description
Amount of the dividend per share
Legal and arbitration proceedings
Significant proceedings
N/A
Section
2.1.11
Section
2.1.11
Point 18.6.1
Point 18.7
Significant change in the issuer’s financial position
Significant change since the end of the last financial period
Additional information
N/A
N/A
Point 18.7.1
Section 19
Point 19.1
Section
4.5.2
Section
4.5.2
Share capital
Section
4.5.2.1
Section
4.5.2.3
Section
4.5.2.3
Section
4.5.2.4
Section
4.5.2.5
Section
4.5.2.6
Section
4.5.2.7
Section
4.5.3
Point 19.1.1
Point 19.1.2
Point 19.1.3
Point 19.1.4
Point 19.1.5
Point 19.1.6
Point 19.1.7
Point 19.2
Amount of issued capital
Non-equity securities
Treasury shares
Convertible securities, exchangeable securities or securities with
warrants
Terms of any acquisition rights and/or obligations
Option or agreement
History of share capital
Certificate of incorporation and by-laws
Registration and corporate purpose
Existing classes of shares
Section
4.5.3.1
Section
4.5.3.3
Section
4.5.3.6
Point 19.2.1
Point 19.2.2
Point 19.2.3
Section 20
Provisions impacting a change in control
Material contracts
Section 2.3
Page 368
Reference
in this
Universal
Registration
Document
Reference
Annexes 1 and 2 of regulation n° 2019 / 980
Point 20.1
Section 21
Point 21.1
Summary of each contract
Documents available
Section 2.3
Section
4.5.4
Section
4.5.4
Statement on available documents
5.2.2 Table of concordance with the Annual Financial Report
The table of concordance below allows you to identify in this Universal Registration Document all
elements of the financial report as set forth in articles L. 451-1-2 of the French Monetary and Financial
Code and 222-3 of the AMF General Regulation.
Reference in this
Universal Registration
Document
Annual financial report
Pages
1
Certification of the person responsible for the annual
financial report
Section 5.1.1
362
2
3
4
5
Management report
See index below
See index below
Section 3.5.9
Corporate governance report
Communication of auditors’ fees
284
182
Financial statements prepared in accordance with ifrs
standards
Section 3.2
6
Report of the statutory auditors on the consolidated
financial statements prepared in accordance with ifrs
standards
Section 3.4.1
267
7
8
Annual financial statements
Section 3.3
235
274
Report of the statutory auditors on the annual
financial statements
Section 3.4.2
Page 369
5.2.3 Table of concordance with management report
The table of concordance below allows you to identify in this Universal Registration Document all
elements of the management report as required by articles L. 225-100 et seq., L. 232-1, II and R. 225-
102 et seq. of the French Commercial Code.
Reference in
this Universal
Registration
Document
Management report
Pages
1
Situation of the company and activity during the past financial Section 2.1 &
18 & 162
year
3
2
3
4
Foreseeable developments and prospects for the future
Section 2.1
18
Important events that have occurred since the close of the year Section 3.5.8
283
Activities of subsidiaries and controlled companies
Sections 2.4.1
& 3
122 &
162
5
6
Key financial and non-financial performance indicators, Sections 1.3 &
16 & 132
162
including information on environmental and personnel matters
2.5
Objective and exhaustive analysis of the company's business
development, results and financial situation, in particular the
debt situation of the company and the group
Section 3
7
8
Principal risks and uncertainties the company is facing / use of
financial instruments by the company / technological risks
Section 2.2
Section 2.5
87
Taking into account the social and environmental
consequences of the activity, including the consequences on
climate change and the use of goods and services produced, as
well as societal commitments to sustainable development, the
circular economy, the fight against food waste and the fight
against discrimination and the promotion of diversity
132
306
9
Internal control and risk management procedures relating to
the preparation and processing of accounting and financial Section 4.5.2.8
information
10
11
Information on financial risks related to the effects of climate
change
N/A
Activity in research and development
Sections 2.1.7
& 3.1.4.2.1
70 & 167
352
12
13
Existing branch
N/A
Changes in the composition of the capital during the financial
year
Section 4.5.2.7
Page 370
14
Significant stakes assumed in companies having their
headquarters in France, or assuming control of such
companies; transfers of said stakes
N/A
15
16
Participation of employees in the capital at the end of the
financial year
130
Section 2.4.2.3
Information relating to the distribution of capital and the self- Sections 4.3 &
assessment - share buyback program
325 &
336
4.5.2.3
Section 4.5.2.4
Section 4.3.11
Section 3.5.4
Section 3.5.3
Section 3.5.5
Section 3.5.7
N/A
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Adjustment of securities giving access to the share capital
Change in the share - risk of price variation
Allocation of results
337
327
282
282
282
283
Summary of dividends distributed during the last three years
Expenses not deductible for tax purposes
Information on timeframes for payment of suppliers
Injunctions or financial penalties for antitrust practices
Inter-company loan amounts
N/A
Classified facilities falling within the scope of article l. 225-102-
2 of the French commercial code
N/A
26
Summary of operations of the executives and the persons
mentioned in article l. 621-18-2 of the French monetary and
financial code on company securities sold during the financial
year
Section 4.3.4
326
281
27
Table of results over the past five financial years
Section 3.5.1
Page 371
5.2.4 Table of concordance with the corporate governance report
The table of concordance below allows you to identify in this Universal Registration Document all
elements of the corporate governance report as required by articles L. 225-37 et seq. and L. 22-10-8
et seq. of the French Commercial Code.
