September 4, 2009
|
|
|
Mr. Mark P. Shulman, Branch Chief Legal
Mr. Matthew Crispino
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Mail Stop: 4561
Washington, D.C. 20549
|
|
Via EDGAR and
Federal Express |
|
Re: |
|
Vuzix Corporation Amendment No. 2 to Registration Statement on Form S-1
filed July 13, 2009 (File No. 333-160417) |
Gentlemen:
On behalf of Vuzix Corporation (the Registrant), attached for your review is a copy of
Amendment No. 2 (the Amendment) to the Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 333-160417 (as
previously amended, the Registration Statement), as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Commission) on the date hereof via EDGAR and marked to show changes from the
Registration Statement filed with the Commission on July 13, 2009.
The Amendment is being filed in response to comments received from the staff of the Commission
(the Staff) by letter dated August 13, 2009, with respect to the Registration Statement (the
Comments). The numbering of the paragraphs below corresponds to the numbering of the Comments,
which for the Staffs convenience, have been incorporated into this response letter. Page
references in the text of this response letter correspond to the page numbers in the Amendment.
General
1. In your response letter, please tell us whether you will select an offering price prior to the
effective date. If you plan to identify an offering price range in the filing that is declared
effective and thereafter specify the offering price in a prospectus filed in accordance with Rule
424(b), please revise the cover page so that it shows pricing information in a price-range format.
Confirm that in either case you will file a pre-effective amendment that discloses that price and
includes all price-dependent information.
The
Registrant plans to identify an offering price prior to the effective date. The Registrant
confirms that it will file a pre-effective amendment that discloses that price and includes all
price-dependent information.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 2
2. Your disclosure throughout the prospectus assumes that you will receive the full amount of the
offering. Revise your disclosure in the prospectus summary and throughout the body of the
prospectus to show the impact of receiving proceeds at varying levels, e.g., 10%, 25%, 50%, 75% and
100% of the shares being sold. This comment is applicable to sections of the filing such as Use of
Proceeds section, Capitalization, Dilution section, and the liquidity discussion in Managements
Discussion, for example.
We
respectfully note that the offering is now being conducted on a
best efforts basis, subject to the receipt of minimum gross proceeds
of Cdn $6,000,000. The requested disclosure has been made taking
the minimum offering proceeds into account. Please see the Use of Proceeds, Capitalization, Dilution
and Liquidity and Capital Resources sections in the Amendment.
Cover Page
3. In
the second sentence of the first paragraph, state that the offering
is conducted on a best
efforts, no minimum basis. Please make similar revisions to your prospectus summary and other
areas of your prospectus, as appropriate.
We
respectfully note that the offering is now being conducted on a
commercially reasonable efforts basis, subject to
the receipt of minimum gross proceeds of Cdn $6,000,000. The prospectus summary and other areas of the
prospectus have been revised accordingly. Please see the cover page and prospectus summary in the
Amendment.
4. In the context of a best-efforts, no minimum offering, the presentation of the proceeds table
does not appear to be necessary or appropriate. Instead simply state the maximum gross and net
proceeds that you may receive and accompany that information with a statement that you may not
receive any proceeds from the offering. Also, state concisely the period during which the offering
will be conducted. Also, briefly indicate that the number of shares offered may be increased in
circumstances you describe concisely.
We
respectfully note that the offering is now being conducted on a commercially reasonable efforts basis, subject to
the receipt of minimum gross proceeds of Cdn $6,000,000 and the proceeds table has been revised
accordingly. The cover page has also been revised to state the period during which the offering
will be conducted. Please see the cover page in the Amendment.
The Registrant does not contemplate that the number of shares offered will be increased under any
circumstances except upon exercise of the agents overallotment option on the terms described in
the Amendment.
5. The information you provide in footnotes (3) and (4) to the proceeds table is more detailed than
necessary to inform potential investors of the general terms of the compensation the selling agents
may receive. Your cover page disclosure should be limited to information that is required by Item
501 of Regulation S-K or that you believe is key information that must be provided to the potential
investors to introduce them to the company and its offering. The
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 3
information you provide on the cover page in this regard is also provided at page 3. Consistent
with Rule 421(d), the forepart of your filing should not reiterate information and should be
concise. Details regarding compensation should be presented in the Underwriting section, which you
can reference on the cover page.
The requested deletions have been made. Please see the cover page in the Amendment.
6. We note that the offering price is presented in Canadian dollars. Clarify whether the payments
by investors in the US must be in Canadian dollars or will be accepted by Canaccord Adams, Inc. if
provided in US dollars. If payments in US dollars will be accepted, concisely state how the
exchange rate used will be computed.
The requested revisions have been made. Please see the cover page in the Amendment.
7. You refer to the closing date and to the closing of the offering throughout the filing. In
the prospectus, concisely explain when the closing will occur and clarify the length of the period
between an investors payment of funds and delivery of those funds to the company (and the related
issuance of shares to investors). In your response letter, explain in detail when subscription
proceeds will be received by the selling agents and explain how and where those proceeds will be
held before they are delivered to the issuer.
The requested revisions have been made. Please see the cover page in the Amendment.
The Registrants agents will receive subscription proceeds at the closing and those proceeds will
immediately be transferred to the Registrant. Accordingly, neither the Registrant nor the agents
have made any arrangements to place such funds in an escrow, trust, or similar account. The cover
page in the Amendment has been revised accordingly.
8. In your response letter, please tell us whether you believe you will satisfy all applicable
listing standards of the TSX-V irrespective of the number of securities you sell in the best
efforts, no-minimum offering. If you must sell a portion of the offered securities in order to
satisfy one or more of the listing criteria, please modify your reference to the listing
application as appropriate.
We
respectfully note that the offering is now being conducted on a
commercially reasonable efforts basis, subject to the
receipt of minimum gross proceeds of Cdn $6,000,000. The Registrant believes that, subject to the
receipt of the minimum gross proceeds from the offering, it will satisfy all applicable listing
standards of the TSX-V. Accordingly, the Registrant believes that no
modification of the disclosure regarding the listing application is
necessary.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 4
Inside Cover Page
9. We note that you have included several pages of graphics. In your response letter, please
explain how the artwork will be presented. In particular, tell us whether you will use a gatefold
presentation for the inside cover that will set out two of the pages of artwork as the inside
cover.
The artwork will be presented as a gatefold for the inside cover of the prospectus.
General Matters, page ii
10. Between the cover page and the prospectus summary you may only present information that may be
provided on the inside front cover under Item 502 of Regulation S-K. While you may retain the
prospectus delivery legend on the inside cover page, please move the remaining General Matters
discussion and the section that follows on Use of Market and Industry Data after the risk factor
disclosure so that it does not interrupt the flow of the information required by Rule 421(b).
The requested revisions have been made. Please see page 24 of the Amendment.
Prospectus Summary, page 1
11. Please balance your summary by briefly discussing the most material challenges and risks facing
your company. For example, consider highlighting your history of operating losses, your reliance
on a limited number of customers for a significant amount of your revenues, and that your
management will continue to own a significant percentage of your outstanding common stock following
completion of this offering. Please provide this information, which would be useful to investors
being introduced to your company, under the subheading Company Overview.
The requested disclosure has been made. Please see page 1 of the Amendment.
12. In describing the over-allotment option on page 3, you state that the warrants in this option
will only be issued for the purpose of distribution of units to purchasers. Please clarify the
purpose for which shares covered by the option might be utilized and how it differs from that
regarding the related warrants.
Both the shares of common stock and warrants issuable upon exercise of the options will be issued
only for the purpose of distribution of units to purchasers and the description of the
over-allotment option in the prospectus summary and throughout the summary has been revised
accordingly. Please see the prospectus summary in the Amendment.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 5
Risk Factors, page 8
13. Item 503(c) of Regulation S-K requires that you set forth each risk factor under a subcaption
that adequately describes the risk. Many of your current risk factor subcaptions do not
adequately describe the risk to investors. As examples, we note the following subcaptions:
|
|
|
We have a limited operating history in the Video Eyewear products industry; |
|
|
|
Our US government defense contracts and subcontracts are subject to procurement laws
and regulations; and |
|
|
|
Our Video Eyewear products require ongoing research and development. |
Please review each risk factor and revise as necessary to succinctly state in your subheading
the risks that result from the facts or uncertainties facing the company or this offering.
Generally speaking, you will best accomplish this by phrasing the risk factor subcaption in the
form of a statement of cause and effect, If X, then Y or Because of X, Y is probable.
The requested revisions have been made. Please see the revised subheadings in the Risk Factors
section of the Amendment.