Reference in this
Universal Registration
Document
Corporate governance report
Pages
1
Board of directors and general management
List of all terms of office and functions performed by
each corporate officer
Section 4.1.1
285
Composition and conditions for preparing and
organizing works of the board of directors
285, 294
& 355
Sections 4.1.1.1, 4.1.2 &
4.5.3.2.1
Gender balance on the board of directors -
description of the diversity policy
Section 4.1.1.1.1
285
Possible limitations on the powers of the chief
executive officer by the board of directors
328 &
355
Sections 4.4.2 & 4.5.3.2
Information relating to agreements entered into
between the company and (i) an officer holding more
than 10% of the voting rights of a company or (ii) a
company holding more than half of the share capital
of the company.
Section 4.4.2
328
2
Board committees
Audit committee
Section 4.1.2.3.1
Section 4.1.2.3.2
Section 4.1.2.3.3
Section 4.1.2.3.4
Section 4.1.2.3.5
Section 4.1.2.3.6
Section 4.1.2.5
295
297
298
300
301
303
303
Compensation committee
Business development committee
Scientific advisory committee
Governance and nominations committee
Strategic committee
Corporate governance code
Compensation
3
Remuneration policy of the corporate officers
Section 4.2.1
309
Page 372
Remuneration and benefits of any kind paid during or
awarded in respect of the fiscal year to each Sections 4.2.1 to 4.2.6
corporate officer
309 - 320
309 - 320
Commitments made by the company to its corporate
officers upon or after taking up / terminating / Sections 4.2.1 to 4.2.6
changing functions (including pension commitments)
Allocation of bonus shares, options and share
subscription warrants
Sections 4.2.4 to 4.5.2.4 320 - 337
Elements of compensation and benefits due or likely
to be due owing to or after the termination of the
duties of executive directors of the company
Section 4.2.5
320
321
Ratios between the remuneration of executive
directors and the average and median remunerations
of the company employees
Section 4.2.8.1
Explanation on how the total remuneration complies
with the remuneration policy adopted, including the
way it contributes to long term performances of the
company and the way the performance criteria has
been applied
Section 4.2.9
Section 4.2.8
322
321
Manner in which the vote of the last ordinary general
meeting provided for by ii of article l. 225-100 of the
French commercial code has been taken into account
Deviation from the procedure for the implementation
of the remuneration policy and any derogations
Section 4.2.9
322
4
5
Conflicts of interest
Section 4.1.1.2
293
Delegation of authorities or competence granted by
the general meeting of shareholders for capital
increases
Section 4.5.2.5
Section 4.5.3.5
346
359
6
7
Participation of shareholders in the general meeting
of shareholders
Items likely to have an impact in the event of a public
offer required by article l. 225-37-5 of the French
commercial code.
Section 4.5.2.8
353
Structure of the company’s capital
Section 4.5.2.8.1
353
Restrictions provided for in the bylaws on the
exercise of voting rights and share transfers or clauses
brought to the company’s attention pursuant to
article l. 233-11 of the French commercial code.
Section 4.5.2.8.2
353
Page 373
Direct or indirect shareholdings in the company’s
capital of which it is aware pursuant to articles l. 233-
7 and l. 233-12 of the French commercial code
Section 4.5.2.8.3
Section 4.5.2.8.4
353
353
List of the holders of any securities carrying special
controlling rights and description of such securities
Control mechanisms provided for in any employee
share ownership system, where the controlling rights
are not exercised by the employees
Section 4.5.2.8.5
Section 4.5.2.8.6
354
354
Agreements between shareholders of which the
company is aware and that may result in restrictions
on the transfer of shares and the exercise of voting
rights
Rules applicable to the appointment and replacement
of members of the board of directors and
amendment of the bylaws
Section 4.5.2.8.7
Section 4.5.2.8.8
Section 4.5.2.9
354
354
354
Powers of the board of directors, in particular the
issuance or repurchase of shares
Agreements entered into by the company that have
been amended or end in the event of a change in
control of the company
Agreements providing for indemnities for members
of the board of directors or employees, if they resign
or are dismissed without real or serious cause or if
their employment terminates due to a public offering
N/A
Page 374