14. Please provide your assessment of whether the uncertainty regarding the existence of an
effective registration statement relating to the exercise of the warrants included in the units
poses a material adverse risk to investors that should be discussed in this section. In addition,
please consider whether there are material uncertainties regarding your ability to confirm to
applicable requirements of state securities registration laws with respect to the exercise of such
warrants.
Upon consideration, the Registrant has concluded that the uncertainty regarding the existence of an
effective registration statement relating to the exercise of the warrants included in the units
poses a material adverse risk to investors that should be discussed in the Risk Factor section and
the section has been revised accordingly. Please see page 19 of the Amendment.
We have a limited operating history..., page 7
15. You disclose in this risk factor that you began selling your monocular eyewear products six
years ago and shipped your first binocular Video Eyewear model over four years ago. Given this
history of operations, please explain why you believe you have an insufficient amount of past
experience upon which investors may evaluate your business and prospects.
Notwithstanding that it sold its first monocular eyewear products six years ago and its first
binocular eyewear products four years ago, the Registrant believes that it has an insufficient
amount of past experience upon which investors may evaluate its Video Eyewear business and its
prospects in the Video Eyewear market because until 2008 the Registrant derived the majority
Securities
and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 6
of its revenues from sales of night vision display electronics to defense contractors and from
sales directly to the US Department of Defense, primarily for engineering programs. Although the
technologies upon which the Registrants night vision display electronics products are based are
similar to those incorporated in the Registrants Video Eyewear products and although the
engineering services the Registrant has provided under contract with the US Department of Defense
are applicable to development of the Registrants Video Eyewear, those products and services and
the markets for them are substantially different from Registrants Video Eyewear products (even
those Video Eyewear products targeted to the defense markets) and the markets for them. In
particular there are few alternatives to near-to-eye displays in the defense markets where privacy,
security, covertness, wearability, size and portability have strategic advantages. In the consumer
markets these are typically not issues and therefore the consumer can look directly at alternative
direct view display technology. Additionally microdisplay technology is relatively more expensive
than direct view displays and has lower resolutions and an overall product form factor that is
not attractive to many consumers. In contrast, these criteria are not
an issue in defense markets.
Our business depends on our development of new products and technologies. Page 10
16. We note your statement in this risk factor that rapid technological change in your industry
imposes pricing pressure on your products. Please quantify the impact such pressure has had on
your prices and operating results over the last two years. Also, please address in your
Managements Discussion the extent to which material increases in your sales over the past two
years are attributable to increases in the prices of your products. See Item 303(a)(3)(iii).
The requested disclosure has been made. Please see the revised risk factor on page 10 of the
Amendment and the Managements Discussion and Analysis section of the Amendment.
If we fail to implement and maintain an effective system of internal controls, page 21
17. We note the following statement in this risk factor: Under the SEC rules currently in effect,
both the management assessment of your internal control over financial reporting and the
attestation of managements assessment by our independent registered public accountants will first
apply to our annual report for the 2009 fiscal year. However, Instruction 1 to Item 308 of
Regulation S-K states that a registrant does not have to comply with the requirements in Item 308
to provide managements report on the registrants internal control over financial reporting or an
attestation report from the registrants accountants until it either had been required to file an
annual report pursuant to section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act for the prior fiscal year or
had filed an annual report with the Commission for the prior fiscal year. Accordingly, it does not
appear that you will be required to provide either managements report or your accountants
attestation report for your 2009 fiscal year. Please revise the disclosure in this risk factor
accordingly.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 7
The requested revision has been made. Please see the revised risk factor on page 21 of the
Amendment.
Use of Proceeds, page 25
18. Expand your disclosure to discuss how your plans for use of proceeds from this offering will
change if less than the maximum proceeds are obtained. See Instruction 1 to Item 504 of Regulation
S-K. Also, we note your disclosure that you plan to use $916,065 of the net proceeds from this
offering to repay the outstanding principal and interest on your lines of credit and notes payable.
Please set forth the interest rate and maturity of such indebtedness. See Instruction 4 to Item
504. Ensure that your statements regarding any intent to repay debt are accompanied by disclosure
that informs stockholders that there can be no assurance that you will receive sufficient offering
proceeds to pay any of the debts that you hope to repay with offering proceeds.
The requested disclosure has been made. Please see the Use of Proceeds section of the Amendment.
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Developments and Estimates
Stock-based Compensation, page 36
19. Please provide us with the following information in chronological order for stock option grants
and other equity related transactions for the one year period preceding the most recent balance
sheet date:
|
|
|
The nature and type of stock option or other equity related transaction; |
|
|
|
|
The date of grant/issuance; |
|
|
|
|
Description/name of option or equity holder; |
|
|
|
|
The reason for the grant or equity related issuance; |
|
|
|
|
The number of options or equity instruments granted or issues; |
|
|
|
|
The exercise price or conversion price; |
|
|
|
|
The fair value of underlying shares of common stock; |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments made in determining the fair value of the underlying shares of common stock,
such as illiquidity discounts, minority discounts, etc.; |
|
|
|
|
The total amount of deferred compensation or value assigned to any beneficial conversion
feature reconciled to your financial statement disclosures; |
|
|
|
|
The amount and timing of expense recognition; and |
|
|
|
|
Indicate for each option grant or equity related transaction what valuation methodology
used (market approach, etc.), whether it was contemporaneous or retrospective and whether
it was performed by an unrelated specialist. |
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 8
Continue to provide us with updates to the requested information for all equity related
transactions subsequent to this request through the effective date of the registration statement.
The requested information is set forth on Exhibit B to this letter. Each option disclosed on
Exhibit A is exercisable to purchase shares of the Registrants common stock and was granted as
incentive compensation. No adjustment was made in determining the fair value of the underlying
shares of common stock for any option. For each option, the fair value of the underlying shares of
common stock was determined based on the most recent cash sale of common stock in an arms length
transaction with an unrelated third party. There are no special
conversion features in any of these grants and accordingly no value
was assigned or impacted the Registrants financial statements.
In each case, expense is recognized over the vesting period of the
option. Each option vests over 48 months from the date of grants
except for the option granted to Robert Mechur on October 31, 2008
which vests over 12 months from the date of grant. The Registrant confirms that it will provide the Staff
with updates to the requested information for all equity related transactions subsequent to the
request through the effective date of the registration statement.
20. Please describe the objective evidence that supports your determination of the fair value of
the underlying shares of common stock at each grant or issue date. This objective evidence could
be based on valuation reports on or current cash sales transactions of the same or a similar
company security to a willing unrelated party. Revise your disclosures to clearly indicate how you
determined this fair value and the impact of this assumption on your stock option.
The Registrant determined the fair market value of its common stock at each grant date based on the
most recent cash sale of common stock in an arms length transaction with an unrelated third party.
During each of the Registrants last four fiscal years, the Registrant engaged in at least one such
transaction. This valuation method assumption had no material impact other than a fair market
valuation determined on our net book value, which would be inconsistent for valuation purposes.
The requested revisions have been made. Please see the Stock-based Compensation in the notes to the
financial statements included in the Amendment.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 9
Results of Operations, page 37
21. Ensure that your MD&A discusses the changes in the mix of products being sold as summarized in
the table included in Note 23 Product Revenue of your financial statements. In addition, ensure
that your discussion includes an analysis of whether these increases are expected to continue.
Upon review, the Registrant has revised the Managements Discussion and Analysis section in
response to the comment above. Please see the Managements Discussion and Analysis section of the
Amendment.
Liquidity and Capital Resources, page 40
22. Revise the filing to disclose why your accounts receivable declines at the end of December 31,
2008. This discussion should identify any incentives provided to solicit an early collection, any
revision in payment terms with your customers, or a completion of a significant customer order.
Also, discuss the impact of the reduction in your accounts receivable on your cash flows and your
liquidity as this event appears to have had a significant impact. That is, the increase appears to
have been significant that without its effects you would have needed external financing.
The
requested revisions and additional disclosure have been made. Please see the Liquidity and
Capital Resources section of the Amendment.
23. Your disclosure within Note 11 Long-term Debt that a $500,000 convertible note payable was
due on January 1, 2009 and is still outstanding. Revise your capital resource discussion to
include an analysis of the impact of the extending this maturity date on your liquidity including
the impact if no extension was granted.
The requested revision has been made. Please see the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of the
Amendment.
24. You state that you will have sufficient cash to meet your liquidity needs taking into account
the anticipated proceeds of the sale of [y]our securities. Your disclosure should discuss your
liquidity without taking into account these anticipated proceeds. Further, if you will not have
sufficient cash to satisfy your liquidity needs, explain how you determined that there is no
uncertainty in your going concern assumption in preparing your financial statements.
The requested disclosure has been made. Please see the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of
the Amendment.
Securities
and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 10
The Registrant determined that there was no uncertainty in its going concern assumption in
preparing its financial statements as of and for the period ended December 31, 2008 for the reasons
set forth below:
|
|
|
the Registrant had no debt covenants that could result in the default of outstanding
debt; |
|
|
|
|
more than half of the Registrants accounts payable were owed to suppliers that are
shareholders of the Registrant and who have a long history of extending credit on
favorable terms to the Registrant; |
|
|
|
|
the Registrants operating budget for 2009 provided for positive cash flows from
operations during 2009; |
|
|
|
|
management has consistently (since 2002) demonstrated its ability to raise capital
in adverse market conditions and continue the Registrants operations; and |
|
|
|
|
the Registrant anticipated completing an initial public offering or other equity
financing during 2009, of which $300,000 was secured in January 2009. |
The Registrant also considered that its cash loss for its first two quarters of 2009 was $1,338,856
less versus the corresponding period in 2008 and that the improved results were achieved in a
quarter that is not historically the Registrants strongest.
Further, the Registrants operating plan provides for it to have
positive operating cash flow in the months from September through
December 2009 due to seasonally increased consumer product sales and
the commencement of several defense related engineering and product
programs.
Manufacturing, page 55
25. We note that you purchase almost all of the microdisplays used in your products from Kopin and
eMagin. In your response letter, please explain in greater detail why you believe that you are not
dependent upon these suppliers in order to continue to operate your business effectively. Also,
please describe your contractual arrangements with these suppliers. We note your disclosure on
page 17 that you purchase products from Kopin and eMagin pursuant to purchase orders. Please tell
us if you have a master agreement with either supplier. If you do, please tell us what
consideration you have given to filing each such agreement as an exhibit to your registration
statement. See Item 601(b)(10)(ii)(B) of Regulating S-K. Also, we note your disclosure on page 53
that 63.8% of your sales in 2008 were derived from providing goods and services to the U.S.
government, and that 80.7% of such sales were derived from subcontracts with Kopin and DRS. We
note that you have not filed any agreements with Kopin or DRS as exhibits. Please provide us with
your analysis as to whether you are substantially dependent on any of your agreements with these
companies.
Upon consideration, the Registrant has concluded that it may be deemed to be dependent upon Kopin
and eMagin to continue to operate its business effectively and the disclosure regarding its
relationship with its suppliers has been revised accordingly. Please see the Manufacturing section
in the Amendment. As described in the Registration Statement, the Registrant purchases
microdisplays from Kopin and eMagin on a purchase order basis and has no master agreement or other
contractual arrangement with these suppliers. Likewise, the sales we derive as a vendor to
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 11
Kopin and DRS are not made pursuant to any master agreement or other contractual arrangement but
are made on a purchase order basis. Accordingly, the Registrant has determined that there are no
agreements with Kopin, eMagin or DRS on which it is substantially dependent and which should be
filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement pursuant to
Item 601(b)(10)(ii)(B) of Regulation S-K.
Management, page 58
26. We note that Mr. Russell resides in Vancouver, British Columbia. Please tell us whether there
are any risks to potential investors associated with the companys reliance on a chief financial
officer that lives a significant distance from the companys headquarters. For example, please
advise if you believe it poses a risk to the companys internal control over financial reporting.
Also, please tell us the extent to which Mr. Russell is able to and does perform services at the
companys headquarters.
Upon consideration, the Registrant has concluded that Mr. Russells residence in Vancouver presents
a potential risk to investors and the registration statement has been revised accordingly. Please
see page 15 of the Amendment.
Mr. Russell has residences in both Vancouver, British Columbia and in a suburb of Rochester, New
York. Mr. Russell has maintained his Rochester residence for four years. During the last three
years, Mr. Russell has averaged over 50% of his working business days in Rochester or on
international business on behalf of the Registrant. When he is not physically in the Registrants
Rochester office, he is in full contact by phone and email and has full access remotely to all the
Registrants business and financial systems on a secure basis. From an internal control standpoint,
Mr. Russell is not involved in any of the daily accounting functions, all of which are performed by
the Registrants controller.
27. Please disclose the term of office for each of your directors and directors elect. See Item
401(a) of Regulation S-K.
The requested disclosure has been made. Please see page 58 of the Amendment.
Summary Compensation Table, page 61
28. Please tell us if the company had any executive officers other than Messrs. Travers and Russell
whose total compensation, as computed in accordance with Instruction 1 to Item 402(m)(2), exceeded
$100,000 in fiscal year 2008.
Other than Messrs. Travers and Russell, the Registrant had no executive officer whose total
compensation, as computed in accordance with Instruction 1 to Item 402(m)(2), exceeded $100,000 in
fiscal year 2008.
Securities
and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 12
Related Party Transactions, page 73
29. We note your disclosure on page 25 and 26 regarding an outstanding debt owed to your CEO under
a revolving loan agreement entered into in 2008 and your agreements with your CEO and CFO for
payment of deferred compensation and repayment of outstanding loans made to you more than five
years ago. Please include a discussion of these debts in this section or tell us why you believe
such disclosure is not required. See Item 404(d)(1) of Regulation S-K.
Upon consideration, the Registrant has concluded that a discussion of those debts should be
included in the Related Party Transaction section and that section has been revised accordingly.
Please see the Related Party Transaction section of the Amendment.
Board of Directors, page 74
30. Your disclosure on page 58 indicates that Mr. Lee is currently a member of your board of
directors, having joined the board in June 2009. The disclosure in this section states that your
board currently consists of only two members, your CEO and CFO. Please revise your disclosure to
resolve this discrepancy.
The requested revision has been made. Please see page 74 of the Amendment.
Description of Capital Stock, page 78
31. Please provide a materially complete description of the warrants being sold in the offering.
See Item 202(c) of Regulation S-K. Also, describe the factors considered in determining their
exercise price of the warrants. See Item 505(b) of Regulation S-K.
The requested disclosure has been made. Please see the Description of Capital Stock section of the
Amendment.
Series C Preferred Stock, page 79
32. Please file the certificate of designation for your Series C Preferred Stock as an exhibit to
the registration statement.
We respectfully note that the certificate of designations for the Registrants Series C Preferred
Stock is included in the Registrants certificate of incorporation filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the
Registration Statement.
Convertible Debt, page 80
33. We note the discussion in this section concerning the $500,000 convertible promissory note you
issued to a lender in September 2006. Note 11 to your consolidated financial
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 13
statements indicates that this promissory note was issued to a related party and that you may be in
default on the loan. Please tell us why the note is not discussed in the related party transaction
section on page 73 or filed as an exhibit to the registration statement. Also, please tell us what
consideration you gave to discussion this is loan, your plans to replay the loan and any resulting
impact on your liquidity in your Use of Proceeds discussion and in the liquidity section of your
Managements Discussion.
Upon consideration, the Registrant has concluded that a discussion of that promissory note should
be included in the Related Party Transaction section and that section has been revised accordingly.
Please see the Related Party Transaction section of the Amendment.
The Registrant determined that the promissory note did not need to be filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement under Item 601(4) of Regulation S-K. Although Item 601(4)(ii) requires that
all instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of a registrant be filed as
exhibits to a registration statement, Item 601(4)(iii) provides that a registrant is not required
to file:
|
|
|
(A) Any instrument with respect to long-term debt not being registered if the total
amount of securities authorized thereunder does not exceed 10 percent of the total
assets of the registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and if there
is filed an agreement to furnish a copy of such agreement to the Commission upon
request; [or] |
|
|
|
|
(B) Any instrument with respect to any class of securities if appropriate steps to
assure the redemption or retirement of such class will be taken prior to or upon
delivery by the registrant of the securities being registered. |
We note that the Registrants total assets as of March 31, 2009 were $5,277,583 and, accordingly,
the principal amount of the promissory note does not exceed 10% of the Registrants total assets
and that the exhibit index included the Registration Statement sets forth the Registrants agreement
to furnish to the Commission upon request a copy of agreements not filed as exhibits in reliance
upon Item 601(4)(iii)(A).
We further note that, as disclosed in the Registration Statement, the Registrant proposes to repay
the entire outstanding principal amount of the promissory note, together with all accrued and
unpaid interest thereon, from the proceeds of the offering. We respectfully submit that payment in
full of the Registrants obligations under the promissory note would constitute redemption or
retirement of the securities represented thereby for purposes of Item 601(4)(iii)(B) and,
accordingly, the Registrant is entitled to not file the promissory note as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement in reliance on Item 601(4)(iii)(B).
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 14
Legal Matters, page 90
34. Please tell us why this section refers to counsels views regarding the validity of the shares
of common stock offered by the prospectus, but does not reference the units or the warrants
included in those units, or counsels view regarding whether the warrants will be binding
obligations of the company that will be enforceable in accordance with their terms.
The opinion of legal counsel to the Registrant to be filed as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement will cover all those matters required under Item 601(b)(5) of Regulation S-K and the
disclosure has been revised accordingly. Please see the Legal Matters section of the Amendment.
Note 2 Nature of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition, page F-10
35. Tell us whether your product sales arrangements include more than one element or deliverable.
If so, tell us how you identify each element and explain how you allocate the arrangement fee to
each of those elements. Further, describe whether your products contain any embedded software. If
so, provide us with the evaluation that you used to determine that the software is incidental. See
paragraph 2 and footnote 2 of SOP 97-2. In addition, tell us whether you provide any maintenance
or similar service along with your products.
The Registrants product sales arrangements do not include more than one element or deliverable.
The entire product is delivered at the time of first sale to the customer. The firmware is not sold
separately and would only work with one of the Registrants products. From time to time, free
upgrades have been made available usually to add some new level of functionality. The software
the Registrant includes is just firmware that is incidental to the product. Footnote 2 to paragraph
2 of SOP 97-2 provides the following indicators of whether software is incidental to a product as a
whole:
|
(a) |
|
the firmware is not sold separately nor is it marketed
separately in a significant way; |
|
|
(b) |
|
the Registrant does not sell customer support contracts and only offer a standard
product warranty. To date the Registrant has only offered a software
upgrade on two of its consumer
products and both have been free of charge for any customer who
wanted them; |
|
|
(c) |
|
the Registrant's development of the firmware is not significant in relation to the overall
development costs of each its products; |
|
|
(d) |
|
the Registrant's firmware is not useable on other or competing
products;
|
|
|
(e) |
|
no software is required for troubleshooting or regular
maintenance of the Registrant's products; |
|
|
(f) |
|
the Registrant does not offer modification or customization
services on its firmware to any end
customers; and |
|
|
(g) |
|
there are no multiple deliveries and there is only one
element to the Registrant's products the
video eyewear with its embedded firmware. |
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 15
Based on these above criteria, the Registrant believes that its firmware and software is
incidental.
Earnings per share, page F-12
36. We note that your Series C Preferred Shares are participating shares since they are entitled to
participate ratably on an as converted bases in any dividends paid on your common shares (see page
79). In these instances, the participating shares should be included in basis using the two-class
methods. See paragraphs 60 and 61 of SFAS 128 and EITF 03-6.
SFAS 128 recommends that the if-converted method should only be used for those securities that are
convertible into common stock if the effect is dilutive. In the Registrants case if the Series C
Preferred Shares were treated as converted, due to the Registrants losses the effect of the
accrued dividend would be anti-dilutive.
37. We note that you have included convertible notes and preferred shares using the treasury stock
method. Explain why this is the proper method instead of the as-if-converted method. See
paragraph 26 of SFAS 128. Further, your description of diluted earnings per shares should refer to
warrants.
The Registrant has determined that in both cases the impact of conversion of the notes and
preferred shares after the add-back of interest and dividends would be anti-dilutive. The
disclosure has been revised to state that the as-if-converted method has been used.
Note 23 Product Revenues, page F-25
38. Please consider providing product revenue for the interim periods in addition to the year end
information included in the table. In this regard, this information should be consistent with the
periods included n your financial statements.
The requested disclosure has been made. Please see Note 23 Product Revenues in the financial
statements included in the Amendment.
Part II Information
Item 16, Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules, page II-6
39. Provide the consents of Frank Zammataro, Kathryn Sayko and Bernard Perrine that are specified
in Rule 438.
The requested disclosure has been made. Please see Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3 to the Amendment.
Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
September 4, 2009
Page 16
Item 17, Undertakings, page II-6
40. Since your transaction is a continuous offering to be made pursuant to Rule 415, expand this
section to include the undertakings at Item 512(a) of Regulation S-K.
The requested disclosure has been made. Please see Item 17 of the Amendment.
Please do not hesitate to call me at (585) 238-3576, or my colleague, Lawrence Kallaur, at
(585) 238-3530, if you have any questions or would like any additional information regarding this
matter.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Robert F. Mechur
Robert F. Mechur
cc: |
|
Mr. Paul J. Travers
Mr. Grant Russell |
Exhibit A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
|
|
Type |
|
Shares Issuable |
|
|
|
Exercise Price per |
|
Fair Market Value |
|
Underlying Shares |
|
Amount of Expense |
Name of Holder |
|
of Grant |
|
upon Exercise |
|
Date of Issuance |
|
Share |
|
per Share |
|
at Grant Date |
|
Recognized |
Adam Travers
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.150 |
|
|
$ |
0.150 |
|
|
$ |
9,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,521 |
|
Grant Russell
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
18,405 |
|
Steven Ward
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
22,500 |
|
|
$ |
13,804 |
|
Abigail Kennedy
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,380 |
|
Brian Degus
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
5,250 |
|
|
$ |
3,221 |
|
Charles Moyer
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,560 |
|
|
$ |
957 |
|
Christina Ashley
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
$ |
2,301 |
|
Craig Travers
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,202 |
|
Dana Greutman
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,560 |
|
|
$ |
957 |
|
David Lock
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,202 |
|
David Reussow
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
|
$ |
460 |
|
Fredrick Kuhs
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
Fujii Keiichiro
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,202 |
|
Ian Sinclair
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
22,500 |
|
|
$ |
13,804 |
|
James Donnelly
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
11,250 |
|
|
$ |
6,902 |
|
James Schultz
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
Jay Bischalaney
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
4,601 |
|
Joe Rodibaugh
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,202 |
|
John Burtis
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
22,500 |
|
|
$ |
13,804 |
|
John Stuart
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,380 |
|
Kelli Doe
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
$ |
2,301 |
|
Masakazu Kobayashi
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,840 |
|
Matt Voss
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
35,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
5,250 |
|
|
$ |
3,221 |
|
Michael Artz
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
Michael Joyner
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
Mike Fedyk
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of |
|
|
|
|
Type |
|
Shares Issuable |
|
|
|
Exercise Price per |
|
Fair Market Value |
|
Underlying Shares |
|
Amount of Expense |
Name of Holder |
|
of Grant |
|
upon Exercise |
|
Date of Issuance |
|
Share |
|
per Share |
|
at Grant Date |
|
Recognized |
Peter Burke
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,920 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,638 |
|
|
$ |
1,005 |
|
Phuong Yeh
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
Robert Pille
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
Robert Reay
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
4,601 |
|
Robert Schultz
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
7,500 |
|
|
$ |
4,601 |
|
Scott Chapman
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,400 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,560 |
|
|
$ |
957 |
|
Scott Hentz
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
6,750 |
|
|
$ |
4,141 |
|
Shane Porzio
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
9,202 |
|
Stacey Faugh
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
Steve Smith
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
11,250 |
|
|
$ |
6,902 |
|
Steven Hornos
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
2,250 |
|
|
$ |
1,380 |
|
Sue Harris
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
Therese Travers
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
3,750 |
|
|
$ |
2,301 |
|
Tracy Bush
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
Wilfred Clay
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
1,500 |
|
|
$ |
920 |
|
Peter Artz
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
22,500 |
|
|
$ |
13,804 |
|
Stephen Glaser
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
18,750 |
|
|
$ |
11,503 |
|
Vinny Ferrer
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
5/1/2009
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
18,750 |
|
|
$ |
11,503 |
|
David Lock
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
11/1/2008
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
37,500 |
|
|
$ |
23,006 |
|
Mike Hallett
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
121,424 |
|
|
11/1/2008
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
18,214 |
|
|
$ |
11,174 |
|
Peter Artz
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
11/1/2008
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
11,250 |
|
|
$ |
6,902 |
|
Robert Mechur
|
|
Nonqualified Stock Option
|
|
|
142,864 |
|
|
10/31/2008
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
0.15000 |
|
|
$ |
21,430 |
|
|
$ |
13,147 |
|
Ron Haidenger
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
320,000 |
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
64,000 |
|
|
$ |
39,263 |
|
Shane Porzio
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
32,000 |
|
|
$ |
19,632 |
|
Barry Eagan
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
320,000 |
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
64,000 |
|
|
$ |
39,263 |
|
Tim Duffy
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,270 |
|
Jason Basciani
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
128,000 |
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
25,600 |
|
|
$ |
15,705 |
|
Trevor Hyde
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
20,000 |
|
|
$ |
12,270 |
|
Sheree Usiatynski
|
|
Incentive Stock Option
|
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
6/30/2008
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
0.20000 |
|
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
|
$ |
24,540 |
|